用超效率综合DEA模型来研究DEA有效性

对超效率综合DEA模型,有三个定理来判断其不可行性,其中一个定理基于加性模型来判断,并证明:当模型不可行时被评决策单元的扩展DEA有效性,由此给出了对扩展DEA有效的决策单元排序的方法,此外,对不含非阿基米德无穷小的基于输入(输出)的超效率综合DEA模型,当其最优值为1时,有一个定理来判断被评单元的DEA有效性.     

Super-efficiency and stability intervals in additive DEA

This study addresses the problem of finding the range of efficiency for each Decision Making Unit (DMU) considering uncertain data. Uncertainty in the DMU coefficients in each factor (input or output) is captured through interval coefficients (ie, these are uncertain but bounded). A two-phase additive Data Envelopment Analysis model for performance evaluation is used, which is adapted to include the concept of super-efficiency to provide a robustness analysis of the DMUs in face of uncertain information, assessing whether each DMU is surely efficient, potentially efficient, or surely inefficient for the uncertainty intervals specified. Another contribution is to present how a maximal stability hyper-rectangle can be computed for each DMU such that its efficiency status does not change when the coefficients vary within that interval.     

Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA

Lee et al. (2011) and Chen and Liang (2011) develop a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to address the infeasibility issue in super-efficiency models. In this paper, we point out that their model is feasible when input data are positive but can be infeasible when some of input is zero. Their model is modified so that the new super-efficiency DEA model is always feasible when data are non-negative. Note that zero data can make the super-efficiency model under constant returns to scale (CRS) infeasible. Our discussion is based upon variable returns to scale (VRS) and can be applied to CRS super-efficiency models.     

Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility

It is well known that super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach can be infeasible under the condition of variable returns to scale (VRS). By extending of the work of Chen (2005), the current study develops a two-stage process for calculating super-efficiency scores regardless whether the standard VRS super-efficiency mode is feasible or not. The proposed approach examines whether the standard VRS super-efficiency DEA model is infeasible. When the model is feasible, our approach yields super-efficiency scores that are identical to those arising from the original model. For efficient DMUs that are infeasible under the super-efficiency model, our approach yields super-efficiency scores that characterize input savings and/or output surpluses. The current study also shows that infeasibility may imply that an efficient DMU does not exhibit super-efficiency in inputs or outputs. When infeasibility occurs, it can be necessary that (i) both inputs and outputs be decreased to reach the frontier formed by the remaining DMUs under the input-orientation and (ii) both inputs and outputs be increased to reach the frontier formed by the remaining DMUs under the output-orientation. The newly developed approach is illustrated with numerical examples.     

广义超效率区间DEA模型及其有效性研究

根据样本单元的区间投入、区间产出定义最大样本生产可能集,建立基于最大样本生产可能集的广义超效率区间DEA模型,然后定义了待评价决策单元基于广义超效率区间DEA模型的超效率区间,并讨论了待评价决策单元的有效性,最后通过实例表明了广义超效率区间DEA模型的实用性.     

Super-efficiency in DEA by effectiveness of each unit in society

One of the most important topics in management science is determining the efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs). The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique is employed for this purpose. In many DEA models, the best performance of a DMU is indicated by an efficiency score of one. There is often more than one DMU with this efficiency score. To rank and compare efficient units, many methods have been introduced under the name of super-efficiency methods. Among these methods, one can mention Andersen and Petersen’s (1993) [1] super-efficiency model, and the slack-based measure introduced by Tone (2002) [4]. Each of the methods proposed for ranking efficient DMUs has its own advantages and shortcomings. In this paper, we present a super-efficiency method by which units that are more effective and useful in society have better ranks. In fact, in order to determine super-efficiency by this method, the effectiveness of each unit in society is considered rather than the cross-comparison of the units. To do so, we divide the inputs and outputs into two groups, desirable and undesirable, at the discretion of the manager, and assign weights to each input and output. Then we determine the rank of each DMU according to the weights and the desirability of inputs and outputs.     

Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: One model approach

A two-stage procedure is developed by Lee et al. (2011) [European Journal of Operational Research doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.022] to address the infeasibility issue in super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) models. We point out that their two-stage procedure can be solved in a single DEA-based model.     

水资源利用与产业结构演进的关系检验——基于超效DEA和PECM的分析

首先运用超效DEA模型测算三次产业的全要素水资源利用效率,然后利用我国2004-2015年间的省际面板数据,建立面板误差修正模型,检验水资源利用与产业结构演进的关系,研究发现:水资源利用与产业结构演进存在协整关系;这种长期稳定关系在三次产业间的短期调节和长期效应不尽相同.     

Identifying the anchor points in DEA using sensitivity analysis in linear programming

In this paper, the anchor points in DEA, as an important subset of the set of extreme efficient points of the production possibility set (PPS), are studied. A basic definition, utilizing the multiplier DEA models, is given. Then, two theorems are proved which provide necessary and sufficient conditions for characterization of these points. The main results of the paper lead to a new interesting connection between DEA and sensitivity analysis in linear programming theory. By utilizing the established theoretical results, a successful procedure for identification of the anchor points is presented.     

Applying inverse DEA and cone constraint to sensitivity analysis of DMUs with undesirable inputs and outputs

In this paper, the inverse data envelopment analysis (DEA) with the preference of cone constraints will be discussed in a way that in the decision-making units, the undesirable inputs and outputs exist simultaneously. Supposing that the efficiency level does not change, if the unit under assessment increases the level of the desirable outputs and decreases the level of the undesirable outputs, how will it affect the amount of the desirable input level and the undesirable input level? To answer this question, the application of the inverse DEA with preference of cone constraints is suggested. The suggested approach, while maintaining the efficiency level, increases the level of its undesirable input and decreases the level of its desirable input by selection of strongly efficient solutions or some weakly efficient solutions of the multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) model. While maintaining the efficiency level, the suggested approach by selection of strongly efficient solution or some of the weakly efficient solutions of the MOLP model can increase the undesirable input level and decrease the desirable input level. Similarly, the suggested approach can be applied if the decision-making unit increases its undesirable input level and decreases the desirable input level so that the undesirable output level decreases and the desirable output level increases while maintaining the efficiency level. As an illustration, two numerical examples are rendered.     

Super-efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis: An input relaxation approach

This paper addresses super-efficiency issue based on input relaxation model in stochastic data envelopment analysis. The proposed model is not limited to using the input amounts of evaluating DMU, and one can obtain a total ordering of units by using this method. The input relaxation super-efficiency model is developed in stochastic data envelopment analysis, and its deterministic equivalent, also, is derived which is a nonlinear program. Moreover, it is shown that the deterministic equivalent of the stochastic super-efficiency model can be converted to a quadratic program. As an empirical example, the proposed method is applied to the data of textile industry of China to rank efficient units. Finally, when allowable limits of data variations for evaluating DMU are permitted, the sensitivity analysis of the proposed model is discussed.     

Super-efficiency of vector optimization in Banach spaces

Using variational analysis, in terms of the Clarke normal cone, we consider super-efficiency of vector optimization in Banach spaces. We establish some characterizations for super-efficiency. In particular, dropping the assumption that the ordering cone has a bounded base, we extend a result in Borwein and Zhuang [J.M. Borwein, D. Zhuang, Super-efficiency in vector optimization, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 338 (1993) 105-122] to the nonconvex setting.     

Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA with bounded uncertainty

Measurement errors, incomplete information and noisy input and output data create difficulties in assessing the efficiency of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Previous studies have addressed uncertainty using interval analysis to extend the classical DEA problem to the case of bounded uncertainties. This paper proposes an approach to analyze the sensitivity and stability radius. By assuming that the data vary within a bounded interval, all of the decision making units (DMUs) can be classified as \(\hbox {E}^{++}, \hbox {E}^{+},\) and \(\hbox {E}^{-}\). To determine how sensitive these classifications are to possible data perturbations, the paper develops programs to calculate the stability radius within which the percentage data variation does not change the class of efficiency unit. In addition, the data changes are applied to not only the DMU that is being evaluation but also all of the DMUs and the various input and output subsets.     

Reconciling ratio analysis and DEA as performance assessment tools

The assessment of operational performance remains a fundamental challenge both in practice and in theory. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is one method developed in production economic theory and applied by researchers to study groups of enterprises. In practice, individual enterprises almost universally rely on simple output–input ratios. Each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, but the theoretical connection between the two has not been fully articulated. This paper uses the framework of DEA to establish a mathematical relationship between DEA efficiency scores and corresponding ratio analysis. The relationship can be expressed as a product of seven components: technical efficiency, technical change, scale efficiency, input slack factor, input substitution factor, output slack factor and output substitution factor.     

DEA/AR profit ratios and sensitivity of 100 large U.S. banks

Several important DEA/AR concepts were applied here to banking for the first time. This application includes classification, sensitivity, uniqueness, linked cones (LCs), and profit ratios. Notably, large bank behavior seems to be explained better by profit ratios than by relative efficiency. Measures of DEA efficiency, AR efficiency, and LC profit ratios were made for a bank panel of the U.S.'s 100 largest banks in asset size from 1986 to 1991. High levels of inefficiency were found, as in previous studies. Classification of the DEA efficiency measures identified the inefficient DMUs with some positive primal slacks. Sensitivity analysis of the DEA efficiency measures showed that the extreme-efficient classification was generally relatively insensitive to errors in the data. The ARs eliminated (i) 44% to 60% of the DEA-extreme-efficient DMUs and (ii) all of the banks with unprofitable actual profit ratios. Some statistical analyses highlight the superiority of the LC profit ratios, relative to the AR efficiency measures.     

Grid sensitivity analysis

This paper presents a method to compute the sensitivities of displacements and natural frequencies to the changes in grid locations. The sensitivities are computed within using the semi-analytical method via a program. New software was developed to assist in the selection of design variables and plot the spatial variation of the sensitivities on the finite element model. Two example problems demonstrate the technique.     

DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units

The purpose of this study is to develop a new method which provides for given inputs and outputs the best common weights for all the units that discriminate optimally between the efficient and inefficient units as pregiven by the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), in order to rank all the units on the same scale. This new method, Discriminant Data Envelopment Analysis of Ratios (DR/DEA), presents a further post-optimality analysis of DEA for organizational units when their multiple inputs and outputs are given. We construct the ratio between the composite output and the composite input, where their common weights are computed by a new non-linear optimization of goodness of separation between the two pregiven groups. A practical use of DR/DEA is that the common weights may be utilized for ranking the units on a unified scale. DR/DEA is a new use of a two-group discriminant criterion that has been presented here for ratios, rather than the traditional discriminant analysis which applies to a linear function. Moreover, non-parametric statistical tests are employed to verify the consistency between the classification from DEA (efficient and inefficient units) and the post-classification as generated by DR/DEA.     

Congestion analysis in DEA inputs under weight restrictions

Data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is used to determine the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU), is able to recognize the amount of input congestion. Moreover, the relative importance of inputs and outputs can be incorporated into DEA models by weight restrictions. These restrictions or a priori weights are introduced by the decision maker and lead to changes in models and efficiency interpretation. In this paper, we present an approach to determine the value of congestion in inputs under the weight restrictions. Some discussions show how weight restrictions can affect the congestion amount.     

Crack nucleation sensitivity analysis

A simple analytical expression for crack nucleation sensitivity analysis is proposed relying on the concept of topological derivative and applied within a two‐dimensional linear elastic fracture mechanics theory (LEFM). In particular, the topological asymptotic expansion of the total potential energy together with a Griffith‐type energy of an elastic cracked body is calculated. As a main result, we derive a crack nucleation criterion based on the topological derivative and a criterion for determining the direction of crack growth based on the topological gradient. The proposed methodology leads to an axiomatic approach of crack nucleation sensitivity analysis. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.