The interlaboratory comparison "IMEP-19 trace elements in rice"—a new approach for measurement performance evaluation

The aim of IMEP is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. IMEP-19 focused on measurements of trace elements in rice aiming to support the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 466/2001 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuff. Measurement results for the elements Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn were reported by 267 field laboratories involved in food analysis from 43 countries. Performance criteria for the evaluation of the reported measurement results in IMEP-19 are suggested. The chosen performance indicators not only take into account the deviation of the reported measurement value from the certified reference value, but also set criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainty. The IMEP-19 participants' performance is reviewed by means of using new simple graphical tools, called "Naji plots".     

Establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges for the content of various elements in the IMEP-9 water sample

 The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) attempts to shed light on the current state of the practice in chemical measurements. The main tool, which assists this attempt and also differentiates IMEP from similar projects, is the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges (where possible) for the elements offered for measurement to the participants for every IMEP round. The Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), as the founder and co-ordinator of IMEP has the responsibility of establishing the SI-traceable reference ranges. This is a large task that requires knowledge, skill and resources. IRMM collaborates with a network of reference laboratories in order to achieve the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges in a transparent and reliable way. The IMEP reference laboratories must have demonstrated experience and have a proven and successful record in the use of primary methods of measurements (mainly isotope dilution mass spectrometry) and the application of uncertainty evaluation according to ISO/BIPM guidelines. In IMEP-9 "trace elements in water", results from 7 reference laboratories (including IRMM) were combined by IRMM to establish SI-traceable ranges for the 15 elements, which were then offered for measurement to the 200 participants worldwide. This paper does not discuss the individual contribution of the reference laboratories (this could be the subject of individual papers) but describes the procedures and criteria used in order to establish the reference ranges for the IMEP-9 samples by combining the individual contributions. All results submitted to IRMM are included, so as to make this publication as realistic as possible. Received: 31 December 1999 / Accepted: 7 March 2000     

IMEP-12: trace elements in water; objective evaluation of the performance of the laboratories when measuring quality parameters prescribed in the European Directive 98/83/EC

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme, founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-12, for the fourth time in the series, focused on trace elements in water and it was designed specifically to support European Commission directive 98/83/EC. Reference values for the concentration of ten elements were established with expanded uncertainties according to GUM. In total, 348 laboratories from 46 countries in five continents participated in the comparison and the degree of equivalence between the results of the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Samples from the same batch were distributed to ten laboratories from European Countries, which represented their country in the framework of the EUROMET project 528. Participation in this comparison was offered to the European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA) for participation of accredited laboratories from all over Europe in the framework of the collaboration between IRMM and EA and to laboratories from the EU new member states and acceding countries in the frame of IRMM’s ‘Metrology in Chemistry support program for EU new member states and acceding countries.’     

International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP); IMEP-14: Picturing the performance of analytical laboratories measuring trace elements in sediment

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-14, for the first time in the series, is focusing on trace elements in sediment. Reference values for ten elements stating total concentrations and expanded uncertainties according to GUM were established. In total, 239 laboratories from 43 countries in five continents participated in the comparison, and the degree of equivalence between the results from the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Identical samples were distributed to nine National Measurement Institutes within the frame of the CCQM-P15 pilot study. Participation in the IMEP-14 interlaboratory comparison was offered to laboratories in the EU new member states and acceding countries according to the IRMMs Metrology in Chemistry support programme for EU new member states and acceding countries.This revised version was published online in August 2004 with corrections to text especially to the Discussion section.     

Contribution to the certification of B,Cd, Cu,Mg and Pb in a synthetic water sample,by use of isotope-dilution ICP-MS,for Comparison 12 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme

The contribution of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements to the certification of the B, Cd, Cu, Mg, and Pb content of a synthetic water sample used in Comparison 12 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) is described. The aim of the IMEP programme is to demonstrate objectively the degree of equivalence and quality of chemical measurements of individual laboratories on the international scene by comparing them with reference ranges traceable to the SI (Système International d'Unités). IMEP is organized in support of European Union policies and helps to improve the traceability of values produced by field chemical measurement laboratories. The analytical procedure used to establish the reference values for the B, Cd, Cu, Mg, and Pb content of the IMEP-12 sample is based on inductively coupled plasma-isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (ICP-IDMS) applied as a primary method of measurement. The measurements performed for the IMEP-12 study are described in detail. Focus is on the element boron, which is particularly difficult to analyze by ICP-MS because of potential problems of low sensitivity, high mass discrimination, memory effects, and abundance sensitivity. For each of the certified amount contents presented here a total uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and Eurachem guidelines. For all investigated elements with concentrations in the low micro g kg(-1) and mg kg(-1) range (corresponding to pmol kg(-1) to the high micro mol kg(-1) level), SI-traceable reference values with relative expanded uncertainties ( k=2) of less than 2 % were obtained.     

SI-traceable certification of the IMEP-12 water sample combining contributions from different reference laboratories

In the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) comparison, a synthetically prepared water sample was offered to the analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Pb. The choice of elements to be measured was based on EU legislation, which the comparison was aiming to support. As to the IMEP policy, the laboratories’ results were presented according to the certified/assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories all around the world. The performed certification campaign is described in detail in this paper. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) was applied as a primary method of measurement (PMM), whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. Apart from IDMS for reference measurements of some elements, k _o-neutron activation analysis (k _o-NAA) and external calibration (Ext-Calib) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were applied. The reference values were characterised as “certified” (for B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ni and Pb) or “assigned” (for As and Mn) according to the IMEP policy. Measurement uncertainty of the certified/assigned reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM guide using the specialised software GUM Workbench.

     

SI-traceable certification of the IMEP-12 water sample combining contributions from different reference laboratories

In the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-12) comparison, a synthetically prepared water sample was offered to the analytical laboratories to perform measurements of As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Pb. The choice of elements to be measured was based on EU legislation, which the comparison was aiming to support. As to the IMEP policy, the laboratories’ results were presented according to the certified/assigned reference values established by several reference laboratories all around the world. The performed certification campaign is described in detail in this paper. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) was applied as a primary method of measurement (PMM), whenever possible, to achieve SI-traceable results. Apart from IDMS for reference measurements of some elements, k _o-neutron activation analysis (k _o-NAA) and external calibration (Ext-Calib) using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were applied. The reference values were characterised as “certified” (for B, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ni and Pb) or “assigned” (for As and Mn) according to the IMEP policy. Measurement uncertainty of the certified/assigned reference values was calculated according to the ISO/BIPM guide using the specialised software GUM Workbench.     

Is it possible to agree on a value for inorganic arsenic in food? The outcome of IMEP-112

Two of the core tasks of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Heavy Metals in Feed and Food (EU-RL-HM) are to provide advice to the Directorate General for Health and Consumers (DG SANCO) on scientific matters and to organise proficiency tests among appointed National Reference Laboratories. This article presents the results of the 12th proficiency test organised by the EU-RL-HM (IMEP-112) that focused on the determination of total and inorganic arsenic in wheat, vegetable food and algae. The test items used in this exercise were: wheat sampled in a field with a high concentration of arsenic in the soil, spinach (SRM 1570a from NIST) and an algae candidate reference material. Participation in this exercise was open to laboratories from all around the world to be able to judge the state of the art of the determination of total and, more in particular, inorganic arsenic in several food commodities. Seventy-four laboratories from 31 countries registered to the exercise; 30 of them were European National Reference Laboratories. The assigned values for IMEP-112 were provided by a group of seven laboratories expert in the field of arsenic speciation analysis in food. Laboratory results were rated with z and ζ scores (zeta scores) in accordance with ISO 13528. Around 85?% of the participants performed satisfactorily for inorganic arsenic in vegetable food and 60?% did for inorganic arsenic in wheat, but only 20?% of the laboratories taking part in the exercise were able to report satisfactory results in the algae test material.     

The IRMM International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) IMEP-4: Trace elements (Li, Cu, Zn) in serum

The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of state-of-the-practice analytical measurements by comparing them to a reference value obtained by a primary method of measurement. The referencevalue is therefore as traceable to the SI system of measurements as can presently be achieved and is independent of human or political decisions. Thus a large scale field test is made to achieve (international) comparability of measurements by comparing them with an independent metrologically established value. In the fourth measurement round, IMEP-4, three trace elements, Li, Cu and Zn, at three different levels in (bovine) serum were measured by about 12 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values established by an isotope-specific method, isotope dilution mass spectrometry, defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference value with its own uncertainty range, although the self-declared accuracy of the laboratories was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality.     

IMEP in support of the comparability of measurement results across the Romanian chemical metrology infrastructure

On the basis of quantitative chemical measurements many important decisions are made in support of legislation or in industrial processes or social aspects. For this reason it is important to improve the quality of chemical measurement results and thus make them comparable and acceptable everywhere. The measurement quality is important to enable an equivalent implementation of the European Union regulations and directives across an enlarged EU. In this context, the European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Reference Materials and Measurement (EC-JRC-IRMM) set up a programme to improve the scientific basis for metrology in chemistry (MiC) in EU candidate countries in the framework of EU enlargement. Several activities were initiated, such as training, fellowships, sponsoring of seminars, conferences and participation in interlaboratory comparisons. To disseminate measurement traceability, IRMM provides through its International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) an interlaboratory tool to enable the benchmarking of laboratory performance. IMEP emphasizes the metrological aspects of measurement results, such as traceability and measurement uncertainty. In this way it has become a publicly available European tool for MiC. The Romanian Bureau of Legal Metrology – National Institute of Metrology (BRML-INM) actively supports the participation of Romanian authorized and field laboratories in IMEP interlaboratory comparisons. This paper describes the interest of Romanian laboratories participating in this programme, the analytical and metrological problems that became relevant during these exercises and some actions for improvement. The results from Romanian laboratories participating in IMEP-12 (water), IMEP-16 (wine), IMEP-17 (human serum) and IMEP-20 (tuna fish) are presented. To conclude, the educational and training activities at national level organized jointly by the Romanian National Institute of Metrology (INM) and IRMM are also mentioned.     

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme,IMEP-8: carbon and oxygen isotope ratios in CO<Subscript>2</Subscript>

In IMEP-8, two samples of high purity CO(2)(g), with different carbon and oxygen isotope ratios were distributed to 27 participants, originating from 14 countries and from various isotopic measurement domains (geochemistry, atmospheric and food chemistry), but particularly set up for food laboratories. In total 19 laboratories reported results. The outcome of this comparison exercise shows that the laboratories reported carbon and oxygen isotope results in good agreement with the reference values across the domains. The reported results for delta(13)C(VPDB) (carbon) for both materials are within 1 per thousand. However, for the reported results of delta(18)O(VPDB) (oxygen) for both materials the overall spread of the reported results is about 11 per thousand. Within this spread two distinct groups of participants can be identified, where the results within each group vary about 2 per thousand. The latter seems to be caused by calculation errors by participants of the reporting delta(18)O(VPDB) values. As requested, participants also reported the isotope amount ratio for carbon and oxygen in the CO(2) samples. For carbon, all reported results for both materials agree with the isotope ratio value, which can be traced back to the value reported by Craig. For oxygen, all results are in good agreement and deviate by a maximum of 0.5% from the reference values measured at IRMM. Work carried out indicates the carbon isotope ratio, for both samples IMEP-8A and IMEP-8B, differ from those reported by Craig by as much as 1.2%. In the case of oxygen, this deviation is far smaller. Both data sets, i.e. the one realised by Craig and the one realised at IRMM, demonstrate traceability to SI. It is clear that both values significantly disagree.     

Contribution to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U in a natural water sample for the International Measurement Evaluation Programme Round 9 (IMEP-9) using ID-ICP-MS

 The present paper describes the contribution of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents in a natural water sample, in round 9 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-9). The analytical procedure to establish the reference values for B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents was based on isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry used as a primary method of measurement. Applying this procedure reference values, traceable to the SI, were obtained for the natural water sample of IMEP-9. For each of the certified amount contents presented here a total uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO and EURACHEM guidelines. The measurement procedures, as well as the uncertainty calculations are described for all seven elements mentioned above. In order to keep the whole certification process transparent and so traceable, the preparations of various reagents and materials as well as the sample treatment and blending, the measurements themselves, and finally the data treatment are described in detail. Explanations focus on Pb as a representative example. The total uncertainties (relative) obtained were less than 2% for all investigated elements at amount contents in the pmol/kg up to the high μmol/kg range, corresponding to low μg/kg and mg/kg levels. Received: 21 October 1999 / Accepted: 29 January 2000     

Evaluation of laboratory performance in IMEP water interlaboratory comparisons

The aim of International Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. Three major interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs), IMEP-6, IMEP-9 and IMEP-12, on trace elements in water were carried out from 1994 to 2000. Participants' results for Cd, Fe and Pb concentrations from these three different IMEP water ILCs were compared by means of suitable performance indicators. The performance evaluation criteria were set according to the requirements stated in the Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Two different performance indicators were selected for evaluation of the individual participants' results: the commonly used z-score and the not so well-known E _n number. The group performance indicator is based on the variation of z-scores. To assess the individual measurement performance, not only the deviation of the reported measurement values from the certified reference value, but also criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainties were taken into account. The participants' performance is also reviewed by means of using a simple graphical tool, called “Naji-plots”.     

Does the determination of inorganic arsenic in rice depend on the method?

In answering a request from the Directorate General for Health and Consumers of the European Commission, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Heavy Metals in Feed and Food, with the support of the International Measurement Evaluation Program, organized a proficiency test (PT), IMEP-107, on the determination of total and inorganic arsenic (As) in rice. The main aim of this PT was to judge the state of the art of analytical capability for the determination of total and inorganic As in rice. For this reason, participation in this exercise was open to laboratories from all over the world. Some 98 laboratories reported results for total As and 32 for inorganic As.The main conclusions of IMEP-107 were that the concentration of inorganic As determined in rice does not depend on the analytical method applied and that introduction of a maximum level for inorganic As in rice should not be postponed because of analytical concerns.     

The IRMM – International Measurement Evaluation Programme,IMEP

 The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of the state-of-the-practice (SoP) of chemical measurements in field laboratories by comparing them to a reference range that contains a value that is as traceable to the SI system of measurements (in this case to the Avogadro Constant, one of the best realizations of the mole so far), as can presently be achieved, but which in any case is independent of human or political decision. Thus, a large-scale field test has been made to realize (international) comparability of these measurements by providing them with an independent scientific common basis. In the third measurement round, IMEP-3, ten trace elements, B, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Pb, Rb and Zn were measured in a synthetic and in a natural water by about 155 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values, established by IRMM and NIST, using isotope specific methods (isotope dilution mass spectrometry and neutron activation analysis), wherever possible. One of these methods (IDMS) has recently been defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance (Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière: CCQM) in its founding meeting in April 1995 at BIPM, Paris. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference range, although the declared accuracy was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between a self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality. There is little reduction in the spread of the measurements if the results obtained for one element in the natural water B are divided by the results obtained for the same element in the synthetic water A (which was unknowingly, a reference material). Index entries International measurement evaluation programme (IMEP).     

Performance evaluation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons analysis in sediment from proficiency testing with metrological reference values

This paper describes a metrological approach to evaluate the measurement capability of laboratories participating in two proficiency testing (PT) programmes involving the analysis of five polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment samples. Reference values of PAHs in the programmes for performance assessment were obtained from an accurate isotope dilution gas chromatography mass spectrometry (ID-GCMS) method which was thoroughly validated and verified. Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) technique usually has a well-defined measurement uncertainty budget and a traceability link to an International System of Units. Provision of the metrological reference values in PT enables the establishment of a technical platform to assess the actual competence of the participating laboratories in sediment PAHs analysis. Results of the PT programmes showed that about 80 % of the laboratories employed gas chromatography in their analyses and the remaining used liquid chromatography. Irrespective of the techniques being used, however, the majority of the participating laboratories were observed to underestimate values in which the mean values of the five reported PAHs were less than those of the ID-GCMS-derived reference values by 13–20 %. Only 41–44 % of the participating laboratories were able to achieve satisfactory z-scores. The present study revealed that the reinforcement of the capability for accurate measurement of PAHs in sediment samples in laboratories worldwide should be addressed.     

Value assignment of retinol, retinyl palmitate, tocopherol, and carotenoid concentrations in Standard Reference Material 2383 (Baby Food Composite)

In 1997, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2383 Baby Food Composite. This SRM can be used as a control material when assigning values to in-house control materials and when validating analytical methods for the measurement of proximates, vitamins, minerals, and trace elements in baby foods and similar matrixes. The Certificate of Analysis for SRM 2383 provides certified and reference values for concentrations of lutein, zeaxanthin, beta-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, delta-tocopherol, gamma-tocopherol, alpha-tocopherol, retinol, and retinyl palmitate for 2 types of sample preparation--extraction and saponification. The assigned values were based on the agreement of measurements made by NIST and collaborating laboratories. The Certificate of Analysis also provides reference and information values for concentrations of proximates, minerals, and additional vitamins; assignment of these values is discussed in a companion paper (this issue, page 276).     

Certification of the methylmercury content in SRM 2977 Mussel Tissue (organic contaminants and trace elements) and SRM 1566b Oyster Tissue

The methylmercury content in two new marine bivalve mollusk tissue Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) has been certified using results of analyses from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and two other laboratories. The certified concentrations of methylmercury were established based on the results from four and six different (independent) analytical methods, respectively, for SRM 1566b Oyster Tissue (13.2 ± 0.7 μg/kg) and SRM 2977 Mussel Tissue (organic contaminants and trace elements) (36.2 ± 1.7 μg/kg). The certified concentration of methylmercury in SRM 1566b is among the lowest in any certified reference material (CRM).