On the maximal difference between an element and its inverse modulo n

Periodica Mathematica Hungarica -     

On the difference between an integer and its inverse modulon (Ⅱ)

The main purpose of this paper is using the mean value theorem of Dirichlet L-functions to studythe asymptotic property of one class of number-theoretic functions, and give an interesting mean square valueformula.     

On the difference between an integer and its inverse modulo n(II)

The main purpose of this paper is using the mean value theorem of Dirichlet L-functions to study the asymptotic property of one class of number-theoretic functions, and give an interesting mean square value formula.     

Hybrid mean value on the difference between an integer and its inverse modulo q

The main purpose of this paper is to study the asymptotic property of one class of number-theoretic functions and give a sharp hybrid mean-value formula by using the generalized Bernoulli numbers, Gauss sums and the mean-value theorems of Dirichlet L-functions.     

On an inverse problem for non-selfadjoint difference operators

We recover the coefficients in certain difference expressions in terms of a known generalized spectral function of Marchenko type.Translated from Matematicheskie Zametki, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 661–668, June, 1972.     

On the difference between an integer and its m-th power mod n

For any real constants λ ₁, λ ₂ ∈ (0, 1], let $n \geqslant \max \{ [\tfrac{1} {{\lambda _1 }}],[\tfrac{1} {{\lambda _2 }}]\} $ , m ? 2 be integers. Suppose integers a ∈ [1, λ ₁ n] and b ∈ [1, λ ₂ n] satisfy the congruence b ≡ a ^m (mod n). The main purpose of this paper is to study the mean value of (a ? b)^2k for any fixed positive integer k and obtain some sharp asymptotic formulae.     

On rings in which every maximal one-sided ideal contains a maximal ideal

Given a ring R, consider the condition: (^*) every maximal right ideal of R contains a maximal ideal of R. We show that, for a ring R and 0 ≠ e ² = e ∈ R such that ele ? eRe every proper ideal I of R R satisfies (^*) if and only if eRe satisfies (^*). Hence with the help of some other results, (^*) is a Morita invariant property. For a simple ring R R[x] satisfies (^*) if and only if R[x] is not right primitive. By this result, if R is a division ring and R[x] satisfies (^*), then the Jacobson conjecture holds. We also show that for a finite centralizing extension S of a ring R R satisfies (^*) if and only if S satisfies (^*).     

On maximal commutative subrings of non-commutative rings

We observe that every non-commutative unital ring has at least three maximal commutative subrings. In particular, non-commutative rings (resp., finite non-commutative rings) in which there are exactly three (resp., four) maximal commutative subrings are characterized. If R has acc or dcc on its commutative subrings containing the center, whose intersection with the nontrivial summands is trivial, then R is Dedekind-finite. It is observed that every Artinian commutative ring R, is a finite intersection of some Artinian commutative subrings of a non-commutative ring, in each of which, R is a maximal subring. The intersection of maximal ideals of all the maximal commutative subrings in a non-commutative local ring R, is a maximal ideal in the center of R. A ring R with no nontrivial idempotents, is either a division ring or a right ue-ring (i.e., a ring with a unique proper essential right ideal) if and only if every maximal commutative subring of R is either a field or a ue-ring whose socle is the contraction of that of R. It is proved that a maximal commutative subring of a duo ue-ring with finite uniform dimension is a finite direct product of rings, all of which are fields, except possibly one, which is a local ring whose unique maximal ideal is of square zero. Analogues of Jordan-Hölder Theorem (resp., of the existence of the Loewy chain for Artinian modules) is proved for rings with acc and dcc (resp., with dcc) on commutative subrings containing the center. A semiprime ring R has only finitely many maximal commutative subrings if and only if R has a maximal commutative subring of finite index. Infinite prime rings have infinitely many maximal commutative subrings.     

On forward-order law for core inverse in rings

Aequationes mathematicae - This article establishes a few sufficient conditions of the forward-order law for the core inverse of elements in rings with involution. It also presents the...     

On some nonlinear problems induced by an abstract maximal element principle

In this paper, by applying an abstract maximal element principle on quasi-ordered sets established by Lin and Du, we obtain a generalized Brézis–Browder principle, system (vectorial) versions of Ekeland's variational principle and maximal element principle and a vectorial version of Takahashi's nonconvex minimization theorem. Moreover, we investigate the equivalence between scalar versions and vectorial versions of these results.     

On maximal stable orders on an inverse semigroup of finite rank with zero

We consider maximal stable orders on semigroups that belong to a certain class of inverse semigroups of finite rank. Translated from Ukrains'kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal, Vol. 60, No. 8, pp. 1035–1041, August, 2008.     

On isomorphisms between deformation rings and Hecke rings

Inventiones mathematicae -     

Gorenstein rings and inverse polynomials

We characterize left perfect rings using locally, finitely projective and flat covers, thus answering a question of Xue in the positive.     

On the non-existence of maximal difference matrices of deficiency 1

A \(k\times u\lambda \) matrix \(M=[d_{ij}]\) with entries from a group \(U\) of order \(u\) is called a \((u,k,\lambda )\) -difference matrix over \(U\) if the list of quotients \(d_{i\ell }{d_{j\ell }}^{-1}, 1 \le \ell \le u\lambda ,\) contains each element of \(U\) exactly \(\lambda \) times for all \(i\ne j.\) Jungnickel has shown that \(k \le u\lambda \) and it is conjectured that the equality holds only if \(U\) is a \(p\) -group for a prime \(p.\) On the other hand, Winterhof has shown that some known results on the non-existence of \((u,u\lambda ,\lambda )\) -difference matrices are extended to \((u,u\lambda -1,\lambda )\) -difference matrices. This fact suggests us that there is a close connection between these two cases. In this article we show that any \((u,u\lambda -1,\lambda )\) -difference matrix over an abelian \(p\) -group can be extended to a \((u,u\lambda ,\lambda )\) -difference matrix.