牛肉中7种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定

建立了牛肉组织中胺菊酯、氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯、氟胺氰菊酯、氰戊菊酯、氟氯苯氰菊酯、氯菊酯7种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的超高效液相色谱-串联质谱测定方法,样品经乙腈提取后,吹干提取液,用正己烷溶解,氟罗里硅土固相萃取柱净化,经BEHC18色谱柱分离,以0.1%甲酸的甲醇溶液和0.1%乙酸铵溶液为流动相进行洗脱。电喷雾正离子模式(ESI+)电离,多反应监测模式(MRM)检测,外标法定量。结果表明,7种拟除虫菊酯类农药标准溶液在10～1000μg/L范围内呈良好线性,r2均大于0.998;方法检出限为5μg/kg,定量下限为10μg/kg;7种拟除虫菊酯农药在10～50μg/kg添加水平内的回收率为81%～116%,批内、批间RSD均小于15%。该方法具有简便快捷、灵敏度高、定性准确等优点,能满足食品安全检测有关法规的要求。     

中空纤维膜液相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定水样中拟除虫菊酯类农药

提出了气相色谱-质谱法测定水中的拟除虫菊酯类农药胺菊酯、甲氰菊酯、氯菊酯的方法。样品采用中空纤维膜液相微萃取法萃取,以甲苯为萃取剂,于35℃在600r.min-1转速下萃取20min。在优化的试验条件下,胺菊酯、甲氰菊酯和氯菊酯的富集倍数分别为292,63,76倍。3种拟除虫菊酯类农药的响应信号值与其质量浓度在一定的线性范围呈线性关系,检出限(3S/N)均小于0.5μg.L-1。方法用于分析实际水样,回收率为92.4%～98.0%,相对标准偏差(n=6)为1.9%～8.6%。     

气相色谱法测烟草中拟除虫菊酯和有机磷类农残

建立了一种测定烟草中拟除虫菊酯类农药和有机磷类农药残留量的气相色谱法.用普通的聚苯乙烯凝胶柱代替昂贵的凝胶渗透色谱仪;层析柱填料用弗罗里硅土代替硅胶;用工作标准溶液过柱曲线作为标准曲线;有机磷类农药气相检测器用PFPD代替FPD.方法的检测量为0.01μg/g～0.04 μg/g,平均加标回收率为70.18%～95.86%,RSD为4.36﹪～9.96﹪,对样品进行了拟除虫菊酯类农药和有机磷类农药残留量的测定,结果满意.     

分散液-液微萃取-气相色谱法快速检测番茄中3种拟除虫菊酯类农药

建立了快速(quick)、简单(easy)、便宜(cheap)、有效(effective)、可靠(rugged)和安全(safe)(QuEChERS)的分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)-气相色谱快速测定番茄中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的方法。样品经乙腈提取,N-丙基乙二胺(PSA)净化,采用DLLME富集,用气相色谱法分析。考察了联苯菊酯、甲氰菊酯和氟氰菊酯在番茄中的残留测定,同时考察了萃取剂种类与体积、分散剂体积以及萃取时间等因素对萃取效率的影响,以40 μL氯仿为萃取剂,1000 μL乙腈为分散剂,萃取时间为60 s。结果表明: 3种拟除虫菊酯类农药在番茄中的检出限分别为0.5、0.5、0.3 μg/kg。在1、10和50 μg/kg添加水平下,联苯菊酯、甲氰菊酯和氟氰菊酯在番茄中的平均回收率分别为89%～109%、92.5%～105%和90%～108%,相对标准偏差分别为2.5%～7.6%、2.8%～5.7%、3.8%～9.1%。该方法简便、快速、安全、价格低廉,重现性好,可用于番茄中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

气相色谱法测定果蔬中5种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

建立快速、准确测定果蔬中5种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留量的方法。采用漩涡振荡提取农药残留,固相萃取柱净化,毛细管柱气相色谱法-μECD检测器测定。该法可同时分离检测5种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留,检出限为0.001～0.005μg/mL。拟除虫菊酯类农药残留量在0.01～1μg/mL范围内与色谱峰高线性关系良好,相关系数大于0.9998。测定结果的相对标准偏差为4.8%～10.5%(n=6),回收率为89.9%～105.0%。     

基质固相分散萃取-分散液相微萃取-气相色谱质谱法测定土壤中拟除虫菊酯类农药

建立了基质固相分散萃取-分散液相微萃取-气相色谱质谱法测定土壤中3种拟除虫菊酯农药(胺菊酯、氯菊酯、溴氰菊酯)的分析方法。最佳前处理条件为:0.5 g样品与1.5 g C18固相萃取粉末研磨5 min,混合物以10 m L丙酮洗脱并浓缩至0.4 m L,加入20μL四氯化碳和5 m L超纯水形成乳化,离心破乳后吸取1μL沉积相进GC-MS分析。3种拟除虫菊酯类农药在5~200μg/kg范围内有良好的线性关系(r2≥0.9989),平均加标回收率为86.5%~108.0%,相对标准偏差小于7.8%(n=3),检出限为1.00~1.48μg/kg,可满足土壤中微量拟除虫菊酯类农药的分析。     

分散固相萃取/分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定甘蓝中的拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取方法,建立了气相色谱法快速检测甘蓝中氟氯氰菊酯、氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯及氰戊菊酯4种拟除虫菊酯农药残留量的分析方法。使用乙腈作为萃取溶剂,经乙二胺-Ｎ-丙基硅烷固相萃取吸附剂净化提取液,分散液液微萃取将农药富集到50 μL二甲苯中后,采用气相色谱-电子捕获检测器进行分析。考察了萃取溶剂的种类与体积、分散剂体积及盐效应等因素对分散液液微萃取萃取效率的影响。结果表明：除氟氯氰菊酯在 0.01~0.1 mg/L范围外,其余3种拟除虫菊酯农药均在 0.01~5.0 mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数为0.997 9~0.999 2;加标浓度为0.02~0.5 μg/g时,除氟氯氰菊酯外其他拟除虫菊酯农药的平均回收率为81.9%~93.5%,相对标准偏差为9.5%~20.7%。该方法简单、高效、重现性好、富集倍数高,可用于甘蓝中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

分散固相萃取/分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定甘蓝中的拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

采用分散固相萃取和分散液液微萃取方法,建立了气相色谱法快速检测甘蓝中氟氯氰菊酯、氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯及氰戊菊酯4种拟除虫菊酯农药残留量的分析方法。使用乙腈作为萃取溶剂,经乙二胺-N-丙基硅烷固相萃取吸附剂净化提取液,分散液液微萃取将农药富集到50μL二甲苯中后,采用气相色谱-电子捕获检测器进行分析。考察了萃取溶剂的种类与体积、分散剂体积及盐效应等因素对分散液液微萃取萃取效率的影响。结果表明:除氟氯氰菊酯在0.01~0.1 mg/L范围外,其余3种拟除虫菊酯农药均在0.01~5.0mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数为0.997 9~0.999 2;加标浓度为0.02~0.5μg/g时,除氟氯氰菊酯外其他拟除虫菊酯农药的平均回收率为81.9%~93.5%,相对标准偏差为9.5%~20.7%。该方法简单、高效、重现性好、富集倍数高,可用于甘蓝中拟除虫菊酯类农药的快速检测。     

气相色谱-负化学源质谱法测定蔬菜中17种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留量

建立了气相色谱-负化学源质谱检测蔬菜中17种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留量的方法。样品中的目标物经乙腈提取后,用乙二胺-N-丙基甲硅烷(PSA)和石墨化炭黑填料进行分散固相萃取净化,气相色谱-负化学源质谱选择离子监测模式测定,同位素内标法定量。在甜豌豆、绿花菜和大葱基质中均未见干扰所有农药测定的现象。17种拟除虫菊酯类农药的定量限均为0.02～5 μg/kg。在10、20、30和100 μg/kg等4个添加水平下,所有农药的回收率均为71.0%～139.0%,相对标准偏差≤12.8%。该方法可作为蔬菜中17种菊酯类农残检测的确证方法。     

电纺纳米纤维固相萃取拟除虫菊酯的研究

将电纺纳米纤维用于萃取分离拟除虫菊酯农药.实验发现电纺纳米纤维对甲氰菊酯、高效氯氟氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯、氰戊菊酯、氯菊酯和联苯菊酯农药有较好的吸附能力,对6种拟除虫菊酯农药的最大吸附容量分别为5.4、5.8、6.0、6.5、6.5和8.0μg/mg.应用电纺纳米纤维固相萃取一高败液相同时测定蔬菜样品中6种拟除虫菊酯农药.在优化实验条件下,6种拟除虫菊酯类农药分离效果较好,并在(0.01～0.04)～10mg/L浓度范围内与峰面积呈良好的线性关系(r2=0.9995～0.9999);方法的最小检测限为5～12μg/L,其加标回收率在85.8%～96.6%之间.     

快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱法同时测定含脂羊毛中的28种有机氯拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂的残留量

建立了快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱法同时测定含脂羊毛中28种有机氯、拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂残留量的方法。在80 ℃、10.34 MPa条件下用正己烷饱和的乙腈快速提取样品,提取物经冷冻除脂、浓缩、固相萃取净化处理后直接用气相色谱分析。结果表明:16种有机氯杀虫剂在0.005～1.0 mg/L范围内,9种拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂及三氯杀螨醇、三氯杀螨砜在0.01～2.0 mg/L范围内,氟氯苯菊酯在0.02～4.0 mg/L范围内,其峰面积与质量浓度呈良好的线性关系。28种有机氯、拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂的平均回收率为67.2%～107.7%,相对标准偏差为2.6%～29.0%。结果表明：该方法具有操作简便、快速方便、灵敏度高等特点,完全可满足含脂羊毛中28种有机氯拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂残留量初筛检测的要求。     

加速溶剂萃取-固相萃取净化-气相色谱-串联质谱法检测茶叶中9种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

建立了加速溶剂萃取（ASE）-固相萃取净化（SPE）-气相色谱-串联质谱（GC-MS/MS）同时测定茶叶中9种拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的方法。ASE萃取溶剂为丙酮-正己烷（1：1,v/v）,萃取温度为100℃,萃取压力为10 MPa,加热时间为3 min,静态萃取时间为5 min,循环1次,冲洗体积为40%萃取池体积,氮气吹扫100 s。萃取结束后用Cleanert TPT固相萃取柱净化,净化液浓缩定容后,采用GC-MS/MS测定,外标法定量。9种拟除虫菊酯类农药在2~1000 μg/L范围内呈现良好的线性关系,相关系数（r²）均大于0.99,方法检出限为0.2~4.5 μg/kg,定量限为0.8~15.0 μg/kg。在绿茶、红茶空白基质中做加标回收试验,添加水平为0.02、0.1、0.4 mg/kg以及定量限水平,得到的平均回收率为69.87%~110.0%,相对标准偏差（RSD）为0.7%~11.2%。该方法背景干扰低、灵敏度高、重现性好、回收率稳定,适用于茶叶中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留量的检测。     

超声提取-超声波辅助固相微萃取色谱法测定蔬菜中的有机氯、菊酯类农药残留量

建立了一种USE-SPME-GC联用测定蔬菜中有机氯和菊酯类农药残留量的新方法,并对分析条件进行优化和探讨,实验表明,萃取液中基体杂质和色素对分析结果干扰较大,我们提出稀释的方法较好的解决这个问题。对实际蔬菜样品进行了测定和分析。     

加速溶剂萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定茶叶中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留

建立了加速溶剂萃取（ASE）-超高效液相色谱（UPLC）-串联质谱法（MS/MS）测定茶叶中拟除虫菊酯类农药残留的方法。ASE萃取温度为80 ℃，萃取压力为10.34 MPa，以正己烷-丙酮（2∶1，v/v）为溶剂静态萃取5 min，循环一次。萃取液浓缩后经GCB/NH₂-Florisil柱净化，UPLC分离，MS/MS正离子扫描（ESI⁺）、多反应离子监测（MRM）模式进行分析，外标法定量。线性回归分析表明：10种拟除虫菊酯的浓度与其峰面积的线性关系显著，相关系数（r）均不小于0.9995，检出限（LOD）在0.5~5.0 μg/kg之间，定量限（LOQ）在1.6~16.6 μg/kg之间；在定量限、0.4 mg/kg以及最高残留限量（MRL，无MRL的加入1 mg/kg）3个水平进行添加回收试验（n=7），回收率为68.7%~103.8%，RSD为0.8%~13.2%。该方法前处理简单，耗时短，灵敏度和准确度高，可满足茶叶中痕量拟除虫菊酯类农药残留测定的要求。     

Rapid analysis of pyrethroid insecticides in aquaculture seawater samples via membrane-assisted solvent extraction coupled with gas chromatography-electron capture detection

A simple, efficient, and environmentally friendly membrane-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) method for the extraction and preconcentration of six pyrethroid insecticides from aquaculture seawater samples followed by gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) was successfully proposed. The operating conditions for MASE, such as the extraction solvent, solvent volume, NaCl concentration, stirring rate, extraction time, and temperature, were optimized. Compared to conventional Florisil-solid phase extraction (SPE), higher extraction recoveries (85.9% to 105.9%) of three spiked levels of the six pyrethroid pesticides in aquaculture seawater were obtained using MASE, and the RSD values were lower than 7.9%. The limits of detection (LOD, signal-to-noise ratio (S/N)=3) and quantification (LOQ, S/N = 10) were in the range of 0.037-0.166 and 0.12-0.55 μg L(-1), respectively. The results demonstrate the excellent applicability of the MASE method in analyzing the six pyrethroid pesticides in aqueous samples. The proposed method exhibited a high potential for routine monitoring analysis of pyrethroid insecticides in seawater samples.     

A solid phase extraction method for the screening and determination of pyrethroid metabolites and organochlorine pesticides in human urine.

A screening method has been developed for the determination of 23 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and 3-pyrethroid metabolities [cis- and trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-(1-cyclopropane) carboxylic acid, cis-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-(1-cyclopropane) carboxylic acid and 3-phenoxybenzoic acid] from human urine. OCPs were directly detected in urine samples while pyrethroid metabolites required acid-induced hydrolysis to convert their conjugates into free acids; all compounds were then cleaned-up/preconcentrated using solid phase extraction. Determination and quantitation was achieved by gas chromatography with a mass spectrometer detector operating in selected ion monitoring mode. Limits of detection varied between 0.1 and 0.3 ng/mL with linear ranges from 0.3 to 700 ng/mL; the precision of the method was high (4.3-7.2%). Recoveries of all analytes from urine samples fortified at levels of 30 ng/mL for each OCP and 15 ng/mL for each pyrethroid metabolite ranged from 88 to 101% (captan gave the lowest recovery). The results obtained from the analysis of real urine samples show the suitability of the proposed method for monitoring people exposed to organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides.     

Solid‐phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of pyrethroid pesticides in wheat and maize samples

A rapid, selective and sensitive sample preparation method based on solid‐phase extraction combined with the dispersive liquid–liquid microextration was developed for the determination of pyrethroid pesticides in wheat and maize samples. Initially, the samples were extracted with acetonitrile and water solution followed phase separation with the salt addition. The following sample preparation involves a solid‐phase extraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction step, which effectively provide cleanup and enrichment effects. The main experimental factors affecting the performance both of solid‐phase extraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextration were investigated. The validation results indicated the suitability of the proposed method for routine analyze of pyrethroid pesticides in wheat and maize samples. The fortified recoveries at three levels ranged between 76.4 and 109.8% with relative standard deviations of less than 10.7%. The limit of quantification of the proposed method was below 0.0125 mg/kg for the pyrethoroid pesticides. The proposed method was successfully used for the rapid determination of pyrethroid residues in real wheat and maize samples from crop field in Beijing, China.     

固相萃取-在线凝胶渗透色谱-气相色谱/质谱法测定松子仁中的28种有机氯农药和拟除虫菊酯农药

建立了松子仁中28种有机氯农药和拟除虫菊酯农药多残留的在线凝胶渗透色谱-气相色谱/质谱（GPC-GC/MS）分析方法。样品以乙腈-水(体积比为4∶1)为提取剂高速匀浆提取,提取液经Aluminium-N固相萃取柱净化,除去样品中大部分的脂肪和甾醇等干扰基质,再经在线GPC进一步除去样液中的色素和脂肪等大分子干扰物质,有效地降低了样品复杂基质带来的背景干扰。加标水平为0.05 mg/kg时,大部分农药的回收率为70%～120%,相对标准偏差小于15%。28种农药的检出限为0.002～0.05 mg/kg。采用外标法定量,方法的线性关系和回收率结果均令人满意。实验证明,该方法是一种快速、准确、灵敏度高的同时检测松子仁中农药多残留的检测方法。     

亚临界水萃取及气相色谱-串联质谱法检测红茶中多种农药残留

建立了亚临界水萃取及气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)检测红茶中21种有机氯和拟除虫菊酯农药残留的方法。在萃取压力为5 MPa条件下,样品经150 ℃的亚临界水提取15 min后,将目标物转移至丙酮-正己烷(1:1, v/v)中,经ENVI-Carb固相萃取净化小柱净化,DB-5毛细管气相色谱柱分离,在多反应监测(MRM)模式下进行MS/MS检测,基质匹配溶液内标法定量。各目标物在5.0～320.0 μg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.99,其定量限(信噪比(S/N)＞10)为50 ng/g,检出限(S/N＞3)为10 ng/g。茶叶基质中添加50、100和200 ng/g的标准品时,21种农药的回收率为70.18%～119.98%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为5.01%～11.76%。该方法的灵敏度、准确度和精密度均符合农药残留测定的技术要求,适用于红茶中有机氯和拟除虫菊酯农药残留的检测。     

Analysis of sediment-associated insecticides using ultrasound assisted microwave extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

An ultrasound assisted microwave extraction (UAME) method was developed to simultaneously extract five organophosphate (OP) and eight pyrethroid insecticides from sediment. The optimized UAME conditions were to use 100 ml of a mixture of hexane and acetone (1:1, v/v) solution as the extraction solvents, and extraction time, microwave and ultrasonic power settings of 6 min, 100 W and 50 W, respectively. Extracts were cleaned using solid phase extraction and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in negative chemical ionization mode and quantification was based on matrix-matched standard solutions along with internal standard calibration. At the spiked concentrations of 1, 5 and 20 ng/g dry weight (dw), recoveries of OPs were 77.6-122%, 65.2-128% and 75.6-141% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 10.6-18.1%, 3.1-12.5% and 8.0-35.3%, respectively, while recoveries of pyrethroids were 78.0-101%, 76.4-104% and 71.0-99.5% with RSDs of 10.3-23.5%, 4.7-17.6% and 8.8-18.7%, respectively. Method detection limits ranged from 0.31 to 0.45 ng/g dw for the OP insecticides and from 0.27 to 0.70 ng/g dw for the pyrethroid insecticides. The newly developed UAME method was validated by comparing it to Soxhlet and sonication extraction methods. Better recoveries were achieved for most OPs by the novel UAME method, whereas there was no significant difference in recoveries for most of the pyrethroids. Finally, the UAME method was used to quantify the target insecticides in field-contaminated sediment samples which were collected in Guangzhou, China.