Development of a new and environment friendly hollow fiber-supported liquid phase microextraction using vesicular aggregate-based supramolecular solvent

Hollow fiber-based liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME) using conventional solvents is limited by their relative instability and high volatility. The use of supramolecular solvents as a liquid membrane phase could overcome these inconveniences due to their negligible vapour pressure and high viscosity. In the present study, a novel and highly flexible method was developed based on supramolecular solvents constructed of vesicles of decanoic acid, which were used for the first time as a solvent in HF-LPME. This solvent is produced from the coacervation of decanoic acid aqueous vesicles by the action of tetrabutylammonium (Bu(4)N(+)). In this work, halogenated anilines as model compounds were extracted from water samples into a supramolecular solvent impregnated in the pores and also filled inside the porous polypropylene hollow fiber membrane. The extracted anilines were separated and determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The technique requires minimal sample preparation time and toxic organic solvent consumption, and provides a significant advantage over conventional analytical methods. The important parameters influencing the extraction efficiency were studied and optimized utilizing two different optimization methods: one variable at a time and the Box-Behnken design. Under the optimum conditions, the preconcentration factors were in the range of 74 to 203. Linearity of the method was obtained in the range of 1.0-100 μg L(-1) with the correlation coefficients of determination (R(2)) ranging from 0.9901 to 0.9986. The limits of detection for the target anilines were 0.5-1.0 μg L(-1). The relative standard deviations varied from 3.9% to 6.0%. The relative recoveries of the three halogenated anilines from water samples at a spiking level of 20.0 μg L(-1) were in the range of 90.4-107.4%.     

Ultrasound-assisted liquid-phase microextraction based on a nanostructured supramolecular solvent

Novel ultrasonically enhanced supramolecular solvent microextraction (USESSM) then high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection have been used for extraction and determination of phthalates in water and cosmetics. Coacervates consisting of decanoic acid-based nano-structured aggregates, specifically reverse micelles, have been used the first time as solvents for ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction (USAEME). Sonication accelerated mass transfer of the target analytes into the nano-structured solvent from the aqueous sample, thus reducing extraction time. Several conditions affecting extraction efficiency, for example the concentrations of major components of the supramolecular solvent (tetrahydrofuran and decanoic acid), sample solution pH, salt addition, and ultrasonication time, were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, preconcentration of the analytes ranged from 176 to 412-fold and the linear range was 0.5–100 μg?L^?1, with correlation coefficients (R ²)?≥?0.9984. The detection sensitivity of the method was excellent, with limits of detection (LOD, S/N?=?3) in the range 0.10–0.70 μg?L^?1 and precision in the range 4.1–11.7 % (RSD, n?=?5). This method was successfully used for analysis of phthalates in water and cosmetics, with good recovery of spiked phthalates (91.0–108.5 %).     

Microwave-assisted extraction combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction as a new approach to determination of chlorophenols in soil and sediments

A new method was applied for extraction of five chlorophenols from soil and marine sediment samples. Microwave-assisted extraction coupled with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by semi-automated in-syringe back-extraction technique was used as an extraction technique. Microwave-assisted extraction was performed by using 2.0 mL of alkaline water at pH 10.0. After extraction, the pH of extraction solution was adjusted at 6.0 and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure was done using 1.0 mL of acetone as a disperser solvent and 37.0 μL of chlorobenzene as extraction solvent. About 20.0 ± 0.5 μL sedimented phase was collected after centrifugation step. Then, chlorophenols were back extracted into 20 μL of alkaline water at pH 12.0 within the microsyringe. Finally, 20.0 μL of aqueous solution was injected into high performance liquid chromatography with ultra violet detection for analysis. The obtained recovery and preconcentration factors for the analytes were in the range of 68.0-82.0% and 25-30, respectively, with relative standard deviations ≤7.6%. The limits of the detection were found in the range of 0.0005-0.002 mg/kg. The method provides a simple and fast procedure for the extraction and determination of chlorophenols in soil and marine sediment samples.     

Ultrasound‐assisted supramolecular‐solvent‐based microextraction combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography for the analysis of chlorophenols in environmental water samples

An efficient, inexpensive and environmentally benign ultrasound‐assisted supramolecular‐solvent‐based microextraction technique combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography was used for the determination of chlorophenols in environmental water samples. Different factors such as amount of decanoic acid, volume of tetrahydrofuran, pH of the sample, ultrasound time and ionic strength were investigated and optimized. The optimized extraction conditions were 60 mg decanoic acid, 1.5 mL tetrahydrofuran, 3 min ultrasound time, without salt addition. Under this condition, the extraction recoveries were 83.0–89.3 with preconcentration factors of 94–102. The calibration curves were linear from 5.0–400.0 ng/mL with square of the correlation coefficient higher than 0.9998 and the limits of detection were between 1.5–2.0 ng/mL. The values of intra‐ and inter‐day relative standard deviations were 3.2–6.0 and 7.3–8.0%, respectively. Analysis of different samples showed that the concentration of 2,5‐dichlorophenol in Babolrood river water was 80.6 ng/mL.     

Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet combined with HPLC-UV for the analysis of antidepressant drugs in biological samples

Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic droplet combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-ultra violet (HPLC-UV) detection was applied for the extraction and determination of fluoxetine, citalopram, and venlafaxine as antidepressants drugs in biological samples. In total, 30 μL of undecanol was injected slowly into a glass-centrifuge tube containing 5 mL alkaline sample solution that was located inside the ultrasonic water bath. The formed emulsion was centrifuged and the fine droplets of solvent were floated at the top of the test tube. The test tube was then cooled in an ice bath and the solidified solvent transferred into a conical vial; it melted quickly at room temperature. Then the analysis of the extracts was carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography. Under optimal conditions, the preconcentration factors were between 174 and 316. Detection limits (LODs) of 3 μg/L were obtained and the calibration graphs were linear within the range of 10-1000 μg/L. Finally, the feasibility of the proposed method was successfully confirmed by extraction and determination of the antidepressant drugs in human urine and plasma samples in the range of microgram per liter and suitable results were obtained.     

Supramolecular-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction: a novel sample preparation technique utilizes coacervates and reverse micelles

The present study reports a novel sample enrichment method termed supramolecular-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (SM-DLLME). The SM solvent selected was made up of reversed micelles of decanoic acid dispersed in tetrahydrofuran (THF)-water. THF plays double role, not only acts as a disperser solvent but also causes self-assembly of decanoic acid. The contaminant used as a model was Malachite Green (MG). It was a cationic dye and was preconcentrated without any derivatization or ion-pair formation reaction. In SM-DLLME, the most important advantages of DLLME technique and preconcentration strategy based on the coacervation and reverse micelles have come together. Moreover, in this method, disadvantages of DLLME such as extraction capability of only hydrophobic analytes and hiring toxic and hazardous organic solvents as the extraction solvent and disadvantages of coacervation-based extraction method such as tedious, labor-intensive and time-consuming stirring procedure have been avoided. Several variables affecting the microextraction efficiency were investigated and optimized. Under the optimized conditions and preconcentration of only 5.00 mL of sample, the enhancement factor was 52, limit of detection (LOD) was 4 μg/L and relative standard deviations (RSDs) for 145 and 36 μg/L of MG in textile industry wastewater were 1.8 and 3.2%, respectively (n = 6).     

Preconcentration and determination of methyl methacrylate by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction

This article describes the preconcentration of methyl methacrylate in produced water by the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using extraction solvents lighter than water followed by gas chromatography. In the present experiments, 0.4 mL dispersive solvent (ethanol) containing 15.0 μL extraction solvent (toluene) was rapidly injected into the samples and followed by centrifuging and direct injection into the gas chromatograph equipped with flame ionization detector. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were evaluated and optimized including toluene (as extraction solvent), ethanol (as dispersive solvent), 15 μL and 0.4 mL (as the volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, respectively), pH 7, 20% ionic strength, and extraction's temperature and time of 20°C and 10 min, respectively. Under the optimum conditions, the figures of merits were determined to be LOD = 10 μg/L, dynamic range = 20–180 μg/L, RSD = 11% (n = 6). The maximum recovery under the optimized condition was determined to be 79.4%.     

Trace determination of dichlorvos in environmental samples by room temperature ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid-phase microextraction combined with HPLC

Using 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexa?uorophosphate ([BMIM][PF6]) room temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) as extraction solvent, tetrahydrofuran (THF) as disperser solvent, the organophosphorus pesticide dichlorvos in water was determined by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with high-performance liquid chromatography. Factors affecting RTIL-DLLME (type of disperser solvent, amount of RTIL, volume of disperser solvent, percentage of NaCl and volume and pH of water sample) were optimized by the single-factor method, obtaining the most favorable results when using 65 μL of [BMIM][PF6] and 260 μL of THF to extract the compound from an 8-mL water sample at pH 5.0 containing 25% (w/v) of NaCl. Under these optimum conditions, an enrichment factor of 215-fold was obtained. The calibration curves were linear in the concentration range of 2-1,000 μg/L. The limit of detection calculated at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 was 0.2 μg/L. The relative standard deviations (RSD) for six replicate experiments at 20, 100 and 200 μg/L concentration levels were 1.8%, 1.3% and 1.3 %, respectively. Then the proposed method was applied to the analysis of three different water sample sources (tap, farm and rain water) and the relative recoveries and RSD of spiked water samples were 95.6-102.4% and 0.6-3.1%, respectively, at three different concentration levels of 20, 100 and 200 μg/L.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in water samples

A novel, simple and efficient dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet (DLLME-SFO) technique coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed for the determination of triclosan and its degradation product 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples. The extraction solvent used in this work is of low density, low volatility, low toxicity and proper melting point around room temperature. The extractant droplets can be collected easily by solidifying it at a lower temperature. Parameters that affect the extraction efficiency, including type and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, salt effect, pH and extraction time, were investigated and optimized in a 5 mL sample system by HPLC-UV. Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent: 12 μL of 1-dodecanol; dispersive solvent: 300 of μL acetonitrile; sample pH: 6.0; extraction time: 1 min), the limits of detection (LODs) of the pretreatment method combined with LC-MS/MS were in the range of 0.002-0.02 μg L(-1) which are lower than or comparable with other reported approaches applied to the determination of the same compounds. Wide linearities, good precisions and satisfactory relative recoveries were also obtained. The proposed technique was successfully applied to determine triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples.     

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of three carbamate pesticides in water samples

A simple, rapid and efficient method, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) in conjunction with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), has been developed for the determination of three carbamate pesticides (methomyl, carbofuran and carbaryl) in water samples. In this extraction process, a mixture of 35 µL chlorobenzene (extraction solvent) and 1.0 mL acetonitrile (disperser solvent) was rapidly injected into the 5.0 mL aqueous sample containing the analytes. After centrifuging (5 min at 4000 rpm), the fine droplets of chlorobenzene were sedimented in the bottom of the conical test tube. Sedimented phase (20 µL) was injected into the HPLC for analysis. Some important parameters, such as kind and volume of extraction and disperser solvent, extraction time and salt addition were investigated and optimised. Under the optimum extraction condition, the enrichment factors and extraction recoveries ranged from 148% to 189% and 74.2% to 94.4%, respectively. The methods yielded a linear range in the concentration from 1 to 1000 µg L^?1 for carbofuran and carbaryl, 5 to 1000 µg L^?1 for methomyl, and the limits of detection were 0.5, 0.9 and 0.1 µg L^?1, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD) for the extraction of 500 µg L^?1 carbamate pesticides were in the range of 1.8–4.6% (n = 6). This method could be successfully applied for the determination of carbamate pesticides in tap water, river water and rain water.     

Vortex‐assisted liquid–liquid microextraction using a low‐toxicity solvent for the determination of five organophosphorus pesticides in water samples by high‐performance liquid chromatography

Vortex‐assisted liquid–liquid microextraction followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography with UV detection was applied to determine Isocarbophos, Parathion‐methyl, Triazophos, Phoxim and Chlorpyrifos‐methyl in water samples. 1‐Bromobutane was used as the extraction solvent, which has a higher density than water and low toxicity. Centrifugation and disperser solvent were not required in this microextraction procedure. The optimum extraction conditions for 15 mL water sample were: pH of the sample solution, 5; volume of the extraction solvent, 80 μL; vortex time, 2 min; salt addition, 0.5 g. Under the optimum conditions, enrichment factors ranging from 196 to 237 and limits of detection below 0.38 μg/L were obtained for the determination of target pesticides in water. Good linearities (r > 0.9992) were obtained within the range of 1–500 μg/L for all the compounds. The relative standard deviations were in the range of 1.62–2.86% and the recoveries of spiked samples ranged from 89.80 to 104.20%. The whole proposed methodology is simple, rapid, sensitive and environmentally friendly for determining traces of organophosphorus pesticides in the water samples.     

Simple, rapid, and sensitive determination of beta-blockers in environmental water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

A novel method, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection is proposed for the determination of three beta-blockers (metoprolol, bisoprolol, and betaxolol) in ground water, river water, and bottled mineral water. Some important parameters, such as the kind and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, extraction time, pH, and salt effect were investigated and optimized. In the method, a suitable mixture of extraction solvent (60 μL carbon tetrachloride) and dispersive solvent (1 mL acetonitrile) were injected into the aqueous samples (5.00 mL) and the cloudy solution was observed. After centrifugation, the enriched analytes in the bottom CCl(4) phase were determined by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors (EFs) for metoprolol, bisoprolol, and betaxolol were 180, 190, and 182, and the limits of detection (LODs) were 1.8, 1.4, and 1.0 ng L(-1) , respectively. A good linear relationship between the peak area and the concentration of analytes was obtained in the range of 3-150 ng L(-1) . The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the extraction of 10 ng L(-1) of beta-blockers were in the range of 4.6-5.7% (n = 5). Compared with other methods, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction is a very simple, rapid, sensitive (low limit of detection), and economical (only 1.06 mL volume of organic solvent) method, which is in compliance with the requirements of green analytical methodologies.     

Pressurized Liquid Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid‐liquid Micro‐extraction as an Efficient Sample Preparation Method for Determination of Volatile Components in Tobacco

The pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by dispersive liquid–liquid micro‐extraction (DLLME) has been developed for extraction of volatile components in tobacco. 35 volatile components were detected by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Methanol–methyl tert‐butyl ether (MTBE) (8:2, v/v) was selected as PLE extraction solvent. The optimized DLLME procedure, 3 mL of pure water and 1.0 mL tobacco extract solution, 40 μL of chloroform as extraction solvent, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile as disperser solvent, was validated. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors were in the range of 96‐159. The limits of detection were between 0.14 and 0.33 μg/kg. The repeatability of the proposed method, expressed as relative standard deviation, varied between 4.3 and 7.5% (n = 6). The recoveries of the analytes evaluated by fortification of tobacco samples were in the range of 84.7‐96.4%. Compared with the conventional sample preparation method for determination of volatile components in tobacco, the proposed method was quick and easy to operate, and had high‐enrichment factors and low consumption of organic solvent.     

液相微萃取／高效液相色谱法测定环境水样中的痕量苯脲类除草剂

建立了液相微萃取／高效液相色谱联用(LPME／HPLC)技术同时测定环境水中痕量异丙隆、秀谷隆和灭草隆除草剂的分析方法.考察了不同萃取条件及测定条件对检测结果的影响.优化后的萃取条件为:6μL正辛醇作萃取剂,液滴体积3μL,搅拌速度450 r/min,萃取30 min.结果表明,在优化条件下,3种除草剂的质量浓度在0....     

Coacervative extraction of Ochratoxin A in wines prior to liquid chromatography/fluorescence determination

Coacervates made up of reverse micelles of decanoic acid were assessed as a new strategy for the simplification of wine sample treatment in the determination of Ochratoxin A (OTA). Simultaneous extraction/concentration of this contaminant was based on both hydrophobic and hydrogen bond OTA:coacervate interactions. Parameters affecting extraction efficiency and concentration factors were studied. Concentrations of decanoic acid and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were the most influential parameters, being 0.5% of acid and 5% of THF the selected ones. The procedure was very robust, so that the extractions were not influenced by the pH and the nature or concentration of matrix components. OTA recoveries from different types of wines (white, rosé and red) ranged between 85 and 100% and the actual concentration factors varied from 105 to 125 for sample volumes of 15 mL. The detection limits for OTA, after liquid chromatography/fluorimetry (LC/FL) analysis of the coacervate (20 microL), were 4.5 ng L(-1) in white and rosé wines and 15 ng L(-1) in red wines, values which were far below the threshold limit established for OTA by EU directives (2.0 microg L(-1)). No clean-up of the extracts was required for any of the samples analysed. The overall sample treatment took about 15-20 min and several samples could be simultaneously treated using conventional lab equipment. The precision of the method, expressed as relative standard deviation, was about 5%. The approach developed was successfully applied to the determination of OTA in different wine samples from the South of Spain. The concentrations found ranged between 0.015 and 0.091 microg L(-1).     

分散液-液微萃取/高效液相色谱法测定水样中的痕量双酚A

建立了分散液-液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用技术测定水样中痕量双酚A(BPA)的方法. 通过对实验条件的筛选及优化, 得到最佳条件: 22.5 μL氯苯作萃取剂、0.5 mL丙酮作分散剂、0 min静止萃取时间、调节pH 3.2左右、10%离子强度及9 mL水样体积. 此条件下方法的线性范围为0.5~100 μg/L(R2=0.9941), 检出限为0.10 μg/L. 在BPA质量浓度为1 μg/L条件下, 方法回收率为87.8%~111.0%, 相对标准偏差8.3%(n=5), 富集倍数范围1905~2527. 对添加不同BPA浓度的自来水、地表水及回用中水进行分析, 回收率分别为(108±11.1)%, (107±13.2)%及(81.2±6.2)%(n=3). 在既定的色谱条件下, BPA的测定不受乙炔基雌二醇、雌二醇、雌三醇、雌酮和壬基酚等雌激素的干扰.     

Simultaneous determination of tetrahydropalmatine and tetrahydroberberine in rat urine using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-UV detection was applied in rat urine for the extraction and determination of tetrahydropalmatine (THP) and tetrahydroberberine (THB), both active components in Rhizoma corydalis. Various parameters affecting the extraction efficiency, such as the type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, pH, etc. were evaluated. Under the optimal conditions (extraction solvent: 37 μL of chloroform, dispersive solvent: 100 μL of methanol, alkaline with 100 μL of 1 mol/L NaOH, and without salt addition), the enrichment factors of THP and THB were more than 30. The extraction recoveries were 69.8-75.8% and 72.7-77.6% for THP and THB in rat urine, respectively. Both THP and THB showed good linearity in the range of 0.025-2.5 μg/mL, and the limit of quantification was 0.025 μg/mL (S/N=10, n=6). The intra-day and inter-day precision of THP and THB were <12.6%. The relative recoveries ranged from 95.5 to 107.4% and 96.8 to 100.9% for THP and THB in rat urine, respectively. The method has been successfully applied to rat urine samples. The results demonstrated that DLLME is a very simple, rapid and efficient method for the extraction and preconcentration of THP and THB from urine samples.     

A new strategy to simultaneous microextraction of acidic and basic compounds

The simultaneous extraction of acidic and basic pollutants from water samples is an interesting and debatable work in sample preparation techniques. A novel and efficient method named ion pair based surfactant assisted microextraction (IP-SAME) was applied for extraction and preconcentration of five selected acidic and basic aromatic species as model compounds in water samples, followed by high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection. A mixture including 1 mL of ultra-pure water (containing ionic surfactant as emulsifier agent) and 60 μL 1-octanol (as extraction solvent) was rapidly injected using a syringe into a 10.0 mL water sample which formed an emulsified solution. IP-SAME mechanism can be interpreted by two types of molecular mass transfer into the organic solvent (partitioning and ion pairing for non-ionized and ionized compounds, respectively) during emulsification process. The effective parameters on the extraction efficiency such as the extraction solvent type and its volume, type of the surfactant and its concentration, sample pH and ionic strength of the sample were optimized. Under the optimum conditions (60 μL of 1-octanol; 1.5 mmol L(-1) cethyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) as emulsifier agent and sample pH 10.0), the preconcentration factors (PFs), detection limits and linear dynamic ranges (LDRs) were obtained in the range of 87-348, 0.07-0.6 μg L(-1) and 0.1-200 μg L(-1) respectively. All of natural water samples were successfully analyzed by the proposed method.     

Analysis of abuse drugs in urine using surfactant-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction

The process of surfactant-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (SA-DLLME) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography-UV detection was successfully applied for the extraction and determination of selected cannabinoids (cannabidiol, Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, and cannabinol) in urine samples. The effective parameters on the extraction efficiency were studied and optimized utilizing two different optimization methods: one variable at a time (OVAT) and face center design (FCD). Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent and its volume, toluene, 85 μL; disperser agent and its concentration, 1.0 mL of ultra-pure water containing 0.5 mmol/L tetradecyl tremethyl ammonium bromide (TTAB); sample pH, 2.0 and salt concentration, 11% w/v NaCl), the limits of detection of the method were in the range of 0.1-0.5 μg/L and the repeatability and reproducibility of the proposed method, expressed as relative deviation, varied between 4.1 and 8.5% and 6.7 and 11.6%, respectively. Linearity was found to be in the range of 1.0-200 μg/L and under the optimum conditions, the preconcentration factors (PFs) were between 190 and 292. This proposed method was successfully applied in the analysis of three male advocate urine samples and good recoveries were obtained.     

Ultrapreconcentration and determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water by solid‐phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and high‐performance liquid chromatography

Solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was developed as an ultra‐preconcentration method for the determination of four organophosphorus pesticides (isocarbophos, parathion‐methyl, triazophos and fenitrothion) in water samples. The analytes considered in this study were rapidly extracted and concentrated from large volumes of aqueous solutions (100 mL) by solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and then analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography. Experimental variables including type and volume of elution solvent, volume and flow rate of sample solution, salt concentration, type and volume of extraction solvent and sample solution pH were investigated for the solid‐phase extraction coupled with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with these analytes, and the best results were obtained using methanol as eluent and ethylene chloride as extraction solvent. Under the optimal conditions, an exhaustive extraction for four analytes (recoveries >86.9%) and high enrichment factors were attained. The limits of detection were between 0.021 and 0.15 μg/L. The relative standard deviations for 0.5 μg/L of the pesticides in water were in the range of 1.9–6.8% (n = 5). The proposed strategy offered the advantages of simple operation, high enrichment factor and sensitivity and was successfully applied to the determination of four organophosphorus pesticides in water samples.