The Projective Beth Property and Interpolation in Positive and Related Logics

We look at the interplay between the projective Beth property in non-classical logics and interpolation. Previously, we proved that in positive logics as well as in superintuitionistic and modal ones, the projective Beth property PB2 follows from Craig's interpolation property and implies the restricted interpolation property IPR. Here, we show that IPR and PB2 are equivalent in positive logics, and also in extensions of the superintuitionistic logic KC and of the modal logic Grz.2. Supported by RFBR grant No. 06-01-00358, by INTAS grant No. 04-77-7080, and by the Council for Grants (under RF President) and State Aid of Fundamental Science Schools, project NSh-2069.2003.1. __________ Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 85–113, January–February, 2006.     

Restricted interpolation property in superintuitionistic logics

The restricted interpolation property IPR in modal and superintuitionistic logics is investigated. It is proved that in superintuitionistic logics of finite slices and in finite-slice extensions of the Grzegorczyk logic, the property IPR is equivalent to the projective Beth property PB2. Supported by RFBR (project No. 06-01-00358) and by the Council for Grants (under RF President) and State Aid of Leading Scientific Schools (grant NSh-335.2008.1). Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 54-89, January-February, 2009.     

Interpolation and Definability in Extensions of the Minimal Logic

We study into the interpolation property and the projective Beth property in extensions of Johansson's minimal logic. A family of logics of some special form is considered. Effective criteria are specified which allow us to verify whether an arbitrary logic in this family has a given property. Supported by RFBR grant No. 03-06-80178, by the Council for Grants (under RF President) and State Aid of Fundamental Science Schools, project NSh-2069.2003.1, and by INTAS grant No. 04-77-7080. __________ Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 726–750, November–December, 2005.     

Decidability of the interpolation problem and of related properties in tabular logics

Propositional modal and positive logics are considered as well as extensions of Johansson’s minimal logic. It is proved that basic versions of the interpolation property and of the Beth definability property, and also the Hallden property, are decidable on the class of tabular logics, i.e., logics given by finitely many finite algebras. Algorithms are described for constructing counterexamples to each of the properties mentioned in handling cases where the logic under consideration does not possess the required property.     

Superintuitionistic logics and the projective beth property

It is proved that in superintuitionistic logics, the projective Beth property follows from the Craig interpolation property, but the converse does not hold. A criterion is found which allows us to reduce the problem asking whether the projective Beth property is valid in superintuitionistic logics to suitable properties of varieties of pseudoboolean algebras. It is shown that the principle of variable separation follows from the projective Beth property. On the other hand, the interpolation property in a logic L implies the projective Beth property in Δ(L). Supported by RFFR grants No. 96-01-01552 and No. 99-01-00600. Translated fromAlgebra i Logika, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 680–696, November–December, 1999.     

Projective beth properties in modal and superintuitionistic logics

Projective Beth properties in superintuitionistic and normal modal logics are considered. Their interrelations and connections with interpolation properties of the logics are established. Algebraic counterparts for the projective Beth properties are found out. Supported by the Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation, grant No. 97-03-04089. Translated fromAlgebra i Logika, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 316–333, May–June, 1999.     

The Beth property and interpolation in lattice-based algebras and logics

We deal with logics based on lattices with an additional unary operation. Interrelations of different versions of interpolation, the Beth property, and amalgamation, as they bear on modal logics and varieties of modal algebras, superintuitionistic logics and varieties of Heyting algebras, positive logics and varieties of implicative lattices, have been studied in many works. Sometimes these relations can and sometimes cannot be extended to the logics without implication considered in the paper. Supported by INTAS (grant No. 04-77-7080) and by RFBR (grant No. 06-01-00358). Supported by INTAS grant No. 04-77-7080. __________ Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 307–334, May–June, 2008.     

On Finite Model Property for Admissible Rules

Our investigation is concerned with the finite model property (fmp) with respect to admissible rules. We establish general sufficient conditions for absence of fmp w. r. t. admissibility which are applicable to modal logics containing K4: Theorem 3.1 says that no logic λ containing K4 with the co-cover property and of width > 2 has fmp w. r. t. admissibility. Surprisingly many, if not to say all, important modal logics of width > 2 are within the scope of this theorem–K4 itself, S4, GL, K4.1, K4.2, S4.1, S4.2, GL.2, etc. Thus the situation is completely opposite to the case of the ordinary fmp–the absolute majority of important logics have fmp, but not with respect to admissibility. As regards logics of width ≤ 2, there exists a zone for fmp w. r. t. admissibility. It is shown (Theorem 4.3) that all modal logics A of width ≤ 2 extending S4 which are not sub-logics of three special tabular logics (which is equipotent to all these λ extend a certain subframe logic defined over S4 by omission of four special frames) have fmp w.r.t. admissibility.     

Algebraic Counterparts for Some Properties of Superintuitionistic Predicate Logics

Algebraic counterparts are found for the Beth, projective Beth, interpolation, disjunction, and existential properties of superintuitionistic first-order logics.     

The Lyndon property and uniform interpolation over the Grzegorczyk logic

We consider versions of the interpolation property stronger than the Craig interpolation property and prove the Lyndon interpolation property for the Grzegorczyk logic and some of its extensions. We also establish the Lyndon interpolation property for most extensions of the intuitionistic logic with Craig interpolation property. For all modal logics over the Grzegorczyk logic as well as for all superintuitionistic logics, the uniform interpolation property is equivalent to Craig’s property.     

Decidability of the Projective Beth Property in Varieties of Heyting Algebras

Previously, we proved that there are only finitely many varieties of Heyting algebras possessing the projective Beth property and gave an exhaustive list of these. The projective Beth property is equivalent to strong epimorphisms surjectivity (SES). Here, we prove that the projective Beth property and SES are base-decidable on a class of varieties of Heyting algebras.     

Predicate Modal Logics Do Not Mix Very Well

The problem of completeness for predicate modal logics is still under investigation, although some results have been obtained in the last few years (cf. [2, 3, 4, 7]). As far as we know, the case of multimodal logics has not been addressed at all. In this paper, we study the combination of modal logics in terms of combining their semantics. We demonstrate by a simple example that in this sense predicate modal logics are not so easily manipulated as propositional ones: mixing two Kripke-complete predicate modal logics (one with the Barcan formula, and the other without) results in a Kripke-incomplete system.     

Restricted Interpolation and the Projective Beth Property in Equational Logic

Interconnections between syntactic and categorical properties of equational theories are established. The notions of restricted interpolation and of restricted amalgamation are introduced and their equivalence proved; interrelations of the above-mentioned properties and the projective Beth property, interpolation, and amalgamation are studied.     

Axiomatizations of team logics

In a modular approach, we lift Hilbert-style proof systems for propositional, modal and first-order logic to generalized systems for their respective team-based extensions. We obtain sound and complete axiomatizations for the dependence-free fragment FO(～) of Väänänen's first-order team logic TL, for propositional team logic PTL, quantified propositional team logic QPTL, modal team logic MTL, and for the corresponding logics of dependence, independence, inclusion and exclusion.As a crucial step in the completeness proof, we show that the above logics admit, in a particular sense, a semantics-preserving elimination of modalities and quantifiers from formulas.     

An Inheritance Criterion for the Admissible Inference Rules of K4

We give a criterion for inheritance of the admissible inference rules of the modal logic K4 by the finitely approximable modal logics extending K4. We give a negative solution to the question of inheritance of the admissible rules of K4 by tabular logics. We exhibit a series of examples of modal logics which inherit or fail to inherit the admissible inference rules of K4.     

The relation between intuitionistic and classical modal logics

Intuitionistic propositional logicInt and its extensions, known as intermediate or superintuitionistic logics, in many respects can be regarded as just fragments of classical modal logics containingS4. The main aim of this paper is to construct a similar correspondence between intermediate logics augmented with modal operators—we call them intuitionistic modal logics—and classical polymodal logics We study the class of intuitionistic polymodal logics in which modal operators satisfy only the congruence rules and so may be treated as various sorts of □ and ◇. Supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. Translated fromAlgebra i Logika, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 121–155, March–April, 1997.     

Classically complete modal relevant logics

A variety of modal logics based on the relevant logic R are presented. Models are given for each of these logics and completeness is shown. It is also shown that each of these logics admits Ackermann's rule γ and as a corollary of this it is proved that each logic is a conservative extension of its counterpart based on classical logic, hence we call them “classically complete”. MSC: 03B45, 03B46.     

Residual Finiteness for Admissible Inference Rules

We look into methods which make it possible to determine whether or not the modal logics under examination are residually finite w.r.t. admissible inference rules. A general condition is specified which states that modal logics over K4 are not residually finite w.r.t. admissibility. It is shown that all modal logics over K4 of width strictly more than 2 which have the co-covering property fail to be residually finite w.r.t. admissible inference rules; in particular, such are K4, GL, K4.1, K4.2, S4.1, S4.2, and GL.2. It is proved that all logics over S4 of width at most 2, which are not sublogics of three special table logics, possess the property of being residually finite w.r.t. admissibility. A number of open questions are set up.