Certification of reference materials and accreditation of reference material producers: Questionable terminology leads to confusion

In the view of the Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) , a certifying body for reference materials can be considered to be a calibration laboratory. Therefore, accreditation of calibration laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025 is the most appropriate way to establish confidence in certificates for reference materials. If necessary, the criteria of ISO/IEC 17025 can be tailored to specific cases. There is no need to provide any new kind of reference-material specific accreditation. However, in view of the variety of reference materials and the practice existing in other countries, accreditation of testing laboratories and product certification bodies may optionally be acceptable as long as the same stringent principles with respect to traceability and measurement uncertainty are applied. Such accreditations but not accreditations of reference material producers (ISO Guide 34) are also covered by existing international mutual recognition arrangements (MRA).     

Implementation of ISO Guide 34: Accreditation for reference material production

The National Analytical Reference Laboratory of the Australian Government Analytical Laboratories was initially accredited to ILAC Guide G 12:2000 in January 2000 and is currently accredited to ISO Guide 34 (2000) for the production of a range of pure organic substance reference materials. This paper discusses the practical challenges and rewards of developing and implementing a quality system for reference material production and discusses some of the barriers, and potential solutions, to more general implementation of third-party accreditation.     

Accreditation of reference material producers

 The use of reference materials is the most pragmatic means by which the analyst can achieve comparability of data. Reference material producers therefore need to have adequate quality systems in place for ensuring the reliability of their materials. In order to provide guidance to both producers and assessors, ISO Guide 34 has recently been produced detailing the quality system requirements for the production of reference materials. CITAC, REMCO and ILAC are now collaborating in the revision of this guide to produce a free-standing document detailing the general requirements for the competence of reference material producers. This paper discusses some of the more important issues described in these documents. The possible formation of an international register containing details of a reference material producer's quality system status is also discussed.     

Accreditation system for reference material producers and certified reference materials for iron and steel in Japan

  ISO 9000 series strictly requires traceability to national or international measurement standards. It is becoming more necessary to make clear the concept of traceability of measurement standards with respect to chemical composition and to accredit the reference material producers. In Japan, the accreditation system for reference material producers is considered to satisfy the requirement of ISO Guide 34, ISO 9000 series and ISO/IEC Guide 25, while the producer fulfills the concept of traceability of measurement standards. This paper describes the production of iron and steel reference materials in Japan relating to the international standardization of methods (written standards) and accreditation of reference material producers. Received: 11 October 1996 Accepted: 5 December 1996     

Accreditation of reference material producers: an Australian perspective

The National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia has operated an accreditation program for reference material producers since 1997 with accreditation now being offered to ISO Guide 34 (2000). This paper discusses the benefits and disadvantages to both the producers and the users of reference materials (testing laboratories) and their clients of a formal system of third-party accreditation of reference material producers. The merits of using ISO Guide 34 (2000) rather than ISO/IEC 17025 as the core standard in the accreditation process are discussed.     

Accreditation of reference material producers: Let's get it right!

The accreditation of testing and calibration laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025 is increasingly calling for the accreditation of reference material (RM) producers. Two international guides, ISO Guide 34 (2000) " General requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the ISO Committee on Reference Materials and ILAC-G 12 " Guidelines for the requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), are already in use for this purpose. Recently however initiatives have been launched to accredit RM producers to ISO 17025 as calibration laboratories and it has been suggested that a combination of ISO/IEC 17025 " General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories" and ISO Guide 34 may be the best option. This publication is an expression of the position of the ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO/REMCO) on the standards and guides currently in use in the accreditation of RM producers. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these standards and guides from the perspective of benefit to RM producers and RM users. In conclusion, the use of ISO Guide 34 alone or in combination with ILAC-G 12 is the preferred system for the accreditation of RM producers. Therefore ISO/REMCO strongly encourages all accreditation bodies to adopt ISO Guide 34.     

Reference materials for measuring the size of nanoparticles

This article discusses the requirements for reference materials (RMs) for measuring the size of nanoparticles (NPs). Such RMs can be used for instrument calibration, statistical quality control or interlaboratory comparisons. They can come in the form of suspensions, powders or matrix-embedded materials [i.e. NPs integrated in a natural matrix (e.g., food, soil, or sludge)].At present, uncertainty about the most suitable form of material, the most relevant measurands and the most useful metrological-traceability statement inhibits the production of NP RMs. In addition, the lack of validated methods and qualified laboratories to produce NP RMs present formidable challenges.Metal, inorganic and organic NPs are available, but most of them are intended to be laboratory chemicals. With the exception of latex materials, certified RMs are not available, although some metrology institutes have started to develop such materials for colloidal gold and silica particles.     

The view of IRMM on accreditation of CRM producers

This article describes the views of IRMM on accreditation of CRM producers and the philosophy which is behind these views. More specifically, it explains the reasons for choosing ISO Guide 34 rather than ISO/IEC 17025 as the basis document for the proposed accreditation of its CRM activites. Received: 27 May 2002 Accepted: 11 July 2002 Acknowledgements Information on accreditation programmes in Australia and USA provided by Maree Stuart (NATA) and Randall V. Querry (AL2A) is greatly acknowledged. Correspondence to J. Pauwels     

The NATA scheme for accreditation of certifiers of reference materials

 Certified reference materials are widely used for the calibration of measuring equipment and for the evaluation or validation of measurement procedures. The use of reference materials makes possible the transfer of the values of measured or assigned quantities between testing, analytical and measurement laboratories, both nationally and internationally. There is an increasing number of reference materials producers in other countries, and a demonstration of their scientific and technical competence is now more widely considered to be a basic requirement for ensuring the quality of reference materials. This article outlines recent activities by international bodies and their culmination in a scheme of accreditation of certifiers of reference materials which has been developed by the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (NATA).     

Twenty-five years of international collaboration in reference materials via ISO/REMCO

This paper looks back on a quarter century of history of the Council Committee on Reference Materials of the International Organization for Standardization – REMCO. It begins however with the period before its formation in 1976 to describe how the Committee came into being as a response to a growing need by the analytical community for the number and variety of reference materials (RMs) as well as a need for the assurance of the quality of RMs and ends with a view of REMCO activities in the near future. This is not intended as a detailed history but instead to describe the evolution of REMCO by identifying major activities and accomplishments of REMCO. Received: 21 January 2002 Accepted: 22 January 2002     

化肥成分分析系列标准物质研制

研制了尿素、磷酸氢二铵、氯化钾、高氮磷低氯复合肥、高氮低氯复合肥、高钾硫基复合肥、高钾中氯复合肥、高磷低氯复合肥和平衡型硫基复合肥系列化肥标准物质,样品严格按照相关标准要求进行采集、加工制备、均匀性检验、稳定性检验,由15家不同行业的权威实验室进行协作定值,并对不确定度进行评定。结果表明,样品粒度分布满足样品加工要求,具有良好的均匀性和稳定性。本系列化肥标准物质共定值45项元素(指标),包括N、P₂O₅、水溶性P₂O₅、有效性P₂O₅、K₂O、S、Cl、As、Hg、Cr、Cd、Cu、Pb、Zn、Ni、B、Se、Ge、Fe、Na、Ca、Mg、Al、Ti、V、Mn、Co、Sr、Mo、Ba、Y、La、Ce、Pr、Nd、Sm、Eu、Gd、Tb、Dy、Ho、Er、Tm、Yb、Lu,量值准确可靠、不确定度范围评估合理,符合国家一级标准物质的要求。研制的9个化肥化学成分标准物质定值的元素含量梯度范围合理,填补了国内复合肥料标准物质空白,可为化肥样品...     

中国陆架沉积物标准物质研制

报道了我国研制的2个大陆架沉积物标准物质MS-E1,MS-S1。MS-E1和MS-S1的原样分别取自东海和南海。样品经风干、破碎,球磨制备成均匀的粉体样品。均匀性采用高精度的X射线荧光光谱法检验。样品的化学组分采用国内外多实验室协同分析方式定值,有7个国内实验室和9个国外实验室参加了合作分析。测试组分均为67个,分别有43和42个组分定为保证值,8和9个组分作为参考值。全组分百分总和分别为99.8%和99.6%。经2年多的试用,2个标准物质已于2005年被国家计量部门批准为国家一级标准物质,其编号分别为:GBW07335和GBW07336。     

Experiences from the assessment of proficiency testing providers

Following a pilot project in 2001–2002, UKAS accredited nine PT providers. During the course of the pilot and at subsequent surveillance visits, UKAS has gained experience in assessing organisations against the criteria detailed within ISO/IEC Guide 43-1:1997 and ILAC G13:2000. This article explores some of the key aspects that arose during the pilot and how UKAS has accommodated the addition of the accreditation of PT providers in to its range of services.Presented at the Eurachem PT Workshop September 2005, Portorož, Slovenia     

Stand alone accreditation of RM producers: arguments against it

Accreditation has a special responsibility in the European conformity assessment system. Before starting a new activity like stand alone accreditation of reference material producers, the consequences for the market place should be considered.     

Update on COMAR: the Internet database for certified reference materials

This paper describes the COMAR database for certified reference materials (CRMs). The Web-based version of COMAR is freely accessible via the Internet. COMAR was established to assist laboratories in finding the CRMs needed. The database is maintained in a collaboration of the world’s major CRM producers. The planned changes in the database as agreed at the last COMAR council meeting in Prague in May 2006 are indicated.

Accreditation of PT providers – is it worth the money?

This topic is being presented from two perspectives, namely the views of an accreditation body and those of an accredited provider of external quality assessment schemes. The first perspective, from an accreditation body, is based on the experience of Australia's national laboratory accreditation body (NATA), which has accredited fourteen proficiency testing (PT) providers and is currently processing an application from another. The second perspective is based on the experience of EQUALIS, the national quality assurance organisation for laboratory medicine in Sweden, which was granted accreditation in 2002.Presented at 5^th Eurachem Workshop on Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine, Portorož (Slovenia) 25–27 Sept 2005     

Reference material in residue control: assessment of matrix effects

The production of certified reference materials (CRM) requires a comprehensive consideration of which analytes and materials to select. The present study describes the pre-tests for the production of CRM for nitroimidazoles in plasma or muscle. By means of a commutability study, four factors, namely matrix (plasma – muscle), species (turkey – pig), matrix condition (fresh - lyophilized) and measurement technique (GC-NCI/MS-LC-MSMS) were checked for their usability. The results showed that the matrices, matrix conditions, as well as the species analyzed did not produce any relevantly different measurement results. Varying significantly and subject to a systematic error were those results which were determined by means of different measurement techniques. Presented at BERM-10, April 2006, Charleston, SC, USA     

Proficiency test exercise on the determination of natural levels of radionuclides in mushroom reference material

The results from a proficiency test exercise for the determination of natural levels of radionuclides in mushroom reference material carried out by laboratories in six different countries are discussed. These laboratories submitted data on seven radionuclides, namely ¹³⁴Cs, ¹³⁷Cs, ⁴⁰K, ⁹⁰Sr, ²⁴¹Am, ²²⁶Ra, and ²¹⁰Po. However, only the data received for three of these radionuclides could be statistically evaluated to obtain consensus mean values and confidence intervals (at a significance level of 0.05). The contents of ¹³⁴Cs, ¹³⁷Cs and ⁴⁰K were quantified as 4.4, 2,899 and 1,136 Bq/kg, respectively.