Quality assurance and quality control in forest soil analyses: a comparison between European soil laboratories

In transnational monitoring programmes, a balance between international reference methods, which improve spatial comparability, and national analysis methods that favour temporal comparability, by their use and testing over many years, needs to be sought. Prior to the next Pan-European Forest Soil Survey, a third interlaboratory comparison of soil analysis methods was organised. All participating laboratories were requested to use the same reference methods. Fifty-two soil laboratories from 27 European countries analysed a total of 48 soil parameters on three soil samples which were typical for European forest soils. The results of the statistical analysis showed a high interlaboratory and intralaboratory variability, especially for the acid oxalate extractions, particle size distribution, exchangeable elements and total carbonates. The intercomparability of the test results did not improve compared to the previous ring test. As the exercise aimed primarily at comparing the performance of the laboratories, it was not powerful enough to find cause–effect relationships between the meta information provided by the laboratories and the variability of the test results.

     

Quality assurance in research laboratories

During the last decade, it has become increasingly important that researchers demonstrate that research is conducted to the highest standards. The implementation of quality assurance for research laboratories will enable all fields of research and development to be judged impartially. There are no specific standards for research laboratories but where possible, existing standards can be adapted. This review is structured around two approaches. The first considers research to be a logical extension of testing, and it is assumed that testing standards can be applied methodically to each step in a research project. The second advocates a flexible approach, with research-specific criteria for assessing quality. The important papers published on this topic have been reviewed. The conclusions are that the general quality management approach, encompassed by the ISO 9000 series of standards with the emphasis on customer satisfaction and ‘fitness for purpose’, is suitable for implementing quality assurance in research laboratories.     

External quality assurance programmes in medical laboratories

 Medical laboratories have a long tradition of external quality assessment. Starting from pure quality control of laboratory performances, most schemes have evolved to a powerful tool for improving quality of clinical outcome of results. External quality assurance in medical laboratories not only includes laboratory performance evaluation, but also evaluation of method performance, post-marked vigilance, training and help. In the future, the quality of programmes must further be improved by accreditation of schemes and by using electronic data interchange. Received: 9 December 2000 Accepted: 14 December 2000     

Quality assurance systems in research and routine analytical laboratories

 In our article we explain the connections between the implementation of quality assurance (QA) in research and routine analytical laboratories. J. K. Taylor claims that QA in an analytical laboratory consists of two independent but closely related terms, quality control and quality assessment. If we construct the QA system according to his ideas, problems concerning quality can be solved with only one concept regardless of the type of analytical laboratory. Therefore there is no need to introduce new QA standards for research laboratories as suggested in some papers. In the routine laboratory quality control is more important, while in the research laboratory quality assessment is dominant.

     

Quality assurance systems in research and routine analytical laboratories

In our article we explain the connections between the implementation of quality assurance (QA) in research and routine analytical laboratories. J. K. Taylor claims that QA in an analytical laboratory consists of two independent but closely related terms, quality control and quality assessment. If we construct the QA system according to his ideas, problems concerning quality can be solved with only one concept regardless of the type of analytical laboratory. Therefore there is no need to introduce new QA standards for research laboratories as suggested in some papers. In the routine laboratory quality control is more important, while in the research laboratory quality assessment is dominant.     

Quality control and quality assurance aspects of the routine use of capillary electrophoresis for serum and urine proteins in clinical laboratories

Using capillary electrophoresis (CE) for serum protein electrophoresis, the quality of results begins with monitoring a well-functioning instrument, using scrupulously clean capillaries, well-calibrated methods as well as regular use of an internal quality control material. Quality assurance programs are available in countries such as Australia, United Kingdom, United States, and European countries such as Sweden and Germany. The present commercial control material that is available gives percentages of albumin, alpha 1, alpha 2, beta- and gamma-globulins, the gamma-component being of normal distribution, and not containing any monoclonal protein component. We feel that a quantitative commercial control material containing a monoclonal protein at decision level for treating myeloma patients would be beneficial to all laboratories as a serum protein electrophoresis control, whether the analysis is by CE or agarose gels. The same applies for control material for urinary protein electrophoresis.     

Quality assurance in clinical chemistry laboratories in the UK

 Since the mid-1960s quality assurance in clinical chemistry has progressed from a need to define and improve precision and accuracy in analytical test procedures to an all-embracing process of assuring that the whole process of pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases of handling patient samples is managed effectively and efficiently. Automated and computer-controlled equipment has reduced many of the analytical errors, in particular in imprecision, that were present in manual analysis. New management techniques have been developed to control the quality and appropriateness of results. Developments in internal quality control and external quality assessment procedures have enabled laboratories to continually improve the quality of assays. Laboratory accreditation and external quality assessment scheme accreditation have ensured that peer review and peer pressure have been applied to both laboratory and external quality assessment scheme performance. As the NHS reviews its priorities and places more emphasis on primary care provider demands, hospital laboratories will of necessity assist with near patient testing outside the laboratory. This will provide new challenges to the quality of the service provided. Received: 2 July 1998 · Accepted: 1 August 1998     

Key requirements for introducing quality assurance in measurement laboratories

 The implementation of a quality assurance system is fraught with difficulties. However, these difficulties may be overcome if the laboratory uses suitable means to facilitate the process. It is necessary to mobilise the intelligence and energy of all members of the laboratory. In order to command adherence, the project must be shared, and this necessitates a major effort by all concerned. Communication is a major factor in obtaining the support of all parties. Six important steps must be distinguished: – Defining quality policy – Creating awareness, information, training – Creating a quality structure – Establishing a deadline for obtaining accreditation – Progressive implementation – Experimentation and validation. Even if the task of obtaining and maintaining accreditation remains difficult, it clearly promotes a minimum level of organisation and stepwise progress in quality assurance. The laboratory must keep improving its quality system, using European Standard EN 45001 as an effective management model. Received: 9 April 1997 · Accepted: 11 September 1997     

Quality assurance in analytical laboratories engaged in research and development activities

 Research and development activities are carried out by various types of laboratories that are not the typical testing and calibration laboratories for which the ISO/IEC 17025 is the quality assurance implementation reference. In this paper, such laboratories engaged in R&D activities are classified and different approaches they can adopt with a view to implementing a quality system that are suited to their characteristics and the type of work they conduct are proposed. These approaches take account of existing standards for the certification/accreditation of laboratories and of guides on quality assurance for non-routine analytical laboratories. Received: 11 July 2002 Accepted: 29 November 2002 Presented at Analytica Conference, 23–26 April 2002, Munich, Germany Correspondence to M. Valcárcel     

Quality assurance and statistical control

In scientific research laboratories it is rarely possible to use quality assurance schemes, developed for large-scale analysis. Instead methods have been developed to control the quality of modest numbers of analytical results by relying on statistical control: Analysis of precision serves to detect analytical errors by comparing thea priori precision of the analytical results with the actual variability observed among replicates or duplicates. The method relies on the chi-square distribution to detect excess variability and is quite sensitive even for 5–10 results. Interference control serves to detect analytical bias by comparing results obtained by two different analytical methods, each relying on a different detection principle and therefore exhibiting different influence from matrix elements; only 5–10 sets of results are required to establish whether a regression line passes through the origo. Calibration control is an essential link in the traceability of results. Only one or two samples of pure solid or aqueous standards with accurately known content need to be analyzed. Verification is carried out by analyzing certified reference materials from BCR, NIST, or others; their limited accuracy of 5–10% make them less suitable for calibration purposes.     

Quality assurance in analytical chemical laboratories: Towards harmonization and integration of current standards

This article presents the results of a comparative study of the main quality assurance (QA) and good laboratory practice (GLP) regulation systems and standards for analytical chemical laboratories currently being applied in Europe. A growing number of laboratories are being confronted with the need to cope with two or more of these systems, which involves separate audits and inspections for certification and accreditation. As these regulatory systems have essentially the same aims, there is an increasing interest in harmonization of QA and GLP guidelines. As a first step in exploring the possibilities of harmonization, similarities and differences of the current systems, compiled in the form of cross reference tables, have been analyzed (from a laboratory practice point of view) by a study group of EURACHEM, The Netherlands. The conclusions of this study have recently been endorsed by the Committee of EURACHEM Europe.     

Establishing a quality assurance plan for nucleic acid-based diagnostic laboratories: from planning to implementation

Nucleic acid-based technologies have opened new perspectives in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment in clinical medicine. To maintain patient confidence in this rapidly expanding field and to provide the highest standard of analysis, strict laboratory quality assurance procedures must be followed. While impressive break-through are taking place in this field, the need for an appropriate and suitable quality assurance (QA) plan for nucleic acid-based diagnostic laboratories must be a top priority. In this study, we developed a systematic QA plan for this kind of diagnostic laboratories that would enable us to assure the highest quality standards of their services. We focus on those labs that would like to start introducing a quality system for the first time and discuss the most appropriate ways to pave the way to implement a QA plan from the beginning. This QA plan is suitable for any nucleic acid-based techniques laboratory regardless of the field or services provided.     

Management of quality control in analytical laboratories

The sources of errors in the results of chemical analysis are classified. Methods for the on-line control of the precision and accuracy of analysis are briefly discussed and compared in order to reveal the types of sources of errors in the considered methods. Algorithms to estimate the quality of work of an analytical laboratory based on the statistical analysis of the summarized results of control obtained in a certain period of time are proposed.     

Review of European Union requirements: quality standards for food analysis laboratories

 The European Union has prescribed strict quality standards for official food laboratories and the methods of analysis to be used in laboratories when carrying out official food control work. These requirements, which are based on accreditation, participation in proficiency testing schemes and using validated methods of analysis, are described in detail. The similar approach being taken within the Codex Alimentarius Commission is also outlined. The procedures prescribed will ensure that official food control laboratories have in place the measures to ensure that consistently reliable data can be produced. Received: 29 November 1995 Accepted: 8 January 1996     

Particle electrophoresis for quality assurance and process control

Process control is an increasingly important issue as life science companies world-wide strive for recognition of their manufacturing and product development quality measures according to International Standards Organization (ISO) or good manufacturing practices (GMP) standards. Analytical particle electrophoresis (APE) has the potential for significant contributions, not just to basic research, but also in process development and control in manufacturing environments. An important feature of colloidal (small) particles, which controls their behavior, is their surface charge. Optimization of life science products and process conditions involving small particles (>100 nm) may be approached by a variety of strategies based upon direct measurements of the charge properties of process particles or "reporter" particles. The availability of increasingly powerful instruments and control particle preparations (National Institute of Standards and Technology ((NIST) and others) for validation of instrument operation make the method more attractive than ever. We summarize highly flexible electrophoretic strategies for assessing process consistency both from the perspective of particles being processed as well as the processing environment and describe principles for the use of polymer microspheres both as control particles for validation of instrument operation as well as for probes of the assay medium.     

Spectrophotometric quantification of fluoxetine hydrochloride: Application to quality control and quality assurance processes

Simple and rapid spectrophotometric methods have been developed for the microdetermination of fluoxetine HCl. The proposed methods are based on the formation of ion-pair complexes between fluoxetine and bromophenol blue (BPB), bromothymol blue (BTB), bromocresol green (BCG), and bromocresol purple (BCP) which can be measured at optimum λ_max. Optimization of reaction conditions was investigated. Beerșs law was obeyed in the concentration ranges of 0.5–8.0 μg mL⁻¹, whereas optimum concentration as adopted from the Ringbom plots was 0.7–7.7 μg mL⁻¹. The molar absorptivity, Sandell sensitivity, and detection limit were also calculated. The most optimal and sensitive method was developed using BCG. The correlation coefficient was 0.9988 (n = 6) with a relative standard deviation of 1.25, for six determinations of 4.0 μg mL⁻¹. The proposed methods were successfully applied to the determination of fluoxetine hydrochloride in its dosage forms and in biological fluids (spiked plasma sample) using the standard addition technique.