Simon’s team’s contributions to scientific progress in mathematics education: A commentary on the Learning Through Activity (LTA) research program

I discuss two ways in which the Learning Through Activity (LTA) research program contributes to scientific progress in mathematics education: (a) providing general and content-specific constructs to explain conceptual learning and instructional design that corroborate and/or elaborate on previous work and (b) raising new questions/issues. The general constructs include using instructional design as testable models of learning and using theoretical constructs to guide real-time, instructional adaptations. In this sense, the general constructs promote understanding of linkages between conceptual learning and instruction in mathematics. The concept-specific constructs consist of empirically-grounded, hypothetical learning trajectories (HLTs) for fractional and multiplicative reasoning. Each HLT consists of specific, intended conceptual changes and tasks that can bring them forth. Questions raised for me by the LTA work involve inconsistencies between the stance on learning and reported teaching-learning interactions that effectively led to students’ abstraction of the intended mathematical concepts.     

Problems and solutions in students’ reinvention of a definition for sequence convergence

Little research exists on the ways in which students may develop an understanding of formal limit definitions. We conducted a study to (i) generate insights into how students might leverage their intuitive understandings of sequence convergence to construct a formal definition and (ii) assess the extent to which a previously established approximation scheme may support students in constructing their definition. Our research is rooted in the theory of Realistic Mathematics Education and employed the methodology of guided reinvention in a teaching experiment. In three 90-min sessions, two students, neither of whom had previously seen a formal definition of sequence convergence, constructed a rigorous definition using formal mathematical notation and quantification equivalent to the conventional definition. The students’ use of an approximation scheme and concrete examples were both central to their progress, and each portion of their definition emerged in response to overcoming specific cognitive challenges.     

Issues in theorizing mathematics learning and teaching: A contrast between learning through activity and DNR research programs

By continuing a contrast with the DNR research program, begun in Harel and Koichu (2010), I discuss several important issues with respect to teaching and learning mathematics that have emerged from our research program which studies learning that occurs through students’ mathematical activity and indicate issues of complementarity between DNR and our research program. I make distinctions about what we mean by inquiring into the mechanisms of conceptual learning and how it differs from work that elucidates steps in the development of a mathematical concept. I argue that the construct of disequilibrium is neither necessary nor sufficient to explain mathematics conceptual learning. I describe an emerging approach to instruction aimed at particular mathematical understandings that fosters reinvention of mathematical concepts without depending on students’ success solving novel problems.     

Investigating functional thinking in the elementary classroom: Foundations of early algebraic reasoning

This paper examines the development of student functional thinking during a teaching experiment that was conducted in two classrooms with a total of 45 children whose average age was nine years and six months. The teaching comprised four lessons taught by a researcher, with a second researcher and classroom teacher acting as participant observers. These lessons were designed to enable students to build mental representations in order to explore the use of function tables by focusing on the relationship between input and output numbers with the intention of extracting the algebraic nature of the arithmetic involved. All lessons were videotaped. The results indicate that elementary students are not only capable of developing functional thinking but also of communicating their thinking both verbally and symbolically.     

Understanding rigid geometric transformations: Jeff's learning path for translation

This article describes the development of knowledge and understanding of translations of Jeff, a prospective elementary teacher, during a teaching experiment that also included other rigid transformations. His initial conceptions of translations and other rigid transformations were characterized as undefined motions of a single object. He conceived of transformations as movement and showed no indication about what defines a transformation. The results of the study indicate that the development of his thinking about translations and other rigid transformations followed an order of (1) transformations as undefined motions of a single object, (2) transformations as defined motions of a single object, and (3) transformations as defined motions of all points on the plane. The case of Jeff is part of a bigger study that included four prospective teachers and analyzed their development in understanding of rigid transformations. The other participants also showed a similar evolution.     

Learning fraction comparison by using a dynamic mathematics software – GeoGebra

GeoGebra is a mathematics software system that can serve as a tool for inquiry-based learning. This paper deals with the application of a fraction comparison software, which is constructed by GeoGebra, for use in a dynamic mathematics environment. The corresponding teaching and learning issues have also been discussed.