Preparation of Cyclodextrin–Iron Species in Water by Laser Ablation: Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

Supramolecular complexes between cyclodextrin and iron species are studied by using secondary ion mass spectrometry. The iron species are prepared by pulsed‐laser ablation of bulk iron in water; this gives Fe⁺ (56 m/z) and Fe_xO_y⁺ (x, y=1–7) species. Cyclodextrin is added to the water either before or after the laser ablation. When it is added before laser ablation, molecular fragments of cyclodextrin are detected as dehydrated glucopyranose units (C₆H₈O₄⁺) associated with Fe⁺, FeO⁺, and Fe₂O⁺ species. The focus is to observe supramolecular host–guest complexes or adducts between intact molecules of cyclodextrin and iron species. When cyclodextrin is added after laser ablation, the relevant peak at 1210 m/z is observed and assigned as C₄₂H₆₇O₃₅FeNa⁺, which corresponds to a cyclodextrin molecule minus three H atoms. Two possible explanations of this finding are the presence of the host–guest C₄₂H₆₇O₃₅Na–Fe complex, in which Fe is in the cavity, or the presence of the adduct C₄₂H₆₇O₃₄Na–FeO with FeO on the outer surface; the formation of these complexes are supported by the hydrophobicity of Fe and hydrophilicity of FeO, respectively. Due to the presence of 12 % of intact C₄₂H₇₀O₃₅Na–Fe complex and an estimated Fe/FeO ratio of approximately 10², host–guest formation is assumed to be more significant.     

Double‐Oxygen‐Atom Transfer in Reactions of CemO2m+ (m=2–6) with C2H2

Cerium oxide cluster cations (Ce_mO_n⁺, m=2–16; n=2m, 2m±1 and 2m±2) are prepared by laser ablation and reacted with acetylene (C₂H₂) in a fast‐flow reactor. A time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer is used to detect the cluster distribution before and after the reactions. Reactions of stoichiometric Ce_mO_2m⁺ (m=2–6) with C₂H₂ produce Ce_mO_2m?2⁺ clusters, which indicates a “double‐oxygen‐atom transfer” reaction Ce_mO_2m⁺+C₂H₂→Ce_mO_2m?2⁺+(CHO)₂ (ethanedial). A single‐oxygen‐atom transfer reaction channel is also identified as Ce_mO_2m⁺+C₂H₂→Ce_mO_2m?1⁺+C₂H₂O (at least for m=2 and 3). Density functional theory calculations are performed to study reaction mechanisms of Ce₂O₄⁺+C₂H₂, and the calculated results confirm that both the single‐ and double‐oxygen‐atom transfer channels are thermodynamically and kinetically favourable.     

Extreme Differences in the Interactions of `Bare' Fe+ and Fe2+ with Hydrogen Peroxide: Fenton Chemistry in the Gas Phase

The interaction of bare iron mono‐ and dications with hydrogen peroxide in the gas phase is studied by ab initio calculations employing the B3LYP/6‐311+G* level of theory. For the monocation, the quartet and sextet coordination complexes Fe(H₂O₂) are high‐energy isomers that easily interconvert to the more stable iron dihydroxide monocation Fe(OH) and hydrated iron oxide (H₂O)FeO⁺ (quartet) or dissociate into FeOH⁺+OH^. (sextet). On the dication surface, however, the order of stabilities is reversed in that Fe(H₂O₂)²⁺ (quintet) corresponds to the most stable doubly charged species, while the formal Fe^IV compounds Fe(OH) and (H₂O)FeO²⁺ are higher in energy.     

Pentazol‐Derivate und daraus entstehende Azide: [O3S—p‐C6H4—N5]— und [O3S—p‐C6H4—N3]— als Kalium‐Kronenether‐Salze

Pentazole Derivates and Azides Formed from them: Potassium‐Crown‐Ether Salts of [O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₅]^— and [O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₃]^{— —}O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₂⁺ was reacted with sodium azide at —50 °C in methanol, yielding a mixture of 4‐pentazolylbenzenesulfonate and 4‐azidobenzenesulfonate (amount‐of‐substance ratio 27:73 according to NMR). By addition of KOH in methanol at —50 °C a mixture of the potassium salts K[O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₅] and K[O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₃] was precipitated (ratio 60:40). A solution of this mixture along with 18‐crown‐6 in tetrahydrofurane yielded the crystalline pentazole derivate [THF‐K‐18‐crown‐6][O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₅]·THF by addition of petrol ether at —70 °C. From the same solution upon evaporation and redissolution in THF/petrol ether the crystalline azide [THF‐K‐18‐crown‐6][O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₃]·THF was obtained. A solution of the latter in chloroform/toluene under air yielded [K‐18‐crown‐6][O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₃]·1/3H₂O. According to their X‐ray crystal structure determinations [THF‐K‐18‐crown‐6][O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₅]·THF and [THF‐K‐18‐crown‐6][O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₃]·THF have the same kind of crystal packing. Differences worth mentioning exist only for the atomic positions of the pentazole ring as compared to the azido group and for one THF molecule which is coordinated to the potassium ion; different orientations of the THF molecule take account for the different space requirements of the N₅ and the N₃ group. In [K‐18‐crown‐6][O₃S—p‐C₆H₄—N₃]·1/3H₂O there exists one unit consisting of one [K‐18‐crown‐6]⁺ and one [O₃S‐C₆H₄—N₃]^— ion and another unit consisting of two [O₃S‐C₆H₄—N₃]^— ions joined via two [K‐18‐crown‐6]⁺ ions and one water molecule. The rate constants for the decomposition [O₃S‐C₆H₄—N₅]^— → [O₃S‐C₆H₄—N₃]^— + N₂ in methanol were determined at 0 °C and —20 °C.     

Tetraphenylphosphonium bis(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolato)aurate(III) acetone solvate and ethyltriphenylphosphonium bis(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolato)aurate(III)

In the two title complexes, (C₂₄H₂₀P)[Au(C₃S₅)₂]·C₃H₆O, (I), and (C₂₀H₂₀P)[Au(C₃S₅)₂], (II), the Au^III atoms exhibit square‐planar coordinations involving four S atoms from two 2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolate (dmit) ligands. The Au—S bond lengths, ranging from 2.3057 (8) to 2.3233 (7) Å in (I) and from 2.3119 (8) to 2.3291 (10) Å in (II), are slightly smaller than the sum of the single‐bond covalent radii. In (I), there are two halves of independent Ph₄P⁺ cations, in which the two P atoms lie on twofold rotation axis sites. The Ph₄P⁺ cations and [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ anions are interspersed as columns in the packing. Layers composed of Ph₄P⁺ and [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ are separated by layers of acetone molecules. In (II), the [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ anions and EtPh₃P⁺ counter‐cations form a layered arrangement, and the [Au(C₃S₅)₂]⁻ anions form discrete pairs with a long intermolecular Au...S interaction for each Au atom in the crystal structure.     

Methoxy‐ether and crown‐ether ­derivatives of tetrahomodioxa‐ and octahomotetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes

Three methoxy­‐ether and one methoxy‐­ether/crown‐ether derivatives of p‐tert‐butyl­tetrahomodioxa‐ and p‐R‐octahomo­tetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes (R = methyl, tert‐butyl, H) have been investigated. The first three compounds, 7,15,21,27‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐29,30,31,32‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11‐dioxapenta­cyclo­[23.3.­1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^19,23]­ditriaconta‐1(29),5,7,­9(30),­13,15,‐17(31),­19,21,23(32),25,27‐dodecaene, C₅₀H₆₈O₆, 33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27‐tetra­oxa­penta­cyclo[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexa­tri­aconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₀H₄₈O₈, and 7,23‐di‐tert‐butyl‐33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11,19,27‐tetraoxapenta­cyclo­[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexatriaconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),‐ 21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₄H₅₆O₈, in the partial‐cone or 1,2‐alternate conformations, present the common feature of methoxy‐­ether self‐inclusion, while the fourth, 42,43‐di­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27,34,37,40‐heptaoxahexa­cyclo[15.15.9.1^5,9.1^21,25.0^13,41.0^29,33]­tritetra­conta‐5(42),6,8,13(41),­14,16,21(43),22,24,29(33),30,32‐dodecaene, C₄₂H₅₀O₉, adopts the 1,3‐alternate conformation owing to the presence of a 1,3‐polyether chain.     

A solid‐state oxidation of 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfinate to 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfonate

The organic acid–base complex 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfonate, C₅H₁₄N₃⁺·C₇H₇O₃S⁻, was obtained from the corresponding 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfinate complex, C₅H₁₄N₃⁺·C₇H₇O₂S⁻, by solid‐state oxidation in air. Comparison of the two crystal structures reveals similar packing arrangements in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c, with centrosymmetric 2:2 tetramers being connected by four strong N—H...O=S hydrogen bonds between the imine N atoms of two 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium bases and the O atoms of two acid molecules.     

Photofragmentation of 2‐Deoxy‐D‐Ribose Molecules in the Gas Phase

We have measured the synchrotron‐induced photofragmentation of isolated 2‐deoxy‐D ‐ribose molecules (C₅H₁₀O₄) at four photon energies, namely, 23.0, 15.7, 14.6, and 13.8 eV. At all photon energies above the molecule′s ionization threshold we observe the formation of a large variety of molecular cation fragments, including CH₃⁺, OH⁺, H₃O⁺, C₂H₃⁺, C₂H₄⁺, CH_xO⁺ (x=1,2,3), C₂H_xO⁺ (x=1–5), C₃H_xO⁺ (x=3–5), C₂H₄O₂⁺, C₃H_xO₂⁺ (x=1,2,4–6), C₄H₅O₂⁺, C₄H_xO₃⁺ (x=6,7), C₅H₇O₃⁺, and C₅H₈O₃⁺. The formation of these fragments shows a strong propensity of the DNA sugar to dissociate upon absorption of vacuum ultraviolet photons. The yields of particular fragments at various excitation photon energies in the range between 10 and 28 eV are also measured and their appearance thresholds determined. At all photon energies, the most intense relative yield is recorded for the m/q=57 fragment (C₃H₅O⁺), whereas a general intensity decrease is observed for all other fragments— relative to the m/q=57 fragment—with decreasing excitation energy. Thus, bond cleavage depends on the photon energy deposited in the molecule. All fragments up to m/q=75 are observed at all photon energies above their respective threshold values. Most notably, several fragmentation products, for example, CH₃⁺, H₃O⁺, C₂H₄⁺, CH₃O⁺, and C₂H₅O⁺, involve significant bond rearrangements and nuclear motion during the dissociation time. Multibond fragmentation of the sugar moiety in the sugar–phosphate backbone of DNA results in complex strand lesions and, most likely, in subsequent reactions of the neutral or charged fragments with the surrounding DNA molecules.     

Formation of the Distinct Redox‐Interrelated Forms of Nitric Oxide from Reaction of Dinitrosyl Iron Complexes (DNICs) and Substitution Ligands

Release of the distinct NO redox‐interrelated forms (NO⁺, ^.NO, and HNO/NO^?), derived from reaction of the dinitrosyl iron complex (DNIC) [(NO)₂Fe(C₁₂H₈N)₂]^? ( 1 ) (C₁₂H₈N=carbazolate) and the substitution ligands (S₂CNMe₂)₂, [SC₆H₄‐o‐NHC(O)(C₅H₄N)]₂ ((PyPepS)₂), and P(C₆H₃‐3‐SiMe₃‐2‐SH)₃ ([P(SH)₃]), respectively, was demonstrated. In contrast to the reaction of (PyPepS)₂ and DNIC 1 in a 1:1 stoichiometry that induces the release of an NO radical and the formation of complex [PPN][Fe(PyPepS)₂] ( 4 ), the incoming substitution ligand (S₂CNMe₂)₂ triggered the transformation of DNIC 1 into complex [(NO)Fe(S₂CNMe₂)₂] ( 2 ) along with N‐nitrosocarbazole ( 3 ). The subsequent nitrosation of N‐acetylpenicillamine (NAP) by N‐nitrosocarbazole ( 3 ) to produce S‐nitroso‐N‐acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) may signify the possible formation pathway of S‐nitrosothiols from DNICs by means of transnitrosation of N‐nitrosamines. Protonation of DNIC 1 by [P(SH)₃] triggers the release of HNO and the generation of complex [PPN][Fe(NO)P(C₆H₃‐3‐SiMe₃‐2‐S)₃] ( 5 ). In a similar fashion, the nucleophilic attack of the chelating ligand P(C₆H₃‐3‐SiMe₃‐2‐SNa)₃ ([P(SNa)₃]) on DNIC 1 resulted in the direct release of [NO]^? captured by [(¹⁵NO)Fe(SPh)₃]^?, thus leading to [(¹⁵NO)(¹⁴NO)Fe(SPh)₂]^?. These results illustrate one aspect of how the incoming substitution ligands ((S₂CNMe₂)₂ vs. (PyPepS)₂ vs. [P(SH)₃]/[P(SNa)₃]) in cooperation with the carbazolate‐coordinated ligands of DNIC 1 function to control the release of NO⁺, ^.NO, or [NO]^? from DNIC 1 upon reaction of complex 1 and the substitution ligands. Also, these results signify that DNICs may act as an intermediary of NO in the redox signaling processes by providing the distinct redox‐interrelated forms of NO to interact with different NO‐responsive targets in biological systems.     

rac‐3‐Benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionic acid and its organic salts: possibilities of Yang photocyclization in crystals

The analysis of the crystal structures of rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionic acid, C₁₁H₁₂O₃, (I), morpholinium rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionate monohydrate, C₄H₁₀NO⁺·C₁₁H₁₁O₃⁻·H₂O, (II), pyridinium [hydrogen bis(rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionate)], C₅H₆N⁺·(H⁺·2C₁₁H₁₁O₃⁻), (III), and pyrrolidinium rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionate rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionic acid, C₄H₁₀N⁺·C₁₁H₁₁O₃⁻·C₁₁H₁₂O₃, (IV), has enabled us to predict and understand the behaviour of these compounds in Yang photocyclization. Molecules containing the Ar—CO—C—C—CH fragment can undergo Yang photocyclization in solvents but they can be photoinert in the crystalline state. In the case of the compounds studied here, the long distances between the O atom of the carbonyl group and the γ‐H atom, and between the C atom of the carbonyl group and the γ‐C atom preclude Yang photocyclization in the crystals. Molecules of (I) are deprotonated in a different manner depending on the kind of organic base used. In the crystal structure of (III), strong centrosymmetric O...H...O hydrogen bonds are observed.     

Three‐dimensional networks in 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate

The two title proton‐transfer compounds, 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻, (I), and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, 2C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S²⁻, (II), are each organized into a three‐dimensional network by a combination of X—H...O (X = O, N or C) hydrogen bonds, and π–π and C—H...π interactions.     

Six two‐ and three‐component ammonium carboxylate salt structures with a ladder‐type hydrogen‐bonding motif,three incorporating neutral carboxylic acid molecules

Six ammonium carboxylate salts are synthesized and reported, namely 2‐propylammonium benzoate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻, (I), benzylammonium (R)‐2‐phenylpropionate, C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₉H₉O₂⁻, (II), (RS)‐1‐phenylethylammonium naphthalene‐1‐carboxylate, C₈H₁₂N⁺·C₁₁H₇O₂⁻, (III), benzylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (IV), cyclopropylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₃H₈N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (V), and cyclopropylammonium–ea‐cis‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylate–ee‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid (2/1/1), 2C₃H₈N⁺·C₈H₁₀O₄²⁻·C₈H₁₂O₄, (VI). Salts (I)–(III) all have a 1:1 ratio of cation to anion and feature three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds which form one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded ladders. Salts (I) and (II) have type II ladders, consisting of repeating R₄³(10) rings, while (III) has type III ladders, in this case consisting of alternating R₄²(8) and R₄⁴(12) rings. Salts (IV) and (V) have a 1:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to benzoic acid. They have type III ladders formed by three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds, while the benzoic acid molecules are pendant to the ladders and hydrogen bond to them via O—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds. Salt (VI) has a 2:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to acid and does not feature any hydrogen‐bonded ladders; instead, the ionized and un‐ionized components form a three‐dimensional network of hydrogen‐bonded rings. The two‐component 1:1 salts are formed from a 1:1 ratio of amine to acid. To create the three‐component salts (IV)–(VI), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced so as to deprotonate only half of the acid molecules, and then to observe how the un‐ionized acid molecules are incorporated into the ladder motif. For (IV) and (V), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced to 1:2, while for (VI) the ratio of amine to acid required to deprotonate only half the diacid molecules was 1:1.     

Strychninium N‐phthaloyl‐β‐alaninate N‐phthaloyl‐β‐alanine and brucinium N‐phthaloyl‐β‐alaninate 5.67‐hydrate

Comparison of the structures of strychninium N‐phthaloyl‐β‐alaninate N‐phthaloyl‐β‐alanine, C₂₁H₂₃N₂O₂⁺·C₁₁H₈NO₄⁻·C₁₁H₉NO₄, and brucinium N‐phthaloyl‐β‐alaninate 5.67‐hydrate, C₂₃H₂₇N₂O₄⁺·C₁₁H₈NO₄⁻·5.67H₂O, reveals that, unlike strychninium cations, brucinium cations display a tendency to produce stacking inter­actions with cocrystallizing guests.     

Three‐dimensional networks in bis(imidazolium) 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoate and 4‐methylimidazolium 2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate

Cocrystallization of imidazole or 4‐methylimidazole with 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid from methanol solution yields the title 2:1 and 1:1 organic salts, 2C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂²⁻, (I), and C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂⁻, (II), respectively. Compound (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group with the mid‐point of the S—S bond lying on a twofold axis. The component ions in (I) are linked by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds to form a two‐dimensional network, which is further linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network. In contrast, by means of N—H...O, N—H...S and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, the component ions in (II) are linked into a tape and adjacent tapes are further linked by π–π, C—H...O and C—H...π interactions, resulting in a three‐dimensional network.     

Structural study of six cycloalkylammonium cinnamate salt structures featuring one‐dimensional columns and two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded networks

Six ammonium carboxylate salts, namely cyclopentylammonium cinnamate, C₅H₁₂N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (I), cyclohexylammonium cinnamate, C₆H₁₄N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (II), cycloheptylammonium cinnamate form I, C₇H₁₆N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (IIIa), and form II, (IIIb), cyclooctylammonium cinnamate, C₈H₁₈N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (IV), and cyclododecylammonium cinnamate, C₁₂H₂₆N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (V), are reported. Salts (II)–(V) all have a 1:1 ratio of cation to anion and feature three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds forming one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded columns consisting of repeating R₄³(10) rings, while salt (I) has a two‐dimensional network made up of alternating R₄⁴(12) and R⁶₈(20) rings. Salt (III) consists of two polymorphic forms, viz. form I having Z′ = 1 and form II with Z′ = 2. The latter polymorph has disorder of the cycloheptane rings in the two cations, as well as whole‐molecule disorder of one of the cinnamate anions. A similar, but ordered, Z′ = 2 structure is seen in salt (IV).     

2(S)‐Amino‐3‐[1H‐imidazol‐4(5)‐yl]­propyl cyclo­hexylmethyl ether di­hydro­chloride and 2(S)‐amino‐3‐[1H‐imidazol‐4(5)‐yl]­propyl 4‐bromo­benzyl ether di­hydro­chloride

(Cyclo­hexyl­methyl­oxy­methyl)(1H‐imidazol‐4‐io­methyl)‐(S)‐ammonium dichloride, C₁₃H₂₅N₃O⁺·2Cl^?, and (4‐bromo­benzyl)(1H‐imidazol‐4‐io­methyl)‐(S)‐ammonium dichloride, C₁₃H₁₈BrN₃O⁺·2Cl^?, are model compounds with different biological activities for evaluation of the hist­amine H3‐receptor activation mechanism. Both title compounds occur in almost similar extended conformations.     

Hydrogen bonding and π–π stacking in methyl­aminium 4′,7‐dihydroxy­isoflavone‐3′‐sulfonate dihydrate and hexa­aqua­iron(II) bis­(4′,7‐diethoxy­isoflavone‐3′‐sulfonate) tetra­hydrate

In methyl­aminium 4′,7‐dihydroxy­isoflavone‐3′‐sulfonate dihydrate, CH₆N⁺·C₁₅H₉O₇S⁻·2H₂O, 11 hydrogen bonds exist between the methyl­aminium cations, the iso­flavone‐3′‐sulfonate anions and the solvent water mol­ecules. In hexa­aqua­iron(II) bis­(4′,7‐diethoxy­isoflavone‐3′‐sulfonate) tetra­hydrate, [Fe(H₂O)₆](C₁₉H₁₇O₇S)₂·4H₂O, 12 hydrogen bonds exist between the centrosymmetric [Fe(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cation, the isoflavone‐3′‐sulfonate anions and the solvent water mol­ecules. Additional π–π stacking inter­actions generate three‐dimensional supramolecular structures in both compounds.     

New hydrophobic L‐amino acid salts: maleates of L‐leucine,L‐isoleucine and L‐norvaline

Crystals of maleates of three amino acids with hydrophobic side chains [L‐leucenium hydrogen maleate, C₆H₁₄NO₂⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻, (I), L‐isoleucenium hydrogen maleate hemihydrate, C₆H₁₄NO₂⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻·0.5H₂O, (II), and L‐norvalinium hydrogen maleate–L‐norvaline (1/1), C₅H₁₁NO₂⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻·C₅H₁₂NO₂, (III)], were obtained. The new structures contain C₂²(12) chains, or variants thereof, that are a common feature in the crystal structures of amino acid maleates. The L‐leucenium salt is remarkable due to a large number of symmetrically non‐equivalent units (Z′ = 3). The L‐isoleucenium salt is a hydrate despite the fact that L‐isoleucine is a nonpolar hydrophobic amino acid (previously known amino acid maleates formed hydrates only with lysine and histidine, which are polar and hydrophilic). The L‐norvalinium salt provides the first example where the dimeric cation L‐Nva...L‐NvaH⁺ was observed. All three compounds have layered noncentrosymmetric structures. Preliminary tests have shown the presence of the second harmonic generation (SGH) effect for all three compounds.     

6‐Propyl‐2‐thiouracil versus 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil: enhancing the hydrogen‐bonded synthon motif by replacement of a methylene group with an O atom

The understanding of intermolecular interactions is a key objective of crystal engineering in order to exploit the derived knowledge for the rational design of new molecular solids with tailored physical and chemical properties. The tools and theories of crystal engineering are indispensable for the rational design of (pharmaceutical) cocrystals. The results of cocrystallization experiments of the antithyroid drug 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil (PTU) with 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine (DAPY), and of 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil (MOMTU) with DAPY and 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidine (TAPY), respectively, are reported. PTU and MOMTU show a high structural similarity and differ only in the replacement of a methylene group (–CH₂–) with an O atom in the side chain, thus introducing an additional hydrogen‐bond acceptor in MOMTU. Both molecules contain an ADA hydrogen‐bonding site (A = acceptor and D = donor), while the coformers DAPY and TAPY both show complementary DAD sites and therefore should be capable of forming a mixed ADA/DAD synthon with each other, i.e. N—H…O, N—H…N and N—H…S hydrogen bonds. The experiments yielded one solvated cocrystal salt of PTU with DAPY, four different solvates of MOMTU, one ionic cocrystal of MOMTU with DAPY and one cocrystal salt of MOMTU with TAPY, namely 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracilate–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–N,N‐dimethylacetamide–water (1/1/1/1) (the systematic name for 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracilate is 6‐oxo‐4‐propyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₇H₉N₂OS⁻·C₄H₆N₄·C₄H₉NO·H₂O, (I), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₃H₇NO, (II), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₄H₉NO, (III), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–dimethyl sulfoxide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₂H₆OS, (IV), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₅H₉NO, (V), 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate (the systematic name for 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate is 4‐methoxymethyl‐6‐oxo‐2‐sulfanylidene‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₆H₇N₂O₂S⁻, (VI), and 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidinium 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate–6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil (1/1), C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₆H₇N₂O₂S⁻·C₆H₈N₂O₂S, (VII). Whereas in (I) only an AA/DD hydrogen‐bonding interaction was formed, the structures of (VI) and (VII) both display the desired ADA/DAD synthon. Conformational studies on the side chains of PTU and MOMTU also revealed a significant deviation for cocrystals (VI) and (VII), leading to the desired enhancement of the hydrogen‐bond pattern within the crystal.     

The first crystal structure of an alkaline metal salt of thioglucose: potassium 1‐thio‐β‐D‐glucoside monohydrate

In the crystal structure of the title hydrated salt, poly[(μ₂‐aqua)(μ₄‐1‐sulfido‐β‐D‐glucoside)potassium], [K(C₆H₁₁O₅S)(H₂O)]_n or K⁺·C₆H₁₁O₅S⁻·H₂O, each thioglucoside anion coordinates to four K⁺ cations through three of its four hydroxy groups, forming a three‐dimensional polymeric structure. The negatively charged thiolate group in each anion does not form an efficient coordination bond with a K⁺ cation, but forms intermolecular hydrogen bonds with four hydroxy groups, which appears to sustain the polymeric structure. The Cremer–Pople parameters for the thioglucoside ligand (Q = 0.575, θ = 8.233° and ϕ = 353.773°) indicate a slight distortion of the pyranose ring.