共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Let G=(V,E)be a graph andφbe a total coloring of G by using the color set{1,2,...,k}.Let f(v)denote the sum of the color of the vertex v and the colors of all incident edges of v.We say thatφis neighbor sum distinguishing if for each edge uv∈E(G),f(u)=f(v).The smallest number k is called the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number,denoted byχ′′nsd(G).Pil′sniak and Wo′zniak conjectured that for any graph G with at least two vertices,χ′′nsd(G)(G)+3.In this paper,by using the famous Combinatorial Nullstellensatz,we show thatχ′′nsd(G)2(G)+col(G)-1,where col(G)is the coloring number of G.Moreover,we prove this assertion in its list version. 相似文献
2.
A proper -edge-coloring of a graph with colors in is neighbor sum distinguishing (or, NSD for short) if for any two adjacent vertices, the sums of the colors of the edges incident with each of them are distinct. Flandrin et al. conjectured that every connected graph with at least vertices has an NSD edge coloring with at most colors. Huo et al. proved that every subcubic graph without isolated edges has an NSD -edge-coloring. In this paper, we first prove a structural result about subcubic graphs by applying the decomposition theorem of Trotignon and Vu?kovi?, and then applying this structural result and the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, we extend the NSD -edge-coloring result to its list version and show that every subcubic graph without isolated edges has a list NSD -edge-coloring. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
A proper k-edge coloring of a graph G is an assignment of one of k colors to each edge of G such that there are no two edges with the same color incident to a common vertex.Let f(v)denote the sum of colors of the edges incident to v.A k-neighbor sum distinguishing edge coloring of G is a proper k-edge coloring of G such that for each edge uv∈E(G),f(u)≠f(v).Byχ’_∑(G),we denote the smallest value k in such a coloring of G.Let mad(G)denote the maximum average degree of a graph G.In this paper,we prove that every normal graph with mad(G)<10/3 andΔ(G)≥8 admits a(Δ(G)+2)-neighbor sum distinguishing edge coloring.Our approach is based on the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz and discharging method. 相似文献
9.
A graph is IC-planar if it admits a drawing in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once and two crossed edges share no common end-vertex.A proper total-k-coloring of G is called neighbor sum distinguishing if∑_c(u)≠∑_c(v)for each edge uv∈E(G),where∑_c(v)denote the sum of the color of a vertex v and the colors of edges incident with v.The least number k needed for such a total coloring of G,denoted byχ∑\"is the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number.Pilsniak and Wozniak conjecturedχ∑\"(G)≤Δ(G)+3 for any simple graph with maximum degreeΔ(G).By using the famous Combinatorial Nullstellensatz,we prove that above conjecture holds for any triangle free IC-planar graph with△(G)≥7.Moreover,it holds for any triangle free planar graph withΔ(G)≥6. 相似文献
10.
The neighbor-distinguishing total chromatic number of a graph is the smallest integer such that can be totally colored using colors with a condition that any two adjacent vertices have different sets of colors. In this paper, we give a sufficient and necessary condition for a planar graph with maximum degree 13 to have or . Precisely, we show that if is a planar graph of maximum degree 13, then ; and if and only if contains two adjacent 13-vertices. 相似文献
11.
12.
Consider a simple graph and its proper edge coloring c with the elements of the set . We say that c is neighbor set distinguishing (or adjacent strong) if for every edge , the set of colors incident with u is distinct from the set of colors incident with v. Let us then consider a stronger requirement and suppose we wish to distinguishing adjacent vertices by sums of their incident colors. In both problems the challenging conjectures presume that such colorings exist for any graph G containing no isolated edges if only . We prove that in both problems is sufficient. The proof is based on the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, applied in the “sum environment.” In fact the identical bound also holds if we use any set of k real numbers instead of as edge colors, and the same is true in list versions of the both concepts. In particular, we therefore obtain that lists of length ( in fact) are sufficient for planar graphs. 相似文献
13.
14.
A total k-coloring c of a graph G is a proper total coloring c of G using colors of the set[k] = {1, 2,..., k}. Let f(u) denote the sum of the color on a vertex u and colors on all the edges incident to u. A k-neighbor sum distinguishing total coloring of G is a total k-coloring of G such that for each edge uv ∈ E(G), f(u) = f(v). By χ nsd(G), we denote the smallest value k in such a coloring of G. Pil′sniak and Wo′zniak conjectured that χ nsd(G) ≤Δ(G) + 3 for any simple graph with maximum degree Δ(G). In this paper, by using the famous Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, we prove that the conjecture holds for any triangle free planar graph with maximum degree at least 7. 相似文献
15.
An adjacent vertex distinguishing edge coloring of a graph G without isolated edges is its proper edge coloring such that no pair of adjacent vertices meets the same set of colors in G. We show that such coloring can be chosen from any set of lists associated to the edges of G as long as the size of every list is at least , where Δ is the maximum degree of G and C is a constant. The proof is probabilistic. The same is true in the environment of total colorings. 相似文献
16.
Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings of graphs with bounded maximum average degree 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
A proper [h]-total coloring c of a graph G is a proper total coloring c of G using colors of the set [h]={1,2,...,h}.Letw(u) denote the sum of the color on a vertex u and colors on all the edges incident to u.For each edge uv∈E(G),if w(u)≠w(v),then we say the coloring c distinguishes adjacent vertices by sum and call it a neighbor sum distinguishing [h]-total coloring of G.By tndi(G),we denote the smallest value h in such a coloring of G.In this paper,we obtain that G is a graph with at least two vertices,if mad(G)3,then tndi∑(G)≤k+2 where k=max{Δ(G),5}.It partially con?rms the conjecture proposed by Pil′sniak and Wozniak. 相似文献
17.
We give a simple algorithm for finding a minimum weight odd circuit in planar graphs. By geometric duality, the same algorithm can be used to find minimum weight odd cuts. For general sparse graphs, the fastest known algorithms for these two problems take time and time, respectively. 相似文献
18.
设f是图G的一个正常全染色.对任意x∈V(G),令C(x)表示与点x相关联或相邻的元素的颜色以及点x的颜色所构成的集合.若对任意u,v∈V(G),u≠v,有C(u)≠C(v),则称.f是图G的一个点强可区别全染色,对一个图G进行点强可区别全染色所需的最少的颜色的数目称为G的点强可区别全色数,记为X_(vst)(G).讨论了完全二部图K_(1,n),K_(2,n)和L_(3,n)的点强可区别全色数,利用组合分析法,得到了当n≥3时,X_(vst)(K_(1,n)=n+1,当n≥4时,X_(vst)(K_(2,n)=n+2,当n≥5时,X_(vst)(K_(3,n))=n+2. 相似文献
19.
Dan Hefetz 《Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B》2011,101(6):403-414
In a seminal paper (Alon and Tarsi, 1992 [6]), Alon and Tarsi have introduced an algebraic technique for proving upper bounds on the choice number of graphs (and thus, in particular, upper bounds on their chromatic number). The upper bound on the choice number of G obtained via their method, was later coined the Alon–Tarsi number of G and was denoted by AT(G) (see e.g. Jensen and Toft (1995) [20]). They have provided a combinatorial interpretation of this parameter in terms of the eulerian subdigraphs of an appropriate orientation of G. Their characterization can be restated as follows. Let D be an orientation of G. Assign a weight ωD(H) to every subdigraph H of D: if H⊆D is eulerian, then ωD(H)=(−1)e(H), otherwise ωD(H)=0. Alon and Tarsi proved that AT(G)?k if and only if there exists an orientation D of G in which the out-degree of every vertex is strictly less than k, and moreover ∑H⊆DωD(H)≠0. Shortly afterwards (Alon, 1993 [3]), for the special case of line graphs of d-regular d-edge-colorable graphs, Alon gave another interpretation of AT(G), this time in terms of the signed d-colorings of the line graph. In this paper we generalize both results. The first characterization is generalized by showing that there is an infinite family of weight functions (which includes the one considered by Alon and Tarsi), each of which can be used to characterize AT(G). The second characterization is generalized to all graphs (in fact the result is even more general—in particular it applies to hypergraphs). We then use the second generalization to prove that χ(G)=ch(G)=AT(G) holds for certain families of graphs G. Some of these results generalize certain known choosability results. 相似文献
20.
Remarks on the bondage number of planar graphs 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
The bondage number b(G) of a nonempty graph G is the cardinality of a smallest set of edges whose removal from G results in a graph with domination number greater than the domination number γ(G) of G. In 1998, J.E. Dunbar, T.W. Haynes, U. Teschner, and L. Volkmann posed the conjecture b(G)Δ(G)+1 for every nontrivial connected planar graph G. Two years later, L. Kang and J. Yuan proved b(G)8 for every connected planar graph G, and therefore, they confirmed the conjecture for Δ(G)7. In this paper we show that this conjecture is valid for all connected planar graphs of girth g(G)4 and maximum degree Δ(G)5 as well as for all not 3-regular graphs of girth g(G)5. Some further related results and open problems are also presented. 相似文献