An Lp bound for the Riesz and Bessel potentials of orthonormal functions

Let ψ₁, …,ψ_N be orthonormal functions in $\text{R}$^d and let $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= (?Δ)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$, or $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= (?Δ + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$, and let $\text{p(x) = ∑¦u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦}{}^2$. L^p bounds are proved for p, an example being $\text{∥p∥}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{? A}{}_{\mathrm{d}}\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{for}\text{d ? 3}$, with p = d(d ? 2)^?1. The unusual feature of these bounds is that the orthogonality of the ψ_i, yields a factor $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}$ instead of N, as would be the case without orthogonality. These bounds prove some conjectures of Battle and Federbush (a Phase Cell Cluster Expansion for Euclidean Field Theories, I, 1982, preprint) and of Conlon (Comm. Math. Phys., in press).     

Generalizations of two inequalities involving hermitian forms

Let λ₁ and λ_N be, respectively, the greatest and smallest eigenvalues of an N×N hermitian matrix H=(h_ij), and x=(x₁,x₂,…,x_N) with (x,x)=1. Then, it is known that (1) λ₁?(x,Hx)?λ_N and (2) if, in addition, H is positive definite, $\text{(λ}{}_1\text{+λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{)}{}^2\text{4λ}{}_1\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{?(x,Hx)(x,H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{x)?1}$. Assuming that y=(y₁,y₂,…, y_N) and |y_i|?1, i=1,2,…,N, it is shown in this paper that these inequalities remain true if H and H^?1 are, respectively, replaced by the Hadamard products $\text{M(y)1H}$ and $\text{M(y)1H}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, where M(y) is a matrix defined by $\text{M(y)=(δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{+(1?δ}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{)}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}$. Subsequently, these results are extended to improve the spectral bounds of $\text{M(y)1H}$.     

Compositions of singular integral operators

The composition of two Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operators is given explicitly in terms of the kernels of the operators. For φ?L¹(Rⁿ) and ε = 0 or 1 and ∝ φ = 0 if ε = 0, let Ker(φ) be the unique function on R^{n + 1} homogeneous of degree ?n ? 1 of parity ε that equals φ on the hypersurface x₀ = 1. Let Sing(φ, ε) denote the singular integral operator , which exists under suitable growth conditions on ? and φ. Then Sing(φ, ε₁) Sing(ψ, ε₂)f = ?2π²(∝ φ)(∝ ψ)f + Sing(A, ε₁, + ε₂)f, where

(with notation $\text{¦t¦}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{= ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{and}\text{¦t¦}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{= ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{sgn}\text{t}$). This result is used to show that the mapping ψ → A is a classical pseudo-differential operator of order zero if φ is smooth, with top-order symbol

$\text{ω}{}_0\text{(x,?)=?πiθ(?)∫θ(x?y)}\text{sgn}\text{y·?dy}\text{if}\text{?}{}_1\text{=1}$

,

$\text{=?2θ(?)∫θ(x?y)}\text{log}\text{|y·?|dy}\text{if}\text{?}{}_1\text{=0}$

where θ(ξ) is a cut-off function. These results are generalized to singular integrals with mixed homogeneity.     

Infinite-variate wide-sense Markov processes and functional analysis for bounded operator-forming vectors

Let p, q be arbitrary parameter sets, and let $\text{H}$ be a Hilbert space. We say that x = (xⁱ)_i?q, xⁱ ? $\text{H}$, is a bounded operator-forming vector (?$\text{H}$_F^q) if the Gram matrix 〈x, x〉 = [(xⁱ, x^j)]_i?q,j?q is the matrix of a bounded (necessarily ≥ 0) operator on $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$, the Hilbert space of square-summable complex-valued functions on q. Let A be p × q, i.e., let A be a linear operator from $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$ to $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^2$. Then exists a linear operator ǎ from (the Banach space) $\text{H}$_F^q to $\text{H}$_F^p on $\text{D}$(A) = {x:x ? $\text{H}$_F^q, $\text{A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is p × q bounded on $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$} such that y = ǎx satisfies y^j?σ(x) = {space spanned by the xⁱ}, 〈y, x〉 = A〈x, x〉 and $\text{〈y, y〉 = A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}{}^1$. This is a generalization of our earlier [J. Multivariate Anal.4 (1974), 166–209; 6 (1976), 538–571] results for the case of a spectral measure concentrated on one point. We apply these tools to investigate q-variate wide-sense Markov processes.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Sublinear perturbations of the differential equation y(n) = 0 and of the analogous difference equation

According to a result of A. Ghizzetti, for any solution y(t) of the differential equation where $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(t)+}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n?1}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) y}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)=0}\text{(t ? 1)}$, $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦x}{}^{\mathrm{n?I?1}}\text{dx < ∞}$ (0 ?i ? n ?1, either y(t) = 0 for t ? 1 or there is an integer r with 0 ? r ? n ? 1 such that $\text{lim}\text{t → ∞}\text{y(t)}\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$ exists and ≠0. Related results are obtained for difference and differential inequalities. A special case of the former has interesting applications in the study of orthogonal polynomials.     

Spectral representation for Schrödinger operators with long-range potentials

A spectral representation for the self-adjoint Schrödinger operator H = ?Δ + V(x), x? R³, is obtained, where V(x) is a long-range potential: $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(1</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, grad $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(3</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, $\text{ΛV(x) = O(¦ x}\text{s}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?\delta }}\text{) (δ > 0), Λ}$ being the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere Ω. Namely, we shall construct a unitary operator $\text{F}$ from PL₂(R³) onto $\text{L}{}_2\text{((0, ∞); L}{}_2\text{(Ω)), P}$ being the orthogonal projection onto the absolutely continuous subspace for H, such that for any Borel function α(λ),

$\text{(α(H)(Pf,g)=}\text{∫}\text{0}\text{∞}\text{(α(λ)(Ff)(λ),(Fg)(λ))L}{}_2\text{(ω) dλ}$

.     

Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

Harmonic analysis on hyperboloids

The regular representation of O(n, N) acting on $\text{L}{}^2\text{(}\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}\text{)}$ is decomposed into a direct integral of irreducible representations. The homogeneous space $\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}$ is realized as the Hyperboloid $\text{H = {(x, t) ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; N}}\text{: ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{? ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= 1}}$. The problem is essentially equivalent to finding the spectral resolution of a certain self-adjoint invariant differential operator □_h on H, which is the tangential part of the operator □ = Δ_x ? Δ_t on R^{n + N}. The spectrum of □_h contains a discrete part (except when N = 1) with eigenfunctions generated by restricting to H solutions of □u = 0 which vanish in the region $\text{¦ t ¦ < ¦ x ¦}$, and a continuous part $\text{H}$_?. As a representation of O(n, N), $\text{H}$_? ⊕ $\text{H}$_? is unitarily equivalent to the regular representation on L² of the cone $\text{{(x, t) : ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{}}$, and the intertwining operator is obtained by solving the equation □u = 0 with given boundary values on the cone. Explicit formulas are given for the spectral decomposition. The special case n = N = 2 gives the Plancherel formula for SL(2, R).     

An integral operator connected with the Helmholtz equation

Let Lu be the integral operator defined by $\text{(L}{}_{\mathrm{k?}}\text{)(x, y) = ∝ s ∝ ?(x′, y′)(}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{ik?}}\text{?}\text{) dx′ dy′, (x, y) ? S}$ where S is the interior of a smooth, closed Jordan curve in the plane, k is a complex number with Re k ? 0, Im k ? 0, and ?² = (x ?x′)² + (y ? y′)². We define $\text{q(x, y) = [}\text{dist}\text{((x, y), ?S)]}\text{1}\text{2}\text{, (x, y) ? S; L}{}_2\text{(q, S) = {? : ∝ s ∝ ¦ ?(x, y)¦}{}^2\text{q(x, y) dx dy < ∞}; W}{}_2{}^1\text{(q, S) = {? : ? ? L}{}_2\text{(q, S),}\text{??}\text{?x}\text{,}\text{?f}\text{?y}\text{? L}{}_2\text{(q, S)}}$, where in the definition of W₂¹(q, S) the derivatives are taken in the sense of distributions. We prove that L_k is a continuous 1-l mapping of L₂(q, S) onto W₂¹(q, S).     

A regularity result for singular nonlinear elliptic systems in inverse-power weighted Sobolev spaces

The compactness method to weighted spaces is extended to prove the following theorem:Let H_2,s¹(B₁) be the weighted Sobolev space on the unit ball in Rⁿ with norm

$\text{6ν6}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{2,s}}\text{=}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|ν|}{}^2\text{dx + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|Dν|}{}^2\text{dx.}$

Let n ? 2 ? s < n. Let u? [H_2,s¹(B₁) ∩ L^∞(B₁)]^N be a solution of the nonlinear elliptic system

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x,u) D}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{j\psi }}{}_{\mathrm{K}}\text{dx=0}$

, $\text{∨}\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{¦C}{}_0{}^1\text{(B}{}_1\text{)¦}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{where}\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}\text{¦ ? L, A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}$ are uniformly continuous functions of their arguments and satisfy:

$\text{|η|}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{N}\text{|η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{|}{}^2\text{?}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{,}\text{?η?R}{}^{\mathrm{Nn}}$

. Then there exists an R₁, 0 < R₁ < 1, and an α, 0 < α < 1, along with a set $\text{Ω ? B}{}_1$ such that (1) $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 2}}\text{(Ω) = 0}$, (2) Ω does not contain the origin; Ω does not contain B_R1, (3) $\text{B}{}_1\text{? Ω}$ is open, (4) u is $\text{Lip}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(B}{}_1\text{? Ω)}$; u is Lip_αB_R1.     

The spectra of composition operators on Hp

For H^p, 1 ? p < ∞, composition operators C_?, defined by $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{(?) = ? ° ?}$ for $\text{? ? H}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, ? analytic on $\text{D = {z ¦ ¦ z ¦ < 1}}$ are considered, and their spectra determined in the case where ? is analytic on an open region containing D?.     

Decomposability of symmetric multilinear functions

Let V denote a finite dimensional vector space over a field K of characteristic 0, let T_n(V) denote the vector space whose elements are the K-valued n-linear functions on V, and let S_n(V) denote the subspace of T_n(V) whose members are the fully symmetric members of T_n(V). If $\text{L}$_n denotes the symmetric group on {1,2,…,n} then we define the projection $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{: T}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V) → S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V)}$ by the formula , where P_σ : T_n(V) → T_n(V) is defined so that P_σ(A)(y₁,y₂,…,y_n = A(y_σ(1),y_σ(2),…,y_σ(n)) for each A?T_n(V) and y_i?V, 1 ? i ? n. If $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, then x₁?x₂? … ?x_n denotes the member of T_n(V) such that $\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{· ? ? ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)(y}{}_1\text{,y}{}_2\text{,…,y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) = П}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ for each y₁ ,₂,…,y_n in V, and x₁·x₂… x_n denotes $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{? … ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$. If B? S_n(V) and there exists $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, such that B = x₁·x₂…x_n, then B is said to be decomposable. We present two sets of necessary and sufficient conditions for a member B of S_n(V) to be decomposable. One of these sets is valid for an arbitrary field of characteristic zero, while the other requires that K = R or C.     

A method of feasible directions using function approximations,with applications to min max problems

This paper presents a demonstrably convergent method of feasible directions for solving the problem min{φ(ξ)| gⁱ(ξ)?0i=1,2,…,m}, which approximates, adaptively, both φ(x) and ▽φ(x). These approximations are necessitated by the fact that in certain problems, such as when $\text{φ(x) =}\text{max}\text{{f(x, y) ¦ y ? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{}}$, a precise evaluation of φ(x) and ▽φ(x) is extremely costly. The adaptive procedure progressively refines the precision of the approximations as an optimum is approached and as a result should be much more efficient than fixed precision algorithms.It is outlined how this new algorithm can be used for solving problems of the form $\text{min}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{max}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{f(x, y)}$ under the assumption that Ωm_ξ={x|gⁱ(x)?0, j=1,…,s} ∩$\text{R}$ⁿ, Ω_y={y|ζ_i(y)?0, i-1,…,t} ∩ $\text{R}$^m, with f, g^j, ζⁱ continuously differentiable, f(x, ·) concave, ζⁱ convex for $\text{i = 1,…, t,}\text{and}\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{, Ω}{}_{\mathrm{y}}$ compact.     

Inner functions in the unit ball of Cn

Let B be the open unit ball of $\text{C}$ⁿ, n > 1. Let I (for “inner”) be the set of all u ? H °(B) that have $\text{¦u¦ = 1}$ a.e. on the boundary S of B. Aleksandrov proved recently that there exist nonconstant u ? I. This paper strengthens his basic theorem and provides further information about I and the algebra Q generated by I. Let XY be the finite linear span of products xy, x ? X, y ? Y, and let $\text{¦X¦}$ be the norm closure, in L^∞ = L^∞(S), of X. Some results: set I is dense in the unit ball of H^∞(B) in the compact-open topology. On $\text{S,}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q}$ is weak¹-dense in $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, ¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦}$ does not contain $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, C(S) ?¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ ¦}\text{H}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$. (When $\text{n = 1, ¦Q¦ = H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{and}\text{¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦ = L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$.) Every unimodular $\text{?}\text{?}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ is a pointwise limit a.e. of products $\text{u}\text{v}\text{?}\text{, u}\text{?}\text{I, ν}\text{?}\text{I}$. The zeros of every $\text{? ? 0}$ in the ball algebra (but not of every H^∞-function) can be matched by those of some u ? I, as can any finite number of derivatives at 0 if $\text{∥?∥}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{< 1}$. However, $\text{?}\text{u}$ cannot be bounded in B if u ? I is non-constant.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.