Ranking fuzzy numbers based on ideal solution

In this paper, we consider the factor of the decision maker’s risk preference, and define the left and right deviation degree respectively. Besides, we propose a new formula of the fuzzy degree. Then we get the multiattribute matrix of fuzzy numbers. We rank fuzzy numbers with the help of an ideal solution. Some numerical examples are displayed to illustrate the validity and advantages of the proposed ranking method.     

基于2可加模糊测度的多线性效用函数建模和求解

构建合适的多属性效用函数是多属性效用分析的关键。针对不同偏好假设,文献从可加独立、效用独立、效用依赖等分别进行了多属性效用函数构建的研究。然而,由于求解的复杂性,多属性效用理论的应用绝大部分限于可加效用函数和多乘效用函数。提出一种基于2可加模糊测度的多线性效用函数建模和求解方法。首先,证明多线性效用函数和基于模糊测度的多线性模型之间的等价性,提出利用基于模糊测度的多线性模型对多线性效用函数进行表示。其次,针对多线性模型的特点和模糊测度识别的复杂性,利用Banzhaf交互指数和2可加模糊测度对多线性模型进行表示,并利用最小方法差进行模糊测度和Banzhaf交互指数识别,进而实现多线性效用函数的求解。最后,将方法用于某可穿戴医疗设备基于顾客需求的多属性效用函数构建,确认了可行性。方法为多线性效用函数的求解提供了一种新思路。     

Experiments with an interactive paired comparison simplex method for molp problems

In this paper, an interactive paired comparison simplex based method formultiple objective linear programming (MOLP) problems is developed and compared to other interactive MOLP methods. The decision maker (DM)’s utility function is assumed to be unknown, but is an additive function of his known linearized objective functions. A test for ‘utility efficiency’ for MOLP problems is developed to reduce the number of efficient extreme points generated and the number of questions posed to the DM. The notion of ‘strength of preference ’ is developed for the assessment of the DM’s unknown utility function where he can express his preference for a pair of extreme points as ‘strong ’, ‘weak ’, or ‘almost indifferent ’. The problem of ‘inconsistency of the DM’ is formalized and its resolution is discussed. An example of the method and detailed computational results comparing it with other interactive MOLP methods are presented. Several performance measures for comparative evaluations of interactive multiple objective programming methods are also discussed. All rights reserved. This study, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without written permission of the authors.     

Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations

Interval fuzzy preference relation is a useful tool to express decision maker’s uncertain preference information. How to derive the priority weights from an interval fuzzy preference relation is an interesting and important issue in decision making with interval fuzzy preference relation(s). In this paper, some new concepts such as additive consistent interval fuzzy preference relation, multiplicative consistent interval fuzzy preference relation, etc., are defined. Some simple and practical linear programming models for deriving the priority weights from various interval fuzzy preference relations are established, and two numerical examples are provided to illustrate the developed models.     

Functional ANOVA,ultramodularity and monotonicity: Applications in multiattribute utility theory

Utility function properties as monotonicity and concavity play a fundamental role in reflecting a decision-maker’s preference structure. These properties are usually characterized via partial derivatives. However, elicitation methods do not necessarily lead to twice-differentiable utility functions. Furthermore, while in a single-attribute context concavity fully reflects risk aversion, in multiattribute problems such correspondence is not one-to-one. We show that Tsetlin and Winkler’s multivariate risk attitudes imply ultramodularity of the utility function. We demonstrate that geometric properties of a multivariate utility function can be successfully studied by utilizing an integral function expansion (functional ANOVA). The necessary and sufficient conditions under which monotonicity and/or ultramodularity of single-attribute functions imply the monotonicity and/or ultramodularity of the corresponding multiattribute function under additive, preferential and mutual utility independence are then established without reliance on the utility function differentiability. We also investigate the relationship between the presence of interactions among the attributes of a multiattribute utility function and the decision-maker’s multivariate risk attitudes.     

Group decision making based on intuitionistic multiplicative aggregation operators

Preference relations are the most common techniques to express decision maker’s preference information over alternatives or criteria. To consistent with the law of diminishing marginal utility, we use the asymmetrical scale instead of the symmetrical one to express the information in intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, and introduce a new kind of preference relation called the intuitionistic multiplicative preference relation, which contains two parts of information describing the intensity degrees that an alternative is or not priority to another. Some basic operations are introduced, based on which, an aggregation principle is proposed to aggregate the intuitionistic multiplicative preference information, the desirable properties and special cases are further discussed. Choquet Integral and power average are also applied to the aggregation principle to produce the aggregation operators to reflect the correlations of the intuitionistic multiplicative preference information. Finally, a method is given to deal with the group decision making based on intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations.     

Moments of utility functions and their applications

This paper presents moments and cross-moments of utility functions and measures of utility dependence. We start with an interpretation of the nth moment of a utility function, and describe methods for its assessment in practice and consistency checks that need to be satisfied for any assessed moments. We then show how moments of a utility function (i) provide a new method to determine the parameters of a given functional form of a utility function and (ii) to derive the functional form of a utility function that satisfies some given moment assessments. Next, we derive a fundamental formula that relates the expected utility of a joint distribution to the expected utility of the marginal distributions for multiattribute utility functions. We use this formulation to provide an intuitive interpretation for cross-moments of utility functions and illustrate their use in (i) constructing multiattribute utility functions that incorporate utility dependence and (ii) in providing necessary conditions for utility independence in decisions with multiple attributes. We end with a new measure of utility dependence for multiattribute utility functions and work through several examples to illustrate the approach.     

Mean-Value Theorems for Multiplicative Functions on Additive Arithmetic Semigroups via Halász’s Method

 We extend the mean-value theorems for multiplicative functions f on additive arithmetic semigroups, which satisfy the condition ∣f(a)∣≤1, to a wider class of multiplicative functions f for which ∣f(a)∣ is bounded in some average sense, via Halász’s method in classical probabilistic number theory. Received October 18, 2001; in final form April 11, 2002     

A generalized decomposable multiattribute utility function

In this paper a generalized decomposable multiattribute utility function (MAUF) is developed. It is demonstrated that this new MAUF structure is more general than other well-known MAUF structures, such as additive, multiplicative, and multilinear. Therefore, it is more flexible and does not require that the decision maker be consistent with restrictive assumptions such as preferential independence conditions about his/her preferences. We demonstrate that this structure does not require any underlying assumption and hence solves the interdependence among attributes. Hence there is no need for verification of its structure. Several useful extensions and properties for this generalized decomposable MAUF are developed which simplify its structure or assessment. The concept of utility efficiency is developed to identify efficient alternatives when there exists partial information on the scaling constants of an assumed MAUF. It is assumed that the structure (decomposition) of the MAUF is known and the partial information about the scaling constants of the decision maker is in the form of bounds or constraints. For the generalized decomposable structure, linear programming is sufficient to solve all ensuing problems. Some examples are provided.     

Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral

Within the multicriteria aggregation–disaggregation framework, ordinal regression aims at inducing the parameters of a decision model, for example those of a utility function, which have to represent some holistic preference comparisons of a Decision Maker (DM). Usually, among the many utility functions representing the DM’s preference information, only one utility function is selected. Since such a choice is arbitrary to some extent, recently robust ordinal regression has been proposed with the purpose of taking into account all the sets of parameters compatible with the DM’s preference information. Until now, robust ordinal regression has been implemented to additive utility functions under the assumption of criteria independence. In this paper we propose a non-additive robust ordinal regression on a set of alternatives A, whose utility is evaluated in terms of the Choquet integral which permits to represent the interaction among criteria, modelled by the fuzzy measures, parameterizing our approach.     

Solving the Shortest Path Problem with Interval Arcs

This paper presents an algorithm for the shortest path problem when the connected arcs in a transportation network are represented as interval numbers. The methodology proposed in this paper considers fuzzy preference ordering of intervals (Sengupta and Pal (2000), European Journal of Operational Research 127, 28–43) from pessimistic and optimistic decision maker’s point of view.     

Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information

This work exploits links between Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), with decision making units (DMUs) playing the role of decision alternatives. A novel perspective is suggested on the use of the additive DEA model in order to overcome some of its shortcomings, using concepts from multiattribute utility models with imprecise information. The underlying idea is to convert input and output factors into utility functions that are aggregated using a weighted sum (additive model of multiattribute utility theory), and then let each DMU choose the weights associated with these functions that minimize the difference of utility to the best DMU. The resulting additive DEA model with oriented projections has a clear rationale for its efficiency measures, and allows meaningful introduction of constraints on factor weights.     

Multi-criteria semantic dominance: A linguistic decision aiding technique based on incomplete preference information

A linguistic decision aiding technique for multi-criteria decision is presented. We define a relation between alternatives as multi-criteria semantic dominance (MCSD). It adopts the similar ideal of the stochastic dominance by utilizing the partial information of the decision maker’s preference, which is only ordinal or partially cardinal. The MCSD rules based on three typical types of semanteme functions are introduced and proven. By using these rules, all the alternatives under consideration are divided into two mutually exclusive sets called efficient set and inefficient set. The decision maker who has such a semanteme function will never choose the alternative from the corresponding inefficient set as the optimal one. In such a way, when we analyze the linguistic decision information, the inherent fuzziness of preference can be handled and several controversial operations of the linguistic terms can be avoided. An example is also provided to illustrate the procedure of the proposed method.     

The computational complexity of bilevel assignment problems

In bilevel optimization problems there are two decision makers, the leader and the follower, who act in a hierarchy. Each decision maker has his own objective function, but there are common constraints. This paper deals with bilevel assignment problems where each decision maker controls a subset of edges and each edge has a leader’s and a follower’s weight. The edges selected by the leader and by the follower need to form a perfect matching. The task is to determine which edges the leader should choose such that his objective value which depends on the follower’s optimal reaction is maximized. We consider sum- and bottleneck objective functions for the leader and follower. Moreover, if not all optimal reactions of the follower lead to the same leader’s objective value, then the follower either chooses an optimal reaction which is best (optimistic rule) or worst (pessimistic rule) for the leader. We show that all the variants arising if the leader’s and follower’s objective functions are sum or bottleneck functions are NP-hard if the pessimistic rule is applied. In case of the optimistic rule the problem is shown to be NP-hard if at least one of the decision makers has a sum objective function.     

Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations

A multiperson decision-making problem, where the information about the alternatives provided by the experts can be presented by means of different preference representation structures (preference orderings, utility functions and multiplicative preference relations) is studied. Assuming the multiplicative preference relation as the uniform element of the preference representation, a multiplicative decision model based on fuzzy majority is presented to choose the best alternatives. In this decision model, several transformation functions are obtained to relate preference orderings and utility functions with multiplicative preference relations. The decision model uses the ordered weighted geometric operator to aggregate information and two choice degrees to rank the alternatives, quantifier guided dominance degree and quantifier guided non-dominance degree. The consistency of the model is analysed to prove that it acts coherently.     

Mean-Value Theorems for Multiplicative Functions on Additive Arithmetic Semigroups via Halász’s Method

 We extend the mean-value theorems for multiplicative functions f on additive arithmetic semigroups, which satisfy the condition ∣f(a)∣≤1, to a wider class of multiplicative functions f for which ∣f(a)∣ is bounded in some average sense, via Halász’s method in classical probabilistic number theory.     

Pairwise comparison matrices and the error-free property of the decision maker

Pairwise comparison is a popular assessment method either for deriving criteria-weights or for evaluating alternatives according to a given criterion. In real-world applications consistency of the comparisons rarely happens: intransitivity can occur. The aim of the paper is to discuss the relationship between the consistency of the decision maker—described with the error-free property—and the consistency of the pairwise comparison matrix (PCM). The concept of error-free matrix is used to demonstrate that consistency of the PCM is not a sufficient condition of the error-free property of the decision maker. Informed and uninformed decision makers are defined. In the first stage of an assessment method a consistent or near-consistent matrix should be achieved: detecting, measuring and improving consistency are part of any procedure with both types of decision makers. In the second stage additional information are needed to reveal the decision maker’s real preferences. Interactive questioning procedures are recommended to reach that goal.     

Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making

Multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) elicits an individual decision maker’s preferences for single attributes and develops a utility function by mathematics formulation to add up the preferences of the entire set of attributes when assessing alternatives. A common aggregation method of MAUT for group decisions is the simple additive weighting (SAW) method, which does not consider the different preferential levels and preferential ranks for individual decision makers’ assessments of alternatives in a decision group, and thus seems too intuitive in achieving the consensus and commitment for group decision aggregation. In this paper, the preferential differences denoting the preference degrees among different alternatives and preferential priorities denoting the favorite ranking of the alternatives for each decision maker are both considered and aggregated to construct the utility discriminative values for assessing alternatives in a decision group. A comparative analysis is performed to compare the proposed approach to the SAW model, and a satisfaction index is used to investigate the satisfaction levels of the final two resulting group decisions. In addition, a feedback interview is conducted to understand the subjective perceptions of decision makers while examining the results obtained from these two approaches for the second practical case. Both investigation results show that the proposed approach is able to achieve a more satisfying and agreeable group decision than that of the SAW method.     

Extension of the LINMAP for multiattribute decision making under Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy environment

The aim of this article is further extending the linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) to develop a new methodology for solving multiattribute decision making (MADM) problems under Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) environments. The LINMAP only can deal with MADM problems in crisp environments. However, fuzziness is inherent in decision data and decision making processes. In this methodology, Atanassov’s IF sets are used to describe fuzziness in decision information and decision making processes by means of an Atanassov’s IF decision matrix. A Euclidean distance is proposed to measure the difference between Atanassov’s IF sets. Consistency and inconsistency indices are defined on the basis of preferences between alternatives given by the decision maker. Each alternative is assessed on the basis of its distance to an Atanassov’s IF positive ideal solution (IFPIS) which is unknown a prior. The Atanassov’s IFPIS and the weights of attributes are then estimated using a new linear programming model based upon the consistency and inconsistency indices defined. Finally, the distance of each alternative to the Atanassov’s IFPIS can be calculated to determine the ranking order of all alternatives. A numerical example is examined to demonstrate the implementation process of this methodology. Also it has been proved that the methodology proposed in this article can deal with MADM problems under not only Atanassov’s IF environments but also both fuzzy and crisp environments.