Prequantum Classical Statistical Field Theory: Schrödinger Dynamics of Entangled Systems as a Classical Stochastic Process

The idea that quantum randomness can be reduced to randomness of classical fields (fluctuating at time and space scales which are essentially finer than scales approachable in modern quantum experiments) is rather old. Various models have been proposed, e.g., stochastic electrodynamics or the semiclassical model. Recently a new model, so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT), was developed. By this model a “quantum system” is just a label for (so to say “prequantum”) classical random field. Quantum averages can be represented as classical field averages. Correlations between observables on subsystems of a composite system can be as well represented as classical correlations. In particular, it can be done for entangled systems. Creation of such classical field representation demystifies quantum entanglement. In this paper we show that quantum dynamics (given by Schrödinger’s equation) of entangled systems can be represented as the stochastic dynamics of classical random fields. The “effect of entanglement” is produced by classical correlations which were present at the initial moment of time, cf. views of Albert Einstein.     

对于“包含在连续谱量子体系中的决定论性”一文的讨论

对于具有连续能谱的单粒子量子体系,“包含在连续谱量子体系中的决定论性”一文用所谓“双波函数”来描述处于能量本征态的粒子系综中各粒子的量子行为,并且在所谓的“等价定理”中称:双波函数描述在经典极限下将化为经典力学描述.然而,此描述所给出的系综力学量观测值统计分布的预言与通常量子力学不相容;并且,该文对其“等价定理”的证明是不正确的,这个“定理”实际上不成立 关键词： 连续能谱量子体系 双波函数 经典极限     

Quantum particles from classical statistics

Quantum particles and classical particles are described in a common setting of classical statistical physics. The property of a particle being “classical” or “quantum” ceases to be a basic conceptual difference. The dynamics differs, however, between quantum and classical particles. We describe position, motion and correlations of a quantum particle in terms of observables in a classical statistical ensemble. On the other side, we also construct explicitly the quantum formalism with wave function and Hamiltonian for classical particles. For a suitable time evolution of the classical probabilities and a suitable choice of observables all features of a quantum particle in a potential can be derived from classical statistics, including interference and tunneling. Besides conceptual advances, the treatment of classical and quantum particles in a common formalism could lead to interesting cross‐fertilization between classical statistics and quantum physics.     

Is there a quantization condition for the classical problem of charge and pole?

In elementary derivations of the quantization of azimuthal angular momentum the eigenfunction is determined to be exp(im φ), which is “oversensitive” to the rotation φ → φ+2π, unlessm is an integer. In a recent paper Kerner examined the classical system of charge and magnetic pole, and expressed Π, a vector constant of motion for the system, in terms of a physical angle ψ, to deduce a remarkable paradox. Kerner pointed out that Π(ψ) is “oversensitive” to ψ → ψ+2π unless a certain charge quantization condition is met. Our explicandum of this paradox highlights the distinction between coordinates in classical and quantum physics. It is shown why the single-valuedness requirement on Π(ψ) is devoid of physical significance. We are finally led to examine the classical analog of the quantum mechanical argument that demonstrates the quantization of magnetic charge, to show that there is “no hope” of a classical quantization condition.     

An explanation of interference effects in the double slit experiment: Classical trajectories plus ballistic diffusion caused by zero-point fluctuations

A classical explanation of interference effects in the double slit experiment is proposed. We claim that for every single “particle” a thermal context can be defined, which reflects its embedding within boundary conditions as given by the totality of arrangements in an experimental apparatus. To account for this context, we introduce a “path excitation field”, which derives from the thermodynamics of the zero-point vacuum and which represents all possible paths a “particle” can take via thermal path fluctuations. The intensity distribution on a screen behind a double slit is calculated, as well as the corresponding trajectories and the probability density current. The trajectories are shown to obey a “no crossing” rule with respect to the central line, i.e., between the two slits and orthogonal to their connecting line. This agrees with the Bohmian interpretation, but appears here without the necessity of invoking the quantum potential.     

Universal invariants in quantum mechanics and physics of optical and particle beams

We give a brief review of the theory of quantum universal invariants and their counterparts in the physics of light and particle beams. The invariants concerned are certain combinations of the second- and higher-order moments (variances) of quantum-mechanical operators, or the transverse phase-space coordinates of the paraxial beams of light or particles. They are conserved in time (or along the beam axis) independently of the concrete form of the coefficients of the Schrödinger-like equations governing the evolution of the systems, provided that the effective Hamiltonian is either a generic quadratic form of the generalized coordinate-momenta operators or a linear combination of generators of some finite-dimensional algebra (in particular, any semisimple Lie algebra). Using the phase space representation of quantum mechanics (paraxial optics) in terms of the Wigner function, we elucidate the relation of the quantum (optical) invariants to the classical universal integral invariants of Poincaré and Cartan. The specific features of Gaussian beams are discussed as examples. The concept of the universal quantum integrals of motion is introduced, and examples of the “universal invariant solutions” to the Schrödinger equation, i.e., self-consistent eigenstates of the universal integrals of motion, are given.     

A categorical framework for quantum theory

Underlying any physical theory is a layer of conceptual frames. They connect the mathematical structures used in theoretical models with the phenomena, but they also constitute our fundamental assumptions about reality. Many of the discrepancies between quantum physics and classical physics (including Maxwell's electrodynamics and relativity) can be traced back to these categorical foundations. We argue that classical physics corresponds to the factual aspects of reality and requires a categorical framework which consists of four interdependent components: boolean logic, the linear‐sequential notion of time, the principle of sufficient reason, and the dichotomy between observer and observed. None of these can be dropped without affecting the others. However, quantum theory also addresses the “status nascendi” of facts, i.e., their coming into being. Therefore, quantum physics requires a different conceptual framework which will be elaborated in this article. It is shown that many of its components are already present in the standard formalisms of quantum physics, but in most cases they are highlighted not so much from a conceptual perspective but more from their mathematical structures. The categorical frame underlying quantum physics includes a profoundly different notion of time which encompasses a crucial role for the present. The article introduces the concept of a categorical apparatus (a framework of interdependent categories), explores the appropriate apparatus for classical and quantum theory, and elaborates in particular on the category of non‐sequential time and an extended present which seems to be relevant for a quantum theory of (space)‐time.     

Comparison of classical and quantum lattice properties with the aid of cellular automata

Classical and quantum lattice properties are compared by studying the effect of “local” rules applied simultaneously to all individual sites of a given array on the formation of structures on a more “global” level, where the latter are large scale patterns of evolution maps for such arrays. As a classical model, the rotation-representation matrix is used operating on an array of angular- momentum eigenstates, while for the study of a quantum mechanical lattice the previously introduced quantum mechanical cellular automata are investigated. Apart from a presentation of results which hold for each of the two classes of lattices separately, they are also compared in terms of their reversibility and/or irreversibility properties. In particular, an interesting similarity is found between classical “order through fluctuations” phenomena and properties of simple quantum mechanical lattices, which may eventually be used to model time-reversible quantum systems on the basis of underlying irreversible processes.