2‐Propynyl 2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐α‐d‐mannopyranoside

The 2‐propynyl group in the title compound, C₁₇H₂₂O₁₀, adopts an exoanomeric conformation, with the acetylenic group gauche with respect to position C1. Comparison of ¹³C NMR chemical shifts from solution and the solid state suggest that the acetylenic group also adopts a conformation anti to C1 in solution. The pyranose ring adopts a ⁴C₁ conformation. Of the three secondary O‐acetyl groups, that on position O4, flanked by two equatorial groups, adopts a syn conformation, in agreement with recent generalizations [González‐Outeiriño, Nasser & Anderson (2005). J. Org. Chem. 70 , 2486–2493]. The acetyl group on position O3 adopts a gauche conformation, also in agreement with the recent generalizations, but that on position O2 adopts a syn conformation, not in agreement with the recent generalizations.     

2,3,4,6‐Tetra‐O‐acetyl‐α‐d‐glucopyranosyl azide

The Cu^I‐catalysed 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition of an azide and a terminal alkyne is becoming an increasingly popular tool for synthetic chemists. This is the most representative of the so‐called `click reactions' and it is used to generate 1,4‐disubstituted triazoles in high yield. During studies on such cycloaddition reactions, a reduced reactivity of an α‐glucosyl azide with respect to the corresponding β‐anomer was observed. With the aim of understanding this phenomenon, the structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₉N₃O₉, has been determined at 140 K. The glucopyranosyl ring appears in a regular ⁴C₁ chair conformation with all the substituents in equatorial positions, except for the anomeric azide group, which adopts an axial orientation. The observed bond lengths are consistent with a strong anomeric effect, which is reflected in a change in dipolar character and hence reduced reactivity of the α‐glucosyl azide.     

1‐{5‐[2‐(Tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]‐1,3,4‐thia­diazol‐2‐yl}guanidinium chloride

In the title compound, C₁₀H₉F₃N₅S⁺·Cl^?, which was developed as a potential anticonvulsant, the phenyl ring, the thia­diazo­le ring and the guanidinium moiety are all planar. There is a dihedral angle of 48.9 (1)° between the thia­diazole and phenyl rings which prevents steric hindrance arising from the π bonds within the former, and the tri­fluoro­phenyl moiety attached to the latter. The thia­diazole and guanidinium moieties are twisted by 12.7 (2)° with respect to each other. An extensive network of hydrogen bonds, predominantly involving the chloride ion, maintains the crystal structure.     

Methyl 4‐O‐β‐d‐galacto­pyran­osyl α‐d‐gluco­pyran­oside (methyl α‐lactoside)

Methyl α‐lactoside, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁, (I), is described by glycosidic torsion angles ϕ (O5_gal—C1_gal—O1_gal—C4_glc) and ψ (C1_gal—O1_gal—C4_glc—C5_glc), which have values of −93.52 (13) and −144.83 (11)°, respectively, where the ring atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 is the anomeric C atom and C6 is the exocyclic hydroxy­methyl (–CH₂OH) C atom in both residues. The linkage geometry is similar to that observed in methyl β‐lactoside methanol solvate, (II), in which ϕ is −88.4 (4)° and ψ is −161.3 (4)°. As in (II), an inter­molecular O3_glc—H⋯O5_gal hydrogen bond is observed in (I). The hydroxy­methyl group conformation in both residues is gauche–trans, with torsion angles ω_gal (O5_gal—C5_gal—C6_gal—O6_gal) and ω_glc (O5_glc—C5_glc—C6_glc—O6_glc) of 69.15 (13) and 72.55 (14)°, respectively. The latter torsion angle differs substantially from that found for (II) [−54.6 (2)°; gauche–gauche]. Cocrystallization of methanol, which is hydrogen bonded to O6_glc in the crystal structure of (II), presumably affects the hydroxy­methyl conformation in the Glc residue in (II).     

Methyl 3,6‐di‐O‐pivaloyl‐α‐d‐manno­pyran­oside

The X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the title compound, C₁₇H₃₀O₈, revealed a ⁴C₁ conformation of the pyran­osyl ring [Cremer–Pople puckering parameters of Q = 0.568 (2) Å, θ = 5.1 (2) and ϕ = 218 (3)°]. The structure shows no deviations from the geometric parameters of pyran­oside carbohydrates. The hydroxyl groups participate in O—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, forming a two‐dimensional pattern [O⃛O = 2.811 (3) and 2.995 (3) Å].     

O‐Ethyl and O‐methyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl)thiocarbamate

In both the title structures, O‐ethyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­thio­carbam­ate, C₁₇H₂₅NO₁₀S, and O‐methyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­thiocar­bam­ate, C₁₆H₂₃NO₁₀S, the hexo­pyran­osyl ring adopts the ⁴C₁ conformation. All the ring substituents are in equatorial positions. The acetoxy­methyl group is in a gauche–gauche conformation. The S atom is in a synperi­planar conformation, while the C—N—C—O linkage is antiperiplanar. N—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into infinite chains and these are connected by C—H?O interactions.     

16‐Cyano‐13α‐(5‐methyl‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazol‐2‐yl)‐13,16‐seco‐17‐nor­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compound, C₂₃H₃₁N₃O₃, the outer cyclo­hexane rings have chair conformations, while the central cyclohexene ring adopts a half‐chair conformation. In the solid state, intra‐ and intermolecular C—H⋯N interactions are observed.     

p‐Cresyl 2,3‐an­hydro‐5‐deoxy‐5‐phthal­imido‐1‐thio‐α‐d‐lyxo­furan­oside

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₂₀H₁₇NO₄S, (I), was determined in order to compare the solution and solid‐state conformations. The mol­ecule was synthesized as a building block for incorporation into oligosaccharides comprised of conformationally restricted furan­ose residues. The furan­ose ring adopts an envelope conformation with the ring O atom displaced above the plane (an ^OE conformation). The pseudorotational phase angle (P) is 88.6° and the puckering amplitude (τ_m) is 31.5°. The C₂—C₁—S—C(Ph) torsion angle is ?163.2 (2)°, which places the aglycone in the exo‐anomeric effect preferred position. The C1—S—C14 bond angle is 99.02 (13)° and the plane of the cresyl moiety is oriented nearly parallel to the four in‐plane atoms of the furan­ose ring envelope. The orientation about the C4—C5 bond is gauche–gauche [Bock & Duus (1994). J. Carbohydr. Chem. 13 , 513–543].     

1‐(β‐d‐Erythrofuranos­yl)cytidine (β‐erythrocytidine)

1‐(β‐d ‐Erythrofuranosyl)cytidine, C₈H₁₁N₃O₄, (I), a derivative of β‐cytidine, (II), lacks an exocyclic hydroxy­methyl (–CH₂OH) substituent at C4′ and crystallizes in a global conformation different from that observed for (II). In (I), the β‐d ‐erythrofuranosyl ring assumes an E₃ conformation (C3′‐exo; S, i.e. south), and the N‐glycoside bond conformation is syn. In contrast, (II) contains a β‐d ‐ribofuranosyl ring in a ³T₂ conformation (N, i.e. north) and an anti‐N‐glycoside linkage. These crystallographic properties mimic those found in aqueous solution by NMR with respect to furan­ose conformation. Removal of the –CH₂OH group thus affects the global conformation of the aldofuranosyl ring. These results provide further support for S/syn–anti and N/anti correlations in pyrimidine nucleosides. The crystal structure of (I) was determined at 200 K.     

Methyl 4‐O‐β‐d‐galactopyranosyl α‐d‐mannopyranoside methanol 0.375‐solvate

Methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐α‐d ‐mannopyranoside methanol 0.375‐solvate, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁·0.375CH₃OH, (I), was crystallized from a methanol–ethanol solvent system in a glycosidic linkage conformation, with ϕ′ (O5_Gal—C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_Man) = −68.2 (3)° and ψ′ (C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_Man—C5_Man) = −123.9 (2)°, where the ring is defined by atoms O5/C1–C5 (monosaccharide numbering); C1 denotes the anomeric C atom and C6 the exocyclic hydroxymethyl C atom in the βGalp and αManp residues, respectively. The linkage conformation in (I) differs from that in crystalline methyl α‐lactoside [methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐α‐d ‐glucopyranoside], (II) [Pan, Noll & Serianni (2005). Acta Cryst. C 61 , o674–o677], where ϕ′ is −93.6° and ψ′ is −144.8°. An intermolecular hydrogen bond exists between O3_Man and O5_Gal in (I), similar to that between O3_Glc and O5_Gal in (II). The structures of (I) and (II) are also compared with those of their constituent residues, viz. methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranoside, methyl α‐d ‐glucopyranoside and methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranoside, revealing significant differences in the Cremer–Pople puckering parameters, exocyclic hydroxymethyl group conformations and intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding patterns.     

Methyl 2‐O‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐α‐l‐rhamnopyranoside

The overall conformation of the title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₀, is described by the glycosidic torsion angles ?_H (H1_g—C1_g—O2_r—C2_r) and ψ_H (C1_g—O2_r—C2_r—H2_r), which have values of 13.6 and 16.1°, respectively. The former is significantly different from the value predicted by consideration of the exo‐anomeric effect (?_H～ 60°) and from that in solution (?_H～ 50°), as determined previously by NMR spectroscopy. An intramolecular O3_r—H?O2_g hydrogen bond may help to stabilize the conformation in the solid state. The orientation of the hydroxy­methyl group of the glucose residue is gauche–gauche, with a torsion angle ω (O5_g—C5_g—C6_g—O6_g) of ?70.4 (4)°. Both pyranose rings are in their expected chair conformations, i.e.⁴C₁ for d ‐glucose and ¹C₄ for l ‐rhamnose.     

Methyl 3‐O‐β‐l‐fucopyranosyl α‐d‐glucopyranoside trihydrate

The water content of the title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₀·3H₂O, creates an extensive hydrogen‐bonding pattern, with all the hydroxyl groups of the disaccharide acting as hydrogen‐bond donors and acceptors. The water molecules are arranged in columns along the crystallographic b axis and form, together with one of the hydroxyl groups, infinite hydrogen‐bonded chains. The conformation of the disaccharide is described by glycosidic torsion angles of −38 and 18°.     

Azin­yl sulfides. LXXXI. 14‐Phen­yl‐7‐thia­pyrano[2,3‐c;6,5‐c′]diquinoline‐14‐carbonitrile

The mol­ecules of the title compound, C₂₆H₁₅N₃S, have a penta­cyclic ring system which is almost planar, with the central ring in a flattened boat conformation. The folding angle between the two quinoline rings is 6.75 (7)°. The 14‐phen­yl substituent is in a quasi‐axial conformation, while the 14‐cyano substituent is in a quasi‐equatorial conformation with respect to the thio­pyran ring. The S⋯C—C_phen­yl and S⋯C—C_CN angles are 116.8 (2) and 129.3 (2)°, respectively. The plane of the phen­yl group is nearly coplanar with the plane bis­ecting the dihedral angle of the penta­cyclic ring system.     

5β,6β‐Epoxy‐17‐oxoandrostan‐3β‐yl acetate and 5β,6β‐epoxy‐20‐oxopregnan‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compounds, C₂₁H₃₀O₄, (I), and C₂₃H₃₄O₄, (II), respectively, which are valuable intermediates in the synthesis of important steroid derivatives, rings A and B are cis‐(5β,10β)‐fused. The two molecules have similar conformations of rings A, B and C. The presence of the 5β,6β‐epoxide group induces a significant twist of the steroid nucleus and a strong flattening of the B ring. The different C17 substituents result in different conformations for ring D. Cohesion of the molecular packing is achieved in both compounds only by weak intermolecular interactions. The geometries of the molecules in the crystalline environment are compared with those of the free molecules as given by ab initio Roothan Hartree–Fock calculations. We show in this work that quantum mechanical ab initio methods reproduce well the details of the conformation of these molecules, including a large twist of the steroid nucleus. The calculated twist values are comparable, but are larger than the observed values, indicating a possible small effect of the crystal packing on the twist angles.     

Methyl 4‐O‐benzoyl‐2,3‐O‐isopropyl­idene‐α‐l‐rhamnopyran­oside

The title compound, C₁₇H₂₂O₆, has an exocyclic ester group at the hexopyranosyl sugar residue. The carbonyl group shows a conformation that is eclipsed with respect to the adjacent ring C—H bond. The two ester torsion angles are denoted by syn and cis conformations. One of these torsion angles is indicated to have a similar conformation in solution, as analyzed by NMR spectroscopy and a Karplus‐type relationship.     

Oxidative Fragmentations of the 5α‐ and 5β‐Hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐ 3β‐yl Acetates

Oxidations of 5α‐hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐3β‐yl acetate ( 8 ) with Pb(OAc)₄ under thermal or photolytic conditions or in the presence of iodine afforded only complex mixtures of compounds. However, the HgO/I₂ version of the hypoiodite reaction gave as the primary products the stereoisomeric (Z)‐ and (E)‐1(10)‐unsaturated 5,10‐seco B‐nor‐derivatives 10 and 11 , and the stereoisomeric (5R,10R)‐ and (5S,10S)‐acetals 14 and 15 (Scheme 4). Further reaction of these compounds under conditions of their formation afforded, in addition, the A‐nor 1,5‐cyclization products 13 and 16 (from 10 ) and 12 (from 11 ) (see also Scheme 6) and the 6‐iodo‐5,6‐secolactones 17 and 19 (from 14 and 15 , resp.) and 4‐iodo‐4,5‐secolactone 18 (from 15 ) (see also Scheme 7). Oxidations of 5β‐hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐3β‐yl acetate ( 9 ) with both hypoiodite‐forming reagents (Pb(OAc)₄/I₂ and HgO/I₂) proceeded similarly to the HgO/I₂ reaction of the corresponding 5α‐hydroxy analogue 8 . Photolytic Pb(OAc)₄ oxidation of 9 afforded, in addition to the (Z)‐ and (E)‐5,10‐seco 1(10)‐unsaturated ketones 10 and 11 , their isomeric 5,10‐seco 10(19)‐unsaturated ketone 22 , the acetal 5‐acetate 21 , and 5β,19‐epoxy derivative 23 (Scheme 9). Exceptionally, in the thermal Pb(OAc)₄ oxidation of 9 , the 5,10‐seco ketones 10, 11 , and 22 were not formed, the only reaction being the stereoselective formation of the 5,10‐ethers with the β‐oriented epoxy bridge, i.e. the (10R)‐enol ether 20 and (5S,10R)‐acetal 5‐acetate 21 (Scheme 8). Possible mechanistic interpretations of the above transformations are discussed.     

N‐(6‐Amino‐3‐methyl‐2,4‐dioxo‐1,2,3,4‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidin‐5‐yl)‐N‐(β‐d‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­acet­amide

The title compound, C₁₃H₂₀N₄O₈·2H₂O, i.e. (I)·2H₂O, shows no unusual features. The structure contains two mol­ecules of water of crystallization. The absolute configuration was not determined but was known from the starting materials.     

Methyl 2‐O‐β‐l‐fucopyranosyl α‐d‐glucopyranoside monohydrate: a synchrotron study

The structure of the title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₀·H₂O, is stabilized by hydrogen bonds situated adjacent to the glycoside linkage. A direct intramolecular hydrogen bond is present between the fucopyranosyl ring O atom and a glucopyranoside OH group, and a bridging water molecule mediates a hydrogen‐bond‐based interaction from a fucopyranosyl OH group to the methoxy O atom. The conformation of the disaccharide is described by the glycosidic torsion angles ϕ_H = −41° and ψ_H = −2°.     

3‐O‐Acetyl‐4‐deoxy‐4‐iodo‐β‐d‐fructo­furan­osyl 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐acetyl‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d‐gluco­pyran­oside

At 160 K, the gluco­pyran­osyl ring of the title compound, C₂₀H₂₈ClIO₁₃, has a near‐ideal ⁴C₁ conformation and the fructo­furan­osyl ring has a twist ⁴T₃ conformation. The two hydroxy groups are involved in intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen bonds, with the latter interactions linking the mol­ecules into infinite one‐dimensional chains. The absolute configuration of the mol­ecule has been determined.     

Conformational analysis of the disaccharide methyl α‐d‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐2‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐mannopyranoside monohydrate

The crystal structure of methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐2‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐mannopyranoside monohydrate, C₁₅H₂₆O₁₂·H₂O, ( II ), has been determined and the structural parameters for its constituent α‐d ‐mannopyranosyl residue compared with those for methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranoside. Mono‐O‐acetylation appears to promote the crystallization of ( II ), inferred from the difficulty in crystallizing methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐d ‐mannopyranoside despite repeated attempts. The conformational properties of the O‐acetyl side chain in ( II ) are similar to those observed in recent studies of peracetylated mannose‐containing oligosaccharides, having a preferred geometry in which the C2—H2 bond eclipses the C=O bond of the acetyl group. The C2—O2 bond in ( II ) elongates by ～0.02 Å upon O‐acetylation. The phi (?) and psi (ψ) torsion angles that dictate the conformation of the internal O‐glycosidic linkage in ( II ) are similar to those determined recently in aqueous solution by NMR spectroscopy for unacetylated ( II ) using the statistical program MA′AT, with a greater disparity found for ψ (Δ = ～16°) than for ? (Δ = ～6°).