4‐(4‐Fluoro‐3‐phenoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐fluoro­phen­yl)‐2‐oxo‐1,2‐dihydro­pyridine‐3‐carbonitrile and the 6‐(4‐methyl­phen­yl)‐ analogue

The crystal structures of the title compounds, viz. C₂₄H₁₄F₂N₂O₂, (I), and C₂₅H₁₇FN₂O₂, (II), respectively, have been determined in order to unravel the role of an ordered F atom in generating stable supra­molecular assemblies. On changing the substitution from fluorine to a methyl group, C—H⋯F inter­actions are replaced by C—H⋯π inter­actions, revealing the importance of such weak inter­actions when present alongside N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The dihedral angle between the planes of the 4‐fluoro­phenyl ring and the pyridine ring is 26.8 (1)° in (I), while that between the planes of the 4‐methyl­phenyl and pyridine rings is 29.5 (1)° in (II).     

Four (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐alkoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐trienes

The crystal structures of the four E,Z,E isomers of 1‐(4‐alk­oxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, namely (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐methoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₁₉H₁₇NO₃, (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐ethoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₂₀H₁₉NO₃, (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐n‐propoxyphen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₂₁H₂₁NO₃, and (E,Z,E)‐1‐(4‐n‐butoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐nitro­phen­yl)hexa‐1,3,5‐triene, C₂₂H₂₃NO₃, have been determined. Inter­molecular N⋯O dipole inter­actions between the nitro groups are observed for the meth­oxy derivative, while for the eth­oxy derivative, two adjacent mol­ecules are linked at both ends through N⋯O dipole–dipole inter­actions between the N atom of the nitro group and the O atom of the eth­oxy group to form a supra­molecular ring‐like structure. In the crystal structures of the n‐prop­oxy and n‐but­oxy derivatives, the shortest inter­molecular distances are those between the two O atoms of the alk­oxy groups. Thus, the nearest two mol­ecules form an S‐shaped supra­molecular dimer in these crystal structures.     

Bis(1‐methyl­guanidinium) tetra­chloro­cuprate(II) and 4‐(2‐pyrimidin‐1‐io)­piperazinium tetra­chloro­cuprate(II)

The crystal structures of the title compounds, (C₂N₃H₈)₂[CuCl₄], (I), and (C₈H₁₄N₄)[CuCl₄], (II), have been studied by X‐ray diffraction. The structures consist of discrete [CuCl₄]^2? anions with two monoprotonated (C₂N₃H₈)⁺ cations for (I) and a diprotonated (C₈N₄H₁₄)²⁺ cation for (II). The [CuCl₄]^2? anions of both compounds have flattened tetrahedral geometries. There are several N—H?Cl weak bonds that join the [CuCl₄]^2? anions and the organic cations helping retain the pseudo‐tetrahedral geometries of the anions.     

1,3‐Bis(2,4‐dibromophenyl)triazene

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₂H₇Br₄N₃, shows that the stereochemistry about the N=N double bond of the N=N—N(H) moiety is trans. The whole mol­ecule deviates slightly from planarity (r.m.s. deviation 0.164 Å). While one of the aryl substituents is almost coplanar with the triazene chain, weak intermolecular Br?C contacts cause the second aryl substituent to deviate by an angle of 9.1 (8)° from the plane defined by the N=N—N group. Weak intermolecular N—H?Br interactions between mol­ecules related by the diagonal glide plane give rise to chains, which are stacked along the [100] crystallographic direction. An unequal distribution of double‐bond character between the N atoms suggests a delocalization of π electrons over the diazo­amino group and the adjacent aryl groups.     

1,3‐Bis(4‐nitro­phenyl)­triazene

The structure of the title compound, C₁₂H₉N₅O₄, reveals an almost planar mol­ecule (r.m.s. deviation = 0.061 Å), in which the interplanar angle between the phenyl rings is 5.7 (1)° and the largest interplanar angle is that between the phenyl ring and the nitro group of one of the 4‐nitro­phenyl substituents [8.8 (3)°]. The observed mol­ecular conformation suggests a delocalization of π‐electrons extended over the diazo­amine group and the terminal aryl substituents. Intermolecular N—H⃛O interactions between the twofold screw‐related mol­ecules give rise to helical chains along the [010] direction. Intermolecular C—H⃛O interactions then generate sheets of mol­ecules in the (10) plane, and these sheets are held together by N⃛C and O⃛O π–π interactions.     

N‐[(R)‐1‐(2‐Hydr­oxy‐5‐methyl­phen­yl)­eth­yl]‐N‐[(R)‐1‐(2‐meth­oxy‐5‐methyl­phen­yl)‐2‐phenyl­eth­yl]aminium chloride

The title compound, C₂₅H₃₀NO₂⁺·Cl⁻, has been synthesized, and the crystal structure shows that it is mainly stabilized through inter­molecular N—H·Cl and O—H·Cl and intra­molecular N—H·O hydrogen bonds. The absolute configuration of the new stereogenic center (the C atom adjacent to the N atom on the phenol side) was determined to have an R configuration.     

4‐(4‐Chloro­phen­yl)‐3‐(4‐phenyl­pent‐4‐en­yloxy)‐1,3‐thia­zole‐2(3H)‐thione

The title compound, C₂₀H₁₈ClNOS₂, is a thia­zole‐derived thio­hydroxamic acid O‐ester. The value of Z′ is 3 and the asymmetric unit comprises three mol­ecules of identical helicity along the N—O bond. Two of these show an anti and the third a syn arrangement of substituents attached in positions 3 and 4 to the 1,3‐thia­zole nucleus.     

Methyl 1‐(4‐chloro­benzyl)‐2‐(4‐methyl­piperazin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐benz­imidazole‐5‐carboxyl­ate hemihydrate

The title compound, C₂₁H₂₃ClN₄O₂·0.5H₂O, contains two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. In each mol­ecule the piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation; the deviations of the piperazine N atoms from the best plane through the remaining four C atoms are ?0.678 (3) and 0.662 (3) Å in mol­ecule A, and 0.687 (3) and ?0.700 (3) Å in mol­ecule B. The mol­ecules are linked by two hydrogen bonds of the O—H?N type involving the O atom of the water mol­ecule of crystallization.     

1‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene

Two chemical isomers of 3‐nitro­benzotrifluoride, namely 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (I), and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (II), have been prepared and their crystal structures determined with the specific purpose of forming a cocrystal of the two. The two compounds display a similar conformation, with dihedral angles between the benzene rings of 83.1 (1) and 76.2 (1)°, respectively, but (I) packs in P while (II) packs in P2₁/c, with C—H⋯O interactions. No cocrystal could be formed, and it is suggested that the C—H⋯O associations in (II) prevent intermolecular mixing and promote phase separation.     

Bis(acesulfamato‐κ2O4,N)bis­(3‐methyl­pyridine)copper(II)

In the crystal structure of the title compound {systematic name: bis­[6‐methyl‐1,2,3‐oxa­thia­zin‐4(3H)‐one 2,2‐dioxide(1−)‐κ²N³,O⁴]bis­(3‐meth­yl­pyridine)copper(II)}, [Cu(C₄H₄NO₄S)₂(C₆H₇N)₂], the Cu^II centre resides on a centre of symmetry and has an octa­hedral geometry that is distorted both by the presence of four‐membered chelate rings and because of the Jahn–Teller effect. The equatorial plane is formed by the N atoms of two methyl­pyridine ligands and by the more basic O atoms of the acesulfamate ligands, while the weakly basic N atoms of these ligands are in elongated axial positions with a misdirected valence. The crystal is stabilized by two inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions involving the methyl and CH groups, and the sulfonyl O atoms of the acesulfamate group.     

3‐(4‐Acetyl­phenyl)‐1‐(4‐nitro­phenyl)­triazene

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₃, shows that the stereochemistry about the N=N double bond of the N=N—N(H) moiety is trans. The whole mol­ecule is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0654 Å), the interplanar angle between the phenyl rings being 0.7 (1)° and the largest interplanar angle being that between the phenyl ring and the nitro group of the 4‐nitro­phenyl substituent [11.5 (2)°]. Intermolecular N—H⋯O interactions between mol­ecules related by translation give rise to chains along the [110] and [10] directions, and these chains are held together by N⋯O π–π interactions. An unequal distribution of the double‐bond character among the N atoms suggests a delocalization of π electrons over the diazo­amine group and the adjacent aryl substituents.     

3‐(4‐Chloro­benzoyl)‐7‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)‐1‐phenyl­indolizine and 3‐(2,4‐di­chloro­benzoyl)‐7‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)‐1‐phenyl­indolizine

In both of the title compounds, C₂₃H₁₉ClN₂O, (I), and C₂₃H₁₈Cl₂N₂O, (II), the molecular packing is influenced by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions, but despite the chemical similarity of the compounds, the packing in (II) is entirely different from that observed in (I).     

N‐Meth­yl‐N‐(2‐nitro­phen­yl)nitramine and N‐meth­yl‐N‐(3‐nitro­phen­yl)­nitramine

The structures of the two title isomeric compounds (systematic names: N‐meth­yl‐N,2‐dinitro­aniline and N‐meth­yl‐N,3‐di­nitro­aniline, both C₇H₇N₃O₄) are slightly different because they exhibit different steric hindrances and hydrogen‐bonding environments. The aromatic rings are planar. The –N(Me)NO₂ and –NO₂ groups are not coplanar with the rings. Comparison of the geometric parameters of the ortho, meta and para isomers together with those of N‐meth­yl‐N‐phenyl­nitramine suggests that the position of the nitro group has a strong influence on the aromatic ring distortion. The crystal packing is stabilized by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to the nitramine group.     

Bis(2‐amino‐6‐methyl­pyridinium) tetra­chloro­zincate(II)

The title compound, (C₆H₉N₂)₂[Zn^IICl₄], consists of two 2‐amino‐6‐methyl­pyridinium (AMP) cations and one [ZnCl₄]²⁻ anion, which are held together by N—H·Cl hydrogen bonds. Bond lengths within the AMP cation indicate that the imine tautomer makes a significant contribution to the structure. The mol­ecules are associated by two different π–π interactions between identical antiparallel AMP cations, with face‐to‐face distances of 3.627 (4) and 3.342 (3) Å, to form a one‐dimensional chain.     

Tris(1‐ethyl‐3‐methyl­imidazolium) hexa­chloro­lanthanate

In the title complex, (C₆H₁₁N₂)₃[LaCl₆], centrosymmetric octahedral hexa­chloro­lanthanate anions are located at the corners and face‐centers of the monoclinic unit cell. The ring H atoms of the cations interact with the Cl atoms of the anions via hydrogen bonding, and bifurcation of the hydrogen bonding is observed. Cation–cation interactions via hydrogen bonding between the ring H atoms and π‐electrons of aromatic rings are also observed as in other imidazolium salts.     

Synthesis of 4‐(Isothiazol‐3‐yl)morpholines and 1‐(Isothiazol‐3‐yl)piperazines,and Their Inhibitory Activity towards Acetylcholinesterase

The synthesis of novel triaryl‐substituted 4‐(isothiazol‐3‐yl)morpholines 7 and 8 , and 1‐(isothiazol‐3‐yl)piperazines 9 – 13 by reaction of the corresponding isothiazolium salts 5 and 6 with secondary amines in the presence of t‐BuOK in absolute THF is described. Some representatives of the isothiazoles were evaluated as inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase from Electrophorus electricus.     

1,4‐Bis(triisopropyl­silyl)buta‐1,3‐diyne and 1,4‐bis­(biphenyl‐4‐yl)buta‐1,3‐diyne

We report the single crystal structures of 1,4‐bis­(triisopropyl­silyl)buta‐1,3‐diyne, C₂₂H₄₂Si₂, and 1,4‐bis­(biphenyl‐4‐yl)buta‐1,3‐diyne, C₂₈H₁₈, the packing in both of which illustrates the versatility of weak C—H⋯π supra­molecular inter­actions in dictating the overall solid‐state structures.     

Bis(acesulfamato‐κO4)diaqua­bis­(3‐methyl­pyridine‐κN)nickel(II)

In the crystal structure of the title compound [systematic name: diaqua­bis(6‐methyl‐2,2‐dioxo‐1,2,3‐oxathia­zin‐4‐olato‐κO⁴)bis­(3‐methyl­pyridine‐κN)nickel(II)], [Ni(C₄H₄NO₄S)₂(C₆H₇N)₂(H₂O)₂], the Ni^II centre resides on a centre of symmetry and has a distorted octa­hedral geometry. The basal plane is formed by two carbonyl O atoms of two monodentate trans‐oriented acesulfamate ligands and two trans aqua ligands. The axial positions in the octa­hedron are occupied by two N atoms of two trans pyridine ligands. Mol­ecules are stacked in columns running along the a axis. There are π–π stacking inter­actions between the mol­ecules in each column, with a distance of 3.623 (2) Å between the centroids of the pyridine rings. There are also O—H⋯O inter­actions between the columns.     

Bis(μ‐acetato)(μ‐2,6‐bis­{[(2‐hydroxy­ethyl)(2‐pyridylmeth­yl)amino]meth­yl}‐4‐methyl­phenolato)dinickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate hemihydrate

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Ni₂(C₂₅H₃₁N₄O₃)(C₂H₃O₂)₂]PF₆·0.5H₂O, consists of two dinuclear nickel cations, two hexa­fluoro­phosphate anions and one water mol­ecule of crystallization. Within each cation, the Ni atoms are bridged by two exogenous acetate groups and an endogenous cresol O atom of a phenolate‐based `end‐off' compartmental ligand that possesses two pendant chelating arms attached to the ortho positions of the phenol ring. Each Ni atom is six‐coordinate with a slightly distorted octa­hedral geometry. The two symmetry‐independent cations are linked into a dimeric unit through O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Additional O—H⋯O, C—H⋯F and C—H⋯O inter­molecular inter­actions link all of the units in the structure into a three‐dimensional framework.     

1‐(Thiophen‐3‐yl)ethanone

The structure of the title compound, C₆H₆OS, exhibits a flip‐type disorder of the thiophene ring [occupancy ratio = 0.848 (3):0.152 (3)], which is typical for many thiophene derivatives. The puckered thiophene ring is essentially coplanar with the plane formed by the non‐H atoms of the acetyl substituent, similar to its simple analogues, i.e. 3‐acetyl‐2‐carboxythiophene, 4‐acetyl‐3‐carboxythiophene and 3,5‐diacetyl‐2‐ethylamino‐4‐methylthiophene. In the crystal structure, molecules are connected by C—H...π hydrogen bonds, forming a sheet parallel to the (001) plane. Moreover, an inspection of the crystal lattice reveals that there are short S...O contacts connecting the molecules of adjacent sheets. Comparison of the title crystal structure with its simple 3‐methoxythiophene analogue shows a close similarity in the herringbone arrangement of molecules and in the presence of C—H...π interactions and S...O contacts.