7‐Chloro‐1‐(2,6‐di­fluoro­phenyl)‐1H,3H‐thia­zolo­[3,4‐a]­benz­imidazole and 1‐(2,6‐di­fluoro­phenyl)‐6‐methyl‐1H,3H‐thia­zolo­[3,4‐a]­benz­imidazole

The title mol­ecules, C₁₅H₉ClF₂N₂S and C₁₆H₁₂F₂N₂S, respectively, display the well known butterfly‐like conformation with a flat thia­zolobenz­imidazole system. In both compounds, the mean plane through the tricyclic system is almost perpendicular to the 2,6‐di­fluoro­phenyl ring. This arrangement of the aryl group is determined by two intramolecular hydrogen bonds and by an attractive F?S interaction.     

7‐Chloro‐3,6‐di­methyl‐1H‐indene‐2‐carb­aldehyde

In the crystal structure of C₁₂H₁₁ClO, the (planar) mol­ecules give rise to a parallel packing. A model crystal obtained by semi‐empirical and packing‐energy calculations is consistent with the observed structure.     

catena‐Poly­[[di­aqua­lithium(I)]‐μ‐[9H‐purine‐2,6(1H,3H)‐dionato‐O2:N7]]

In the title compound, [Li(C₅H₃N₄O₂)(H₂O)₂]_n, the coordinate geometry about the Li⁺ ion is distorted tetrahedral and the Li⁺ ion is bonded to N and O atoms of adjacent ligand mol­ecules forming an infinite polymeric chain with Li—O and Li—N bond lengths of 1.901 (5) and 2.043 (6) Å, respectively. Tetrahedral coordination at the Li⁺ ion is completed by two cis water mol­ecules [Li—O 1.985 (6) and 1.946 (6) Å]. The crystal structure is stabilized both by the polymeric structure and by a hydrogen‐bond network involving N—H?O, O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds.     

3‐(4‐Chloro­benzoyl)‐7‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)‐1‐phenyl­indolizine and 3‐(2,4‐di­chloro­benzoyl)‐7‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)‐1‐phenyl­indolizine

In both of the title compounds, C₂₃H₁₉ClN₂O, (I), and C₂₃H₁₈Cl₂N₂O, (II), the molecular packing is influenced by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions, but despite the chemical similarity of the compounds, the packing in (II) is entirely different from that observed in (I).     

1‐(2,5‐Di­chloro­phenyl)‐3‐methyl‐5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole

The title compound, C₁₆H₁₂Cl₂N₂, crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c. Two independent but chemically identical mol­ecules comprise the asymmetric unit and in each of these the pyrazole ring is planar.     

2‐Trichloromethylthio‐1H‐iso­indole‐1,3(2H)‐dione (Folpet)

The title compound (C₉H₄Cl₃NO₂S), commonly known as Folpet, belongs to a group of phthalimides which function as fungicides or can be used in the laboratory as sulfurizing agents. The phthalimide moiety is slightly folded with a dihedral angle of 3.5 (4)°. The molecule participates in C—H?O and Cl?Cl intermolecular interactions.     

1‐(1H‐Indol‐3‐ylcarbonyl)‐N‐(4‐methoxy­benzyl)formamide

In the title compound, C₁₈H₁₆N₂O₃, the indole ring is planar and the two adjacent carbonyl groups are mutually trans oriented with a torsion angle of 144.8 (3)°. The single C—C bond linking the two carbonyl functionalities is 1.539 (4) Å. Mol­ecules are linked into a two‐dimensional network by inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

Supramolecular structures of 5‐[3‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐ and 5‐[3‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐dioxane‐4,6‐dione

2,2‐Di­methyl‐5‐[3‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐1,3‐di­ox­ane‐4,6‐dione, C₁₆H₁₆O₄, crystallizes in the triclinic space group , with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. These mol­ecules and a centrosymmetrically related pair, linked together by weak C—H?O hydrogen bonds, form a tetramer. 5‐[3‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐dioxane‐4,6‐dione, C₁₅H₁₃ClO₄, also crystallizes in the triclinic space group , with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. Centrosymmetrically related mol­ecules are linked together by weak C—H?O hydrogen bonds to form dimers which are further linked by yet another pair of centrosymmetrically related C—H?O hydrogen bonds to form a tube which runs parallel to the a axis.     

Two diastereomers of 9‐(2,6‐di­chloro­phenyl)‐4a‐hydroxy‐3,3,6,6‐tetra­methyl‐1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,9a‐deca­hydro­xanthene‐1,8‐dione in the same crystal

The reaction of dimedone with 2,6‐di­chloro­benz­aldehyde leads to the title compound, C₂₃H₂₆Cl₂O₄. In principle, the reaction could yield eight different stereoisomers. We have found four of them in the same crystal as two enantiomeric pairs of diastereomers, which means that the asymmetric unit is built up of two different diastereomers. Two of the three chiral centres display the same configuration, while the third is different in the two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The packing of the mol­ecules is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between the hydroxy group and the carbonyl group attached to the cyclo­hexene ring, forming chains in which the different diastereomers alternate.     

Aqua­di­chloro­(di‐2‐pyridyl­di­azene)copper(II) monohydrate

The crystal structure of the mononuclear title complex, [CuCl₂(C₁₀H₈N₄)(H₂O)]·H₂O, shows an s‐cis/E/s‐trans‐configured di‐2‐pyridyl­diazene ligand, with the square‐pyramidal Cu^II ion coordinated to one pyridyl and one diazene N atom together with two Cl atoms and one aqua ligand. The crystal packing involves both hydrogen‐bonding and π–π interactions. The solvent water mol­ecule links three monomers to one another through hydrogen‐bonding interactions in which two monomers are linked via chloro ligands and the third via the aqua ligand. Face‐to‐face and weak slipped π–π interactions also occur between di‐2‐pyridyl­diazene moieties, and these interactions are responsible for the interchain packing.     

Chloro(1‐{3‐[2‐(di­phenyl­phos­phanyl‐κP)­ethyl]‐η6‐benzyl}‐3,5‐di­methyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN2)­ruthenium(II) tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate

To address the question of the role of chirality at the metal in enantioselective catalysis, a pseudo‐tetrahedral three‐legged piano‐stool complex has been prepared, i.e. [RuCl(C₂₆H₂₇N₂P)](CF₃SO₃). Anchoring a phosphine and a pyrazole tether to an arene (PArN) yields, after η⁶:η¹:η¹ coordination to ruthenium, [{η⁶:η¹:η¹‐(PArN)}RuCl]⁺ as a 1:1 mixture of enantiomers. Unfortunately, all attempts to resolve the enantiomers failed. The structure solution revealed the presence of racemic crystals.     

Syntheses of N‐[3‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐2‐imidazolyl)propyl]benzamides and N‐[3‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐2‐imidazolyl)propyl]benzenesulfonamides

A series of substituted N‐(4‐substituted‐benzoyl)‐N‐[3‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)propyl]amines ( 13 ) and N‐arylsulfonyl‐N‐[3‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)propyl]amines ( 14 ) were prepared from the reaction of 3‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)propan‐1‐amine ( 7 ) with substituted benzoyl chloride or substituted‐benzene sulfonyl chloride respectively. Compound 7 was prepared by two independent methods.     

Tetraaquabis(2,6‐diamine‐7H‐purine‐κN9)cobalt(II) benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate tetrahydrate

The title compound, [Co(C₅H₇N₆)₂(H₂O)₄](C₁₀H₂O₈)·4H₂O, is an ionic structure comprising a [Co(Hdap)₂(H₂O)₄]⁴⁺ cation (dap is 2,6‐diaminopurine) in a general position, two benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate (btc⁴⁻) anions straddling two different inversion centres and four solvent water molecules. The structure presents a remarkable degree of pseudosymmetry, with the Co^II cation lying almost exactly on a noncrystallographic pseudo‐inversion centre. The overall spatial arrangement can be described in terms of cationic and anionic chains running along the [111] direction and linked into a three‐dimensional network by a very complex hydrogen‐bonding scheme in which all the available N—H and O—H groups take part.     

(Z)‐7‐Chloro‐3‐[(3‐chloro­phenyl)­methyl­idene]‐4‐p‐tosyl‐3,4‐di­hydro‐2H‐1,4‐benzoxazine

In the title compound, C₂₂H₁₇Cl₂NO₃S, the mol­ecule is a substituted 3,4‐di­hydro‐2H‐1,4‐benzoxazine compound which has three phenyl rings which are essentially planar. The 3,4‐di­hydro‐2H‐oxazine part of the mol­ecule is fused to the benzo ring and has a half‐boat conformation; the dihedral angle between the planar part of the oxazine ring and the benzo ring is 10.2 (2)°. The (3‐chloro­phenyl)­methyl­idene substituent has a Z configuration in relation to the ring N atom of the oxazine moiety. Interestingly, the p‐toluenesulfonyl (p‐tosyl) substituent on the ring N atom protrudes away from the 3‐­chloro­phenyl substituent thus avoiding any steric interaction.     

Aqua(2,2′‐bi‐1H‐imidazole)chloro­copper(II) chloro­(imino­diacetato)copper(II) monohydrate

In the title compound, [CuCl(C₆H₆N₄)(H₂O)][Cu(C₄H₅NO₄)Cl]·H₂O, the Cu^II atom in the cation is coordinated by one Cl⁻ ion, two N atoms of the 2,2′‐biimidazole ligand and one aqua ligand. Within the anion, the Cu^II atom is bonded to one Cl⁻ ion, and one N and two O atoms of the imino­diacetate ligand. Neighbouring cations and anions are connected to each other by Cu·Cl semi‐coordination bonds of 2.830 (12) and 3.071 (12) Å, forming a Cu₂Cl₂ rectangular unit. The dinuclear units further link into a polymeric chain along the a axis through Cu·O_aqua interactions of 2.725 (3) Å. Including the long coordination bonds, the geometries around the Cu atoms in the cation and anion are square‐pyramidal and distorted octahedral, respectively.     

All Solid State Chromium(III) Selective Potentiometric Sensor Based on 2‐(1‐(2‐((3‐(2‐Hydroxyphenyl)‐1H‐pyrozol‐1‐yl)methyl)benzyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)phenol

Highly selective all solid state electrochemical sensor based on a synthesized compound i.e. 2‐(1‐(2‐((3‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐1H‐pyrozol‐1‐yl)methyl)benzyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)phenol (I) as an ionophore has been prepared and investigated for the selective quantification of chromium(III) ions. The effect of various plasticizers, viz. dibutyl phosphonate (DBP), dibutyl(butyl) phosphonate (DBBP), nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE), tris‐(2‐ethylhexyl)phosphonate (TEP), tri‐butyl phosphonate (TBP), dioctyl phthalate (DOP), dioctyl sebacate (DOS), benzyl acetate (BA) and acetophenone (AP) along with anion excluders NaTPB (sodium tetraphenyl borate) and KClTPB (potassium(tetrakis‐4‐chlorophenyl)borate was also studied. The optimum composition of the best performing membrane contained (I):KClTPB:NPOE:PVC in the ratio 15 : 3 : 40 : 42 w/w. The sensor exhibited near Nernstian slope of 20.1±0.2 mV/decade of activity in the working concentration range of 1.2×10^?7–1.0×10^?1 M, and in a pH range of 3.8–4.5. The sensor exhibited a fast response time of 10 s and could be used for about 5 months without any considerable divergence in potentials. The proposed sensor showed very good selectivity over most of the common cations including Na⁺, Li⁺, K⁺, Cu²⁺, Sr²⁺, Ni²⁺, Co²⁺, Ba²⁺, Hg²⁺, Pb²⁺, Zn²⁺, Cs⁺, Mg²⁺, Cd²⁺, Al³⁺, Fe³⁺and La³⁺. The activity of Cr(III) ions was successfully determined in the industrial waste samples by using this sensor.     

Determination of ligand efficiency indices in a group of 7H‐purine‐2,6‐dione derivatives with psychotropic activity using micellar electrokinetic chromatography

Discovering hit compounds and optimization processes in medicinal chemistry nowadays could be improved by predictive tools, based on the relationship between structure of molecules and lipophilic properties. Lipophilicity of drug candidate can affect both the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties, in particular, the ability of a molecule to cross the cell membrane. Among the new methods for determination of the lipophilicity of compounds, micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) is considered to be an appropriate one for bioactive molecules, as it closely mimics the physiological conditions. In this paper MEKC was used for the estimation of the lipophilicity of 24 derivatives of 8‐alkoxy‐7H‐purine‐2,6‐dione, designed and synthesized as potential antidepressant/anxiolytic and antipsychotic agents. The results of experimental method were compared with calculated in silico parameters (AlogPs and milogP by Virtual Computational Laboratory website, log P_Pallas by Pallas 3.1, Mlog P by Marvin, log P_ChemS by ChemSketch, log P_ChemDraw by ChemBioUltra) using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method. Finally, using estimated log P values for selected compounds ligand – lipophilicity efficiency (LLE), per cent efficiency index (PEI), and binding efficiency index (BEI) parameters were calculated. Applied MEKC procedure could be used for selection of potential lead structure in a group of 7H‐purine‐2,6‐dione derivatives.     

Methyl 1‐(4‐chloro­benzyl)‐2‐(4‐methyl­piperazin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐benz­imidazole‐5‐carboxyl­ate hemihydrate

The title compound, C₂₁H₂₃ClN₄O₂·0.5H₂O, contains two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. In each mol­ecule the piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation; the deviations of the piperazine N atoms from the best plane through the remaining four C atoms are ?0.678 (3) and 0.662 (3) Å in mol­ecule A, and 0.687 (3) and ?0.700 (3) Å in mol­ecule B. The mol­ecules are linked by two hydrogen bonds of the O—H?N type involving the O atom of the water mol­ecule of crystallization.     

Diethyl 1‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)‐3‐(2‐furyl)‐5‐oxopyrrolidine‐2,2‐di­carboxyl­ate and diethyl 1‐(3,4‐di­chloro­phenyl)‐3‐(2‐furyl)‐5‐oxopyrrolidine‐2,2‐di­carboxyl­ate

The title compounds, C₂₀H₂₀FNO₆ and C₂₀H₁₉Cl₂NO₆, respectively, may exhibit bioactivity. In these compounds, the pyrrolidine ring adopts a conformation intermediate between envelope and half‐chair. Only one of the two ethoxy­carbonyl side chains is nearly planar. Centrosymmetric pairs are formed, and the crystal structure is stabilized by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions.     

Diethyl 4‐(2,5‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐2,6‐di­methyl‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate,conformational change with solvent of crystallization

The title compound, C₂₁H₂₇NO₆, has been crystallized from ethanol containing nitro­benzene and shows the phenyl ring, B, in an ap conformation. This structure may be compared with that of the mol­ecule crystallized from ethanol alone, in which the B ring is seen in an sp conformation. The isolation of this rotamer has implications for the understanding of the docking of calcium beta‐blocking di­hydro­pyridine mol­ecules with their receptor site.