Dynamics of Two-Photon Lasers with

[1]C.O.Weiss and R.Vilaseca,Dynamics of Lasers,VCH,Weinheim (1991); Instabilities and Chaos in Quantum Optics,eds.F.T.Arecchi and R.G.Harrison,Springer-Verlag,Berlin (1987). [2]H.Haken,Phys.Lett.A 53 (1975) 77. [3]Ju Rui,Huang Hong-Bin,Yang Peng,Xie Xia,and Zhao Huan,Commun.Theor.Phys.(Beijing,China) 44 (2005) 65; Ju Rui,Zhang Ya-Jun,Huang Hong-Bin,and Zhao Huan,Acta Phys.Sin.53 (2004) 2191 (in Chinese). [4]C.Z.Ning and H.Haken,Z.Phys.B 77 (1989) 247; B 77 (1989) 157; B 77 (1989) 163; J.Zakrenwski and M.Lewenstein,Phys.Rev.A 45 (1992) 2057. [5]G.J.deValearcel,E.Roldan,and R.Vilaseca,Phys.Rev.A 45 (1992) R2674; Phys.Rev.A 49 (1994) 1243. [6]X.Xie,H.B.Huang,F.Qian,Y.J.Zhang,P.Yang,and G.X.Qi,Commun.Theor.Phys.(Beijing,China) 46 (2006) 1042. [7]X.L.Deng,H.Q.Ma,B.D.Chen,and H.B.Huang,Phys.Lett.A 290 (2001) 77. [8]C.Benkert,and M.O.Scully,Phys.Rev.A 42 (1990) 2817. [9]M.O.Scully and M.S.Zubairy,Quantum Optics,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge (1997).     

A revised controlled deterministic secure quantum communication with five-photon entangled state

A revised controlled deterministic secure quantum communication protocol using five-photon entangled state is proposed. It amends the security loopholes pointed by Qin et al. in [S.J. Qin, Q.Y. Wen, L.M. Meng, F.C. Zhu, Opt. Commun. 282 (2009) 2656] in the original protocol proposed by Xiu et al. in [X.M. Xiu, L. Dong, Y.J. Gao, F. Chi, Opt. Commun. 282 (2009) 333]. The security loopholes are solved by using order rearrangement of transmission photons and two-step security test.     

Simple Collaboration Eavesdropping on the Improved Multiparty Quantum Secret Sharing Protocol

We propose a new attack strategy for the improvement n-party (n≥4) case [S. Lin, F. Gao, Q.Y. Wen, F.C. Zhu in Opt. Commun. 281:4553, 2008] of the multiparty quantum secret sharing protocol [Z.J. Zhang, G. Gao, X. Wang, L.F. Han, S.H. Shi in Opt. Commun. 269:418, 2007]. Our attack strategy is an interesting collaboration eavesdropping and much simpler than that in the paper [T.Y. Wang, Q.Y. Wen, F. Gao, S. Lin, F.C. Zhu in Phys. Lett. A 373:65, 2008].     

Study of Strange Quark Mass in CFL Phase

[1]M.Alford,K.Rajagopal,and F.Wilczek,Phys.Lett.B 422 (1998) 247; Nucl.Phys.B 537 (1999) 443. [2]M.Gyulassy and L.McLerran,arXiv:nucl-th/0405013;E.V.Shuryak,arXiv:hep-ph/0405066. [3]K.Rajagopal and F.Wilczek,hep-ph/0011333. [4]M.Alford,Chris Kouvaris,and K.Rajagopal,hepph/0406137. [5]Y.Nambu and G.Jona-Lasinio,Phys.Rev.122 (1961)345. [6]R.T.Cahill and C.D.Roberts,Phys.Rev.D 32 (1985)2419. [7]R.T.Cahill and Susan M.Ganner,hep-ph/9812491. [8]A.W.Steiner,S.Reddy,and M.Prakash,Phys.Rev.D 66 (2002) 094007. [9]P.Amore,M.C.Birse,J.A.McGovern,and N.R.Walet,Phys.Rev.D 65 (2002) 074005. [10]M.Alford and K.Rajagopal,JHEP 0206 (2002) 031. [11]Xiao-Fu Li,Yu-Xin Liu,Hong-Shi Zong,and En-GuangZhao,Phys.Rev.C 58 (1998) 1195. [12]H.Reinhardt,Phys.Lett.B 244 (1990) 2. [13]Steven Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields,Vol.2,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge (1996) p.348.     

Top Quark Flavor Changing Decay t

[1]R. Casalbuoani, A. Deandrea, and M. Oertel, JHEP 032(2004) 0402. [2]G. Hooft, In Search of the Ultimate Building Blocks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). [3]J. Belazey, Searches for New Physics at Hadron Coliders,Northern Illinois University (2005). [4]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett.B 513 (2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239]. [5]I. Low, W. Skiba, and D. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002)072001 [hep-ph/0207243]. [6]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz, and A.E. Nelson,JHEP 0207 (2002) 304 [hep-ph/0206021]. [7]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz, A.E. Nelson, T.Gregoire, and J. G. Wacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 021 [hepph/0206020]. [8]T. Gregoire and J.G. Wacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 019[hep-ph/0206023]. [9]For a recent review, see e.g., M. Schmaltz, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 117 (2003) 40. [10]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, T. Gregoire, and J.G.Jacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 020 [hep-ph/0202089]. [11]or a recent review, see e.g., M. Schmaltz, Nucl. Phys.Proc. Suppl. 117 (2003) 40 [hep-ph/0210415]. [12]E. Katz, J. Lee, A.E. Nelson, and D.G. Walker, hepph/0312287. [13]M. Beneke, I. Efthymiopoulos, M.L. Mangano, et al., hepph/0003033. [14]D.O. Carlson and C.-P. Yuan, hep-ph/9211289. [15]R. Frey, D. Gerdes, and J. Jaros, hep-ph/9704243. [16]G. Eilam, J.L. Hewett, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 44(1991) 1473; W.S. Hou, Phys. Lett. B 296 (1992) 179; K.Agashe and M. Graesser, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 4445;M. Hosch, K. Whisnant, and B.L. Young, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 5725. [17]C.S. Li, R.J. Oakes, and J.M. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 49(1994) 293, Erratum-ibid. D 56 (1997) 3156; G. Couture,C. Hamzaoui, and H. Koenig, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995)1713; G. Couture, M. Frank, and H. Koenig, Phys. Rev.D 56 (1997) 4213; G.M. de Divitiis, et al., Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 45. [18]B. Mele, S. Petrarca, and A. Soddu, Phys. Lett. B 435(1998) 401. [19]B. Mele, hep-ph/0003064. [20]J.M. Yang and C.S. Li, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3412,Erratum, ibid. D 51 (1995) 3974; J.G. Inglada, hepph/9906517. [21]L.R. Xing, W.G. Ma, R.Y. Zhang, Y.B. Sun, and H.S.Hou, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 41 (2004)241. [22]L.R. Xing, W.G. Ma, R.Y. Zhang, Y.B. Sun, and H.S.Hou, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 40 (2003)171. [23]T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath, and L.T. Wang, Phys.Rev. D 67 (2003) 095004. [24]I. Low, W. Skiba, and D. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002)072001. [25]T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath, and L.T. Wang, hepph/0302188. [26]A.J. Buras, A. Poschenrieder, and S. Uhlig, hepph/0410309. [27]S. Eidelman, et al., Phys. Lett. B 592 (2004) 1. [28]F. Legerlehner, DESY 01-029, hep-ph/0105283.     

Information leakage in three-party simultaneous quantum secure direct communication with EPR pairs

In 2007, Wang et al. [M. Y. Wang and F. L. Yan, Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007) 2486] proposed a three-party simultaneous quantum secure direct communication (3P-SQSDC) scheme with EPR pairs. Recently, Chong et al. [S. K. Chong and T. Hwang, Opt. Commun. OPTICS-15438 (2010(online))] proposed an enhancement on Wang et al.'s scheme. The communications in Chong et al.'s 3P-SQSDC can be paralleled and thus their scheme has higher efficiency. However, we find that both of the schemes have the information leakage, because the legitimate parties' secret messages have a strong correlation. This kind of security loophole leads to the consequence that any eavesdropper (Eve) can directly conjecture some information about the secrets without any active attack.     

Soliton-like solutions of certain types of nonlinear diffusion-reaction equations with variable coefficient

With a view to exploring new soliton-like solutions of certain types of nonlinear diffusion-reaction (DR) equations with a variable coefficient, we demonstrate the viability of a method which is the combination of both the symbolic computation technique of Gao and Tian [Y.T. Gao, B. Tian, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133 (2001) 158] and auxiliary equation method of Sirendaoreji [Sirendaoreji, Phys. Lett. A 356 (2006) 124] and used recently for the KdV equation. In particular, the DR equations with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities with a time-dependent velocity in the convective flux term are studied and the existence of soliton-like solutions is shown.     

Comment on “Multiparty secret sharing of quantum information via cavity QED”

In a recent paper [Z.J. Zhang, Opt. Commun. 261 (2006) 199], a scheme on secret sharing of quantum information in cavity QED has been discussed. The author claims that he has improved the success probability of teleportation from 6.25% in our original paper [Y.Q. Zhang, X.R. Jin, S. Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 341 (2005) 380] to 100%. However, in this comment, we show that it is not the case and the author has mistakenly understood our original paper [Y.Q. Zhang, X.R. Jin, S. Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 341 (2005) 380].     

Re-study of Nucleon Pole Contribution in J/

[1]V.D.Burkert,Phys.Lett.B 72 (1997) 109. [2]S.Capstick and W.Roberts,Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.45 (2000) S241,and references therein. [3]B.S.Zou,Nucl.Phys.A 675 (2000) 167c; B.S.Zou,Nucl.Phys.A 684 (2001) 330; BES Collaboration (J.Z.Bai,et al.) Phys.Lett.B 510 (2001) 75; BES Collaboration (M.Ablikim,et al.),hep-ex/0405030. [4]R.Sinha and Susumu Okubo,Phys.Rev.D 30 (1984)2333. [5]W.H.Liang,P.N.Shen,B.S.Zou,and A.Faessler,Euro.Phys.J A 21 (2004) 487. [6]Particle Data Group,Euro.Phys.J.C 15 (2000) 1. [7]K.Tsushima,A.Sibrtsev,and A.W.Thomas,Phys.Lett.B 390 (1997) 29. [8]J.Kogut,Rev.Mod.Phys.51 (1979) 659; Rev.Mod.Phys.55 (1983) 775. [9]Q.Haider and L.C.Liu,J.Phys.G 22 (1996) 1187; L.C.Liu and W.X.Ma,J.Phys.G 26 (2000) L59. [10]V.G.J.Stoks,R.A.M.Klomp,C.P.F.Terheggen,and J.J.de Swart,Phys.Rev.C 49 (1994) 2950. [11]H.Haberzettl,C.Bennhold,T.Mart,and T.Feuster,Phys.Rev.C 58 (1998) R40. [12]Y.Oh,A.I.Titov,and T.-S.H.Lee,Phys.Rev.C 63(2001) 25201.     

Some Similarity Reduction Solutions to Two-Dimensional Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equation

We investigate the symmetry reduction for the two-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equation in conventional stream function form through Lie symmetry method and construct some similarity reduction solutions. Two special cases in [D.K. Ludlow, P.A. Clarkson, and A.P. Bassom, Stud. Appl. Math. 103 (1999) 183] and a theorem in [S.Y. Lou, M. Jia, X.Y. Tang, and F. Huang, Phys. Rev. E 75 (2007) 056318] are retrieved.     

Comment on “The Imbert-Fedorov shift of paraxial light beams”

Here I argue that Liu and Li [B.-Y. Liu, C.-F. Li, Opt. Commun. 281 (2008) 3427] reproduce calculations of the Imbert-Fedorov transverse shift previously made in a number of other works. However, it has recently been shown that these results are not valid for standard uniformly polarized beams. The corrected values of the Imbert-Fedorov shift were derived in papers [K.Y. Bliokh, Y.P. Bliokh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 073903; Phys. Rev. E 75 (2007) 066609] and confirmed by recent measurements [O. Hosten, P. Kwiat, Science 319 (2008) 787] with a great accuracy.     

Pair-Breaking Critical Current Density of Two-Band Superconductor MgB2

[1]J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagava, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani,and J. Akimitsu, Nature 410 (2001) 63. [2]C. Buzea and T. Yamashita, Supercond. Sci. Techn. 14(2001) R115. [3]S. Budko, G. Lapertot, C. Petrovic, C.E. Gunningham, N.Anderson, and P.C. Canfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001)1877. [4]H. Kotegawa, K. Ishida, Y. Kitaoka, T. Muranaka, and J. Akimitsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 127001. [5]J. Kortus, I.I. Mazin, K.D. Belashchenko, V.P. Antropov,and L.L. Boyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 4656. [6]A. Liu, I.I. Mazin, and J. Kortus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(2001) 087005. [7]X.K. Chen, M.J. Konstantinovich, J.C. Irwin, D.D.Lawrie, and J.P. Frank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001)157002. [8]H. Giublio, D. Roditchev, W. Sacks, R. Lamy, D.X.Thanh, J. Kleins, S. Miraglia, D. Fruchart, J. Markus,and P. Monod, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 177008. [9]F. Bouquet, R.A. Fisher, N.E. Phillips, D.G. Hinks, and J.D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 04700. [10]S.V. Shulga, S.-L. Drechsler, H. Echrig, H. Rosner, and W. Pickett, Cond-mat/0103154 (2001). [11]A.A. Golubov, J. Kortus, O.V. Dolgov, O. Jepsen, Y.Kong, O.K. Andersen, B.J. Gibson, K. Ahn, and R.K.Kremer, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 (2002) 1353. [12]H. Doh, M. Sigrist, B.K. Chao, and Sung-Ik Lee, Phys.Rev. Lett. 85 (1999) 5350. [13]I.N. Askerzade, N. Guclu, and A. Gencer, Supercond. Sci.Techn. 15 (2002) L13. [14]I.N. Askerzade, N. Guclu, A. Gencer, and A. Kiliq, Supercond. Sci. Techn. 15 (2002) L17. [15]I.N. Askerzade and A. Gencer, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71(2002) 1637. [16]I.N. Askerzade, Physica C 397 (2003) 99. [17]V.V. Anshukova, B.M. Bulychev, A.I. Golovashkin, L.I.Ivanova, A.A. Minakov, and A.P. Rusakov, Phys. Solid State 45 (2003) 1207. [18]A.A. Abrikosov, Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals,North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988). [19]M.N. Kunchur, S.I. Lee, and W.N. Kang, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 064516.     

Symmetry Analysis of Barotropic Potential Vorticity Equation

Recently F. Huang [Commun. Theor. Phys. 42 (2004) 903] and X. Tang and P.K. Shukla [Commun. Theor. Phys. 49 (2008) 229] investigated symmetry properties of the barotropic potential vorticity equation without forcing anddissipation on the beta-plane. This equation is governed by two dimensionless parameters, F and β, representing the ratio of the characteristic length scale to the Rossby radius of deformation and the variation of earth' angular rotation, respectively. In the present paper it is shown that in the case F≠ 0 there exists a well-defined point transformation to set β= 0. Theclassification of one- and two-dimensional Lie subalgebras of the Lie symmetry algebra of the potential vorticity equation is given for the parameter combination F≠0 and β = 0. Based upon this classification, distinct classes of group-invariant solutions are obtained and extended to the case β≠ 0.     

The global version of the gyrokinetic turbulence code GENE

The understanding and prediction of transport due to plasma microturbulence is a key open problem in modern plasma physics, and a grand challenge for fusion energy research. Ab initio simulations of such small-scale, low-frequency turbulence are to be based on the gyrokinetic equations, a set of nonlinear integro-differential equations in reduced (five-dimensional) phase space. In the present paper, the extension of the well-established and widely used gyrokinetic code GENE [F. Jenko, W. Dorland, M. Kotschenreuther, B.N. Rogers, Electron temperature gradient driven turbulence, Phys. Plasmas 7 (2000) 1904–1910] from a radially local to a radially global (nonlocal) version is described. The necessary modifications of both the basic equations and the employed numerical methods are detailed, including, e.g., the change from spectral methods to finite difference and interpolation techniques in the radial direction and the implementation of sources and sinks. In addition, code verification studies and benchmarks are presented.     

Exact analytical solution of a nonlinear equation arising in heat transfer

This Letter shows that the nonlinear equation arising in heat transfer recently investigated in papers [D.D. Ganji, Phys. Lett. A 355 (2006) 337; S. Abbasbandy, Phys. Lett. A 360 (2006) 109; Hafez Tari, D.D. Ganji, H. Babazadeh, Phys. Lett. A 363 (2007) 213] and [M.S.H. Chowdhury, I. Hashim, Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 1240] is exactly solvable, analyses the equation fully and, furthermore, gives analytic exact solution in implicit form for each value of parameters of equation.     

Surrogate analysis of volatility series from long-range correlated noise

Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) [C.-K. Peng, S.V. Buldyrev, A.L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, F. Sciortino, M. Simons, H.E. Stanley, Nature 356 (1992) 168] of volatility series has been proposed to identify possible nonlinear/multifractal signatures in the given empirical sample [Y. Ashkenazy, P.Ch. Ivanov, S. Havlin, C.-K. Peng, A.L. Goldberger, H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 1900; Y. Ashkenazy, S. Havlin, P. Ch. Ivanov, C.-K. Peng, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, H.E. Stanley, Physica A. 323 (2003) 19; T. Kalisky, Y. Ashkenazy, S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. E 72 (2005) 011913]. Long-range volatility correlation can be an outcome of static as well as dynamical nonlinearity. In order to argue in favor of dynamical nonlinearity, surrogate testing is used in conjunction with volatility analysis [Y. Ashkenazy, P.Ch. Ivanov, S. Havlin, C.-K. Peng, A.L. Goldberger, H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 1900; Y. Ashkenazy, S. Havlin, P. Ch. Ivanov, C.-K. Peng, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, H.E. Stanley, Physica A. 323 (2003) 19; T. Kalisky, Y. Ashkenazy, S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. E 72 (2005) 011913]. In this brief communication, surrogate testing of volatility series from long-range correlated monofractal noise and their static, invertible nonlinear transforms is investigated. Long-range correlated noise is generated from fractional auto regressive integrated moving average (FARIMA) (0, d, 0), with Gaussian and non-Gaussian innovations. We show significant deviation in the scaling behavior between the empirical sample and the surrogate counterpart at large time-scales in the case of FARIMA (0, d, 0) with non-Gaussian innovations whereas no such discrepancy was observed in the case of Gaussian innovations. The results encourage cautious interpretation of surrogate analysis of volatility series in the presence of non-Gaussian innovations.     

Compact finite volume schemes on boundary-fitted grids

The paper focuses on the development of a framework for high-order compact finite volume discretization of the three-dimensional scalar advection–diffusion equation. In order to deal with irregular domains, a coordinate transformation is applied between a curvilinear, non-orthogonal grid in the physical space and the computational space. Advective fluxes are computed by the fifth-order upwind scheme introduced by Pirozzoli [S. Pirozzoli, Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock–turbulence interaction, J. Comp. Phys. 178 (2002) 81] while the Coupled Derivative scheme [M.H. Kobayashi, On a class of Padé finite volume methods, J. Comp. Phys. 156 (1999) 137] is used for the discretization of the diffusive fluxes.Numerical tests include unsteady diffusion over a distorted grid, linear free-surface gravity waves in a irregular domain and the advection of a scalar field. The proposed methodology attains high-order formal accuracy and shows very favorable resolution characteristics for the simulation of problems with a wide range of length scales.     

Calculations of two-fluid magnetohydrodynamic axisymmetric steady-states

M3D-C¹$C^1$ is an implicit, high-order finite element code for the solution of the time-dependent nonlinear two-fluid magnetohydrodynamic equations [S.C. Jardin, J. Breslau, N. Ferraro, A high-order implicit finite element method for integrating the two-fluid magnetohydrodynamic equations in two dimensions, J. Comp. Phys. 226 (2) (2007) 2146–2174]. This code has now been extended to allow computations in toroidal geometry. Improvements to the spatial integration and time-stepping algorithms are discussed. Steady-states of a resistive two-fluid model, self-consistently including flows, anisotropic viscosity (including gyroviscosity) and heat flux, are calculated for diverted plasmas in geometries typical of the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) [M. Ono et al., Exploration of spherical torus physics in the NSTX device, Nucl. Fusion 40 (3Y) (2000) 557–561]. These states are found by time-integrating the dynamical equations until the steady-state is reached, and are therefore stationary or statistically steady on both magnetohydrodynamic and transport time-scales. Resistively driven cross-surface flows are found to be in close agreement with Pfirsch-Schlüter theory. Poloidally varying toroidal flows are in agreement with comparable calculations [A.Y. Aydemir, Shear flows at the tokamak edge and their interaction with edge-localized modes, Phys. Plasmas 14]. New effects on core toroidal rotation due to gyroviscosity and a local particle source are observed.     

Angular Distributions for

[1]G.T.Bodwin,E.Braaten,and G.P.Lepage,Phys.Rev.D 51 (1995) 1125;[Erratum-ibid.D 55 (1997) 5853][arXiv:hep-ph/9407339]; J.Boltz,P.Kroll,and G.A.Schulre,Phys.Lett.B 392 (1997) 198; J.Boltz,P.Kroll,and G.A.Schulre,Phys.J.C 2 (1998) 705. [2]S.M.Wong,Nucl.Phys.A 674 (2000) 185; S.M.Wong,Eur.Phys.J.C 14 (2000) 643. [3]J.Z.Bai,Y.Ban,J.G.Bian,et al.,Phys.Rev.D 67 (2003)112001. [4]M.Jacob and G.C.Wick,Ann.Phys.7 (1959) 404. [5]S.U.Chung,Phys.Rev.D 48 (1993) 1225; S.U.Chung,Phys.Rev.D 57 (1998) 431; B.S.Zou and D.V.Bugg,Eur.Phys.J.A 16 (2003) 537. [6]Particle Data Group,Phys.Lett.B 592 (2004) pp.924-966. [7]M.A.Doncheski,et al.,Phys.Rev.D 42 (1990) 2293; E.Eichten,et al.,Phys.Rev.D 21 (1980) 203; K.J.Sebastian,Phys.Rev.D 26 (1982) 2295; G.Hardekopf and J.Sucher,Phys.Rev.D 25 (1982) 2938; R.McClary and N.Byers,Phys.Rev.D 28 (1983) 1692; P.Moxhay and J.L.Rosner,Phys.Rev.D 28 (1983) 1132. [8]B.S.Zou and F.Hussain,Phys.Rev.C 67 (2003) 015204.     

Shape Coexistence for 179Hg in Relativistic Mean-Field Theory

[1]J.H. Hamilton,A. VRamayya, W.T. Pinkston, et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 239. [2]R. Julin, K. Helariutta, and M. Muikku, J. Phys. G 27(2001) R109. [3]J.H. Hamilton, Nukleonika 24 (1979) 561. [4]W.C. Ma, et al., Phys. Lett. B 139 (1984) 276. [5]R. Bengtsson, et al., Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987) 1. [6]S. Yoshida and N. Takigawa, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1996)1255. [7]T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, et al., Phys. Rev. C 65(2002) 054320. [8]F.G. Condev, M.P. Carpenter, R.V.F. Janssens, et al.,Phys. Lett. B 528 (2002) 221. [9]D.G. Jenkins, A.N. Andreyev, R.D. Page, et al., Phys.Rev. C 66 (2002) 011301(R). [10]B.D. Serot and J.D. Walecka, Adv. Nuc]. Phys. 16 (1986)1. [11]P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 (1996) 193. [12]J. Meng and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3963. [13]J. Meng and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 460. [14]S.K. Patra, S. Yoshida, N. Takigawa, and C.R. Praharaj,Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) 1924. [15]S. Yoshida, S.K. Patra, N. Takigawa, and C.R. Praharaj,Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) 1938. [16]G.A. Lalazissis and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998)225. [17]Jun-Qing Li, Zhong-Yu Ma, Bao-Qiu Chen, and Yong Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 064305. [18]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 565 (1993) 1. [19]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 595 (1995)409. [20]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 624 (1997) 1. [21]P. MOller and J.R. Nix, Atom. Data and Nucl. Data Table 59 (1995) 307.