Youden analysis of Karl Fischer titration data from an interlaboratory study determining water in animal feed, grain, and forage

Data from a recent interlaboratory study of the determination of water (moisture) in animal feed, grain, and forage (plant tissue) by Karl Fischer titration were re-analyzed using Youden plots. The purpose was to show the unique ability these plots possess of separating random and systematic errors visually while providing numerical estimates of the precision and the systematic error of the method. Furthermore, the usefulness of the technique is underscored because AOAC INTERNATIONAL allows the use of matched pairs in collaborative studies to obtain estimates of repeatability and reproducibility.     

An interlaboratory study of potassium determination in rocks and minerals

Seven laboratories took part in this interlaboratory study which was part of an investigation of the flame-speetrometric determination of potassium in rocks and minerals suitable for potassium-argon age-measurement. Three of these laboratories determined potassium in the following five international reference rocks: tonalite T-1, basalt BCR-1, andesite AGV-1, granite G-2, and granodiorite GSP-1. The other five samples (with the number of laboratories analysing them in parentheses) were: a chlorite rock (7), an altered basic igneous rock (5), an altered basaltic andesite (5), a biotite (6) and a potassium feldspar (7). Details of sample preparation and methods of analysis are given; no laboratory used exactly the same method as any of the other six laboratories. Results have been examined by analysis of variance; larger relative between- and within-laboratory variations occurred for the two samples containing less than 0.1% potassium than for seven of the eight other (higher potassium) samples; between-laboratory variations for the basalt BCR-1 and, to a lesser extent, the andesite AGV-1, were high and of similar magnitude to those for the samples containing less than 0.1% potassium. The causes of any poor interlaboratory agreement in the present study are considered.     

Interlaboratory system to ensure and improve the quality of glassware calibration and use in a large laboratory

This paper describes the implementation and methodology of an interlaboratory system that ensures the quality of glassware calibration and use in a large laboratory. The interlaboratory system involves periodic comparisons between laboratories with evaluations and improvements made over time. Two similar items are calibrated in each exercise according to a detailed calibration procedure. The reference value is traceable to the international system supplied by a metrology laboratory. The results are evaluated as normalized errors and analyzed by Youden graphs. The calibration procedure is presented. An interlaboratory experiment is described in which 7 participating laboratories performed calibrations of 2 volumetric flasks. The reported results, the interlaboratory evaluation, and the actions taken are presented.     

Sample preparation for the determination of steroids (corticoids and anabolics) in feed using LC

An improved sample preparation procedure for the determination of 17 steroids (corticoids (CC) and androgenic anabolic steroids (AAS)), used potentially as growth promoters, in feed samples has been developed. This procedure is based on two reported LC-UV methods. The improved procedure includes a leaching process using ACN, saponification, and SPE using polymeric cartridges. The proposed method was validated according to the EU criteria established for quantitative screening methods in PFS. The extraction efficiencies, decision limits (CCalpha) and detection capabilities (CCbeta), for these compounds were in the ranges of 82-100%, 19-40, and 24-53 microg/kg, respectively. The repeatability and the within-laboratory reproducibility at 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 CCbeta levels were smaller than 10%. Accuracy was in the 97-101% range. The robustness was evaluated using the Youden robustness test. This method was applied to the analysis of steroids in different kinds of FS with satisfactory results.     

Interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water

Sixty laboratories of five different countries participated in a large-scale interlaboratory comparison test for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water. Participants used their in-house method with 44 laboratories applying head space GC ECD analysis and 5 using liquid/liquid extraction. A set of two artificially produced samples was prepared; the halogenated hydrocarbons investigated were trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloromethane, tetrachloromethane, 1,1-dichloroethylene, dichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, bromodichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane and tribromomethane. The procedure of sample preparation, storage and distribution was monitored by an extensive quality assurance system including homogeneity tests, stability tests, and trend analysis of the submitted data. The analytical results submitted by the participants exhibited RSD values of up to 35% and outlier rates of up to 19%. The percentage of false positive and false negative results was at the highest 12% for selected substances. Recovery rates varying from 86% to 106% proved the correctness of the analytical results submitted by the participants and showed that the procedure developed in this study for sample preparation and distribution is well suited for the performance of large-scale interlaboratory comparison tests of halogenated hydrocarbons in water.     

Liquid chromatographic method for nicarbazin in broiler feeds and premixtures: development, validation, and interlaboratory study

A reversed-phase liquid chromatography method for nicarbazin in broiler feeds and premixtures was developed, validated, and interlaboratory studied. The extraction solvent was an acetonitrile-methanol (1 + 1) mixture. For feedingstuffs, water was also added. The 4,4'-dinitrocarbanilide moiety of nicarbazin was detected at a wavelength of 350 nm. Recovery was > or =87%. At 20 mg/kg, the repeatability was 0.7% and the within-laboratory reproducibility was 2.7%. The limit of determination was <20 mg/kg. Other feed additives did not interfere in the assay that proved to be applicable to broiler feeds from different European Union countries. In an interlaboratory study, 4 positive broiler feeds, 1 blank pig feed, and 1 broiler premixture were analyzed by 19 laboratories using the method developed in this study. The relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) of the feedingstuffs (20-240 mg/kg) varied between 2.6 and 10.2%. The HORRAT ranged between 0.70 and 1.22. Recoveries were 91-108%. Three laboratories detected small signals in the blind blank samples, ranging from 0.4 to 2 mg/kg. For the premixture, acceptable results for reproducibility could only be obtained after the sample weight and volume of extraction had been doubled. To avoid excessive dilution of the extracts, the range of the calibration curve had also been doubled. With this modified method, the RSDr was 5.7% and the HORRAT was 1.95 (10 laboratories).     

Is the assessment of interlaboratory comparison results for a small number of tests and limited number of participants reliable and rational?

Tests and/or test items can sometimes be expensive, unique, or only performed in a few laboratories. There can be cases where assigned values are unknown, there is no information, or only poor information on the probability density function attributed to the test result. Sometimes there are neither reference materials nor the ability to establish consensus values due to a lack of experts. It can be impossible to repeat a test on the same item because it is destroyed during the test itself, or the homogeneity of tested items is unknown and no criteria can be established. Specified technical requirements concerning proficiency testing and interlaboratory comparison schemes are generally not applicable in this situation. However, interlaboratory comparison could allow laboratories to have more confidence in their results. The present paper discusses three statistical methods of assessing interlaboratory comparison results obtained in such conditions. Two methods are based on an assigned value determined from participant results through robust analysis. The third is based on the compatibility of results assessed using the ζ parameter. This paper focuses on an interlaboratory comparison for two laboratories, each testing three samples. The use of statistical methods turns out to be high risk, particularly in terms of falsely accepting results. Additionally, is shown that methods dedicated to small samples are also not efficient in detecting discrepancies of test results.     

Interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water

Sixty laboratories of five different countries participated in a large-scale interlaboratory comparison test for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water. Participants used their in-house method with 44 laboratories applying head space GC ECD analysis and 5 using liquid/liquid extraction. A set of two artificially produced samples was prepared; the halogenated hydrocarbons investigated were trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloromethane, tetrachloromethane, 1,1-dichloroethylene, dichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, bromodichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane and tribromomethane. The procedure of sample preparation, storage and distribution was monitored by an extensive quality assurance system including homogeneity tests, stability tests, and trend analysis of the submitted data. The analytical results submitted by the participants exhibited RSD values of up to 35% and outlier rates of up to 19%. The percentage of false positive and false negative results was at the highest 12% for selected substances. Recovery rates varying from 86% to 106% proved the correctness of the analytical results submitted by the participants and showed that the procedure developed in this study for sample preparation and distribution is well suited for the performance of large-scale interlaboratory comparison tests of halogenated hydrocarbons in water. Received: 7 December 1998 / Revised: 23 March 1999 / Accepted: 24 March 1999     

Multielement trace determination in SiC powders: assessment of interlaboratory comparisons aimed at the validation and standardization of analytical procedures with direct solid sampling based on ETV ICP OES and DC arc OES

The members of the committee NMP 264 “Chemical analysis of non-oxidic raw and basic materials” of the German Standards Institute (DIN) have organized two interlaboratory comparisons for multielement determination of trace elements in silicon carbide (SiC) powders via direct solid sampling methods. One of the interlaboratory comparisons was based on the application of inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry with electrothermal vaporization (ETV ICP OES), and the other on the application of optical emission spectrometry with direct current arc (DC arc OES). The interlaboratory comparisons were organized and performed in the framework of the development of two standards related to “the determination of mass fractions of metallic impurities in powders and grain sizes of ceramic raw and basic materials” by both methods. SiC powders were used as typical examples of this category of material. The aim of the interlaboratory comparisons was to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of both analytical methods to be standardized. This was an important contribution to the practical applicability of both draft standards. Eight laboratories participated in the interlaboratory comparison with ETV ICP OES and nine in the interlaboratory comparison with DC arc OES. Ten analytes were investigated by ETV ICP OES and eleven by DC arc OES. Six different SiC powders were used for the calibration. The mass fractions of their relevant trace elements were determined after wet chemical digestion. All participants followed the analytical requirements described in the draft standards. In the calculation process, three of the calibration materials were used successively as analytical samples. This was managed in the following manner: the material that had just been used as the analytical sample was excluded from the calibration, so the five other materials were used to establish the calibration plot. The results from the interlaboratory comparisons were summarized and used to determine the repeatability and the reproducibility (expressed as standard deviations) of both methods. The calculation was carried out according to the related standard. The results are specified and discussed in this paper, as are the optimized analytical conditions determined and used by the authors of this paper. For both methods, the repeatability relative standard deviations were <25%, usually ~10%, and the reproducibility relative standard deviations were <35%, usually ~15%. These results were regarded as satifactory for both methods intended for rapid analysis of materials for which decomposition is difficult and time-consuming. Also described are some results from an interlaboratory comparison used to certify one of the materials that had been previously used for validation in both interlaboratory comparisons. Thirty laboratories (from eight countries) participated in this interlaboratory comparison for certification. As examples, accepted results are shown from laboratories that used ETV ICP OES or DC arc OES and had performed calibrations by using solutions or oxides, respectively. The certified mass fractions of the certified reference materials were also compared with the mass fractions determined in the interlaboratory comparisons performed within the framework of method standardization. Good agreement was found for most of the analytes.     

Consideration concerning interlaboratory test for cement in the last 20 years

Since 1988, over 40 laboratories representing research institutes, cement plants, pre-cast units, hydro plant construction companies, industrial construction companies, building companies, etc. from nine countries—Romania, Republic of Moldova, Croatia, Serbia, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Ukraine and Lebanon—take part every year in an interlaboratory test organized by our laboratory. The subject of the interlaboratory test for cement was 37 laboratory tests: 12 chemical determinations, 7 physical tests and 9 mechanical tests carried out with 2 types of sand, from CEPROCIM and from each participant laboratory. The paper presents the evolution of two statistical parameters (standard deviation of reproducibility and/or coefficient of variation) for a period of 20 years and for 11 laboratory tests. The results strongly prove that interlaboratory test is one of the most efficient tools to establish a common language for all the participant laboratories performing cement testing procedures.     

Rapid ultraviolet spectrophotometric and liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of natamycin in lactoserum matrix

Two rapid and simple methods were developed for the determination of natamycin in lactoserum matrix by ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometry and liquid chromatography (LC) with diode-array detection. The methods involve protein precipitation with methanol, followed by centrifugation. No cleanup is necessary. The applicable concentrations of natamycin in lactoserum range from 2 to 500 mg/L for samples analyzed by both methods. The detection and quantitation limits are 0.07 and 0.23 mg/L, respectively, for the UV spectrophotometric method and 0.1 and 0.32 mg/L, respectively, for the LC method. The methods were applied satisfactorily to the determination of natamycin in various commercial lactosera. Both methods were validated independently by standard additions and Youden methodologies, which verified their accuracy. Once the 2 proposed methods were validated independently, the validation of one method was carried out with the other.     

Determination of Nicarbazin in Animal Feed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Interlaboratory Evaluation

A liquid chromatographic method was developed for the determination of nicarbazin in feed. The samples were extracted with 90 percent acetonitrile, purified on alumina, and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The developed method was validated in-house and further verified by interlaboratory studies. The limits of detection and quantification of the method were 0.05 and 0.10 milligram per kilogram, respectively. The recoveries of nicarbazin in feed ranged between 98.3 and 111 percent, with acceptable intralaboratory reproducibility. In the interlaboratory comparison, one contaminated and three uncontaminated poultry feed samples were analyzed by thirteen laboratories using the method developed in this study. Statistical analysis confirmed the accuracy and precision of the method with verification in the interlaboratory comparison.     

Dual-opposite injection capillary electrophoresis for the determination of anionic and cationic homologous surfactants in a single run

An electrophoretic method for the simultaneous separation and determination of cationic and anionic surfactants based on double electrokinetic injection from the two ends of the capillary is proposed here. Nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE) with methanol as solvent was used to reduce the electroosmotic flow so that under these conditions the analytes migrate toward the corresponding electrode. The optimization step was the key to solve the problems associated with surfactants analysis (namely, adsorption on the capillary wall, micelle formation, and those issues related to the separation of homologous compounds). Good results were obtained with the proposed method both for the analysis of both spiked and natural samples, thus demonstrating the applicability of the proposed method for routine analysis. Finally, a comparison between the proposed method and two methods for independent analysis of cationic and anionic surfactants was made. The results showed that the precision (between 1.90 and 4.10% for repeatability and 7.43 and 8.98% for within-laboratory reproducibility, both expressed as relative standard deviation) and sensitivity (limits of detection and quantification between 0.52 and 1.88 microg/mL and between 1.73 and 6.20 microg/mL, respectively) are not affected by the CE mode. The resolution was similar to or better than that of the comparison methods and the analysis time was considerably shortened as both types of compounds were determined in a single run in only 9 min.     

Statistical evaluation of interlaboratory tests

Summary The paper criticizes the use of standard outlier tests when evaluating interlaboratory data. It is shown that many such tests are not able to detect gross outliers (masking effect). An alternative method of evaluation using tests of estimates based on robust statistics is proposed.

---

Statistische Auswertung von Ringversuchen

     

Characterization of the NIST shellfish Standard Reference Material 4358

A new shellfish Standard Reference Material 4358 was developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology through an international interlaboratory comparison that involved twelve laboratories-participants from nine countries. The results from the participants were statistically evaluated, and the most robust certified values were based on the median of laboratories’ reported means and the uncertainties derived using the bootstrap method. Massic activity certified values were established for fourteen radionuclides, five activity ratios, and informational massic activity values for eight more radionuclides and two activity ratios.     

Method validation approach on the basis of a quadratic regression model

A method validation approach that bases on a quadratic regression model in which two types of error are incorporated is presented and applied to an experimental data set. The validation approach enables the determination of analytical performance characteristics referred to in Commission Decision 2002/657/EC (i.e., repeatability, within-laboratory reproducibility, decision limit, detection capability).     

Improvements in the determination of chlorobenzenes and chlorophenols through a stepwise interlaboratory study approach

A systematic quality control programme carried out by a number of laboratories from the European Union and from EFTA countries is described. The programme was designated to improve the analytical state of the art in the determination of selected chlorinated benzenes and chlorinated phenols in different environmental matrices. To that end a stepwise interlaboratory study approach was chosen, analysing, in consecutive order, a clean extract of soil, a raw extract and the soil itself. Eight analytes were selected for the study, i.e. three chlorobenzenes and five chlorophenols. During the programme significant improvements in analytical performance were achieved, as shown by a decrease in within-laboratory coeffficients of variation as well as by acceptable coefficients of variation in the mean value of laboratory means of all analytes in the final matrix analysed, i.e. a natural soil. The results of the programme prompted the European Union to embark upon a pentachlorophenol interlaboratory certification study to produce an industrial soil candidate Certified Reference Material (CRM) [1].     

Comparability of retention indices of polar substances at elevated temperatures

Summary The non-linear dependency of the retention indices of drugs on temperature is demonstrated hence an indication of the actual working temperature is essential. Fixed temperatures for the determination of retention indices of drugs are proposed. Interlaboratory comparisons of the retention indices of 14 drugs frequently encountered in analytical practice are made for the first time on two stationary phases in three laboratories and on four GC apparatus. The data show that, in comparison with literature values, the interlaboratory deviation is reduced by 1/3 to 1/2 if same temperatures are used. Standardization of the temperature of determination of the retention indices of drugs and unknown substances in biological specimens on OV-1 and OV-17 is proposed.     

A measure for assessing certified reference ores and related materials

Experience in the certification of a number of Canadian reference ores and related materials has shown that their quality or usefulness in particular analytical applications can be evaluated objectively in terms of a so-called certification factor. This factor is defined as the ratio of the relative confidence interval of the interlaboratory consensus value for a selected element, expressed as a percentage, to the mean of the within-laboratory coefficient of variation. It is proposed that for a material to be acceptable (certifiable), its certification factor(s) must be 4.     

Approach to accuracy assessment of the glass-electrode potentiometric determination of acid-base properties

Thermodynamic data are suitable subject for investigating strategies and concepts for the evaluation of complete measurement uncertainty budgets in situations where the measurand cannot be expressed in a mathematical formula. Some suitable approaches are the various forms of Monte Carlo simulations in combination with computer-intensive statistical methods that are directed to an evaluation of empirical distribution curves for the uncertainty budget. Basis of the analysis is a cause-and-effect diagram. Some experience is available with cause-and-effect analysis of thermodynamic data derived from spectrophotometric data. Another important technique for the evaluation of thermodynamic data is glass-electrode potentiometry. On basis of a newly derived cause-and-effect diagram, a complete measurement uncertainty budget for the determination of the acidity constants of phosphoric acid by glass-electrode potentiometry is derived. A combination of Monte Carlo and bootstrap methods is applied in conjunction with the commercially available code SUPERQUAD. The results suggest that glass-electrode potentiometry may achieve a high within-laboratory precision because major uncertainty contributions become evident via interlaboratory comparisons. This finding is further underscored by analysing available literature data.