Halogenation behaviour of bidentate ligand-bridged derivatives of [Ru3(CO)12] and [Os3(CO)12]

Reaction of the ligand-bridged derivatives [M₃(CO)₁₀{μ-(RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}] and [M₃(CO)₈{μ-(RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂] (M = Ru or Os; R = Me or Prⁱ) with halogens leads to the formation of cationic products [M₃(μ-X)(CO)₁₀{μ- (RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}]⁺ and [M₃(μ-X)(CO)₈{μ-(RO)₂PN(Et)P(OR)₂}₂]⁺ (X = Cl, Br or I) in which the halogen bridges an opened edge of the metal atom framework; the crystal structure of [Ru₃(μ-I)(CO)₈{μ-(MeO)₂PN(Et)P(OMe)₂}₂]PF₆ is reported.     

Stabilisation of [Fe2(CO)9] and [Ru2(CO)9] bu substitution with bridging diphosphorus ligands

Reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₉] with a half molar amount of R₂PYPR₂ (Y = CH₂, R = Ph, Me, OMe or OPrⁱ; Y = N(Et), R = OPh, OMe or OCH₂; Y = N(Me), R = OPrⁱ or OEt) leads to the ready formation of a product which on irradiation with ultraviolet light rapidly decarbonylates to the heptacarbonyl derivative [Fe₂(μ-CO)(CO)₆{μ-R₂PYPR₂}]. Treatment of the latter with a slight excess of the appropriate ligand results, under photochemical conditions, in the formation of the dinuclear pentacarbonyl complex [Fe₂(μ-CO)(C))₄{μ-R₂PYPR₂}₂] but under thermal conditions in the formation of the mononuclear species [Fe(CO)₃{R₂PYPR₂}]. Reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with an equimolar amount of (RO)₂PN(R′)P(OR)₂ (R′ = Me, R = Prⁱ or Et; R′ = Et, R = Ph or Me) under either thermal or photochemical conditions produces [Ru₃(CO)₁₀{μ-(RO)₂PN(OR)₂}] which reacts further with excess (RO)₂PN(R′)P(OR)₂ on irradiation with ultraviolet light to afford the dinuclear compound [Ru₂(μ-CO)(CO₄{μ-(RO)₂PN(R′)P(OR)₂}₂]. The molecular structure of [Ru₂(μ-CO)(CO)₄{μ-(MeO)₂PN(Et)P(OMe)₂}₂], which has been determined by X-ray crystallography, is described.     

Substituted derivatives of [Fe2(CO)9] and [Ru2(CO)9] and their susceptibility to electrophilic attack: X-ray crystal structure of [Fe2(μ-Br)(CO)4{μ-(C6H5O)2PN(C2H5)P(OC6H5)2}2]PF6

Bis- and, in particular, tetra-substituted ditertiary phosphine and diphosphazane derivatives of [Fe₂(CO)₉] and [Ru₂(CO)₉], readily synthesised by reaction of the appropriate bidentate ligand with [Fe₂(CO)₉] and [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], respectively, are very susceptible to electrophilic attack by reagents such as halogens and protons; the solid state structure of one of the products [Fe₂(μ-Br)(CO)₄ {μ-(PhO)₂PN(Et)P(OPh)₂}₂]PF₆ has been determined by X-ray crystallography.     

Intramolecular Site Exchange of Carbonyl Ligands in the Cluster Compounds Nonacarbonyl{μ3-[η3-(1,3,5-trithiane)]}triruthenium ([Ru3(CO)9{μ3-(η3-C3H6S3)}]) and (tert-Butyl Isocyanide)octacarbonyl-{μ3-[η3-(1,3,5-trithiane)]}triruthenium ([Ru3(t-BuNC)(CO)8{μ3-(η3-C3H6S3)}])

Variable-temperature and -pressure ¹³C-NMR studies of the 1,3,5-trithiane-capped triruthenium clusters [Ru₃(CO)₉{μ₃-(η³-1,3,5-trithiane)}] ( 1 ) and [Ru₃(t-BuNC)(CO)₈{μ₃-(η³-1,3,5-trithiane)}] ( 2 ) revealed that CO site exchanges occur via an intramolecular merry-go-round process, involving a transition state mostly dissociative in character.     

The μ3-cyclopentadienylidene ligand: X-ray structure of [Ru4(CO)5 {P(OMe)3}(μ3-C5H4)2(η-C5H5)2]

UV irradiation of [Ru₂(CO)₄(η-C₅H₅)₂] yields the tri- and tetra-ruthenium complexes [Ru₂(CO)₄(η-C₅H₅){η-C₅H₄Ru(CO)₂(η-C₅H₅)}] and [Ru₄(CO)₆(μ₃-C₅H₄)₂(η-C₅H₅)₂]. The μ₃-C₅H₄ ligand in the latter has been characterised through an X-ray diffraction study on [Ru₄(CO)₅{P(OMe)₃}(μ₃-C₅H₄)₂(η-C₅H₅)₂].     

Mapping the Transformation [{RuII(CO)3Cl2}2]→[RuI2(CO)4]2+: Implications in Binuclear Water–Gas Shift Chemistry

The complete sequence of reactions in the base‐promoted reduction of [{Ru^II(CO)₃Cl₂}₂] to [Ru^I₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been unraveled. Several μ‐OH, μ:κ²‐CO₂H‐bridged diruthenium(II) complexes have been synthesized; they are the direct results of the nucleophilic activation of metal‐coordinated carbonyls by hydroxides. The isolated compounds are [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐OH)(NP^F‐Am)₂][PF₆] ( 1 ; NP^F‐Am=2‐amino‐5,7‐trifluoromethyl‐1,8‐naphthyridine) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)(μ‐OH)(NP‐Me₂)₂][BF₄]₂ ( 2 ), secured by the applications of naphthyridine derivatives. In the absence of any capping ligand, a tetranuclear complex [Ru₄(CO)₈(H₂O)₂(μ³‐OH)₂(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₄][CF₃SO₃]₂ ( 3 ) is isolated. The bridging hydroxido ligand in 1 is readily replaced by a π‐donor chlorido ligand, which results in [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐Cl)(NP‐PhOMe)₂][BF₄] ( 4 ). The production of [Ru₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been attributed to the thermally induced decarboxylation of a bis(hydroxycarbonyl)–diruthenium(II) complex to a dihydrido–diruthenium(II) species, followed by dinuclear reductive elimination of molecular hydrogen with the concomitant formation of the Ru^I? Ru^I single bond. This work was originally instituted to find a reliable synthetic protocol for the [Ru₂(CO)₄(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ precursor. It is herein prescribed that at least four equivalents of base, complete removal of chlorido ligands by Tl^I salts, and heating at reflux in acetonitrile for a period of four hours are the conditions for the optimal conversion. Premature quenching of the reaction resulted in the isolation of a trinuclear Ru^I₂Ru^II complex [{Ru(NP‐Am)₂(CO)}{Ru₂(NP‐Am)₂(CO)₂(μ‐CO)₂}(μ₃:κ³‐C,O,O′‐CO₂)][BF₄]₂ ( 6 ). These unprecedented diruthenium compounds are the dinuclear congeners of the water–gas shift (WGS) intermediates. The possibility of a dinuclear pathway eliminates the inherent contradiction of pH demands in the WGS catalytic cycle in an alkaline medium. A cooperative binuclear elimination could be a viable route for hydrogen production in WGS chemistry.     

Unusual rearrangement of the Ru3(μ-CO)2(CO)6{μ3-η1:η1:η4:η4-C4Ph2(CH=CHPh)2} complex containing an open triruthenium framework to the Ru3-triangular cluster Ru3(CO)8{μ3-η1:η1:η4:η2-C4Ph2(CH=CHPh)2}. Reactions of Ru3(CO)8{μ3-η1:η1:η4:η2-C4Ph2(CH=CHPh)2} with PPh3, P(OPri)3, CO, and the crystal structure of Ru3(CO)8(PPh3{μ-η1:η1:η4-C4Ph2(CH=CHPh)2}

Complex Ru₃(μ-CO)₂(CO)₆{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η⁴:η⁴-C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂} containing an open triruthenium framework undergoes rearrangement to the Ru₃-triangular Ru₃(CO)₈{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η⁴:η²-C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂) cluster when heated in refluxing hexane. Reactions of the latter complex with PPh₃, P(OPrⁱ)₃, and CO were studied. The structure of one of the reaction products, the Ru₃(CO)₈(PPh₃{μ₃-η¹:η¹:η⁴-C₄Ph₂(CH=CHPh)₂} cluster, was established by X-ray structural analysis.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)n(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (n = 4; 5) und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)_n(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (n = 4; 5) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] The reaction of [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 2 ) with dppm yields the dinuclear species [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). Under thermal or photolytic conditions 3 loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and affords the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). 4 is also obtainable by an one‐pot synthesis from [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], an excess of ^tBu₂PH and stoichiometric amounts of dppm via the formation of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)₂] ( 1 ). 4 exhibits a Ru–Ru double bond which could be confirmed by addition of methylene to the dimetallacyclopropane [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ). The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 5 were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Synthese und Eigenschaften der heteronuklearen Metallatomcluster Re4(CO)12[μ3-GaRe(CO)5]4 und Re2(CO)3[μ-GaRe(CO)5]2

Synthesis and Properties of Heteronuclear Metal Atom Clusters Re₄(CO)₁₂[μ₃-GaRe(CO)₅]₄ and Re₂(CO)₈[μ-GaRe(CO)₅]₂ The title compounds were prepared by the reaction of gallium halides and dirhenium decacarbonyl. Crystals of the four-membered cluster Re₂(CO)₈[μ-GaRe(CO)₅]₂ gave at 300⁰C with aggregation of four Re atoms to an inner Re₄ tetrahedron the product Re₄(CO)₁₂(CO)[μ₃-GaRe(CO)₅]₄and with Ga₂I₃ shown by mass spectroscopic measurements the molecule ion Re₄(CO)₁₆+. In tetra-hydrofuran solution the cluster Re₄(CO)₁₂[μ₃-GaRe(CO)₅]₄ and the hydride Li[C₂H₅)₃BH] have formed the formyl complex Li₄{Re₄(CO)₁₂[μ₃ -GaRe(CO)₄(CHO)] ₄}, which was estimated by ¹H n. m. r. and i. r. spectroscopic data. Both synthesized gallium rhenium carbonyl clusters were characterized by i.r. spectroscopic measurements. The comparison of these results with those of the structurally known indium rhenium carbonyl clusters led to proposals of the molecule structure of the analogous gallium rhenium compounds.     

Vierkernige Clusterkomplexe vom Typ [MM′(AuPR3)2(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy2)(μ4‐PCy)(CO)6] (M,M′ = Mn,Re; R = Ph,Cy, Et): Synthese,Struktur und Topomerisierung

Tetranuclear Cluster Complexes of the Type [MM′(AuR₃)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(μ₄‐PCy)(CO)₆] (M,M′ = Mn, Re; R = Ph, Cy, Et): Synthesis, Structure, and Topomerisation The dirhenium complex [Re₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(CO)₇(ax‐H₂PCy)] ( 1 ) reacts at room temperature in thf solution with each two equivalents of the base DBU and of ClAuPR₃ (R = Ph, Cy, Et) in a photochemical reaction process to afford the tetranuclear clusters [Re₂(AuPR₃)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(μ₄‐PCy)(CO)₆] (R = Ph ( 2 ), Cy ( 3 ), Et ( 4 )) in yields of 35–48%. The homologue [Mn₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(CO)₇(ax‐H₂PCy)] ( 5 ) leads under the same reaction conditions to the corresponding products [Mn₂(AuPR₃)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(μ₄‐PCy)(CO)₆] (R = Ph ( 6 ), Et ( 8 )). Also [MnRe(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(CO)₇(ax/eq‐H₂PCy)] ( 9 ) reacts under formation of [MnRe(AuPR₃)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(μ₄‐PCy)(CO)₆] (R = Ph ( 10 ), Et ( 11 )). All new cluster complexes were identified by means of ¹H‐NMR, ³¹P‐NMR and ν(CO)‐IR spectroscopic measurements. 2 , 4 and 10 have also been characterized by single crystal X‐ray structure analyses with crystal parameters: 2 triclinic, space group P 1, a = 12.256(4) Å, b = 12.326(4) Å, c = 24.200(6) Å, α = 83.77(2)°, β = 78.43(2)°, γ = 68.76(2)°, Z = 2; 4 monoclinic, space group C2/c, a = 12.851(3) Å, b = 18.369(3) Å, c = 40.966(8) Å, β = 94.22(1)°, Z = 8; 10 triclinic, space group P 1, a = 12.083(1) Å, b = 12.185(2) Å, c = 24.017(6) Å, α = 83.49(29)°, β = 78.54(2)°, γ = 69.15(2)°, Z = 2. The trapezoid arrangement of the metal atoms in 2 and 4 show in the solid structure trans‐positioned an open and a closed Re…Au edge. In solution these edges are equivalent and, on the ³¹P NMR time scale, represent two fluxional Re–Au bonds in the course of a topomerization process. Corresponding dynamic properties were observed for the dimanganese compounds 6 and 8 but not for the related MnRe clusters 10 and 11 . 2 and 4 are the first examples of cluster compounds with a permanent Re–Au bond valence isomerization.     

Reaction of [Ru3(CO)12] with tri(2-furyl)phosphine: Di- and tri-substituted triruthenium and phosphido-bridged diruthenium complexes

Reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with tri(2-furyl)phosphine, P(C₄H₃O)₃, at 40 °C in the presence of a catalytic amount of Na[Ph₂CO] furnishes two triruthenium complexes [Ru₃(CO)₁₀{P(C₄H₃O)₃}₂] (1) and [Ru₃(CO)₉{P(C₄H₃O)₃}₃] (2) with the ligand coordinated through the phosphorus atom. Treatment of 1 and 2 with Me₃NO at 40 °C affords the dinuclear phosphido-bridged complexes [Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}] (3) and [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}{P(C₄H₃O)₃}] (4), respectively, that are formed via phosphorus–carbon bond cleavage of a coordinated phosphine followed by coordination of the dissociated furyl moiety to the diruthenium center in a σ,π-alkenyl mode. Reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with tri(2-furyl)phosphine in refluxing benzene gives, in addition to 3 and 4, low yields of the cyclometallated complex [Ru₃(CO)₉{μ-η¹,η¹-P(C₄H₃O)₂(C₄H₂O)}₂] (5). Treatment of 3 with EPh₃ (E = P, As, Sb) at room temperature yields the monosubstituted derivatives [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}(EPh₃)] (E = P, 8; E = As, 9; E = Sb, 10). Similar reactions of 3 with P(C₄H₃O)₃, P(OMe)₃ and Bu^tNC yield 4, [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}{P(OMe)₃}] (11) and [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}(NCBu^t)] (12), respectively. The molecular structures of complexes 3, 4 and 8 have been elucidated by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Each complex contains a bridging σ,π-alkenyl group and while in 4 the phosphine is bound to the σ-coordinated metal atom, in 8 it is at the π-bound atom. Protonation of 3 and 4 gives the hydride complexes [(μ-H)Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}]⁺ (6) and [(μ-H)Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}{P(C₄H₃O)₃}]⁺ (7), respectively, while heating 3 with dimethylacetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD) in refluxing toluene gives the cyclotrimerization product, C₆(CO₂Me)₆.     

The insertion of acetylene into the formal ruthenium-phosphorus bonds of closo-[Ru4(μ4-PPh)2(μ2-CO)(CO)10. Crystal structure of [Ru4(μ4-PPh){μ4-η-P(Ph)CHCH}(μ2-CO)(CO)10]

Treatment of closo-[Ru₄(μ₄-PPh)₂(μ₂-CO)(CO)₁₀] with acetylene under ambient conditions leads to the insertion of the acetylene into the skeletal framework of the cluster and the formation of [Ru₄(μ₄-PPh){μ₄-η³-P(Ph)CHCH}(μ₂-CO)(CO)₁₀], the structure of which has been determined X-ray crystallographically.     

Structure and catalytic activity of the ruthenium(I) sawhorse‐type complex [Ru2{μ,η2‐CF3(CF2)5COO}2(DMSO)2(CO)4]

The title compound, cis‐di‐μ‐perfluoroheptanoato‐κ⁴O:O′‐bis[dicarbonyl(dimethyl sulfoxide‐κS)ruthenium(I)](Ru—Ru), [Ru₂(C₇F₁₃O₂)₂(C₂H₆OS)₂(CO)₄], is a sawhorse‐type dinuclear ruthenium complex with two bridging perfluoroheptanoate ligands, and with two dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligands in the axial positions coordinating via the S atoms. It is a new example of a compound with an aliphatic fluorinated carboxylate ligand. The Ru—Ru bond distance of 2.6908 (3) Å indicates a direct Ru—Ru interaction. The compound is an active catalyst in transvinylation of propionic acid with vinyl acetate.     

[SnI8{Fe(CO)4}4]2+: Highly Coordinated Sn+III8 Subunit with Fragile Carbonyl Clips

[SnI₈{Fe(CO)₄}₄][Al₂Cl₇]₂ contains the [SnI₈{Fe(CO)₄}₄]²⁺ cation with an unprecedented highly coordinated, bicapped SnI₈ prism. Given the eightfold coordination with the most voluminous stable halide, it is all the more surprising that this SnI₈ arrangement is surrounded only by fragile Fe(CO)₄ groups in a clip‐like fashion. Inspite of a predominantly ionic bonding situation in [SnI₈{Fe(CO)₄}₄]²⁺, the I^????I^? distances are considerably shortened (down to 371 pm) and significantly less than the van der Waals distance (420 pm). The title compound is characterized by single‐crystal structure analysis, spectroscopic methods (EDXS, FTIR, Raman, UV/Vis, Mössbauer), thermogravimetry, and density functional theory methods.     

[(Te2)3{Mn(CO)3}2{Mn(CO)4}3]– – A Novel Tellurium‐­Manganese Carbonyl with Ufosane‐like Structure

By reacting Mn₂(CO)₁₀ and TeI₄ in the ionic liquid[BMIm][OTf] (1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium trifluromethanesulfonate), brick‐red crystals of [BMIm][(Te₂)₃{Mn(CO)₃}₂{Mn(CO)₄}₃]are obtained. The title compound contains the carbonyl anion[(Te₂)₃{Mn(CO)₃}₂{Mn(CO)₄}₃]^–. Herein, three formal Te₂^2– units and two formal Mn(CO)₃⁺ fragments establish a distorted heterocubane‐like Te₆Mn₂ structure. Three edges of this heterocubane are furthermore capped by Mn(CO)₄⁺ fragments. The resulting Te₆Mn₅ building unit, moreover, looks very similar to the P₁₁^3– anion – the so‐called ufosane. The mean distances Te–Te and Te–Mn are observed with 277.6 and 264.7 pm, respectively. In addition to single‐crystal structure analysis, the title compound is characterized by infrared spectroscopy (FT‐IR), thermogravimetry (TG) and energy‐dispersive X‐ray (EDX) analysis.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)5(μ‐H)2(μ‐PCy2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2){μ‐η2‐PCy2C(S)}(μ3‐S)] und [Ru3(CO)5(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐PCy2)2(μ3‐S)]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] and [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] [Ru₃(CO)₆(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts under mild conditions with CS₂ and yields by oxidative decarbonylation and insertion of CS into one phosphido bridge the opened 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐dppm){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] ( 2 ) with only two M–M bonds. The compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; α = 84.65(3), β = 77.21(3), γ = 81.87(3)° and V = 2790.7(11) ų. The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₇(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂] ( 3 ) with CS₂ in refluxing toluene affords the 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] ( 4 ). The compound cristallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/a with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; β = 104.223(16)° and V = 4570.9(10) ų. Although in the solid state structure one elongated Ru–Ru bond has been found the complex 4 can be considered by means of the ³¹P‐NMR data as an electron‐rich metal cluster.     

Deprotonierung von Mn2(μ-H)(μ-PR2)(CO)8 (R=Ph,Cy) zur Synthese von Heteronuklearen Mangan—Gold Clustern mit Mn2Aun-Kernen (n = 1 – 3)

Deprotonation of Mn₂(μ-H)(μ-PR₂)(CO)₈ (R = Ph Cy) for Synthesis of Heteronuclear Manganese-Gold Clusters with Mn₂Au_n Cores (n = 1–3) The dimanganese complexes Mn₂(μ-H)(μ-PR₂)(CO)₈ (R = Ph, Cy) have been deprotonated with 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-en (DBU) in tetrahydrofuran solution at 20^°C to give the anions [Mn₂(μ-PR₂)(CO)₈]^?, which were isolated as tetraethylammonium salts. Both dimanganese complexes and the related anions were measured by cyclic voltammetry. The treatment of the aforementioned dimanganese complexes in thf solution with Lir' (R =Me, Ph) and subsequently with PPh₃AuCl gave at 20^°C three types of products: Mn₂(μ-PR₂(CO)₈(AuPPh₃),Mn₂(μ-PR₂)(μ-C(R′)O)(CO)₆-(AuPPh₃)₂ and Mn₂(μ-PR₂)(CO)₆(AuPPh₃)₃. The newly prepared substances were characterized by means of IR-, UV/VIS, ³¹P NMR data. The results of single X-ray analyses showed for the three-membered metal ring compound Mn₂(μ-PPh₂)(CO)₈(AuPPh₃) an uni-fold bridged σ(Mn? Mn) bond length of 306.7(3) pm, the metallatetrahedron complex Mn₂(μ-PPh₃)(μ-C(Ph)O(CO)₆(AuPPh₃)₂ a twofold bridged σ(Mn? Mn) bond length of 300.6(4) pm and the trigonal-bipyramidal cluster Mn₂(μ-Pph₂)(CO)₆(AuPPh₃)₃ an uni-fold bridged π(Mn? Mn) bond length of 274.7(3) pm. The Mn? Au bonds of these substances are accompanyied by semi-bridging CO ligands which are signified through short Au…C contact lengths in the range of 251 to 270 pm. In the substance with the Mn₂Au₂ metallatetrahedron core exists, additionally, such a contact with the acylic C atom of C(Ph)O bridging group of 263.4(18) pm. Such contact lengths were compared for corresponding dimanganese and dirhenium complexes.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐X)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (X = Cl,S2CH)

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐X)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (X = Cl, S₂CH) [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) reacts in benzene with elemental sulfur to the addition product [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). 2 is also obtained by reaction of 1 with ethylene sulfide. The reaction of 1 with carbon disulfide yields with insertion of the CS₂ into the Ru₂(μ‐H) bridge the dithioformato complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐S₂CH)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ). Furthermore, 1 reacts with [NO][BF₄] to the complex salt [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)][BF₄] ( 4 ), and reaction of 1 with CCl₄ or CHCl₃ affords spontaneously [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐Cl)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) in nearly quantitative yield. The molecular structures of 2 , 3 and 5 were confirmed by crystal structure analyses.     

Reduction products of dinuclear [Rh2Cl2(CO)2 {μ-(PhO)2PN(Et)P(OPh)2}2]. Crystal structure of [Rh2HgCl(μ-H)(CO)2 {μ-(PhO)2PN(Et)P(OPh)2}2]

Treatment of [Rh₂Cl₂(CO)₂ {μ-(PhO)₂PN(Et)P(OPh)₂}₂] with various reducing agents gives a number of products, the type depending on the conditions employed. The products isolated include [Rh₂(CO)₂{μ-(PhO)₂PN(Et)P(OPh)₂}₂], [Rh₂(CO)₃{μ-(PhO)₂PN(Et)P(OPh)₂}₂],and [Rh₂HgCl(μ-H)(CO)₂{μ-(PhO)₂PN(Et)P(OPh)₂}₂]; the structure of the last complex was determined by X-ray diffraction.     

Electrochemical behaviour of [Ru(L)(CO)2Cl2] [Ru(L)(CO)Cl3][Me4N] and [Ru(L)(CO)2(CH3CN)2][CF3SO3]2 complexes (L = 2,2′- bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine)

The clectrochemical behaviour of the complexes [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂], [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ (L = 2,2′-bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine) has been investigated in CH₃CN. The oxidation of [Ru(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] produces new complexes [Ru^III(L)(CO)(CH₃CN)₂Cl]²⁺ as a consequence of the instability of the electrogenerated transient Ru^III species [Ru^III(L)(CO)₂Cl₂]⁺. In contrast, the oxidation of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] produces the stable [Ru^III(L)(CO)Cl₃] complex. In contrast [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ is not oxidized in the range up to the most positive potentials achievable. The reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ results in the formation of identical dark blue strongly adherent electroactive films. These films exhibit the characteristics of a metal-metal bond dimer structure. No films are obtained on reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N]. The effect of the substitution of the bipyridine ligand by electron-withdrawing carboxy ester groups on the electrochemical behaviour of all these complexes has also been investigated.