Children’s conceptions on the structure of an array: Using quick images as a gateway to multiplicative ideas

In this paper we report the conceptions about arrays that came to the fore as one class of second-grade students participated in whole classroom discussions and activities focused on the structure of arrays presented as a Quick Images routine. Before the intervention, students were not introduced to formal multiplication but had completed a unit on arrays. A constant comparative method was used to identify numeric and spatial structuring strategies that allowed for students’ conceptions about the structure of the array to emerge. Results indicated that not all students automatically use arrays as a composite of rows. We found that the use of Quick Images with larger arrays and non-arrays within the whole classroom discussion was successful at eliciting and directing students’ attention towards the spatial features of an array, including seeing an array as made of a composite of rows (or columns).     

Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding?

Differing perspectives have been offered about student use of recursive and explicit rules. These include: (a) promoting the use of explicit rules over the use of recursive rules, and (b) encouraging student use of both recursive and explicit rules. This study sought to explore students’ use of recursive and explicit rules by examining the reasoning of 25 sixth-grade students, including a focus on four target students, as they approached tasks in which they were required to develop generalizations while using computer spreadsheets as an instructional tool. The results demonstrate the difficulty that students had moving from the successful use of recursive rules toward explicit rules. In particular, two students abandoned general reasoning, instead focusing on particular values in an attempt to construct explicit rules. It is recommended that students be encouraged to connect recursive and explicit rules as a potential means for constructing successful generalizations.     

Possible Student Justification of Proofs

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics calls for an increased emphasis on proof and reasoning in school mathematics curricula. Given such an emphasis, mathematics teachers must be prepared to structure curricular experiences so that students develop an appreciation for both the value of proof and for those strategies that will assist them in developing proving skills. Such an outcome is more likely when the teacher feels secure in his/her own understanding of the concept of “mathematical proof” and understands the ways in which students progress as they take on increasingly more complex mathematical justifications. In this article, a model of mathematical proof, based on Balacheff's Taxonomy of Mathematical Proof, outlining the levels through which students might progress as they develop proving skills is discussed. Specifically, examples of the various ways in which students operating at different levels of skill sophistication could approach three different mathematical proof tasks are presented. By considering proofs under this model, teachers are apt to gain a better understanding of each student's entry skill level and so effectively guide him/her toward successively more sophisticated skill development.     

The Advantages of an STS Approach Over a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach in Middle School Science

Two sections of middle school science were taught by two longtime teachers where one used an STS approach and the other followed the more typical textbook approach closely. Pre‐ and post assessments were administered to one section of students for each teacher. The testing focused on student concept mastery, general science achievement, concept applications, use of concepts in new situations, and attitudes toward science. Videotapes of classroom actions were recorded and analyzed to determine the level of the use of STS teaching strategies in the two sections. Information was also be collected that gave evidence of and noted changes in student creativity and the continuation of student learning and the use of it beyond the classroom. Major findings indicate that students experiencing the STS format where constructivist teaching practices were used to (a) learn basic concepts as well as students who studied them directly from the textbook, (b) achieve as much in terms of general concept mastery as students who studied almost exclusively by using a textbook closely, (c) apply science concepts in new situations better than students who studied science in a more traditional way, (d) develop more positive attitudes about science, (e) exhibit creativity skills more often and more uniquely, and (f) learn and use science at home and in the community more than did students in the textbook dominated classroom.     

An Investigation of Relationships between Seventh-Grade Students' Beliefs and Their Participation during Mathematics Discussions in Two Classrooms

As mathematics teachers attempt to promote classroom discourse that emphasizes reasoning about mathematical concepts and supports students' development of mathematical autonomy, not all students will participate similarly. For the purposes of this research report, I examined how 15 seventh-grade students participated during whole-class discussions in two mathematics classrooms. Additionally, I interpreted the nature of students' participation in relation to their beliefs about participating in whole-class discussions, extending results reported previously (Jansen, 2006) about a wider range of students' beliefs and goals in discussion-oriented mathematics classrooms. Students who believed mathematics discussions were threatening avoided talking about mathematics conceptually across both classrooms, yet these students participated by talking about mathematics procedurally. In addition, students' beliefs about appropriate behavior during mathematics class appeared to constrain whether they critiqued solutions of their classmates in both classrooms. Results suggest that coordinating analyses of students' beliefs and participation, particularly focusing on students who participate outside of typical interaction patterns in a classroom, can provide insights for engaging more students in mathematics classroom discussions.     

Prospective elementary teachers use of representation to reason algebraically

We used a teaching experiment to evaluate the preparation of preservice teachers to teach early algebra concepts in the elementary school with the goal of improving their ability to generalize and justify algebraic rules when using pattern-finding tasks. Nearly all of the elementary preservice teachers generalized explicit rules using symbolic notation but had trouble with justifications early in the experiment. The use of isomorphic tasks promoted their ability to justify their generalizations and to understand the relationship of the coefficient and y-intercept to the models constructed with pattern blocks. Based on critical events in the teaching experiment, we developed a scale to map changes in preservice teachers’ understanding. Features of the tasks emerged that contributed to this understanding.     

A tale of two sets of norms: Comparing opportunities for student agency in mathematics lessons with and without interactive simulations

Previous research has documented the importance of setting up productive norms in mathematics classrooms. Studies have also shown the potential for activities involving interactive simulations (sims) to support student engagement and learning. In this study, we investigated the relationship between norms and sim-based activities. In particular, we examined the social and sociomathematical norms in lessons taught with and without the use of PhET sims in the same teacher’s middle-school mathematics classroom. There were statistically significant differences in indicators of social norms between the two types of lessons. In sim lessons, the teacher more frequently took the role of a facilitator of mathematical ideas, and students exhibited conceptual agency more often than they did in non-sim lessons. On the other hand, there was substantial overlap: the teacher usually acted as an evaluator, and the students usually exhibited disciplinary agency in both types of lessons. However, there was a stark contrast in sociomathematical norms between the two types of lessons. Students’ specifically mathematical obligations in non-sim lessons consistently included practicing procedures in isolation and appealing to rules. Obligations in sim lessons included developing and sharing strategies, making conjectures and providing justifications. In both types of lessons, students were obligated to recall mathematical facts and vocabulary. Thus, the social norms were broadly consistent except for important differences in frequency, whereas we found substantial qualitative contrasts in the sociomathematical norms in the two types of lessons. This case provides evidence that contrasting norms can exist within the same classroom. We argue from our data that these differences may be mediated by curricular choices—in this case, the use of sims.     

How Focusing Phenomena in the Instructional Environment Support Individual Students' Generalizations

This article sets forth a way of connecting the classroom instructional environment with individual students' generalizations. To do so, we advance the notion of focusing phenomena, that is, regularities in the ways in which teachers, students, artifacts, and curricular materials act together to direct attention toward certain mathematical properties over others. The construct of focusing phenomena emerged from an empirical study conducted during a 5-week unit on slope and linear functions in a high school classroom using a reform curriculum. Qualitative evidence from interviews with 7 students revealed that students interpreted the m value in y = b + mx as a difference rather than a ratio as a result of counterproductive generalization afforded by focusing phenomena. Classroom analysis revealed 4 focusing phenomena, which regularly directed students' attention to various sets of differences rather than to the coordination of quantities.     

Analyzing the word-problem performance and strategies of students experiencing mathematics difficulty

The purpose of this study was to examine the word-problem performance and strategies utilized by 3rd-grade students experiencing mathematics difficulty (MD). We assessed the efficacy of a word-problem intervention and compared the word-problem performance of students with MD who received intervention (n = 51) to students with MD who received general education classroom word-problem instruction (n = 60). Intervention occurred for 16 weeks, 3 times per week, 30 min per session and focused on helping students understand the schemas of word problems. Results demonstrated that students with MD who received the word-problem intervention outperformed students with MD who received general education classroom word-problem instruction. We also analyzed the word-problem strategies of 30 randomly-selected students from the study to understand how students set up and solve word problems. Students who received intervention demonstrated more sophisticated word-problem strategies than students who only received general education classroom word-problem instruction. Findings suggest students with MD benefit from use of meta-cognitive strategies and explicit schema instruction to solve word problems.     

What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation

In this paper, I use analyses of collective argumentation in a variety of classroom settings, from elementary school to a university-level differential equations class to illustrate various roles the teacher plays. These include initiating the negotiation of classroom norms that foster argumentation as the core of students’ mathematical activity, providing support for students as they interact with each other to develop arguments, and supplying argumentative supports (data, warrants, and backing) that are either omitted or left implicit. We gain two important insights from these analyses. First, an emphasis on argumentation can be used productively to provide openings in mathematical discussions for new mathematical concepts and tools to emerge. Second, the analyses demonstrate that teachers need to have both an in-depth understanding of students’ mathematical conceptual development and a sophisticated understanding of the mathematical concepts that underlie the instructional activities being used.     

Early algebra and mathematical generalization

We examine issues that arise in students’ making of generalizations about geometrical figures as they are introduced to linear functions. We focus on the concepts of patterns, function, and generalization in mathematics education in examining how 15 third grade students (9 years old) come to produce and represent generalizations during the implementation of two lessons from a longitudinal study of early algebra. Many students scan output values of f(n) as n increases, conceptualizing the function as a recursive sequence. If this instructional route is pursued, educators need to recognize how students’ conceptualizations of functions depart from the closed form expressions ultimately aimed for. Even more fundamentally, it is important to nurture a transition from empirical generalizations, based on conjectures regarding cases at hand, to theoretical generalizations that follow from operations on explicit statements about mathematical relations.     

Probing interactions in exploratory teaching: a case study

This study investigates an exploratory teaching style used in an undergraduate geometry course to help students identify an ellipse. We attempt to probe beneath the surface of exploration to understand how the actions of teachers can contribute to developing students’ competence in justifying an ellipse. We analyse the complex interactions between student, content, and teacher, and discuss explicit pedagogical strategies that help students develop a higher level of geometric reasoning. The findings indicate that students engaged in guided explorations by the teacher and in group discussions with peers were able to identify an ellipse and justify their reasoning.     

The co-construction of arguments by middle-school students

This paper highlights the value of student collaboration in doing mathematics, demonstrates how urban, middle-school students, working together, co-constructed justifications for their solutions, and shows that certain conditions are associated with the promotion of a culture of reasoning. It is documented that students collaboratively built arguments that took the form of proof, challenged each others’ arguments, and justified these arguments in small groups and whole class discussions. In producing their mathematical justifications, students included the input of others. Finally, the way in which students, by expanding on the arguments of others, also used alternative forms of reasoning which in many cases led to even more refined arguments is discussed.     

Exploring informal mathematical products of low achievers at the secondary school level

This article examines the notion of informal mathematical products, in the specific context of teaching mathematics to low achieving students at the secondary school level. The complex and relative nature of this notion is illustrated and some of its characteristics are suggested. These include the use of ad-hoc strategies, mental calculations, idiosyncratic ideas, everyday rather than mathematical language, non-symbolic explanations, visual justifications and common-sense based reasoning. The main argument raised in the article concerns the challenge of valuing informal mathematical products, created by low achievers, and using them within the mathematics classroom as means for advancing such students. The data draws from several research and design projects conducted in Israel since 1991. Selected examples of students’ products, gathered from low-track mathematics classrooms involved in these projects, are presented and analyzed. The analyses highlight various features of such products, and portray the possible gains of teaching approaches that legitimize, and build onwards from, informal products of low achievers.     

Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns

This paper discusses the content and structure of generalization involving figural patterns of middle school students, focusing on the extent to which they are capable of establishing and justifying complicated generalizations that entail possible overlap of aspects of the figures. Findings from an ongoing 3-year longitudinal study of middle school students are used to extend the knowledge base in this area. Using pre-and post-interviews and videos of intervening teaching experiments, we specify three forms of generalization involving such figural linear patterns: constructive standard; constructive nonstandard; and deconstructive; and we classify these forms of generalization according to complexity based on student work. We document students’ cognitive tendency to shift from a figural to a numerical strategy in determining their figural-based patterns, and we observe the not always salutary consequences of such a shift in their representational fluency and inductive justifications.     

The Development of Mathematical Discussions: An Investigation in a Fifth-Grade Classroom

Promoting discussion and argumentation of mathematical ideas among students are aspects of the vision for communication in recent school mathematics reform efforts. Having rich mathematical discussions, however, can present a variety of classroom challenges. Many factors influence classroom discussions and need to be addressed in ways that will assist teachers in creating more inquiry-based mathematics classrooms. The study presented here examined the development of mathematical discussions in a fifth-grade classroom over the course of a school year. Various aspects of the participants' interactions, teacher's pedagogy, and the classroom microculture were investigated. One major result is the evolution of student participation from nonactive listening to active listening and use of others' ideas to develop new conjectures. These changes were paralleled by changes in the teacher's role in the classroom and the nature of her questions, in particular.     

Mathematics teaching practices with technology that support conceptual understanding for Latino/a students

We analyze how three seventh grade mathematics teachers from a majority Latino/a, linguistically diverse region of Texas taught the same lesson on interpreting graphs of motion as part of the Scaling Up SimCalc study (Roschelle et al., 2010). The students of two of the teachers made strong learning gains as measured by a curriculum-aligned assessment, while the students of the third teacher were less successful. To investigate these different outcomes, we compare the teaching practices in each classroom, focusing on the teachers’ use of class time and instructional format, their use of mathematical discourse practices in whole-class discussions, and their responses to student contributions. We show that the more successful teachers allowed time for students to use the curriculum and software and discuss it with peers, that they used formal mathematical discourse along with less formal language, and that they responded to student errors using higher-level moves. We conclude by discussing implications for teachers and mathematics educators, with special attention to issues related to the mathematics education of Latinos/as.     

The Development of Mathematical Discussions: An Investigation in a Fifth-Grade Classroom

Promoting discussion and argumentation of mathematical ideas among students are aspects of the vision for communication in recent school mathematics reform efforts. Having rich mathematical discussions, however, can present a variety of classroom challenges. Many factors influence classroom discussions and need to be addressed in ways that will assist teachers in creating more inquiry-based mathematics classrooms. The study presented here examined the development of mathematical discussions in a fifth-grade classroom over the course of a school year. Various aspects of the participants' interactions, teacher's pedagogy, and the classroom microculture were investigated. One major result is the evolution of student participation from nonactive listening to active listening and use of others' ideas to develop new conjectures. These changes were paralleled by changes in the teacher's role in the classroom and the nature of her questions, in particular.     

Graphing in Groups: Learning About Lines in a Collaborative Classroom Network Environment

This article presents a design experiment in which we explore new structures for classroom collaboration supported by a classroom network of handheld graphing calculators. We describe a design for small group investigations of linear functions and present findings from its implementation in three high school algebra classrooms. Our coding of the problem-solving efforts of six student focus pairs in this environment over the course of several class sessions indicates that these students tended to move from exploratory and visual to more analytic means of establishing lines of a specified slope. As they adopted these analytic approaches, they were also more likely to enact their strategies jointly. In closer examination of emerging analytic strategies in episodes selected from the work of one of the pairs, we argue that the processes by which these students discovered the need for coordinated action on their respective points, and came to establish mathematical meaning for the relations between their coordinate locations as slope, were overlapping and intertwined.     

Reasoning and proof in geometry: effects of a learning environment based on heuristic worked-out examples

We analyze heuristic worked-out examples as a tool for learning argumentation and proof. Their use in the mathematics classroom was motivated by findings on traditional worked-out examples, which turned out to be efficient for learning algorithmic problem solving. The basic idea of heuristic worked-out examples is that they encourage explorative processes and thus reflect explicitly different phases while performing a proof. We tested the hypotheses that teaching with heuristic examples is more effective than usual classroom instruction in an experimental classroom study with 243 grade 8 students. The results suggest that heuristic worked-out examples were more effective than the usual mathematics instruction. In particular, students with an insufficient understanding of proof were able to benefit from this learning environment.