Ruthenium(II/III)‐Based Compounds with Encouraging Antiproliferative Activity against Non‐small‐Cell Lung Cancer

Hereby we present the synthesis of several ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) dithiocarbamato complexes. Proceeding from the Na[trans‐Ru^III(dmso)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and cis‐[Ru^II(dmso)₄Cl₂] ( 3 ) precursors, the diamagnetic, mixed‐ligand [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes 4 and 5 , the paramagnetic, neutral [Ru^IIIL₃] monomers 6 and 7 , the antiferromagnetically coupled ionic α‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl complexes 8 and 9 as well as the β‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl dinuclear species 10 and 11 (L=dimethyl‐ (DMDT) and pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDT)) were obtained. All the compounds were fully characterised by elemental analysis as well as ¹H NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, for the first time the crystal structures of the dinuclear β‐[Ru^III₂(dmdt)₅]BF₄ ? CHCl₃ ? CH₃CN and of the novel [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes were also determined and discussed. For both the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^II and Ru^III complexes the central metal atoms assume a distorted octahedral geometry. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes has been evaluated on non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI‐H1975 cells. All the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^III dithiocarbamato compounds (i.e., complexes 6 – 10 ) show interesting cytotoxic activity, up to one order of magnitude higher with respect to cisplatin. Otherwise, no significant antiproliferative effect for either the precursors 2 and 3 or the Ru^II complexes 4 and 5 has been observed.     

Lewis Acid Binding and Transfer as a Versatile Experimental Gauge of the Lewis Basicity of Fe0, Ru0, and Pt0 Complexes

A number of zerovalent ruthenium tri‐ and tetracarbonyl complexes of the form [Ru(CO)_5?nL_n] (n=1, 2) with neutral phosphine or N‐heterocyclic carbene donor ligands have been treated with the Lewis acids GaCl₃ and Ag⁺ to form a range of metal‐only Lewis pairs (MOLPs). The spectroscopic and structural parameters of the adducts are compared to each other and to related iron carbonyl based MOLPs. The Lewis basicity of the original Ru⁰ complexes is gauged by transfer experiments, as well as through the degree of pyramidization of the bound GaCl₃ units and the Ru?M bond lengths. The work shows the benefits of the MOLP concept as one of the few direct experimental gauges of metal basicity, and one that can allow comparisons between metal complexes with different metal centers and ligand sets.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Isomers of Ru-Substituted Keggin-Type Germanotungstate with dmso Ligand

We found that three isomers of mono-Ru substituted Keggin-type germanotungstate with a dmso ligand, [GeW₁₁O₃₉Ru^II(dmso)]^6?, could be formed by a reaction of α-Keggin-type mono-lacunary germanotungstate, [α-GeW₁₁O₃₉]^8?, with Ru(dmso)₄Cl₂. The main isomer is an α-isomer, and the others are β₂-isomer and β₃-isomer, which were confirmed by ¹H NMR, cyclic voltammetry, IR, and single crystal X-ray structure analysis.     

Syntheses and Characterization of a Pair of Isomers of Heteroleptic Bis(Bidentate) Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Two Different Monodentate Ligands

Two isomers of heteroleptic bis(bidentate) ruthenium(II) complexes with dimethyl sulfoxide (dmso) and chloride ligands, trans(Cl,N_bpy)- and trans(Cl,N_Hdpa)-[Ru(bpy)Cl(dmso-S)(Hdpa)]⁺ (bpy: 2,2′-bipyridine; Hdpa: di-2-pyridylamine), are synthesized. This is the first report on the selective synthesis of a pair of isomers of cis-[Ru(L)(L′)XY]ⁿ⁺ (L≠L′: bidentate ligands; X≠Y: monodentate ligands). The structures of the ruthenium(II) complexes are clarified by means of X-ray crystallography, and the signals in the ¹H NMR spectra are assigned based on ¹H–¹H COSY spectra. The colors of the two isomers are clearly different in both the solid state and solution: the trans(Cl,N_bpy) isomer has a deep red color, whereas the trans(Cl,N_Hdpa) isomer is yellow. Although both complexes have intense absorption bands at λ≈440–450 nm, only the trans(Cl,N_bpy) isomer has a shoulder band at λ≈550 nm. DFT calculations indicate that the LUMOs of both isomers are the π* orbitals in the bpy ligand, and that the LUMO level of the trans(Cl,N_bpy) isomer is lower than that of the trans(Cl,N_Hdpa) isomer due to the trans effect of the Cl ligand; thus resulting in the appearance of the shoulder band. The HOMO levels are almost the same in both isomers. The energy levels are experimentally supported by cyclic voltammograms, in which these isomers have different reduction potentials and similar oxidation potentials.     

cis‐ and trans‐Dichloro(3,6‐dihydro‐1,2‐oxazine‐N)(dimethyl sulfoxide‐S)‐platinum(II)

Both the cis, (I), and trans, (II), isomers of the title complex, [PtCl₂(C₄H₇NO)(C₂H₆OS)], possess relatively undistorted square‐planar geometries about the Pt atoms. For (I), cisL—Pt—L angles are in the range 88.8 (2)–91.08 (8)°, while trans angles are 178.61 (8) and 179.4 (2)°. For (II), cisL—Pt—L 86.1 (3)–93.7 (1)°, and transL—Pt—L 175.5 (1) and 179.1 (3)°. The di­methyl sulfoxide (dmso) ligand adopts a normal pyramidal geometry in both complexes. In (I), the S=O bond essentially eclipses the adjacent Pt—N bond, while the oxazine ligand in (I) is twisted so as to avoid steric interactions with the adjacent chloride ligand. By contrast, the dmso ligand in (II) is rotated such that the S=O bond is approximately perpendicular to the square plane, while the oxazine ligand is once again twisted out of the plane by a similar amount as in (I). These are the first structural examples of square‐planar platinum(II) complexes containing a 1,2‐oxazine ligand.     

Preparation, photophysical, and electrochemical properties of two polynuclear Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes containing imidazole-based ligands

A tripodal ligand L¹ and dipodal ligand L² containing imidazole rings have been synthesized by the reaction of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione with 2,2??-bipyridine-4,4??-dicarbaldehyde and 4-methyl-2,2??-bipyridine-4??-carbaldehyde, respectively, in the presence of ammonium acetate. Both ligands have two kinds of nonequivalent coordinating sites: one involving the phenanthroline moiety and the other involving the 2,2??-bipyridine moiety. The Ru(II) complexes, [(bpy)₆Ru₃(L¹)](PF₆)₆ and [(bpy)₄Ru₂(L²)](PF₆)₄ (bpy?=?2,2??-bipyridine), have been obtained by refluxing Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂·2H₂O with each ligand in solution. The two complexes display MLCT absorptions at 465 and 480?nm, respectively, and emission at 665 and 675?nm, respectively, in CH₃CN solution. Electrochemical studies of both complexes show one Ru(II)-centered oxidation at around 1.29?V and three ligand-centered reductions.     

Metal‐catalyzed reversible conversion between chemical and electrical energy designed towards a sustainable society

Proton dissociation of an aqua‐Ru‐quinone complex, [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH₂)]²⁺ (trpy = 2,2′ : 6′,2″‐terpyridine, q = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylquinone) proceeded in two steps (pK_a = 5.5 and ca. 10.5). The first step simply produced [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH)]⁺, while the second one gave an unusual oxyl radical complex, [Ru(trpy)(sq)(O^?.)]⁰ (sq = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylsemiquinone), owing to an intramolecular electron transfer from the resultant O^2? to q. A dinuclear Ru complex bridged by an anthracene framework, [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ (btpyan = 1,8‐bis(2,2′‐terpyridyl)anthracene), was prepared to place two Ru(trpy)(q)(OH) groups at a close distance. Deprotonation of the two hydroxy protons of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ generated two oxyl radical Ru‐O^?. groups, which worked as a precursor for O₂ evolution in the oxidation of water. The [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂](SbF₆)₂ modified ITO electrode effectively catalyzed four‐electron oxidation of water to evolve O₂ (TON = 33500) under electrolysis at +1.70 V in H₂O (pH 4.0). Various physical measurements and DFT calculations indicated that a radical coupling between two Ru(sq)(O^?.) groups forms a (cat)Ru‐O‐O‐Ru(sq) (cat = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylcathechol) framework with a μ‐superoxo bond. Successive removal of four electrons from the cat, sq, and superoxo groups of [Ru₂(btpyan)(cat)(sq)(μ‐O₂^?)]⁰ assisted with an attack of two water (or OH^?) to Ru centers, which causes smooth O₂ evolution with regeneration of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺. Deprotonation of an Ru‐quinone‐ammonia complex also gave the corresponding Ru‐semiquinone‐aminyl radical. The oxidized form of the latter showed a high catalytic activity towards the oxidation of methanol in the presence of base. Three complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CO₂)]⁰ exist as an equilibrium mixture in water. Treatment of [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺ with BH₄^? gave [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)H)]⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CH₂OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(OH₂)]²⁺ with generation of CH₃OH in aqueous conditions. Based on these results, a reasonable catalytic pathway from CO₂ to CH₃OH in electro‐ and photochemical CO₂ reduction is proposed. A new pbn (pbn = 2‐pyridylbenzo[b]‐1,5‐naphthyridine) ligand was designed as a renewable hydride donor for the six‐electron reduction of CO₂. A series of [Ru(bpy)_3‐n(pbn)_n]²⁺ (n = 1, 2, 3) complexes undergoes photochemical two‐ (n = 1), four‐ (n = 2), and six‐electron reductions (n = 3) under irradiation of visible light in the presence of N(CH₂CH₂OH)₃. © 2009 The Japan Chemical Journal Forum and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Chem Rec 9: 169–186; 2009: Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ) DOI 10.1002/tcr.200800039     

A DFT study on the hydrolysis mechanism of NH‐tautomeric antitumors of [HL][trans‐RuCl4L(dmso‐S)]

The hydrolysis process of Ru (III) complex [Htrz][trans‐RuCl₄(1‐H‐1,2,4‐triazole)(dmso‐S)] 1 , a potential antitumor complex similar to the well‐known anticancer agent [ImH][trans‐RuCl₄(Im)(dmso‐S)] (NAMI‐A), has been investigated by using density functional theory (DFT) method, and the solvent effect was also considered and calculated by conductor‐like polarizable calculation model (CPCM). Meanwhile, the hydrolysis process of the NH‐tautomeric isomer, [Htrz][trans‐RuCl₄(4‐H‐1,2,4‐triazole)(dmso‐S)] 2 , was also modeled and predicted by the same methods. The structural characteristics and the detailed energy profiles for the hydrolysis processes of two isomers have been obtained. The analysis of thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics of hydrolysis reaction suggests the following: for the first hydrolysis step, the Complex 1 has lower hydrolysis rate than the reported anticancer drug NAMI‐A, and the result is in accordance with experimental one. However, Complex 1 has obviously higher hydrolysis rate than its isomer Complex 2 , and the result was reasonably explained in theory. For the second hydrolysis step, the formation of cis‐diaqua species is thermodynamic preferred to that of trans isomers. In addition, the trend in nucleophilic attack abilities (A) of hydrolysis products by pertinent biomolecules was revealed and predicted. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2010     

trans‐Di­chloro­tetrakis(4‐methylpyrimidine‐N1)­ruthenium(II)

The title compound, trans‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₄] (mepym is 4‐methylpyrimidine, C₅H₆N₂), obtained from the reaction of trans,cis,cis‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₂(SbPh₃)₂] (Ph is phenyl) with excess mepym in ethanol, has fourfold crystallographic symmetry and has the four pyrimidine bases coordinated through N¹ and arranged in a propeller‐like orientation. The Ru—N and Ru—Cl bond distances are 2.082 (2) and 2.400 (4) Å, respectively. The methyl group, and the N³ and Cl atoms are involved in intermolecular C—H?N and C—­H?Cl hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

Controlling Metal–Ligand–Metal Oxidation State Combinations by Ancillary Ligand (L) Variation in the Redox Systems [L2Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL2]n,boptz=3,6‐bis(2‐oxidophenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine,and L=acetylacetonate, 2,2′‐bipyridine,or 2‐phenylazopyridine

The new compounds [(acac)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(acac)₂] ( 1 ), [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ‐(ClO₄)₂), and [(pap)₂Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru(pap)₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 3 ‐(ClO₄)₂) were obtained from 3,6‐bis(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine (H₂boptz), the crystal structure analysis of which is reported. Compound 1 contains two antiferromagnetically coupled (J=?36.7 cm^?1) Ru^III centers. We have investigated the role of both the donor and acceptor functions containing the boptz^2? bridging ligand in combination with the electronically different ancillary ligands (donating acac^?, moderately π‐accepting bpy, and strongly π‐accepting pap; acac=acetylacetonate, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine pap=2‐phenylazopyridine) by using cyclic voltammetry, spectroelectrochemistry and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for several in situ accessible redox states. We found that metal–ligand–metal oxidation state combinations remain invariant to ancillary ligand change in some instances; however, three isoelectronic paramagnetic cores Ru(μ‐boptz)Ru showed remarkable differences. The excellent tolerance of the bpy co ‐ ligand for both Ru^III and Ru^II is demonstrated by the adoption of the mixed ‐ valent form in [L₂Ru(μ‐boptz)RuL₂]³⁺, L=bpy, whereas the corresponding system with pap stabilizes the Ru^II states to yield a phenoxyl radical ligand and the compound with L=acac^? contains two Ru^III centers connected by a tetrazine radical‐anion bridge.     

Coordination‐Driven Macrocyclization for Locking of Photo‐ and Thermal cis→trans Isomerization of Azobenzene

Both trans and cis isomers of azobenzene‐linked bis‐terpyridine ligand L1 were incorporated in rigid macrocycles linked by Fe^II(tpy)₂ (tpy: terpyridine) units. The complex of the longer trans‐ L1 is dinuclear [(trans‐ L1 )₂ ? Fe^II₂], whereas the complex of the shorter cis‐ L1 is mononuclear [cis‐ L1? Fe^II]. The complex cis‐ L1? Fe^II was not only thermally stable but also photochemically inactive. These results indicate a perfectly locked state of cis‐azobenzene. The stable macrocyclic structure of cis‐ L1? Fe^II causes locking of the isomerization. To the best of our knowledge, this is first example of dual locking of photo‐ and thermal isomerization of cis‐azobenzene.     

Preparation and StructuralCharacterization of RuII‐DMSO and RuIII‐DMSO‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type Phosphotungstates, [PW11O39RuIIDMSO]5– and [PW11O39RuIIIDMSO]4–, and Catalytic Activity for Water Oxidation

Ru^II‐ and Ru^III‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type phosphotungstates with a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligand, [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIDMSO]^5– ( 1 ) and [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIIDMSO]^4– ( 2 ), were synthesized. Compound 1 was prepared by reaction of [PW₁₁O₃₉]^7– with [Ru^II(DMSO)₄]Cl₂ in water at 125 °C under hydrothermal conditions and was isolated as a cesium salt. Compound 2 was prepared by reaction of 1 with bromine in water at 60 °C and was isolated as a cesium salt. The compounds were characterized by cyclic voltammetry, elemental analysis, UV/Vis, IR,³¹P NMR, ¹⁸³W NMR, ¹H NMR, and XANES (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge)spectroscopic methods. Single crystal structural analysis of 1 revealed that Ru^II is incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and coordinated by DMSO through a Ru–S bond. Cyclic voltammetry of 1 indicated that the incorporated Ru^II‐DMSO is reversibly oxidizable to the Ru^III‐DMSO derivative 2 . Compound 1 showed catalytic activity for water oxidation in the presence of cerium ammonium nitrate as an oxidant.     

Synthesis,Spectroscopic, and Electrochemical Properties of Four Novel Trinuclear RuII Polypyridyl Complexes Containing Diazafluorene

Four tripodal ligands L^1–4 derived from 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one were synthesized. L^1–2 formed by the reaction of 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐oxime with 1,3,5‐tris(bromomethyl)benzene, and 1,1,1‐tris(p‐tosyloxymethyl)propane, respectively and L^3–4 formed by the condensation of 9‐(4‐hydroxy)phenylimino‐4,5‐diazafluorene with 1,3,5‐tris(bromomethyl)benzene, and 1,1,1‐tris(p‐tosyloxymethyl)propane, respectively. Four trinuclear complexes [(bpy)₆Ru₃L^1–4](PF₆)₆ ( Ru‐L^1–4 ) were obtained by reaction of Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂ · 2H₂O with ligands L^1–4. The photophysical behaviors of these complexes were investigated by UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrometry. The complexes display metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer absorptions at 441–445 nm and emissions at 571–578 nm. Cyclic voltammetry data of the complexes show one Ru^II‐centered oxidation and three successive ligand‐centered reductions.     

Cationic Heterocycles as Ligands: Synthesis and Reactivity with Anionic Nucleophiles of Cationic Triruthenium Clusters Containing C‐Metalated N‐Methylquinoxalinium or N‐Methylpyrazinium Ligands

The cationic cluster complexes [Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N,C‐L¹Me)]⁺ ( 3 ⁺; HL¹=quinoxaline) and [Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N,C‐L²Me)]⁺ ( 5 ⁺; HL²=pyrazine) have been prepared as triflate salts by treatment of their neutral precursors [Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ‐H)(μ‐κ²N,C‐Lⁿ)] with methyl triflate. The cationic character of their heterocyclic ligands is responsible for their enhanced tendency to react with anionic nucleophiles relative to that of hydrido triruthenium carbonyl clusters that have neutral N‐heterocyclic ligands. These clusters react instantaneously with methyl lithium and potassium tris‐sec‐butylborohydride (K‐selectride) to give neutral products that contain novel nonaromatic N‐heterocyclic ligands. The following are the products that have been isolated: [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ²N,C‐L¹Me₂)] ( 6 ; from 3 ⁺ and methyl lithium), [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ²N,C‐L¹HMe)] ( 7 ; from 3 ⁺ and K‐selectride), [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ²N,C‐L²Me₂)] ( 8 ; from 5 ⁺ and methyl lithium), and [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ‐H)(μ₃‐κ²N,C‐L²HMe)] ( 11 ; from 5 ⁺ and K‐selectride). Whereas the reactions of 3 ⁺ lead to products that arise from the attack of the corresponding nucleophile at the C atom of the only CH group adjacent to the N‐methyl group, the reactions of 5 ⁺ give mixtures of two products that arise from the attack of the nucleophile at one of the C atoms located on either side of the N‐methyl group. The LUMOs and the atomic charges of 3 ⁺ and 5 ⁺ confirm that the reactions of these clusters with anionic nucleophiles are orbital‐controlled rather than charge‐controlled processes. The N‐heterocyclic ligands of all of these neutral products are attached to the metal atoms in nonconventional face‐capping modes. Those of compounds 6 – 8 have the atoms of a ligand C?N fragment σ‐bonded to two Ru atoms and π‐bonded to the other Ru atom, whereas the ligand of compound 11 has a C? N fragment attached to a Ru atom through the N atom and to the remaining two Ru atoms through the C atom. A variable‐temperature ¹H NMR spectroscopic study showed that the ligand of compound 7 is involved in a fluxional process at temperatures above ?93 °C, the mechanism of which has been satisfactorily modeled with the help of DFT calculations and involves the interconversion of the two enantiomers of this cluster through a conformational change of the ligand CH₂ group, which moves from one side of the plane of the heterocyclic ligand to the other, and a 180° rotation of the entire organic ligand over a face of the metal triangle.     

Isomeric Diruthenium Complexes Bridged by Deprotonated Indigo in cis and trans Configuration

The doubly deprotonated form L^2? of indigo=H₂L can bind two [Ru(acac)₂] complex fragments in the cis ( 1 ) and trans configuration ( 2 ), as evidenced from crystal structure analysis. While the latter type of N,O; N ^’ ,O ^’ coordination has been observed earlier, for example, with [Ru(bpy)₂]²⁺, leading to two equivalent six‐membered ring chelates, the cis arrangement in 1 is observed here for the first time in a dinuclear complex, producing one five‐membered ring chelate with N,N ^’ coordination and one seven‐membered chelate with O,O ^’ coordination. The different structures of the isomers result in differing electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical (EPR, UV‐Vis‐NIR) responses for various accessible charge states 1 ⁿ and 2 ⁿ, n=–, 0, +, 2+. The associated electronic structures were analyzed by DFT (structures, spin density) and TD‐DFT calculations (electronic transitions), revealing mainly metal‐based reduction but largely indigo ligand‐based oxidation of both neutral precursors.     

Synthesis,Photophysical, and Electrochemical Properties of RuII Polypyridyl Complexes Bridged with two Tetrapodal Symmetric and one Asymmetric Ligands

Two symmetric tetrapodal ligands L^1–2 and one asymmetric tetrapodal ligand L³ based on 4,5‐diazafluoren have been synthesized and characterized. Ligands L^1–2 formed by the condensation of pentaerythrityl tetratosylate with 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐oxime and 9‐(4‐hydroxy)phenylimino‐4,5‐diazafluorene, respectively. L³ was prepared by two steps, 9‐(4‐hydroxy)phenylimino‐4,5‐diazafluorene reacted with pentaerythrityl tetratosylate affording 1,1′,1"‐tris[(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐ylimino)phenoxymethyl]‐1"′‐(p‐tosyloxymethyl)‐methane, which reacted with 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐oxime affording the asymmetric ligand L³. Three tetranuclear Ru^II complexes [(bpy)₈L^1–3Ru₄](PF₆)₈ (bpy = bipyridine) were obtained by the reaction of Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂ · 2H₂O with ligands L^1–3. Spectroscopic studies of these complexes exhibit metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer absorptions at 440–445 nm and emissions at 575–579 nm. The electrochemical behaviors of these complexes are consistent with one Ru^II‐based oxidation couple and three ligand‐centered reduction couples.     

DFT analysis of the linkage isomerism in penta(ammine)ruthenium(II/III) complexes of benzotriazole: Natural bond orbital method approach and a comprehensive energy decomposition analysis

Penta(ammine)ruthenium benzotriazole complexes [Ru^II/III(NH₃)₅bta]^+/2+ and [Ru^II/III(NH₃)₅btaH]^2+/3+ (bta and btaH are the deprotonated and neutral form of the triazole ligand, respectively) can exhibit two linkage isomers κN1 and κN2. This system was investigated by density functional theory natural bond orbitals analysis and Su-Li energy decomposition analysis. Steric, electrostatic, exchange, repulsion, polarization, and dispersion energy components of the total metal–ligand interaction were quantitatively evaluated, and revealed that the overall metal-triazole ligand is comprised of donor–acceptor interactions like σ-donation and π-back-donation, which favors a specific isomer depending on the oxidation state of the ruthenium and the charge of the ligand. Further, activation energies (ΔG^‡) for linkage isomerization reactions were calculated. Results were correlated with experimental chemical–electrochemical data and two plausible mechanisms are discussed. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A Ruthenium(III)–Oxyl Complex Bearing Strong Radical Character

Proton‐coupled electron‐transfer oxidation of a Ru^II?OH₂ complex, having an N‐heterocyclic carbene ligand, gives a Ru^III?O^. species, which has an electronically equivalent structure of the Ru^IV=O species, in an acidic aqueous solution. The Ru^III?O^. complex was characterized by spectroscopic methods and DFT calculations. The oxidation state of the Ru center was shown to be close to +3; the Ru?O bond showed a lower‐energy Raman scattering at 732 cm^?1 and the Ru?O bond length was estimated to be 1.77(1) Å. The Ru^III?O^. complex exhibits high reactivity in substrate oxidation under catalytic conditions; particularly, benzaldehyde and the derivatives are oxidized to the corresponding benzoic acid through C?H abstraction from the formyl group by the Ru^III?O^. complex bearing a strong radical character as the active species.     

Platinum(II) Mixed Ligand Complexes with Thiourea Derivatives,Dimethyl Sulphoxide and Chloride: Syntheses,Molecular Structures,and ESCA Data

The platinum(II) mixed ligand complexes [PtCl(L^1‐6)(dmso)] with six differently substituted thiourea derivatives HL, R₂NC(S)NHC(O)R′ (R = Et, R′ = p‐O₂N‐Ph: HL¹; R = Ph, R′ = p‐O₂N‐Ph: HL²; R = R′ = Ph: HL³; R = Et, R′ = o‐Cl‐Ph: HL⁴; R₂N = EtOC(O)N(CH₂CH₂)₂N, R′ = Ph: HL⁵) and Et₂NC(S)N=CNH‐1‐Naph (HL⁶), as well as the bis(benzoylthioureato‐κO, κS)‐platinum(II) complexes [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂] have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, FAB(+)‐MS, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR, as well as X‐ray structure analysis ([PtCl(L¹)(dmso)] and [PtCl(L^{3, 4})(dmso)]) and ESCA ([PtCl(L^{1, 2})(dmso)] and [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂]). The mixed ligand complexes [PtCl(L)(dmso)] have a nearly square‐planar coordination at the platinum atoms. After deprotonation, the thiourea derivatives coordinate bidentately via O and S, DMSO bonds monodentately to the Pt^II atom via S atom in a cis arrangement with respect to the thiocarbonyl sulphur atom. The Pt—S‐bonds to the DMSO are significant shorter than those to the thiocarbonyl‐S atom. In comparison with the unsubstituted case, electron withdrawing substituents at the phenyl group of the benzoyl moiety of the thioureate (p‐NO₂, o‐Cl) cause a significant elongation of the Pt—S(dmso)‐bond trans arranged to the benzoyl‐O—Pt‐bond. The ESCA data confirm the found coordination and bonding conditions. The Pt 4f_7/2 electron binding energies of the complexes [PtCl(L^{1, 2})(dmso)] are higher than those of the bis(benzoylthioureato)‐complexes [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂]. This may indicate a withdrawal of electron density from platinum(II) caused by the DMSO ligands.     

Oxidomolybdenum(VI) complexes with atrane-type [O3N] ligands

Dioxomolybdenum(VI) complex [MoO₂Cl₂(dmso)₂] reacts with a series of tetradentate O₃N-type aminoalcohol–bisphenol ligands to form oxomolybdenum(VI) complexes of type [MoOCl(Lⁿ)]. The reaction of H₃L¹ produces [MoOCl(L¹)] as two separable isomers, whereas the reaction of H₃L² or H₃L³ yields a single product. The X-ray analyses of cis- and trans-[MoOCl(L¹)] reveal that the complexes are formed of monomeric molecules. The ligands have tetradentate coordination through three oxygen donors and one nitrogen donor, which is located trans to the terminal oxo group. The sixth coordination site is occupied by a chloro ligand.