Two classes of edge domination in graphs

Let (, resp.) be the number of (local) signed edge domination of a graph G [B. Xu, On signed edge domination numbers of graphs, Discrete Math. 239 (2001) 179-189]. In this paper, we prove mainly that and hold for any graph G of order n(n?4), and pose several open problems and conjectures.     

On edge domination numbers of graphs

Let and be the signed edge domination number and signed star domination number of G, respectively. We prove that holds for all graphs G without isolated vertices, where n=|V(G)|?4 and m=|E(G)|, and pose some problems and conjectures.     

Edge-recognizable domination numbers

For any undirected graph G, let be the collection of edge-deleted subgraphs. It is always possible to construct a graph H from so that . The general edge-reconstruction conjecture states that G and H must be isomorphic if they have at least four edges. A graphical invariant that must be identical for all graphs that can be constructed from the given collection is said to be edge-recognizable. Here we show that the domination number and many of its common variations are edge-recognizable.     

Forwarding and optical indices of a graph

Motivated by wavelength-assignment problems for all-to-all traffic in optical networks, we study graph parameters related to sets of paths connecting all pairs of vertices. We consider sets of both undirected and directed paths, under minimisation criteria known as edge congestion and wavelength count; this gives rise to four parameters of a graph G: its edge forwarding index π(G), arc forwarding index , undirected optical index , and directed optical index .In the paper we address two long-standing open problems: whether the equality holds for all graphs, and whether indices π(G) and are hard to compute. For the first problem, we give an example of a family of planar graphs {G_k} such that . For the second problem, we show that determining either π(G) or is NP-hard.     

On signed cycle domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph, a function f:E→{−1,1} is said to be an signed cycle dominating function (SCDF) of G if ∑_e∈E(C)f(e)≥1 holds for any induced cycle C of G. The signed cycle domination number of G is defined as is an SCDF of G}. In this paper, we obtain bounds on , characterize all connected graphs G with , and determine the exact value of for some special classes of graphs G. In addition, we pose some open problems and conjectures.     

The connectivity of a graph and its complement

Let G be a graph with minimum degree δ(G), edge-connectivity λ(G), vertex-connectivity κ(G), and let be the complement of G.In this article we prove that either λ(G)=δ(G) or . In addition, we present the Nordhaus-Gaddum type result . A family of examples will show that this inequality is best possible.     

Remarks on the minus (signed) total domination in graphs

A function f:V(G)→{+1,0,-1} defined on the vertices of a graph G is a minus total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least 1. The minus total domination number of G is the minimum weight of a minus total dominating function on G. By simply changing “{+1,0,-1}” in the above definition to “{+1,-1}”, we can define the signed total dominating function and the signed total domination number of G. In this paper we present a sharp lower bound on the signed total domination number for a k-partite graph, which results in a short proof of a result due to Kang et al. on the minus total domination number for a k-partite graph. We also give sharp lower bounds on and for triangle-free graphs and characterize the extremal graphs achieving these bounds.     

Full orientability of graphs with at most one dependent arc

Suppose that D is an acyclic orientation of a graph G. An arc of D is dependent if its reversal creates a directed cycle. Let () denote the minimum (maximum) of the number of dependent arcs over all acyclic orientations of G. We call Gfully orientable if G has an acyclic orientation with exactly d dependent arcs for every d satisfying . We show that a connected graph G is fully orientable if . This generalizes the main result in Fisher et al. [D.C. Fisher, K. Fraughnaugh, L. Langley, D.B. West, The number of dependent arcs in an acyclic orientation, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 71 (1997) 73-78].     

Cyclic bandwidth with an edge added

B_c(G) denotes the cyclic bandwidth of graph G. In this paper, we obtain the maximum cyclic bandwidth of graphs of order p with adding an edge as follows: