Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

DPOAE input/output (I/O) functions were measured at 7f2 frequencies (1 to 8 kHz; f2/f1 = 1.22) over a range of levels (-5 to 95 dB SPL) in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. L1-L2 was level dependent in order to produce the largest 2f1-f2 responses in normal ears. System distortion was determined by collecting DP data in six different acoustic cavities. These data were used to derive a multiple linear regression model to predict system distortion levels. The model was tested on cochlear-implant users and used to estimate system distortion in all other ears. At most but not all f2's, measurements in cochlear implant ears were consistent with model predictions. At all f2 frequencies, the ears with normal auditory thresholds produced I/O functions characterized by compressive nonlinear regions at moderate levels, with more rapid growth at low and high stimulus levels. As auditory threshold increased, DPOAE threshold increased, accompanied by DPOAE amplitude reductions, notably over the range of levels where normal ears showed compression. The slope of the I/O function was steeper in impaired ears. The data from normal-hearing ears resembled direct measurements of basilar membrane displacement in lower animals. Data from ears with hearing loss showed that the compressive region was affected by cochlear damage; however, responses at high levels of stimulation resembled those observed in normal ears.     

Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears

A new method for direct pure-tone threshold estimation from input/output functions of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in humans is presented. Previous methods use statistical models relating DPOAE level to hearing threshold including additional parameters e.g., age or slope of DPOAE I/O-function. Here we derive a DPOAE threshold from extrapolated DPOAE I/O-functions directly. Cubic 2 f1-f2 distortion products and pure-tone threshold at f2 were measured at 51 frequencies between f2=500 Hz and 8 kHz at up to ten primary tone levels between L2=65 and 20 dB SPL in 30 normally hearing and 119 sensorineural hearing loss ears. Using an optimized primary tone level setting (L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 dB) that accounts for the nonlinear interaction of the two primaries at the DPOAE generation site at f2, the pressure of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product pDP is a linear function of the primary tone level L2. Linear regression yields correlation coefficients higher than 0.8 in the majority of the DPOAE I/O-functions. The linear behavior is sufficiently fulfilled for all frequencies in normal and impaired hearing. This suggests that the observed linear functional dependency is quite general. Extrapolating towards pDP=0 yields the DPOAE threshold for L2. There is a significant correlation between DPOAE threshold and pure-tone threshold (r=0.65, p<0.001). Thus, the DPOAEs that reflect the functioning of an essential element of peripheral sound processing enable a reliable estimation of cochlear hearing threshold up to hearing losses of 50 dBHL without any statistical data.     

Automated pure-tone threshold estimations from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions

A promising approach to the prediction of pure-tone thresholds through the estimation of DPOAE thresholds by input/output functions was recently published by Boege and Janssen [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810-1818 (2002)]. On the basis of their results, a device that enables automated measurements of these thresholds was recently developed. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability of this instrument for the objective assessment of hearing loss in 101 ears with either normal hearing or with cochlear hearing loss of up to 50 dB HL. The median difference between pure-tone hearing and DPOAE thresholds was approximately 2 dB. For individual subjects, however, DPOAE thresholds differed from pure-tone thresholds by up to 40 dB. We find, therefore, that the clinical benefits of this method are probably limited.     

Maturation of cochlear nonlinearity as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in humans

The growth of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression follows a systematic, frequency-dependent pattern. The pattern is consistent with direct measures of basilar-membrane response growth, psychoacoustic measures of masking growth, and measures of neural rate growth. This pattern has its basis in the recognized nonlinear properties of basilar-membrane motion and, as such, the DPOAE suppression growth paradigm can be applied to human neonates to study the maturation of cochlear nonlinearity. The objective of this experiment was to investigate the maturation of human cochlear nonlinearity and define the time course for this maturational process. Normal-hearing adults, children, term-born neonates, and premature neonates, plus a small number of children with sensorineural hearing loss, were included in this experiment. DPOAE suppression growth was measured at two f2 frequencies (1500 and 6000 Hz) and three primary tone levels (55-45, 65-55, and 75-65 dB SPL). Slope of DPOAE suppression growth, as well as an asymmetry ratio (to compare slope for suppressor tones below and above f2 frequency), were generated. Suppression threshold was also measured in all subjects. Findings indicate that both term-born neonates and premature neonates who have attained term-like age, show non-adult-like DPOAE suppression growth for low-frequency suppressor tones. These age effects are most evident at f2 = 6000 Hz. In neonates, suppression growth is shallower and suppression thresholds are elevated for suppressor tones lower in frequency than f2. Additionally, the asymmetry ratio is smaller in neonates, indicating that the typical frequency-dependent pattern of suppression growth is not present. These findings suggest that an immaturity of cochlear nonlinearity persists into the first months of postnatal life. DPOAE suppression growth examined for a small group of hearing-impaired children also showed abnormalities.     

Simultaneous recording of stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in human ears

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) input-output (I/O) functions were elicited in normal-hearing adults using unequal-frequency primaries in equal-level and fixed-suppressor level (Ls) conditions. Responses were repeatable and similar across a range of primary frequency ratios in the fixed-Ls condition. In comparison to equal-frequency primary conditions [Schairer, Fitzpatrick, and Keefe, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 944-966 (2003)], the unequal-frequency, fixed-Ls condition appears to be more useful for characterizing SFOAE response growth and relating it to basilar-membrane response growth, and for testing the ability to predict audiometric thresholds. Simultaneously recorded distortion-product OAE (DPOAE) I/O functions had higher thresholds than SFOAE I/O functions, and they identified the onset of the nonlinear-distortion mechanism in SFOAEs. DPOAE threshold often corresponded to nonmonotonicities in SFOAE I/O functions. This suggests that the level-dependent nonmonotonicities and associated phase shifts in SFOAE I/O functions were due to varying degrees of cancellation of two sources of SFOAE, such as coherent reflection and distortion mechanisms. Level-dependent noise was observed on-band (at the frequencies of the stimuli) but not off-band, or in the DPOAEs. The variability was observed in ears with normal hearing and ears with cochlear implants. In general, these results indicate the source of the variability is biological, possibly from within the middle ear.     

Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions

Recently, Boege and Janssen [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810-1818 (2002)] fit linear equations to distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output (UO) functions after the DPOAE level (in dB SPL) was converted into pressure (in microPa). Significant correlations were observed between these DPOAE thresholds and audiometric thresholds. The present study extends their work by (1) evaluating the effect of frequency, (2) determining the behavioral thresholds in those conditions that did not meet inclusion criteria, and (3) including a wider range of stimulus levels. DPOAE I/O functions were measured in as many as 278 ears of subjects with normal and impaired hearing. Nine f2 frequencies (500 to 8000 Hz in 1/2-octave steps) were used, L2 ranged from 10 to 85 dB SPL (5-dB steps), and L1 was set according to the equation L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 dB [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)] for L2 levels up to 65 dB SPL, beyond which L1 = L2. For the same conditions as those used by Boege and Janssen, we observed a frequency effect such that correlations were higher for mid-frequency threshold comparisons. In addition, a larger proportion of conditions not meeting inclusion criteria at mid and high frequencies had hearing losses exceeding 30 dB HL, compared to lower frequencies. These results suggest that DPOAE I/O functions can be used to predict audiometric thresholds with greater accuracy at mid and high frequencies, but only when certain inclusion criteria are met. When the SNR inclusion criterion is not met, the expected amount of hearing loss increases. Increasing the range of input levels from 20-65 dB SPL to 10-85 dB SPL increased the number of functions meeting inclusion criteria and increased the overall correlation between DPOAE and behavioral thresholds.     

Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses

Both distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) provide frequency-specific assessment of hearing. However, each method suffers from some restrictions. Hearing losses above 50 dB HL are not quantifiable using DPOAEs and their performance at frequencies below 1 kHz is limited, but their recording time is short. In contrast, ASSRs are a time-consuming method but have the ability to determine hearing thresholds in a wider range of frequencies and hearing losses. Thus, recording DPOAEs and ASSRs simultaneously at their adequate frequencies and levels could decrease the overall test time considerably. The goal of the present study was to develop a parameter-setting and test-protocol to measure DPOAEs and ASSRs binaurally and simultaneously at multiple frequencies. Ten normal-hearing and 23 hearing-impaired subjects participated in the study. The interaction of both responses when stimulated simultaneously at frequencies between 0.25 and 6 kHz was examined. Two limiting factors need to be kept. Frequency distance between ASSR carrier frequency f(c) and DPOAE primary tone f(2) needs to be at least 1.5 octaves, and DPOAEs may not be measured if the ASSR stimulus level is 70 dB SPL or above. There was a significant correlation between pure-tone and DPOAE/ASSR-thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss ears.     

Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were recorded from eight human subjects with mild to moderate cochlear hearing loss, using a frequency spacing of 48 primary pairs per octave and at a level L1 = L2 = 60 dBSPL and with a fixed ratio f2/f1. Subjects with different shapes of hearing thresholds were selected. They included subjects with near-normal hearing within only a limited frequency range, subjects with a notch in the audiogram, and subjects with a mild to moderate high-frequency loss. If the primaries were located in a region of normal or near-normal hearing, but DP frequencies were located in a region of raised thresholds, the distortion product 2 f1-f2 was still observable, but the DP fine structure disappeared. If the DP frequencies fell into a region of normal thresholds, fine structure was preserved as long as DPOAE were generated, even in cases of mild hearing loss in the region of the primaries. These experimental results give further strong evidence that, in addition to the initial source in the primary region, there is a second source at the characteristic place of fDP. Simulations in a nonlinear and active computer model for DPOAE generation indicate different generation mechanisms for the two components. The disappearance of DPOAE fine structure might serve as a more sensitive indicator of hearing impairment than the consideration of DP level alone.     

Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears

Buus and Florentine [J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 120-139 (2002)] have proposed that loudness recruitment in cases of cochlear hearing loss is caused partly by an abnormally large loudness at absolute threshold. This has been called "softness imperception." To evaluate this idea, loudness-matching functions were obtained using tones at very low sensation levels. For subjects with asymmetrical hearing loss, matches were obtained for a single frequency across ears. For subjects with sloping hearing loss, matches were obtained between tones at two frequencies, one where the absolute threshold was nearly normal and one where there was a moderate hearing loss. Loudness matching was possible for sensation levels (SLs) as low as 2 dB. When the fixed tone was presented at a very low SL in an ear (or at a frequency) where there was hearing impairment, it was matched by a tone with approximately the same SL in an ear (or at a frequency) where hearing was normal (e.g., 2 dB SL matched 2 dB SL). This relationship held for SLs up to 4-10 dB, depending on the subject. These results are not consistent with the concept of softness imperception.     

Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments

Two experiments are described in which frequency selectivity was estimated, in simultaneous and forward masking, for each ear of subjects with moderate (25-60 dB HL) unilateral cochlear hearing losses. In both experiments, the signal level was fixed for a given ear and type of masking (simultaneous or forward), and the masker level was varied to determine threshold, using an adaptive, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. In experiment I, the masker was a noise with a spectral notch centered at the signal frequency (either 1.0 or 1.5 kHz); threshold was determined as a function of notch width. Signal levels were chosen so that the noise level required at threshold for a notch width of zero was similar for the normal and impaired ear of each subject in both simultaneous and forward masking. The function relating threshold to notch width had a steeper slope for the normal ear than for the impaired ear of each subject. For the normal ears, these functions were steeper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. This difference was interpreted as resulting from suppression. For the impaired ears, significant differences in the same direction were observed for three of the five subjects, but the differences were smaller. In experiment II, psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were determined in the presence of a fixed notched noise centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz). For the normal ears, the PTCs were sharper in forward masking than in simultaneous masking. For the impaired ears, the PTCs were similar in simultaneous and forward masking, but those in forward masking tended to be sharper at masker frequencies far removed from the signal frequency. Overall, the results suggest that suppression is reduced, but not completely absent in cases of moderate cochlear hearing loss.     

Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions

Evidence of the compressive growth of basilar-membrane displacement can be seen in distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels measured as a function of stimulus level. When the levels of the two stimulus tones (f1 and f2) are related by the formula L1 = 39 dB + 0.4 x L2 [Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)] the shape of the function relating DPOAE level to L2 is similar (up to an L2 of 70 dB SPL) to the classic Fletcher and Munson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 9, 1-10 (1933)] loudness function when plotted on a logarithmic scale. Explicit estimates of compression have been derived based on recent DPOAE measurements from the laboratory. If DPOAE growth rate is defined as the slope of the DPOAE I/O function (in dB/dB), then a cogent definition of compression is the reciprocal of the growth rate. In humans with normal hearing, compression varies from about 1 at threshold to about 4 at 70 dB SPL. With hearing loss, compression is still about 1 at threshold, but grows more slowly above threshold. Median DPOAE I/O data from ears with normal hearing, mild loss, and moderate loss are each well fit by log functions. When the I/O function is logarithmic, then the corresponding compression is a linear function of stimulus level. Evidence of cochlear compression also exists in DPOAE suppression tuning curves, which indicate the level of a third stimulus tone (f3) that reduces DPOAE level by 3 dB. All three stimulus tones generate compressive growth within the cochlea; however, only the relative compression (RC) of the primary and suppressor responses is observable in DPOAE suppression data. An RC value of 1 indicates that the cochlear responses to the primary and suppressor components grow at the same rate. In normal ears, RC rises to 4, when f3 is an octave below f2. The similarities between DPOAE and loudness compression estimates suggest the possibility of predicting loudness growth from DPOAEs; however, intersubject variability makes such predictions difficult at this time.     

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude growth in human adults and neonates

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are thought to be by-products of an active amplification process in the cochlea and thus serve as a metric for evaluating the integrity of this process. Because the cochlear amplifier functions in a level-dependent fashion, DPOAEs recorded as a function of stimulus level (i.e., a DPOAE growth function) may provide important information about the range and operational characteristics of the cochlear amplifier. The DPOAE growth functions recorded in human adults and neonates may provide information about the maturation of these active cochlear processes. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment I included normal-hearing adults and term-born neonates. The 2f1-f2 DPOAE growth functions were recorded for both age groups at three f2 frequencies. Experiment II was an extension of the first experiment but added a subject group of premature neonates. The results of these studies indicate that DPOAE growth functions most often show amplitude saturation and nonmonotonic growth for all age groups. However, premature neonates show monotonic growth and the absence of amplitude saturation more often than adults. Those premature neonates who do show saturation also show an elevated threshold for amplitude saturation relative to adults. In contrast, term neonates are adultlike for most measures except that they show a larger percentage of nonsaturating growth functions than adults. These results may indicate immaturity in cochlear amplifier function prior to term birth in humans. Outer hair cell function and/or efferent regulation of outer hair cell function are hypothesized sources of this immaturity, although some contribution from the immature middle ear cannot be ruled out.     

Quantitative estimation of minor conductive hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig

Subclinical conductive hearing losses (CHLs) can affect otoacoustic emissions and therefore limit their potential in the assessment of the cochlear function. Theoretical considerations to estimate a minor CHL from DPOAE measurements [Kummer et al. (2006). HNO 54, 457-467] are evaluated experimentally. They are based on the fact, that the level difference of the stimulus tones L(1) and L(2) for optimal excitation of the inner ear is given by L(1)=aL(2)+b. A CHL is presumed to attenuate both L(1) and L(2) to the same extent such that excitation of the inner ear is no longer optimal. From the change of L(1) that is necessary to restore optimal excitation of the inner ear and thus to produce maximal DPOAE levels, the CHL can be estimated. In 10 guinea pig ears an experimental CHL was produced, quantified by determination of compound action potential (CAP) thresholds at 8 kHz (CHL(CAP)) and estimated from DPOAE measurements at 8 kHz (CHL(DPOAE)). CHLs up to 12 dB could be assessed. CHL(DPOAE) correlated well with CHL(CAP) (R=0.741, p=0.0142). Mean difference between CHL(DPOAE) and CHL(CAP) was 4.2±2.6 dB. Estimation of minor CHL from DPOAE measurements might help to increase the diagnostic value of DPOAEs.     

Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies

The phase versus frequency function of the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) at 2f(1) - f(2) is approximately invariant at frequencies above 1.5 kHz in human subjects when recorded with a constant f(2)/f(1). However, a secular break from this invariance has been observed at lower frequencies where the phase-gradient becomes markedly steeper. Apical DPOAEs, such as 2f(1)?- f(2), are known to contain contributions from multiple sources. This experiment asked whether the phase behavior of the ear canal DPOAE at low frequencies is driven by the phase of the component from the distortion product (DP) region at 2f(1)?- f(2), which exhibits rapid phase accumulation. Placing a suppressor tone close in the frequency to 2f(1)?- f(2) reduced the contribution of this component to the ear canal DPOAE in normal-hearing adult human ears. When the contribution of this component was reduced, the phase behavior of the ear canal DPOAE was not altered, suggesting that the breaking from DPOAE phase invariance at low frequencies is an outcome of apical-basal differences in cochlear mechanics. The deviation from DPOAE phase invariance appears to be a manifestation of the breaking from approximate scaling symmetry in the human cochlear apex.     

Repeated TTS exposures in monkeys: alterations in hearing, cochlear structure, and single-unit thresholds

The findings of a number of studies investigating the effects of excessive sound on hearing have indicated that the correspondence between behavioral, physiological, and histological measures of noise-induced hearing loss may be markedly dependent upon the sensitivity of the particular measure. Recent studies demonstrating significant changes in the responses of single auditory neurons following brief exposures to pure tones suggest that single-unit activity may be a sensitive indicator of physiological insult to the organ of Corti's sensory cells. In addition, the long-lasting nature of the changes in neural responsiveness suggests that each temporary threshold shift (TTS) episode may produce an increment of damage to the ear that eventually contributes to a measurable permanent threshold shift (PTS). A logical extension of this implication is the proposal that repeated episodes of TTS would first affect single-unit thresholds, and that such damage would eventually manifest itself as PTS. A test of this notion was performed by repeatedly exposing monkeys to short-lasting TTS sounds for many months. Behavioral thresholds were monitored using a reaction-time task before and after each inducement of TTS. Two subjects participated in exposure sessions for 18 months, while the remaining monkey was exposed to identical stimuli for 6 months. At the end of behavioral testing, the monkeys were prepared for chronic recording from single cells of the cochlear nucleus. Following the recording period, cochleas were prepared for examination as plastic-embedded whole mounts. Flat preparations of the cochlear duct were made and the position and extent of damage to the organ of Corti and myelinated nerve fibers were determined. No elevations in behavioral threshold were noted for the monkey receiving 6 months of sound-exposure experience, while for both subjects exposed for 18 months, a significant high-frequency hearing loss became apparent during the final months of exposure. For damaged ears, the thresholds of ipsilateral cochlear nucleus units were elevated for characteristic frequencies (CFs) corresponding to the frequency regions where behavioral thresholds were shifted. Thresholds for units with high-frequency CFs in the animal exposed for 6 months also demonstrated a loss in sensitivity. Histological examination of the cochleas of monkeys with permanent hearing losses revealed corresponding damage to the high-frequency region of the organ of Corti. The monkey exposed for 6 months, which demonstrated only elevated unit thresholds, also had high-frequency lesions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Temporal integration and compression near absolute threshold in normal and impaired ears

The decrease in absolute threshold with increasing stimulus duration (often referred to as "temporal integration") is greater for listeners with normal hearing than for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. It has been suggested that the difference is related to reduced basilar-membrane (BM) compression in the impaired group. The present experiment tested this hypothesis by comparing temporal integration and BM compression in normal and impaired ears at low levels. Absolute thresholds were measured for 4, 24, and 44 ms pure-tone signals, with frequencies (f(s)) of 2 and 4 kHz. The difference between the absolute thresholds for the 4 and 24 ms signals was used as a measure of temporal integration. Compression near threshold was estimated by measuring the level of a 100 ms off-frequency (0.45f(s)) pure-tone forward masker required to mask a 44 ms pure-tone signal presented at sensation levels of 5 and 10 dB. There was a significant negative correlation between amount of temporal integration and absolute threshold. However, there was no correlation between absolute threshold and compression at low levels; both normal and impaired ears showed a nearly linear response. The results suggest that the differences in integration between normal and impaired ears cannot be explained by differences in BM compression.     

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects

The relationship between hearing loss, detected by measuring the audiometric threshold shift, and the presence of long-lasting otoacoustic emissions, has been studied in a population of 66 adult males, by analyzing the cochlear response in the 80 ms following the subministration of a click stimulus. Most long-lasting OAEs are also recognizable as Synchronized Spontaneous OAEs (SSOAEs). The OAE characteristic decay times were evaluated according to the model by Sisto and Moleti [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 1893 (1999)]. The starting hypothesis, confirmed by the results, is that long decay time and large equilibrium amplitude are both manifestations of the effectiveness of the active feedback mechanism. The prevalence and frequency distribution of long-lasting OAEs, and of their SSOAE subset, have been separately analyzed for normal and impaired ears. No long-lasting OAE was found within the hearing loss frequency range, but several were found in impaired ears outside the hearing loss range, both at lower and higher frequencies. This result suggests that the correlation between the presence of long-lasting OAEs and good cochlear functionality be local in the frequency domain. The monitor of the OAE decay time is proposed as a new possible method for early detecting hearing loss in populations exposed to noise.     

Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.

Tone thresholds and speech-reception thresholds were measured in 200 individuals (400 ears) with noise-induced hearing loss. The speech-reception thresholds were measured in a quiet condition and in noise with a speech spectrum at levels of 35, 50, 65, and 80 dBA. The tone audiograms could be described by three principal components: hearing loss in the regions above 3 kHz, from 1 to 3 kHz and below 1 kHz; the speech thresholds could be described by two components: speech reception in quiet and speech reception in noise at 50-80 dBA. Hearing loss above 1 kHz was related to speech reception in noise; hearing loss at and below 1 kHz to speech reception in quiet. The correlation between the speech thresholds in quiet and in noise was only R = 0.45. An adequate predictor of the speech threshold in noise, the primary factor in the hearing handicap, was the pure-tone average at 2 and 4 kHz (PTA2,4, R = 0.72). The minimum value of the prediction error for any tone-audiometric predictor of this speech threshold was 1.2 dB (standard deviation). The prediction could not be improved by taking into account the critical ratio for low-frequency noise nor by its upward spread of masking. The prediction error is due to measurement error and to a factor common to both ears. The latter factor is ascribed to cognitive skill in speech reception. Hearing loss above 10 to 15 dB HL (hearing level) already shows an effect on the speech threshold in noise, a noticeable handicap is found at PTA2,4 = 30 dB HL.     

Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold

A distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curve (STC) shows the minimum level of suppressor tone that is required to reduce DPOAE level by a fixed amount, as a function of suppressor frequency. Several years ago, Mills [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 507-523 (1998)] derived, theoretically, an approximately linear relationship between the tip-to-tail suppressor level difference on a DPOAE STC, and the gain of the cochlear amplifier, defined as the maximum increase in the active over the passive basilar membrane (BM) response. In this paper, preliminary data from adult human subjects are presented that establish a correlation between this tip-to-tail DPOAE STC difference and the threshold of hearing, the latter measured at the frequency of the f2 primary tone. Assuming that both suppression and the DPOAE are by-products of active, nonlinear BM dynamics, the above result suggests that threshold elevation in mild levels of hearing loss may be attributed, in part, to a reduction of cochlear amplifier gain, which is detectable with the suppression paradigm.     

A comparison of underwater hearing sensitivity in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) determined by electrophysiological and behavioral methods

Variable stimulus presentation methods are used in auditory evoked potential (AEP) estimates of cetacean hearing sensitivity, each of which might affect stimulus reception and hearing threshold estimates. This study quantifies differences in underwater hearing thresholds obtained by AEP and behavioral means. For AEP estimates, a transducer embedded in a suction cup (jawphone) was coupled to the dolphin's lower jaw for stimulus presentation. Underwater AEP thresholds were obtained for three dolphins in San Diego Bay and for one dolphin in a quiet pool. Thresholds were estimated from the envelope following response at carrier frequencies ranging from 10 to 150 kHz. One animal, with an atypical audiogram, demonstrated significantly greater hearing loss in the right ear than in the left. Across test conditions, the range and average difference between AEP and behavioral threshold estimates were consistent with published comparisons between underwater behavioral and in-air AEP thresholds. AEP thresholds for one animal obtained in-air and in a quiet pool demonstrated a range of differences of -10 to 9 dB (mean = 3 dB). Results suggest that for the frequencies tested, the presentation of sound stimuli through a jawphone, underwater and in-air, results in acceptable differences to AEP threshold estimates.