Total outer-connected domination numbers of trees

Let G=(V,E) be a graph without an isolated vertex. A set DV(G) is a total dominating set if D is dominating, and the induced subgraph G[D] does not contain an isolated vertex. The total domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. A set DV(G) is a total outer-connected dominating set if D is total dominating, and the induced subgraph G[V(G)−D] is a connected graph. The total outer-connected domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total outer-connected dominating set of G. We characterize trees with equal total domination and total outer-connected domination numbers. We give a lower bound for the total outer-connected domination number of trees and we characterize the extremal trees.     

Broadcasts and domination in trees

A broadcast on a graph G is a function f:V→Z⁺∪{0}. The broadcast number of G is the minimum value of ∑_v∈Vf(v) among all broadcasts f for which each vertex of G is within distance f(v) from some vertex v with f(v)≥1. This number is bounded above by the radius and the domination number of G. We show that to characterize trees with equal broadcast and domination numbers it is sufficient to characterize trees for which all three of these parameters coincide.     

Ratios of some domination parameters in trees

We determine upper bounds on the ratios of several domination parameters in trees.     

A note on Roman domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u∈V-S, there exists a vertex v∈S such that uv∈E. The domination number of G, γ(G), equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. A Roman dominating function on graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V)=∑_v∈Vf(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_R(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, for any integer k(2?k?γ(G)), we give a characterization of graphs for which γ_R(G)=γ(G)+k, which settles an open problem in [E.J. Cockayne, P.M. Dreyer Jr, S.M. Hedetniemi et al. On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22].     

Total domination dot-stable graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. Two vertices of G are said to be dotted (identified) if they are combined to form one vertex whose open neighborhood is the union of their neighborhoods minus themselves. We note that dotting any pair of vertices cannot increase the total domination number. Further we show it can decrease the total domination number by at most 2. A graph is total domination dot-stable if dotting any pair of adjacent vertices leaves the total domination number unchanged. We characterize the total domination dot-stable graphs and give a sharp upper bound on their total domination number. We also characterize the graphs attaining this bound.     

Total restrained domination in trees

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A set S⊆V is a total restrained dominating set if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S and every vertex of V-S is adjacent to a vertex in V-S. The total restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_tr(G), is the smallest cardinality of a total restrained dominating set of G. We show that if T is a tree of order n, then . Moreover, we show that if T is a tree of order , then . We then constructively characterize the extremal trees T of order n achieving these lower bounds.     

Characterizations of trees with equal paired and double domination numbers

A paired-dominating set of a graph G is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching, and a double dominating set is a dominating set that dominates every vertex of G at least twice. We show that for trees, the paired-domination number is less than or equal to the double domination number, solving a conjecture of Chellali and Haynes. Then we characterize the trees having equal paired and double domination numbers.     

On the bounded domination number of tournaments

In a simple digraph, a star of degree t is a union of t edges with a common tail. The k-domination number γ_k(G) of digraph G is the minimum number of stars of degree at most k needed to cover the vertex set. We prove that γ_k(T)=n/(k+1) when T is a tournament with n14k lg k vertices. This improves a result of Chen, Lu and West. We also give a short direct proof of the result of E. Szekeres and G. Szekeres that every n-vertex tournament is dominated by at most lg n−lglg n+2 vertices.     

Lower bounds for the domination number and the total domination number of direct product graphs

A sharp lower bound for the domination number and the total domination number of the direct product of finitely many complete graphs is given: . Sharpness is established in the case when the factors are large enough in comparison to the number of factors. The main result gives a lower bound for the domination (and the total domination) number of the direct product of two arbitrary graphs: γ(G×H)≥γ(G)+γ(H)−1. Infinite families of graphs that attain the bound are presented. For these graphs it also holds that γ_t(G×H)=γ(G)+γ(H)−1. Some additional parallels with the total domination number are made.     

A survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. In this paper, we offer a survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs.     

Domination versus total domination in claw-free cubic graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S. If, in addition, every vertex in S is adjacent to some other vertex in S, then S is a total dominating set. The domination number $\gamma (G)$ of G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G, while the total domination number ${\gamma }_t(G)$ of G is the minimum cardinality of total dominating set in G. A claw-free graph is a graph that does not contain $K_{1,3}$ as an induced subgraph. Let G be a connected, claw-free, cubic graph of order n. We show that if we exclude two graphs, then $\frac{{\gamma }_t(G)}{\gamma (G)}\le \frac{12}{7}$, and this bound is best possible. In order to prove this result, we prove that if we exclude four graphs, then ${\gamma }_t(G)\le \frac{3}{7}n$, and this bound is best possible. These bounds improve previously best known results due to Favaron and Henning (2008) [7], Southey and Henning (2010) [19].     

树的3-彩虹控制数的上界

对树的3-彩虹控制数进行研究,首先用构造法找到直径较小的树的3-彩虹控制数的上界.再通过分类讨论思想和数学归纳法得到一般的阶n大于等于5的树的3-彩虹控制数的上界.     

On the total domination number of cross products of graphs

We give lower and upper bounds on the total domination number of the cross product of two graphs, γ_t(G×H). These bounds are in terms of the total domination number and the maximum degree of the factors and are best possible. We further investigate cross products involving paths and cycles. We determine the exact values of γ_t(G×Pn) and γ_t(C_n×C_m) where P_n and C_n denote, respectively, a path and a cycle of length n.     

Unique response Roman domination in graphs

A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} is a Roman dominating function if every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} with the ordered partition (V₀,V₁,V₂) of V(G), where V_i={v∈V(G)∣f(v)=i} for i=0,1,2, is a unique response Roman function if x∈V₀ implies |N(x)∩V₂|≤1 and x∈V₁∪V₂ implies that |N(x)∩V₂|=0. A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} is a unique response Roman dominating function if it is a unique response Roman function and a Roman dominating function. The unique response Roman domination number of G, denoted by u_R(G), is the minimum weight of a unique response Roman dominating function. In this paper we study the unique response Roman domination number of graphs and present bounds for this parameter.