Nickel-catalyzed C–O/N–H,C–S/N–H,and C–CN/N–H annulation of aromatic amides with alkynes: C–O,C–S,and C–CN activation

The Ni-catalyzed reaction of ortho-phenoxy-substituted aromatic amides with alkynes in the presence of LiO^tBu as a base results in C–O/N–H annulation with the formation of 1(2H)-isoquinolinones. The use of a base is essential for the reaction to proceed. The reaction proceeds, even in the absence of a ligand, and under mild reaction conditions (40 °C). An electron-donating group on the aromatic ring facilitates the reaction. The reaction was also applicable to carbamate (C–O bond activation), methylthio (C–S bond activation), and cyano (C–CN bond activation) groups as leaving groups.

The Ni-catalyzed reaction of ortho-phenoxy-substituted aromatic amides with alkynes in the presence of LiO^tBu as a base results in C–O/N–H annulation with the formation of 1(2H)-isoquinolinones.     

Palladium‐catalyzed selective decarboxylative coupling reaction versus direct C―H arylation for arylation of heteroaromatics

Conditions for selective palladium‐catalyzed decarboxylative 2‐arylation of 3‐substituted thiophene and furan derivatives bearing an ester at C2 position have been established. By using 2 mol% phosphine‐free Pd(OAc)₂ as the catalyst and a mixture of KOH and K₂CO₃ as the bases, in dimethylacetamide, moderate to good yields of the desired 2‐arylated products were obtained. A range of functional groups such as nitrile, nitro, formyl or acetyl on the aryl bromides was tolerated. This method allows us to employ in some cases more convenient reactants in terms of cost or physical properties (boiling point) for arylations. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Photocatalytic C(sp3) radical generation via C–H,C–C,and C–X bond cleavage

C(sp³) radicals (R˙) are of broad research interest and synthetic utility. This review collects some of the most recent advancements in photocatalytic R˙ generation and highlights representative examples in this field. Based on the key bond cleavages that generate R˙, these contributions are divided into C–H, C–C, and C–X bond cleavages. A general mechanistic scenario and key R˙-forming steps are presented and discussed in each section.

C(sp³) radicals (R˙) are of broad research interest and synthetic utility.     

Site-selective functionalization of remote aliphatic C–H bonds via C–H metallation

Directing group assistance provided a paradigm for controlling site-selectivity in transition metal-catalyzed C–H functionalization reactions. However, the kinetically and thermodynamically favored formation of 5-membered metallacycles has greatly hampered the selective activation of remote C(sp³)–H bonds via larger-membered metallacycles. Recent development to achieve remote C(sp³)–H functionalization via the C–H metallation process largely relies on employing specific substrates without accessible proximal C–H bonds. Encouragingly, recent advances in this field have enabled the selective functionalization of remote aliphatic C–H bonds in the presence of equally accessible proximal ones by taking advantage of the switch of the regiodetermining step, ring strain of metallacycles, multiple non-covalent interactions, and favourable reductive elimination from larger-membered metallacycles. In this review, we summarize these advancements according to the strategies used, hoping to facilitate further efforts to achieve site- and even enantioselective functionalization of remote C(sp³)–H bonds.

Recent advances in site-selective functionalization of remote aliphatic C–H bonds in organometallic pathways are summarized.     

EDOT-based conjugated polymers accessed via C–H direct arylation for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production

3,4-Ethylene dioxythiophene (EDOT), as a monomer of commercial conductive poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) (PEDOT), has been facilely incorporated into a series of new π-conjugated polymer-based photocatalysts, i.e., BSO₂–EDOT, DBT–EDOT, Py–EDOT and DFB–EDOT, through atom-economic C–H direct arylation polymerization (DArP). The photocatalytic hydrogen production (PHP) test shows that donor–acceptor (D–A)-type BSO₂–EDOT renders the highest hydrogen evolution rate (HER) among the linear conjugated polymers (CPs) ever reported. A HER up to 0.95 mmol h⁻¹/6 mg under visible light irradiation and an unprecedented apparent quantum yield of 13.6% at 550 nm are successfully achieved. Note that the photocatalytic activities of the C–H/C–Br coupling-derived EDOT-based CPs are superior to those of their counterparts derived from the classical C–Sn/C–Br Stille coupling, demonstrating that EDOT is a promising electron-rich building block which can be facilely integrated into CP-based photocatalysts. Systematic studies reveal that the enhanced water wettability by the integration of polar BSO₂ with hydrophilic EDOT, the increased electron-donating ability by O–C p–π conjugation, the improved electron transfer by D–A architecture, broad light harvesting, and the nano-sized colloidal character in a H₂O/NMP mixed solvent rendered BSO₂–EDOT as one of the best CP photocatalysts toward PHP.

The excellent reactivity toward C–H direct arylation, water wettability and O–C p–π conjugation endow EDOT to be an attractive electron donor unit for CP photocatalysts, yielding an unprecedented hydrogen evolution rate up to 0.95 mmol h⁻¹/6 mg catalyst.     

Ortho C–H arylation of arenes at room temperature using visible light ruthenium C–H activation

A ruthenium-catalyzed ortho C–H arylation process is described using visible light. Using the readily available catalyst [RuCl₂(p-cymene)]₂, visible light irradiation was found to enable arylation of 2-aryl-pyridines at room temperature for a range of aryl bromides and iodides.

A ruthenium-catalyzed ortho C–H arylation process is described using visible light.     

Correction: EDOT-based conjugated polymers accessed via C–H direct arylation for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production

Correction for ‘EDOT-based conjugated polymers accessed via C–H direct arylation for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production’ by Zhi-Rong Tan et al., Chem. Sci., 2022, DOI: 10.1039/d1sc05784g.

The authors regret that incorrect details were cited in the following sections of text from the original article.In the section heading titled ‘Photocatalytic H₂ production and mechanism analysis’, for the sentence ‘Fig. 4b shows that the CPs dispersed in AA/H₂O/NMP exhibit 1.5–44 times higher HER than the dispersions in AA/H₂O/MeOH, which are mainly ascribed to the exfoliation effect in NMP (Fig. S2, S4 and S5†),³⁷ yielding colloidal CPs that possess more exposed active sites and a shorter migration distance of charge carriers compared to their bulk counterparts in MeOH’, the correct version should cite ref. 36 instead of ref. 37. The correct details for this citation are given below as ref. 1.Incorrect details were also given in the section heading titled ‘C–H direct arylation vs. classical Stille coupling’, for the sentence ‘More impressively, the PHP activities of both DArP-derived BSO₂–EDOT and DBT–EDOT are superior to those of their Stille-derived counterparts, i.e., 0.95 vs. 0.91 mmol h⁻¹ for BSO₂–EDOT and St–BSO₂–EDOT, and 0.39 vs. 0.26 mmol h⁻¹ for DBT–EDOT and St–DBT–EDOT (Fig. S13†), which were contrary to our previous results.³⁰,’ the correct version should cite ref. 29 instead of ref. 30. The correct details for this citation are given below as ref. 2.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Ligand-promoted palladium-catalyzed β-methylene C–H arylation of primary aldehydes

The transient directing group (TDG) strategy allowed long awaited access to the direct β-C(sp³)–H functionalization of unmasked aliphatic aldehydes via palladium catalysis. However, the current techniques are restricted to terminal methyl functionalization, limiting their structural scopes and applicability. Herein, we report the development of a direct Pd-catalyzed methylene β-C–H arylation of linear unmasked aldehydes by using 3-amino-3-methylbutanoic acid as a TDG and 2-pyridone as an external ligand. Density functional theory calculations provided insights into the reaction mechanism and shed light on the roles of the external and transient directing ligands in the catalytic transformation.

Aliphatic aldehydes are among the most common structural units in organic and medicinal chemistry research. Direct C–H functionalization has enabled efficient and site-selective derivatization of aliphatic aldehydes.

Simple aliphatic functional groups enrich the skeletal backbones of many natural products, pharmaceuticals, and other industrial materials, influencing the utility and applications of these substances and dictating their reactivity and synthetic modification pathways. Aliphatic aldehydes are some of the most ubiquitous structural units in organic materials.¹ Their relevance in nature and industry alike, combined with their reactivity and synthetic versatility, attracted much attention from the synthetic organic and medicinal chemistry communities over the years (Fig. 1).² Efficient means to the functionalization of these molecules have always been highly sought after.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Select aliphatic aldehyde-containing medicines and biologically active molecules.Traditionally, scientists have utilized the high reactivity of the aldehyde moiety in derivatizing a variety of functional groups by the means of red-ox and nucleophilic addition reactions. The resourceful moiety was also notoriously used to install functional groups at the α-position via condensation and substitution pathways.³ Although β-functionalization is just as robust, it has generally been more restrictive as it often requires the use of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes.^4,5 Hence, transition metal catalysis emerged as a powerful tool to access β-functionalization in saturated aldehydes.⁶ Most original examples of metal-catalyzed β-C–H functionalization of aliphatic aldehydes required the masking of aldehydes into better metal coordinating units since free unmasked aldehydes could not form stable intermediates with metals like palladium on their own.⁷ Although the masking of the aldehyde moiety into an oxime, for example, enabled the formation of stable 5-membered palladacycles, affording β-functionalized products, this system requires the installation of the directing group prior to the functionalization, as well as the subsequent unmasking upon the reaction completion, compromising the step economy and atom efficiency of the overall process.⁸ Besides, some masking and unmasking protocols might not be compatible with select substrates, especially ones rich in functional groups. As a result, the development of a one-step direct approach to the β-C–H functionalization of free aliphatic aldehydes was a demanding target for synthetic chemists.α-Amino acids have been demonstrated as effective transient directing groups (TDGs) in the remote functionalization of o-alkyl benzaldehydes and aliphatic ketones by the Yu group in 2016.⁹ Shortly after, our group disclosed the first report on the direct β-C–H arylation of aliphatic aldehydes using 3-aminopropanoic acid or 3-amino-3-methylbutanoic acid as a TDG.¹⁰ The TDG was found to play a similar role to that of the oxime directing group by binding to the substrate via reversible imine formation, upon which, it assists in the assembly of a stable palladacycle, effectively functionalizing the β-position.¹¹ Since the binding of the TDG is reversible and temporary, it is automatically removed upon functionalization, yielding an efficient and step-economic transformation. This work was succeeded by many other reports that expanded the reaction and the TDG scopes.^12–14 However, this system suffers from a significant restriction that demanded resolution; only substitution of methyl C–H bonds of linear aldehydes was made possible via this approach (Scheme 1a–e). The steric limitations caused by incorporating additional groups at the β-carbon proved to compromise the formation of the palladacycle intermediate, rendering the subsequent functionalization a difficult task.¹²Open in a separate windowScheme 1Pd-catalyzed β-C–H bond functionalization of aliphatic aldehydes enabled by transient directing groups.Encouraged by the recent surge in use of 2-pyridone ligands to stabilize palladacycle intermediates,^15,16 we have successfully developed the first example of TDG-enabled Pd-catalyzed methylene β-C–H arylation in primary aldehydes via the assistance of 2-pyridones as external ligands (Scheme 1f). The incorporation of 2-pyridones proved to lower the activation energy of the C–H bond cleavage, promoting the formation of the intermediate palladacycles even in the presence of relatively bulky β-substituents.¹⁷ This key advancement significantly broadens the structural scopes and applications of this process and promises future asymmetric possibilities, perhaps via the use of a chiral TDG or external ligand or both. Notably, a closely related work from Yu''s group was published at almost the same time.¹⁸We commenced our investigation of the reaction parameters by employing n-pentanal (1a) as an unbiased linear aldehyde and 4-iodoanisole (2a) in the presence of catalytic Pd(OAc)₂ and stoichiometric AgTFA, alongside 3-amino-3-methylbutanoic acid (TDG1) and 3-(trifluoromethyl)-5-nitropyridin-2-ol (L1) at 100 °C (ii) sources proved Pd(OAc)₂ to be the optimal catalyst, while Pd(TFA)₂, PdCl₂ and PdBr₂ provided only moderate yields (entries 10–12). Notably, a significantly lower yield was observed in the absence of the 2-pyridone ligand, and no desired product was isolated altogether in the absence of the TDG (entries 13 and 14). The incorporation of 15 mol% Pd catalyst was deemed necessary after only 55% yield of 3a was obtained when 10 mol% loading of Pd(OAc)₂ was instead used (entry 15).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

Entry	Pd source	L (mol%)	TDG1 (mol%)	Solvent (v/v, mL)	Yield (%)
1	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP	30
2	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	AcOH	<5
3	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP/AcOH (1 : 1)	28
4	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	47
5	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP/AcOH (1 : 9)	<5
6	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	50
7	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (80)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	25
8	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	70(68)b
9	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (75)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	51
10	Pd(TFA)2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	60
11	PdCl2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	52
12	PdBr2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	54
13	Pd(OAc)2	—	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	9
14	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (60)	—	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	0
15c	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	55

Open in a separate window^aReaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), Pd source (15 mol%), AgTFA (0.3 mmol), L1, TDG1, solvent (2.0 mL), 100 °C, 12 h. Yields are based on 1a, determined by ¹H-NMR using dibromomethane as an internal standard.^bIsolated yield.^cPd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%).To advance our optimization of the reaction conditions, a variety of 2-pyridones and TDGs were tested (Scheme 2). Originally, pyridine-2(1H)-one (L2) was examined as the external ligand, but it only yielded the product (3a) in 7% NMR yield. Similarly, other mono- and di-substituted 2-pyridone ligands (L3–L10) also produced low yields, fixating L1 as the optimal external ligand. Next, various α- and β-amino acids (TDG1–10) were evaluated, yet TDG1 persisted as the optimal transient directing group. These amino acid screening results also suggest that a [5,6]-bicyclic palladium species is likely the key intermediate in this protocol since only β-amino acids were found to provide appreciable yields, whereas α-amino acids failed to yield more than trace amounts of the product. The supremacy of TDG1 when compared to other β-amino acids is presumably due to the Thorpe–Ingold effect that perhaps helps facilitate the C–H bond cleavage and stabilize the [5,6]-bicyclic intermediate further.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Optimization of 2-pyridone ligands and transient directing groups.With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, substrate scope study of primary aliphatic aldehydes was subsequently carried out (Scheme 3). A variety of linear primary aliphatic aldehydes bearing different chain lengths provided the corresponding products 3a–e in good yields. Notably, relatively sterically hindered methylene C–H bonds were also functionalized effectively (3f and 3g). Additionally, 4-phenylbutanal gave rise to the desired product 3h in a highly site-selective manner, suggesting that functionalization of the methylene β-C–H bond is predominantly favored over the more labile benzylic C–H bond. It is noteworthy that the amide group was also well-tolerated and the desired product 3j was isolated in 60% yield. As expected, with n-propanal as the substrate, β-mono- (3k1) and β,β-disubstituted products (3k2) were isolated in 22% and 21% yields respectively. However, in the absence of the key external 2-pyridone ligand, β-monosubstituted product (3k1) was obtained exclusively, albeit with a low yield, indicating preference for functionalizing the β-C(sp³)–H bond of the methyl group over the benzylic methylene group.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Scope of primary aliphatic aldehydes. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (15 mol%), AgTFA (0.3 mmol), L1 (60 mol%), TDG1 (60 mol%), HFIP (1.8 mL), HOAc (0.2 mL), 100 °C, 12 h. Isolated yields. ^aL1 (60 mol%) was absent and yields are given in parentheses.Next, substrate scope study on aryl iodides was surveyed (Scheme 4). Iodobenzenes bearing either an electron-donating or electron-withdrawing group at the para-, meta-, or ortho-position were all found compatible with our catalytic system (3l–3ah). Surprisingly, ortho-methyl- and fluoro-substituted aryl iodides afforded the products in only trace amounts. However, aryl iodide with ortho-methoxy group provided the desired product 3ac in a moderate yield. Notably, a distinctive electronic effect pattern was not observed in the process. It should be mentioned that arylated products bearing halogen, ester, and cyano groups could be readily converted to other molecules, which significantly improves the synthetic applicability of the process. Delightfully, aryl iodide-containing natural products like ketoprofen, fenchol and menthol were proven compatible, supplying the corresponding products in moderate yields. Unfortunately, (hetero)aryl iodides including 2-iodopyridine, 3-iodopyridine, 4-iodopyridine and 4-iodo-2-chloropyridine failed to produce the corresponding products. Although our protocol provides a novel and direct pathway to construct β-arylated primary aliphatic aldehydes, the yields of most examples are modest. The leading reasons for this compromise are the following: (1) aliphatic aldehydes are easily decomposed or oxidized to acids; (2) some of the prepared β-arylated aldehyde products may be further transformed into the corresponding α,β-unsaturated aldehydes.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Scope of aryl iodides. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (15 mol%), AgTFA (0.3 mmol), L1 (60 mol%), TDG1 (60 mol%), HFIP (1.8 mL), HOAc (0.2 mL), 100 °C, 12 h. Isolated yields.Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to help investigate the reaction mechanism and to elucidate the role of the ligand in improving the reactivity (Fig. 2). The condensation of the aliphatic aldehyde 1a with the TDG to form imine-1a was found thermodynamically neutral (ΔG° = −0.1 kcal mol⁻¹). As a result, it was permissible to use imine-1a directly in the calculations. According to the calculations results, the precatalyst [Pd(OAc)₂]₃, a trimeric complex, initially experiences dissociation and ligand metathesis with imine-1a to generate the Pd(ii) intermediate IM1, which is thermodynamically favorable by 21.9 kcal mol⁻¹. Consequently, the deprotonated imine-1a couples to the bidentate ligand to form the stable six-membered chelate complex IM1. Therefore, IM1 is indeed the catalyst resting state and serves as the zero point to the energy profile. We have identified two competitive pathways for the Pd(ii)-catalyzed C–H activation starting from IM1, one of which incorporates L1 and another which does not. On the one hand, an acetate ligand substitutes one imine-1a chelator in IM1 to facilitate the subsequent C–H activation leading to IM2, which undergoes C(sp³)–H activation through concerted metalation-deprotonation (CMD) viaTS1 (ΔG^‡ = 37.4 kcal mol⁻¹). However, this kinetic barrier is thought to be too high to account for the catalytic activity at 100 °C. On the other hand, the chelate imine-1a could be replaced by two N-coordinated ligands (L1) leading to the Pd(ii) complex IM3. This process is endergonic by 6.4 kcal mol⁻¹. To allow the ensuing C–H activation, IM3 dissociates one ligand (L1) producing the active species IM4, which undergoes TS2 to cleave the β-C(sp³)–H bond and form the [5,6]-bicyclic Pd(ii) intermediate IM5. Although this step features an energy barrier of 31.2 kcal mol⁻¹, it is thought to be feasible under the experimental conditions (100 °C). Possessing similar coordination ability to that of pyridine, the ligand (L1) effectively stabilizes the Pd(ii) center in the C–H activation process, indicating that this step most likely involves a manageable kinetic barrier. This result explicates the origin of the ligand-enabled reactivity (TS2vs.TS1). Additionally, we considered the γ-C(sp³)–H activation pathway viaTS2′ which was found to have a barrier of 35.5 kcal mol⁻¹. The higher energy barrier of TS2′ compared to that of TS2 is attributed to its larger ring strain in the [6,6]-bicyclic Pd(ii) transition state, which reveals the motive for the site-selectivity. Reverting back to the supposed pathway, upon the formation of the bicyclic intermediate IM5, it undergoes ligand/substrate replacement to afford intermediate IM6, at which the Ar–I coordinates to the Pd(ii) center to enable oxidative addition viaTS3 (ΔG^‡ = 27.4 kcal mol⁻¹) leading to the five-coordinate Pd(iv) complex IM7. Undergoing direct C–C reductive elimination in IM7 would entail a barrier of 29.6 kcal mol⁻¹ (TS4). Alternatively, iodine abstraction by the silver(i) salt in IM7 is thermodynamically favorable and irreversible, yielding the Pd(iv) intermediate IM8 coordinated to a TFA ligand. Subsequently, C–C reductive coupling viaTS5 generates the Pd(ii) complex IM9 and concludes the arylation process. This step was found both kinetically facile (6.1 kcal mol⁻¹) and thermodynamically favorable (30.7 kcal mol⁻¹). Finally, IM9 reacts with imine-1avia metathesis to regenerate the palladium catalyst IM1 and release imine-3a in a highly exergonic step (21.0 kcal mol⁻¹). Ultimately, imine-3a undergoes hydrolysis to yield the aldehyde product 3a and to release the TDG.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Free energy profiles for the ligand-promoted Pd(ii)-catalyzed site-selective C–H activation and C–C bond formation, alongside the optimized structures of the C–H activation transition states TS1 and TS2 (selected bond distances are labelled in Å). Energies are relative to the complex IM1 and are mass-balanced.     

Nickel catalysis enables convergent paired electrolysis for direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds

Convergent paired electrosynthesis is an energy-efficient approach in organic synthesis; however, it is limited by the difficulty to match the innate redox properties of reaction partners. Here we use nickel catalysis to cross-couple the two intermediates generated at the two opposite electrodes of an electrochemical cell, achieving direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds. This method yields a diverse set of diarylmethanes, which are important structural motifs in medicinal and materials chemistry. Preliminary mechanistic study suggests oxidation of a benzylic C–H bond, Ni-catalyzed C–C coupling, and reduction of a Ni intermediate as key elements of the catalytic cycle.

A direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds is achieved by integrating Ni-catalyzed benzyl–aryl coupling into convergent paired electrolysis.

Electrochemical organic synthesis has drawn much attention in recent years.¹ Compared to processes using stoichiometric redox agents, electrosynthesis can potentially be more selective and safe, generate less waste, and operate under milder conditions.^1b In the majority of examples, the reaction of interest occurs at one electrode (anode for oxidation or cathode for reduction), while a sacrificial reaction occurs at the counter electrode to fulfil electron neutrality.^1a,2 Paired electrolysis uses both anodic and cathodic reactions for the target synthesis, thereby maximizing energy efficiency.^1a,3 However, there are comparatively few examples of paired electrolysis for organic synthesis.^1a,3,4Paired electrolysis might be classified into three types: parallel, sequential, and convergent (Fig. 1).^1a,3a In parallel paired electrolysis (Fig. 1a), the two half reactions are simultaneous but non-interfering. In sequential paired electrolysis (Fig. 1b), a substrate is oxidized and reduced (or vice versa) sequentially. In convergent paired electrolysis (Fig. 1c), intermediates generated by the anodic and cathodic processes react with one another to yield the product.^1a,3a,4b,c,5 The activation mode of all three types of paired electrolysis is based on the innate redox reactivity of substrates. As a result, the types of reactions that could be conducted by paired electrolysis remain limited. We proposed a catalytic version of convergent paired electrolysis, where a catalyst is used to cross-couple the two intermediates generated at the two separated electrodes (Fig. 1d). Although mediators have been used in paired electrosynthesis,^3a,4c,6 catalytic coupling of anodic and cathodic intermediates remains largely undeveloped. This mode of action will leverage the power of cross-coupling to electrosynthesis, opening up a wide substrate and product space. Here we report the development of such a process, where cooperative nickel catalysis and paired electrolysis enable direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds (Fig. 1e).Open in a separate windowFig. 1Different types of paired electrolysis: (a) parallel paired electrolysis, (b) sequential paired electrolysis, (c) convergent paired electrolysis, (d) catalytic convergent paired electrolysis and (e) this work.Our method can be used to synthesize diarylmethanes, which are important structural motifs in bioactive compounds,⁷ natural products⁸ and materials.⁹ Direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds has been recognized as an efficient strategy to synthesize diarylmethanes, and methods using metal catalysis¹⁰ and in particular combined photoredox and transition-metal catalysis have been reported.¹¹ Electrosynthesis provides a complementary approach to these methods, with the potential advantages outlined above. The groups of Yoshida¹² and Waldvogel¹³ previously developed synthesis of diarylmethanes via a Friedel–Crafts-type reaction of a benzylic cation and a nucleophile. The benzylic cations were generated by anodic oxidation of benzylic C–H bonds.¹⁴ To avoid the overoxidation of products and to stabilize the very reactive benzylic cations, the reactions had to be conducted in two steps, where the benzylic cations generated in the anodic oxidation step had to be trapped by a reagent. We thought a Ni catalyst could be used to trap the benzyl radical to form an organonickel intermediate, which is then prone to a Ni-catalyzed C–C cross-coupling reaction. Although such a coupling scheme was unprecedented, Ni-catalyzed electrochemical reductive coupling of aryl halides was well established.¹⁵ We were also encouraged by a few recent reports of combined Ni catalysis and electrosynthesis for C–N,¹⁶ C–S,¹⁷ and C–P¹⁸ coupling reactions.We started our investigations using the reaction between 4-methylanisole 1a and 4-bromoacetophenone 2a as a test reaction (Table 1). Direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds was challenging and was typically conducted using toluene derivatives in large excess, e.g., as a solvent.^{11a,b,11d–f} To improve the reaction efficiency, we decided to use only 3 equivalents of 4-methylanisole 1a relative to 2a. After some initial trials, we decided to conduct the reaction in an undivided cell using a constant current of 3 mA. These conditions are straightforward from a practical point of view. After screening various reaction parameters, we found that a combination of 4,4′-dimethoxy-2-2′-bipyridine (L1) and (DME)NiBr₂ as a catalyst, THF/CH₃CN (4 : 1) as a solvent, fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass as an anode and carbon fibre as a cathode gave a 50% GC yield of 1-(4-(4-methoxybenzyl)phenyl)ethanone 3a after 18 h (Table 1, entry 1). Extending the reaction time to 36 h improved the yield to 76% (isolated yield) (entry 2). The target products were formed in a diminished yield with other bipyridine type ligands (entries 3–5). Solvents commonly used in Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, such as DMA and DMF, were less effective (entries 7–8). Replacing carbon fibre by nickel foam or platinum foil as the cathode was detrimental to the coupling, but substantial yields were still obtained (entries 9–10). On the other hand, FTO could not be replaced as the anode. Using carbon fibre as the anode shut down the reaction (entry 11). Likewise, using Pt foil as the anode gave only a 7% GC yield (entry 12). The sensitivity of the reaction outcomes to the electrodes originates from the electrode-dependent redox properties of reaction components (see below). Additional data showing the influence of other reaction parameters such as nickel sources, current, concentration, and electrolytes are provided in the ESI (Table S1, ESI^†).Summary of the influence of key reaction parameters^a

Visible-light-driven palladium-catalyzed Dowd–Beckwith ring expansion/C–C bond formation cascade

A visible-light-induced palladium-catalyzed Dowd–Beckwith ring expansion/C–C bond formation cascade is described. A range of six to nine-membered β-alkenylated cyclic ketones possessing a quaternary carbon center were accessed under mild conditions. Besides styrenes, the electron-rich alkenes such as silyl enol ethers and enamides were also compatible, providing the desired β-alkylated cyclic ketones in moderate to good yields.

An intermolecular Dowd–Beckwith ring expansion/C–C bond formation is achieved through light-induced palladium catalysis. Not only styrenes but also the electron-rich alkenes such as silyl enol ethers and enamides were also compatible in this reaction.     

Understanding the unique reactivity patterns of nickel/JoSPOphos manifold in the nickel-catalyzed enantioselective C–H cyclization of imidazoles

The 3d transition metal-catalyzed enantioselective C–H functionalization provides a sustainable strategy for the construction of chiral molecules. A better understanding of the catalytic nature of the reactions and the factors controlling the enantioselectivity is important for rational design of more efficient systems. Herein, the mechanisms of Ni-catalyzed enantioselective C–H cyclization of imidazoles are investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Both the π-allyl nickel(ii)-promoted σ-complex-assisted metathesis (σ-CAM) and the nickel(0)-catalyzed oxidative addition (OA) mechanisms are disfavored. In addition to the typically proposed ligand-to-ligand hydrogen transfer (LLHT) mechanism, the reaction can also proceed via an unconventional σ-CAM mechanism that involves hydrogen transfer from the JoSPOphos ligand to the alkene through P–H oxidative addition/migratory insertion, C(sp²)–H activation via σ-CAM, and C–C reductive elimination. Importantly, computational results based on this new mechanism can indeed reproduce the experimentally observed enantioselectivities. Further, the catalytic activity of the π-allyl nickel(ii) complex can be rationalized by the regeneration of the active nickel(0) catalyst via a stepwise hydrogen transfer, which was confirmed by experimental studies. The calculations reveal several significant roles of the secondary phosphine oxide (SPO) unit in JoSPOphos during the reaction. The improved mechanistic understanding will enable design of novel enantioselective C–H transformations.

Several unique reactivity patterns of the Ni/JoSPOphos manifold, including facile hydrogen transfer via the two-step oxidative addition/migratory insertion and C(sp²)–H activation via an unconventional σ-CAM mechanism, were disclosed in this work.     

Ruthenium-catalyzed cascade C–H activation/annulation of N-alkoxybenzamides: reaction development and mechanistic insight

A highly selective ruthenium-catalyzed C–H activation/annulation of alkyne-tethered N-alkoxybenzamides has been developed. In this reaction, diverse products from inverse annulation can be obtained in moderate to good yields with high functional group compatibility. Insightful experimental and theoretical studies indicate that the reaction to the inverse annulation follows the Ru(ii)–Ru(iv)–Ru(ii) pathway involving N–O bond cleavage prior to alkyne insertion. This is highly different compared to the conventional mechanism of transition metal-catalyzed C–H activation/annulation with alkynes, involving alkyne insertion prior to N–O bond cleavage. Via this pathway, the in situ generated acetic acid from the N–H/C–H activation step facilitates the N–O bond cleavage to give the Ru-nitrene species. Besides the conventional mechanism forming the products via standard annulation, an alternative and novel Ru(ii)–Ru(iv)–Ru(ii) mechanism featuring N–O cleavage preceding alkyne insertion has been proposed, affording a new understanding of transition metal-catalyzed C–H activation/annulation.

A highly selective ruthenium-catalyzed C–H activation/annulation through a pathway involving N–O bond cleavage prior to alkyne insertion is developed.     

Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of benzocyclobutenols and cyclobutanols via a sequential reduction/C–H functionalization

We report here a sequential enantioselective reduction/C–H functionalization to install contiguous stereogenic carbon centers of benzocyclobutenols and cyclobutanols. This strategy features a practical enantioselective reduction of a ketone and a diastereospecific iridium-catalyzed C–H silylation. Further transformations have been explored, including controllable regioselective ring-opening reactions. In addition, this strategy has been utilized for the synthesis of three natural products, phyllostoxin (proposed structure), grandisol and fragranol.

We report here a sequential enantioselective reduction/C–H functionalization to install contiguous stereogenic carbon centers of benzocyclobutenols and cyclobutanols.

Molecules with inherent ring strain have gained considerable interest in the synthetic community.¹ Among them, four-membered ring molecules have been recognized as powerful building blocks in organic synthesis.² Driven by ring strain releasing, the reactions of carbon–carbon bond cleavage have been extensively studied in recent years.³ Meanwhile, cyclobutane motifs represent important structural units in natural product and bioactive molecules as well (Scheme 1).⁴ Therefore, a general and robust method to constitute four-membered ring derivatives is of great value, especially in an enantiomerically pure form.⁵Open in a separate windowScheme 1Representative cyclobutane-containing bioactive molecules.[2 + 2]-Cycloaddition⁶ and the skeleton rearrangement reaction⁷ are two primary methods to prepare chiral cyclobutane derivatives. Recently, the precision modification of four-membered ring skeletons to access enantioenriched cyclobutane derivatives has attracted emerging attention. Several strategies have been developed, including allylic alkylation,⁸ α-functionalization,⁹ conjugate addition¹⁰ and C–H functionalization¹¹ of prochiral or racemic cyclobutane derivatives (Scheme 2a).¹² However, the enantioselective synthesis of chiral benzocyclobutene derivatives is still underdeveloped.¹³ Although two efficient palladium-catalyzed C–H activation strategies have been developed by Baudoin¹⁴ and Martin¹⁵ groups via similar intermediate five-membered palladacycles, no enantioenriched benzocyclobutene derivative has been prepared by employing the above two methods. In 2017, Kawabata reported an elegant example of asymmetric intermolecular α-arylation of enantioenriched amino acid derivatives to afford benzocyclobutenones with tetrasubstituted carbon via memory of chirality (Scheme 2b).¹⁶ In 2018, Zhang reported an iridium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of α-alkylidene benzocyclobutenones in good enantioselectivities (3 examples, 83–88% ee).^12c To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on enantioselective synthesis of benzocyclobutene derivatives with all-carbon quaternary centers.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Asymmetric synthesis of cyclobutanes and their derivatives. (a) Enantioselective functionalization of four-membered ring substrates. (b) Synthesis of chiral benzocyclobutenone via memory of chirality. (c) This work: sequential enantioselective reduction/C–H functionalization.In line with our continued interest in precision modification of four-membered ring skeletons,^9d,10c,12a we initiated our studies on the synthesis of chiral benzocyclobutenes via enantioselective functionalization of highly strained benzocyclobutenones. It is well known that benzocyclobutene derivatives are labile to undergo a ring-opening reaction to release their inherent ring strains.¹⁷ Therefore, it is a challenging task to modify the benzocyclobutenone and preserve the four-membered ring skeleton at the same time. We envisioned that a carbonyl group directed C–H functionalization¹⁸ of the gem-dimethyl group could furnish enantioenriched α-quaternary benzocyclobutenones (Scheme 2c). This could be viewed as an alternative approach to achieve the alkylation of benzocyclobutenone, which was otherwise directly inaccessible using enolate chemistry through the unstable anti-aromatic intermediate.¹⁹ In addition, a highly regioselective C–H activation would be required to functionalize the methyl group instead of the aryl ring. Here we report our work on sequential enantioselective reduction and intramolecular C–H silylation to provide enantioenriched benzocyclobutenols and cyclobutanols with all-carbon quaternary centers. The excellent diastereoselectivity and regioselectivity of silylation were attributed to rigid structural organization of the 4/5 fused ring. Furthermore, this strategy has been utilized to accomplish the total synthesis of natural products phyllostoxin (proposed structure), grandisol and fragranol.We commenced our studies with enantioselective reduction of readily prepared dimethylbenzocyclobutenone 1a (Scheme 3).^15,20 Surprisingly, enantioselective reduction of the carbonyl group of cyclobutanone derivatives received little attention. The first reduction of parent benzocyclobutenone was studied in 1996 by Kündig using chlorodiisopinocamphenylborane²¹ or chiral oxazaborolidines (CBS reduction),²² and only moderate enantioselectivity (44–68% ee) was obtained.²³ Although copper-catalyzed asymmetric hydrosilylation of benzocyclobutenone 1a using CuCl/(R)-BINAP gave the benzocyclobutenol ent-2a in 88% ee, optimization of ligands gave no further improvement (Scheme 3a, see Tables S1–S4^† for details).²⁴ Gladly, excellent enantioselective reduction could be achieved in 94% yield and 97% ee under Noyori''s asymmetric transfer hydrogenation conditions (Scheme 3b, conditions A, RuCl[(S,S)-Tsdpen](p-cymene)).²⁵ The product 2a showed remarkable stability and no ring-opening byproduct 2a′ was observed. The reduction of parent benzocyclobutenone was examined under conditions A, and benzocyclobutenol was obtained in 90% yield and 81% ee. Apparently, the steric influence imposed by the α-dimethyl group enhanced the enantioselectivity of the reduction. Similarly, the CBS reduction ((S)-B–Me) of benzocyclobutenone 1a gave better results compared with parent benzocyclobutenone, affording the product 2a in 86% yield and 92% ee (Scheme 3c).Open in a separate windowScheme 3Enantioselective reduction of benzocyclobutenone 1a. (a) Copper hydride reduction. (b) Ru-catalyzed asymmetric transfer hydrogenation. (c) CBS reduction.We then examined the substrate scope of the reduction reaction (26 was chosen to improve the yield and enantioselectivity. Besides, benzocyclobutenol 2g with nitro substitution could be obtained in 96% yield and 93% ee. Treatment of pyrrolidinyl substituted benzocycobutenone 1h with catalyst (S,S)-Ts-DENEB afforded desired product 2h in 49% yield and 89% ee, together with ring-opening product 2h′ (18%).Enantioselective reduction of benzocyclobutenones^a

Palladium-catalyzed synthesis of β-hydroxy compounds via a strained 6,4-palladacycle from directed C–H activation of anilines and C–O insertion of epoxides

A palladium-catalyzed C–H activation of acetylated anilines (acetanilides, 1,1-dimethyl-3-phenylurea, 1-phenylpyrrolidin-2-one, and 1-(indolin-1-yl)ethan-1-one) with epoxides using O-coordinating directing groups was accomplished. This C–H alkylation reaction proceeds via formation of a previously unknown 6,4-palladacycle intermediate and provides rapid access to regioselectively functionalized β-hydroxy products. Notably, this catalytic system is applicable for the gram scale mono-functionalization of acetanilide in good yields. The palladium-catalyzed coupling reaction of the ortho-C(sp²) atom of O-coordinating directing groups with a C(sp³) carbon of chiral epoxides offers diverse substrate scope in good to excellent yields. In addition, further transformations of the synthesized compound led to biologically important heterocycles. Density functional theory reveals that the 6,4-palladacycle leveraged in this work is significantly more strained (>10 kcal mol⁻¹) than the literature known 5,4 palladacycles.

The combined experimental and computational study on palladium-catalyzed regioselective C–H functionalization of O-coordinating directing groups with epoxides is described.     

Kinetic resolution of sulfur-stereogenic sulfoximines by Pd(ii)–MPAA catalyzed C–H arylation and olefination

A direct Pd(ii)-catalyzed kinetic resolution of heteroaryl-enabled sulfoximines through an ortho-C–H alkenylation/arylation of arenes has been developed. The coordination of the sulfoximine pyridyl-motif and the chiral amino acid MPAA ligand to the Pd(ii)-catalyst controls the enantio-discriminating C(aryl)–H activation. This method provides access to a wide range of enantiomerically enriched unreacted aryl-pyridyl-sulfoximine precursors and C(aryl)–H alkenylation/arylation products in good yields with high enantioselectivity (up to >99% ee), and selectivity factor up to >200. The coordination preference of the directing group, ligand effect, geometry constraints, and the transient six-membered concerted-metalation–deprotonation species dictate the stereoselectivity; DFT studies validate this hypothesis.

A Pd/MPAA catalysed KR of heteroaryl substituted sulfoximines through C–H alkenylation and arylation (up to >99% ee) is developed. In-depth DFT studies uncover the salient features.     

Pd-catalyzed cross-electrophile Coupling/C–H alkylation reaction enabled by a mediator generated via C(sp3)–H activation

Transition-metal-catalyzed cross-electrophile C(sp²)–(sp³) coupling and C–H alkylation reactions represent two efficient methods for the incorporation of an alkyl group into aromatic rings. Herein, we report a Pd-catalyzed cascade cross-electrophile coupling and C–H alkylation reaction of 2-iodo-alkoxylarenes with alkyl chlorides. Methoxy and benzyloxy groups, which are ubiquitous functional groups and common protecting groups, were utilized as crucial mediators via primary or secondary C(sp³)–H activation. The reaction provides an innovative and convenient access for the synthesis of alkylated phenol derivatives, which are widely found in bioactive compounds and organic functional materials.

A cascade Pd-catalyzed cross-electrophile coupling and C–H alkylation reaction of 2-iodo-alkoxylarenes with alkyl chlorides has been developed by using an ortho-methoxy or benzyloxy group as a mediator via C(sp³)–H activation.     

Rapid Access to 2,2′‐Bithiazole‐Based Copolymers via Sequential Palladium‐Catalyzed C–H/C–X and C–H/C–H Coupling Reactions

A rapid access to 2,2′‐bithiazole‐based copolymers has been developed on the basis of the sequential palladium‐catalyzed C H/C X and C H/C H coupling reactions. To assemble a “copolymer” through homopolymerization, a type of symmetric A‐B‐A‐type building block is designed as the monomer and prepared via the regioselective C5 H arylation of thiazole. A PdCl₂/CuCl‐cocatalyzed oxidative C H/C H homopolymerization has been established to afford the 2,2′‐bithiazole‐based copolymers with high M_n (up to 69400). The current protocol features atom‐ and step‐economy and exhibits a potential in the highly efficient construction of conjugated copolymers.

     

Dual ligand approach increases functional group tolerance in the Pd-catalysed C–H arylation of N-heterocyclic pharmaceuticals

The excellent functional group tolerance of the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactions has been decisive for their success in the pharmaceutical industry. Highly diversified (hetero)aromatic scaffolds can be effectively coupled in the final step(s) of a convergent synthetic route. In contrast, electrophilic Pd catalysts for non-directed C–H activation are particularly sensitive to inhibition by coordinating groups in pharmaceutical precursors. While C–H arylation enables the direct conversion of (hetero)aromatics without preinstalled functional or directing groups, its functional group tolerance should be increased to be viable in late-stage cross-couplings. In this work, we report on a dual ligand approach that combines a strongly coordinating phosphine ligand with a chelating 2-hydroxypyridine for the highly robust C–H coupling of bicyclic N-heteroaromatics with aryl bromide scaffolds. The catalyst speciation was studied via in situ XAS measurements, confirming the coordination of both ligands under the reaction conditions. The C–H activation catalyst was shown to be tolerant to a wide range of pharmaceutically relevant scaffolds, including examples of late-stage functionalization of known drug molecules.

Ligand combination of a 2-pyridone with traditional phosphines enables superior functional group tolerance in the C–H (hetero)arylation of pharmaceutically relevant N-heterocyclic scaffolds.     

Recent Strategies in Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Sequential C–H Activation/Annulation for One-Step Construction of Functionalized Indazole Derivatives

Designing new synthetic strategies for indazoles is a prominent topic in contemporary research. The transition-metal-catalyzed C–H activation/annulation sequence has arisen as a favorable tool to construct functionalized indazole derivatives with improved tolerance in medicinal applications, functional flexibility, and structural complexity. In the current review article, we aim to outline and summarize the most common synthetic protocols to use in the synthesis of target indazoles via a transition-metal-catalyzed C–H activation/annulation sequence for the one-step synthesis of functionalized indazole derivatives. We categorized the text according to the metal salts used in the reactions. Some metal salts were used as catalysts, and others may have been used as oxidants and/or for the activation of precatalysts. The roles of some metal salts in the corresponding reaction mechanisms have not been identified. It can be expected that the current synopsis will provide accessible practical guidance to colleagues interested in the subject.