Parameterization of charge model 3 for AM1, PM3, BLYP,and B3LYP

We have recently developed a new Class IV charge model for calculating partial atomic charges in molecules. The new model, called Charge Model 3 (CM3), was parameterized for calculations on molecules containing H, Li, C, N, O, F, Si, S, P, Cl, and Br by Hartree-Fock theory and by hybrid density functional theory (DFT) based on the modified Perdew-Wang density functional with several basis sets. In the present article we extend CM3 to semiempirical molecular orbital theory, in particular Austin Model 1 (AM1) and Parameterized Model 3 (PM3), and to the popular BLYP and B3LYP DFT and hybrid DFT methods, respectively. For the BLYP extension, we consider the 6-31G(d) basis set, and for the B3LYP extension, we consider three basis sets: 6-31G(d), 6-31+G(d), and MIDI!6D. We begin with the previous CM3 strategy, which involves 34 parameters for 30 pairs of elements. We then refine the model to improve the charges in compounds that contain N and O. This modification, involving two new parameters, leads to improved dipole moments for amides, bifunctional H, C, N, O compounds, aldehydes, ketones, esters, and carboxylic acids; the improvement for compounds not containing N results from obtaining more physical parameters for carbonyl groups when the O=C-N conjugation of amides is addressed in the parameterization. In addition, for the PM3 method, we added an additional parameter to improve dipole moments of compounds that contain bonds between C and N. This additional parameter leads to improved accuracy in the dipole moments of aromatic nitrogen heterocycles with five-membered rings.     

Accurate partial atomic charges for high-energy molecules using class IV charge models with the MIDI! basis set

We have recently developed a new class IV charge model for calculating partial atomic charges in molecules. The new model, called charge model 3 (CM3), was parameterized for calculations on molecules containing H, Li, C, N, O, F, Si, S, P, Cl, and Br by Hartree–Fock theory and by hybrid density functional theory (HDFT) based on the modified Perdew–Wang density functional with several basis sets. In the present article, we extend CM3 for calculating partial atomic charges by Hartree–Fock theory with the economical but well balanced MIDI! basis set. Then, using a test set of accurate dipole moments for molecules containing nitramine functional groups (which include many high-energy materials), we demonstrate the utility of several parameters designed to improve the charges in molecules containing both N and O atoms. We also show that one of our most recently developed CM3 models that is designed for use with wave functions calculated at the mPWXPW91/MIDI! level of theory (where X denotes a variable percentage of Hartree–Fock exchange) gives accurate charge distributions in nitramines without additional parameters for N and O. To demonstrate the reliability of partial atomic charges calculated with CM3, we use these atomic charges to calculate polarization free energies for several nitramines, including the commonly used explosives 1,3,5-trinitro-s-triazine (RDX) and 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (HNIW), in nitromethane. These polarization energies are large and negative, indicating that electrostatic interactions between the charge distribution of the molecule and the solvent make a large contribution to the free energy of solvation of nitramines. By extension, the same conclusion should apply to solid-state condensation. Also, in contrast to some other charge models, CM3 yields atomic charges that are relatively insensitive to the presence of buried atoms and small conformational changes in the molecule, as well as to the level of treatment of electron correlation. This type of charge model should be useful in the future development of solvation models and force fields designed to estimate intramolecular interactions of nitramines in the condensed phase.     

The natural atomic orbital point charge model for PM3: Multipole moments and molecular electrostatic potentials

The natural atomic orbital/point (NAO-PC) model originally developed to calculate molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) and multiple moments based on the AM1 wave function has been extended to PM3. As for AM1, NAO-PC/PM3 reproduces dipole moments calculated by the standard PM3 method very well. There is also a surprisingly good correlation between experimental and calculated quadrupole moments. The MEPs calculated using PM3/NAO-PC are found to be in better agreement with those given by RHF/6-31G* than those obtained from the PM3 wave function using Coulson charges. On the other hand, the NAO-PC model is often slightly worse then the method implemented in MOPAC-ESP. The MEPs calculated using our model based on the PM3 wave function are often in better agreement with those given by RHF/6-31G* than those obtain with AM1. © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Accuracy of free energies of hydration using CM1 and CM3 atomic charges

Absolute free energies of hydration (DeltaGhyd) have been computed for 25 diverse organic molecules using partial atomic charges derived from AM1 and PM3 wave functions via the CM1 and CM3 procedures of Cramer, Truhlar, and coworkers. Comparisons are made with results using charges fit to the electrostatic potential surface (EPS) from ab initio 6-31G* wave functions and from the OPLS-AA force field. OPLS Lennard-Jones parameters for the organic molecules were used together with the TIP4P water model in Monte Carlo simulations with free energy perturbation theory. Absolute free energies of hydration were computed for OPLS united-atom and all-atom methane by annihilating the solutes in water and in the gas phase, and absolute DeltaGhyd values for all other molecules were computed via transformation to one of these references. Optimal charge scaling factors were determined by minimizing the unsigned average error between experimental and calculated hydration free energies. The PM3-based charge models do not lead to lower average errors than obtained with the EPS charges for the subset of 13 molecules in the original study. However, improvement is obtained by scaling the CM1A partial charges by 1.14 and the CM3A charges by 1.15, which leads to average errors of 1.0 and 1.1 kcal/mol for the full set of 25 molecules. The scaled CM1A charges also yield the best results for the hydration of amides including the E/Z free-energy difference for N-methylacetamide in water.     

RM1: a reparameterization of AM1 for H, C, N, O, P, S, F, Cl, Br, and I

Twenty years ago, the landmark AM1 was introduced, and has since had an increasingly wide following among chemists due to its consistently good results and time-tested reliability--being presently available in countless computational quantum chemistry programs. However, semiempirical molecular orbital models still are of limited accuracy and need to be improved if the full potential of new linear scaling techniques, such as MOZYME and LocalSCF, is to be realized. Accordingly, in this article we present RM1 (Recife Model 1): a reparameterization of AM1. As before, the properties used in the parameterization procedure were: heats of formation, dipole moments, ionization potentials and geometric variables (bond lengths and angles). Considering that the vast majority of molecules of importance to life can be assembled by using only six elements: C, H, N, O, P, and S, and that by adding the halogens we can now build most molecules of importance to pharmaceutical research, our training set consisted of 1736 molecules, representative of organic and biochemistry, containing C, H, N, O, P, S, F, Cl, Br, and I atoms. Unlike AM1, and similar to PM3, all RM1 parameters have been optimized. For enthalpies of formation, dipole moments, ionization potentials, and interatomic distances, the average errors in RM1, for the 1736 molecules, are less than those for AM1, PM3, and PM5. Indeed, the average errors in kcal x mol(-1) of the enthalpies of formation for AM1, PM3, and PM5 are 11.15, 7.98, and 6.03, whereas for RM1 this value is 5.77. The errors, in Debye, of the dipole moments for AM1, PM3, PM5, and RM1 are, respectively, 0.37, 0.38, 0.50, and 0.34. Likewise, the respective errors for the ionization potentials, in eV, are 0.60, 0.55, 0.48, and 0.45, and the respective errors, in angstroms, for the interatomic distances are 0.036, 0.029, 0.037, and 0.027. The RM1 average error in bond angles of 6.82 degrees is only slightly higher than the AM1 figure of 5.88 degrees, and both are much smaller than the PM3 and PM5 figures of 6.98 degrees and 9.83 degrees, respectively. Moreover, a known error in PM3 nitrogen charges is corrected in RM1. Therefore, RM1 represents an improvement over AM1 and its similar successor PM3, and is probably very competitive with PM5, which is a somewhat different model, and not fully disclosed. RM1 possesses the same analytical construct and the same number of parameters for each atom as AM1, and, therefore, can be easily implemented in any software that already has AM1, not requiring any change in any line of code, with the sole exception of the values of the parameters themselves.     

Atomic charges derived from a fast and accurate method for electrostatic potentials based on modified AM1 calculations

Atomic charges derived from a recently described approach to the very rapid computation of AM1 electrostatic potentials (ESP) accurately parallel, but are ca. 20% smaller than, the corresponding HF/6-31G* values. The dipole moments computed from the AM1 charges are virtually identical to those derived directly from the wave function and in rather better agreement with the experimental values than those computed using the HF/6-31G* charges. Unlike other approaches to the semiempirical calculation of ESP-derived charges, the present method also yields near HF/6-31G* quality potentials close to the molecular periphery. For medium-sized organic molecules (40-100 basis functions), the method is approximately two orders of magnitude faster than those involving prior deorthogonalization of AM1 wave function and explicit computation of the full ESP integral matrix. © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

IR spectra of N-methylacetamide in water predicted by combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulations

We applied the combined quantum mechanical (QM)/molecular mechanical (MM) molecular dynamics (MD) simulation method in assessing IR spectra of N-methylacetamide and its deuterated form in aqueous solutions. The model peptide is treated at the Austin Model 1 (AM1) level and the induced dipole effects by the solvent are incorporated in fluctuating solute dipole moments, which are calculated using partial charges from Mulliken population analyses without resorting to any available high-level ab initio dipole moment data. Fourier transform of the solute dipole autocorrelation function produces in silico IR spectra, in which the relative peak intensities and bandwidths of major amide bands are quantitatively compatible with experimental results only when both geometric and electronic polarizations of the peptide by the solvent are dealt with at the same quantum-mechanical level. We cast light on the importance of addressing dynamic charge fluctuations of the solute in calculating IR spectra by comparing classical and QM/MM MD simulation results. We propose the adjustable scaling factors for each amide mode to be directly compared with experimental data.     

PM3-SM3: A general parameterization for including aqueous solvation effects in the PM3 molecular orbital model

Our recently proposed scheme for including aqueous solvation free energies in parameterized NDDO SCF models is extended to the Parameterized Model 3 semiempirical Hamiltonian. The solvation model takes accurate account of the hydrophobic effect for hydrocarbons, as well as electric polarization of the solvent, the free energy of cavitation, and dispersion interactions. Eight heteroatoms are included (along with H and C), and the new model is parameterized accurately for the water molecule itself, which allows meaningful treatments of specifically hydrogen bonded water molecules. The unphysical partial charges on nitrogen atoms predicted by the Parameterized Model 3 Hamiltonian limit the accuracy of the predicted solvation energies for some compounds containing nitrogen, but the model may be very useful for other systems, especially those for which PM3 is preferred over AM1 for the solute properties of the particular system under study. © 1992 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

AM1-SM2 and PM3-SM3 parameterized SCF solvation models for free energies in aqueous solution

Summary Two new continuum solvation models have been presented recently, and in this paper they are explained and reviewed in detail with further examples. Solvation Model 2 (AM1-SM2) is based on the Austin Model 1 and Solvation Model 3 (PM3-SM3) on the Parameterized Model 3 semiempirical Hamiltonian. In addition to the incorporation of phosphorus parameters, both of these new models address specific deficiencies in the original Solvation Model 1 (AM1-SM1), viz., (1) more accurate account is taken of the hydrophobic effect of hydrocarbons, (2) assignment of heavy-atom surface tensions is based on the presence or absence of bonded hydrogen atoms, and (3) the treatment of specific hydration-shell water molecules is more consistent. The new models offer considerably improved performance compared to AM1-SM1 for neutral molecules and essentially equivalent performance for ions. The solute charges within the Parameterized Model 3 Hamiltonian limit the utility of PM3-SM3 for compounds containing nitrogen and possibly phosphorus. For other systems both AM1-SM2 and PM3-SM3 give realistic results, but AM1-SM2 in general outperforms PM3-SM3. Key features of the models are discussed with respect to alternative approaches.     

Fast,efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation

We present the first global parameterization and validation of a novel charge model, called AM1-BCC, which quickly and efficiently generates high-quality atomic charges for computer simulations of organic molecules in polar media. The goal of the charge model is to produce atomic charges that emulate the HF/6-31G* electrostatic potential (ESP) of a molecule. Underlying electronic structure features, including formal charge and electron delocalization, are first captured by AM1 population charges; simple additive bond charge corrections (BCCs) are then applied to these AM1 atomic charges to produce the AM1-BCC charges. The parameterization of BCCs was carried out by fitting to the HF/6-31G* ESP of a training set of >2700 molecules. Most organic functional groups and their combinations were sampled, as well as an extensive variety of cyclic and fused bicyclic heteroaryl systems. The resulting BCC parameters allow the AM1-BCC charging scheme to handle virtually all types of organic compounds listed in The Merck Index and the NCI Database. Validation of the model was done through comparisons of hydrogen-bonded dimer energies and relative free energies of solvation using AM1-BCC charges in conjunction with the 1994 Cornell et al. forcefield for AMBER.(13) Homo- and hetero-dimer hydrogen-bond energies of a diverse set of organic molecules were reproduced to within 0.95 kcal/mol RMS deviation from the ab initio values, and for DNA dimers the energies were within 0.9 kcal/mol RMS deviation from ab initio values. The calculated relative free energies of solvation for a diverse set of monofunctional isosteres were reproduced to within 0.69 kcal/mol of experiment. In all these validation tests, AMBER with the AM1-BCC charge model maintained a correlation coefficient above 0.96. Thus, the parameters presented here for use with the AM1-BCC method present a fast, accurate, and robust alternative to HF/6-31G* ESP-fit charges for general use with the AMBER force field in computer simulations involving organic small molecules.     

Atomic dipole moments calculated using analytical molecular second-moment gradients

We have implemented analytical second-moment gradients for Hartree-Fock and multiconfigurational self-consistent-field wave functions. The code is used to calculate atomic dipole moments based on the generalized atomic polar tensor (GAPT) formalism [Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1469 (1989)], and the proposal of Dinur and Hagler (DH) for the calculation of atomic multipoles [J. Chem. Phys. 91, 2949 (1989)]. Both approaches display smooth basis-set convergence toward a well-defined basis-set limit and give reasonable electron correlation effects on the calculated atomic properties. However, the atomic charges and atomic dipole moments obtained from the GAPT partitioning scheme are unable to provide even qualitatively meaningful molecular quadrupole moments for some molecules, and thus the atomic multipole moments calculated in this scheme cannot be considered well suited for analyzing the electron density in molecules and for calculating intermolecular interaction energies. In contrast, the DH approach gives atomic charges and dipole moments that by definition exactly reproduce the molecular quadrupole moments. The approach of DH is, however, restricted to planar molecules and thus suffers from not being applicable to molecules of arbitrary shape. Both the GAPT and DH approaches give rather poor results for octupole and hexadecapole moments, indicating that at least atomic quadrupole moments are required for an accurate representation of the molecular charge distribution in terms of atomic electric moments.     

Building molecular charge distributions from fragments: Application to HIV-1 protease inhibitors

Interaction energies are a function of the molecular charge distribution. In previous work, we found that the set of atomic partial charges giving the best agreement with experimental vacuum dipole moments were from density functional theory calculations using an extended basis set. Extension of such computations to larger molecules requires an atomic partial charge calculation beyond present computational resources. A solution to this problem is the calculation of atomic partial charges for segments of the molecule and reassociation of such fragments to yield partial charges for the entire molecule. Various partitions and reassociation methods for five molecules relevant to HIV-1 protease inhibitors are examined. A useful method of reassociation is introduced in which atomic partial charges for a large molecule are computed by fitting to the combined electrostatic potential calculated from the fragment partial charges. As expected, the best sites for partitions are shown to be carbon—carbon rather than carbon—nitrogen bonds. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

On the use of AM1 and MNDO wave functions to compute accurate electrostatic charges

A new strategy to evaluate accurate electrostatic charges from semiempirical wave functions is reported. The rigorous quantum mechanical molecular electrostatic potentials computed from both MNDO and AM1 wave functions are fitted to the point-charge molecular electrostatic potential to obtain the electrostatic charges. The reliability of this strategy is tested by comparing the semiempirical electrostatic charges for 21 molecules with the semiempirical Mulliken charges and with the ab initio STO-3G and 6-31G* electrostatic charges. The ability of the dipoles derived from the semiempirical electrostatic and Mulliken charges as well as from the SCF charge distributions to reproduce the ab initio 6-31G* electrostatic dipoles and the gas phase experimental values is determined. The statistical analysis clearly point out the goodness of the semiempirical electrostatic charges, specially when the MNDO method is used. The excellent relationships found between the MNDO and 6-31G* electrostatic charges permit to define a scaling factor which allows to accurately reproduce the 6-31G* electrostatic charge distribution as well as the experimental dipoles from the semiempirical electrostatic charges.     

PDDG/PM3 and PDDG/MNDO: improved semiempirical methods

Two new semiempirical methods employing a Pairwise Distance Directed Gaussian modification have been developed: PDDG/PM3 and PDDG/MNDO; they are easily implemented in existing software, and yield heats of formation for compounds containing C, H, N, and O atoms with significantly improved accuracy over the standard NDDO schemes, PM5, PM3, AM1, and MNDO. The PDDG/PM3 results for heats of formation also show substantial improvement over density functional theory with large basis sets. The PDDG modifications consist of a single function, which is added to the existing pairwise core repulsion functions within PM3 and MNDO, a reparameterized semiempirical parameter set, and modified computation of the energy of formation of a gaseous atom. The PDDG addition introduces functional group information via pairwise atomic interactions using only atom-based parameters. For 622 diverse molecules containing C, H, N, and O atoms, mean absolute errors in calculated heats of formation are reduced from 4.4 to 3.2 kcal/mol and from 8.4 to 5.2 kcal/mol using the PDDG modified versions of PM3 and MNDO over the standard versions, respectively. Several specific problems are overcome, including the relative stability of hydrocarbon isomers, and energetics of small rings and molecules containing multiple heteroatoms. The internal consistency of PDDG energies is also significantly improved, enabling more reliable analysis of isomerization energies and trends across series of molecules; PDDG isomerization energies show significant improvement over B3LYP/6-31G* results. Comparison of heats of formation, ionization potentials, dipole moments, isomer, and conformer energetics, intermolecular interaction energies, activation energies, and molecular geometries from the PDDG techniques is made to experimental data and values from other semiempirical and ab initio methods.     

Semiempirical treatment of electrostatic potentials and partial charges in combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical approaches

A semiempirical treatment of electrostatic potentials and partial charges is presented. These are the basic components needed for the evaluation of electrostatic interaction energies in combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical approaches. The procedure to compute electrostatic potentials uses AM1 and MNDO wave functions and is based on one previously suggested by Ford and Wang. It retains the NDDO approximation and is thus both easy to implement and computationally efficient. Partial atomic charges are derived from a semiempirical charge equilibration model, which is based on the principle of electronegativity equalization. Large sets of ab initio restricted Hartee-Fock (RHF/6-31G*) reference data have been used to calibrate the semiempirical models. Applying the final parameters (C, H, N, O), the ab initio electrostatic potentials are reproduced with an average accuracy of 20% (AM1) and 25% (MNDO), respectively, and the ab initio potential derived charges normally to within 0.1 e. In most cases our parameterized models are more accurate than the much more expensive quasi ab initio techniques, which employ deorthogonalized semiempirical wave functions and have generally been preferred in previous applications. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.