系统协同发展程度的DEA评价研究

协同发展是区域经济得以顺利、快速发展的客观要求和前提条件;是可持续发展基础性、前提性因素和实现手段.系统协同发展不是即生的,它是通过对原有系统不断的诊断、调整、评价,周而复始逐步实现的.对系统协同发展程度的评价是系统实现协同发展的前提、指导和路径.借助于DEA的方法,从系统协同发展的内容上,给出“协同”和“发展”的评价方法;从系统的结构上,给出系统内和系统间的“协同”和“发展”评价方法.     

基于DEA与Malmquist指数法的区域科技创新效率评价——以重庆市为例

本文以重庆市为例,运用DEA方法结合Malmquist指数分析了一个区域内不同性质的企事业单位的科技创新效率,从而得出整个区域的科技创新效率情况。研究发现,重庆市技术进步和全要素生产率较高,而技术效率、纯技术效率、规模效率有所下降,全要素生产率的提高主要是技术进步引起的。因此重庆市科技创新的首要任务是进行重庆创新领域的制度与管理调整。     

某些决策单元的EDA有效性的简便判别法

本给出了判别某些决策单元EDA有效性（C^2R或C^2GS^2）的简便方法。     

有关DEA中评价与排序的新方法的探讨

用新方法讨论了DEA中对决策单元的评价与排序,并研究了一些新问题.     

我国商业银行效率测度及其影响因素分析

本文首先采用DEA方法对1999-2004年我国14家商业银行的技术效率、纯技术效率、规模效率进行了测度,在此基础上利用Panel Data模型对影响我国银行效率的若干因素进行了检验,结果表明自有资本比率和资产费用率对银行效率有显著影响,贷款质量、资产市场份额与银行效率值之间呈现较弱的相关关系,产权结构多元化有利于提高银行效率.     

技术有效的决策单元与DEA有效性(C~2GS~2)

对李光金、阎洪先生所定义的技术有效的决策单元,证明了它是DEA有效(C~2GS~2)的,而且讨论了将非有效的决策单元转变为有效.     

有关Pareto解在DEA中的应用的探讨

对文[1]中有关DEA有效(C2R)的定理4,本文给出了在某种条件下的逆定理,以便简化DEA有效性(C2R)的判断.     

Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins,development and future directions

Sustainable development and sustainability assessment have been of great interest to both academe and practitioners in the past decades. In this study, we review the literature on data envelopment analysis (DEA) applications in sustainability using citation-based approaches. A directional network is constructed based on citation relationships among DEA papers published in journals indexed by the Web of Science database from 1996 to March 2016. We first draw the citation chronological graph to present a complete picture of literature development trajectory since 1996. Then we identify the local main DEA development paths in sustainability research by assigning an importance index, namely search path count (SPC), to each link in the citation network. The local main path suggests that the current key route of DEA applications in sustainability focus on the environmental sustainability. Through the Kamada–Kawai layout algorithm, we find four research clusters in the literature including corporate sustainability assessment, regional sustainability assessment, sustainability composite indicator construction, and sustainability performance analysis. For each of the clusters, we further identify the key articles based on citation network and local citation scores, demonstrate the developmental trajectory of the literature, and suggest future research directions.     

在DEA中有关输出与输入的比值的模型的探讨

对以决策单元的输出与输入的比值为目标函数的多目标规划模型,证明了有关它与(弱)DEA有效(C2R)关系的三个定理.     

A new method for complete ranking of DMUs

So far numerous models have been proposed for ranking the efficient decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). But, the most shortcoming of these models is their two-stage orientation. That is, firstly we have to find efficient DMUs and then rank them. Another flaw of some of these models, like AP-model (A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 39 (10) (1993) 1261–1264), is existence of a non-Archimedean number in their objective function. Besides, when there is more than one weak efficient unit (or non-extreme efficient unit) these models could not rank DMUs. In this paper, we employ hyperplanes of the production possibility set (PPS) and propose a new method for complete ranking of DMUs in DEA. The proposed approach is a one stage method which ranks all DMUs (efficient and inefficient). In addition to ranking, the proposed method determines the type of efficiency for each DMU, simultaneously. Numerical examples are given to show applicability of the proposed method.     

DEA中有效值的一种求法与保序的条件

对DEA中决策单元的有效值,本文给出了求它的二个定理,并给出了在导入新的决策单元后其保序的充分条件,最后举例说明这条件不成立时的结果.     

弱DEA有效性（C^2GS^2）的研究

本证明了一个[1]中所述的有关弱DEA有效性（C^2GA^2）的定理,答复了[2]中所提出的问题。     

Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method

In this paper, an extension tool of data envelopment analysis (DEA), namely cross efficiency evaluation method, is used to measure the performance of the nations participating in the last six Summer Olympic Games. The model in the paper considers two inputs (GDP per capita and population) and three outputs (number of gold, silver and bronze medals won), and the weight restrictions are included to guarantee that a unit of silver medal corresponds to a higher valuation than a unit of bronze medal, and the highest for gold medal. The results for the last six Summer Olympic Games are analyzed, and a unique ordering of the participants based on average cross efficiency is provided, also cluster analysis technique is used to select the more appropriate targets for poorly performing countries to use as benchmarks.     

基于改进的GRA-PDEA模型的应急系统优化选址

从应急系统优化选址的实践需求出发,构建了多输入/多输出、多种数据类型的决策指标体系,给出了针对成本/效益指标的区间型、模糊型属性值的规范化处理模型,得到各备选方案的指标属性值规范化矩阵.采用了带决策者偏好的数据包络分析模型进行优化选址决策,体现了在应急系统优化选址问题中应注重的相对有效性决策策略,同时引入基于灰色关联分析的定权模型,使决策过程既发挥决策者的主观能动性,又规避其主观臆断.通过给出备选方案的实证分析,较好地实现了应急系统优化选址的目的,选址结果与实际情况也是相吻合的.     

The interval efficiency based on the optimistic and pessimistic points of view

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a data-oriented approach for evaluating the performances of a set of peer entities called decision-making units (DMUs), whose performance is determined based on multiple measures. The traditional DEA, which is based on the concept of efficiency frontier (output frontier), determines the best efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. Based on these scores, DMUs are classified into DEA-efficient (optimistic efficient) or DEA-non-efficient (optimistic non-efficient) units, and the DEA-efficient DMUs determine the efficiency frontier. There is a comparable approach which uses the concept of inefficiency frontier (input frontier) for determining the worst relative efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. DMUs on the inefficiency frontier are specified as DEA-inefficient or pessimistic inefficient, and those that do not lie on the inefficient frontier, are declared to be DEA-non-inefficient or pessimistic non-inefficient. In this paper, we argue that both relative efficiencies should be considered simultaneously, and any approach that considers only one of them will be biased. For measuring the overall performance of the DMUs, we propose to integrate both efficiencies in the form of an interval, and we call the proposed DEA models for efficiency measurement the bounded DEA models. In this way, the efficiency interval provides the decision maker with all the possible values of efficiency, which reflect various perspectives. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed DEA models.     

有关判断决策单元的DEA有效性的新方法的探讨

为了判断决策单元是否(弱)DEA有效并克服现有的模型及[1]中模型在解决上述问题时的不足之处,本文将讨论的新模型是由CCR模型与CCGSS模型变来的,且定理的证明不同于[1]．还讨论了文中新模型的最优解的存在性,此外,研究了所有决策单元的输入输出的变化对某决策单元有效性的影响．     

Improving weak efficiency frontiers in the fuzzy data envelopment analysis models

Evaluating the performance of activities or organization by common data envelopment analysis models requires crisp input/output data. However, the precise inputs and outputs of production processes cannot be always measured. Thus, the data envelopment analysis measurement containing fuzzy data, called “fuzzy data envelopment analysis”, has played an important role in the evaluation of efficiencies of real applications. This paper focuses on the fuzzy CCR model and proposes a new method for determining the lower bounds of fuzzy inputs and outputs. This improves the weak efficiency frontiers of the corresponding production possibility set. Also a numerical example illustrates the capability of the proposed method.     

基于DEA和SFA的我国商业银行效率研究

本文利用板块数据,分别采用非参数前沿法中的DEA法和参数前沿法中的SFA法对我国十四家商业银行1997-2001期间的综合效率进行了测度,在此基础上对两种方法测度出的银行效率值排序进行了相关分析和一致性检验,结果表明两种方法测度出的银行效率在数值上有显著差异,但在是效率排序上具有很好的一致性。     

具有非期望产出的随机DEA模型研究

为解决含有不确定信息的非期望产出效率评价问题,建立了一个非期望产出的随机DEA模型.该模型将非期望产出作为负期望产出进行处理,引入了期望效率值、显著性水平来刻画随机问题,并通过机会约束规划的相关知识将模型转化为确定形式.对模型的最优值的相关性质进行了探讨,说明最优值与期望效率值、显著性水平之间的关系.最后给出数值实验说明该模型的有效性.     

大学生就业扶持政策的有效性分析及改进:基于DEA方法的实证分析

鉴于数据包络分析(DEA)方法在评价多输入、多输出系统相对有效性方面所具有的优越性,基于DEA方法构建了C2R模型及相应投影分析模型和评价指标体系,对1999-2008年中国所实行的大学生就业扶持政策的有效性进行了评价分析,实证分析结果表明1999-2002年的大学生就业扶持政策在促进和解决大学生就业方面的效果显著,而2003年以后的大学生就业扶持政策在解决大学生就业问题上存在明显的效率损失,且政策效果逐年下降.为了提高大学生就业扶持政策的实施效果,就业扶持政策在未来的改进重点应着力从财政补贴、高等教育经费投入和贷款补助等政策内容入手,并提高政策的执行力度.