Synthesis,Structural Characterization and Thermal Stability of [Mn(3‐bpd)2(NCS)2(H2O)2]·2H2O (1) and {[Mn(bpe)(NCS)2(H2O)2]·(3‐bpd)·(bpe)·H2O}n (2) from One‐Pot Crystallization

Two supramolecular architectures, [Mn(3‐bpd)₂(NCS)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O ( 1 ) and {[Mn(bpe)(NCS)₂(H₂O)₂]·(3‐bpd)·(bpe)·H₂O}_n ( 2 ) [bpe = 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene and 3‐bpd = 1,4‐bis(3‐pyridyl)‐2,3‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene] have been synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic, elemental and single crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses. Compound 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c, with chemical formula C₂₆H₂₈Mn N₁₀O₄S₂, a = 9.1360(6), b = 9.7490(6), c = 17.776(1) Å, β = 93.212(1)°, and Z = 2 while compound 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic system, space group P2₁2₁2₁, with chemical formula C₃₈H₃₆Mn₁N₁₀O₃S₂, a = 14.1902(6), b = 15.4569(7), c = 18.2838(8) Å, α = β = γ = 90°, and Z = 4. Structural determination reveals that the coordination geometry at Mn(II) in compound 1 or 2 is a distorted octahedral which consists of two nitrogen donors of two NCS^?ligands, two oxygen donors of two water molecules, and two nitrogen donors of two 3‐bpd ligands for 1 and two dpe ligands for 2 , respectively. The two 3‐bpd ligands in 1 adopt a monodentate binding mode and the dpe in 2 adopts a bismonodentate bridging mode to connect the Mn(II) ions forming a 1D chain‐like coordination polymer. Both the π‐π stacking interactions between the coordinated and the free pyridyl‐based ligands and intermolecular hydrogen bonds among the coordinated and the crystallized water molecules and the free pyridyl‐based ligands play an important role in construction of these 3D supramolecular architectures.     

配合物[Cu2(bpe)X2] n (bpe =1, 2–trans–(4–pyridyl)ethene, X=Cl, Br, I )的合成、晶体结构及热稳定性研究

以1,2-反式-二（4-吡啶基）乙烯桥连卤化铜分别得到配合物[Cu₂(bpe)Cl ₂] _n (1), [Cu₂(bpe)Br₂] _n (2) 和 [Cu₂(bpe)I₂] _n (3)。通过X-射线单晶衍射法对配合物1的结构进行了研究,晶体学数据：单斜晶系, P 2(1)/c空间群, a = 0.3788(8) nm, b = 1.5059(3) nm, c = 1.0875(2)nm, β = 96.262(4) °, V = 616.5(2)ų, Z = 2, S = 1.002,最终残差因子( I >2 σ ( I )) R ₁ = 0.0288, wR ₂ = 0.0579,对于全部数据 R ₁ = 0.0509, wR ₂ = 0.0615。元素分析及红外光谱分析表明,该类配合物为同晶化合物。另外,通过热重分析对配合物的热稳定性进行了研究。     

New Binuclear Copper Complexes [(9S3)Cu(CN)Cu(9S3)]Xn (X=BF4, n=1; X=TCNQ,n=2) (9S3=1, 4, 7‐trithiacyclononane): Syntheses,Crystal Structures and Magnetic Properties

The binuclear Cu complex salts of 1, 4, 7‐trithiacyclononane (9S3) with an inorganic anion (BF₄)^‐ and with an organic radical anion TCNQ^‐ (7, 7′, 8, 8′‐tetracyanoquinodimethanide) were synthesized and their molecular and crystal structures were examined in connection with the magnetic properties. The new complex cation [Cu(9S3)CN(9S3)Cu]⁺ varies its charges and magnetic properties depending on the counter anions; [Cu(9S3)CN(9S3)Cu](BF₄) ( 1 ) was obtained as diamagnetic colorless crystals, while [Cu(9S3)CN(9S3)Cu](TCNQ)₂ ( 2 ) was obtained as dark blue crystals with antiferromagnetic properties. Complex 1 crystallized in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a = 26.863(2), b = 7.0878(5), c = 13.4864(8) Å, β = 116.318(2)°. Complex 2 crystallized in the triclinic space group P1¯ with a = 12.521(1), b = 20.2698(8), c = 8.0205(4) Å, α = 100.688(4), β = 93.846(5), γ = 94.953(4)°. Both complexes are comprised of cyano‐bridged two Cu(9S3) ions with tetrahedral coordination. The X‐ray structural study revealed that 1 has two crystallographically equivalent copper(I) atoms, while 2 has two crystallographically independent Cu^I/II sites. The two Cu^I/II sites could not be distinguished from the X‐ray structural study. For 2 the IR spectra show that both crystallographically independent TCNQ species were monoanions and are strongly dimerized due to π‐stacking, which well explains their diamagnetic contribution to the magnetic susceptibility and the highly insulating property of this salt. The temperature‐dependent magnetic susceptibility of 2 showed a deviation from the Curie‐Weiss behaviour around 60 K, which indicates a strong antiferromagnetic intermolecular interaction between the copper complexes and that such intermolecular interaction should partly occur via the TCNQ radical anion dimer.     

Hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions in the cocrystal salt [Fe(bpe)2(H2O)4](TCEP)2·2(bpe) [bpe is trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene and TCEP is 1,1,3,3‐tetracyano‐2‐ethoxypropenide]

The cocrystal salt tetraaquabis[trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene‐κN]iron(II) bis(1,1,3,3‐tetracyano‐2‐ethoxypropenide)–trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene (1/2), [Fe(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)₂(H₂O)₄](C₉H₅N₄O)₂·2C₁₂H₁₀N₂, is a rare example of a mononuclear Fe^II compound with trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethane (bpe) ligands. The complex cation resides on a crystallographically imposed inversion center and exhibits a tetragonally distorted octahedral coordination geometry. Both the symmetry‐independent bpe ligand and the cocrystallized bpe molecule are essentially planar. The 1,1,3,3‐tetracyano‐2‐ethoxypropenide counter‐ion is nonplanar and the bond lengths are consistant with significant electron delocalization. The extended structure exhibits an extensive O—H…N hydrogen‐bonding network with layers of complex cations joined by the cocrystallized bpe. Both the coordinated and the cocrystallized bpe are involved in π–π interactions. Hirshfeld and fingerprint plots reveal the important intermolecular interactions. Density functional theory was used to estimate the strengths of the hydrogen‐bonding and π–π interactions, and suggest that the O—H…N hydrogen bonds enhance the strength of the π‐interactions by increasing the polarization of the pyridine rings.     

Crystal Structures of [Mn2(H2O)4(phen)2(C4H4O4)2] · 2 H2O and [Mn(phen)2(H2O)2][Mn(phen)2(C4H4O4)](C4H4O4) · 7 H2O

Reactions of 1,10‐phenanthroline monohydrate, Na₂C₄H₄O₄ · 6 H₂O and MnSO₄ · H₂O in CH₃OH/H₂O yielded a mixture of [Mn₂(H₂O)₄(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂] · 2 H₂O ( 1 ) and [Mn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂][Mn(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)](C₄H₄O₄) · 7 H₂O ( 2 ). The crystal structure of 1 (P1 (no. 2), a = 8.257(1) Å, b = 8.395(1) Å, c = 12.879(2) Å, α = 95.33(1)°, β = 104.56(1)°, γ = 106.76(1)°, V = 814.1(2) ų, Z = 1) consists of the dinuclear [Mn₂(H₂O)₄(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂] molecules and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The centrosymmetric dinuclear molecules, in which the Mn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and four O atoms from two H₂O molecules and two bis‐monodentate succinato ligands, are assembled via π‐π stacking interactions into 2 D supramolecular layers parallel to (101) (d(Mn–O) = 2.123–2.265 Å, d(Mn–N) = 2.307 Å). The crystal structure of 2 (P1 (no. 2), a = 14.289(2) Å, b = 15.182(2) Å, c = 15.913(2) Å, α = 67.108(7)°, β = 87.27(1)°, γ = 68.216(8)°, V = 2934.2(7) ų, Z = 2) is composed of the [Mn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ cations, [Mn(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)] complex molecules, (C₄H₄O₄)^2– anions, and H₂O molecules. The (C₄H₄O₄)^2– anions and H₂O molecules form 3 D hydrogen bonded network and the cations and complex molecules in the tunnels along [001] and [011], respectively, are assembled via the π‐π stacking interactions into 1 D supramolecular chains. The Mn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by four N atoms of two bidentate chelating phen ligands and two water O atoms or two carboxyl O atoms (d(Mn–O) = 2.088–2.129 Å, d(Mn–N) = 2.277–2.355 Å). Interestingly, the succinato ligands in the complex molecules assume gauche conformation bidentately to chelate the Mn atoms into seven‐membered rings.     

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of Copper(II) and Copper(I) dpp Complexes, [Cu(dpp)Br2] and [Cu(dpp)2][CuBr2] (dpp = 2,9‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline)

The complexes [Cu(dpp)Br₂] ( 1 ) and [Cu(dpp)₂][CuBr₂] ( 2 ) (dpp = 2,9‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) were synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods. Reaction of copper(II) bromide with the dpp ligand in dichloromethane at room temperature afforded 1 , which is a rare example of non‐square planar four‐coordinate copper(II) complexes. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a = 15.352(3), b = 13.192(3), c = 11.358(2) Å, β = 120.61(3)°, V = 1979.6(7) ų, Z = 4, D_calc = 1.865 g cm^?3. The coordination geometry about the copper center is distorted about halfway between square planar and tetrahedral. The Cu‐N distance is 2.032(2) Å and the Cu‐Br distance 2.3521(5) Å. Heating a CH₂Cl₂ or acetone solution of 1 resulted in complex 2 , which consists of a slightly distorted tetrahedral [Cu(dpp)₂]⁺ cation and a linear two‐coordinate [CuBr₂]^? anion. 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group with a = 10.445(2), b = 11.009(2), c = 18.458(4) Å, α = 104.72(3), β = 94.71(3), γ = 103.50(3)°, V = 1973.3(7) ų, Z = 2, D_calc = 1.602 g cm^?3. The four Cu(1)‐N distances are between 2.042(3) and 2.067(3) Å, the distance of Cu(2)‐Br(1) 2.2268(8) Å, and the disordered Cu(3)‐Br(2) distances are 2.139(7) and 2.237(4) Å, respectively. Complex 2 could also be prepared by directly reacting CuBr with dpp in CH₂Cl₂.     

The three‐dimensional coordination polymer poly[[aqua[μ4‐2,2′‐(diazene‐1,2‐diyl)dibenzoato]lead(II)] 1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethylene hemisolvate]

A novel three‐dimensional coordination polymer, {[Pb(C₁₄H₈N₂O₄)(H₂O)]·0.5C₁₂H₁₀N₂}_n, has been synthesized by hydrothermal reaction of Pb(OAc)₂·3H₂O (OAc is acetate), 2,2′‐(diazene‐1,2‐diyl)dibenzoic acid (H₂L) and 1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethylene (bpe). The asymmetric unit contains a crystallographically independent Pb^II cation, one L²⁻ ligand, an aqua ligand and half a bpe molecule. Each Pb^II centre is seven‐coordinated by six O atoms of bridging–chelating carboxylate groups from L²⁻ ligands and by one O atom from a coordinated water molecule. The Pb^II cations are bridged by L²⁻ ligands, forming [PbO₂]_n chains along the a axis. These chains are further connected by L²⁻ ligands along the b and c axes to give a three‐dimensional framework with a 4¹²6³ topology. The channel voids are occupied by bpe molecules.     

EPR Spectroscopy of 4, 4′‐Bis(tert‐butyl)‐2, 2′‐bipyridine‐1, 2‐dithiolatocuprates(II) in Host Lattices with Different Coordination Geometries

A series of new heteroleptic MN₂S₂ transition metal complexes with M = Cu²⁺ for EPR measurements and as diamagnetic hosts Ni²⁺, Zn²⁺, and Pd²⁺ were synthesized and characterized. The ligands are N₂ = 4, 4′‐bis(tert‐butyl)‐2, 2′‐bipyridine (tBu₂bpy) and S₂ =1, 2‐dithiooxalate, (dto), 1, 2‐dithiosquarate, (dtsq), maleonitrile‐1, 2‐dithiolate, or 1, 2‐dicyanoethene‐1, 2‐dithiolate, (mnt). The Cu^II complexes were studied by EPR in solution and as powders, diamagnetically diluted in the isostructural planar [Ni^II(tBu₂bpy)(S₂)] or[Pd^II(tBu₂bpy)(S₂)] as well as in tetrahedrally coordinated[Zn^II(tBu₂bpy)(S₂)] host structures to put steric stress on the coordination geometry of the central CuN₂S₂ unit. The spin density contributions for different geometries calculated from experimental parameters are compared with the electronic situation in the frontier orbital, namely in the semi‐occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) of the copper complex, derived from quantum chemical calculations on different levels (EHT and DFT). One of the hosts, [Ni^II(tBu₂bpy)(mnt)], is characterized by X‐ray structure analysis to prove the coordination geometry. The complex crystallizes in a square‐planar coordination mode in the monoclinic space group P2₁/a with Z = 4 and the unit cell parameters a = 10.4508(10) Å, b = 18.266(2) Å, c = 12.6566(12) Å, β = 112.095(7)°. Oxidation and reductions potentials of one of the host complexes, [Ni(tBu₂bpy)(mnt)], were obtained by cyclovoltammetric measurements.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of the Helical Coordination Polymers [Co(phen)(oba)(H2O)2] and [Cd3(phen)3(oba)2(Hoba)2(H2O)2] (phen = 1, 10‐phenanthroline; oba = 4, 4′‐oxybis(benzoate)

Two coordination polymers, [Co(phen)(oba)(H₂O)₂] ( 1 ) and [Cd₃(phen)₃(oba)₂(Hoba)₂(H₂O)₂] ( 2 ) (oba = 4, 4′‐oxybis(benzoate), phen = 1, 10‐phenanthroline) have been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. Complex 1 crystallizes in monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 7.543(6), b = 33.05(2), c = 9.902(5)Å, β = 103.69(2)°, V = 2398(3)ų, Z = 4; 2 in monoclinic, P2/n, a = 15.11(1), b = 10.069(8), c = 28.02(2)Å, β = 101.83(1)°, V = 4174(5)ų, Z = 2. X‐ray single‐crystal diffraction investigations shows that the complexes 1 and 2 consist of helical chains, which are further assembled into layers and networks via supramolecular interactions such as π—π stacking interactions and hydrogen bonds, respectively. The results indicate that the coordination environment is one of the most important factors for assembly of single‐stranded helical chains into double‐stranded helical chains via supramolecular interactions.     

Hydroxo‐bridged Tetranuclear CuII Complexes: {[Cu(bpy)(OH)]4Cl2}Cl2 · 6 H2O and {[Cu(phen)(OH)]4(H2O)2}]Cl4 · 4 H2O

The blue tetranuclear Cu^II complexes {[Cu(bpy)(OH)]₄Cl₂}Cl₂ · 6 H₂O ( 1 ) and {[Cu(phen)(OH)]₄(H₂O)₂}Cl₄ · 4 H₂O ( 2 ) were synthesized and characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. ( 1 ): P 1 (no. 2), a = 9.240(1) Å, b = 10.366(2) Å, c = 12.973(2) Å, α = 85.76(1)°, β = 75.94(1)°, γ = 72.94(1)°, V = 1152.2(4) ų, Z = 1; ( 2 ): P 1 (no. 2), a = 9.770(3) Å, b = 10.118(3) Å, c = 14.258(4) Å, α = 83.72(2)°, β = 70.31(1)°, γ = 70.63(1)°, V = 1252.0(9) ų, Z = 1. The building units are centrosymmetric tetranuclear {[Cu(bpy)(OH)]₄Cl₂}²⁺ and {[Cu(phen)(OH)]₄(H₂O)₂}⁴⁺ complex cations formed by condensation of four elongated square pyramids CuN₂(OH)₂L^ap with the apical ligands L^ap = Cl, H₂O, OH. The resulting [Cu₄(μ₂‐OH)₂(μ₃‐OH)₂] core has the shape of a zigzag band of three Cu₂(OH)₂ squares. The cations exhibit intramolecular and intermolecular π‐π stacking interactions and the latter form 2D layers with the non‐bonded Cl^– anions and H₂O molecules in between (bond lengths: Cu–N = 1.995–2.038 Å; Cu–O = 1.927–1.982 Å; Cu–Cl^ap = 2.563; Cu–O^ap(OH) = 2.334–2.369 Å; Cu–O^ap(H₂O) = 2.256 Å). The Cu…Cu distances of about 2.93 Å do not indicate direct interactions, but the strongly reduced magnetic moment of about 2.74 B.M. corresponds with only two unpaired electrons per formula unit of 1 (1.37 B.M./Cu) and obviously results from intramolecular spin couplings (χ_m(T‐θ) = 0.933 cm³ · mol^–1 · K with θ = –0.7 K).     

Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Magnetic Properties of Three New Iron Complexes Derived from 3,5‐Bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole

Two new iron(III) complexes and one iron(II) complex have been synthesized from the solvothermal reactions of FeCl₃·6H₂O with 3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole (Hbpt) in methanol or acetonitrile. KSCN acted as the reducing agent in the synthesis of iron(II) complex of 3 . [FeCl₃(Hbpt)(H₂O)]·H₂O ( 1 ) crystallizes in the triclinic space group with a = 7.475(1), b = 9.468(2), c = 12.309(2) Å, α = 73.880(2), β = 74.746(2), γ = 81.849(2)°, V = 805.2(2) ų, Z = 2. [Fe₂(bpt)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ): orthorhombic space group Pnnm with a = 9.895(2), b = 10.632(2), c = 13.195(2) Å, V = 1388.1(4) ų, Z = 2. [Fe₂(bpt)₂(MeOH)₂Cl₂] ( 3 ): orthorhombic space group Pbca with a = 14.4204(16), b = 9.8737(11), c = 19.792(2) Å, V = 2818.1(5) ų, Z = 4. 1 features the first structurally characterized metal complex of the neutral Hbpt ligand in which the Hbpt ligand adopts an unprecedented zwitterionic form. 2 shows a neutral dinuclear iron(III) complex and the [Fe₂(bpt)₂]⁴⁺ unit is ideally planar. The two iron(III) ions separated by a distance of 4.408(2) Å are doubly triazolate‐bridged. Each dimeric unit is connected with six other dimeric ones via the bifurcated C‐H···Cl hydrogen bonds, these connections extend the dimeric moieties into a three‐dimensional molecular architecture. 3 is a neutral centrosymmetric dinuclear Fe^II complex, in which intermolecular moderate O‐H···N hydrogen bonding interactions between the methanol molecules and 4‐position nitrogen atoms of the triazolato groups extend the dinuclear species into a two‐dimensional supramolecular architecture of (4,4) topology. Magnetic studies indicate there exists an antiferromagnetic spin coupling in Fe^III₂ and Fe^II₂ units via the double triazolate bridges in 2 and 3 .     

Syntheses of Halogenated Polyhedral Phosphaboranes: Crystal Structure of conjuncto‐3,3′‐(closo‐1,2‐P2B4Br3)2

Co‐pyrolysis of B₂Br₄ with PBr₃ at 480 °C gave, in addition to the main product closo‐1,2‐P₂B₄Br₄, conjuncto‐3,3′‐(1,2‐P₂B₄Br₃)₂ ( 1 ) and the twelve‐vertex closo‐1,7‐P₂B₁₀Br₁₀ ( 2 ), both in low yields. X‐ray structure determination for 1 [triclinic, space‐group P1 with a = 7.220(2) Å, b = 7.232(2) Å, c = 8.5839(15) Å, α = 97.213(15)°, β = 96.81(2)°, γ = 94.07(2)° and Z = 1] confirmed that 1 adopts a structure consisting of two symmetrically boron–boron linked distorted octahedra with the bridging boron atoms in the 3,3′‐positions and the phosphorus atoms in the 1,2‐positions. The intercluster 2e/2c B–B bond length is 1.61(3) Å. The shortest boron–boron bond within the cluster framework is 1.68(2) Å located between the boron atoms antipodal to the phosphorus atoms. The icosahedral phosphaborane 2 was characterized by ¹¹B‐¹¹B COSY NMR spectroscopy showing cross peaks indicative for the isomer with the phosphorus atoms in 1,7‐positions. Both the X‐ray data of 1 and the NMR spectroscopic data of 1 and 2 give further evidence for the influence of an antipodal effect of heteroatoms to cross‐cage boron atoms and, vice versa, of an additional shielding of the phosphorus atoms caused by B‐Hal substitution at the boron positions trans to phosphorus.     

Alkoxo‐Verbindungen des dreiwertigen Eisen: Synthese und Charakterisierung von [Fe2(OtBu)6], [Fe2Cl2(OtBu)4], [Fe2Cl4(OtBu)2] und [N(nBu)4]2[Fe6OCl6(OMe)12]

Alkoxo Compounds of Iron(III): Syntheses and Characterization of [Fe₂(OtBu)₆], [Fe₂Cl₂(OtBu)₄], [Fe₂Cl₄(OtBu)₂] and [N(nBu)₄]₂[Fe₆OCl₆(OMe)₁₂] The reaction of iron(III)chloride in diethylether with sodium tert‐butylat yielded the homoleptic dimeric tert‐‐butoxide Fe₂(OtBu)₆ ( 1 ). The chloro‐derivatives [Fe₂Cl₂(OtBu)₄] ( 2 ), and [Fe₂Cl₄(OtBu)₂] ( 3 ) could be synthesized by ligand exchange between 1 and iron(III)chloride. Each of the molecules 1 , 2 , and 3 consists of two edge‐sharing tetrahedrons, with two tert‐butoxo‐groups as μ₂‐bridging ligands. For the synthesis of the alkoxides 1 , 2 , and 3 diethylether plays an important role. In the first step the dietherate of iron(III)chloride FeCl₃(OEt₂)₂ ( 4 ) is formed. The reaction of iron(III)chloride with tetrabutylammonium methoxide in methanol results in the formation of a tetrabutylammonium methoxo‐chloro‐oxo‐hexairon cluster [N(nBu)₄]₂[Fe₆OCl₆(OMe)₁₂] ( 5 ). Crystal structure data: 1 , triclinic, P1¯, a = 9.882(2) Å, b = 10.523(2) Å, c = 15.972(3) Å, α = 73.986(4)°, β = 88.713(4)°, γ = 87.145(4)°, V = 1594.4(5) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.146 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.044; 2 , monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 11.134(2) Å, b = 10.141(2) Å, c = 12.152(2) Å und β = 114.157(3)°, V = 1251.8(4) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.377 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.0581; 3 , monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 6.527(2) Å, b = 11.744(2) Å, c = 10.623(2), β = 96.644(3)°, V = 808.8(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.641 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.0174; 4 , orthorhombic, Iba2, a = 23.266(5) Å, b = 9.541(2) Å, c = 12.867(3) Å, V = 2856(2) ų, Z = 8, d_c = 1.444 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.0208; 5 , trigonal, P3₁, a = 13.945(2) Å, c = 30.011(6) Å, V = 5054(2) ų, Z = 6, d_c = 1.401 gcm^—1; R_c = 0.0494.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Properties of [Mn(hdpa)2(N(CN)2)2] and [Co(hdpa)2(N(CN)2)2] (hdpa = 2, 2'‐Dipyridylamine)

Two new transition metal(II) complexes [M(hdpa)₂(N(CN)₂)₂] (M = Mn ( 1 ), Co ( 2 ); hdpa = 2, 2'‐dipyridylamine) have been prepared and characterized structurally and magnetically. Both compounds crystallize in the monoclinic space group C2/c. 1 and 2 are isotypic with the unit cell parameters a = 8.634(9), b = 13.541(14), c = 21.99(2) Å, β = 94.806(18)°, and V = 2562(5) ų for 1 , a = 8.617(3) Å, b = 13.629(5)Å, c = 21.598(8)Å, β = 94.593(6)°, and V = 2528.4(15)ų for 2 , and Z = 4 for both. According to X‐ray crystallographic studies, each metal(II) ion was six‐coordinated with four nitrogen atoms from two bidentate hdpa ligand and two nitrogen atoms from two N(CN)^— anions to form slightly distorted octahedrons. Adjacent complex molecules are connected by hydrogen bonds or π···π interactions to form three‐dimensional network. The IR and UV spectroscopy were measured and the magnetic behaviors were investigated.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Thermal Properties of the Energetic Coordination Compound [Co(DAT)2(H2O)4](HTNR)2·2H2O (DAT = 1,5‐diaminotetrazole)

A new coordination complex, [Co(DAT)₂(H₂O)₄](HTNR)₂ · 2H₂O [DAT = 1,5‐diaminotetrazole, HTNR = 2,4,6‐trinitroresorcinol (styphnic acid)], was obtained in high yield and characterized by elemental analysis and Fourier‐transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy. The molecular structure of [Co(DAT)₂(H₂O)₄](HTNR)₂ · 2H₂O in the crystalline state is determined by X‐ray crystallography is as follows: monoclinic, C2/c, a = 19.216(3) Å, b = 5.4992(8) Å, c = 30.418(5) Å, β = 104.500(5), V = 3112.0(8) ų, Z = 4, ρ_calc. = 1.851 g · cm^–3, R₁ = 0.0271 and wR₂ = (all data) 0.0674. The central cobalt(II) cation is coordinated by two nitrogen atoms of two DAT and four oxygen atoms of four H₂O ligand molecules to form a six‐coordinate and slightly distorted octahedral structure. Extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonds link molecular units of [Co(DAT)₂(H₂O)₄(HTNR)₂ · 2H₂O together to form a 3D net structure with pore canals. The thermal decomposition mechanism for the title compound was predicted based on DSC, TG‐DTG, and FT‐IR analyses and non‐kinetic parameters of the first exothermic process were estimated by applying the Kissinger, Starink, and Ozawa–Doyle methods.     

(2‐Methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato)­iron(III) and ‐copper(II) complexes

The crystal structures of tris(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­iron(III), [Fe­(C₁₀­H₈­NO)₃], (I), and aqua­bis(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­copper(II), [Cu­(C₁₀­H₈NO)₂­(H₂O)], (II), have been determined. Compound (I) has a distorted octahedral configuration, in which the central Fe atom is coordinated by three N atoms and three O atoms from three 2‐methylquinolin‐8‐olate ligands. The three Fe—O bond distances are in the range 1.934 (2)–1.947 (2) Å, while the three Fe—N bond distances range from 2.204 (2) to 2.405 (2) Å. In compound (II), the central Cu^II atom and H₂O group lie on the crystallographic twofold axis and the coordination geometry of the Cu^II atom is close to trigonal bipyramidal, with the three O atoms in the basal plane and the two N atoms in apical positions. The Cu—N bond length is 2.018 (5) Å. The Cu—O bond length in the basal positions is 1.991 (4) Å, while the Cu—O bond length in the apical position is 2.273 (6) Å. There is an intermolecular OW—H?O hydrogen bond which links the mol­ecules into a linear chain along the b axis.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Manganese(II) Bipyridine Carboxylato Complexes: [(bipy)2MnII(μ‐C2H5CO2)2MnII(bipy)2](ClO4)2 and [MnII(ClCH2CO2)(H2O)(bipy)2]ClO4 · H2O (bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridine)

Two manganese(II) bipyridine carboxylate complexes, [(bipy)₂Mn^II(μ‐C₂H₅CO₂)₂Mn^II(bipy)₂}₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ), and [Mn^II(ClCH₂CO₂)(H₂O)(bipy)₂]ClO₄ · H₂O ( 2 ) were prepared. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 8.604(3), b = 12.062(3), c = 13.471(3) Å, α = 112.47(2), β = 93.86(2), γ = 92.87(3)°, V = 1211.1(6) ų and Z = 1. In the dimeric, cationic complex with a crystallographic center of symmetry two 2,2′‐bipyridine molecules chelate each manganese atom. These two metal fragments are then bridged by two propionato groups in a syn‐anti conformation. The Mn…Mn distance is 4.653 Å. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 9.042(1), b = 13.891(1), c = 21.022(3) Å, β = 102.00(1)°, V = 2569.3(5) ų and Z = 4. 2  is a monomeric cationic complex in which two bipyridine ligands chelate the manganese atom in a cis fashion. A chloroacetato and an aqua ligand complete the six‐coordination. Only in 2 is the intermolecular packing controlled by weak π‐stacking besides C–H…π contacts between the bipyridine ligands.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Characterization of [FeIIILCl3] (L = 1, 4, 8‐Triazacycloundecane, 1, 4, 7‐Triazacyclononane)

The structures of [Fe^III(tacud)Cl₃] ( 1 ) and [Fe^III(tacn)Cl₃] ( 2 ) (tacud = 1, 4, 8‐triazacycloundecane, tacn = 1, 4, 7‐triazacyclononane) are reported. Both compounds crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pnma with a = 12.5570(9), b = 12.0028(9), c = 8.2577(6) Å, V = 1244.59(16) ų, and Z = 4 for 1 and a = 12.095(4), b = 11.125(4), c = 7.963(3) Å, V = 1071.5(6) ų, and Z = 4 for 2 . The structures of 1 and 2 feature iron(III) in distorted octahedral arrangement with three facially coordinated nitrogen ligands and three chlorides. Bidirectional intermolecular hydrogen bonding between N–H groups and coordinated chlorides is seen for 1 and 2 . Compound 1 is the first example of iron(III) bonded to tacud and compound 2 is only the second structure reported of a 1:1 complex between iron and tacn. The Fe^3+/2+ redox couple for 1 is observed at E_1/2 = 0.25 V (ΔE_p = 99 mV), and for 2 at E_1/2 = 0.09 V (ΔE_p = 108 mV) versus NHE in DMF at 298 K. Comparison of structural, magnetic, and electrochemical properties for 1 and 2 reveal subtle differences consistent with the stronger coordinating properties of tacn relative to tacud.     

Three Ternary Rare Earth(III) Complexes Based on 3‐[(4,6‐Dimethyl‐2‐pyrimidinyl)thio]‐propanoic Acid and 1,10‐Phenanthroline: Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Antioxidant Activity

Three ternary rare earth [Nd^III ( 1 ), Sm^III ( 2 ) and Y^III ( 3 )] complexes based on 3‐[(4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐pyrimidinyl)thio]‐propanoic acid (HL) and 1,10‐phenanthroline (Phen) were synthesized and characterized by IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, TGA, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structures showed that complexes 1 – 3 contain dinuclear rare earth units bridged by four propionate groups and are of general formula [REL₃(Phen)]₂ · nH₂O (for 1 and 2 : n = 2; for 3 : n = 0). All rare earth ions are nine‐coordinate with distorted mono‐capped square antiprismatic coordination polyhedra. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c with a = 16.241(7) Å, b = 16.095(7) Å, c = 19.169(6) Å, β = 121.48(2)°. Complex 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c with a = 16.187(5) Å, b = 16.045(4) Å, c = 19.001(4) Å, β = 120.956(18)°. Complex 3 crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group P1 with a = 11.390(6) Å, b = 13.636(6) Å, c = 15.958(7) Å, α = 72.310(17)°, β = 77.548(15)°, γ = 78.288(16)°. The antioxidant activity test shows that all complexes own higher antioxidant activity than free ligands.     

A Novel Adipate Bridged Supramolecular Layer: Crystal Structure of the Cobalt(II) Complex [(μ‐C6H8O4)4/2Co(μ‐H2O)2Co(H2O)4] · 4 H2O

The pale‐rose compound [(μ‐C₆H₈O₄)_4/2Co(μ‐H₂O)₂Co(H₂O)₄] · 4 H₂O was prepared from adipic acid and CoCO₃ in aqueous solution. The crystal structure (monoclinic, P2₁/n (no. 14), a = 8.061(1), b = 15.160(2), c = 9.708(2) Å, β = 90.939(7)°, Z = 2, R = 0.0405, wR² = 0.0971) consists of adipate bridged supramolecular [(μ‐C₆H₈O₄)_4/2Co(μ‐H₂O)₂Co(H₂O)₄] layers and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The cobalt atoms Co1 and Co2 are distorted octahedrally coordinated by the O atoms of two bridging trans‐H₂O molecules and four bidentate adipate anions (Co1) and by the O atoms of two bridging trans‐H₂O molecules and four monodentate H₂O molecules (Co2), respectively. Equatorial bonds: d(Co1–O) = 2.048 Å (2 × ), 2.060 Å (2 × ); d(Co2–O) = 2.057 Å (2 × ), 2.072 Å (2 × ). Axial bonds: d(Co1–O) = 2.235 Å (2 × ); d(Co2–O) = 2.156 Å (2 × ).