Synthese und Struktur von η1‐Phosphaallyl‐, η1‐Arsaallylund η1‐Stibaallyleisen‐Komplexen [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2Fe–E(SiMe3)C(OSiMe3)=CPh2] (E = P,As, Sb)

Syntheses and Structures of η¹‐Phosphaallyl, η¹‐Arsaallyl, and η¹‐Stibaallyl Iron Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] (E = P, As, Sb) The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 a : E = P; 1 b : As; 1 c : Sb) and diphenylketene afforded the η¹‐phosphaallyl‐, η¹‐arsaallyl‐, and η¹‐stibaallyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] ( 2 a : E = P; 2 b : As; 2 c : Sb). The molecular structures of 2 b and 2 c were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Übergangsmetall-substituierte Acylphosphane und Phosphaalkene. 22 [1] Insertionen von Hexafluoraceton in die PX-Bindung von Metallophosphanen des Typs (η5-C5Me5)(CO)2M?PX2 (M = Fe,Ru; X = Me3Si,Cl). Strukturbestimmung von (η5-C5Me5)(CO)2Fe?P(SiMe3)C(CF3)2(OSiMe3)

Transition Metal-substituted Acylphosphanes and Phosphaalkenes. 22. Insertions of Hexafluoroacetone into the PX-Bond of Metallophosphanes (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂M? PX₂ (M = Fe, Ru; X = Me₃Si, Cl). Structure Determination of (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe? P(SiMe₃)C(CF₃)₂(OSiMe₃) Reaction of the metallophosphanes (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂M? P(SiMe₃)₂ ( 1a : M = Fe; 1b : M = Ru) with hexafluoroacetone (HFA) afforded the complexes (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂M? P(SiMe₃)C(CF₃)₂(OSiMe₃) ( 2a, b ). The attempted synthesis of a metallophosphaalkene from 2a by thermal elimination of hexamethyldisiloxane failed. The acid catalyzed hydrolysis of 2a afforded compound (η⁵-C₅Me₅) · (CO)₂Fe? P(H)C(CF₃)₂(OSiMe₃) ( 3 ). Hexafluoracetone and (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe? PCl₂ ( 4 ) under-went reaction to give the metallochlorophosphan (η⁵-C₅Me₅) · (CO)₂Fe? P(Cl)? O? C(CF₃)₂Cl ( 5 ). Constitutions and configurations of the compounds ( 2–5 ) were established by elemental analyses and spectroscopic data (IR, ¹H-, ¹³C, ¹⁹F-, ²⁹Si-, ³¹P-NMR, MS). The molecular structure of 2a was determined by x-ray diffraction analysis.     

Reaktive E=C(p‐p)π‐Systeme. 54 [1] Reaktionen des Perfluor‐2‐arsapropens,F3CAs=CF2 (1), mit H‐aciden Verbindungen Me2EH (E = N,P, As) und MeE′H (E′ = O,S, Se)

Reactive E=C(p‐p)π‐Systems. 54 [1] Reactions of perfluoro‐2‐arsapropene, F₃CAs=CF₂ (1), with H‐acidic compounds Me₂EH (E = N, P, As) and MeE′H (E′ = O, S, Se) The reactions of the perfluoro‐2‐arsapropene ( 1 ) with H‐acidic compounds Me₂EH (E = N, P, As) and MeE′H (E′ = O, S, Se), respectively, proceed via addition to the As=C double bond yielding either secondary arsanes F₃C(H)AsCF₂X (X = NMe₂, PMe₂, OMe, SMe) or AsX derivatives (X = AsMe₂, SeMe). Me₂‐AsH is obviously a border case nucleophile because, besides the AsX derivative as main product, small amounts of the arsane are formed indicative for the reverse addition pathway. With the strong base Me₂NH, the addition is followed immediately by HF elimination producing the fairly stable arsaalkene F₃CAs=C(F)NMe₂ ( 4 ) which had already been obtained by reaction of HAs(CF₃)₂ with three equivalents of Me₂NH. The novel rather labile compounds were identified by spectroscopic (NMR, GC/MS) investigations. – Quantum chemical DFT calculations [B3LYP/6‐311+G(d,p)] were carried out to determine the relative energy of the isomeric products and the thermodynamics of the addition reactions.     

Komplexchemie P‐reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XXII. Die Bildung von [η2‐{tBu–P=P–SiMe3}Pt(PR3)2]aus (Me3Si)tBuP–P=P(Me)tBu2 und [η2‐{C2H4}Pt(PR3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXII. The Formation of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂] from (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ and [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P = P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] yielding [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂]. However, there is no indication for an isomer which would be the analogue to the well known [η²‐{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂]. The syntheses and NMR data of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PMe₃)₂] as well as the results of the single crystal structure determination of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] are reported.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Five-, six- and eight-membered ring organosilicon chalcogenides of the types Z2(SiMe2)2E (Z = Me2Si, H2C; E = S, Se, Te), Z(SiMe2E)2MR2 (Z = Me2Si, H2C, O; E = S, Se, Te; M = Si, Ge, Sn, R = Me, Ph) and (SiMe2ZSiMe2E)2 (Z = Me2Si, H2C; E = S, Se)

Reactions of ClMe₂Si–Z–SiMe₂Cl (Z = SiMe₂ (1a), CH₂ (1c), O (1e)) with Li₂E (E = S, Se) yielded eight-membered ring compounds (SiMe₂ZSiMe₂E)₂ (3a–d) as well as acyclic oligomers (SiMe₂ZSiMe₂E)_x of different chain lengths. If 1:1 molar mixtures of 1a, 1c or 1e and a diorganodichlorosilane, -germane or -stannane (R₂MCl₂) are reacted with Li₂E (E = S, Se, Te), six-membered ring compounds Z(SiMe₂E)₂MR₂ (4a–7g) are formed exclusively. Five-membered rings Z₂(SiMe₂)₂E (Z = SiMe₂ (8a–c), CH₂ (9a–c); E = S, Se, Te) are obtained starting from the tetrasilane ClMe₂Si–(SiMe₂)₂–SiMe₂Cl (1b) or the disilylethane ClMe₂Si–(CH₂)₂–SiMe₂Cl (1d) by treatment with Li₂E. All products were characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ²⁹Si, ¹¹⁹Sn, ⁷⁷Se, ¹²⁵Te, including coupling constants) and the effects of the different ring sizes towards NMR chemical shifts are discussed.     

Einfluß der Ringatome auf die Struktur von Triel‐Pentel‐Heterozyklen – Synthese und Molekülstrukturen von [Me2InAs(SiMe3)2]2 und [Me2InSb(SiMe3)2]3

Influence of the Ring Atoms on the Structure of Triel‐Pentel Heterocycles – Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structures of [Me₂InAs(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and [Me₂InSb(SiMe₃)₂]₃ Triel‐pentel heterocycles [Me₂InE(SiMe₃)₂]_x have been prepared by dehalosilylation reactions from Me₂InCl and E(SiMe₃)₃ (E = As, x = 2; E = Sb, x = 3) and characterised by NMR spectroscopy and by X‐ray crystal structure analyses. In addition the X‐ray crystal structures of [Me₂GaAs(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and [Me₂InP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ are reported. The compounds complete a family of 13 identically substituted heterocycles [Me₂ME(SiMe₃)₂]_x (M = Al, Ga, In; E = N, P, As, Sb, Bi; x = 2, 3), whose structures were investigated depending on the ring atoms M and E. The tendencies that have been observed concerning the ring sizes can be explained by the interplay of the atomic radii of the central atoms and the sterical demand of the ligands. After a formal separation of the M–E bonds in σ bonds and dative bonds the characteristic differences and trends in the endocyclic and exocyclic bond angles of both centres M and E can be interpreted on the basis of a simple Lewis acid/base adduct model.     

[2+4] and [2+2] Cycloaddition Reactions of N‐Sulfinyl Carboxylic Acid Amides with (CF3)2BNMe2. Crystal Structure of cyclo‐(CF3)2B‐NMe2‐S(=O)‐N=C(p‐CH3C6H4)‐O

N‐sulfinylacylamides R‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with (CF₃)₂BNMe₂ ( 1 ) to form, by [2+4] cycloaddition, six‐membered rings cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(R)‐O for R = Me ( 2 ), t‐Bu ( 3 ), C₆H₅ ( 4 ), and p‐CH₃C₆H₄ ( 5 ) while N‐sulfinylcarbamic acid esters R‐O‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with 1 to yield mixtures of six‐membered (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(OR)‐O) and four‐membered rings (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N(C=O)OR) for R = Me ( 6 and 9 ), Et ( 7 and 10 ), and C₆H₅ ( 8 and 11 ). The structure of 5 has been determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Schrittweise Darstellung von verzweigten tripodalen Chlor‐Methyl‐Siloxanen der allgemeinen Formel tBuSi[{OSiMe2}yOSiMe3–xClx]3 [x = 0–3; y = 0–2] sowie Synthese der Silanole tBuSi[(OSiMe2)xOH]3 [x = 1, 2] und des bicyclischen Siloxans tBuSi(OSiMe2O)3SitBu

The branched tripodal chloro‐methyl‐siloxanes of the general formula tBuSi[{OSiMe₂}_yOSiMe_3–xCl_x]₃ [x = 0–3; y = 0–2] were synthesized, starting with tert‐Butyl‐trisilanol ( 1 ). The treatment of 1 with the chloro‐methyl‐silanes (Me_3–xSiCl_x+1) (x = 0–3) in the presence of triethylamine leads to the compounds tBuSi(OSiMe₂Cl)₃ ( 2 ), tBuSi(OSiMeCl₂)₃ ( 3 ) and tBuSi(OSiCl₃)₃ ( 4 ). The siloxanes 2 – 4 are colourless oily liquids, which can be purified by distillation. Their yields decrease with the number of chloro substituents. In the reaction of compound 2 with three equivalents of water the silantriol tBuSi(OSiMe₂OH)₃ ( 5 ) is generated which is used to create the branched tripodal chloro‐methyl‐siloxanes tBuSi(OSiMe₂OSiMe₃)₃ ( 6 ), tBuSi(OSiMe₂OSiMe₂Cl)₃ ( 7 ), tBuSi(OSiMe₂OSiMeCl₂)₃ ( 9 ) and tBuSi(OSiMe₂OSiCl₃)₃ ( 10 ). Compound ( 7 ) is only a side product with a yield of 25 %., The cyclic tBuSi[{(OSiMe₂)₂Cl}(OSiMe₂)₃O] ( 8 ) can be isolated and characterised. The transformation of the compound tBuSi(OSiMe₂OSiMe₂Cl)₃ ( 7 ) into the trisilanol tBuSi(OSiMe₂OSiMe₂OH)₃ ( 11 ) allows to prepare the tripodale siloxane tBuSi(OSiMe₂OSiMe₂OSiMe₃)₃ ( 12 ) in good yields., The reaction of tBuSi(OSiMe₂Cl)₃ ( 2 ) with tert‐butyl trisilanol 1 leads to the formation of bicyclic tBuSi(OSiMe₂O)₃SitBu ( 13 ). An X‐ray structure determination on 13 reveals a [3.3.3]‐bicycle with a C₃ axis, which crystallizes in the cubic crystal system in the space group Pa . The reported compounds 2 – 13 were characterised by NMR‐ and IR spectroscopy ( 5 , 11 ) and show correct elemental analyses. The ²⁹Si‐NMR‐data of the compounds show interesting trends with respect to the Si–O chain length and the chloro substistuents.     

Zweikernkomplexe des Typs Mn2(CO)8E(CF3)2E′R (E = P,As; E′ = S,Se, Te): Darstellung und Struktur

Perfluoromethyl Element Ligands. XLII Binuclear Complexes of the Type Mn₂(CO)₈E(CF₃)₂E′R (E = P, As; E′ = S, Se, Te): Synthesis and Structure Complexes of the type Mn₂(CO)₈E(CF₃)₂E′R, in which the groups E(CF₃)₂ and E′R act as bridging ligands, are prepared either by direct reactions of Mn₂(CO)₁₀ with (F₃C)₂EE′R (E = P, As; E′ = S, Se, Te) or by substitution of the iodine bridge in the representatives Mn₂(CO)₈ E(CF₃)₂I (E = P, As) with mercury compounds Hg(E′R)₂. As a rule the binuclear systems contain four‐membered heterocycles (Mn₂EE′). However, the reactions of Mn₂(CO)₁₀ with (F₃C)₂PE′P(CF₃)₂ (E′ = S, Se) yield five‐membered rings [Mn₂P(E′P)]. The compounds have been characterized by spectroscopic (NMR, IR, MS), analytic (C, H) and X‐ray diffraction investigations. The pyramidal Mn₂E′R fragment shows dynamic behaviour in solution via inversion between two identical structures.     

Synthesis of a Metallo‐Iminosilane via a Silanone–Metal π‐Complex

Facile oxygenation of the acyclic amido‐chlorosilylene bis(N‐heterocyclic carbene) Ni⁰ complex [{N(Dipp)(SiMe₃)ClSi:→Ni(NHC)₂] ( 1 ; Dipp=2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₄; N‐heterocyclic carbene=C[(ⁱPr)NC(Me)]₂) with N₂O furnishes the first Si‐metalated iminosilane, [DippN=Si(OSiMe₃)Ni(Cl)(NHC)₂] ( 3 ), in a rearrangement cascade. Markedly, the formation of 3 proceeds via the silanone (Si=O)–Ni π‐complex 2 as the initial product, which was predicted by DFT calculations and observed spectroscopically. The Si=O and Si=N moieties in 2 and 3 , respectively, show remarkable hydroboration reactivity towards H−B bonds of boranes, in the former case corroborating the proposed formation of a (Si=O)–Ni π‐complex at low temperature.     

Synthese,NMR‐Spektren und Molekülstruktur von [(CH3)2Ga{μ‐P(H)Si(CH3)3}2Ga(CH3)2{μ‐P(Si(CH3)3)2}Ga(CH3)2]

Synthesis, NMR Spectra and Structure of [(CH₃)₂Ga{μ‐P(H)Si(CH₃)₃}₂Ga(CH₃)₂{μ‐P(Si(CH₃)₃)₂}Ga(CH₃)₂] The title compound has been prepared in good yield by the reaction of [Me₂GaOMe]₃ (Me = CH₃) with HP(SiMe₃)₂ in toluene (ratio 1 : 1,1) and purified by crystallization from pentane or toluene, respectively. This organogallium compound forms (Ga–P)₃ ring skeletons with one Ga–P(SiMe₃)₂–Ga and two Ga–P(H)SiMe₃–Ga bridges and crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c. The known homologous Al‐compound is isotypic, both (M^III–P)₃ heterocycles have twist‐conformations, the ligands of the monophosphane bridges have trans arrangements.     

Bis(arylimido) Molybdenum(VI) Amidinate and Guanidinate Complexes; Molecular Structures of [(ArN)2MoMe{N(Cy)C[N(i‐Pr)2]N(Cy)}] (Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3; Cy = Cyclohexyl) and [(2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3N)2MoCl2] · [NH=C(C6H5)CH(SiMe3)2]

The reaction of [(ArN)₂MoCl₂] · DME (Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃) ( 1 ) with lithium amidinates or guanidinates resulted in molybdenum(VI) complexes [(ArN)₂MoCl{N(R¹)C(R²)N(R¹)}] (R¹ = Cy (cyclohexyl), R² = Me ( 2 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(i‐Pr)₂ ( 3 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(SiMe₃)₂ ( 4 ); R¹ = SiMe₃, R² = C₆H₅ ( 5 )) with five coordinated molybdenum atoms. Methylation of these compounds was exemplified by the reactions of 2 and 3 with MeLi affording the corresponding methylates [(ArN)₂MoMe{N(R¹)C(R²)N(R¹)}] (R¹ = Cy, R² = Me ( 6 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(i‐Pr)₂ ( 7 )). The analogous reaction of 1 with bulky [N(SiMe₃)C(C₆H₅)C(SiMe₃)₂]Li · THF did not give the corresponding metathesis product, but a Schiff base adduct [(ArN)₂MoCl₂] · [NH=C(C₆H₅)CH(SiMe₃)₂] ( 8 ) in low yield. The molecular structures of 7 and 8 are established by the X‐ray single crystal structural analysis.     

Amidometallate von Seltenerdelementen. Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Na(12-Krone-4)2][M{N(SiMe3)2}3(OSiMe3)] (M = Sm,Yb), [Na(THF)3Sm{N(SiMe3)2}3(C≡C–Ph)], [Na(THF)6][Lu2(μ-NH2)(μ-NSiMe3){N(SiMe3)2}4] sowie von [NaN(SiMe3)2(THF)]2. Anwendungen der Seltenerdkomplexe als Polymerisationskatalysatoren

Amido Metalates of Rare Earth Elements. Syntheses and Crystal Structures of [Na(12-crown-4)₂][M{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃(OSiMe₃)] (M = Sm, Yb), [Na(THF)₃Sm{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃(C≡C–Ph)], [Na(THF)₆][Lu₂(μ-NH₂)(μ-NSiMe₃){N(SiMe₃)₂}₄], and of [NaN(SiMe₃)₂(THF)]₂. Applications of Rare Earth Metal Complexes as Polymerization Catalysts The amido silyloxy complexes [Na(12-crown-4)₂][M{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃(OSiMe₃)] with M = Sm ( 1 a ), Eu ( 1 b ), Yb ( 1 c ), and Lu ( 1 d ) were obtained from the trisamides M[N(SiMe₃)₃]₃ and NaOSiMe₃ in n-hexane in the presence of 12-crown-4; they form yellow to orange-red crystals, of which 1 a and 1 c were characterized crystallographically. The complexes crystallize isotypically with one another in the monoclinic space group I2/a with eight formula units per unit cell. The metal atoms of the complex anions are tetrahedrally coordinated by the three nitrogen atoms of the N(SiMe₃)₂^– ligands and by the oxygen atom of the OSiMe₃^– ligand. With 172.4° for 1 a and 179.3° for 1 c the bond angles M–O–Si are practically linear. With ethynylbenzene in the presence of NaN(SiMe₃)₂ in tetrahydrofuran the trisamides M[N(SiMe₃)₂]₃ react under formation of the complexes [Na(THF)₃M{N(SiMe₃)₂}₃ · (C≡C–Ph)] with M = Ce ( 2 a ), Sm ( 2 b ), and Eu ( 2 c ), of which 2 b was characterized crystallographically (monoclinic, space group P2₁/n, Z = 4). 2 b forms an ion pair in which the terminal carbon atom of the C≡C–Ph^– ligand is connected with the samarium atom of the Sm[N(SiMe₃)₂]₃ group and the sodium ion is side-on connected with the acetylido group. According to the crystal structure determination (space group P2₁2₁2₁, Z = 4) [Na(THF)₆][Lu₂(μ-NH₂)(μ-NSiMe₃) · {N(SiMe₃)₂}₄] ( 3 ), which is formed as a by-product, consists of [Na(THF)₆]⁺ ions and dimeric anions, in which the lutetium atoms are connected to form a planar Lu₂N₂ four-membered ring via a μ-NH₂ bridge with average Lu–N distances of 227.2 pm and via a μ-NSiMe₃ bridge of average Lu–N distances of 218.5 pm. According to the crystal structure determination (space group P 1, Z = 1) [NaN(SiMe₃)₂(THF)]₂ ( 4 ) forms centrosymmetric dimeric molecules with Na–N distances of the Na₂N₂ four-membered ring of 239.9 pm and distances Na–O of the terminally bonded THF molecules which are 226.7 pm. The vinylic polymerization of methylmethacrylate (MMA) catalyzed by 1 c resulted in high molecular weight polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with moderate yields. The reaction of 1 a or 2 b with MMA did not give PMMA. Insoluble polynorbornene was obtained in low yields by reaction of norbornene/methylaluminoxane (MAO) with 1 a , 1 c , or 2 b . The ring opening polymerization of ϵ-caprolacton or δ-valerolacton catalyzed by 2 b resulted in corresponding polylactones in quantitative yields.     

Fluoroborates by Cleavage of Trimethylamine‐bis(trifluoromethyl)boranes with NEt3 × 3 HF. Structures of C6F5(CF3)2B · NMe3, K[C6H5CH2(CF3)2BF], and K[C6H5(CF3)2BF]

Trimethylamine‐bis(trifluoromethyl)boranes R(CF₃)₂B · NMe₃ (R = cis/trans‐CF₃CF=CF ( 1/2 ), HC≡C ( 3 ), H₂C=CH ( 4 ), C₂H₅ ( 5 ), C₆H₅CH₂ ( 6 ), C₆F₅ ( 7 ), C₆H₅ ( 8 )) react with NEt₃ × 3 HF depending on the nature of R at 155–200 °C under replacement of the trimethylamine ligand to form the corresponding fluoro‐bis(trifluoromethyl)borates [R(CF₃)₂BF]^– ( 1 a/2 a – 8 a ). The structures of 7 , K[C₆H₅CH₂(CF₃)₂BF] ( K‐6 a ), and K[C₆H₅(CF₃)₂BF] ( K‐8 a ) have been investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In 7 the CF₃ groups make short repulsive contacts with NMe₃ and C₆F₅ entities – the B–CF₃ bonds being unusually long. The B–F bond lengths of K‐6 a and K‐8 a (1.446(3) and 1.452(2) Å, respectively) are long for a fluoroborate.     

Diversification of ortho‐Fused Cycloocta‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Cores and Eight‐ to Six‐Ring Conversion by σ Bond C−C Cleavage

Sequential treatment of 2‐C₆H₄Br(CHO) with LiC≡CR¹ (R¹=SiMe₃, tBu), nBuLi, CuBr?SMe₂ and HC≡CCHClR² [R²=Ph, 4‐CF₃Ph, 3‐CNPh, 4‐(MeO₂C)Ph] at ?50 °C leads to formation of an intermediate carbanion (Z)‐1,2‐C₆H₄{C_A(=O)C≡C_BR¹}{CH=CH(CH^?)R²} ( 4 ). Low temperatures (?50 °C) favour attack at C_B leading to kinetic formation of 6,8‐bicycles containing non‐classical C‐carbanion enolates ( 5 ). Higher temperatures (?10 °C to ambient) and electron‐deficient R² favour retro σ‐bond C?C cleavage regenerating 4 , which subsequently closes on C_A providing 6,6‐bicyclic alkoxides ( 6 ). Computational modelling (CBS‐QB3) indicated that both pathways are viable and of similar energies. Reaction of 6 with H⁺ gave 1,2‐dihydronaphthalen‐1‐ols, or under dehydrating conditions, 2‐aryl‐1‐alkynylnaphthlenes. Enolates 5 react in situ with: H₂O, D₂O, I₂, allylbromide, S₂Me₂, CO₂ and lead to the expected C ‐E derivatives (E=H, D, I, allyl, SMe, CO₂H) in 49–64 % yield directly from intermediate 5 . The parents (E=H; R¹=SiMe₃, tBu; R²=Ph) are versatile starting materials for NaBH₄ and Grignard C=O additions, desilylation (when R¹=SiMe) and oxime formation. The latter allows formation of 6,9‐bicyclics via Beckmann rearrangement. The 6,8‐ring iodides are suitable Suzuki precursors for Pd‐catalysed C?C coupling (81–87 %), whereas the carboxylic acids readily form amides under T3P® conditions (71–95 %).     

Oxidative Reactions of the MoIV Dialkyl Complex [{(3‐CF3C6H4NCH2CH2)2NMe}Mo(CH2SiMe3)2]

The structure of [(CF₃N₂NMe)Mo(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] (in which (CF₃N₂NMe)^2? is [(3‐CF₃C₆H₄NCH₂CH₂)₂NMe]^2?) is approximately trigonal bipyramidal with one axial and one equatorial alkyl ligand. Heating of solutions of [(CF₃N₂NMe)Mo(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] in [D₆]benzene in the presence of five equivalents of 2‐butyne led to diamagnetic [(CF₃N₂NMe)Mo(CHSiMe₃)(η²‐MeC?CMe)], whose structure is approximately square pyramidal with the alkyne occupying the axial site. Addition of one equivalent of cyclohexene sulfide to [(CF₃N₂NMe)Mo(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] at room temperature produced the diamagnetic, dimeric molybdenum(IV) sulfido complex, [{(CF₃N₂NMe)MoS}₂]. This complex is composed of two approximately trigonal bipyramidal centers, each containing one axial and one equatorial sulfur atom. Oxidation of [(CF₃N₂NMe)Mo(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] with hexachloroethane resulted in formation of tetramethylsilane, HCl, and the sparingly soluble, red alkylidyne complex, [{(CF₃N₂NMe)Mo(CSiMe₃)Cl}₂]. This complex forms a dimer through bridging chlorides. The oxidation reactions of [(CF₃N₂NMe)Mo(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] with 2‐butyne, cyclohexene sulfide, or C₂Cl₆ are all proposed to proceed by α‐hydrogen abstraction in the Mo^VI species to yield (initially) the Mo?CHSiMe₃ species and tetramethylsilane.     

Silver–Ethene Complexes [Ag(η2‐C2H4)n][Al(ORF)4] with n=1, 2, 3 (RF=Fluorine‐Substituted Group)

Compounds including the free or coordinated gas‐phase cations [Ag(η²‐C₂H₄)_n]⁺ (n=1–3) were stabilized with very weakly coordinating anions [A]^? (A=Al{OC(CH₃)(CF₃)₂}₄, n=1 ( 1 ); Al{OC(H)(CF₃)₂}₄, n=2 ( 3 ); Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄, n=3 ( 5 ); {(F₃C)₃CO}₃Al‐F‐Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₃, n=3 ( 6 )). They were prepared by reaction of the respective silver(I) salts with stoichiometric amounts of ethene in CH₂Cl₂ solution. As a reference we also prepared the isobutene complex [(Me₂C?CH₂)Ag(Al{OC(CH₃)(CF₃)₂}₄)] ( 2 ). The compounds were characterized by multinuclear solution‐NMR, solid‐state MAS‐NMR, IR and Raman spectroscopy as well as by their single crystal X‐ray structures. MAS‐NMR spectroscopy shows that the [Ag(η²‐C₂H₄)₃]⁺ cation in its [Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]^? salt exhibits time‐averaged D_3h‐symmetry and freely rotates around its principal z‐axis in the solid state. All routine X‐ray structures (2θ_max.<55°) converged within the 3σ limit at C?C double bond lengths that were shorter or similar to that of free ethene. In contrast, the respective Raman active C?C stretching modes indicated red‐shifts of 38 to 45 cm^?1, suggesting a slight C?C bond elongation. This mismatch is owed to residual librational motion at 100 K, the temperature of the data collection, as well as the lack of high angular data owing to the anisotropic electron distribution in the ethene molecule. Therefore, a method for the extraction of the C?C distance in [M(C₂H₄)] complexes from experimental Raman data was developed and meaningful C?C distances were obtained. These spectroscopic C?C distances compare well to newly collected X‐ray data obtained at high resolution (2θ_max.=100°) and low temperature (100 K). To complement the experimental data as well as to obtain further insight into bond formation, the complexes with up to three ligands were studied theoretically. The calculations were performed with DFT (BP86/TZVPP, PBE0/TZVPP), MP2/TZVPP and partly CCSD(T)/AUG‐cc‐pVTZ methods. In most cases several isomers were considered. Additionally, [M(C₂H₄)₃] (M=Cu⁺, Ag⁺, Au⁺, Ni⁰, Pd⁰, Pt⁰, Na⁺) were investigated with AIM theory to substantiate the preference for a planar conformation and to estimate the importance of σ donation and π back donation. Comparing the group 10 and 11 analogues, we find that the lack of π back bonding in the group 11 cations is almost compensated by increased σ donation.     

Preparation,Spectroscopic Properties,and Crystal Structures of Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)(μ‐CF2)2, Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CO)2(μ‐CF2), and Fe2(CO)6(μ‐CF2)(PPh3)2 – Theoretical Studies of Methylenic vs. Carbonyl Bridges in Diiron Complexes

The reaction of Na₂[Fe(CO)₄] with Br₂CF₂ in n‐pentane generates a mixture of the compounds (CO)₃Fe(μ‐CO)_3–n(μ‐CF₂)_nFe(CO)₃ ( 2 , n = 2; 3 , n = 1) in low yields with 3 as the main product. 3 is obtained free from 2 by reacting Br₂CF₂ with Na₂[Fe₂(CO)₈]. The non‐isolable monomeric complex (CO)₄Fe=CF₂ ( 1 ) can probably considered as the precursor for 2 . 3 reacts with PPh₃ with replacement of two CO ligands to form Fe₂(CO)₆(μ‐CF₂)(PPh₃)₂ ( 4 ). The complexes 2 – 4 were characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. While the structure of 2 is strictly similar to that of Fe₂(CO)₉, the structure of 3 can better be described as a resulting from superposition of the two enantiomers 3 a and 3 b with two semibridging CO groups. Quantum chemical DFT calculations for the series (CO)₃Fe(μCO)_3–n(μ‐CF₂)_nFe(CO)₃ (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) as well as for the corresponding (μ‐CH₂) derivatives indicate that the progressively larger σ donor and π acceptor properties for the bridging ligands, in the order CO < CF₂ < CH₂, favor a stronger Fe–Fe bond.     

Nature of the Arsonium‐Ylide Ph3As=CH2 and a Uranium(IV) Arsonium–Carbene Complex

Treatment of [Ph₃EMe][I] with [Na{N(SiMe₃)₂}] affords the ylides [Ph₃E=CH₂] (E=As, 1As ; P, 1P ). For 1As this overcomes prior difficulties in the synthesis of this classical arsonium‐ylide that have historically impeded its wider study. The structure of 1As has now been determined, 45 years after it was first convincingly isolated, and compared to 1P , confirming the long‐proposed hypothesis of increasing pyramidalisation of the ylide‐carbon, highlighting the increasing dominance of E⁺?C^? dipolar resonance form (sp³‐C) over the E=C ene π‐bonded form (sp²‐C), as group 15 is descended. The uranium(IV)–cyclometallate complex [U{N(CH₂CH₂NSiPrⁱ₃)₂(CH₂CH₂SiPrⁱ₂CH(Me)CH₂)}] reacts with 1As and 1P by α‐proton abstraction to give [U(Tren^TIPS)(CHEPh₃)] (Tren^TIPS=N(CH₂CH₂NSiPrⁱ₃)₃; E=As, 2As ; P, 2P ), where 2As is an unprecedented structurally characterised arsonium‐carbene complex. The short U?C distances and obtuse U‐C‐E angles suggest significant U=C double bond character. A shorter U?C distance is found for 2As than 2P , consistent with increased uranium‐ and reduced pnictonium‐stabilisation of the carbene as group 15 is descended, which is supported by quantum chemical calculations.