Synthesis,Characterization, and Crystal Structure of a Chromium(III)‐Complex Containing 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid and 1,10‐Phenanthroline

The reaction of solution 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid and 1,10‐phenanthroline ( 1 ) with CrCl₃·6H₂O led to the complex [Cr(phen)(pydc)(H₂O)][Cr(pydc)₂]·4H₂O ( 2 ) (phen is 1,10‐phenanthroline and pydcH₂ is 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid). 2 was characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal structure determination. Crystal data for 2 at ?80 °C: triclinic, space group , a = 818.5(1), b = 1492.2(1), c = 1533.6(2) pm, α = 76.45(1)°, β = 84.22(1)°, γ = 77.99(1)°, Z = 2, R₁ = 0.0416.     

Ion Pairing,H‐bonding,and π‐π Interactions in Cobalt(II) Compound Containing Guanidinium Counter Ion

A novel proton transfer compound, (GH)₂(phendc), ( 1 ), was synthesized from the reaction of 1,10‐phenanthroline‐2,9‐dicarboxylic acid, phendcH₂, and guanidine hydrochloride, (GH)(Cl), (G: guanidine). The characterization was performed using IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The cobalt(II) compounds were synthesized using proton transfer compounds containing guanidinium counter ion. These proton transfer compounds are (GH)₂(phendc), and (GH)₂(pydc) (pydcH₂: 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid). The chemical formulae and space groups are (GH)₂[Co(phendc)₂]·4H₂O, (2) , and (GH)₂[Co(H₂O)₆][Co(pydc)₂]₂, P2₁/n (3) . Non‐covalent interactions such as ionpairing, hydrogen bonding and π‐π stacking are discussed.     

Novel Complexes of Gallium(III), Indium(III), and Thallium(III) with Pyridine‐Containing Proton Transfer Ion Pairs Obtained from Dipicolinic Acid – Synthesis,Characterization and X‐ray Crystal Structure

Three new complexes of group thirteen metals, gallium(III), indium(III), and thallium(III) with proton transfer compounds, obtained from 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid (dipicolinic acid), were synthesized and characterized using elemental analysis, IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The gallium(III) and indium(III) complexes were prepared using (pydaH₂)(pydc) (pyda = 2,6‐pyridinediamine, pydcH₂ = dipicolinic acid) and thallium(III) complex was obtained from (creatH)(pydcH) (creat = creatinine). The chemical formulae and space groups of the complexes are (pydaH)[Ga(pydc)₂] · 3.25H₂O · CH₃OH, ( 1 ), [In(pydc)(pydcH)(H₂O)₂] · 5H₂O, Pna2₁ ( 2 ) and [Tl₂(pydcH)₃(pydc)(H₂O)₂], ( 3 ). Non‐covalent interactions such as ion‐pairing, hydrogen bonding and π‐π stacking are discussed. The complexation reactions of pyda, pydc, and pyda + pydc with In³⁺ and Ga³⁺ ions in aqueous solution were investigated by potentiometric pH titrations, and the equilibrium constants for all major complexes formed are described.     

A Nine‐Coordinated ZrIV Complex and a Self‐Assembling System Obtained from a Proton Transfer Compound Containing 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylate and 2,6‐Pyridinediammonium; Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structure

Starting with a zirconium salt and LH₂ , (pydaH₂)²⁺(pydc)^2?, (pyda=2, 6‐pyridinediamine; pydcH₂=2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid), as a 1:1 proton transfer self‐associated compound, two different compounds were resulted. One of them is a new complex of Zr^IV with a flat pyridine containing ligand and structure of (pydaH)₂[Zr(pydc)₃] · 5H₂O (1) and the other, (pydaH)⁺(NO₃)^? (2) is an ion pair with no zirconium ion. The zirconium(IV) complex (1) is crystallized in triclinic system with space group and Z = 2, the crystallographic parameters are: a = 10.612(5) Å, b = 10.617(5) Å, c = 16.815(8) Å, α = 103.654(9)°, β = 95.821(9)°, γ = 98.891(9)° and R‐value for 16767 collected reflections is 0.0592. The ion pair (2) has crystals of monoclinic system with P2₁ space group and Z = 2. Its crystallographic parameters are: a = 3.6227(11) Å, b = 10.034(4) Å, c = 10.296(4) Å, β = 93.422(9)° and R‐value for 4031 collected reflections is 0.0521. The two compounds were characterized with elemental analysis, ESI/MS, NMR and IR spectroscopy.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Crystal Structure of Thallium(I) Complex containing Monodeprotonated 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid

The reaction of an ethanolic solution 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid ( 1 , LH₂) with TlNO₃ in the presence of triethylamine led to the coordination polymer [Tl(LH)]_n ( 2 ). The complex was characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Crystal data for 2 at –80 °C: monoclinic, space group I2/a, a = 696.1(1), b = 1190.6(2), c = 931.0(2) pm, β = 103.28(1)°, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0256.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Crystal Structure of a New Coordination Polymer of Lead(II) Containing 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid

The reaction of solution 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid ( 1 ) and 2,2′‐Bipyridine with Pb(NO₃)₂ led to the coordination polymer [Pb(pydc)]_n ( 2 ) (pydcH₂ is 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid). This complex was characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal structure of 2 . Crystal data for 2 at ?80 °C: monoclinic, space group P2₁/n, a = 977.2(1), b = 554.0(1), c = 1425.3(2) pm, β = 104.75(1)°, Z = 4, R₁= 0.0261. The units [Pb(pydc)] form infinite chains along [010].     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of CeIII and BiIII Complexes and Solution Studies of ZnII,CdII, PbII,CeIII, and BiIII Complexes Obtained from Proton Transfer Compounds Containing 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylate Ion

The two complexes (pydaH)₂[Ce(pydc)₂(H₂O)₂]₂ · 2H₂O (1) and (phenH)₂[Bi(pydc)₂(H₂O)]₂ · 5H₂O (2) were prepared from the proton transfer compounds containing the 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylate ion. 1 was synthesized from the reaction of Ce(NO)₃ · 6H₂O with the proton transfer compound, (pydaH₂)(pydc), (pyda=2,6‐diaminopyridine, pydcH₂=2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid). 2 was synthesized from the reaction of proton transfer compound, (phenH)₂(pydc), (phen=1,10‐phenanthroline), with Bi(NO₃)₃ · 5H₂O. The characterization was carried out using IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The complex 1 crystallizes in the space group of the triclinic system, and contains two molecules per unit cell. The structure has been refined to a final value for the crystallographic R factor of 0.0342 based on 8851 reflections. The unit cell parameters are: a = 9.753(2) Å, b = 10.503(2) Å, c = 10.774(2) Å, α = 83.905(4)°, β = 88.089(4)°, and γ = 82.636(3)°. The crystal structure illustrates that cerium atoms are connected together through the four‐membered ring Ce₂O₂. 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylate fragment acts as a tridentate ligand. The molecular structure contains four (pydc)^2? ligands, two of which are bridge ligands linking the two central atoms. The complex 2 crystallizes in the space group of the triclinic system and contains two molecules per unit cell. The unit cell dimensions are: a = 8.8860(4) Å, b = 12.0132(6) Å, c = 13.0766(6) Å, α = 100.967(1)°, β = 96.681(1)° and γ = 94.191(1)°. The structure has been refined to a final value for the crystallographic R factor of 0.0471 based on 9576 reflections. In this complex, 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylate moiety has acted as a tridentate ligand and the lattice is composed of binuclear unit, [Bi(pydc)₂(H₂O)]₂^2?, (phenH)⁺ counter ions and five lattice waters. In both complexes hydrogen bonds, π‐π stacking and ion‐pairing play important roles in stabilizing the corresponding lattice. The stoichiometry and stability of the Zn^II, Cd^II, Pb^II, and Ce^III complexes with (pydaH₂)(pydc) in aqueous solution were investigated by potentiometric pH titration. The solution studies revealed that the stoichiometry of the crystalline complexes of the proton transfer system (pydaH₂)(pydc) with Ce^III, obtained in this study, and those with Zn^II, Cd^II and Pb^II, reported in our previous studies, are in close agreements. The complexation reactions of phen, pydc, and 2phen+pydc with Bi^III in aqueous solution were investigated by potentiometric pH titrations, and the equilibrium constants for all major complexes formed are described.     

Synthesis and X‐Ray Single Crystal Structure of Two New Copper Complexes with the Redox Active Ligand 1,10‐Phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione

The synthesis and the crystal structures of the complexes [Cu(L^I)₂](ClO₄) ( 1 ) and [Cu(L^I)(CH₃CN)₂(ClO₄)₂] ( 2 ) are reported. 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with the unit cell dimensions a = 13.169(4), b = 12.289(3), c = 14.732(3) Å, β = 109.03(2)° and Z = 4. Copper(I) is coordinated to four N atoms of the two 1,10‐Phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione (L^I) ligands with a two‐fold axis passing between the ligands. The copper(II) compound 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbn2₁ with unit cell dimensions of a = 7.498(5), b = 23.492(7), c = 12.363(4) Å and Z = 4. Copper(II) coordination can be described as a distorted octahedron with the N donor atoms of one L^I ligand and of two molecules of CH₃CN occupying the equatorial positions completed by two oxygen atoms of the two perchlorate molecules in the axial positions.     

Ion pairing, H-bonding, and π–π interactions in copper(II) complex-organo-networks derived from a proton-transfer compound of the 1,10-phenanthroline-2,9-dicarboxylic acid

The one-pot reaction between the novel proton transfer compound (pydaH₂)²⁺(phendc)²⁻, LH₂, and Cu(II) afforded the compounds (pydaH)₂[Cu(phendc)₂]·10H₂O, 1, and (pydaH)₂[Cu(phendc)(phendcH)]₂·5H₂O, 2, where pyda=2,6-diaminopyridine, and phendcH₂=1,10-phenanthroline-2,9-dicarboxylic acid. The single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of 1 and 2 revealed that these are two novel self-assembled 3D Cu(II) complex-organo-networks, in which (pydaH)⁺ ions and [Cu(phendc)₂]²⁻ or complex units are held together by ion pairing, H-bonding, and π–π interactions. Magnetic measurements over the temperature range 1.8–310 K revealed no significant magnetic coupling between Cu(II) centers in 1 or 2.     

Three Ternary Rare Earth(III) Complexes Based on 3‐[(4,6‐Dimethyl‐2‐pyrimidinyl)thio]‐propanoic Acid and 1,10‐Phenanthroline: Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Antioxidant Activity

Three ternary rare earth [Nd^III ( 1 ), Sm^III ( 2 ) and Y^III ( 3 )] complexes based on 3‐[(4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐pyrimidinyl)thio]‐propanoic acid (HL) and 1,10‐phenanthroline (Phen) were synthesized and characterized by IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, TGA, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structures showed that complexes 1 – 3 contain dinuclear rare earth units bridged by four propionate groups and are of general formula [REL₃(Phen)]₂ · nH₂O (for 1 and 2 : n = 2; for 3 : n = 0). All rare earth ions are nine‐coordinate with distorted mono‐capped square antiprismatic coordination polyhedra. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c with a = 16.241(7) Å, b = 16.095(7) Å, c = 19.169(6) Å, β = 121.48(2)°. Complex 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c with a = 16.187(5) Å, b = 16.045(4) Å, c = 19.001(4) Å, β = 120.956(18)°. Complex 3 crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group P1 with a = 11.390(6) Å, b = 13.636(6) Å, c = 15.958(7) Å, α = 72.310(17)°, β = 77.548(15)°, γ = 78.288(16)°. The antioxidant activity test shows that all complexes own higher antioxidant activity than free ligands.     

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of Copper(II) and Copper(I) dpp Complexes, [Cu(dpp)Br2] and [Cu(dpp)2][CuBr2] (dpp = 2,9‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline)

The complexes [Cu(dpp)Br₂] ( 1 ) and [Cu(dpp)₂][CuBr₂] ( 2 ) (dpp = 2,9‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) were synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods. Reaction of copper(II) bromide with the dpp ligand in dichloromethane at room temperature afforded 1 , which is a rare example of non‐square planar four‐coordinate copper(II) complexes. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a = 15.352(3), b = 13.192(3), c = 11.358(2) Å, β = 120.61(3)°, V = 1979.6(7) ų, Z = 4, D_calc = 1.865 g cm^?3. The coordination geometry about the copper center is distorted about halfway between square planar and tetrahedral. The Cu‐N distance is 2.032(2) Å and the Cu‐Br distance 2.3521(5) Å. Heating a CH₂Cl₂ or acetone solution of 1 resulted in complex 2 , which consists of a slightly distorted tetrahedral [Cu(dpp)₂]⁺ cation and a linear two‐coordinate [CuBr₂]^? anion. 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group with a = 10.445(2), b = 11.009(2), c = 18.458(4) Å, α = 104.72(3), β = 94.71(3), γ = 103.50(3)°, V = 1973.3(7) ų, Z = 2, D_calc = 1.602 g cm^?3. The four Cu(1)‐N distances are between 2.042(3) and 2.067(3) Å, the distance of Cu(2)‐Br(1) 2.2268(8) Å, and the disordered Cu(3)‐Br(2) distances are 2.139(7) and 2.237(4) Å, respectively. Complex 2 could also be prepared by directly reacting CuBr with dpp in CH₂Cl₂.     

Preparation of an Electrode That Immobilizes NAD‐Dependent Alcohol Dehydrogenase by Using a Redox Polymer Containing 1,10‐Phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione

A redox polymer (PAHA‐Ru), modified electrode exhibited excellent catalytic activity for the electrochemical oxidation of β‐nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). PAHA‐Ru was composed of carboxyl groups and ruthenium complexes containing 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione (phen‐dione). The stability of the PAHA‐Ru film was increased by incorporating poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA) owing to the formation of a polyelectrolyte complex between the PAHA‐Ru and PDDA. The catalytic efficiency of the oxidation of NADH using the PAHA‐Ru/PDDA‐modified electrode was also greater than that using a PAHA‐Ru‐modified electrode. NAD‐dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) was entrapped in the PAHA‐Ru/PDDA film on the surface of the glassy carbon electrode. Electrochemical oxidation of ethanol using the ADH‐entrapped electrode was also observed.     

3,4-二甲氧基苯乙酸邻菲啰啉镱(III)配合物的合成、晶体结构及荧光光谱

合成了3,4-二甲氧基苯乙酸邻菲啰啉镱(III)配合物(C84H82Yb2N4O24): [Yb2(DMPA)6(phen)2](HDMPA=3,4-二甲氧基苯乙酸(C12H12O4), phen=1,10-邻菲啰啉)(CCDC: 757541), 并通过元素分析、红外(IR)光谱、热重分析(TG-DTG)对其进行了表征, 用单晶X射线衍射测定了配合物的晶体结构. 配合物C84H82Yb2N4O24属三斜晶系, 空间群P1, 晶胞参数: a = 1.22877(14) nm, b=1.23235(16) nm, c=1.45234(19) nm, α=91.726(7)°, β=103.321(7)°, γ=113.885(6)°, 晶胞体积: V=1.9379(4) nm3, 晶胞内分子数Z=1, 相对分子质量Mr=1877.62, 电子数F(000)=946, 密度Dc=1.609 g·cm-3, 吸收系数μ(Mo Kα)=2.481 mm-1. 测定了铕和铽掺杂(2.5%, 5.0%, 10.0%, 摩尔分数)的配合物的荧光光谱, 结果表明, 单独的配体没有荧光, 在形成配合物后, 依然显示铕(III)离子和铽(III)离子的特征发射峰, 这表明配体将吸收的能量有效地转移给了中心离子, 配体起到了很好的敏化作用.     

Crystal Structures and Solution Studies of Two Novel Zinc(II) Complexes of a Proton Transfer Compound Obtained from 2, 6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid and 1, 10‐Phenanthroline: Observation of Strong Intermolecular Hydrogen Bonds

The proton transfer compound LH₂ , (phenH⁺)₂(pydc^2—), has been prepared from 1, 10‐phenanthroline, phen, and 2, 6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid, (dipicolinic acid), pydcH₂. Characterization was performed using solution and solid phase CP/MAS ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopy. The reactions of this adduct with ZnSO₄·7H₂O and Zn(NO₃)₂·4H₂O give the complexes, [Zn(pydc)₂][Zn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂]·7H₂O (1) and [Zn(phen)₃]₄(H(Hpydc)₂)(NO₃)₇·26H₂O (2) , respectively. These complexes were characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X‐ray analysis. The complexes crystallize in the triclinic space group P1 with Z = 2. The unit cell dimensions for complex 1 and 2 are: a = 9.9838(9) Å, b = 14.7483(13) Å, c = 14.8365(13) Å and a = 12.640(4) Å, b = 15.855(5) Å, c = 21.830(7) Å, respectively. In complex 1 (pydc^2—) and phen, are tri‐ and bidentate ligands, respectively, and an anionic [Zn(pydc)₂]^2— and cationic [Zn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ complex are formed simultaneously. In complex 2 , three phen participate in complexation leaving hydrogen‐bis(pyridine‐2‐carboxylate), (H(Hpydc)₂)^— as a supramolecular anion. The fragments (H(Hpydc)₂)^—, 7 NO₃^—, and 26 H₂O in complex 2 are joined together by extensive and strong H‐bonding; therefore, the structure is composed of [Zn(phen)₃]₄⁸⁺, and an anionic hydrogen bond supramolecular assembly with the formula, {(H(Hpydc)₂(NO₃)₇)^8— · 26H₂O}_n. The anionic species (H(Hpydc)₂)^— has a special position at the inversion center, as well as one of the NO₃^— anions, which is disordered over the inversion center. Most of the hydrogen bonds in complex 2 represent strong H‐bonding. The protonation constants of the building blocks of the pydc‐phen adduct, the equilibrium constants for the reaction of (pydc^2—) with phenanthroline and the stoichiometry and stability of the Zn^II complex with LH₂ on aqueous solution were determined by potentiometric pH titration. The solution study results support self‐association between (pydc^2—) and (phenH⁺) with a stoichiometry for the Zn(II) complex similar to that observed for the isolated crystalline complex.     

A Novel Proton Transfer Compound Containing 2, 6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid and Creatinine and its Zinc(II) Complex — Synthesis,Characterization, Crystal Structure,and Solution Studies

The 1:1 proton transfer compound LH₂, (creatH)⁺ (pydcH)^?, has been prepared from the reaction of creatinine, creat, and dipicolinic acid, pydcH₂, (2, 6‐ pyridinedicarboxylic acid) and characterized using IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The first coordination complex (creatH)[Zn(pydc)(pydcH)]·4H₂O, was prepared using LH₂ and zinc(II) nitrate, and characterized using IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X‐ray crystallography. The crystal system is triclinic with space group with two molecules per unit cell. The unit cell dimensions are a = 8.085(2) Å, b = 10.802(4) Å, c = 13.632(4) Å, α = 104.98(2)°, β = 90.31(2)° and γ = 92.55(3)°. The structure has been refined to a final value for the crystallographic R factor of 0.0381 based on 3003 reflections. The zinc atom is six‐coordinated with a distorted octahedral geometry. The (pydc)^2? and (pydcH)^? units are almost perpendicular to each other. Extensive hydrogen bondings between carboxylate groups, (creatH)⁺ and water molecules throughout the zinc(II) complex as well as π–π stacking and ion pairing play important roles in stabilizing the corresponding lattices. The protonation constants of the building blocks of the pydcH₂‐creat adduct, the equilibrium constants for the reaction of (pydc)^2? with creat and the stoichiometry and stability of the Zn^II complex with LH₂ in aqueous solution were accomplished by potentiometric pH titration. The solution studies support a self‐associated (creatH)⁺(pydcH)^? as the most abundant species at pH = 3.4. The stoichiometry of the crystalline complex (i.e. (creatH) [Zn(pydc)(pydcH)])and that of the most abundant species detected in solution were found the same.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Thermal Decomposition Process of Complex [Sm(BA)3phen]2

A binuclear samarium(III) complex with benzoic acid and 1,10‐phenanthroline, [Sm(BA)₃phen]₂ was synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, UV, IR and TG‐DTG techniques. The structure of the title complex was established by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal is triclinic, space group P1 with a = 10.8216(11) Å, b = 11.9129(13) Å, c = 12.425(2) Å, α = 105.007(2)°, β = 93.652(2)°, γ = 113.2630(10)°, Z = 1, D_c = 1.650 mg·m^?3, F(000) = 690. The carboxylate groups are bonded to the samarium ion in three modes: bidentate chelating, bidentate bridging, and tridentate chelating‐bridging. Each Sm³⁺ ion is coordinated to one bidentate chelating carboxylate group, two bidentate bridging and two tridentate chelating‐bridging carboxylate groups, as well as one 1,10‐phenanthroline molecule, forming a nine‐coordinate metal ion. Based on thermal analysis, the thermal decomposition process of [Sm(BA)₃phen]₂ has been derived.     

Synthesis,Characterization and Crystal Structures of new Coordination Polymers of Cerium(III) and Samarium(III) Containing 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid

The reaction of 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid ( 1 , LH₂) with CeCl₃·7H₂O and Sm(NO₃)₃·6H₂O in the presence of triethylamine led to the coordination polymer complexes [M(L)(LH)(H₂O)₂]·4H₂O [M = Ce ( 2 ) and Sm ( 3 )]. Both complexes were characterized by elemental analyses, IR spectroscopy and the crystal structures of 2 and 3 . Crystal data for 2 at ?80 °C: monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, a = 1404.6(1), b = 1122.1(1), c = 1296.1(1) pm, β = 102.09(1)°, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0217 and for 3 at ?80 °C: monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, a = 1395.1(1), b = 1120.1(1), c = 1282.8(1) pm, β = 102.71(1)°, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.019.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of a Complex of Melamine with Benzoic Acid

A new complex of melamine（MA） with benzoic acid（HBA） was prepared, affording [（HMA＋）（BA-）]-2H2O. Each HBA molecule is deprotonated and one triazine nitrogen atom of MA is protonated. The adjacent HMA＋ cations are related via an inverse center to form ribbons with a pair of N--H…N hydrogen bonds. COO- groups of BA- anions are hydrogen bonded to alternate sides of the （HMA＋）∞ ribbons to generate indention ID tapes, which are extended into a 3D structure via N--H…O- and N--H…OW hydrogen bonds and π-π stacking interactions. Predominant patterns of the hydrogen bond present in the complex are anion/water and amino/water tape structures. The hydrogen-bonding patterns consist of alternate 6, 10-membered rings sharing two edges. Infrared（IR） spectroscopy conforms that proton transfer has taken place in the complex.     

Synthesis and characterization of two isostructural 3d–4f coordination compounds based on pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylic acid and 4,4′‐bipyridine

The design and synthesis of 3d–4f heterometallic coordination polymers have attracted much interest due to the intriguing diversity of their architectures and topologies. Pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂pydc) has a versatile coordination mode and has been used to construct multinuclear and heterometallic compounds. Two isostructural centrosymmetric 3d–4f coordination compounds constructed from pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylic acid and 4,4′‐bipyridine (bpy), namely 4,4′‐bipyridine‐1,1′‐diium diaquabis(μ₂‐pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)tetrakis(pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bis[4‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)pyridinium]cobalt(II)dieuropium(III) octahydrate, (C₁₀H₁₀N₂)[CoEu₂(C₁₀H₉N₂)₂(C₇H₃NO₄)₆(H₂O)₂]·8H₂O, (I), and 4,4′‐bipyridine‐1,1′‐diium diaquabis(μ₂‐pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)tetrakis(pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bis[4‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)pyridinium]cobalt(II)diterbium(III) octahydrate, (C₁₀H₁₀N₂)[CoTb₂(C₁₀H₉N₂)₂(C₇H₃NO₄)₆(H₂O)₂]·8H₂O, (II), were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions and characterized by IR and fluorescence spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and powder X‐ray diffraction. Both compounds crystallize in the triclinic space group P. The Eu^III and Tb^III cations adopt nine‐coordinated distorted tricapped trigonal–prismatic geometries bridged by three pydc^2? ligands. The Co^II cation has a six‐coordination environment formed by two pydc^2? ligands, two bpy ligands and two coordinated water molecules. Adjacent molecules are connected by π–π stacking interactions to form a one‐dimensional chain, which is further extended into a three‐dimensional supramolecular network by multipoint hydrogen bonds.     

Mixed‐ligand Complexes with 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylato(2‐) and 4,7‐Diphenyl‐1,10‐Phenanthroline Ligands, [MII(pdc)(DPphen)(H2O)]·H2O (M = Co or Cu). Synthesis,Crystal Structures and Properties

Iso‐type [M^II(pdc)(DPphen)(H₂O]·H₂O compounds (M = Co or Cu, pdc = 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylato(2‐) ligand and DPphen = 4,7‐diphenyl‐1,10‐Phenanthroline) were synthesized and studied by X‐ray diffraction, thermal and spectral methods. The N,N′‐equatorial bidentate DPphen‐copper(II) chelation imposes a mer‐N(equatorial)+O₂(apical) conformation to pdc in the coordination polyhedron (type 4+1+1). In the Co(II) derivative, the coordination is of type 1+2+2+1 because of a lesser Jahn‐Teller distortion. In the crystals, π,π‐interligand interactions between phen ligands connect the complex molecules in multi‐stacked chains. Aqua···O(carboxyl) H‐bonding interactions reinforce the stacked chains and build double chains in 1D supramolecular structures parallel to the a axis. Non coordinated water connect these structures by H‐bonds.