Synthese eines hexanuklearen Calcium–Phosphor‐Käfigs über heteroleptische Calcium‐amid‐phosphanid‐Vorstufen

Synthesis of a Hexanuclear Calcium–Phosphorus‐Cage The metalation of tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphane with calcium bis[bis(trimethylsilyl)amide] yields the dimer {(Me₃Si)₂N–Ca(THF)[μ‐P(H)Si^tBu₃]}₂ ( 1 ). In THF monomerization occurs and dismutation reactions lead to the homoleptic compounds, namely (THF)₂Ca[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and (THF)₄Ca[P(H)Si^tBu₃]₂. In toluene, 1 undergoes dismutation reactions, bis(tetrahydrofuran)calcium bis[bis(trimethylsilyl)amide] is regained and [(Me₃Si)₂N–Ca(THF)]₂Ca[P(H)Si^tBu₃]₄ ( 2 ) precipitates. At raised temperatures, 2 undergoes a homometallic metalation with the loss of two equivalents of HN(SiMe₃)₂ and dimerizes. The thus formed cage compound (THF)₂Ca₆[PSi^tBu₃]₄[P(H)Si^tBu₃]₄ ( 3 ) with a central Ca₄P₄ heterocubane moiety crystallizes upon cooling of the toluene solution. The molecular structures of 2 and 3 were determined.     

Studien zur Reaktion von [Me2AlP(SiMe3)2]2 mit basenstabilisierten Organogalliumchloriden und ‐hydriden

Investigations on the Reactivity of [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with Base‐stabilized Organogalliumhalides and ‐hydrides [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 1 ) reacts with dmap?Ga(Cl)Me₂, dmap?Ga(Me)Cl₂, dmap?GaCl₃ and dmap?Ga(H)Me₂ with Al‐P bond cleavage and subsequent formation of heterocyclic [Me₂GaP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 2 ) as well as dmap?AlMe_xCl_3?x (x = 3 8 ; 2 3 ; 1 4 ; 0 5 ). The reaction between equimolar amounts of dmap?Al(Me₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ and dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)Cl yield dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ ( 6 ) and dmap?AlMe₂Cl ( 3 ). 2 – 8 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, 2 and 6 also by single crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthese,spektroskopische Charakterisierung und Molekülstrukturen ausgewählter Lewis‐Basen‐Addukte der Alkalimetall‐tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphanide

Synthesis, Spectroscopic Characterization, and Molecular Structures of Selected Lewis‐Base Adducts of the Alkali Metal Tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphanides The metalation of tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphane with butyllithium and the bis(trimethylsilyl)amides of sodium, potassium, and rubidium yields quantitatively the corresponding alkali metal tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphanides, which crystallize after addition of appropriate Lewis‐bases as dimeric (DME)LiP(H)SitBu₃ ( 1 ), chain‐like (DME)NaP(H)SitBu₃ ( 2 ), monomeric ([18]Krone‐6)KP(H)SitBu₃ ( 3 ), and dimeric (TMEDA)_1.5RbP(H)SitBu₃ ( 4 ). The reaction of H₂PSitBu₃ with cesium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide at room temperature gives monocyclic and tetrameric cesium tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphanide ( 5 ) with two additional coordinated CsN(SiMe₃)₂ molecules. At 80 °C this complex reacts with excess of phosphane to the tetrameric toluene adduct (η⁶‐Toluol)CsP(H)SitBu₃ ( 6 ) which contains a central Cs₄P₄‐heterocubane fragment. The constitution of these compounds was verified by X‐ray structure determinations.     

Ansa‐Complexes of [Mn(η5‐C5H5)(η6‐C6H6)]: Preparation,Characterization, and Reactivity of [n]Manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2, 3)

We report the synthesis of [n]manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2) featuring boron, silicon, germanium, and tin as ansa‐bridging elements. Their preparation was achieved by salt‐elimination reactions of the dilithiated precursor [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄Li)(η⁶‐C₆H₅Li)]?pmdta (pmdta=N,N,N′,N′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) with corresponding element dichlorides. Besides characterization by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, the identity of two single‐atom‐bridged derivatives, [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] and [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SiPh₂], could also be determined by X‐ray structural analysis. We investigated for the first time the reactivity of these ansa‐cyclopentadienyl–benzene manganese compounds. The reaction of the distannyl‐bridged complex [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)Sn₂tBu₄] with elemental sulfur was shown to proceed through the expected oxidative addition of the Sn?Sn bond to give a triatomic ansa‐bridge. The investigation of the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) capability of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] showed that an unexpected, unselective insertion into the C_ipso?Sn bonds of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] had occurred.     

Synthese und Struktur von Sr6P8‐Polyedern in gemischten Phosphaniden/Phosphandiiden des Strontiums

Synthesis and Structures of Sr₆P₈ Polyhedra in Mixed Phosphanides/Phosphandiides of Strontium The strontiation of H₂PSiⁱPr₃ ( 1 ) with (THF)₂Sr[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in THF yields colorless tetrakis(tetrahydrofuran‐O)strontium bis(triisopropylsilylphosphanide) ( 3 ). The central alkaline earth metal atom has an octahedral environment with the phosphanide ligands in trans position. The homometalation in toluene leads to the elimination of 1 and THF. Cooling of this solution gives crystals of colorless tetrakis(tetrahydrofuran‐O)hexastrontium‐tetrakis(triisopropylsilylphosphanide)‐tetrakis(triisopropylsilylphosphandiide) ( 4 ). The equimolar reaction of H₂PSi^tBu₃ ( 2 ) with (THF)₂Sr[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in toluene yields in the first step heteroleptic dimeric {(Me₃Si)₂NSr(THF)₂[P(H)Si^tBu₃]}₂ ( 5 )₂. This compounds monomerizes in THF to (Me₃Si)₂N–Sr(THF)₄[P(H)Si^tBu₃] ( 6 ), which forms an equilibrium with the homoleptic dismutation products (THF)₂Sr[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and (THF)₄Sr[P(H)Si^tBu₃]₂ ( 7 ). Compound ( 5 )₂ undergoes a intramolecular strontiation and bis(tetrahydrofuran‐O)hexastrontium‐tetrakis[tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphanide]‐tetrakis[tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphandiide] ( 8 ) is isolated. The central Sr₆P₈‐polyhedra of 4 and 8 are very similar.     

Lithiated Stannasilanes – Building Blocks for Monocyclic Si–Sn Rings

Dilithiated di(stannyl)oligosilanes (^tBu₂Sn(Li)– (SiMe₂)_n–Sn(Li)^tBu₂; 4 , n = 2; 5 , n = 3) were synthesized by the reaction of lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) with the α,ω‐hydrido tin substituted oligosilanes (^tBu₂Sn(H)– (SiMe₂)_n–Sn(H)^tBu₂; 1 , n = 2; 2 , n = 3). Surprisingly, the reaction of 1 and 3 (^tBu₂Sn(H)–(SiMe₂)₄–Sn(H)^tBu₂) with LDA resulted not in the formation of the lithiated compound, but what one can find is the formation of the 5,5‐ditert.butyl‐octamethyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetrasila‐5‐stannacyclopentane ( 8 ) (n = 4) in addition to the expected product 4 (n = 4) and the 3,3,6,6‐tetratert.butyl‐octamethyl‐1,2,4,5‐tetrasila‐3,6‐distannacyclohexane ( 7 ) (n = 3). Reactions of 4 and 5 with dimethyl and diphenyldichlorosilanes yielding monocyclic Si–Sn derivatives ( 9 – 11 ) are also discussed. The solid‐state structures of 7 and 11 were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

[Mn4Br(CH=CMe2)3(μ3‐NPEt3)4] — ein 2‐Methyl‐prop‐1‐enyl‐Phosphaniminato‐Komplex von Mangan(II) mit Heterokubanstruktur

[Mn₄Br(CH=CMe₂)₃(μ₃‐NPEt₃)₄] — a 2‐Methyl‐prop‐1‐enyl‐Phosphoraneiminato Complex of Manganese(II) with Heterocubane Structure [Mn₄Br(CH=CMe₂)₃(μ₃‐NPEt₃)₄] ( 1 ) has been prepared from [MnBr(μ₃‐NPEt₃)]₄ and BrMg(CH=CMe₂) in thf solution and subsequent extraction of the solvent‐free residue with n‐hexane. 1 forms red single crystals from diethylether solution, which are characterized by a crystal structure determination. Space group P1¯, Z = 2, lattice dimensions at —80 °C: a = 1144.7(1), b = 1411.3(2), c = 1521.8(2) pm, α = 91.581(14), β = 90.163(14), γ = 91.947(14)°, R₁ = 0.0448. 1 exhibits a Mn₄N₄ heterocubane core, a terminally coordinated bromine ligand and three Mn—CH=CMe₂ groups with M—C bond lengths of 213.8 pm on average.     

Komplexchemie P‐reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XXII. Die Bildung von [η2‐{tBu–P=P–SiMe3}Pt(PR3)2]aus (Me3Si)tBuP–P=P(Me)tBu2 und [η2‐{C2H4}Pt(PR3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXII. The Formation of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂] from (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ and [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P = P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] yielding [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂]. However, there is no indication for an isomer which would be the analogue to the well known [η²‐{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂]. The syntheses and NMR data of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PMe₃)₂] as well as the results of the single crystal structure determination of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] are reported.     

Strukturen zweifach metallierter Derivate von 3, 3‐Dimethyl‐1, 5‐bis(trimethylsilyl)‐1, 5‐diaza‐pentan mit Lithium und Aluminium sowie zweier Donor‐substituierter Digallane

Structural Characterization of Bis(metallated) Derivatives of 3, 3‐Dimethyl‐1, 5‐bis(trimethylsilyl)‐1, 5‐diaza‐pentane with Lithium and Aluminum and of two Donor‐substituted Digallanes The diaminopropane derivative Me₂C[CH₂N(H)SiMe₃]₂ is metallated with n‐butyllithium and lithium tetrahydridoaluminate to obtain Me₂C[CH₂N(Li)SiMe₃]₂ and Me₂C[CH₂N(Li)SiMe₃][CH₂N(AlH₂)SiMe₃], respectively. Both compounds exhibit a central eight‐membered ring, Li₄N₄ or Li₂Al₂N₄. Me₂C[CH₂N(Li)SiMe₃]₂ reacts with Ga₂Cl₄ · 2dioxane under formation of the corresponding tetra(amino)digallane. This is monomeric, in contrast to a dimeric tetraalkoxy‐substituted digallane, Ga₄O^tBu₈. All compounds were characterized by single crystal X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthese und Strukturen von Yttrium‐tris[bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanid] und 1, 1', 3, 3'‐Tetrakis(trimethylsilyl)yttrocen‐tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphanid

The metalation of HP(SiMe₃)₂ with Y[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₃ gives the homoleptic {Y[P(SiMe₃)₂]₃}₂ (1) which crystallizes from toluene in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. The yttrium atoms are in a distorted tetrahedral environment with Y‐P bond lengths of 267.7 and 284.8 pm to the terminal and bridging substituents, respectively. The metathesis reaction of [1, 3‐(Me₃Si)₂C₅H₃]₂YCl with KPSitBu₃ yields (tetrahydrofuran‐O)‐1, 1', 3, 3'‐tetrakis(trimethylsilyl)yttrocene‐tri(tert‐butyl)silylphosphanide ( 2 ). The molecular structure of 2 in solution was deduced by NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography. The coupling constants ¹J(Y, P) and ¹J(P, H) show values of 144.0 Hz and 201.0 Hz, respectively.     

Monomeric Homoleptic (2‐Pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amido Complexes of the Divalent Metals Mg,Mn, Fe,Co, and Zn

The transamination reaction of M[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amine yields the corresponding homoleptic metal bis[(2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amides] of Mg ( 1 ), Mn ( 2 ), Fe ( 3 ), Co ( 4 ) and Zn ( 5 ). All these compounds crystallize from hexane isotypic in the space group C2/c. From toluene the zinc derivative precipitates as toluene solvate 5 ·toluene. The molecular structures of these compounds are very similar with large NMN angles to the amide nitrogen atoms with NMN values of 148° ( 1 ) and 150° ( 5 ) for the diamagnetic compounds and 156° for the paramagnetic derivatives 2 and 3 . The Co derivative 4 displays a rather small NCoN angle of 142°. Different synthetic routes have been explored for compound 3 which is also available via the metallation reaction of bis(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)iron with (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amine and via the metathesis reaction of lithium (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amide with [(thf)₂FeCl₂]. In course of the metathesis reaction, an equimolar amount of lithium (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amide and [(thf)₂FeCl₂] yields heteroleptic (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amido iron(II) chloride ( 6 ) which crystallizes as a centrosymmetric dimeric molecule. The oxidative C‐C coupling reaction of 5 with Sn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ leads to the formation of tin(II) 1,2‐bis(2‐pyridyl)‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane, tin metal and Zn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂.     

Synthesis and Molecular Structure of [n‐Bu2(F)SnOSn(F)t‐Bu2]2 — an Unsymmetrically Substituted Tetraorganodistannoxane

The dimeric tetraorganodistannoxane [n‐Bu₂(F)SnOSn(F)t‐Bu₂]₂ ( 1 ) was prepared by the reaction of (t‐Bu₂SnO)₃ with n‐Bu₂SnF₂ and characterized in solution by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and ESI MS spectrometry and in the solid state by ¹¹⁹Sn MAS NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

K and Ba distribution in the structures of the clathrate compounds KxBa16−x(Ga,Sn)136 (x = 0.8, 4.4, and 12.9) and KxBa8−x(Ga,Sn)46 (x = 0.3)

Studies of the K–Ba–Ga–Sn system produced the clathrate compounds K_0.8(2)Ba_15.2(2)Ga_31.0(5)Sn_105.0(5) [a = 17.0178 (4) Å], K_4.3(3)Ba_11.7(3)Ga_27.4(4)Sn_108.6(4) [a = 17.0709 (6) Å] and K_12.9(2)Ba_3.1(2)Ga_19.5(4)Sn_116.5(4) [a = 17.1946 (8) Å], with the type‐II structure (cubic, space group Fdm), and K_7.7(1)Ba_0.3(1)Ga_8.3(4)Sn_37.7(4) [a = 11.9447 (4) Å], with the type‐I structure (cubic, space group Pmn). For the type‐II structures, only the smaller (Ga,Sn)₂₄ pentagonal dodecahedral cages are filled, while the (Ga,Sn)₂₈ hexakaidecahedral cages remain empty. The unit‐cell volume is directly correlated with the K:Ba ratio, since an increasing amount of monovalent K occupying the cages causes a decreasing substitution of the smaller Ga in the framework. All three formulae have an electron count that is in good agreement with the Zintl–Klemm rules. For the type‐I compound, all framework sites are occupied by a mixture of Ga and Sn atoms, with Ga showing a preference for Wyckoff site 6c. The (Ga,Sn)₂₀ pentagonal dodecahedral cages are occupied by statistically disordered K and Ba atoms, while the (Ga,Sn)₂₄ tetrakaidecahedral cages encapsulate only K atoms. Large anisotropic displacement parameters for K in the latter cages suggest an off‐centering of the guest atoms.     

Synthetic and Structural Studies on the Cyclic Bis(amino)stannylenes Sn[(NR)2C10H6‐1, 8] and their Reactions with SnCl2 or Si[(NCH2But)2C6H4‐1, 2] (R = SiMe3 or CH2But)

Treatment of {HNR}₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8 [R = SiMe₃ ( 1 ), CH₂Bu^t ( 2 )] with Sn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ afforded the cyclic stannylene Sn[{NR}₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8] [R = SiMe₃ ( 3 ), CH₂Bu^t ( 4 )]. From 3 and SnCl₂ in THF and crystallisation from toluene, the product was the crystalline tetracyclic compound ( 5 ) as the (toluene)_0.5‐solvate. Reaction of 4 with the silylene Si[(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₆H₄‐1, 2] ( 6 ) [abbreviated as Si(NN)] in benzene and crystallisation in presence of Et₂O furnished the crystalline tricyclic complex Sn[{Si(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₆H₄‐1′, 2′}₂‐{(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8}] ( 7 ) as the Et₂O‐solvate. Complex 5 slowly dissociated into its factors 3 and SnCl₂ in toluene, but rapidly in THF. Solutions of 7 in C₆D₆, C₇D₈ or THF‐d₈, studied by multinuclear, variable temperature NMR spectroscopy, revealed the presence of an equilibrium between 8 (an isomer of 7 , in which the skeletal atoms of the eight‐membered ring were , rather than the of 7 ) and 4 + 2 Si(NN), with 8 dominant in PhMe but not in THF; additionally 8 was shown to be fluxional and solutions of 8 in C₆D₆ or C₇D₈ decomposed to give the silane Si(NN)[(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8], 6 and Sn metal. The X‐ray structures of 3 , 5 and 7 are presented.     

Reaktionen von (tBu)2P?PP(Br)tBu2 mit LiP(SiMe3)2, LiPMe2 und LiMe,LitBu, LinBu

Reactions of (tBu)₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ with LiP(SiMe₃)₂, LiPMe₂ and LiMe, LitBu and LinBu The reactions of (tBu)₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 1 with LiP(SiMe₃)₂ 2 yield (Me₃Si)₂P? P(SiMe₃)₂ 4 and P[P(tBu)₂]₂P(SiMe₃)₂ 5 , whereas 1 with LiPMe₂ 2 yields P₂Me₄ 6 and P[(tBu)₂]₂PMe₂ 7 . 1 with LiMe yields the ylid tBu₂P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ (main product) and [tBu₂P]₂PMe 15 . In the reaction of 1 with tBuLi [tBu₂P]₂PH 11 is the main product and also tBuP? P?P(R)tBu₂ 21 is formed. The reaction of 1 with nBuLi leads to [tBu₂P]₂PnBu 17 (main product) and tBu₂P? P?P(nBu)tBu₂ 22 (secondary product).     

Reaktionen von tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2 mit (Et3P)2NiCl2 und [{η2‐C2H4}Ni(PEt3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXIII. Reactions of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ and [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ ( 1 ) forms with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ ( 2 ) and Na(Nph) the [μ‐(1,3 : 2,3‐η‐^tBu₂P₄^tBu₂){Ni(PEt₃)Cl}₂] ( 3 ) as main product. Using Na/Hg instead as reducing agent the Ni⁰ compounds [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 4 ), [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 5 ) and [(Et₃P)Ni(μ‐P^tBu₂)]₂ ( 6 ) with four‐membered Ni₂P₂ ring result. [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] yields with 1 also 4 . The compounds were characterized by ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR investigations and 3 also by a single crystal X‐ray analysis. It crystallizes triclinic in the space group P 1 with a = 1129.4(2), b = 1256.8(3), c = 1569.5(3) pm, α = 72.44(3)°, β = 70.52(3)° and γ = 74.20(3)°.     

Heterodinukleare Komplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)4(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)3(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [CoRh(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)]

Heterobinuclear Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], and [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] [Ru₃Rh(CO)₇(μ₃‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂(^tBu₂PH)(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 2 ) yields by cluster degradation under CO pressure as main product the heterobinuclear complex [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 4 ). The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pcab with a = 15.6802(15), b = 28.953(3), c = 11.8419(19) Å and V = 5376.2(11) ų. The reaction of 4 with dppm (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) in THF at room temperature affords in good yields [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 7 ). 7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 9.7503(19), b = 13.399(3), c = 15.823(3) Å and V = 1854.6 ų. Moreover single crystals of [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 9 ) could be obtained and the single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis revealed that 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/a with a = 11.611(2), b = 13.333(2), c = 18.186(3) Å and V = 2693.0(8) ų.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Self‐assembly syntheses and crystal structures of dimeric di‐n‐butyltin phosphates containing eight‐membered Sn2O4P2 inorganic ring

Two organotin (IV) derivatives, [Bu₂‐ Sn(HO₃PO‐i‐Pr)₂]₂ ( 1 ) and [Bu₂Sn(HO₃POPh)₂]₂ ( 2 ), have been prepared by reactions of di‐n‐butyltin oxide with the phenylphosphoric acid and isopropylphosphoric acid, respectively. Characterization of the complexes 1 and 2 was achieved using elemental analysis, IR, NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, and ¹¹⁹Sn) spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography diffraction analysis. The X‐ray data reveal that complexes 1 and 2 are dimers containing eight‐membered Sn₂O₄P₂ inorganic ring. Interestingly, complexes 1 and 2 are further linked into 2D network through intermolecular O … Sn weak contacts and O H … O weak hydrogen‐bonding interactions. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 21:298–303, 2010; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/hc.20610     

Kristallstrukturen,spektroskopische Charakterisierung und Normalkoordinatenanalyse von (n‐Bu4N)2[M(ECN)4] (M = Pd,Pt; E = S,Se)

Crystal Structures, Spectroscopic Analysis, and Normal Coordinate Analysis of ( n ‐Bu₄N)₂[M(ECN)₄] (M = Pd, Pt; E = S, Se) The reaction of (NH₄)₂[PdCl₄] or K₂[PtCl₄] with KSCN or KSeCN in aqueous solutions yields the complex anions [Pd(SCN)₄]^2–, [Pt(SCN)₄]^2– and [Pt(SeCN)₄]^2–, which are converted into (n‐Bu₄N) salts with (n‐Bu₄N)HSO₄. (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pd(SeCN)₄] is formed by treatment of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[PdCl₄] with (n‐Bu₄N)SeCN in acetone. X‐ray structure determinations on single crystals of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pd(SCN)₄] (monoclinic, space group P2₁/n, a = 13.088(3), b = 12.481(2), c = 13.574(3) Å, β = 91.494(15)°, Z = 2), (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pd(SeCN)₄] (monoclinic, space group P2₁/n, a = 13.171(2), b = 12.644(2), c = 13.560(2) Å, β = 91.430(11)°, Z = 2) and (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pt(SeCN)₄] (monoclinic, space group P2₁/n, a = 13.167(2), b = 12.641(1), c = 13.563(2) Å, β = 91.516(18)°, Z = 2) reveal, that the compounds crystallize isotypically and the complex anions are centrosymmetric and approximate planar. In the Raman spectra the metal ligand stretching modes of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pd(SCN)₄] ( 1 ) and (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pt(SCN)₄] ( 3 ) are observed in the range of 260–303 cm^–1 and of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pd(SeCN)₄] ( 2 ) and (n‐Bu₄N)₂[Pt(SeCN)₄] ( 4 ) in the range of 171–195 cm^–1. The IR and Raman spectra are assigned by normal coordinate analysis using the molecular parameters of the X‐ray determination. The valence force constants are f_d(PdS) = 1.17, f_d(PdSe) = 1.17, f_d(PtS) = 1.44 and f_d(PtSe) = 1.42 mdyn/Å. The ⁷⁷Se NMR resonances are 23 for 2 , –3 for 4 and the ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR resonances 549 for 3 and 130 ppm for 4 .