Developments in the use of chromatographic techniques in marine laboratories for the determination of halogenated contaminants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Chromatography has been an important tool in marine laboratories. Since the 1960s, marine laboratories have been involved in the analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and brominated flame retardants (BFRs). Column chromatography and liquid chromatography (LC) techniques have been used, mainly in the clean-up phase, while gas chromatography (GC) has been used extensively in the final determination of these contaminants. Developments have been observed from the use of packed GC columns, via capillary columns to the use of heart-cut multi-dimensional GC and comprehensive multi-dimensional GC. The progress made in interlaboratory studies and the availability of certified reference materials are discussed.     

EAL interlaboratory comparison Wa1 – Testing of potable water

 The accreditation of laboratories has emphasized the use of interlaboratory comparisons as a tool to monitor the comparability and accuracy of results laboratories produce. An interlaboratory comparison for water laboratories was organized among European Cooperation for Accreditation (EA) member countries; 30 laboratories, 7 of which were not accredited, from 14 European countries participated in this intercomparison. All the laboratories were chosen by the appropriate national accreditation bodies, with the instruction to select as participants those laboratories which act as national reference laboratories in this field. About 90% of the data collected was considered satisfactory after statistical treatment. Non-accredited laboratories performed as well as accredited laboratories. The laboratories were asked to take corrective action and report the corrections to the accreditation bodies. A great variation in the reported uncertainties of the results was observed. There seems to be a need to organize EA interlaboratory comparisons for national reference laboratories analysing water. It is obvious that even reference laboratories need training in how to estimate the uncertainty of results. Received: 22 July 1998 · Accepted: 21 September 1998     

Assessment of performance of laboratories in determining acrylamide in crispbread

A proficiency testing round was undertaken to assess the performance of laboratories to measure acrylamide in a sample of crispbread. Retail samples of crispbread were ground to a fine powder and after thorough mixing were packed in 40 g units for distribution. Ten samples were selected at random and analyzed in duplicate for acrylamide by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Standard statistical tests showed that the material was homogeneous for the purposes of proficiency testing. Test samples were distributed to 55 laboratories in 16 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and the Middle East. The results were analyzed by standard proficiency testing statistical procedures, and laboratories were awarded z-scores on the basis of their reported results. Based on a target standard deviation (sigmap value) taken from the Horwitz equation, for a robust mean value of 1.2 mg/kg acrylamide, satisfactory results (z-score within +/- 2 for those between 0.8 and 1.6 mg/kg) were obtained by 86% of the 37 laboratories that returned results. Only 1 laboratory was unsatisfactory and 4 had questionable results. About equal numbers of laboratories used gas chromatography (GC)/MS and LC/MS procedures with about 25% using MS/MS and one using GC with electron capture detection. There was no evident trend in performance or bias in results. GC/MS and LC/MS data were evenly distributed across the population of laboratories reporting results.     

Interlaboratory GC/MS response factor precision

A quality control procedure for Fused Silica Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy (FSCC GC/MS) was tested and shown to produce similar response factors at five Spectroscopy (FSCC GC/MS) was tested and shown to produce similar response factors at five laboratories. The average relative standard deviation (RSD) of interlaboratory response factors for fifty three compounds of environmental interest determined at each laboratory at nominal injected weights of 20, 100, and 200 ng was found to be 18.9% for four of the five laboratories which participated in this work. These data demonstrate that similar response factors can be attained in routine GC/MS measurements when adequate quality control is maintained.     

Interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of methyl tert-butyl ether in water

This is the first publication which describes the evaluation of the analytical performance and state-of-the-art of the determination of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in water at ng L^–1 concentrations. An interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of MTBE in water was carried out. Twenty-eight laboratories from seven European countries participated in the study. Twenty of those finally transmitted results to the organiser. Italian spring water, containing no detectable amounts of MTBE was fortified to yield two samples with MTBE concentrations of 0.074±0.004 µg L^–1 and 0.256±0.010 µg L^–1. The laboratories applied their regular in-house methods to analyse the water samples. Static headspace, Purge & Trap, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) or direct aqueous injection were used as sample preparation techniques. Subsequent separation and detection of MTBE were performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or gas chromatography/flame ionisation detection (GC/FID). After rejection of outliers, the overall arithmetic mean of laboratory results corresponded to recoveries of 78±20% (Sample A) and 88±20% (Sample B) of the reference concentrations. The between laboratory coefficients of variation (CV) were 32% and 31%, respectively. The organisation of the study and quality assurance measures at the organiser's laboratory are described. Moreover, the measurement results of the participants and the analytical methods used for the determination of MTBE are presented and the correlation between selected method parameters and data quality is discussed.     

Toward an international standard for PCR-based detection of foodborne Escherichia coli O157: validation of the PCR-based method in a multicenter interlaboratory trial

The performance of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for detection of Escherichia coli O157, previously validated on DNA extracted from pure cultures, was evaluated on spiked cattle swabs through an interlaboratory trial, including 12 participating laboratories from 11 European countries. Twelve cattle swab samples, spiked at 4 levels (0, 1-10, 10-100, and 100-1000 colony-forming units, in triplicate) with E. coli O157 were prepared centrally in the originating laboratory; the receiving laboratories performed pre-PCR treatment followed by PCR. The results were reported as positive when the correct amplicons were present after gel electrophoresis. The statistical analysis, performed on 10 sets of reported results, determined the diagnostic sensitivity to be 92.2%. The diagnostic specificity was 100%. The accordance (repeatability) was 90.0%, calculated from all positive inoculation levels. The concordance (reproducibility) was 85.0%, calculated from all positive inoculation levels. The concordance odds ratio (degree of interlaboratory variation calculated from all positive inoculation levels) was 1.58, indicating the robustness of the PCR method. Thus, the interlaboratory variation due to personnel, reagents, minor temperature or pH fluctuations and, not least, thermal cyclers, did not affect the performance of the method, which is currently being considered as part of an intenational PCR standard.     

Proficiency testing as a tool for implementing internal quality control: the case of ochratoxin A in cocoa powder

This paper describes the interlaboratory study aimed at assessing the performance of 18 laboratories (14 national and 4 European) for Ochratoxin A (OTA) determination in cocoa powder samples. The study was tested at three levels of OTA covering the range in which presumably European regulatory limits could fall in the near future. For the extraction step, almost all laboratories used an aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen carbonate with the exception of one laboratory using dichloromethane consistently with the ELISA procedure adopted in the study. The clean-up step was performed by utilizing the immunoaffinity columns by the two main manufacturers (R-Biopharm Rhone and VICAM) and for the quantitative analysis, HPLC was used by all the participants except one using ELISA. From the output of the study, it can be concluded that at low level (0.19 μg/kg) 10 out of 18 (56%), at medium level (0.45 μg/kg) 11 out of 18 (61%), and at high level (1.45 μg/kg) 12 out of 18 (67%) results fell within the satisfactory ranges. This interlaboratory study provides an estimate of the performance of national and European laboratories involved in OTA determination in cocoa powder samples, which sounds extremely valuable in view of potential future legislation by the European Commission.     

IMEP in support of the comparability of measurement results across the Romanian chemical metrology infrastructure

On the basis of quantitative chemical measurements many important decisions are made in support of legislation or in industrial processes or social aspects. For this reason it is important to improve the quality of chemical measurement results and thus make them comparable and acceptable everywhere. The measurement quality is important to enable an equivalent implementation of the European Union regulations and directives across an enlarged EU. In this context, the European Commission–Joint Research Centre–Institute for Reference Materials and Measurement (EC-JRC-IRMM) set up a programme to improve the scientific basis for metrology in chemistry (MiC) in EU candidate countries in the framework of EU enlargement. Several activities were initiated, such as training, fellowships, sponsoring of seminars, conferences and participation in interlaboratory comparisons. To disseminate measurement traceability, IRMM provides through its International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) an interlaboratory tool to enable the benchmarking of laboratory performance. IMEP emphasizes the metrological aspects of measurement results, such as traceability and measurement uncertainty. In this way it has become a publicly available European tool for MiC. The Romanian Bureau of Legal Metrology – National Institute of Metrology (BRML-INM) actively supports the participation of Romanian authorized and field laboratories in IMEP interlaboratory comparisons. This paper describes the interest of Romanian laboratories participating in this programme, the analytical and metrological problems that became relevant during these exercises and some actions for improvement. The results from Romanian laboratories participating in IMEP-12 (water), IMEP-16 (wine), IMEP-17 (human serum) and IMEP-20 (tuna fish) are presented. To conclude, the educational and training activities at national level organized jointly by the Romanian National Institute of Metrology (INM) and IRMM are also mentioned.     

Interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water

Sixty laboratories of five different countries participated in a large-scale interlaboratory comparison test for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water. Participants used their in-house method with 44 laboratories applying head space GC ECD analysis and 5 using liquid/liquid extraction. A set of two artificially produced samples was prepared; the halogenated hydrocarbons investigated were trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloromethane, tetrachloromethane, 1,1-dichloroethylene, dichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, bromodichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane and tribromomethane. The procedure of sample preparation, storage and distribution was monitored by an extensive quality assurance system including homogeneity tests, stability tests, and trend analysis of the submitted data. The analytical results submitted by the participants exhibited RSD values of up to 35% and outlier rates of up to 19%. The percentage of false positive and false negative results was at the highest 12% for selected substances. Recovery rates varying from 86% to 106% proved the correctness of the analytical results submitted by the participants and showed that the procedure developed in this study for sample preparation and distribution is well suited for the performance of large-scale interlaboratory comparison tests of halogenated hydrocarbons in water.     

Validation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect the triggering proteins and peptides for celiac disease: interlaboratory study

The performance of Gluten-Tec (EuroProxima, Arnhem, The Netherlands) was tested through an interlaboratory study in accordance with AOAC guidelines. Gluten-Tec is a competitive ELISA that detects an immunostimulatory epitope of a-gliadin in dietary food for celiacs. Fifteen laboratories, representing 14 different countries, announced their interest in taking part in this study. Of the 12 laboratories that sent the results within the established timeframe, two submitted inappropriate standard curves and were excluded from the statistical analysis. Four different food matrixes (rice-based baby food, maize bread, chocolate cake mix, and beer) were selected for preparing the test samples. Two gliadin extraction procedures were used: the conventional 60% ethanol, and a new method based on the reducing reagent dithiothreitol. The 38 samples (19 blind duplicates) tested in this study were prepared by diluting the different extracts in order to cover a wide range of gliadin levels. Both sample extraction and dilution were performed by EuroProxima; the present interlaboratory study was focused only on testing the ELISA part of the Gluten-Tec kit protocol. Repeatability values (within-laboratory variance), expressed as RSD(r) ranged from 6.2 to 25.7%, while reproducibility values (interlaboratory variance), expressed as RSD(R), ranged from 10.6 to 45.9%. Both statistical parameters were in the acceptable range of ELISAs under these conditions, and the method will be presented to the Codex Alimentarius as a preferred method for gluten analysis.     

Consideration concerning interlaboratory test for cement in the last 20 years

Since 1988, over 40 laboratories representing research institutes, cement plants, pre-cast units, hydro plant construction companies, industrial construction companies, building companies, etc. from nine countries—Romania, Republic of Moldova, Croatia, Serbia, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Ukraine and Lebanon—take part every year in an interlaboratory test organized by our laboratory. The subject of the interlaboratory test for cement was 37 laboratory tests: 12 chemical determinations, 7 physical tests and 9 mechanical tests carried out with 2 types of sand, from CEPROCIM and from each participant laboratory. The paper presents the evolution of two statistical parameters (standard deviation of reproducibility and/or coefficient of variation) for a period of 20 years and for 11 laboratory tests. The results strongly prove that interlaboratory test is one of the most efficient tools to establish a common language for all the participant laboratories performing cement testing procedures.     

Interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water

Sixty laboratories of five different countries participated in a large-scale interlaboratory comparison test for the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in water. Participants used their in-house method with 44 laboratories applying head space GC ECD analysis and 5 using liquid/liquid extraction. A set of two artificially produced samples was prepared; the halogenated hydrocarbons investigated were trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloromethane, tetrachloromethane, 1,1-dichloroethylene, dichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, bromodichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane and tribromomethane. The procedure of sample preparation, storage and distribution was monitored by an extensive quality assurance system including homogeneity tests, stability tests, and trend analysis of the submitted data. The analytical results submitted by the participants exhibited RSD values of up to 35% and outlier rates of up to 19%. The percentage of false positive and false negative results was at the highest 12% for selected substances. Recovery rates varying from 86% to 106% proved the correctness of the analytical results submitted by the participants and showed that the procedure developed in this study for sample preparation and distribution is well suited for the performance of large-scale interlaboratory comparison tests of halogenated hydrocarbons in water. Received: 7 December 1998 / Revised: 23 March 1999 / Accepted: 24 March 1999     

Measurement of PAHs in environmental matrices: results from an interlaboratory comparison on the different steps of the measurement procedure

Proficiency testing (PT) is becoming a feature of laboratory accreditation and the PT results are used to assess the technical competence of the participating laboratories. ISPRA (former APAT) plays an important role in supporting the Italian laboratories belonging to the network of the Regional Environmental Agencies to improve the quality of their analytical measurements. As a consequence, ISPRA organized an interlaboratory comparison to assess the performance of the laboratories on PAH measurement procedure. The interlaboratory comparison was drawn separating the different steps of the measurement (from the extraction to the instrumental measurement). Two matrix reference materials: (1) a polluted soil and (2) an extract reference material of the same polluted soil and a “blind” PAH mixture standard stock solution were distributed to 59 Italian laboratories. The results of interlaboratory comparison showed a significant dispersion of the PAH measurements that masks the effects of the different extraction and cleanup procedures used, but it is consistent with the results of other European interlaboratory comparisons.     

Multicenter validation of PCR-based method for detection of Salmonella in chicken and pig samples

As part of a standardization project, an interlaboratory trial including 15 laboratories from 13 European countries was conducted to evaluate the performance of a noproprietary polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for the detection of Salmonella on artificially contaminated chicken rinse and pig swab samples. The 3 levels were 1-10, 10-100, and 100-1000 colony-forming units (CFU)/100 mL. Sample preparations, including inoculation and pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water (BPW), were performed centrally in a German laboratory; the pre-PCR sample preparation (by a resin-based method) and PCR assay (gel electrophoresis detection) were performed by the receiving laboratories. Aliquots of BPW enrichment cultures were sent to the participants, who analyzed them using a thermal lysis procedure followed by a validated Salmonella-specific PCR assay. The results were reported as negative or positive. Outlier results caused, for example, by gross departures from the experimental protocol, were omitted from the analysis. For both the chicken rinse and the pig swab samples, the diagnostic sensitivity was 100%, with 100% accordance (repeatability) and concordance (reproducibility). The diagnostic specificity was 80.1% (with 85.7% accordance and 67.5% concordance) for chicken rinse, and 91.7% (with 100% accordance and 83.3% concordance) for pig swab. Thus, the interlaboratory variation due to personnel, reagents, thermal cyclers, etc., did not affect the performance of the method, which will be proposed as part of a developing international PCR standard.     

Validation of an immunoassay for detection and quantitation of a genetically modified soybean in food and food fractions using reference materials: interlaboratory study

An immunoassay for detection of a specific genetically modified soybean (Roundup-Ready) was validated on dried soybean powder in an interlaboratory study. Different percentages of genetically modified soybeans in nonmodified soybean matrix were evaluated in a blind study. Thirty-eight laboratories from 13 countries participated. The immunoassay was evaluated for 2 endpoints: (1) To give a semiquantitative result, i.e., determination of a given sample above or below a given threshold, or (2) to compute a quantitative result, i.e., percentage of genetically modified soybeans in the sample. Semiquantitative results showed that a given sample which contained <2% genetically modified soybeans was identified as below 2% with a 99% confidence level. Quantitative use of the assay resulted in a repeatability (r) and reproducibility (R) that were computed to be RSDr = 7% and RSDR = 10%, respectively, for a sample containing 2% genetically modified soybeans. Application of this method depends on availability of appropriate reference materials for a specific food matrix. Only matrix-matched reference materials can be used for analysis of food or food fractions.     

Interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of the Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol in wheat and zearalenone in maize using different methods

Seventeen laboratories from six different countries, using their usual in-house methods, participated in an interlaboratory comparison test for the determination of the Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat and zearalenone (ZON) in maize. The toxins generally were extracted from maize and wheat employing mixtures of water, acidified water with an organic solvent or even pure water (for DON). While participants who used enzyme linked immuno sorbent assays (ELISA) for the determination of DON did not perform any clean-up, various techniques were applied for the purification of raw extracts (e.g. liquid/liquid extraction, solid phase extraction (SPE), immuno affinity chromatography (IAC)). For the final separation/quantification step either high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (mostly for ZON), gas chromatography (GC) (for DON) or ELISA were employed by participants. The aim of this study was to obtain information about the state of the art of mycotoxin analysis in cereals and to support a knowledge and experience exchange between the participating laboratories in the field of mycotoxin analysis. For each mycotoxin 5 different sample types were distributed, standard solutions (10.10 μg/ml ZON in methanol, 10.09 μg/ml DON in ethyl acetate), blank materials, spiked samples (75.1 μg/kg and 378.3 μg/kg ZON in maize, 126.2 μg/kg and 2519 μg/kg DON in wheat) and naturally contaminated maize and wheat. Coefficients of variation (CV) between laboratory mean results (outliers excluded) ranged from 6.2 to 27.7% for ZON and from 18.9 to 30.0% for DON. Except for the maize samples spiked at 75.1 μg/kg ZON the overall means (outliers rejected) statistically could not be distinguished from the respective target values. Average recoveries of the reported results ranged from 87.7 to 96.2% for ZON and from 94.2 to 108.5% for DON.     

Development of a reference material for routine performance monitoring of methods measuring polychorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls

Matrix-matched environmental certified reference materials (CRMs) are one of the most useful tools to validate analytical methods, assess analytical laboratory performance and to assist in the resolution of data conflicts between laboratories. This paper describes the development of a lake sediment as a CRM for polychorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DLPCBs). The presence of DLPCBs in the environment is of increased concern and analytical methods are being developed internationally for monitoring DLPCBs in the environment. This paper also reports the results of an international interlaboratory study involving thirty-five laboratories from seventeen countries, conducted to characterize and validate levels of a sediment reference material for PCDDs, PCDFs and DLPCBs.     

Method validation by interlaboratory studies of improved hydrophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity methods for the determination of antioxidant capacities of antioxidant solutions and food extracts

Hydrophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (H-ORAC) is a method for evaluating antioxidant capacities of solutions of hydrophilic compounds. In this study, we improved the original method for H-ORAC determination, and evaluated the precision of the two improved methods (methods A and B) by interlaboratory studies using 5 antioxidant solutions and 5 food extracts as test samples. An interlaboratory study of method A, in accordance with the harmonized protocol, demonstrated satisfactory performance (intermediate precision relative standard deviations (RSD(int)) ranging from 4.6 to 18.8%; the reproducibility relative standard deviations (RSD(R)) ranging from 7.0 to 21.1%, and the HorRat values ranging from 0.40 to 1.93). However, methodological problems remained, and a further improved method, method B, was thus developed. An interlaboratory study of method B by 5 participating laboratories showed better intermediate precision and reproducibility (RSD(int) and RSD(R) ranging from 1.8 to 9.4%, and from 4.4 to 13.8%, respectively), and all HorRat values for the test samples were less than 1.3, suggesting good performance for the H-ORAC measurement.     

Interlaboratory studies on wastewater toxicity using Daphnia magna

In order to verify the quality of biological measurements, the National Institute of Chemistry in Slovenia is regularly organizing interlaboratory comparisons to estimate the analytical precision of different laboratories using the same test and to determine if statistically significant differences exist between results. Several interlaboratory trials named “ILC-Waste Water” (ILC-WW) were organized in the last 7 years. Acute toxicity testing with Daphnia magna mobility inhibition assay (ISO 6341) was included in eight successive rounds and about 20 laboratories from Slovenia and a few adjacent countries took part in each study with two samples (T1 and T2) at two different concentration levels. Variation coefficients of the mean 24 h EC50s were determined for each exercise and the evaluation of the interlaboratory variability was analysed. Comparisons were also made of the results and the variability laboratories using organisms taken from laboratory cultures versus those who used daphnias hatched from dormant eggs (Daphtoxkits).     

Development of a reference material for routine performance monitoring of methods measuring polychorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls

Matrix–matched environmental certified reference materials (CRMs) are one of the most useful tools to validate analytical methods, assess analytical laboratory performance and to assist in the resolution of data conflicts between laboratories. This paper describes the development of a lake sediment as a CRM for polychorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DLPCBs). The presence of DLPCBs in the environment is of increased concern and analytical methods are being developed internationally for monitoring DLPCBs in the environment. This paper also reports the results of an international interlaboratory study involving thirty-five laboratories from seventeen countries, conducted to characterize and validate levels of a sediment reference material for PCDDs, PCDFs and DLPCBs.