Nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis method for the enantiomeric purity determination of S-timolol using heptakis(2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-sulfo)-beta-cyclodextrin: validation using the accuracy profile strategy and estimation of uncertainty

Nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE) was successfully applied to the enantiomeric purity determination of S-timolol maleate using heptakis(2,3-di-O-methyl-6-O-sulfo)-beta-cyclodextrin (HDMS-beta-CD) as chiral selector. With a background electrolyte made up of a methanolic solution of 0.75 M formic acid, 30 mM potassium camphorsulfonate and containing 30 mM HDMS-beta-CD, the determination of 0.1% of R-timolol in S-timolol could be performed with an enantiomeric resolution of 8.5. Pyridoxine was selected as internal standard. The NACE method was then fully validated by applying a novel strategy using accuracy profiles. It is based on beta-expectation tolerance intervals for the total measurement error which includes trueness and intermediate precision. The uncertainty of measurements derived from beta-expectation tolerance intervals was estimated at each concentration level of the validation standards. To confirm the suitability of the developed and validated method, several real samples of S-timolol maleate containing R-timolol maleate at different concentrations were analysed and the results were compared to those obtained by liquid chromatography.     

LC method for the determination of R-timolol in S-timolol maleate: Validation of its ability to quantify and uncertainty assessment

This article presents the validation results of a chiral liquid chromatographic (LC) method previously developed for the quantitative determination of R-timolol in S-timolol maleate samples. A novel validation strategy based on the accuracy profiles was used to select the most appropriate regression model, to assess the method accuracy within well defined acceptance limits and to determine the limits of quantitation as well as the concentration range.The validation phase was completed by the investigation of the risk profiles of various acceptable regression models in order to ensure the risk of obtaining the future measurements outside the acceptance limits fixed a priori.On the other hand, the present paper also shows how data used in this validation approach can be used to estimate the measurement uncertainty. The uncertainty derived from β-expectation tolerance interval (), which is equal to the uncertainty of measurements as well as the expanded uncertainty (U_x) using a coverage factor k = 2 was estimated. The uncertainty estimates obtained from validation data were finally compared with those obtained from interlaboratory and robustness studies.     

Ketopinic acid and diisoproylideneketogulonic acid as chiral ion-pair selectors in capillary electrophoresis. Enantiomeric impurity analysis of S-timolol and 1R,2S-ephedrine

1S,4R-(+)-ketopinic acid [(+)-KPA] has been introduced as a chiral selector for the separation of pharmacologically active amines by non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE). (+)-KPA gave enantioresolution for most of the compounds previously separated by 2R,3S,4R,5S-(-)-2,3:4,6-di-O-isopropylidene-2-keto-L-gulonic acid [(-)-DIKGA], but with a reversed migration order. A complete enantioresolution (Rs=4.2) was obtained for timolol, a compound that could not be resolved using (-)-DIKGA as the selector. Thus, (+)-KPA was evaluated for the enantiomeric purity determination of S-timolol. A method based on pre-concentration by transient isotachophoresis (tITP) provided a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.2% R-timolol in S-timolol samples. Because of the lack of enantioresolution of ephedrine when (+)-KPA was used as the selector, a method with (-)-DIKGA has been developed and validated for determination of the enantiomeric purity of the 1R,2S enantiomer. The method gave good precision and accuracy with an LOD (S/N=3) of 0.033% for the enantiomeric impurity 1S,2R-ephedrine.     

Uncertainty assessment from robustness testing applied on an LC assay for R-timolol and other related substances in S-timolol maleate

The robustness testing of a normal-phase liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the determination of R-timolol and other related substances in S-timolol maleate was performed applying a two-level Plackett-Burman design. Two qualitative and five quantitative factors were examined. Two types of responses were considered, qualitative, i.e. chromatographic performance criteria, and quantitative ones. The latter were taken into account to determine if the analytical procedure was robust. The quantitative responses were the contents of R-timolol in two S-timolol maleate samples. Even though some significant factor effects were observed on the qualitative responses, the R-timolol contents were not significantly different from those observed at nominal conditions, which demonstrated the robustness of the procedure.Since the experiments of the Plackett-Burman design can be assimilated to laboratories in an interlaboratory study, uncertainty can be evaluated using the robustness test data. The robustness test was set-up in such a way that the required variances could be estimated. It was shown that the robustness set-up allows estimating the reproducibility uncertainty without performing an interlaboratory study.     

光学活性噻吗洛尔的合成

噻呜洛尔(Timolol)是一种新型的β-受体阻断剂。化学名为S-(-)-1-叔丁胺基-3-[(4-吗啉代-1,2,5-噻二唑-3-基)氧]-2-丙醇顺丁烯二酸盐。     

Determination of ephedrine alkaloids in dietary supplements and botanicals by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry: collaborative study

An interlaboratory study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a method for ephedrine-type alkaloids [i.e., norephedrine (NE), norpseudoephedrine (NPE), ephedrine (E), pseudoephedrine (PE), methylephedrine (ME), and methylpseudoephedrine (MPE)] in dietary supplements and botanicals. The amount of ephedrine-type alkaloids present was determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass selective detection. The samples were diluted to reflect a concentration of 0.0200 to 1.00 microg/mL for each alkaloid. An internal standard was added and the alkaloids were separated using a 5 microm phenyl LC column with an ammonium acetate, glacial acetic acid, acetonitrile, and water mobile phase. Eight blind duplicates of dietary supplements or botanicals were analyzed by 10 collaborators. Included was a negative control, ephedra nevadensis, and negative controls fortified at 2 different levels with each of the 6 ephedrine-type alkaloids. The spike levels were approximately 100 and 1000 microg/g for NE, 100 and 600 microg/g for NPE, 6500 and 65000 microg/g for E, 1000 and 10 000 microg/g for PE, 300 and 3000 microg/g for ME, and 100 and 1000 microg/g for MPE. On the basis of the accuracy and precision results for this interlaboratory study, it is recommended that this method be adopted Official First Action for the determination of 6 different individual ephedrine-type alkaloids in dietary supplements and botanicals.     

Measurement uncertainty of food carotenoid determination

For consistent interpretation of an analytical method result it is necessary to evaluate the confidence that can be placed in it, in the form of a measurement uncertainty estimate. The Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement issued by ISO establishes rules for evaluating and expressing uncertainty. Carotenoid determination in food is a complex analytical process involving several mass transfer steps (extraction, evaporation, saponification, etc.), making difficult the application of these guidelines. The ISO guide was interpreted for analytical chemistry by EURACHEM, which includes the possibility of using intra- and interlaboratory information. Measurement uncertainty was estimated based on laboratory validation data, including precision and method performance studies, and also, based on laboratory participation in proficiency tests. These methods of uncertainty estimation were applied to analytical results of different food matrices of fruits and vegetables. Measurement uncertainty of food carotenoid determination was 10–30% of the composition value in the great majority of cases. Higher values were found for measurements near instrumental quantification limits (e.g. 75% for β-cryptoxanthin, and 99% for lutein, in pear) or when sample chromatograms presented interferences with the analyte peak (e.g. 44% for α-carotene in orange). Lower relative expanded measurement uncertainty values (3–13%) were obtained for food matrices/analytes not requiring the saponification step. Based on these results, the saponification step should be avoided if food carotenoids are not present in the ester form. Food carotenoid content should be expressed taking into account the measurement uncertainty; therefore the maximum number of significant figures of a result should be 2.     

Determination of total dietary fiber in selected foods containing resistant maltodextrin by a simplified enzymatic-gravimetric method and liquid chromatography: interlaboratory study in China

An interlaboratory study was conducted in China to validate the modified AOAC Official Method 2001.03 for the determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) in foods containing resistant maltodextrin (RMD), which will be adopted as the National Standard Method of China. The kind of buffer solution, the volume of filtrate evaporation, the volume of eluent for desalting and residual solution after evaporation, etc. were modified, which had been proved to have acceptable accuracy and precision in the routine assay. TDF contents in 3 representative foods and 2 kinds of RMD ingredient (i.e., NUTRIOSE 06 and NUTRIOSE 10) were measured using the modified method in 6 eligible laboratories representing commercial, industrial, and governmental laboratories in China. The results of the interlaboratory study indicated that the intralaboratory repeatability, interlaboratory reproducibility, and precision of the modified method are adequate for reliable analysis of TDF in food containing RMD, as well as resistant dextrin. Compared to AOAC Official Method 2001.03, the modified method is time- and cost-saving.     

Interlaboratory study of a liquid chromatography method for erythromycin: determination of uncertainty

Erythromycin is a mixture of macrolide antibiotics produced by Saccharopolyspora erythreas during fermentation. A new method for the analysis of erythromycin by liquid chromatography has previously been developed. It makes use of an Astec C18 polymeric column. After validation in one laboratory, the method was now validated in an interlaboratory study. Validation studies are commonly used to test the fitness of the analytical method prior to its use for routine quality testing. The data derived in the interlaboratory study can be used to make an uncertainty statement as well. The relationship between validation and uncertainty statement is not clear for many analysts and there is a need to show how the existing data, derived during validation, can be used in practice. Eight laboratories participated in this interlaboratory study. The set-up allowed the determination of the repeatability variance, s(2)r and the between-laboratory variance, s(2)L. Combination of s(2)r and s(2)L results in the reproducibility variance s(2)R. It has been shown how these data can be used in future by a single laboratory that wants to make an uncertainty statement concerning the same analysis.     

EQRAIN: uranium and plutonium interlaboratory exercises from 1997 to 2016—comparison to ITVs-2010

Since 1987, the CEA’s Committee for the establishment of analysis methods (CETAMA) has regularly implemented interlaboratory comparisons, entitled “evaluation of the quality results of analysis in the nuclear industry” (EQRAIN). Notably, the EQRAIN U and EQRAIN Pu interlaboratory comparisons assess proficiency in measuring a mass content of uranium or plutonium in reference solutions. This paper presents the results of measurement uncertainty assessments from EQRAIN U and EQRAIN Pu comparisons over 20 years of exercises (1997–2016). The mathematical approach developed in this work allowed to estimate the impact of short-term systematic and random errors to the overall uncertainty of each analytical method used in the interlaboratory comparison program. This statistical analysis shows a good consistency between measurement uncertainty values from EQRAINs and the measurement uncertainty target values established by the International Atomic Energy Agency for nuclear material balances (ITVs-2010).

     

Comparison of the uncertainties calculated for the results of radiochemical determinations using the law of propagation of uncertainty and a Monte Carlo simulation

Quantitative determinations of many radioactive analytes in environmental samples are based on a process in which several independent measurements of different properties are taken. The final results that are calculated using the data have to be evaluated for accuracy and precision. The estimate of the standard deviation, s, also called the combined standard uncertainty (CSU) associated with the result of this combined measurement can be used to evaluate the precision of the result. The CSU can be calculated by applying the law of propagation of uncertainty, which is based on the Taylor series expansion of the equation used to calculate the analytical result. The estimate of s can also be obtained from a Monte Carlo simulation. The data used in this simulation includes the values resulting from the individual measurements, the estimate of the variance of each value, including the type of distribution, and the equation used to calculate the analytical result. A comparison is made between these two methods of estimating the uncertainty of the calculated result.     

An expert system for designing an intelligent spreadsheet for evaluation of precision of liquid chromatographic methods

Method validation is increasing in importance as higher standards of precision and accuracy are required. The validation of liquid chromatographic methods requires the examination of selectivity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision and limitations, depending on the purpose of the method. The precision is affected by the repeatability of procedural steps (e.g., injection), within the method and by its overall reproducibility (e.g., interlaboratory reproducibility). The application of spreadsheets with an expert system to evaluate these effects is described. The spreadsheets are programmed to produce the necessary statistics. Rules are defined for the expert system to interact with these to select suitable tests for different applications, to set up spreadsheets into which the analyst inputs the data, and to interpret the data processed in the spreadsheet. The system is tested with a repeatability study of the separation of aspirin and salicylic acid. A combination of the Goldworks software for development of expert systems and the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet package was used.     

Variances and uncertainties of the sample laboratory-to-laboratory variance (S(L)2) and standard deviation (S(L)) associated with an interlaboratory study

The validation process for an analytical method usually employs an interlaboratory study conducted as a balanced completely randomized model involving a specified number of randomly chosen laboratories, each analyzing a specified number of randomly allocated replicates. For such studies, formulas to obtain approximate unbiased estimates of the variance and uncertainty of the sample laboratory-to-laboratory (lab-to-lab) STD (S(L)) have been developed primarily to account for the uncertainty of S(L) when there is a need to develop an uncertainty budget that includes the uncertainty of S(L). For the sake of completeness on this topic, formulas to estimate the variance and uncertainty of the sample lab-to-lab variance (S(L)2) were also developed. In some cases, it was necessary to derive the formulas based on an approximate distribution for S(L)2.     

Determination of measurement uncertainty for the determination of triazines in groundwater from validation data

Laboratories are increasingly urged to submit full uncertainties of their analytical results rather than only standard deviations. The determination of measurement uncertainties in compliance with the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) is demonstrated using the validation approach explicitly endorsed by the recent edition of the EURACHEM guide for the determination of measurement uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty was split into uncertainty of the sample mass, uncertainty of the concentration of the stock standard solution, uncertainty of the calibration and uncertainty connected to within- and between-series precision. Uncertainties of sample mass and of the concentration of the stock standard solution were 0.26 and 1.14% for all analytes, which is negligible compared with the contributions of precision and calibration. Uncertainty of calibration was estimated from the calibration graph. Relative uncertainty of calibration was found to be strongly concentration dependent and to be the main uncertainty contribution below 0.2 microgram L-1. Precision was split into within-series and between-series standard deviation, which dominate the combined standard uncertainty at higher concentrations. The results obtained from these calculations are compared with results for a certified reference material and with the performance in an interlaboratory comparison. It was found that all results agreed within their uncertainty with the target values, showing that the estimated uncertainties are realistic.     

Recent comparability of oceanographic nutrients data: results of a 2003 intercomparison exercise using reference materials.

An intercomparison exercise was conducted using the recently developed Reference Material for Nutrients in Seawater (RMNS). Discrepancies of reported values among laboratories were greater than the homogeneity of RMNS samples and the reported analytical precision of nutrients. The variability of in-house standards of the participating laboratories might be the most likely source of interlaboratory discrepancies. Therefore, the use of common reference materials, i.e. certified RM, is essential to establish and improve the comparability of nutrient data of the world's oceans.     

Determination of inorganic arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) in water samples by ion chromatography/inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

A method was validated for the direct determination of As(III) and As(V) in water samples by ion chromatography/inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Sample preservation required only dilution with a mobile phase containing a sufficient amount of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and acetic acid. Analyses of 6 certified reference materials (CRMs) of various water matrixes, including seawater, demonstrated good method accuracy. The matrixes included 2 natural water samples [National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Material (NIST SRM) 1643e and NIST SRM 1640], 1 fortified standard solution (TMDA-64), 1 fortified water sample (TM-DWS), and 2 seawater samples (CASS-4 and NASS-5). The sum of As(III) and As(V) in each CRM agreed with the respective certified value for the total amount of As within its stated uncertainty. Quantitative recoveries (96.7-102.1%) were obtained. Satisfactory results were achieved for intraday repeatability [relative standard deviation (RSD = 0.3-5.1%] and interday precision (RSD = 0.7-4.1%). In the study of fortified blanks and fortified CRMs, quantitative recoveries of As(III) and As(V) (92.5-102.6%) were obtained. Interconversion of As(III) and As(V) was not observed under the conditions of sample preservation. International comparability of analytical results was demonstrated by the analysis of 2 interlaboratory proficiency test samples, NY7011 and NY8511, from the New York State Department of Health.     

3M Petrifilm enterobacteriaceae count plate method for enumeration of enterobacteriaceae in selected foods: collaborative study

The practice of detecting and enumerating all oxidase-negative, glucose-fermenting-Gram-negative rods (i.e., the family Enterobacteriaceae) is used to indicate unsanitary or inadequate food processing conditions. The objective of this interlaboratory collaborative study was to evaluate and compare the methods described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products (SMEDP) and the Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods (Compendium) with a commercial product, the 3M Petrifilm Enterobacteriaceae Count Plate, for the recovery of Enterobacteriaceae in foods. Six foods--cheddar cheese, milk, flour, frozen prepared meals, frozen broccoli, and nut pieces--were analyzed for Enterobacteriaceae by 12 collaborating laboratories. For each food tested, the collaborators received 8 blind test portions consisting of a control test portion and 3 levels of inoculated test portion, each in duplicate. Each test portion was tested by the Petrifilm Enterobacteriaceae Count Plate method as well as the SMEDP or Compendium methods. The precision estimates (repeatability or within-laboratory variation, and reproducibility or between-laboratory variation) were calculated with standard statistical techniques.     

Interlaboratory comparison for quantitative primary metabolite profiling in Pichia pastoris

For the first time, an interlaboratory comparison was performed in the field of quantitative metabolite profiling in Pichia pastoris. The study was designed for the evaluation of different measurement platforms integrating different quantification strategies using internal standardization. Nineteen primary metabolites including amino acids and organic acids were selected for the study. Homogenous samples were obtained from chemostat fermentations after rapid sampling, quenching and filtration, and hot ethanol extraction. Laboratory 1 (BOKU) employed an in vivo-synthesized fully labeled U¹³C cell extracts of P. pastoris for immediate internal standardization upon cell extraction. Quantification was carried out using orthogonal reversed-phase (RP-LC) and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) in combination with tandem mass spectrometry. Laboratory 2 (Biocrates) applied a metabolomics kit allowing fully automated, rapid derivatization, solid phase extraction and internal standardization in 96-well plates with immobilized isotopically enriched internal standards in combination with HILIC-MS-MS and RP-LC-MS-MS for organic acids and derivatized amino acids, respectively. In this study, the obtained intracellular concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 108 μmol?g^?1 cell dry weight. The total combined uncertainty was estimated including uncertainty contributions from the corresponding MS-based measurement and sample preparation for each metabolite. Evidently, the uncertainty contribution of sample preparation was lower for the values obtained by laboratory 1, implementing isotope dilution upon extraction. Total combined uncertainties (K?=?2) ranging from 21 to 48 % and from 30 to 57 % were assessed for the quantitative results obtained in laboratories 1 and 2, respectively. The major contribution arose from sample preparation, hence from repeatability precision of the extraction procedure. Finally, the laboratory intercomparison was successful as most of the investigated metabolites showed concentration levels agreeing within their total combined uncertainty, implying that accurate quantification was given. The application of isotope dilution upon extraction was an absolute prerequisite for the quantification of the redox-sensitive amino acid methionine, where no agreement between the two laboratories could be achieved.     

Quantitation of 35S promoter in maize DNA extracts from genetically modified organisms using real-time polymerase chain reaction, part 2: interlaboratory study

The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and the European Network of GMO Working Laboratories have proposed development of a modular strategy for stepwise validation of complex analytical techniques. When applied to the quantitation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food products, the instrumental quantitation step of the technique is separately validated from the DNA extraction step to better control the sources of uncertainty and facilitate the validation of GMO-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory study on the quantitation step of the method standardized by CEN for the detection of a regulatory element commonly inserted in GMO maize-based foods. This is focused on the quantitation of P35S promoter through using the quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR). Fifteen French laboratories participated in the interlaboratory study of the P35S quantitation operating procedure on DNA extract samples using either the thermal cycler ABI Prism 7700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) or Light Cycler (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Attention was focused on DNA extract samples used to calibrate the method and unknown extract samples. Data were processed according to the recommendations of ISO 5725 standard. Performance criteria, obtained using the robust algorithm, were compared to the classic data processing after rejection of outliers by the Cochran and Grubbs tests. Two laboratories were detected as outliers by the Grubbs test. The robust precision criteria gave values between the classical values estimated before and after rejection of the outliers. Using the robust method, the relative expanded uncertainty by the quantitation method is about 20% for a 1% Bt176 content, whereas it can reach 40% for a 0.1% Bt176. The performances of the quantitation assay are relevant to the application of the European regulation, which has an accepted tolerance interval of about +/-50%. These data were fitted to a power model (r2 = 0.96). Thanks to this model, it is possible to propose an estimation of uncertainty of the QRT-PCR quantitation step and an uncertainty budget depending on the analytical conditions.     

Model proficiency testing scheme for serological diagnosis of Brucellosis: interlaboratory study

A model interlaboratory testing scheme was developed by the Italian National Reference Laboratory for Brucellosis. This scheme was planned for both qualitative (Rose Bengal Plate Test; RBPT) and quantitative (Complement Fixation Test; CFT) serological tests and involved a total of 42 laboratories. In the preparation of this scheme, reference was made to general protocols and guidelines and to methods reported in the literature, which were applicable to analytical chemistry laboratories. Six field sera from naturally infected animals, one positive serum at a titer below the European Union (EU) positivity threshold, and 5 sera positive at titers between 20 and 851 International Units of Complement Fixation Test (IUCFT)/mL plus one negative serum were used to produce a panel of test sera. To evaluate laboratory performances in the quantitative test for each tested sample examined, z-scores based on robust summary statistics (the median and normalized interquartile range) were used. To evaluate overall laboratory performance, 2 types of combined z-scores were used: Rescaled Sum of Scores and Sum of Squared Scores. In the case of the qualitative test (RBPT), results were analyzed by a Bayesian approach. A Beta distribution, based on the result of each laboratory, was calculated and used to estimate the probability of each laboratory giving a correct result and its uncertainty.