Families of sets with locally bounded width

A family of sets ? islocally k- wide if and only if the width (as a poset ordered by inclusion) of ? is at mostk for everyx. The directed covering graph of a locally 1-wide family of sets is a forest of rooted trees. It is shown that if ? is a locallyk-wide family of subsets of {1,...,n}, then |?|≤(2k) ^k?1 n. The proof involves a counting argument based on families of closed sets associated with theSperner closures in the filters of ?. The Sperner closure ofU in ? is the intersection of the members of the greatest Sperner antichain of ? _U = {V ∈ ?|V ?U}. This closure operation is related to a generalization of maximality in posets.     

Sparse connectivity certificates via MA orderings in graphs

For an undirected multigraph G=(V,E), let α be a positive integer weight function on V. For a positive integer k, G is called (k,α)-connected if any two vertices u,v∈V remain connected after removal of any pair (Z,E^′) of a vertex subset Z⊆V-{u,v} and an edge subset E^′⊆E such that ∑_v∈Zα(v)+|E^′|<k. The (k,α)-connectivity is an extension of several common generalizations of edge-connectivity and vertex-connectivity. Given a (k,α)-connected graph G, we show that a (k,α)-connected spanning subgraph of G with O(k|V|) edges can be found in linear time by using MA orderings. We also show that properties on removal cycles and preservation of minimum cuts can be extended in the (k,α)-connectivity.     

The number of connected sparsely edged graphs. II. Smooth graphs and blocks

A smooth graph is a connected graph without endpoints; f(n, q) is the number of connected graphs, v(n, q) is the number of smooth graphs, and u(n, q) is the number of blocks on n labeled points and q edges: W_k, V_k, and U_k are the exponential generating functions of f(n, n + k), v(n, n + k), and u(n, n + k), respectively. For any k ? 1, our reduction method shows that V_k can be deduced at once from W_k, which was found for successive k by the computer method described in our previous paper. Again the reduction method shows that U_k must be a sum of powers (mostly negative) of 1 - X and, given this information, we develop a recurrence method well suited to calculate U_k for successive k. Exact formulas for v(n, n + k) and u(n, n + k) for general n follow at once.     

On distance two graphs of upper bound graphs

For a poset P=(X,≤), the upper bound graph (UB-graph) of P is the graph U=(X,E_U), where uv∈E_U if and only if u≠v and there exists m∈X such that u,v≤m. For a graph G, the distance two graph DS₂(G) is the graph with vertex set V(DS₂(G))=V(G) and u,v∈V(DS₂(G)) are adjacent if and only if d_G(u,v)=2. In this paper, we deal with distance two graphs of upper bound graphs. We obtain a characterization of distance two graphs of split upper bound graphs.     

Graph parameters measuring neighbourhoods in graphs—Bounds and applications

The neighbourhood-width of a graph G=(V,E) is introduced in [F. Gurski, Linear layouts measuring neighbourhoods in graphs, Discrete Math. 306 (15) (2006) 1637-1650.] as the smallest integer k such that there is a linear layout ?:V→{1,…,|V|} such that for every 1?i<|V| the vertices u with ?(u)?i can be divided into at most k subsets each members having the same neighbours with respect to the vertices v with ?(v)>i.In this paper we show first bounds for the neighbourhood-width of general graphs, caterpillars, trees and grid graphs and give applications of the layout parameter neighbourhood-width in graph drawing and VLSI design.     

Linear layouts measuring neighbourhoods in graphs

In this paper we introduce the graph layout parameter neighbourhood-width as a variation of the well-known cut-width. The cut-width of a graph G=(V,E) is the smallest integer k, such that there is a linear layout ?:V→{1,…,|V|}, such that for every 1?i<|V| there are at most k edges {u,v} with ?(u)?i and ?(v)>i. The neighbourhood-width of a graph is the smallest integer k, such that there is a linear layout ?, such that for every 1?i<|V| the vertices u with ?(u)?i can be divided into at most k subsets each members having the same neighbourhood with respect to the vertices v with ?(v)>i.We show that the neighbourhood-width of a graph differs from its linear clique-width or linear NLC-width at most by one. This relation is used to show that the minimization problem for neighbourhood-width is NP-complete.Furthermore, we prove that simple modifications of neighbourhood-width imply equivalent layout characterizations for linear clique-width and linear NLC-width.We also show that every graph of path-width k or cut-width k has neighbourhood-width at most k+2 and we give several conditions such that graphs of bounded neighbourhood-width have bounded path-width or bounded cut-width.     

Functional convergence of stochastic integrals with application to statistical inference

Assuming that {(U_n,V_n)} is a sequence of càdlàg processes converging in distribution to (U,V) in the Skorohod topology, conditions are given under which {?f_n(β,u,v)dU_ndV_n} converges weakly to ?f(β,x,y)dUdV in the space C(R), where f_n(β,u,v) is a sequence of “smooth” functions converging to f(β,u,v). Integrals of this form arise as the objective function for inference about a parameter β in a stochastic model. Convergence of these integrals play a key role in describing the asymptotics of the estimator of β which optimizes the objective function. We illustrate this with a moving average process.     

Centers to centroids in graphs

For S ? V(G) the S-center and S-centroid of G are defined as the collection of vertices u ∈ V(G) that minimize e_s(u) = max {d(u, v): v ∈ S} and d_s(u) = ∑_u∈S d(u, v), respectively. This generalizes the standard definition of center and centroid from the special case of S = V(G). For 1 ? k ?|V(G)| and u ∈ V(G) let r_k(u) = max {∑_s∈S d(u, s): S ? V(G), |S| = k}. The k-centrum of G, denoted C(G; k), is defined to be the subset of vertices u in G for which r_k(u) is a minimum. This also generalizes the standard definitions of center and centroid since C(G; 1) is the center and C(G; |V(G)|) is the centroid. In this paper the structure of these sets for trees is examined. Generalizations of theorems of Jordan and Zelinka are included.     

On the average genus of the random graph

The generalized Petersen graph GP (n, k), n ≤ 3, 1 ≥ k < n/2 is a cubic graph with vertex-set {u_j; i ? Z_n} ∪ {v_j; i ? Z_n}, and edge-set {u_iu_i, u_iv_i, v_iv_{i+k, i?}Z_n}. In the paper we prove that (i) GP(n, k) is a Cayley graph if and only if k² ? 1 (mod n); and (ii) GP(n, k) is a vertex-transitive graph that is not a Cayley graph if and only if k² ? -1 (mod n) or (n, k) = (10, 2), the exceptional graph being isomorphic to the 1-skeleton of the dodecahedon. The proof of (i) is based on the classification of orientable regular embeddings of the n-dipole, the graph consisting of two vertices and n parallel edges, while (ii) follows immediately from (i) and a result of R. Frucht, J.E. Graver, and M.E. Watkins [“The Groups of the Generalized Petersen Graphs,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 70 (1971), pp. 211-218]. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Cyclic quartic fields and genus theory of their subfields

Let k = $\text{Q}$(√u) (u ≠ 1 squarefree), K any possible cyclic quartic field containing k. A close relation is established between K and the genus group of k. In particular: (1) Each K can be written uniquely as K = $\text{Q}$(√vwη), where η is fixed in k and satisfies η ? 1, (η) = $\text{U}$²√u, |$\text{U}$²| = |(√u)|, (v, u) = 1, v ∈ $\text{Z}$ is squarefree, w|u, 0 < w < √u. Thus if u ≠ a² + b², there is no K ? k. If u = a² + b² then for each fixed v there are 2^{g ? 1}K ? k, where g is the number of prime divisors of u. (2) $\text{K}\text{k}$ has a relative integral basis (RIB) (i.e., O_K is free over O_k) iff N(ε₀) = ?1 and w = 1, where ε₀ is the fundamental unit of k, (or, equivalently, iff K = $\text{Q}$(√vε₀√u), (v, u) = 1). (3) A RIB is constructed explicitly whenever it exists. (4) disc(K) is given. In particular, the following results are special cases of (2): (i) Narkiewicz showed in 1974 that $\text{K}\text{k}$ has a RIB if u is a prime; (ii) Edgar and Peterson (J. Number Theory12 (1980), 77–83) showed that for u composite there is at least one K ? k having no RIB. Besides, it follows from (4) that the classification and integral basis of K given by Albert (Ann. of Math.31 (1930), 381–418) are wrong.     

Social choice for bliss-point problems

This paper's concern is the axiomatic determination of social choice correspondences Ψ for a class of n-person problems that are characterized by some — generally — non-feasible bliss-point u(V)(?V∈τ . Meeting appropriate assumptions of ‘planner's rationality’ it is shown that Ψ is necessarily norm-induced, i.e. one can find some norm |·| in Rⁿ s.t. Ψ(V) = {u?V|6u-u(V)6=min{6v-u(V)6|v,V}}. The mathematical problem of recovering. from Ψ is one of integration which has its well-known parallel in the theory of revealed preference.     

Geodesic-pancyclic graphs

A shortest path connecting two vertices u and v is called a u-v geodesic. The distance between u and v in a graph G, denoted by d_G(u,v), is the number of edges in a u-v geodesic. A graph G with n vertices is panconnected if, for each pair of vertices u,v∈V(G) and for each integer k with d_G(u,v)?k?n-1, there is a path of length k in G that connects u and v. A graph G with n vertices is geodesic-pancyclic if, for each pair of vertices u,v∈V(G), every u-v geodesic lies on every cycle of length k satisfying max{2d_G(u,v),3}?k?n. In this paper, we study sufficient conditions of geodesic-pancyclic graphs. In particular, we show that most of the known sufficient conditions of panconnected graphs can be applied to geodesic-pancyclic graphs.     

Variations of Y-dominating functions on graphs

Let Y be a subset of real numbers. A Y-dominating function of a graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→Y such that for all vertices v∈V, where N_G[v]={v}∪{u|(u,v)∈E}. Let for any subset S of V and let f(V) be the weight of f. The Y-domination problem is to find a Y-dominating function of minimum weight for a graph G=(V,E). In this paper, we study the variations of Y-domination such as {k}-domination, k-tuple domination, signed domination, and minus domination for some classes of graphs. We give formulas to compute the {k}-domination, k-tuple domination, signed domination, and minus domination numbers of paths, cycles, n-fans, n-wheels, n-pans, and n-suns. Besides, we present a unified approach to these four problems on strongly chordal graphs. Notice that trees, block graphs, interval graphs, and directed path graphs are subclasses of strongly chordal graphs. This paper also gives complexity results for the problems on doubly chordal graphs, dually chordal graphs, bipartite planar graphs, chordal bipartite graphs, and planar graphs.     

On the eccentric distance sum of trees and unicyclic graphs

Let G be a simple connected graph with the vertex set V(G). The eccentric distance sum of G is defined as ξd(G)=_∑v∈V(G)ε(v)DG(v), where ε(v) is the eccentricity of the vertex v and DG(v)=_∑u∈V(G)d(u,v) is the sum of all distances from the vertex v. In this paper we characterize the extremal unicyclic graphs among n-vertex unicyclic graphs with given girth having the minimal and second minimal eccentric distance sum. In addition, we characterize the extremal trees with given diameter and minimal eccentric distance sum.     

On Samelson products in p-localized unitary groups

The unitary group U(n) has elements εi∈π2i+1(U(n)) (0?i?n−1) of its homotopy groups in the stable range. In this paper we show that certain multi Samelson products of type 〈εi,〈εj,εk〉〉 are non-trivial. This leads us to the result that the nilpotency class of the group of the self homotopy set [SU(n),SU(n)] is no less than 3, if 4?n. Also by the power of generalized Samelson products, we can see the further result that, for a prime p and an integer n=pk, nil[SU(n),SU(n)]_(p)?3, if (1) p?7 or (2) p=5 and n≡0 or 1mod4.     

A note on Roman domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u∈V-S, there exists a vertex v∈S such that uv∈E. The domination number of G, γ(G), equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. A Roman dominating function on graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V)=∑_v∈Vf(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_R(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, for any integer k(2?k?γ(G)), we give a characterization of graphs for which γ_R(G)=γ(G)+k, which settles an open problem in [E.J. Cockayne, P.M. Dreyer Jr, S.M. Hedetniemi et al. On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22].     

Resolvability in circulant graphs

A set W of the vertices of a connected graph G is called a resolving set for G if for every two distinct vertices u, v ∈ V (G) there is a vertex w ∈ W such that d(u, w) ≠ d(v, w). A resolving set of minimum cardinality is called a metric basis for G and the number of vertices in a metric basis is called the metric dimension of G, denoted by dim(G). For a vertex u of G and a subset S of V (G), the distance between u and S is the number min s∈S d(u, s). A k-partition Π = {S 1 , S 2 , . . . , S k } of V (G) is called a resolving partition if for every two distinct vertices u, v ∈ V (G) there is a set S i in Π such that d(u, Si )≠ d(v, Si ). The minimum k for which there is a resolving k-partition of V (G) is called the partition dimension of G, denoted by pd(G). The circulant graph is a graph with vertex set Zn , an additive group of integers modulo n, and two vertices labeled i and j adjacent if and only if i-j (mod n) ∈ C , where CZn has the property that C =-C and 0 ■ C. The circulant graph is denoted by Xn, Δ where Δ = |C|. In this paper, we study the metric dimension of a family of circulant graphs Xn, 3 with connection set C = {1, n/2 , n-1} and prove that dim(Xn, 3 ) is independent of choice of n by showing that dim(Xn, 3 ) ={3 for all n ≡ 0 (mod 4), 4 for all n ≡ 2 (mod 4). We also study the partition dimension of a family of circulant graphs Xn,4 with connection set C = {±1, ±2} and prove that pd(Xn, 4 ) is independent of choice of n and show that pd(X5,4 ) = 5 and pd(Xn,4 ) ={3 for all odd n ≥ 9, 4 for all even n ≥ 6 and n = 7.     

Edge-disjoint spanners in tori

A spanning subgraph S=(V,E^′) of a connected graph G=(V,E) is an (x+c)-spanner if for any pair of vertices u and v, d_S(u,v)≤d_G(u,v)+c where d_G and d_S are the usual distance functions in G and S, respectively. The parameter c is called the delay of the spanner. We study edge-disjoint spanners in graphs in multi-dimensional tori. We show that each two-dimensional torus has a set of two edge-disjoint spanners of delay approximately the size of the smaller dimension. Moreover, we show that this delay is close to the best possible. In three-dimensional tori, we find a set of three edge-disjoint spanners with delay approximately the sum of the sizes of the two smaller dimensions when all dimensions are of even size. Surprisingly, we also find a set of two edge-disjoint spanners in three-dimensional tori of constant delay. In d-dimensional tori, we show that for any k≤d/5, there is a set of k edge-disjoint spanners with delay depending only on k and the size of the smaller k dimensions.     

Hall number for list colorings of graphs: Extremal results

Given a graph G=(V,E) and sets L(v) of allowed colors for each v∈V, a list coloring of G is an assignment of colors φ(v) to the vertices, such that φ(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V and φ(u)≠φ(v) for all uv∈E. The choice number of G is the smallest natural number k admitting a list coloring for G whenever |L(v)|≥k holds for every vertex v. This concept has an interesting variant, called Hall number, where an obvious necessary condition for colorability is put as a restriction on the lists L(v). (On complete graphs, this condition is equivalent to the well-known one in Hall’s Marriage Theorem.) We prove that vertex deletion or edge insertion in a graph of order n>3 may make the Hall number decrease by as much as n−3. This estimate is tight for all n. Tightness is deduced from the upper bound that every graph of order n has Hall number at most n−2. We also characterize the cases of equality; for n≥6 these are precisely the graphs whose complements are K₂∪(n−2)K₁, P₄∪(n−4)K₁, and C₅∪(n−5)K₁. Our results completely solve a problem raised by Hilton, Johnson and Wantland [A.J.W. Hilton, P.D. Johnson, Jr., E. B. Wantland, The Hall number of a simple graph, Congr. Numer. 121 (1996), 161-182, Problem 7] in terms of the number of vertices, and strongly improve some estimates due to Hilton and Johnson [A.J.W. Hilton, P.D. Johnson, Jr., The Hall number, the Hall index, and the total Hall number of a graph, Discrete Appl. Math. 94 (1999), 227-245] as a function of maximum degree.