Fit-for-purpose shellfish reference materials for internal and external quality control in the analysis of phycotoxins

The need for reference materials for quality control of analysis of foodstuffs has been stressed frequently. This has been particularly true in the phycotoxins field, where there is a great shortage of both pure calibration standards and reference materials. Worldwide there are very few independent bodies that produce certified reference materials for phycotoxins, the main producers currently being the National Research Council Canada and the Japanese Food Research Laboratory. Limited availability of contaminated shellfish and algae, as well as the time and knowledge necessary for the production of adequate reference materials, continuously lead to limited editions of certified reference materials and even more limited production of in-house reference materials. The restricted availability of in-house quality control materials promotes the rapid use of the limited certified reference materials, which in turn hampers the production of the suite of materials required globally for complete protection of public health. This paper outlines the various options that analysts can pursue in the use of reference materials for internal and external quality control, with a view to optimising the efforts of both reference materials users and reference materials producers. For this purpose, the logical sequence is reviewed from the discovery of a new bioactive compound in shellfish, through initial method development up to regulation for food safety purposes including accepted reference methods. Subsequently, the requirements for and efforts typically spent in the production and characterisation of laboratory reference materials, certified reference materials and other test materials used in inter-laboratory studies or proficiency testing, in the area of marine biotoxins are evaluated. Particular emphasis is put on practical advice for the preparation of in-house reference materials. The intricate link between reference material characterisation and method performance is outlined to give guidance on the appropriate in-house method validation in the rapidly developing field of phycotoxins.      

Accreditation of reference material producers: an Australian perspective

The National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia has operated an accreditation program for reference material producers since 1997 with accreditation now being offered to ISO Guide 34 (2000). This paper discusses the benefits and disadvantages to both the producers and the users of reference materials (testing laboratories) and their clients of a formal system of third-party accreditation of reference material producers. The merits of using ISO Guide 34 (2000) rather than ISO/IEC 17025 as the core standard in the accreditation process are discussed.     

Accreditation system for reference material producers and certified reference materials for iron and steel in Japan

  ISO 9000 series strictly requires traceability to national or international measurement standards. It is becoming more necessary to make clear the concept of traceability of measurement standards with respect to chemical composition and to accredit the reference material producers. In Japan, the accreditation system for reference material producers is considered to satisfy the requirement of ISO Guide 34, ISO 9000 series and ISO/IEC Guide 25, while the producer fulfills the concept of traceability of measurement standards. This paper describes the production of iron and steel reference materials in Japan relating to the international standardization of methods (written standards) and accreditation of reference material producers. Received: 11 October 1996 Accepted: 5 December 1996     

Accreditation of reference material producers: Let's get it right!

The accreditation of testing and calibration laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025 is increasingly calling for the accreditation of reference material (RM) producers. Two international guides, ISO Guide 34 (2000) " General requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the ISO Committee on Reference Materials and ILAC-G 12 " Guidelines for the requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), are already in use for this purpose. Recently however initiatives have been launched to accredit RM producers to ISO 17025 as calibration laboratories and it has been suggested that a combination of ISO/IEC 17025 " General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories" and ISO Guide 34 may be the best option. This publication is an expression of the position of the ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO/REMCO) on the standards and guides currently in use in the accreditation of RM producers. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these standards and guides from the perspective of benefit to RM producers and RM users. In conclusion, the use of ISO Guide 34 alone or in combination with ILAC-G 12 is the preferred system for the accreditation of RM producers. Therefore ISO/REMCO strongly encourages all accreditation bodies to adopt ISO Guide 34.     

Reference material requirements for laboratories and the role of accreditation bodies

It is now over two years since ISO/IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories was published. The standard places increased emphasis on the demonstration of traceability of measurements made by laboratories. In the areas of chemical and biological metrology, the introduction of this standard has brought new challenges for laboratories to grapple with. This paper will examine the requirements regarding traceability for chemical and biological measurements, with specific reference to the use of reference materials by laboratories. This will be explored from the perspective of both accreditation bodies and a laboratory which is both a user and producer of certified reference materials. Moreover, the paper will describe mechanisms that are being used to improve the use of reference materials by accredited laboratories and hence the traceability of measurements. Finally the role of accreditation programs for reference material producers in assisting with this aspect will be examined.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article if you access the article at . A link in the frame on the left on that page takes you directly to the supplementary material.Presented at BERM-9—Ninth International Symposium on Biological and Environmental Reference Materials, June 15–19, 2003 Berlin, Germany.     

The third edition of ISO Guide 34: what were the drivers for the revision and what is new?

After the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) had taken in 2004, the resolution to conduct accreditation of producers of reference materials according to ISO Guide 34 ‘General requirements for the competence of reference material producers’ in combination with ISO/IEC 17025 ‘General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories’, ISO/REMCO, the ISO Committee on Reference Materials, decided in 2005 to revise ISO Guide 34 to align it closer with ISO/IEC 17025 and to clarify certain issues for accreditors and producers seeking accreditation without adding new requirements. Moreover, the publication in 2007 of ISO/IEC Guide 99 ‘International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)’ triggered additional adaptations of the guide.     

Development and supply system of reference materials based on the Measurement Law in Japan

 Analytical instruments used for measurements of air and water pollution are calibrated by using reference materials such as standard gases and standard solutions. In Japan, since the middle of the 1970s, those reference materials which are traceable to the national standards maintained at national research institutes have been supplied to users by reference material producers. In order to establish the primary standards and to secure the traceability from the working standards to the national ones, various analytical methods such as coulometric, titrimetric and gravimetric analyses for purity determination and highly sensitive atomic spectrometry for trace analysis have been developed as the primary methods and reference methods. The Japanese Measurement Law, revised in 1992, has introduced a new traceability system in which a public organization, a "designated calibration body", can also prepare and maintain the national standards under the advice and instruction of national research institutes. The designated calibration body can provide calibration services to reference material producers (accredited calibration bodies) by using the national standards. The reference materials supplied in conformity with the traceability system include standard gases, pH standard solutions, metal standard solutions and non-metal ion standard solutions. Received: 4 October 1996 Accepted: 2 December 1996     

New ISO Guide 34 – How is the change affecting practice in the Czech Republic?

 The positive contribution of the ISO Guide 34 review is the idea of increasing responsibility of reference materials producers. The change of the main intention introduces some problems related to national legislation. There is a very important discussion going on about these problems among metrological bodies, accreditation institutes, reference material producers and laboratories.     

The role of reference materials

In this article the role of reference materials is confined to chemical measurements only. Recognized reference materials are one of the tools to obtain comparability of analytical results. Recognition demands confidence in the reference materials and in the reference material producers. A reference material producer is a technical competent body that is fully responsible for the certified or other property values of the reference material. The "analyte" has to be specified in relation to the selectivity of analytical procedure. The full range of reference materials can be presented as a three-dimensional space of the coordinates: analyte, matrix and application. If reference materials are used for calibration or correction of calibrations they establish the traceability of results of chemical measurements. The traceability is only valid within a stated range of uncertainty. Pure substances can represent the unit of amount of substance. A precondition is the microscale specification of the analyte and the accurate determination of the main component and/or the impurities.     

对新版ISO导则34的理解

标准物质在实现测量结果溯源性以及不同时空测量结果的可比性方面具有广泛的应用。面对标准物质需求的不断增长和标准物质生产者数量的不断增加,新版ISO导则34：2009《标准物质生产者能力的通用要求》于2009年发布,以在促进该领域研究发展的同时,确保各种不同来源标准物质的质量。针对新版ISO导则34所涉及的相关名词术语以及一些重要原则进行了讨论,以促进对该导则的理解和在我国的推广应用。     

The role of reference materials

 In this article the role of reference materials is confined to chemical measurements only. Recognized reference materials are one of the tools to obtain comparability of analytical results. Recognition demands confidence in the reference materials and in the reference material producers. A reference material producer is a technical competent body that is fully responsible for the certified or other property values of the reference material. The "analyte" has to be specified in relation to the selectivity of analytical procedure. The full range of reference materials can be presented as a three-dimensional space of the coordinates: analyte, matrix and application. If reference materials are used for calibration or correction of calibrations they establish the traceability of results of chemical measurements. The traceability is only valid within a stated range of uncertainty. Pure substances can represent the unit of amount of substance. A precondition is the microscale specification of the analyte and the accurate determination of the main component and/or the impurities.

     

The work of ISO-REMCO’s accreditation task group

This paper discusses some of the work of ISO-REMCO’s Task Group 4 (TG4) – the Accreditation TG, giving firstly a brief account of the recently published ISO Guide 34 – which gives guidance on the type of quality system a reference material producer should have in place. Secondly, work on the future development of Guide 34 to produce a document against which it will be possible for producers to be accredited without reference to ISO Guide 25 is discussed, and thirdly, the possible formation of an international register of CRM producers, which will provide users with information about the quality status of different producers, is considered.     

Recent developments in the field of environmental reference materials at the JRC Ispra

The production of reference materials for environmental analysis started in the Joint Research Centre at Ispra/Italy in 1972 with the objective of later certification by the BCR, but for obvious budget reasons only a fraction of the total production achieved at Ispra ever reached certification level, although all materials were produced according to the severe quality requirements requested for certified reference materials. Therefore, the materials not destinated to certification are in growing demand as inter-laboratory test materials and as laboratory reference materials, for internal quality control, e.g., by control charts. The history of reference material production within the Joint Research Centre is briefly reviewed and the latest additions described. New developments such as micro-scale reference materials intended for analytical methods requiring sample intakes at milligram or sub-milligram level and therefor not finding supply on the reference material market, and "wet" environmental reference materials, which meet more precisely the "real-world" environmental analysis conditions, are presented and the state-of-the-art discussed.     

Matrix reference materials – provision in Australia

 Until quite recently, Australia has not been much involved in the preparation and certification of matrix reference materials for chemical testing. Even today, the vast bulk of chemical reference materials used in Australia are imported from other world producers. Increased international focus on the accuracy, traceability and comparability of chemical measurements has led to the establishment of the National Analytical Reference Laboratory (NARL) within the Australian Government Analytical Laboratories. Part of the work of NARL will be to supply matrix reference materials, not available from existing sources, to meet specific Australian requirements. This need has been addressed in the past by a combination of industry and government initiatives. Examples include a series of certified matrix reference materials for chemical testing of iron ore, coal and mineral sands produced by Standards Australia and a series of three animal fat matrix reference materials certified for a range of pesticide residues produced by the Australian Chemical Standards Laboratory (now part of NARL). To make effective use of limited resources, it will be important for NARL to focus on identified priorities and to maximise the use of available Australian resources and expertise through technical collaboration for reference material production. An important part of this process should be input on needs and priorities from reference material "users" such as government legislators, regulatory authorities, standards setting bodies, industry and the analytical community. The aim will be to produce matrix certified reference materials that are traceable to SI or other international standards at a stated level of measurement uncertainty.     

The NATA scheme for accreditation of certifiers of reference materials

 Certified reference materials are widely used for the calibration of measuring equipment and for the evaluation or validation of measurement procedures. The use of reference materials makes possible the transfer of the values of measured or assigned quantities between testing, analytical and measurement laboratories, both nationally and internationally. There is an increasing number of reference materials producers in other countries, and a demonstration of their scientific and technical competence is now more widely considered to be a basic requirement for ensuring the quality of reference materials. This article outlines recent activities by international bodies and their culmination in a scheme of accreditation of certifiers of reference materials which has been developed by the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (NATA).     

The present situation of Japanese certified reference materials registered in the COMAR database

 In the field of reference materials, COMAR (Code d'Indexation des Matériaux de Référence) is now internationally known as a reliable directory. In order to improve the quality of COMAR, a document which covers general requirements for the registration of reference material has recently been adopted by the Japanese coding centre, NITE. This paper describes the general requirements for reference materials and the current status of the COMAR database coded by the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (NITE), Japan. The concept of the requirements is fundamentally based on the ISO Guides 30, 31, 33, 34 and 35. Certifications of reference materials are divided into the following three categories in the newly adopted document. 1. Certifications based on the results of interlaboratory comparisons 2. Certifications in accordance with the Measurement Law 3. Certifications in accordance with the measurement results of national institutions An example of an uncertainty evaluation is also presented in the paper. Received: 14 October 1996 Accepted: 3 December 1996     

The establishment of a quality evaluation system of reference materials

Reference materials have been applied widely to ensure the traceability, comparability and reliability of measurement results. To achieve this purpose, the quality of reference materials (RMs) themselves is surely an important aspect to be pay attention to. A quality evaluation system of RMs has been established through the project “The National Sharing Platform of Reference Materials” in China to give a reliable assessment on the quality of RMs from various sources including the accuracy and comparability of their property values, which is very useful to promote the appropriate selecting and using of RMs in China. Through the application of National Metrology Institute calibration and measurement capabilities on the basis of the international mutual recognition arrangement, it can also provide a powerful supplement to the current activities such as the accreditation of RM producers in the construction of a global harmonized quality control and assurance system of RMs.     

k0-NAA, a valuable tool for reference-material producers.

The main concern of producers of certified reference materials (CRM) is the preparation of high-quality products with demonstrated homogeneity and stability, combined with a well established set of certified characteristics. CRM producers must, furthermore, comply with other constraints imposed by the ISO Guide 34: production processes, production control, and certification analyses should be performed by expert laboratories, using validated protocols documented in their respective quality assurance manuals; laboratory mean values and the corresponding "expanded" uncertainties, must be used for the determination of the certified values, as recommended by the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainties in Measurements (GUM); and when possible, traceability of the certified value to the SI units, using appropriately validated and/or primary methods, must be ensured. k0-NAA, i.e. neutron activation analysis with k0 standardization, is one of the analytical techniques implemented at the Reference Material Unit of IRMM; it meets the first two requirements.     

The new ISO Guide 80: Guidance for the in-house preparation of quality control materials (QCMs)

Reference materials (RMs) are widely used in measurement laboratories for a variety of purposes, and it is important to recognise that the material most appropriate for a particular application should be used. Certified reference materials (CRMs) are used for method validation, the calibration of a measurement system and all other aspects of the evaluation of the measurement system where the trueness of the measurement result is required. For other aspects, such as quality control, precision studies, the checking of the variability between operators, where the results are compared relatively, any suitable reference material can be used. ISO/REMCO, the ISO Committee on Reference Materials, has prepared ISO Guide 80, a guidance document for the in-house preparation of quality control materials (QCMs). QCMs are mostly used to monitor the performance of laboratory methods that have already been validated over time to be able to detect change or when a method goes out of statistical control. QCMs are RMs and as such have to be sufficiently homogeneous and stable for the intended use. QCMs are usually prepared in-house by laboratory staff for in-house use only, and therefore, the requirements for “in-house” QCMs are less demanding than those for a CRM. For example, transport issues are not of concern. The quality assessment of QCMs should involve homogeneity and stability assessments, and a limited characterisation of the material to provide an indication of its relevant property values and their variation, prior to use.