Supramolecular architectures in two 1:1 cocrystals of 5‐fluorouracil with 5‐bromothiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid and thiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid

In solid‐state engineering, cocrystallization is a strategy actively pursued for pharmaceuticals. Two 1:1 cocrystals of 5‐fluorouracil (5FU; systematic name: 5‐fluoro‐1,3‐dihydropyrimidine‐2,4‐dione), namely 5‐fluorouracil–5‐bromothiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid (1/1), C₅H₃BrO₂S·C₄H₃FN₂O₂, (I), and 5‐fluorouracil–thiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid (1/1), C₄H₃FN₂O₂·C₅H₄O₂S, (II), have been synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. In both cocrystals, carboxylic acid molecules are linked through an acid–acid R ₂²(8) homosynthon (O—H…O) to form a carboxylic acid dimer and 5FU molecules are connected through two types of base pairs [homosynthon, R ₂²(8) motif] via a pair of N—H…O hydrogen bonds. The crystal structures are further stabilized by C—H…O interactions in (II) and C—Br…O interactions in (I). In both crystal structures, π–π stacking and C—F…π interactions are also observed.     

Three closely related dibenzazepine carboxylic acids: hydrogen‐bonded aggregation in one,two and three dimensions

In the structure of (6R*,11R*)‐5‐acetyl‐11‐ethyl‐6,11‐dihydro‐5H‐dibenzo[b,e]azepine‐6‐carboxylic acid, C₁₉H₁₉NO₃, (I), the molecules are linked into sheets by a combination of O—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds; in the structure of the monomethyl analogue (6RS,11SR)‐5‐acetyl‐11‐ethyl‐2‐methyl‐6,11‐dihydro‐5H‐dibenzo[b,e]azepine‐6‐carboxylic acid, C₂₀H₂₁NO₃, (II), the molecules are linked into simple C(7) chains by O—H...O hydrogen bonds; and in the structure of the dimethyl analogue (6RS,11SR)‐5‐acetyl‐11‐ethyl‐1,3‐dimethyl‐6,11‐dihydro‐5H‐dibenzo[b,e]azepine‐6‐carboxylic acid, C₂₁H₂₃NO₃, (III), a combination of O—H...O, C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds links the molecules into a three‐dimensional framework structure. None of these structures exhibits the R₂²(8) dimer motif characteristic of simple carboxylic acids.     

Polymeric bis(phosphonomethyl­carboxylato)calcium(II) at 85 K

In the crystal structure of the title compond, alternatively called poly[calcium(II)‐di‐μ‐carboxymethylphosphonato], [Ca(C₂H₄O₅P)₂]_n or [Ca(H₂AP)₂]_n, one of the phosphonate O atoms of the phosphonocarboxylate monoanion lies nearly antiperiplanar (ap) to the carboxylic acid C atom. The phosphonate P atom is located −sc and +ac relative to the carboxylic acid O atoms. The overall structure has a layered architecture. The Ca²⁺ cations lie on a twofold axis and are bridged by the phosphonate O atoms to form chains along the c axis, giving layers parallel to (100). There are medium‐strength O—H⃛O and C—H⃛O hydrogen‐bonding interactions stabilizing the layers, and O—H⃛O hydrogen bonds connect adjacent layers.     

2‐(Benzoylsulfanyl)acetic acid and 2,5‐dioxopyrrolidin‐1‐yl 2‐(benzoylsulfanyl)acetate by powder X‐ray diffraction studies

The structures of the title compounds, C₉H₈O₃S, (I), and C₁₃H₁₁NO₅S, (II), were determined by X‐ray powder diffraction. Both were solved using the direct‐space parallel tempering algorithm and refined using the Rietveld method. In (I), the C—S—C bond angle is slightly smaller than normal, indicating more p character in the bonding orbitals of the S atom. The carboxylic acid group joins across an inversion centre to form a dimer. The crystal packing includes a weak C—H...O hydrogen bond between an aromatic C—H group and a carboxylic acid O atom to form a two‐dimensional network parallel to (10). The C—S—C bond angle in (II) is larger than its counterpart in (I), indicating that the S atom of (II) has less p character in its bonding orbitals than that of (I), according to Bent's rule. The crystal structure of (II) includes weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds between the H atoms of the methylene groups and carbonyl O atoms, forming a three‐dimensional network.     

Comparison of the hydrogen‐bond patterns in 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1) and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1)

The X‐ray single‐crystal structure determinations of the chemically related compounds 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, C₂H₄N₃S⁺·C₂HO₄⁻, (I), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), C₂H₃N₃S·2C₄H₆O₄, (II), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₅H₈O₄, (III), and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₆H₁₀O₄, (IV), are reported and their hydrogen‐bonding patterns are compared. The hydrogen bonds are of the types N—H...O or O—H...N and are of moderate strength. In some cases, weak C—H...O interactions are also present. Compound (II) differs from the others not only in the molar ratio of base and acid (1:2), but also in its hydrogen‐bonding pattern, which is based on chain motifs. In (I), (III) and (IV), the most prominent feature is the presence of an R₂²(8) graph‐set motif formed by N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, which are present in all structures except for (I), where only a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds is present, in agreement with the greater acidity of oxalic acid. There are nonbonding S...O interactions present in all four structures. The difference electron‐density maps show a lack of electron density about the S atom along the S...O vector. In all four structures, the carboxylic acid H atoms are present in a rare configuration with a C—C—O—H torsion angle of ∼0°. In the structures of (II)–(IV), the C—C—O—H torsion angle of the second carboxylic acid group has the more common value of ∼|180|°. The dicarboxylic acid molecules are situated on crystallographic inversion centres in (II). The Raman and IR spectra of the title compounds are presented and analysed.     

Synthese,Kristallstruktur und thermischer Abbau von Mg(H2O)6[B12H12] · 6 H2O

Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Thermal Decomposition of Mg(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂] · 6 H₂O By reaction of an aqueous solution of the free acid (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with MgCO₃ and subsequent isothermic evaporation of the resulting solution to dryness, colourless, bead‐shaped single crystals of the dodecahydrate of magnesium dodecahydro closo‐dodecaborate Mg(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂] · 6 H₂O (cubic, F4₁32; a = 1643.21(9) pm, Z = 8) emerge. The crystal structure is best described as a NaTl‐type arrangement in which the centers of gravity of the quasi‐icosahedral [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— anions (d(B—B) = 178—180 pm, d(B—H) = 109 pm) occupy the positions of Tl^— while the Mg²⁺ cations occupy the Na⁺ positions. A direct coordinative influence of the [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— units at the Mg²⁺ cations is however not noticeable. The latter are octahedrally coordinated by six water molecules forming isolated hexaaqua complex cations [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ (d(Mg—O) = 206 pm, 6×). In addition, six “zeolitic” water molecules are located in the crystal structure for the formation of a strong O—H^δ+···^δ—O‐hydrogen bridge‐bonding system. The evidence of weak B—H^δ—···^δ+H—O‐hydrogen bonds between water molecules and anionic [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— clusters is also considered. Investigations on the dodecahydrate Mg[B₁₂H₁₂] · 12 H₂O (≡ Mg(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂] · 6 H₂O) by DTA/TG measurements showed that its dehydration takes place in two steps within a temperature range of 71 and 76 °C as well as at 202 °C, respectively. Thermal treatment eventually leads to the anhydrous magnesium dodecahydro closo‐dodecaborate Mg[B₁₂H₁₂].     

Polysulfonylamines. CXXXII.

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₁₂H₁₀NO₄S₂⁻, consists of two independent cation–anion pairs, A and B. Within each pair, the H—N—C—N*—H grouping (N*—H is the pyridinium function) and one N—S—O moiety of the anion are linked by N*—H⃛N and N—H⃛O hydrogen bonds to form an antidromic ring motif of type R²₂(8). The remaining amino donors give rise to N—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, connecting the ion pairs into A–B–A–B– chains. The structure testifies to the persistence of the R²₂(8) motif in question, which was previously detected as a highly robust supramolecular synthon in a series of onium di(methane­sulfonyl)­amidates. The structure is pseudosymmetric; the anion positions correspond to space group P2₁/n, but those of the cations do not.     

Ferrocene compounds. XXXIV. 1′‐(tert‐Butoxycarbonylamino)ferrocene‐1‐carboxylic acid

Heteroannularly substituted ferrocene derivatives can act as model systems for various hydrogen‐bonded assemblies of biomol­ecules formed, for instance, by means of O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding. The crystal structure analysis of 1′‐(tert‐butoxy­carbonyl­amino)­ferrocene‐1‐carbox­ylic acid, [Fe(C₁₀H₁₄NO₂)(C₆H₅O₂)] or (C₅H₄COOH)Fe(C₅­H₄NHCOOC(CH₃)₃, reveals two independent mol­ecules within the asymmetric unit, and these are joined into discrete dimers by two types of intermolecular hydrogen bonds, viz. O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O. The –COOH and –NHCOOR groups are archetypes for dimer formation via two eight‐membered rings. The O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds [2.656 (3) and 2.663 (3) Å] form a cyclic carboxylic acid dimer motif. Another eight‐membered ring is formed by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds [2.827 (3) and 2.854 (3) Å] between the N—H group and an O atom of another carbamoyl moiety. The dimers are assembled in a herring‐bone fashion in the bc plane.     

Intermolecular interactions in the chiral and racemic forms of 3‐­hydroxy‐2‐(1‐oxoisoindolin‐2‐yl)­butanoic acid derived from threonine

The title compounds, C₁₂H₁₃NO₄, are derived from l ‐threonine and dl ‐threonine, respectively. Hydro­gen bonding in the chiral derivative, (2S/3R)‐3‐hydroxy‐2‐(1‐oxoisoindolin‐2‐yl)­butanoic acid, consists of O—H_acid?O_alkyl—H?O=C_indole chains [O?O 2.659 (3) and 2.718 (3) Å], Csp³—H?O and three C—H?π_arene interactions. In the (2R,3S/2S,3R) racemate, conventional carboxylic acid hydrogen bonding as cyclical (O—H?O=C)₂ [graph set R₂²(8)] is present, with O_alkyl—H?O=C_indole, Csp³—H?O and C—H?π_arene interactions. The COOH group geometry differs between the two forms, with C—O, C=O, C—C—O and C—C=O bond lengths and angles of 1.322 (3) and 1.193 (3) Å, and 109.7 (2) and 125.4 (3)°, respectively, in the chiral structure, and 1.2961 (17) and 1.2210 (18) Å, and 113.29 (12) and 122.63 (13)°, respectively, in the racemate structure. The O—C=O angles of 124.9 (3) and 124.05 (14)° are similar. The differences arise from the contrasting COOH hydrogen‐bonding environments in the two structures.     

Electronic structure,novel synthesis,and O—H...O and C—H...O interactions in two 6‐oxopiperidine‐2‐carboxylic acid derivatives

Molecules of (S)‐6‐oxo‐1‐(thiophen‐2‐ylmethyl)piperidine‐2‐carboxylic acid, C₁₁H₁₃NO₃S, crystallize as single enantiomers in the space group P2₁ and the thiophene ring is disordered over two positions, while (S)‐6‐oxo‐1‐(thiophen‐3‐ylmethyl)piperidine‐2‐carboxylic acid, C₁₁H₁₃NO₃S, crystallizes as a single enantiomer in the space group P2₁2₁2₁. Their absolute configurations were confirmed by anomalous dispersion effects in diffraction measurements on the crystals. The molecules of each compound are linked by a combination of strong O—H...O hydrogen bonds and weak C—H...O interactions, resulting in two‐ and three‐dimensional networks, respectively, in the crystal structures.     

Aquabromo(6‐carboxypyridine‐2‐carboxylato‐O,N,O′)mercury(II)

The title compound, [HgBr(C₇H₄NO₄)(H₂O)], was obtained by the reaction of an aqueous solution of mercury(II) bromide and pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxylic acid (picolinic acid, dipicH₂). The shortest bond distances to Hg are Hg—Br 2.412 (1) Å and Hg—N 2.208 (5) Å; the corresponding N—Hg—Br angle of 169.6 (1)° corresponds to a slightly distorted linear coordination. There are also four longer Hg—O interactions, three from dipicH^? [2.425 (4) and 2.599 (4) Å within the asymmetric unit, and 2.837 (4) Å from a symmetry‐related mol­ecule] and one from the bonded water mol­ecule [2.634 (4) Å]. The effective coordination of Hg can thus be described as 2+4. The mol­ecules are connected to form double‐layer chains parallel to the y axis by strong O—H?O hydrogen bonds between carboxylic acid groups of neighbouring mol­ecules, and by weaker hydrogen bonds involving both H atoms of the water mol­ecule and the O atoms of the carboxylic acid groups.     

Hydro­gen‐bonding patterns in cis‐4‐ammonio­cyclo­hexane­carboxyl­ate hemihydrate

In the title compound, C₇H₁₃NO₂·0.5H₂O, cis‐4‐amino­cyclo­hexane­carboxylic acid exists as a zwitterion and co‐crystallizes with water mol­ecules in a 2:1 amino acid–water ratio. The cyclo­hexane ring adopts a chair conformation, with the carboxyl­ate and ammonium groups in axial and equatorial positions, respectively. The basic motif in the crystal structure is a sandwich structure, formed by two amino acid units linked by head‐to‐tail hydrogen bonds. Hydro­gen bonds of the type N⁺—H⋯O—C—O⁻ link these motifs, forming helicoidally extended chains running along the c axis. The water molecule lies on a twofold axis and interacts with the chains by means of O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

Intermolecular dihydrogen‐ and hydrogen‐bonding interactions in diammonium closo‐decahydrodecaborate sesquihydrate

The asymmetric unit of the title salt, 2NH₄⁺·B₁₀H₁₀²⁻·1.5H₂O or (NH₄)₂B₁₀H₁₀·1.5H₂O, (I), contains two B₁₀H₁₀²⁻ anions, four NH₄⁺ cations and three water molecules. (I) was converted to the anhydrous compound (NH₄)₂B₁₀H₁₀, (II), by heating to 343 K and its X‐ray powder pattern was obtained. The extended structure of (I) shows two types of hydrogen‐bonding interactions (N—H...O and O—H...O) and two types of dihydrogen‐bonding interactions (N—H...H—B and O—H...H—B). The N—H...H—B dihydrogen bonding forms a two‐dimensional sheet structure, and hydrogen bonding (N—H...O and O—H...O) and O—H...H—B dihydrogen bonding link the respective sheets to form a three‐dimensional polymeric network structure. Compound (II) has been shown to form a polymer with the accompanying loss of H₂ at a faster rate than (NH₄)₂B₁₂H₁₂ and we believe that this is due to the stronger dihydrogen‐bonding interactions shown in the hydrate (I).     

Hydrogen bonding in cyclic imides and amide carboxylic acid derivatives from the facile reaction of cis‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐carboxylic anhydride with o‐ and p‐anisidine and m‐ and p‐aminobenzoic acids

The structures of the open‐chain amide carboxylic acid rac‐cis‐2‐[(2‐methoxyphenyl)carbamoyl]cyclohexane‐1‐carboxylic acid, C₁₅H₁₉NO₄, (I), and the cyclic imides rac‐cis‐2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐3a,4,5,6,7,7a‐hexahydroisoindole‐1,3‐dione, C₁₅H₁₇NO₃, (II), chiral cis‐3‐(1,3‐dioxo‐3a,4,5,6,7,7a‐hexahydroisoindol‐2‐yl)benzoic acid, C₁₅H₁₅NO₄, (III), and rac‐cis‐4‐(1,3‐dioxo‐3a,4,5,6,7,7a‐hexahydroisoindol‐2‐yl)benzoic acid monohydrate, C₁₅H₁₅NO₄·H₂O, (IV), are reported. In the amide acid (I), the phenylcarbamoyl group is essentially planar [maximum deviation from the least‐squares plane = 0.060 (1) Å for the amide O atom] and the molecules form discrete centrosymmetric dimers through intermolecular cyclic carboxy–carboxy O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions [graph‐set notation R₂²(8)]. The cyclic imides (II)–(IV) are conformationally similar, with comparable benzene ring rotations about the imide N—C_ar bond [dihedral angles between the benzene and isoindole rings = 51.55 (7)° in (II), 59.22 (12)° in (III) and 51.99 (14)° in (IV)]. Unlike (II), in which only weak intermolecular C—H...O_imide hydrogen bonding is present, the crystal packing of imides (III) and (IV) shows strong intermolecular carboxylic acid O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding associations. With (III), these involve imide O‐atom acceptors, giving one‐dimensional zigzag chains [graph‐set C(9)], while with the monohydrate (IV), the hydrogen bond involves the partially disordered water molecule which also bridges molecules through both imide and carboxy O‐atom acceptors in a cyclic R₄⁴(12) association, giving a two‐dimensional sheet structure. The structures reported here expand the structural database for compounds of this series formed from the facile reaction of cis‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐dicarboxylic anhydride with substituted anilines, in which there is a much larger incidence of cyclic imides compared to amide carboxylic acids.     

Untersuchungen zur Kristallstruktur von Lithium‐dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborat aus wäßriger Lösung: Li2(H2O)7[B12H12]

Investigations on the Crystal Structure of Lithium Dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate from Aqueous Solution: Li₂(H₂O)₇[B₁₂H₁₂] By neutralization of an aqueous solution of the acid (H₃O)₂[B₁₂H₁₂] with lithium hydroxide (LiOH) and subsequent isothermic evaporation of the resulting solution to dryness, it was possible to obtain the heptahydrate of lithium dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate Li₂[B₁₂H₁₂] · 7 H₂O (≡ Li₂(H₂O)₇[B₁₂H₁₂]). Its structure has been determined from X‐ray single crystal data at room temperature. The compound crystallizes as colourless, lath‐shaped, deliquescent crystals in the orthorhombic space group Cmcm with the lattice constants a = 1215.18(7), b = 934.31(5), c = 1444.03(9) pm and four formula units in the unit cell. The crystal structure of Li₂(H₂O)₇[B₁₂H₁₂] can not be described as a simple AB₂‐structure type. Instead it forms a layer‐like structure analogous to the well‐known barium compound Ba(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂]. Characteristic feature is the formation of isolated cation pairs [Li₂(H₂O)₇]²⁺ in which the water molecules form two [Li(H₂O)₄]⁺ tetrahedra with eclipsed conformation, linked to a dimer via a common corner. The bridging oxygen atom (∢(Li‐ O ‐Li) = 112°) thereby formally substitutes Ba²⁺ in Ba(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂] according to (H₂ O )Li₂(H₂O)₆[B₁₂H₁₂]. A direct coordinative influence of the [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— cluster anions to the Li⁺ cations is not noticeable, however. The positions of the hydrogen atoms of both the water molecules and the [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— units have all been localized. In addition, the formation of B‐H^δ—···^δ+H‐O‐hydrogen bonds between the water molecules and the hydrogen atoms from the anionic [B₁₂H₁₂]^2— clusters is considered and their range and strength is discussed. The dehydratation of the heptahydrate has been investigated by DTA‐TG measurements and shown to take place in two steps at 56 and 151 °C, respectively. Thermal treatment leads to the anhydrous lithium dodecahydro‐closo‐dodecaborate Li₂[B₁₂H₁₂], eventually.     

The cocrystal of 3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoic acid and 4,4′‐bipyridine

4,4′‐Bipyridine cocrystallizes with 3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoic acid in a 1:2 ratio to give a centrosymmetric three‐component supra­molecular adduct, namely 3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoic acid–4,4′‐bipyridine (2/1), C₁₁H₈O₃·0.5C₁₀H₈N₂, in which 4,4′‐bipyridine is located on an inversion center. The pyridine–carboxylic acid heterosynthon generates an infinite one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain viaπ–π inter­actions between naphthyl and 4,4′‐bipyridine groups. The one‐dimensional chains are further assembled into a three‐dimensional network by weak C—H⋯π inter­actions between pyridyl and naphthyl rings, and C—H⋯O inter­actions between 3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoic acid mol­ecules.     

Crystal structures,thermal stabilities,and dissolution behaviours of tinidazole and the tinidazole–vanillic acid cocrystal: insights from energy frameworks

The crystal structures of the antimicrobial drug tinidazole [ TNZ ; systematic name: 1‐(2‐ethylsulfonylethyl)‐2‐methyl‐5‐nitroimidazole, C₈H₁₃N₃O₄S] and the 1:1 cocrystal of TNZ with the naturally occurring compound vanillic acid ( VA ; systematic name: 4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxybenzoic acid, C₈H₈O₄), namely, the TNZ – VA cocrystal, were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis at 100 K. The supramolecular structure of the TNZ – VA cocrystal is composed of a carboxylic acid dimer and an O—H…N(heterocycle) synthon in the form of layers made up of O—H…N and O—H…O hydrogen bonds. The layers are joined via C—H…O hydrogen bonds, π–π stacking and C—H…π interactions. The energy framework analysis, together with interaction energy calculations using the DLPNO‐CCSD(T) method, indicates that the TNZ – VA cocrystal inherits strong interactions from the TNZ and VA crystals, which accounts for the enhanced thermal stability and reduced dissolution rate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a cocrystal containing TNZ .     

The epimeric 9‐oxobicyclo[3.3.1]nonane‐3‐carboxylic acids: hydrogen‐bonding patterns of the endo acid and the lactol of the exo acid

The two δ‐keto carboxylic acids of the title, both C₁₀H₁₄O₃, are epimeric at the site of carboxyl attachment. The endo (3α) epimer, (I), has its keto‐acid ring in a boat conformation, with the tilt of the carboxyl group creating conformational chirality. The mol­ecules form hydrogen bonds by centrosymmetric pairing of carboxyl groups across the corners of the chosen cell [O⃛O = 2.671 (2) Å and O—H⃛O = 179 (2)°]. Two close intermolecular C—H⃛O contacts exist for the ketone. The exo (3β) epimer exists in the closed ring–chain tautomeric form as the lactol, 8‐hydroxy‐9‐oxatri­cyclo­[5.3.1.0^3,8]­undecan‐10‐one, (II). The mol­ecules have conformational chirality, and the hydrogen‐bonding scheme involves intermolecular hydroxyl‐to‐carbonyl chains of mol­ecules screw‐related in b [O⃛O = 2.741 (2) Å and O—H⃛O = 177 (2)°].     

A two‐dimensional network in the molecular salt 2‐methylimidazolium hydrogen glutarate,and three‐dimensional networks in the salts 2‐methylimidazolium hydrogen succinate and 2‐methylimidazolium hydrogen adipate monohydrate

All three title compounds, C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₄⁻, (I), C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₅H₇O₄⁻, (II), and C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₆H₉O₄⁻·H₂O, (III), can be regarded as 1:1 organic salts. The dicarboxylic acids join through short acid bridges into infinite chains. Compound (I) crystallizes in the noncentrosymmetric Cmc2₁ space group and the asymmetric unit consists of a hydrogen succinate anion located on a mirror plane and a 2‐methylimidazolium cation disordered across the same mirror. The other two compounds crystallize in the triclinic P space group. The carboxylic acid H atom in (II) is disordered over both ends of the anion and sits on inversion centres between adjacent anions, forming symmetric short O...H...O bridges. Two independent anions in (III) sit across inversion centres, again with the carboxylic acid H atom disordered in short O...H...O bridges. The molecules in all three compounds are linked into two‐dimensional networks by combinations of imidazolium–carboxylate N⁺—H...O and carboxylate–carboxylate O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The two‐dimensional networks are further linked into three‐dimensional networks by C—H...O hydrogen bonds in (I) and by O_water—H...O hydrogen bonds in (III). According to the ΔpK_a rule, such 1:1 types of organic salts can be expected unambiguously. However, a 2:1 type of organic salt may be more easily obtained in (II) and (III) than in (I).     

Planarity of benzoylhydrazine–dithiocarbazoate tuberculostatics. I. N′‐Methyl‐substituted 3,4‐dichlorobenzoyl monoesters

Methyl 2‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzoyl)‐1‐methylhydrazinecarbodithioate, C₁₀H₁₀Cl₂N₂OS₂, (F1), butyl 2‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzoyl)‐1‐methylhydrazinecarbodithioate, C₁₃H₁₆Cl₂N₂OS₂, (F2), and 3,4‐dichloro‐N‐(2‐sulfanylidene‐1,3‐thiazinan‐3‐yl)benzamide, C₁₁H₁₀Cl₂N₂OS₂, (F3), were studied by X‐ray diffraction to test our hypothesis that planarity of aryloylhydrazinedithiocarbazic acid esters is a prerequisite for tuberculostatic activity. All compounds examined in this study are inactive and nonplanar due to twists along two specific bonds in the central frame of the molecules. The significant twist at the N—N bond, with an C—N—N—C(S) torsion angle of about 85°, results from repulsion caused by a methyl substituent at the N′ atom of the hydrazide group. The other twist is that within the benzoyl group at the C(O)—Ph bond, i.e. the N—C(=O)—C(phenyl)—C torsion angle: the values found in the studied structures (25–30°) are in agreement with those observed in other compounds containing a similar fragment. As some nonplanar benzoyl derivatives are active, it seems that planarity of the hydrazinedithioate fragment is more important for tuberculostatic activity than planarity of the aryloyl group.