Using Efficient Anchoring Points for Generating Search Directions in Interior Multiobjective Linear Programming

This paper modifies the affine-scaling primal algorithm to multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problems. The modification is based on generating search directions in the form of projected gradients augmented by search directions pointing toward what we refer to as anchoring points. These anchoring points are located on the boundary of the feasible region and, together with the current, interior, iterate, define a cone in which we make the next step towards a solution of the MOLP problem. These anchoring points can be generated in more than one way. In this paper we present an approach that generates efficient anchoring points where the choice of termination solution available to the decision maker at each iteration consists of a set of efficient solutions. This set of efficient solutions is being updated during the iterative process so that only the most preferred solutions are retained for future considerations. Current MOLP algorithms are simplex-based and make their progress toward the optimal solution by following an exterior trajectory along the vertices of the constraints polytope. Since the proposed algorithm makes its progress through the interior of the constraints polytope, there is no need for vertex information and, therefore, the search for an acceptable solution may prove less sensitive to problem size. We refer to the resulting class of MOLP algorithms that are based on the affine-scaling primal algorithm as affine-scaling interior multiobjective linear programming (ASIMOLP) algorithms.     

An Outer Approximation Algorithm for Generating All Efficient Extreme Points in the Outcome Set of a Multiple Objective Linear Programming Problem

Various difficulties have been encountered in using decision set-based vector maximization methods to solve a multiple objective linear programming problem (MOLP). Motivated by these difficulties, some researchers in recent years have suggested that outcome set-based approaches should instead be developed and used to solve problem (MOLP). In this article, we present a finite algorithm, called the Outer Approximation Algorithm, for generating the set of all efficient extreme points in the outcome set of problem (MOLP). To our knowledge, the Outer Approximation Algorithm is the first algorithm capable of generating this set. As a by-product, the algorithm also generates the weakly efficient outcome set of problem (MOLP). Because it works in the outcome set rather than in the decision set of problem (MOLP), the Outer Approximation Algorithm has several advantages over decision set-based algorithms. It is also relatively easy to implement. Preliminary computational results for a set of randomly-generated problems are reported. These results tangibly demonstrate the usefulness of using the outcome set approach of the Outer Approximation Algorithm instead of a decision set-based approach. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Further Analysis of an Outcome Set-Based Algorithm for Multiple-Objective Linear Programming

Various difficulties have been encountered in using decision set-based vector maximization methods to solve a multiple-objective linear programming problem (MOLP). Motivated by these difficulties, Benson recently developed a finite, outer-approximation algorithm for generating the set of all efficient extreme points in the outcome set, rather than in the decision set, of problem (MOLP). In this article, we show that the Benson algorithm also generates the set of all weakly efficient points in the outcome set of problem (MOLP). As a result, the usefulness of the algorithm as a decision aid in multiple objective linear programming is further enhanced.     

Pruned Pareto-optimal sets for the system redundancy allocation problem based on multiple prioritized objectives

In this paper, a new methodology is presented to solve different versions of multi-objective system redundancy allocation problems with prioritized objectives. Multi-objective problems are often solved by modifying them into equivalent single objective problems using pre-defined weights or utility functions. Then, a multi-objective problem is solved similar to a single objective problem returning a single solution. These methods can be problematic because assigning appropriate numerical values (i.e., weights) to an objective function can be challenging for many practitioners. On the other hand, methods such as genetic algorithms and tabu search often yield numerous non-dominated Pareto optimal solutions, which makes the selection of one single best solution very difficult. In this research, a tabu search meta-heuristic approach is used to initially find the entire Pareto-optimal front, and then, Monte-Carlo simulation provides a decision maker with a pruned and prioritized set of Pareto-optimal solutions based on user-defined objective function preferences. The purpose of this study is to create a bridge between Pareto optimality and single solution approaches.     

An Interior Multiple Objective Primal-dual Linear Programming Algorithm Using Efficient Anchoring Points

We present an interior Multiple Objective Linear Programming (MOLP) algorithm based on the path-following primal-dual algorithm. In contrast to the simplex algorithm, which generates a solution path on the exterior of the constraints polytope by following its vertices, the path-following primal-dual algorithm moves through the interior of the polytope. Interior algorithms lend themselves to modifications capable of addressing MOLP problems in a way that is quite different from current solution approaches. In addition, moving through the interior of the polytope results in a solution approach that is less sensitive to problem size than simplex-based MOLP algorithms. The modification of the interior single-objective algorithm to MOLP problems, as presented here, is accomplished by combining the step direction vectors generated by applying the single-objective algorithm to each of the cost vectors into a combined direction vector along which we step from the current iterate to the next iterate.     

Proper inequality constraints and maximization of index vectors

For obtaining the set of all quasi-supremal index vectors (or all maximal index vectors, or all Pareto-optimal solutions) of a multiple-objective optimization problem, we present, in this paper, the method of proper inequality constraints, which does not rely on any convexity condition at all, but by which one can obtain the entire desired set. This method is based on the observation that optimizing the index of one of the objectives, with some arbitrary bounds assigned to all other objectives, may still result in inferior solutions, unless these bounds areproper. Various necessary and/or sufficient conditions are presented for the properness test.This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. GK-32701.     

Determining maximal efficient faces in multiobjective linear programming problem

Finding an efficient or weakly efficient solution in a multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problem is not a difficult task. The difficulty lies in finding all these solutions and representing their structures. Since there are many convenient approaches that obtain all of the (weakly) efficient extreme points and (weakly) efficient extreme rays in an MOLP, this paper develops an algorithm which effectively finds all of the (weakly) efficient maximal faces in an MOLP using all of the (weakly) efficient extreme points and extreme rays. The proposed algorithm avoids the degeneration problem, which is the major problem of the most of previous algorithms and gives an explicit structure for maximal efficient (weak efficient) faces. Consequently, it gives a convenient representation of efficient (weak efficient) set using maximal efficient (weak efficient) faces. The proposed algorithm is based on two facts. Firstly, the efficiency and weak efficiency property of a face is determined using a relative interior point of it. Secondly, the relative interior point is achieved using some affine independent points. Indeed, the affine independent property enable us to obtain an efficient relative interior point rapidly.     

半定规划的PRP~+共轭梯度法(英文)

本文对半定规划(SDP)的最优性条件提出一价值函数并研究其性质.基此,提出半定规划的PRP+共轭梯度法.为得到PRP+共轭梯度法的收敛性,提出一Armijo-型线搜索.无需水平集有界及迭代点列聚点的存在,算法全局收敛.     

An exact method for computing the nadir values in multiple objective linear programming

In this paper we propose a new method to determine the exact nadir (minimum) criterion values over the efficient set in multiple objective linear programming (MOLP). The basic idea of the method is to determine, for each criterion, the region of the weight space associated with the efficient solutions that have a value in that criterion below the minimum already known (by default, the minimum in the payoff table). If this region is empty, the nadir value has been found. Otherwise, a new efficient solution is computed using a weight vector picked from the delimited region and a new iteration is performed. The method is able to find the nadir values in MOLP problems with any number of objective functions, although the computational effort increases significantly with the number of objectives. Computational experiments are described and discussed, comparing two slightly different versions of the method.     

Prox-Regularization Methods for Generalized Fractional Programming

If a fractional program does not have a unique solution or the feasible set is unbounded, numerical difficulties can occur. By using a prox-regularization method that generates a sequence of auxiliary problems with unique solutions, these difficulties are avoided. Two regularization methods are introduced here. They are based on Dinkelbach-type algorithms for generalized fractional programming, but use a regularized parametric auxiliary problem. Convergence results and numerical examples are presented.     

Computationally Efficient Methods for Calculating the Ideal Solution for MOLP Problems

This paper presents the results of an investigation into computational considerations that are relevant to large-scale multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problems. Four approaches to obtaining a representation of the ideal solution are compared. Statistics on the number of simplex iterations and CPU time required are analysed for a set of randomly generated multiobjective linear programming problems. Recommendations are made based on the analysis of these results which are applicable to many MOLP solution algorithms.     

Anchoring Points and Cones of Opportunities in Interior Multiobjective Linear Programming

This paper presents a modification of one variant of Karmarkar's interior-point linear programming algorithm to Multiobjective Linear Programming (MOLP) problems. We show that by taking the variant known as the affine-scaling primal algorithm, generating locally-relevant scaling coefficients and applying them to the projected gradients produced by it, we can define what we refer to as anchoring points that then define cones in which we search for an optimal solution through interaction with the decision maker. Currently existing MOLP algorithms are simplex-based and make their progress toward the optimal solution by following the vertices of the constraints polytope. Since the proposed algorithm makes its progress through the interior of the constraints polytope, there is no need for vertex information and, therefore, the search for an optimal solution may prove less sensitive to problem size. We refer to the class of MOLP algorithms resulting from this variant as Affine-Scaling Interior Multiobjective Linear Programming (ASIMOLP) algorithms.     

A modified method for constructing efficient solutions structure of MOLP

This paper deals with a recently proposed algorithm for obtaining all weak efficient and efficient solutions in a multi objective linear programming (MOLP) problem. The algorithm is based on solving some weighted sum problems, and presents an easy and clear solution structure. We first present an example to show that the algorithm may fail when at least one of these weighted sum problems has not a finite optimal solution. Then, the algorithm is modified to overcome this problem. The modified algorithm determines whether an efficient solution exists for a given MOLP and generates the solution set correctly (if exists) without any change in the complexity.     

On globally solving the extended trust-region subproblems

With the help of the newly developed technique—second order cone (SOC) constraints to strengthen the SDP relaxation of the extended trust-region subproblem (eTRS), we modify two recent SDP relaxation based branch and bound algorithms for solving eTRS. Numerical experiments on some types of problems show that the new algorithms run faster for finding the global optimal solutions than the SDP relaxation based algorithms.     

On finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions using classical and evolutionary generating methods

In solving multi-objective optimization problems, evolutionary algorithms have been adequately applied to demonstrate that multiple and well-spread Pareto-optimal solutions can be found in a single simulation run. In this paper, we discuss and put together various different classical generating methods which are either quite well-known or are in oblivion due to publication in less accessible journals and some of which were even suggested before the inception of evolutionary methodologies. These generating methods specialize either in finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions in a single simulation run or specialize in maintaining a good diversity by systematically solving a number of scalarizing problems. Most classical generating methodologies are classified into four groups mainly based on their working principles and one representative method from each group is chosen in the present study for a detailed discussion and for its performance comparison with a state-of-the-art evolutionary method. On visual comparisons of the efficient frontiers obtained for a number of two and three-objective test problems, the results bring out interesting insights about the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. The results should motivate researchers to design hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithms which may be better than each of the individual methods.     

Counterexample and Optimality Conditions in Differentiable Multiobjective Programming

Recently, sufficient optimality theorems for (weak) Pareto-optimal solutions of a multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) were stated in Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 of Ref. 1. In this note, we give a counterexample showing that the theorems of Ref. 1 are not true. Then, by modifying the assumptions of these theorems, we establish two new sufficient optimality theorems for (weak) Pareto-optimal solutions of (MOP); moreover, we give generalized sufficient optimality theorems for (MOP).     

Interactive Compromise Programming

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a solution method for multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) problems. The method, called interactive compromise programming (ICP), offers a practical solution to MOLP problems by combining judgement with an automatic optimization technique in decision-making. This is realised by using the method of compromise programming and the method of a two-person zero-sum game in an iterative way. The method is illustrated by a numerical example.     

Integrating column generation in a method to compute a discrete representation of the non-dominated set of multi-objective linear programmes

In this paper we propose the integration of column generation in the revised normal boundary intersection (RNBI) approach to compute a representative set of non-dominated points for multi-objective linear programmes (MOLPs). The RNBI approach solves single objective linear programmes, the RNBI subproblems, to project a set of evenly distributed reference points to the non-dominated set of an MOLP. We solve each RNBI subproblem using column generation, which moves the current point in objective space of the MOLP towards the non-dominated set. Since RNBI subproblems may be infeasible, we attempt to detect this infeasibility early. First, a reference point bounding method is proposed to eliminate reference points that lead to infeasible RNBI subproblems. Furthermore, different initialisation approaches for column generation are implemented, including Farkas pricing. We investigate the quality of the representation obtained. To demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach, we apply it to an MOLP arising in radiotherapy treatment design. In contrast to conventional optimisation approaches, treatment design using column generation provides deliverable treatment plans, avoiding a segmentation step which deteriorates treatment quality. As a result total monitor units is considerably reduced. We also note that reference point bounding dramatically reduces the number of RNBI subproblems that need to be solved.     

Molp with an interactive assessment of a piecewise linear utility function

The paper presents a methodology for Multi-Objective Linear Programming (MOLP) problems. It relies on three steps: (1) Generation of a subset of feasible efficient solutions (from 10 to 50) as representative as possible of the efficient set. (2) Assessment of an additive utility function using an interactive method (Prefcalc). (3) Optimization of the additive utility function on the original set of feasible alternatives. Following this methodology enables the user to find compromise solutions which can be different from the vertices. It is particularly adapted for large scale linear programs where traditional multiobjective methods would be too costly to use, since the interactive phase is limited to step 2, using Prefcalc on a micro-computer. A micro-computer version of the method (Prefchat) is available.