Activation of Open‐Cage Fullerenes with Ruthenium Carbonyl Clusters

Reactions of the open‐cage fullerene C₆₃NO₂(Py)(Ph)₂ ( 1 ) with [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] produce [Ru₃(CO)₈(μ,η⁵‐C₆₃NO₂(Py)(Ph)₂)] ( 2 ), [Ru₂H(CO)₃(μ,η⁷‐C₆₃N(Py)(Ph)(C₆H₄))] ( 3 ), and [Ru(CO)(Py)₂₍η³‐C₆₃NO₂(Py)(Ph)₂)] ( 4 ), in which the orifice sizes are modified from 12 to 8, 11, and 15‐membered ring, through ruthenium‐mediated C?O and C?C bond activation and formation.     

(η6‐Hexamethylbenzene)(mesidine)­ditriflatoruthenium(II)

The crystal structure of the title complex, (η⁶‐hexamethylbenzene)bis(trifluoromethanesulfonato‐O)(2,4,6‐trimethylanil­ine‐N)ruthenium(II), [Ru(CF₃O₃S)₂(C₁₂H₁₈)(C₉H₁₃N)], is described. The complex has the classic three‐legged piano‐stool structure with a planar arene 1.667 Å from the metal, two monodentate O‐bound tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate ligands [Ru—O 2.169 (2) and 2.174 (2) Å] and one N‐bound mesidine ligand [Ru—N 2.198 (2) Å]. The Ru—N distance is relatively long and the average Ru—O distance is relatively short when compared with previously characterized Ru^II complexes.     

A μ‐chloro‐bridged dinuclear ruthenium complex with 9H‐carbazole: the formation of one‐dimensional linear chains of star‐shaped edge‐fused rings

The title complex, di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­[chloro­(η⁶‐p‐cymene)ruthenium(II)]–9H‐carbazole (1/2), [Ru₂Cl₄(C₁₀H₁₄)₂]·2C₁₂H₉N, is composed of one [RuCl₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)]₂ and two 9H‐carbazole mol­ecules. There are one‐half of a dinuclear complex and one 9H‐carbazole mol­ecule per asymmetric unit. In the dinuclear complex, each of the two crystallographically equivalent Ru atoms is in a pseudo‐tetra­hedral environment, coordinated by a terminal Cl atom, two bridging Cl atoms and the aromatic hydro­carbon, which is linked in a η⁶ manner; the Ru⋯Ru separation is 3.688 (3) Å. The title complex has a crystallographic centre of symmetry located at the mid‐point of the Ru⋯Ru line. Inter­molecular N—H⋯Cl and π–π stacking inter­actions are observed. These inter­actions form a four‐pointed star‐shaped ring and one‐dimensional linear chains of edge‐fused rings running parallel to the [100] direction, which stabilize the crystal packing.     

An anthracene dimer with a fused 1,3‐dithiole ring at 193 K

The first butterfly‐shaped anthracene dimer including S atoms,8,9‐di­hydro‐3a,8[1′,2′]:9,13b[1′′,2′′]­di­benzeno­dibenzo­[3,4:7,8]cyclo­octa­[1,2‐d]‐1,3‐di­thiole, C₂₉H₂₀S₂, contains an exceptionally long Csp³—Csp³ bond of 1.672 (2) Å in the fused 1,3‐di­thiole ring. The length of the other bond bridging the anthracene moieties is 1.604 (3) Å.     

A trichloro‐bridged binuclear ruthenium complex with 1,1,1‐tris(diphenylphosphinomethyl)ethane

The tri­chloro‐bridged dinuclear Ru^II complex tri‐μ‐chloro‐bis{[1,1,1‐tris­(di­phenyl­phosphino­methyl)­ethane‐κ³P,P′,P′′]ruthenium(II)} hexa­fluoro­phosphate ethanol solvate, [Ru₂Cl₃(tripod)₂]PF₆·C₂H₆O, containing the tripod [1,1,1‐tris­(di­phenyl­phosphino­methyl)­ethane, C₄₁H₃₉P₃] ligand, was unexpectedly obtained from the reaction of [Ru^IIICl₃(tripod)] with 1,4‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­butane (dppb), followed by pre­cipitation with NH₄PF₆. The magnetic moment of the compound at room temperature indicates that the dinuclear [Ru₂(μ‐Cl)₃(tripod)₂]⁺ cation is diamagnetic. A single‐crystal X‐ray structure determination revealed that the two Ru atoms are bridged by the three Cl atoms. The coordination sphere of each Ru atom is completed by the three P atoms of a tripod ligand. The two P₃Ru units are exactly eclipsed, while the bridging Cl atoms are staggered with respect to the six P atoms. The Ru⋯Ru distance is 3.3997 (7) Å and the mean Cl—Ru—Cl bond angle is 77.7°.     

Derivatives of substituted 3‐trichlorogermylpropionic acid

The central Ge atoms in the structures of 3‐(2‐fluoro­phenyl)‐3‐(tri­phenyl­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₆H₅)₃(C₉H₈FO₂)], 3‐(2‐tolyl)‐3‐(tri‐4‐tolyl­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₇H₇)₃(C₁₀H₁₁O₂)], and 3‐(4‐tolyl)‐3‐(tri­benzyl­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₇H₇)₃(C₁₀H₁₁O₂)], are four‐coordinate with slightly distorted tetrahedral geometry. The Ge—Csp³ distances [1.970 (3)–1.997 (3) Å] are significantly longer than the Ge—C_aromatic distances [1.940 (3)–1.959 (2) Å]. In all three structures, the mol­ecules form dimeric pairs about inversion centres through strong hydrogen‐bonding interactions between carboxyl­ic acid groups.     

[η6‐1‐Chloro‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)benzene](η5‐cyclopentadienyl)iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate and (η5‐cyclopentadienyl){2‐[η6‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)phenyl]phenol}iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate

In the complex salt [η⁶‐1‐chloro‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)benzene](η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl)iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₀H₁₂ClN)]PF₆, (I), the complexed cyclopentadienyl and benzene rings are almost parallel, with a dihedral angle between their planes of 2.3 (3)°. In a related complex salt, (η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl){2‐[η⁶‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)phenyl]phenol}iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₆H₁₇NO)]PF₆, (II), the analogous angle is 5.4 (1)°. In both complexes, the aromatic C atom bound to the pyrrolidine N atom is located out of the plane defined by the remaining five ring C atoms. The dihedral angles between the plane of these five ring atoms and a plane defined by the N‐bound aromatic C atom and two neighboring C atoms are 9.7 (8) and 5.6 (2)° for (I) and (II), respectively.     

A ferrocenyl‐substituted pseudo­titanocene complex

The title compound, (η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)[(1,2,3,4,5‐η)‐4‐ferro­cenyl‐1,2,5,6‐tetrakis­(tri­methyl­silyl)­cyclo­hexa‐2,4‐dien‐1‐yl]­titanium(II), [TiFe(C₅H₅)₂(C₂₃H₄₂Si₄)] or [Ti{η⁵‐C₆H₂{Fe­(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁵‐C₅H₅)}{Si(CH₃)₃}₄}(η⁵‐C₅H₅)], possesses two directly linked metallocene units that subtend an angle of 52.9 (1)° (defined by the least‐squares planes of the directly connected π‐ligands) associated with the steric requirements of the bulky tri­methyl­silyl substituents. The cyclo­hexa­dienyl ligand adopts an envelope conformation; the perpendicular distance of its η⁵‐plane to the Ti atom is 1.512 (1) Å.     

The first metalloporphyrin dimer linked by a bridging phenylenedicarbene ligand

In the first bis­[ruthenium(II)–porphyrin]–dicarbene complex, μ‐[1,4‐phenyl­ene­bis(phenyl­methyl­idene‐κC)]bis­[(ethanol‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)ruthenium(II)] 1,2‐di­chloro­ethane trisolvate, [Ru₂(C₂₀H₁₄)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)₂(C₂H₆O)₂]·3C₂H₄Cl₂, an inversion center is located at the center of the μ‐phenyl­ene group, leading to a parallel arrangement for the pair of porphyrin ring systems. The bond lengths and angles compare favourably with literature values for ruthenium–porphyrin–monocarbene complexes; the Ru=C(carbene) bond length and the C(phenyl)—C(carbene)—C(phenyl­ene) angle are 1.865 (3) Å and 112.3 (3)°, respectively. The Ru^II ion is displaced out of the C₂₀N₄ porphyrin least‐squares plane (by 0.2373 Å) toward the bridging ligand of the C_i‐symmetry dimer. The porphyrin ring systems of the dimer thus exhibit mildly domed conformations.     

Azido­[1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene](penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate

In the title compound, azido‐2κN‐bis­[μ‐(1η⁵:2κP)‐di­phenyl­phosphino­cyclo­penta­dienyl][2(η⁵)‐penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­di­enyl]­iron(III)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [{Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)(N₃)}{Fe(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂}]PF₆ or [FeRh(C₁₀H₁₅)(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂(N₃)]PF₆, the coordination sphere of Rh^III can be described as pseudo‐tetrahedral, composed of two P atoms from a 1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene (dppf) ligand, an azido N atom and the centroid of the ring of a C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ligand. The two cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in the dppf moiety adopt an eclipsed conformation. The Rh⋯Fe distance is 4.340 (2) Å.     

Darstellung und Strukturen von (η6‐Diaren)TiII‐bis(tetrachloroaluminat)Komplexen,Diaren = Biphenyl oder 3,5,3′,5′‐Tetramethyl‐biphenyl

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of (η⁶‐Diarene)Ti^II‐bis(tetrachloroaluminate) Complexes, Diarene = Biphenyl or 3,5,3′,5′‐Tetramethyl‐biphenyl Syntheses of (η⁶‐diarene)Ti^II(AlCl₄)₂ complexes were performed by the Fischer‐Hafner method. The diarenes employed were biphenyl and 3,5,3′,5′‐tetramethyl‐biphenyl. In each of the resulting complexes, (η⁶‐C₁₂H₁₀)Ti^II(AlCl₄)₂ ( 1 ) and (η⁶‐C₁₆H₁₈)Ti^II(AlCl₄)₂ ( 2 ), only one C₆‐ring of a diarene is coordinatively active. 1 : Space group Pbca, Z = 8, lattice constants at 20 °C: a = 16.864(3), b = 13.931(3), c = 18.807(3) Å; R₁ = 0.048. 2 : Space group P2₁/n, Z = 4, lattice constants at 20 °C: a = 9.775(1), b = 13.720(1), c = 20.214(1) Å; β = 95.50(1)°; R₁ = 0.050.     

The synthesis and reactivity of some indenyl and bis-indenyl ruthenium carbonyl complexes

The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] (1), with indene in refluxing xylene affords [{(η⁵-C₉H₇)Ru(CO)₂}₂] (2), in high yield. An analogous reaction of 1 with 2-phenylindene affords the expected dinuclear complex [{(η⁵-C₉H₆Ph)Ru(CO)₂}₂] (5), and a heptaruthenium cluster [(C₉H₄Ph)Ru₇(μ-H)(μ-CO)₂(CO)₁₆] (6). The indenyl ligand in compound 6 exhibits a novel bonding mode in which the benzenoid ring is μ₄,η¹:η¹:η²:η² bound to the cluster. Refluxing 1 with bis-indenyl methane affords the dinuclear complex [Ru₂(CO)₄{μ-(η⁵-C₉H₆)₂CH₂}] (7), which reacts with iodine via Ru-Ru bond cleavage to give [Ru₂I₂(CO)₄{(η⁵-C₉H₆)₂CH₂}] (8).     

Crystal Structures of [Mn2(H2O)4(phen)2(C4H4O4)2] · 2 H2O and [Mn(phen)2(H2O)2][Mn(phen)2(C4H4O4)](C4H4O4) · 7 H2O

Reactions of 1,10‐phenanthroline monohydrate, Na₂C₄H₄O₄ · 6 H₂O and MnSO₄ · H₂O in CH₃OH/H₂O yielded a mixture of [Mn₂(H₂O)₄(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂] · 2 H₂O ( 1 ) and [Mn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂][Mn(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)](C₄H₄O₄) · 7 H₂O ( 2 ). The crystal structure of 1 (P1 (no. 2), a = 8.257(1) Å, b = 8.395(1) Å, c = 12.879(2) Å, α = 95.33(1)°, β = 104.56(1)°, γ = 106.76(1)°, V = 814.1(2) ų, Z = 1) consists of the dinuclear [Mn₂(H₂O)₄(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂] molecules and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The centrosymmetric dinuclear molecules, in which the Mn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and four O atoms from two H₂O molecules and two bis‐monodentate succinato ligands, are assembled via π‐π stacking interactions into 2 D supramolecular layers parallel to (101) (d(Mn–O) = 2.123–2.265 Å, d(Mn–N) = 2.307 Å). The crystal structure of 2 (P1 (no. 2), a = 14.289(2) Å, b = 15.182(2) Å, c = 15.913(2) Å, α = 67.108(7)°, β = 87.27(1)°, γ = 68.216(8)°, V = 2934.2(7) ų, Z = 2) is composed of the [Mn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ cations, [Mn(phen)₂(C₄H₄O₄)] complex molecules, (C₄H₄O₄)^2– anions, and H₂O molecules. The (C₄H₄O₄)^2– anions and H₂O molecules form 3 D hydrogen bonded network and the cations and complex molecules in the tunnels along [001] and [011], respectively, are assembled via the π‐π stacking interactions into 1 D supramolecular chains. The Mn atoms are octahedrally coordinated by four N atoms of two bidentate chelating phen ligands and two water O atoms or two carboxyl O atoms (d(Mn–O) = 2.088–2.129 Å, d(Mn–N) = 2.277–2.355 Å). Interestingly, the succinato ligands in the complex molecules assume gauche conformation bidentately to chelate the Mn atoms into seven‐membered rings.     

2,5‐Bis(methylthio)‐1,4‐benzo­quinone and 2‐methyl‐3‐(methylsulfonyl)benzo[b]thiophene

The structure of 2,5‐bis­(methyl­thio)‐1,4‐benzo­quinone, C₈H₈O₂S₂, is composed of an essentially planar centrosymmetric benzo­quinone substituted with two methyl­thio groups. The important bond distances are S—Csp³ 1.788 (2) and S—Csp² 1.724 (2) Å, and the two Csp²—Csp² distances are 1.447 (3) and 1.504 (3) Å, which differ significantly. There are short S?S interactions of 3.430 (1) Å and Csp²—H?O‐type contacts forming a dimeric motif with graph set R₂²(8). The structure of 2‐methyl‐3‐(methyl­sulfonyl)­benzo­[b]­thio­phene, C₁₀H₁₀O₂S₂, is composed of an essentially planar benzo­thio­phene moiety substituted with methyl and methyl­sulfonyl groups. The mean values of the important bond distances are endocyclic S—Csp² 1.734 (3), S=O 1.434 (4) and C—C_aromatic 1.389 (10) Å. The exocyclic S—Csp² and S—Csp³ distances are 1.759 (4) and 1.763 (5) Å, respectively.     

Conversion of allene into μ-dimethylcarbene at a diruthenium centre

Treatment of [Ru₂(CO)(μ-CO) {μ-C(O)C₂Ph₂} (η-C ₅H₅)₂] with allene in toluene at 100°C displaces diphenylacetylene and produces [Ru(CO)(η-C₅H₅)-{η³-C₃H₄Ru(CO)₂(η-C₅H₅)}]; upon protonation a 1-methylvinyl cation [Ru₂(CO)₂(μ-CO){μ-C(Me)CH₂}(η-C₅H₅)₂]⁺ is formed which undergoes nucleophillic attack by hydride to yield the μ-dimethylcarbene complex [Ru₂(CO)₂-(μ-CO)(μ-CMe₂)(η-C₅H₅)₂].     

Tetra‐μ‐acetato‐κ2O:O′‐bis[(4‐phenylpyridine‐κN)copper(II)]

The title compound, [Cu₂(C₂H₃O₂)₄(C₁₁H₉N)₂] or [Cu₂(MeCO₂)₄(phpy)₂] (phpy is 4‐phenyl­pyridine), consists of centrosymmetric dimers in which the Cu^II atoms display a square‐pyramidal CuO₄N coordination, with four acetate O atoms in the basal plane [Cu—O 1.975 (3)–1.987 (3) Å] and the phpy N atom in the apical position [Cu—N 2.150 (3) Å]. The Cu atoms are 2.654 (1) Å apart and are bridged by four acetate groups. The discrete dimers are extended into a three‐dimensional supramolecular array through intermolecular π–π‐stacking interactions.     

Structure and catalytic activity of the ruthenium(I) sawhorse‐type complex [Ru2{μ,η2‐CF3(CF2)5COO}2(DMSO)2(CO)4]

The title compound, cis‐di‐μ‐perfluoroheptanoato‐κ⁴O:O′‐bis[dicarbonyl(dimethyl sulfoxide‐κS)ruthenium(I)](Ru—Ru), [Ru₂(C₇F₁₃O₂)₂(C₂H₆OS)₂(CO)₄], is a sawhorse‐type dinuclear ruthenium complex with two bridging perfluoroheptanoate ligands, and with two dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligands in the axial positions coordinating via the S atoms. It is a new example of a compound with an aliphatic fluorinated carboxylate ligand. The Ru—Ru bond distance of 2.6908 (3) Å indicates a direct Ru—Ru interaction. The compound is an active catalyst in transvinylation of propionic acid with vinyl acetate.     

Acetonyl­di­chloro­[(Z)‐2‐chloro‐2‐phenyl­vinyl]­tellurium(IV), helical chains of metal complexes

The primary geometry about the Te^IV atom in the title compound, [TeCl₂(C₈H₆Cl)(C₃H₅O)] or C₁₁H₁₁Cl₃OTe, is a pseudo‐trigonal‐bipyramidal arrangement, with two Cl atoms in apical positions, and the lone pair of electrons and C atoms in the equatorial plane. The Te^IV atom is involved in three secondary interactions, two intramolecular [Te?O = 2.842 (3) Å and Te?Cl3 = 3.209 (1) Å] and one intermolecular [Te?Cl = 3.637 (1) Å], the latter giving rise to a helical chain. These helices are linked by C—H?O interchain interactions.     

Insight into the structures of [M(C5H4I)(CO)3] and [M2(C12H8)(CO)6] (M = Mn and Re) containing strong I...O and π(CO)–π(CO) interactions

The compounds tricarbonyl(η⁵‐1‐iodocyclopentadienyl)manganese(I), [Mn(C₅H₄I)(CO)₃], (I), and tricarbonyl(η⁵‐1‐iodocyclopentadienyl)rhenium(I), [Re(C₅H₄I)(CO)₃], (III), are isostructural and isomorphous. The compounds [μ‐1,2(η⁵)‐acetylenedicyclopentadienyl]bis[tricarbonylmanganese(I)] or bis(cymantrenyl)acetylene, [Mn₂(C₁₂H₈)(CO)₆], (II), and [μ‐1,2(η⁵)‐acetylenedicyclopentadienyl]bis[tricarbonylrhenium(I)], [Re₂(C₁₂H₈)(CO)₆], (IV), are isostructural and isomorphous, and their molecules display inversion symmetry about the mid‐point of the ligand C[triple‐bond]C bond, with the (CO)₃M(C₅H₄) (M = Mn and Re) moieties adopting a transoid conformation. The molecules in all four compounds form zigzag chains due to the formation of strong attractive I...O [in (I) and (III)] or π(CO)–π(CO) [in (I) and (IV)] interactions along the crystallographic b axis. The zigzag chains are bound to each other by weak intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds for (I) and (III), while for (II) and (IV) the chains are bound to each other by a combination of weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds and π(Csp²)–π(Csp²) stacking interactions between pairs of molecules. The π(CO)–π(CO) contacts in (II) and (IV) between carbonyl groups of neighboring molecules, forming pairwise interactions in a sheared antiparallel dimer motif, are encountered in only 35% of all carbonyl interactions for transition metal–carbonyl compounds.     

Synthesis and structural characterisation of [Ru8(μ8-P)(μ2-η1,η6-CH2C6H5)(μ2-CO)2(CO)17]: example of phosphorus encapsulated in a square anti-prism of ruthenium atoms and of an unusual coordination mode for the benzyl group

Reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with an equimolar amount of PPh₂H affords a range of products including an octaruthenium species [Ru₈(μ₈-P)(μ₂-η¹,η⁶-CH₂C₆H₅)(μ₂-CO)₂(CO)₁₇], in which, as established X-ray crystallographically, a phosphorus atom is encapsulated in a square anti-prism of ruthenium atoms and a benzyl group is coordinated to two of these rutheniums through all seven carbon atoms.