Coordination Behavior of a D‐Penicillaminato Aurate(I) Metalloligand Toward Coblat(III) Centers

Treatment of (NH₄)[Au(D‐Hpen‐S)₂](D‐H₂pen = D‐penicillamine) with CoCl₂·6H₂O in an acetate buffer solution, followed by air oxidation, gave neutral Au^ICo^III and anionic Au^I₃Co^III₂ polynuclear complexes, [Au₃Co₃(D‐pen‐N,O,S)₆]([ 1 ]) and [Au₃Co₂(D‐pen‐N,S)₆]^3? ([ 2 ]^3?), which were separated by anion‐exchange column chromatography. Complexes [ 1 ] and [ 2 ]^3? each formed a single isomer, and their structures were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. In [ 1 ], each of three [Au(D‐pen‐S)₂]^3?metalloligands coordinates to two Co^III ions in a bis‐tridentate‐N,O,S mode to form a cyclic Au^I₃Co^III₃ hexanuclear structure, in which three [Co(D‐pen‐N,O,S)₂]^? octahedral units and six bridging S atoms adopt trans(O) geometrical and R chiral configurations, respectively. In [ 2 ]^3?, each of three [Au(D‐pen‐S)₂]^3? metalloligands coordinates to two Co^III ions in a bis‐bidentate‐N,S mode to form a Au^I₃Co^III₂ pentanuclear structure, in which two [Co(D‐pen‐N,S)₃]^3? units and six bridging S atoms adopt ∧ and R chiral configurations, respectively.     

Intramolecular Asymmetric Amidations of Sulfonamides and Sulfamates Catalyzed by Chiral Dirhodium(II) Complexes

Enantioselective intramolecular amidation of aliphatic sulfonamides was achieved for the first time by means of chiral carboxylatodirhodium(II) catalysts in conjunction with PhI(OAc)₂ and MgO in high yields and with enantioselectivities of up to 66% (Scheme 3, Table 1). The best results were obtained with [Rh₂{(S)‐nttl)₄] and [Rh₂{(R)‐ntv)₄] as catalysts ((S)‐nttl=(αS)‐α‐(tert‐butyl)‐1,3‐dioxo‐2H‐benz[de]isoquinoline‐2‐acetato, (R)‐nto=(αR)‐α‐isopropyl‐1,3‐dioxo‐2H‐benz[de] isoquinoline‐2‐acetato). In addition, these carboxylatodirhodium(II) catalysts were also efficient in intramolecular amidations of aliphatic sulfamates esters, although the enantioselectivity of these latter reactions was significantly lower (Scheme 4, Table 3).     

Crystallographic evidence of Gly‐d,l‐Met oxidation to its sulfoxide in the presence of gold(III): solid solution of the racemic mixture of two diastereoisomers

Crystallographic analysis of a solid solution of two diastereoisomers, i.e. ({(1S,R)‐1‐carboxy‐3‐[(R,S)‐methylsulfinyl]propyl}aminocarbonyl)methanaminium tetrachloridoaurate(III) and ({(1S,R)‐1‐carboxy‐3‐[(S,R)‐methylsulfinyl]propyl}aminocarbonyl)methanaminium tetrachloridoaurate(III), (C₇H₁₅N₂O₄S)[AuCl₄], has shown that in the presence of gold(III), the methionine part of the Gly‐d ,l ‐Met dipeptide is oxidized to sulfoxide, and no coordination to the Au^III cation through the S atom of the sulfoxide is observed. In view of our observation, literature reports that methionine acts as an N,S‐bidentate donor ligand forming stable gold(III) complexes require verification. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that crystallization of the oxidation product leads to a substantial 77:23 excess of both S‐methionine/R‐sulfoxide and R‐methionine/S‐sulfoxide over S‐methionine/S‐sulfoxide and R‐methionine/R‐sulfoxide. The presence of two different diastereoisomers at the same crystallographic site is a source of static disorder at this site.     

Synthesis and asymmetric polymerization of (S)‐N‐maleoyl‐L‐leucine propargyl ester

A kind of N‐substituted maleimide (RMI), chiral (S)‐N‐maleoyl‐L ‐leucine propargyl ester ((S)‐PLMI) with a specific rotation of [α]₄₃₅ = ?27.5° was successfully synthesized from maleic anhydride, L ‐leucine, and propargyl alcohol. (S)‐PLMI was polymerized by three polymerization methods to obtain the corresponding optically active polymers. Asymmetric anionic, radical, and transition‐metal‐catalyzed polymerizations were carried out using organometal/chiral ligands, 2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) and (bicyclo [2,2,1]hepta‐2,5‐diene) chloro rhodium (I) dimer ([Rh(nbd) Cl]₂), respectively. Poly((S)‐PLMI) obtained by [Rh(nbd)Cl]₂ in DMF showed the highest specific rotation of ?280.6°. Chiroptical properties and structures of the polymers obtained were investigated by GPC, CD, IR, and NMR measurements. Two types of poly((S)‐PLMI)‐bonded‐silica gels as the chiral stationary phase (CSP) were prepared for high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Their optical resolution abilities were also elucidated. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 3722–3738, 2007     

Indium‐Bridged [1]Ferrocenophanes

Indium‐bridged [1]ferrocenophanes ([1]FCPs) and [1.1]ferrocenophanes ([1.1]FCPs) were synthesized from dilithioferrocene species and indium dichlorides. The reaction of Li₂fc?tmeda (fc=(H₄C₅)₂Fe) and (Mamx)InCl₂ (Mamx=6‐(Me₂NCH₂)‐2,4‐tBu₂C₆H₂) gave a mixture of the [1]FCP (Mamx)Infc ( 4₁ ), the [1.1]FCP [(Mamx)Infc]₂ ( 4₂ ), and oligomers [(Mamx)Infc]_n ( 4 _n ). In a similar reaction, employing the enantiomerically pure, planar‐chiral (S_p,S_p)‐1,1′‐dibromo‐2,2′‐diisopropylferrocene ( 1 ) as a precursor for the dilithioferrocene derivative Li₂fc^iPr2, equipped with two iPr groups in the α position, gave the inda[1]ferrocenophane 5₁ [(Mamx)Infc^iPr2] selectively. Species 5₁ underwent ring‐opening polymerization to give the polymer 5 _n . The reaction between Li₂fc^iPr2 and Ar′InCl₂ (Ar′=2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄) gave an inseparable mixture of the [1]FCP Ar′Infc^iPr2 ( 6₁ ) and the [1.1]FCP [Ar′Infc^iPr2]₂ ( 6₂ ). Hydrogenolysis reactions (BP86/TZ2P) of the four inda[1]ferrocenophanes revealed that the structurally most distorted species ( 5₁ ) is also the most strained [1]FCP.     

Synthesis of chiral fused heterocyclic compounds containing 1,2,4‐triazole ring

A series of new chiral (S)‐3‐ary1‐6‐pyrrolidin‐2‐yl‐[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4‐b]thiadiazole (II_1‐5), (S)‐1‐(3‐aryl‐[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazol‐6‐yl)‐ethylamine (II_6‐8) and (S)‐1,2‐bis(3‐aryl‐[1,2,4]triazolo‐[3,4‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazol‐6‐yl)‐ethylamine (II_9‐11) were prepared by the condensation of 3‐aryl‐4‐amino‐5‐mercapto‐1,2,4‐triazoles with different L‐amino acids in the presence of phosphorus oxychloride and evaluated for their antibacterial activity.     

On the mechanism and stereochemistry of the formation of β‐lactam derivatives of 2,4‐disubstituted‐2,3‐dihydro‐benzo[1,4]diazepines

2‐Chloro‐4‐phenyl‐2a‐(4′‐methoxyphenyl)‐3,5‐dihydroazatetracyclic [1,2‐d]benzo [ 1,4]diazepin‐1 ‐one ( III _a) and 2‐chloro‐4‐methyl‐2a‐(4′‐methoxyphenyl)‐3,5‐dihydroazatetracyclic[1,2‐d]‐benzo[1,4]diazepin‐1‐one ( III _b) were synthesized. 1‐Benzoyl‐2‐phenyl‐4‐(4′‐methoxyphenyl)[1,4]‐benzodiazepine ( II _a) was formed through benzoylation of starting material 2‐phenyl‐4‐(4′‐methoxyphenyl)‐[1,4]benzodiazepine ( I _a) with the inversion of seven‐member ring boat conformation. The thus formed β‐lactams should have four pairs of stereoisomers. However, only one pair of enantiomers (2S,2R,4R) and (2R,2aS,4S) was obtained. The mechanism and stereochemistry of the formation of these compounds were studied on the basis of nmr spectroscopy and further confirmed by X‐ray diffraction.     

Absolute configuration of strictosidinic acid

The absolute configuration of strictosidinic acid, (2S,3R,4S)‐3‐ethenyl‐2‐(β‐d ‐glucopyranosyloxy)‐4‐{[(1S)‐2,3,4,9‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrido[3,4‐b]indol‐1‐yl]methyl}‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐pyran‐5‐carboxylate, was determined from its sodium chloride trihydrate, poly[[diaqua((2S,3R,4S)‐3‐ethenyl‐2‐(β‐d ‐glucopyranosyloxy)‐4‐{[(1S)‐2,3,4,9‐tetrahydro‐1H‐pyrido[3,4‐b]indol‐2‐ium‐1‐yl]methyl}‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐pyran‐5‐carboxylate)sodium] chloride monohydrate], {[Na(C₂₆H₃₂N₂O₉)(H₂O)₂]Cl·H₂O}_n. The strictosidinic acid molecule participates in intermolecular hydrogen bonds of the O—H...O and O—H...Cl types. The solid‐state conformation was observed as a zwitterion, based on a charged pyridine N atom and a carboxylate group, the latter mediating the packing through coordination with the sodium cation.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Chiral Bis(aminato)iridate(I) and Aminato‐Bridged Iridium(I) Complexes

The two dinuclear Ir^I complexes [Ir₂(μ‐Cl)₂ {(R)‐(S)‐PPF‐PPh₂}₂] ( 1 ; (R)‐(S)‐PPF‐PPh₂=(S)‐1‐(diphenylphosphino)‐2‐[(R)‐1‐(diphenylphosphino)ethyl]ferrocene and [Ir₂(μ‐Cl)₂{(R)‐binap}₂] ( 3 ; (R)‐binap=(R)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diylbis[diphenylphosphine]) smoothly react with 4 equiv. of the lithium salt of aniline to afford the new bis(anilido)iridate(I) (=bis(benzenaminato)iridate(1‐)) complexes Li[Ir(NHPh)₂{(R)‐(S)‐PPF‐PPh₂}] ( 4 ) and Li[Ir(NHPh)₂{(R)‐binap}] ( 5 ), respectively. The anionic complexes 4 and 5 react upon protonolysis to give the dinuclear aminato‐bridged derivatives [Ir₂(μ‐NHPh)₂{(R)‐(S)‐PPF‐PPh₂}₂] ( 6 ) and [Ir₂(μ‐NHPh)₂{(R)‐binap}₂] ( 7 ), which were characterized by X‐ray crystallography. None of the new complexes 4 – 7 shows catalytic activity in the hydroamination of olefins.     

Strain‐Induced Double Carbon–Carbon Bond Activations of Cycloparaphenylenes by a Platinum Complex: Application to the Synthesis of Cyclic Diketones

The carbon–carbon (C?C) bond activation of [n]cycloparaphenylenes ([n]CPPs) by a transition‐metal complex is herein reported. The Pt⁰ complex Pt(PPh₃)₄ regioselectively cleaves two C?C σ bonds of [5] CPP and [6]CPP to give cyclic dinuclear platinum complexes in high yields. Theoretical calculations reveal that the relief of ring strain drives the reaction. The cyclic complex was further transformed into a cyclic diketone by using a CO insertion reaction.     

Redox non-innocence of thioether crowns: spectroelectrochemistry and electronic structure of formal nickel(III) complexes of aza-thioether macrocycles

The Ni^II complexes [Ni([9]aneNS₂‐CH₃)₂]²⁺ ([9]aneNS₂‐CH₃=N‐methyl‐1‐aza‐4,7‐dithiacyclononane), [Ni(bis[9]aneNS₂‐C₂H₄)]²⁺ (bis[9]aneNS₂‐C₂H₄=1,2‐bis‐(1‐aza‐4,7‐dithiacyclononylethane) and [Ni([9]aneS₃)₂]²⁺ ([9]aneS₃=1,4,7‐trithiacyclononane) have been prepared and can be electrochemically and chemically oxidized to give the formal Ni^III products, which have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography, UV/Vis and multi‐frequency EPR spectroscopy. The single‐crystal X‐ray structure of [Ni^III([9]aneNS₂‐CH₃)₂](ClO₄)₆?(H₅O₂)₃ reveals an octahedral co‐ordination at the Ni centre, while the crystal structure of [Ni^III(bis[9]aneNS₂‐C₂H₄)](ClO₄)₆?(H₃O)₃? 3H₂O exhibits a more distorted co‐ordination. In the homoleptic analogue, [Ni^III([9]aneS₃)₂](ClO₄)₃, structurally characterized at 30 K, the Ni? S distances [2.249(6), 2.251(5) and 2.437(2) Å] are consistent with a Jahn–Teller distorted octahedral stereochemistry. [Ni([9]aneNS₂‐CH₃)₂](PF₆)₂ shows a one‐electron oxidation process in MeCN (0.2 M NBu₄PF₆, 293 K) at E_1/2=+1.10 V versus Fc⁺/Fc assigned to a formal Ni^III/Ni^II couple. [Ni(bis[9]aneNS₂‐C₂H₄)](PF₆)₂ exhibits a one‐electron oxidation process at E_1/2=+0.98 V and a reduction process at E_1/2=?1.25 V assigned to Ni^II/Ni^III and Ni^II/Ni^I couples, respectively. The multi‐frequency X‐, L‐, S‐, K‐band EPR spectra of the 3+ cations and their 86.2 % ⁶¹Ni‐enriched analogues were simulated. Treatment of the spin Hamiltonian parameters by perturbation theory reveals that the SOMO has 50.6 %, 42.8 % and 37.2 % Ni character in [Ni([9]aneNS₂‐CH₃)₂]³⁺, [Ni(bis[9]aneNS₂‐C₂H₄)]³⁺ and [Ni([9]aneS₃)₂]³⁺, respectively, consistent with DFT calculations, and reflecting delocalisation of charge onto the S‐thioether centres. EPR spectra for [⁶¹Ni([9]aneS₃)₂]³⁺ are consistent with a dynamic Jahn–Teller distortion in this compound.     

Telaprevir: helical chains based on three‐point hydrogen‐bond connections

The crystal structure of the title compound [systematic name: (1S,3aR,6aS)‐2‐((2S)‐2‐{[(2S)‐2‐cyclohexyl‐2‐(pyrazine‐2‐carbonylamino)acetyl]amino}‐3,3‐dimethylbutanoyl)‐N‐[(3S)‐1‐(cyclopropylamino)‐1,2‐dioxohexan‐3‐yl]‐3,3a,4,5,6,6a‐hexahydro‐1H‐cyclopenta[c]pyrrole‐1‐carboxamide], C₃₆H₅₃N₇O₆, contains two independent molecules, which possess distinct conformations and a disordered cyclopenta[c]pyrrolidine unit. In the crystal, molecules are linked into helical chains via three‐point N—H...O hydrogen‐bond connections in which three NH and three carbonyl groups per molecule are utilized. The chiralities of the six stereocentres per molecule inferred from this study are in agreement with the synthetic procedure.     

Two stereoisomeric pentacyclic oxin­dole alkaloids from Uncaria tomentosa: uncarine C and uncarine E

The chloro­form solvate of uncarine C (pteropodine), (1′S,3R,4′aS,5′aS,10′aS)‐1,2,5′,5′a,7′,8′,10′,10′a‐octa­hydro‐1′‐methyl‐2‐oxospiro­[3H‐indole‐3,6′(4′aH)‐[1H]­pyrano­[3,4‐f]indolizine]‐4′‐carboxyl­ic acid methyl ester, C₂₁H₂₄N₂O₄·CHCl₃, has an absolute configuration with the spiro C atom in the R configuration. Its epimer at the spiro C atom, uncarine E (isopteropodine), (1′S,3S,4′aS,5′aS,10′aS)‐1,2,5′,5′a,7′,8′,10′,10′a‐octahydro‐1′‐methyl‐2‐oxospiro[3H‐indole‐3,6′(4′aH)‐[1H]pyrano[3,4‐f]indolizine]‐4′‐carboxylic acid methyl ester, C₂₁H₂₄N₂O₄, has Z′ = 3, with no solvent. Both form intermolecular hydrogen bonds involving only the ox­indole, with N?O distances in the range 2.759 (4)–2.894 (5) Å.     

Two New Iridoid Glycosides from Hedyotis tenelliflora Blume

Two new iridoid glycosides, teneoside A (=(2aR,5S)‐5‐[(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]‐2a,4a,5,7b‐tetrahydro‐4‐{[(α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl)oxy]methyl}‐1H‐2,6‐dioxacyclopenta[cd]inden‐1‐one; 1 ) and teneoside B (=methyl (1S,5R)‐1‐[(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]‐1,4a,5,7a‐tetrahydro‐5‐hydroxy‐7‐{[(α‐L ‐rhamnopyranosyl)oxy]methyl}cyclopenta[c]pyran‐4‐carboxylate; 2 ), were isolated from the roots of Hedyotis tenelliflora Blume , along with two known compounds, deacetylasperuloside ( 3 ) and scandoside methyl ester ( 4 ). Their structures were elucidated by chemical methods (acid hydrolysis) and spectroscopic analyses.     

Influence of Ring Annelation on the Mode Selectivity of the Ionized Diazabicycloheptenes and Corresponding Housanes: An ESR and ENDOR Study

The tricyclic azoalkanes, (1α,4α,4aα,7aα)‐4,4a,5,6,7,7a‐hexahydro‐1,4,8,8‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclopenta[d]pyridazine ( 1c ), (1α,4α,4aα,6aα)‐4,4a,5,6,6a‐pentahydro‐1,4,7,7‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclobuta[d]pyridazine ( 1d ), (1α,4α,4aα,6aα)‐4,4a,6a‐trihydro‐1,4,7,7‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclobuta[d]pyridazine ( 1e ), and (1α,4α,4aα,5aα)‐4,4a,5,5a‐tetrahydro‐1,4,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclopropa[d]pyridazine ( 1f ), as well as the corresponding housanes, the 2,3,3,4‐tetramethyl‐substituted tricyclo[3.3.0.0^2,4]octane ( 2c ), tricyclo[3.2.0.0^2,4]heptane ( 2d ), and tricyclo[3.2.0.0^2,4]hept‐6‐ene ( 2e ), were subjected to γ‐irradiation in Freon matrices. The reaction products were identified with the use of ESR and, in part, ENDOR spectroscopy. As expected, the strain on the C‐framework increases on going from the cyclopentane‐annelated azoalkanes and housanes ( 1c and 2c ) to those annelated by cyclobutane ( 1d and 2d ), by cyclobutene ( 1e and 2e ), and by cyclopropane ( 1f ). Accordingly, the products obtained from 1c and 2c in all three Freons used, CFCl₃, CF₃CCl₃, and CF₂ClCFCl₂, were the radical cations 3c ^.+ and 2c ^.+ of 2,3,4,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.3.0]oct‐2‐ene and 2,3,3,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.3.0]octane‐2,4‐diyl, respectively. In CFCl₃ and CF₃CCl₃ matrices, 1d and 2d yielded analogous products, namely the radical cations 3d ^.+ and 2d ^.+ of 2,3,4,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.2.0]hept‐2‐ene and 2,3,3,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.2.0]heptane‐2,4‐diyl. The radical cations 3c ^.+ and 3d ^.+ and 2c ^.+ and 2d ^.+ correspond to their non‐annelated counterparts 3a ^.+ and 3b ^.+, and 2a ^.+ and 2b ^.+ generated previously under the same conditions from 2,3‐diazabicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐2‐ene ( 1a ) and bicyclo[2.1.0]pentane ( 2a ), as well as from their 1,4‐dimethyl derivatives ( 1b and 2b ). However, in a CF₂ClCFCl₂ matrix, both 1d and 2d gave the radical cation 4d ^.+ of 2,3,3,4‐tetramethylcyclohepta‐1,4‐diene. Starting from 1e and 2e , the radical cations 4e ^.+ and 4e′ ^.+ of the isomeric 1,2,7,7‐ and 1,6,7,7‐tetramethylcyclohepta‐1,3,5‐trienes appeared as the corresponding products, while 1f was converted into the radical cation 4f ^.+ of 1,5,6,6‐tetramethylcyclohexa‐1,4‐diene which readily lost a proton to yield the corresponding cyclohexadienyl radical 4f ^.. Reaction mechanisms leading to the pertinent radical cations are discussed.     

Chloro(η6‐p‐cymene)(phosphoramidite)ruthenium(II), a 16‐Electron Fragment Stabilized by an η2‐Aryl–Metal Interaction,and Its Use in Asymmetric Cyclopropanation

Chloride abstraction from the half‐sandwich complexes [RuCl₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(P*‐κP)] ( 2a : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1a = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl)]phosphoramidite; 2b : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1b = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐(1‐(1‐naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite) with (Et₃O)[PF₆] or Tl[PF₆] gives the cationic, 18‐electron complexes dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐phenyl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3a ) and [Ru(S)]‐dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐naphthalen‐1‐yl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐(naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3b ), which feature the η²‐coordination of one aryl substituent of the phosphoramidite ligand, as indicated by ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and ³¹P‐NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by an X‐ray study of 3b . Additionally, the dissociation of p‐cymene from 2a and 3a gives dichloro{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐(1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) ( 4a ) and di‐μ‐chlorobis{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}diruthenium(II) bis(hexafluorophosphate) ( 5a ), respectively, in which one phenyl group of the N‐substituents is η⁶‐coordinated to the Ru‐center. Complexes 3a and 3b catalyze the asymmetric cyclopropanation of α‐methylstyrene with ethyl diazoacetate with up to 86 and 87% ee for the cis‐ and the trans‐isomers, respectively.     

Formation of the Distinct Redox‐Interrelated Forms of Nitric Oxide from Reaction of Dinitrosyl Iron Complexes (DNICs) and Substitution Ligands

Release of the distinct NO redox‐interrelated forms (NO⁺, ^.NO, and HNO/NO^?), derived from reaction of the dinitrosyl iron complex (DNIC) [(NO)₂Fe(C₁₂H₈N)₂]^? ( 1 ) (C₁₂H₈N=carbazolate) and the substitution ligands (S₂CNMe₂)₂, [SC₆H₄‐o‐NHC(O)(C₅H₄N)]₂ ((PyPepS)₂), and P(C₆H₃‐3‐SiMe₃‐2‐SH)₃ ([P(SH)₃]), respectively, was demonstrated. In contrast to the reaction of (PyPepS)₂ and DNIC 1 in a 1:1 stoichiometry that induces the release of an NO radical and the formation of complex [PPN][Fe(PyPepS)₂] ( 4 ), the incoming substitution ligand (S₂CNMe₂)₂ triggered the transformation of DNIC 1 into complex [(NO)Fe(S₂CNMe₂)₂] ( 2 ) along with N‐nitrosocarbazole ( 3 ). The subsequent nitrosation of N‐acetylpenicillamine (NAP) by N‐nitrosocarbazole ( 3 ) to produce S‐nitroso‐N‐acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) may signify the possible formation pathway of S‐nitrosothiols from DNICs by means of transnitrosation of N‐nitrosamines. Protonation of DNIC 1 by [P(SH)₃] triggers the release of HNO and the generation of complex [PPN][Fe(NO)P(C₆H₃‐3‐SiMe₃‐2‐S)₃] ( 5 ). In a similar fashion, the nucleophilic attack of the chelating ligand P(C₆H₃‐3‐SiMe₃‐2‐SNa)₃ ([P(SNa)₃]) on DNIC 1 resulted in the direct release of [NO]^? captured by [(¹⁵NO)Fe(SPh)₃]^?, thus leading to [(¹⁵NO)(¹⁴NO)Fe(SPh)₂]^?. These results illustrate one aspect of how the incoming substitution ligands ((S₂CNMe₂)₂ vs. (PyPepS)₂ vs. [P(SH)₃]/[P(SNa)₃]) in cooperation with the carbazolate‐coordinated ligands of DNIC 1 function to control the release of NO⁺, ^.NO, or [NO]^? from DNIC 1 upon reaction of complex 1 and the substitution ligands. Also, these results signify that DNICs may act as an intermediary of NO in the redox signaling processes by providing the distinct redox‐interrelated forms of NO to interact with different NO‐responsive targets in biological systems.     

Asymmetric anionic polymerization of N‐1‐naphthylmaleimide with chiral ligand‐organometal complexes in toluene

Asymmetric anionic homopolymerizations of N‐1‐naphthylmaleimide (1‐NMI) were performed with chiral ligand/organometal complexes to form optically active polymers. Poly(1‐NMI)s obtained with methylene‐bridged bisoxazoline derivatives (Rbox)‐diethylzinc (Et₂Zn) complexes showed high specific optical rotations ([α]) from +152.3 to +191.4°. Circular dichroism spectra of the polymers exhibited a split Cotton effect in the UV absorption‐band region. According to the exciton chirality method, the absolute configuration of the polymer main chain was determined according to the following method: (+)‐poly[N‐substituted maleimides (RMI)] main chains can contain more (S,S)‐ than (R,R)‐configurations. (?)‐Poly(RMI) main chains can contain more (R,R)‐ than (S,S)‐configurations. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 39: 3556–3565, 2001     

Stereochemistry of the Methyl Group in (R)‐3‐Methylitaconate Derived by Rearrangement of 2‐Methylideneglutarate Catalysed by a Coenzyme B12‐Dependent Mutase

2‐Methylideneglutarate mutase is an adenosylcobalamin (coenzyme B₁₂)‐dependent enzyme that catalyses the equilibration of 2‐methylideneglutarate with (R)‐3‐methylitaconate. This reaction is believed to occur via protein‐bound free radicals derived from substrate and product. The stereochemistry of the formation of the methyl group of 3‐methylitaconate has been probed using a `chiral methyl group'. The methyl group in 3‐([²H₁,³H]methyl)itaconate derived from either (R)‐ or (S)‐2‐methylidene[3‐²H₁,3‐³H₁]glutarate was a 50 : 50 mixture of (R)‐ and (S)‐forms. It is concluded that the barrier to rotation about the C−C bond between the methylene radical centre and adjacent C‐atom in the product‐related radical [^.CH₂CH(⁻O₂CC=CH₂)CO₂⁻] is relatively low, and that the interaction of the radical with cob(II)alamin is minimal. Hence, cob(II)alamin is a spectator of the molecular rearrangement of the substrate radical to product radical.     

Tetrakis[(4S)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one]dirhodium(II) and Its Catalytic Applications for Metal Carbene Transformations

The synthesis and X-ray structure of the binuclear complex tetrakis[(4S)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one]-dirhodium(II) ([Rh₂{(4S)-phox}₄]) are reported. Structure-selectivity comparisons are made for typical metal carbene transformations, such as inter- and intramolecular cyclopropane formation, intermolecular cyclopropene formation and intramolecular C–H insertions of diazoacetates and diazoacetamides. The enantioselectivity achieved in the [Rh₂{(4S)-phox}₄]-catalyzed reactions is intermediate between that of [Rh₂{(5S)-mepy}₄] and [Rh₂{(4R)-bnox}₄], which were described previously (mepy = methyl 5-oxopyrrolidine-2-carboxylate; bnox = 4-benzyloxazolidin-2-one). In contrast to other catalyzed intermolecular cyclopropane formations, those using [Rh₂{(4S)-phox}₄] result preferentially in formation of the cis-cyclopropane.