Reactivity with Amines of Bis(cyanamide) and Bis(cyanoguanidine) Complexes of the Iron Triad

Treatment of bis(cyanamide) [M(N≡CNEt₂)₂L₄](BPh₄)₂ and bis(cyanoguanidine) [M{N≡CN(H)C(NH₂)=NH}₂L₄](BPh₄)₂ complexes [M = Fe, Ru, Os; L = P(OEt)₃] with an excess of amine RNH₂ (R = nPr, iPr) affords mixed‐ligand complexes with cyanamide and amine [M(NH₂R)(N≡CNEt₂)L₄](BPh₄)₂ ( 1a – 5a ) and [M(NH₂R){N≡CN(H)C(NH₂)=NH}L₄](BPh₄)₂ ( 1b , 2b ). The complexes were characterized by spectroscopy and X‐ray crystal structure determination of [M(NH₂iPr)(N≡CNEt₂){P(OEt)₃}₄](BPh₄)₂ [M = Ru ( 3a ), Os ( 5a )].     

[RhCl(CO)(PPh3)]2. A precursor for the synthesis of cationic rhodium complexes with nitrogen donor ligands

Summary The use of [RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)]₂ as a precursor for the synthesis of complexes of the types [Rh(CO)L₂(PPh₃)]A (A = [ClO₄]^– or [BPh₄]^–; L = pyridine type ligand) and [Rh(CO)(L-L)(PPh₃)]A (A = [ClO₄]^– or [BPh₄]^–; L-L = bidentate nitrogen donor) and the preparation of several complexes of the types [Rh(CO)L(PPh₃){P(p-RC₆H₄)₃}]BPh₄ and [Rh(CO)(phen)(PPh₃){P(p-RC₆H₄)₃}]A (A = [ClO₄]^– or [BPh₄]^–; R = H or Me) is described.Author to whom all correspondence should be directed.     

Ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes with N-[di(alkyl/aryl)carbamothioyl]benzamide derivatives and triphenylphosphine as effective catalysts for oxidation of alcohols

Ruthenium(II) complexes, [RuCl(L)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] {where L?=?N-[di(alkyl/aryl)carbamothioyl]benzamide derivatives}, are prepared from reaction between [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] and N-[di(alkyl/aryl)carbamothioyl]benzamide derivatives in toluene and characterized by elemental analysis and spectral data (electronic, infrared, ¹H NMR, and ³¹P NMR). The combination of [RuCl(L)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (0.01?mmol) and N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMO) (3?mmol) is an active catalyst for the oxidation of primary, secondary, cyclic, allylic, aliphatic, and benzylic alcohols to their corresponding aldehydes and ketones at room temperature. The oxidation protocol is simple to operate and gives the corresponding carbonyl compounds good to excellent yields.     

Synthesis,spectroscopic and structural characterizations of two new complexes of ruthenium with 2-(hydroxymethyl)benzimidazole and 1,10-phenanthroline ligands

The complexes [RuCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(HBIm)] and [RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂(1,10-phen)]Cl·H₂O·(CH₃)₂O have been prepared and studied by IR and UV–Vis spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography. The complexes were prepared in the reactions of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 2-(hydroxymethyl)benzimidazole or 1,10-phenanthroline two hydrate in acetone. The electronic spectra of the obtained compounds have been calculated using the TDDFT method. The luminescence properties of these complexes were examined.     

Thiosemicarbazone Complexes of Ruthenium(II) and Rhodium(I) Containing Triphenylphosphine

Several new hexa-coordinated ruthenium(II) and penta-coordinated rhodium(I) complexes of the types [RuCl(CO)(PPh ₃ ) ₂ (TSC)], [RuH(CO)(PPh ₃ ) ₂ (TSC)], and [Rh(PPh ₃ ) ₃ (TSC)] (where TSC = anion of thiosemicarbazone Schiff bases) have been prepared by the reactions of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh ₃ ) ₃ ], [RuH ₂ (CO)(PPh ₃ ) ₃ )], and [RhH(PPh ₃ ) ₄ ] with thiosemicarbazones of 2-furaldehyde (H-FTSC), thiophene-2-carboxaldehyde (H-TCTSC), p-anisaldehyde (H-ATSC), piperonaldehyde (H-PTSC), and cyclohexanone (H-CTSC). All the new complexes obtained have been characterized on the basis of elemental analysis, IR, ¹ H NMR, ³¹ P NMR, and electronic spectral data.     

Synthesis, crystal, molecular and electronic structures of hydride carbonyl ruthenium(II) complexes with pyridine and its derivative ligands

[RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(py)], [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(pyIm)] and [RuCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(pyoh)]·2CH₃OH complexes (where py = pyridine, pyIm = imidazo[1,2-α]pyridine, pyoh = 2-hydroxy-6-methylpyridine) have been prepared and studied by IR, NMR, UV-Vis spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Electronic structures and bonding of the complexes were defined on the basis of DFT method, and the pyridine derivative ligands were compared on the basis of their donor-acceptor properties. Values of the ligand field parameter 10Dq and Racah’s parameters were estimated for the studied compounds, and the luminescence properties were determined.     

Platinum,iridium and rhodium complexes with substituted bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane ligands Ph2PCH(R)PPh2 (R = Me,Ph or SiMe3)

Substituted phosphines of the type Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂ and their Pt^II complexes [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂}] (R = Me, Ph or SiMe₃; X = halide) were prepared. Treatment of [PtCl₂(NCBu^t)₂] with Ph₂PCH(SiMe₃)-PPh₂ gave [PtCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], while treatment with Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂. Reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi or PhC≡CLi with [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] gave [Pt(C≡CC₆H₄Me-p)₂-{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] (X = I) and [Pt{Ph₂PC(Me)PPh₂}₂](X = Cl),while reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi with [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PC(Ph)PPh₂}₂]. The platinum complexes [PtMe₂(dpmMe)] or [Pt(CH₂)₄(dpmMe)] fail to undergo ring-opening on treatment with one equivalent of dpmMe [dpmMe = Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂]. Treatment of [Ir(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂] with two equivalents of dpmMe gave [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. The PF₆ salt was also prepared. Treatment of [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl with [Cu(C≡CPh)₂], [AgCl(PPh₃)] or [AuCl(PPh₃)] failed to give heterobimetallic complexes. Attempts to prepare the dinuclear rhodium complex [Rh₂(CO)₃(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ using a procedure similar to that employed for an analogous dpm (dpm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) complex were unsuccessful. Instead, the mononuclear complex [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ was obtained. The corresponding chloride and PF₆ salts were also prepared. Attempts to prepare [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl in CHCl₃ gave [RhHCl(dpmMe)₂]Cl. Recrystallization of [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ from CHCl₃/EtOH gave [RhO₂(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄. Treatment of [Rh(CO)₂Cl₂]₂ with one equivalent of dpmMe per Rh atom gave two compounds, [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and a dinuclear complex that undergoes exchange at room temperature between two formulae: [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ-Cl)(μ-CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and [Rh₂(CO)₂-(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The reactions between [RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)3] and quinoline carboxylic acids

The reactions of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 8-hydroxy-2-methyl-quinoline-7-carboxylic acid and quinoline-2-carboxylic acid have been examined, and two novel ruthenium(II) complexes – [(PPh₃)₂RuH(CO)(C₁₀H₈NO₃)] and [(PPh₃)₂RuCl(CO)(C₉H₆O₂)] – have been obtained. The compounds have been studied by IR and UV–Vis spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography. The molecular orbital diagrams of the complexes have been calculated with the density functional theory (DFT) method. The spin-allowed singlet–singlet electronic transitions of the compounds have been calculated with the time-dependent DFT method, and the UV–Vis spectra of the compounds have been discussed on this basis.     

Spectroscopic characterization and electrochemical studies of ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes containing bidentate Schiff bases and triphenylphosphine or a nitrogen heterocycle

Reactions of ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes of the type [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(B)] [B?=?PPh₃, pyridine (py), piperidine (pip) or morpholine (mor)] with bidentate Schiff base ligands derived from the condensation of 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde with aniline, o-, m- or p-toluidine in a 1?:?1 mol ratio in benzene resulted in the formation of complexes formulated as [RuCl(CO)(L)(PPh₃)(B)] [L?=?bidentate Schiff base anion, B?=?PPh₃, py, pip, mor]. The complexes were characterized by analyses, IR, electronic and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetric studies. In all cases, the Schiff bases replace one molecule of phosphine and a hydride ion from the starting complexes, indicating that Ru–N bonds in the complexes containing heterocyclic nitrogenous bases are stronger than the Ru–P bond to PPh₃. Octahedral geometry is proposed for the complexes.     

Ruthenium(II) complexes containing bidentate Schiff bases and their antifungal activity

The reactions of ruthenium(II) complexes, [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(B)] [B = PPh₃, pyridine (py) or piperidine (pip)], with bidentate Schiff base ligands derived by condensing salicylaldehyde with aniline, o-, m- or p-toluidine have been carried out. The products were characterised by analytical, i.r., electronic, ¹H-n.m.r. and ³¹P-n.m.r. spectral studies and are formulated as [RuCl(CO)(L)(PPh₃)(B)] (L = Schiff base anion; B = PPh₃, py or pip). An octahedral structure has been tentatively proposed for the new complexes. The Schiff bases and the new complexes were tested in vitro to evaluate their activity against the fungus Aspergillus flavus.     

THE REACTIONS OF [MoCl(GeCl3)(CO)3(NCMe)2] WITH NEUTRAL BI- AND TERDENTATE DONOR LIGANDS

Abstract

The reaction of [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₃(NCMe)₂] with an equimolar quantity of L?L {L?L = 2,2′-bipy, 1,10-phen, Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂ (n = 1 or 2)} in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature gave either [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₃(L?L)] (L?L = 2,2′-bipy or 1,10-phen) (1 and 2) or [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂ (NCMe)(L?L)]{L?L = Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂ (n = 1 or 2) (3 or 4), respectively. Equimolar quantities of [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂(NCMe){Ph₂P(CH₂)PPh₂}] (3) and L?L {L?L = 2,2′-bipy or Ph₂P(CH)₂PPh₂} react in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature to afford the cationic complexes [Mo(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{Ph₂P(CH₂) PPh₂}(L?L)]Cl (5 and 6) in good yield. The cationic nature of 6 was established by chloride exchange by reacting Na[BPh₄] with 6 in acetonitrile to give the tetraphenylborate complex [Mo(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{Ph₂P(CH₂)PPh₂}₂][BPh₄] (7). Reaction of equimolar quantities of [MoCl(GeCl₃) (CO)₃(NCMe)₂] and PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂ in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature afforded the dicarbonyl complex [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂}] (8) in good yield.     

Synthesis,characterization and catalytic studies of ruthenium(II) chalconate complexes

Stable ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes of the type [RuCl(CO)(EPh₃)(B)(L)] (E = P or As; B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or Py; L = 2′‐hydroxychalcones) were synthesized from the reaction of [RuHCl(CO)(EPh₃)₂(B)] (E = P or As; B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or Py) with 2′‐hydroxychalcones in benzene under reflux. The new complexes were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic (IR, electronic ¹H, ³¹P and ¹³C NMR) data. They were assigned an octahedral structure. The complexes exhibited catalytic activity for the oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols into their corresponding aldehydes and ketones in the presence of N‐methylmorpholine‐N‐oxide (NMO) as co‐oxidant and were also found to be efficient transfer hydrogenation catalysts. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis of [TpRu(CO)(PPh3)]2(μ-CHCHCHCHC6H4CHCHCHCH) from Wittig reactions

Treatment of [Ru(CHCHCH₂PPh₃)X(CO)(PPh₃)₂]⁺ (X=Cl, Br) with KTp (Tp=hydridotris(pyrazolyl)borate) and NaBPh₄ produced [TpRu(CHCHCH₂PPh₃)(CO)(PPh₃)]BPh₄. Reaction of RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃ with HCCCH(OEt)₂ produced Ru(CHCHCH(OEt)₂)Cl(CO)(PPh₃)₂, which reacted with KTp to give TpRu(CHCHCHO)(CO)(PPh₃). Treatment of [TpRu(CHCHCH₂PPh₃)(CO)(PPh₃)]BPh₄ with NaN(SiMe₃)₂ and benzaldehyde produced TpRu(CHCHCHCHPh)(CO)(PPh₃). The later complex was also produced when TpRu(CHCHCHO)(CO)(PPh₃) was treated with PhCH₂PPh₃Cl/NaN(SiMe₃)₂. The bimetallic complex [TpRu(CO)(PPh₃)]₂(μ-CHCHCHCHC₆H₄CHCHCHCH) was obtained from the reaction of [TpRu(CHCHCH₂PPh₃)(CO)(PPh₃)]BPh₄ with NaN(SiMe₃)₂ and terephthaldicarboxaldehyde.     

Metallkomplexe mit biologisch wichtigen Liganden. LXXXII. Triphenylphosphan-Molybdän-, Wolfram-, Ruthenium- und Iridium-Komplexe mit N-acylierten α-Aminocarboxylaten

Metal Complexes of Biological Important Ligands. LXXXII. Triphenylphosphine Molybdenum, Tungsten, Ruthenium, and Iridium Complexes of N-Acyl-α-Aminocarboxylates The reactions of the hydrido complexes RuHCl(CO) · (PPh₃)₃, RuH₂(PPh₃)₄ and IrH₃(PPh₃)₃ with N-acyl-α-aminocarboxylates give the carboxylate complexes RuCl(O₂CCHRNHCOR′)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ ( 1–3 ), RuH(O₂CCHRNHCOR′)(PPh₃)₃ ( 4–6 ) and IrH₂(O₂CCH₂NHCOPh)(PPh₃)₃ ( 7 ). The structure of RuCl · (O₂CCHNHCOPh)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ ( 1 ) has been determined by x-ray diffraction. The triphenylphosphine complexes MBr · (O₂CCH₂NHCOR)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ (M = Mo, W) ( 8–12 ) and Mo(O₂CCHRNHCOR′)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ ( 13–17 ) are formed from MBr₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ (M = Mo, W) with one or two equivalents of N-acyl-a-aminoacidates, respectively.     

Carbonylation of alkenyl-complexes of ruthenium. The formation of complexes containing,alkene or acyl ligands,and the reaction of the acyl complexes with methanol

The unsaturated complexes RuCl(CO)(RC=CHR′)(PPh₃)₂ react with CO to give the dicarbonyl complexes RuCl(CO)₂(RC=CHR′)(PPh₃)₂ or the η²-acyl complexes RuCl(CO)(O=CC(R)=CHR′)(PPh₃)₂, depending on the R and R′ groups. The RuCl(CO)(O=CC(Me)=CHMe)(PPh₃)₂ complex reacts with methanol to give RuCl(CO)(O₂CC(Me)=CHMe)(PPh₃)₂, which structure has been established by an X-ray diffraction study.     

Novel P‐Stereogenic PCP Pincer‐Aryl Ruthenium(II) Complexes and Their Use in the Asymmetric Hydrogen Transfer Reaction of Acetophenone

Achiral P‐donor pincer‐aryl ruthenium complexes ([RuCl(PCP)(PPh₃)]) 4c , d were synthesized via transcyclometalation reactions by mixing equivalent amounts of [1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[diisopropylphosphine] ( 2c ) or [1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[diphenylphosphine] ( 2d ) and the N‐donor pincer‐aryl complex [RuCl{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}(PPh₃)], ( 3 ; Scheme 2). The same synthetic procedure was successfully applied for the preparation of novel chiral P‐donor pincer‐aryl ruthenium complexes [RuCl(P*CP*)(PPh₃)] 4a , b by reacting P‐stereogenic pincer‐arenes (S,S)‐[1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[(alkyl)(phenyl)phosphines] 2a , b (alkyl=ⁱPr or ^tBu, P*CHP*) and the complex [RuCl{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}(PPh₃)], ( 3 ; Scheme 3). The crystal structures of achiral [RuCl(equation/tex2gif-sup-3.gifPCP)(PPh₃)] 4c and of chiral (S,S)‐[RuCl(equation/tex2gif-sup-6.gifPCP)(PPh₃)] 4a were determined by X‐ray diffraction (Fig. 3). Achiral [RuCl(PCP)(PPh₃)] complexes and chiral [RuCl(P*CP*)(PPh₃)] complexes were tested as catalyst in the H‐transfer reduction of acetophenone with propan‐2‐ol. With the chiral complexes, a modest enantioselectivity was obtained.     

Propionyl complexes of ruthenium derived from the reaction of ethylene with RuHCl(CO)2(PPh3)2

RuHCl(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ reacts with ethylene under mild conditions (25 psi, 80°C) to yield a propionyl derivative RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ which is believed to be coordinatively unsaturated. Unlike the acetyl analogue, RuCl[C[O]C₂H₅(CO)-(PPh₃)₂ does not isomerize to RuCl(C₂H₅)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ in solution. Under one atmosphere of carbon monoxide, RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅(CO)(PPh₃)₂ exists in equilibrium with two species believed to be RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ and [Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂]Cl. RuCl(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ reacts with CO/ AgClO₄ to give mer-[Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂]ClO₄, p-tolylisocyanide (RNC) and NaClO₄ to give cis-[Ru(C[O]C₂H₅)(CO)(CNR)₂(PPh₃)₂ClO₄, and hydrochloric acid to yield the hydroxycarbene complex, RuCl₂(CO)(C[OH]C₂H₅)(PPh₃)₂.     

Spectral,catalytic, and antifungal studies of ruthenium(II) chalcone complexes

Reactions of [RuHCl(CO)(B)(EPh₃)₂] (B = EPh₃ or Py; E = P or As) and chalcones in benzene with equal molar ratio led to the formation of new complexes of the type [RuCl(CO)(EPh₃)(B)(L^1?4)] (B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or Py; E = P or As; L = chalcone). The new complexes have been characterized by analytical and spectroscopic (IR-, electronic, ¹H-, ³¹P-, and ¹³C-NMR) data. Based on these data, an octahedral structure has been assigned for all the complexes. The chalcones are monobasic bidentate (O,O) donors and coordinate to ruthenium via phenolic and carbonyl oxygen. The new complexes exhibit efficient catalytic activity for the transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds. Antifungal properties of the ligands and their complexes have been examined and compared with standard Bavistin.     

Ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes containing tridentate Schiff bases

New ruthenium(II) complexes, [Ru(CO)(B)(LL)(PPh₃)] (where, LL = tridentate Schiff bases; B = PPh₃, pyridine, piperidine or morpholine) have been prepared by reacting [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] or [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(B)] with Schiff bases containing donor groups (O, N, X) viz., salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (X = S), salicylaldehyde semicarbazone (X = O), o-hydroxyacetophenone thiosemicarbazone (X = S) and o-hydroxyacetophenone semicarbazone (X = O). The new complexes were characterised by elemental analysis, spectral (i.r., ¹H- and ³¹P-n.m.r.), data.     

Syntheses,characterization, and crystal structures of ruthenium(II)/(III) complexes with tridentate salicylaldiminato ligands

Treatment of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with one equivalent of tridentate Schiff base 2-[(2-dimethylamino-ethylimino)-methyl]-phenol (HL) in the presence of triethylamine afforded a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₃(κ²-N,N-NH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂)(PPh₃)] as a result of decomposition of HL. Interaction of HL and one equivalent of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃], [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂] or [Ru(tht)₄Cl₂] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) under different conditions led to isolation of the corresponding ruthenium(II) complexes [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)(PPh₃)] (2), [RuCl(κ³-N,N,O-L)(CO)₂] (3), and a ruthenium(III) complex [RuCl₂(κ³-N,N,O-L)(tht)] (4), respectively. Molecular structures of 1·CH₂Cl₂, 2·CH₂Cl₂, 3 and 4 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.