Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Thermal Behavior of a Novel Insensitive Energetic Cocrystal Composed of 3,3′‐Bis(1,2,4‐oxadiazole)‐5,5′‐dione and 4‐Amino‐1,2,4‐triazole

A novel insensitive energetic cocrystal consisting of 3,3′‐bis(1,2,4‐oxadiazole)‐5,5′‐dione and 4‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole in a 1:2 molar ratio was prepared and characterized. The structure of this cocrystal was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal structure of the cocrystal is a monoclinic system with P1 space group. Properties of the cocrystal studied included thermal decomposition and detonation performance. This cocrystal has a crystal density of 1.689 g · cm^–3 at 173 K and good detonation performance (D = 6940 m · s^–1, P = 20.9 GPa). Moreover, measured impact and friction sensitivities (IS > 40 J, FS > 360 N) show that it can be classified as an insensitive energetic material. Its thermodynamic properties indicate that it has moderate thermal stability with a sharp exothermic peak (244 °C, 5 K · min^–1) and a high critical temperature of thermal explosion (523 K). In view of the observations above, it may serve as a promising alternative to known explosives such as TNT.     

Three cocrystals and a cocrystal salt of pyrimidin‐2‐amine and glutaric acid

Four new cocrystals of pyrimidin‐2‐amine and propane‐1,3‐dicarboxylic (glutaric) acid were crystallized from three different solvents (acetonitrile, methanol and a 50:50 wt% mixture of methanol and chloroform) and their crystal structures determined. Two of the cocrystals, namely pyrimidin‐2‐amine–glutaric acid (1/1), C₄H₅N₃·C₆H₈O₄, (I) and (II), are polymorphs. The glutaric acid molecule in (I) has a linear conformation, whereas it is twisted in (II). The pyrimidin‐2‐amine–glutaric acid (2/1) cocrystal, 2C₄H₅N₃·C₆H₈O₄, (III), contains glutaric acid in its linear form. Cocrystal–salt bis(2‐aminopyrimidinium) glutarate–glutaric acid (1/2), 2C₄H₆N₃⁺·C₆H₆O₄²⁻·2C₆H₈O₄, (IV), was crystallized from the same solvent as cocrystal (II), supporting the idea of a cocrystal–salt continuum when both the neutral and ionic forms are present in appreciable concentrations in solution. The diversity of the packing motifs in (I)–(IV) is mainly caused by the conformational flexibility of glutaric acid, while the hydrogen‐bond patterns show certain similarities in all four structures.     

Crystal structure of pharmaceutical cocrystals of 2,6‐diaminopyridine with piracetam and theophylline

Pharmaceutical cocrystals are crystalline solids formed by an active pharmaceutical ingredient and a cocrystal former. The cocrystals 2,6‐diaminopyridine (DAP)–piracetam [PIR; systematic name: 2‐(2‐oxopyrrolidin‐1‐yl)acetamide] (1/1), C₅H₇N₃·C₆H₁₀N₂O₂, (I), and 2,6‐diaminopyridine–theophylline (TEO; systematic name: 1,3‐dimethyl‐7H‐purine‐2,6‐dione) (1/1), C₅H₇N₃·C₇H₈N₄O₂, (II), were prepared by the solvent‐assisted grinding method and were characterized by IR spectroscopy and powder X‐ray diffraction. Cocrystal (I) crystallized in the orthorhombic space group Pbca and showed a 1:1 stoichiometry. The DAP and PIR molecules are linked by an N—H…O hydrogen‐bond interaction. Self‐assembly of PIR molecules forms a sheet of C (4) and C (7) chains. Cocrystal (II) crystallized in the monoclinic P 2₁/c space group and also showed a 1:1 stoichiometry. The DAP and TEO molecules are connected by N—H…N and N—H…O hydrogen bonds, forming an R ₂²(9) heterosynthon. A bidimensional supramolecular array is formed by interlinked DAP–TEO tetramers, producing a two‐dimensional sheet.     

Nitrogen‐Rich Energetic Dianionic Salts of 3, 4‐Bis(1H‐5‐­tetrazolyl)furoxan with Excellent Thermal Stability

Nitrogen‐rich 3, 4‐bis(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)furoxan (H₂BTF, 2 ) and its energetic salts with excellent thermal stability were successfully synthesized and fully characterized by ¹H, and ¹³C NMR, and IR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and elemental analyses. Additionally, the structures of barium ( 3 ) and 1‐methyl‐3, 4, 5‐triamino‐triazolium ( 10 ) salts were confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The densities of the energetic salts paired with organic cations range between 1.56 and 1.85 g · cm^–3 as measured by a gas pycnometer. Based on the measured densities and calculated heats of formation, the detonation pressures and velocities are calculated to be in the range 23.4–32.0 GPa and 7939–8915 m · s^–1, which make them competitive energetic materials.     

Cocrystals of 1,4‐diethynylbenzene with 1,3‐diacetylbenzene and benzene‐1,4‐dicarbaldehyde exhibiting strong nonconventional alkyne–carbonyl C—H…O hydrogen bonds between the components

Weak interactions between organic molecules are important in solid‐state structures where the sum of the weaker interactions support the overall three‐dimensional crystal structure. The sp‐C—H…N hydrogen‐bonding interaction is strong enough to promote the deliberate cocrystallization of a series of diynes with a series of dipyridines. It is also possible that a similar series of cocrystals could be formed between molecules containing a terminal alkyne and molecules which contain carbonyl O atoms as the potential hydrogen‐bond acceptor. I now report the crystal structure of two cocrystals that support this hypothesis. The 1:1 cocrystal of 1,4‐diethynylbenzene with 1,3‐diacetylbenzene, C₁₀H₆·C₁₀H₁₀O₂, (1), and the 1:1 cocrystal of 1,4‐diethynylbenzene with benzene‐1,4‐dicarbaldehyde, C₁₀H₆·C₈H₆O₂, (2), are presented. In both cocrystals, a strong nonconventional ethynyl–carbonyl sp‐C—H…O hydrogen bond is observed between the components. In cocrystal (1), the C—H…O hydrogen‐bond angle is 171.8 (16)° and the H…O and C…O hydrogen‐bond distances are 2.200 (19) and 3.139 (2) Å, respectively. In cocrystal (2), the C—H…O hydrogen‐bond angle is 172.5 (16)° and the H…O and C…O hydrogen‐bond distances are 2.25 (2) and 3.203 (2) Å, respectively.     

Preparation,Crystal Structure,and Thermal Analysis of Two Energetic Salts Based on Nitro Phenolic Compounds with Diamino‐glyoxine

As a key research objective for environmentally friendly energetic materials, energetic salts without heavy metal have received wide attention. The energetic salts DAG · PA · H₂O ( 1 ) and DAG · TNR · H₂O ( 2 ) were synthesized by using diamino‐glyoxine (DAG) and picric acid (PA) or 2, 4,6‐trinitro‐resorcinol (TNR) as raw materials, and their structures were characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. Single crystals of the title salts were cultured and their structures were determined by X‐ray single‐crystal diffraction. Both salts belong to the triclinic space group P1 with density values of 1.764 and 1.751 g · cm^–3, respectively. The thermal decomposition behaviors of both salts were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), the non‐isothermal kinetic parameters and the critical temperature of thermal explosion were calculated. The heats of formation for the salts were also determined through the combustion heats date measured by using the oxygen bomb calorimetry. In addition, the detonation pressure (P) and detonation velocities (D) of the salts were predicted by using the K‐J equations, and their sensitivities towards impact and friction were tested. The results indicated that the title salts have potential applications in the field of energetic materials.     

6‐Propyl‐2‐thiouracil versus 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil: enhancing the hydrogen‐bonded synthon motif by replacement of a methylene group with an O atom

The understanding of intermolecular interactions is a key objective of crystal engineering in order to exploit the derived knowledge for the rational design of new molecular solids with tailored physical and chemical properties. The tools and theories of crystal engineering are indispensable for the rational design of (pharmaceutical) cocrystals. The results of cocrystallization experiments of the antithyroid drug 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil (PTU) with 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine (DAPY), and of 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil (MOMTU) with DAPY and 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidine (TAPY), respectively, are reported. PTU and MOMTU show a high structural similarity and differ only in the replacement of a methylene group (–CH₂–) with an O atom in the side chain, thus introducing an additional hydrogen‐bond acceptor in MOMTU. Both molecules contain an ADA hydrogen‐bonding site (A = acceptor and D = donor), while the coformers DAPY and TAPY both show complementary DAD sites and therefore should be capable of forming a mixed ADA/DAD synthon with each other, i.e. N—H…O, N—H…N and N—H…S hydrogen bonds. The experiments yielded one solvated cocrystal salt of PTU with DAPY, four different solvates of MOMTU, one ionic cocrystal of MOMTU with DAPY and one cocrystal salt of MOMTU with TAPY, namely 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracilate–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–N,N‐dimethylacetamide–water (1/1/1/1) (the systematic name for 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracilate is 6‐oxo‐4‐propyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₇H₉N₂OS⁻·C₄H₆N₄·C₄H₉NO·H₂O, (I), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₃H₇NO, (II), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₄H₉NO, (III), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–dimethyl sulfoxide (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₂H₆OS, (IV), 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil–1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₆H₈N₂O₂S·C₅H₉NO, (V), 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate (the systematic name for 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate is 4‐methoxymethyl‐6‐oxo‐2‐sulfanylidene‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₆H₇N₂O₂S⁻, (VI), and 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidinium 6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracilate–6‐methoxymethyl‐2‐thiouracil (1/1), C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₆H₇N₂O₂S⁻·C₆H₈N₂O₂S, (VII). Whereas in (I) only an AA/DD hydrogen‐bonding interaction was formed, the structures of (VI) and (VII) both display the desired ADA/DAD synthon. Conformational studies on the side chains of PTU and MOMTU also revealed a significant deviation for cocrystals (VI) and (VII), leading to the desired enhancement of the hydrogen‐bond pattern within the crystal.     

Synthesis and Characteristics of Bis(2, 2‐dinitroethyl‐N‐nitro)ethylenediamine‐Based Energetic Salts

New energetic bis(2, 2‐dinitroethyl‐N‐nitro)ethylenediamine‐based salts exhibiting moderate physical properties, good detonation properties, and relatively low impact sensitivities were synthesized in high yield by direct reactions of bis(2, 2‐dinitroethyl‐N‐nitro)ethylenediamine with organic bases. The resulting salts were fully characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (¹H and ¹³C), vibrational spectroscopy (IR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and elemental analysis. Solid‐state ¹⁵N NMR spectroscopy was used as an effective technique to further determine the structure of some products. Thermal decomposition kinetics and several thermodynamic parameters of some salts were obtained under non‐isothermal conditions by DSC. The densities of the energetic salts paired with organic cations were in the range 1.60–1.89 g · cm^–3 as measured with a gas pycnometer. Based on the measured densities and calculated heats of formation, detonation pressures and velocities were calculated using Explo 5.05 and found to be 23.6–44.8 GPa and 7790–9583 m · s^–1, respectively, which make them potentially useful as energetic materials.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Characterization of 3, 4′‐Bis‐1H‐1, 2,4‐triazolium Picrate Salt: A New High‐Energy Density Material

The environmentally friendly high‐energy density salt (TRTR)(PA) (TRTR = 3, 4′‐bis‐1, 2,4‐1H‐triazole, PA = 2, 4,6‐trinitrophenol, picric acid) was synthesized and characterized. The X‐ray single crystal diffraction results illustrate that the structure of title salt belongs to the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c. Many parallel relationships exist in the molecule, as well as a strong intramolecular π–π stacking interaction. The DSC result shows only one exothermal decomposition step at 229.1 °C. The TG‐DTG curve demonstrates a 75.9 % mass loss from 180 °C to 300 °C at a rate of 3.01 % · K^–1. Experimental data show that the combustion heat approximately equals to TNT (–15.22 MJ · kg^–1) and the enthalpy of formation is +332.2 kJ · mol^–1. Non–isothermal kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were obtained by two methods (Kissinger and Ozawa). Detonation pressure and velocity were calculated to be 23.4 GPa and 7.32 km · s^–1, respectively. Additionally, the sensitivities towards impact and friction were assessed with relevant standard methods.     

Synthesis and Properties of [Ba(CHZ)(BT)(H2O)2]n as a New Energetic Coordination Compound

In order to enhance the thermal stability of the barium salt of 5,5′‐bistetrazole (H₂BT), carbohydrazide (CHZ) was used to build [Ba(CHZ)(BT)(H₂O)₂]_n as a new energetic coordination compound by using a simple aqueous solution method. It was characterized by FT‐IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystal belongs to the monoclinic P2₁/c space group [a = 8.6827(18) Å, b = 17.945(4) Å, c = 7.2525 Å, β = 94.395(2)°, V = 1126.7(4) ų, and ρ = 2.356 g · cm^–3]. The Ba^II cation is ten‐coordinated with one BT^2–, two shared carbohydrazides, and four shared water molecules. The thermal stabilities were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal gravity analysis (TGA). The dehyration temperature (T_dehydro) is at 187 °C, whereas the decomposition temperature (T_d) is 432 °C. Non‐isothermal reaction kinetics parameters were calculated by Kissinger's method and Ozawa's method to work out E_K = 155.2 kJ · mol^–1, lgA_K = 9.25, and E_O = 158.8 kJ · mol^–1. The values of thermodynamic parameters, the peak temperature (while β → 0) (T_p0 = 674.85 K), the critical temperature of thermal explosion (T_b = 700.5 K), the free energy of activation (ΔG^≠ = 194.6 kJ · mol^–1), the entropy of activation (ΔS^≠ = –66.7 J · mol^–1), and the enthalpy of activation (ΔH^≠ = 149.6 kJ · mol^–1) were obtained. Additionally, the enthalpy of formation was calculated with density functional theory (DFT), obtaining Δ_fH°₂₉₈ ≈ 1962.6 kJ · mol^–1. Finally, the sensitivities toward impact and friction were assessed according to relevant methods. The result indicates the compound as an insensitive energetic material.     

Cocrystals of 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil: presence of the acceptor–donor–acceptor/donor–acceptor–donor synthon

The results of seven cocrystallization experiments of the antithyroid drug 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil (MTU), C₅H₆N₂OS, with 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine, 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidine and 6‐amino‐3H‐isocytosine (viz. 2,6‐diamino‐3H‐pyrimidin‐4‐one) are reported. MTU features an ADA (A = acceptor and D = donor) hydrogen‐bonding site, while the three coformers show complementary DAD hydrogen‐bonding sites and therefore should be capable of forming an ADA/DAD N—H...O/N—H...N/N—H...S synthon with MTU. The experiments yielded one cocrystal and six cocrystal solvates, namely 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1/2), C₅H₆N₂OS·C₄H₆N₄·2C₅H₉NO, (I), 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine (1/1), C₅H₆N₂OS·C₄H₆N₄, (II), 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (2/1/2), 2C₅H₆N₂OS·C₄H₆N₄·2C₄H₉NO, (III), 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–N,N‐dimethylformamide (2/1/2), C₅H₆N₂OS·0.5C₄H₆N₄·C₃H₇NO, (IV), 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidinium 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracilate–6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/1/2), C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₅H₅N₂OS⁻·C₅H₆N₂OS·2C₃H₇NO, (V), 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–6‐amino‐3H‐isocytosine–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/1/1), C₅H₆N₂OS·C₄H₆N₄O·C₃H₇NO, (VI), and 6‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–6‐amino‐3H‐isocytosine–dimethyl sulfoxide (1/1/1), C₅H₆N₂OS·C₄H₆N₄O·C₂H₆OS, (VII). Whereas in cocrystal (I) an R₂²(8) interaction similar to the Watson–Crick adenine/uracil base pair is formed and a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network is observed, the cocrystals (II)–(VII) contain the triply hydrogen‐bonded ADA/DAD N—H...O/N—H...N/N—H...S synthon and show a one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network. Although 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine possesses only one DAD hydrogen‐bonding site, it is, due to orientational disorder, triply connected to two MTU molecules in (III) and (IV).     

Synthesis and Properties of [Cd(HTRTR)2(H2O)4](HTNR)2 as an Energetic Complex

The energetic complex, [Cd(HTRTR)₂(H₂O)₄](HTNR)₂ {HTRTR = 4‐[3‐(1,2,4‐triazol‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triaozle; HTNR^– = styphnic acid anion) was synthesized and characterized by FT‐IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. It crystallizes triclinic in space group P$\bar{1}$ [a = 8.156(2) Å, b = 8.374(2) Å, c = 13.267(4) Å, α = 84.925(11)°, β = 87.016(11)°, γ = 63.683(5)°, V = 808.9(4) ų, ρ = 1.940 g · cm^–3]. The Cd^II ion is six‐coordinate with two HTRTRs and four water molecules. The thermal stabilities were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Non‐isothermal reaction kinetic parameters were calculated by Kissinger's and Ozawa‐Doyle's methods to obtain E_K = 144.0 kJ · mol^–1, lgA_K = 14.22, and E_O = 144.3 kJ · mol^–1. The values of thermodynamic parameters, the peak temperature while β→0 (T_p0), free energy of activation (ΔG^≠), entropy of activation (ΔS^≠), and enthalpy of activation (ΔH^≠) were obtained. Additionally, the enthalpy of formation was calculated by Hess's law on the basis of the experimental constant‐volume heat of combustion measured by bomb calorimetry, obtaining Δ_fH°₂₉₈ = 4985.5 kJ · mol^–1. Finally, the sensitivities toward impact and friction were assessed according to relevant methods. The result indicates it as an insensitive energetic material.     

Energetic N,N′‐Ethylene‐Bridged Bis(nitropyrazoles): Diversified Functionalities and Properties

A new class of N,N′‐ethylene‐bridged bis(nitropyrazoles) was synthesized and fully characterized. The highly efficient formation of the N,N′‐ethylene bridge was accomplished using dibromoethane and ammonium or potassium pyrazolate. Further functional‐group transformations of diaminobis(pyrazole) and dichlorobis(pyrazole) gave rise to diversified derivatives, including dinitramino‐, diazido‐ and hexanitrobis(pyrazole). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffractions were obtained for hexanitro and diazido derivatives to illustrate the structural characteristics. Heats of formation and detonation performance were calculated by using Gaussian 03 and EXPLO5 v6.01 programs, respectively. Because of the different functionalized groups, the impact and friction sensitivities of these new compounds range from insensitive to sensitive. Among them, the hexanitro derivative displays the most promising overall energetic properties (density (ρ)=1.84 g cm^?3; decomposition temperature (T_d)=250 °C; detonation pressure (P)=34.1 GPa; detonation velocity (v_D)=8759 m s^?1; impact sensitivity (IS)=25 J; friction sensitivity (FS)=160 N), which is competitive with those of 1,3,5‐trinitrotriazacyclohexane (ρ=1.80 g cm^?3; T_d=205 °C; P=35.0 GPa; v_D=8762 m s^?1; IS=7 J; FS=120 N).     

Temperature‐induced pseudopolymorphism of molecular salts from a pyridyl bis‐urea macrocycle and naphthalene‐1,5‐disulfonic acid

Molecular salts, often observed as cocrystals, play an important role in the fields of pharmaceutics and materials science, where salt formation is used to tune the properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and improve the stability of solid‐state materials. Salt formation via a proton‐transfer reaction typically alters hydrogen‐bonding motifs and influences supramolecular assembly patterns. We report here the molecular salts formed by the pyridyl bis‐urea macrocycle 3,5,13,15,21,22‐hexaazatricyclo[15.3.1.1^7,11]docosa‐1(21),7(22),8,10,17,19‐hexaene‐4,14‐dione, ( 1 ), and naphthalene‐1,5‐disulfonic acid (H₂NDS) as two salt cocrystal solvates, namely 4,14‐dioxo‐3,5,13,15,21,22‐hexaazatricyclo[15.3.1.1^7,11]docosa‐1(21),7(22),8,10,17,19‐hexaene‐21,22‐diium naphthalene‐1,5‐disulfonate dimethyl sulfoxide disolvate, C₁₆H₂₀N₆O₂²⁺·C₁₀H₆O₆S₂²⁻·2C₂H₆OS, ( 2 ), and the corresponding monosolvate, C₁₆H₂₀N₆O₂²⁺·C₁₀H₆O₆S₂²⁻·C₂H₆OS, ( 3 ). This follows the ΔpK_a rule such that there is a proton transfer from H₂NDS to ( 1 ), forming the reported molecular salts through hydrogen bonding. Prior to salt formation, ( 1 ) is relatively planar and assembles into columnar structures. The salt cocrystal solvates were obtained upon slow cooling of dimethyl sulfoxide–acetonitrile solutions of the molecular components from two temperatures (363 and 393 K). The proton transfer to ( 1 ) significantly alters the conformation of the macrocycle, changing the formerly planar macrocycle into a step‐shaped conformation with trans–cis urea groups in ( 2 ) or into a bowl‐shape conformation with trans–trans urea groups in ( 3 ).     

Sulfur as hydrogen‐bond acceptor in cocrystals of 2‐thio‐modified thymine

Doubly and triply hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular synthons are of particular interest for the rational design of crystal and cocrystal structures in crystal engineering since they show a high robustness due to their high stability and good reliability. The compound 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil (2‐thiothymine) contains an ADA hydrogen‐bonding site (A = acceptor and D = donor) if the S atom is considered as an acceptor. We report herein the results of cocrystallization experiments with the coformers 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine, 2,4‐diamino‐6‐phenyl‐1,3,5‐triazine, 6‐amino‐3H‐isocytosine and melamine, which contain complementary DAD hydrogen‐bonding sites and, therefore, should be capable of forming a mixed ADA–DAD N—H…S/N—H…N/N—H…O synthon (denoted synthon 3s_{N·S;N·N;N·O}), consisting of three different hydrogen bonds with 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil. The experiments yielded one cocrystal and five solvated cocrystals, namely 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine (1/2), C₅H₆N₂OS·2C₄H₆N₄, (I), 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–N,N‐dimethylformamide (2/2/1), 2C₅H₆N₂OS·2C₄H₆N₄·C₃H₇NO, (II), 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–2,4‐diamino‐6‐phenyl‐1,3,5‐triazine–N,N‐dimethylformamide (2/2/1), 2C₅H₆N₂OS·2C₉H₉N₅·C₃H₇NO, (III), 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–6‐amino‐3H‐isocytosine–N,N‐dimethylformamide (2/2/1), (IV), 2C₅H₆N₂OS·2C₄H₆N₄O·C₃H₇NO, (IV), 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–6‐amino‐3H‐isocytosine–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (2/2/1), 2C₅H₆N₂OS·2C₄H₆N₄O·C₄H₉NO, (V), and 5‐methyl‐2‐thiouracil–melamine (3/2), 3C₅H₆N₂OS·2C₃H₆N₆, (VI). Synthon 3s_{N·S;N·N;N·O} was formed in three structures in which two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded networks are observed, while doubly hydrogen‐bonded interactions were formed instead in the remaining three cocrystals whereby three‐dimensional networks are preferred. As desired, the S atoms are involved in hydrogen‐bonding interactions in all six structures, thus illustrating the ability of sulfur to act as a hydrogen‐bond acceptor and, therefore, its value for application in crystal engineering.     

Cocrystals of the antimalarial drug 11‐azaartemisinin with three alkenoic acids of 1:1 or 2:1 stoichiometry

The stoichiometry, X‐ray structures and stability of four pharmaceutical cocrystals previously identified from liquid‐assisted grinding (LAG) of 11‐azaartemisinin (11‐Aza; systematic name: 1,5,9‐trimethyl‐14,15,16‐trioxa‐11‐azatetracyclo[10.3.1.0^4,13.0^8,13]hexadecan‐10‐one) with trans‐cinnamic (Cin), maleic (Mal) and fumaric (Fum) acids are herein reported. trans‐Cinnamic acid, a mono acid, forms 1:1 cocrystal 11‐Aza:Cin ( 1 , C₁₅H₂₃NO₄·C₉H₈O₂). Maleic acid forms both 1:1 cocrystal 11‐Aza:Mal ( 2 , C₁₅H₂₃NO₄·C₄H₄O₄), in which one COOH group is involved in self‐catenation, and 2:1 cocrystal 11‐Aza₂:Mal ( 3 , 2C₁₅H₂₃NO₄·C₄H₄O₄). Its isomer, fumaric acid, only affords 2:1 cocrystal 11‐Aza₂:Fum ( 4 ). All cocrystal formation appears driven by acid–lactam R₂²(8) heterosynthons with short O—H…O=C hydrogen bonds [O…O = 2.56 (2) Å], augmented by weaker C=O…H—N contacts. Despite a better packing efficiency, cocrystal 3 is metastable with respect to 2 , probably due to a higher conformational energy for the maleic acid molecule in its structure. In each case, the microcrystalline powders from LAG were useful in providing seeding for the single‐crystal growth.     

3‐Cyano‐6‐hydroxy‐4‐methyl‐2‐pyridone: two new pseudopolymorphs and two cocrystals with products of an in situ nucleophilic aromatic substitution

Four crystal structures of 3‐cyano‐6‐hydroxy‐4‐methyl‐2‐pyridone (CMP), viz. the dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₇H₆N₂O₂·C₂H₆OS, (1), the N,N‐dimethylacetamide monosolvate, C₇H₆N₂O₂·C₄H₉NO, (2), a cocrystal with 2‐amino‐4‐dimethylamino‐6‐methylpyrimidine (as the salt 2‐amino‐4‐dimethylamino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐1‐ium 5‐cyano‐4‐methyl‐6‐oxo‐1,6‐dihydropyridin‐2‐olate), C₇H₁₃N₄⁺·C₇H₅N₂O₂⁻, (3), and a cocrystal with N,N‐dimethylacetamide and 4,6‐diamino‐2‐dimethylamino‐1,3,5‐triazine [as the solvated salt 2,6‐diamino‐4‐dimethylamino‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium 5‐cyano‐4‐methyl‐6‐oxo‐1,6‐dihydropyridin‐2‐olate–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (1/1)], C₅H₁₁N₆⁺·C₇H₅N₂O₂⁻·C₄H₉NO, (4), are reported. Solvates (1) and (2) both contain the hydroxy group in a para position with respect to the cyano group of CMP, acting as a hydrogen‐bond donor and leading to rather similar packing motifs. In cocrystals (3) and (4), hydrolysis of the solvent molecules occurs and an in situ nucleophilic aromatic substitution of a Cl atom with a dimethylamino group has taken place. Within all four structures, an R₂²(8) N—H...O hydrogen‐bonding pattern is observed, connecting the CMP molecules, but the pattern differs depending on which O atom participates in the motif, either the ortho or para O atom with respect to the cyano group. Solvents and coformers are attached to these arrangements via single‐point O—H...O interactions in (1) and (2) or by additional R₄⁴(16) hydrogen‐bonding patterns in (3) and (4). Since the in situ nucleophilic aromatic substitution of the coformers occurs, the possible Watson–Crick C–G base‐pair‐like arrangement is inhibited, yet the cyano group of the CMP molecules participates in hydrogen bonds with their coformers, influencing the crystal packing to form chains.     

Mechanochemical synthesis and X‐ray structural characterization of three 3‐nitrophenol cocrystals with three aminal cage azaadamantanes: the role of the stereoelectronic effect on intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding patterns

The structures of the cocrystalline adducts of 3‐nitrophenol (3‐NP) with 1,3,5,7‐tetraazatricyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decane [HMTA, ( 1 )] as the 2:1:1 hydrate, 2C₆H₅NO₃·C₆H₁₂N₄·H₂O, ( 1a ), with 1,3,6,8‐tetraazatricyclo[4.3.1.1^3,8]undecane [TATU ( 2 )] as the 2:1 cocrystal, 2C₆H₅NO₃·C₇H₁₄N₄, ( 2a ), and with 1,3,6,8‐tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.1^3,8]dodecane [TATD, ( 3 )] as the 2:1 cocrystal, 2C₆H₅NO₃·C₈H₁₆N₄, ( 3a ), are reported. In the binary crystals ( 2a ) and ( 3a ), the 3‐nitrophenol molecules are linked via O—H…N hydrogen bonds into aminal cage azaadamantanes. In ( 1a ), the structure is stabilized by O—H…N and O—H…O hydrogen bonds, and generates ternary cocrystals. There are C—H…O hydrogen bonds present in all three cocrystals, and in ( 1a ), there are also C—H…O and C—H…π interactions present. The presence of an ethylene bridge in the structures of ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) defines the formation of a hydrogen‐bonded motif in the supramolecular architectures of ( 2a ) and ( 3a ). The differences in the C—N bond lengths of the aminal cage structures, as a result of hyperconjugative interactions and electron delocalization, were analysed. These three cocrystals were obtained by the solvent‐free assisted grinding method. Crystals suitable for single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction were grown by slow evaporation from a mixture of hexanes.