Hypervalent Organoselenium(II) Compounds with Organophosphorus Ligands. Crystal and Molecular Structure of [2‐(iPr2NCH2)C6H4]Se[S2PR′2] (R′ = Ph,OiPr)

Redistribution reactions between diorganodiselenides of type [2‐(R₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]₂Se₂ [R = Et, iPr] and bis(diorganophosphinothioyl disulfanes of type [R′₂P(S)S]₂ (R = Ph, OiPr) resulted in the hypervalent [2‐(R₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]SeSP(S)R′₂ [R = Et, R′ = Ph ( 1 ), OiPr ( 2 ); R = iPr, R′ = Ph ( 3 ), OiPr ( 4 )] species. All new compounds were characterized by solution multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ⁷⁷Se) and the solid compounds 1 , 3 , and 4 also by FT‐IR spectroscopy. The crystal and molecular structures of 3 and 4 were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In both compounds the N(1) atom is intramolecularly coordinated to the selenium atom, resulting in T‐shaped coordination arrangements of type (C,N)SeS. The dithio organophosphorus ligands act monodentate in both complexes, which can be described as essentially monomeric species. Weak intermolecular S ··· H contacts could be considered in the crystal of 3 , thus resulting in polymeric zig‐zag chains of R and S isomers, respectively.     

Metal Derivatives of Thiosemicarbazones: Crystal and Mole­cular Structures of Mono‐ and Dinuclear Copper(II) Complexes with N1‐Subsitituted Salicylaldehyde Thiosemicarbazones

Reactions of copper(II) acetate with N¹‐subsitituted salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazones [R¹R²C²=N³–N²H–C¹(=S)–N¹HR³;R¹ = 2‐HO–C₆H₄–, R² = H : R³ = Me (H₂L¹), Et (H₂L²)] are described. Copper(II) acetate was reacted with H₂L¹ and H₂L² ligands in the presence of polypyridyl co‐ligands, and this led to the formation ofmononuclear complexes, [Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L¹)(κ²‐N, N‐bipy)] ( 1 ),[Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L)(κ²‐N, N‐phen)] [L = L¹ ( 3 ), L² ( 4 )], [Cu(κ³‐O, N, S‐L)(κ²‐N, N‐tmphen)] [L =L¹ ( 5 ), L² ( 6 )] and a dinuclear complex, [Cu₂L²₂(bipy)] ( 2 ) (bipy = 2, 2′‐bipyridine, phen = 1, 10‐phenanthroline, tmphen = 3, 4, 7, 8‐tetramethyl‐1, 10‐phenanthroline). In dinuclear complex 2 , one ligand is O, N³,S‐chelating, while second is O, N³,S‐chelation‐cum‐N²‐bridging; and in all others thio‐ligands are O, N³,S‐chelating. The μ_eff values for the complexes lie in the range of 1.79–1.83 BM. Complexes 1 , 3 – 6 have square pyramidal arrangement, whereas complex 2 has two independent molecules in the crystal lattice, and each molecule has trigonal bipyramidal square planar (5:4) coordination pair. Complexes 2 , 4 , and 6 showed fluorescence properties.     

cis‐[1,4‐Bis(di­phenyl­phosphino)­butane](μ‐tetra­thio­tungstato)­palladium(II) N,N′‐di­methyl­form­amide hemisolvate hemihydrate

In the title compound, [1,4‐bis(di­phenyl­phosphino)­butane‐2κ²P,P′]­di‐μ‐thio‐1:2κ⁴S‐di­thio‐1κ²S‐palladium(II)­tung­sten(VI) N,N′‐di­methyl­form­amide hemisolvate hemihydrate, [PdWS₄­(C₂₈H₂₈P₂)]·0.5C₃H₇NO·0.5H₂O, the Pd atom is coordinated by two S atoms from the distorted‐tetrahedral [WS₄]²⁻ anion and two P atoms from the dppb mol­ecule [dppb is 1,4‐bis(di­phenyl­phos­phino)­butane] in an approximately square‐planar configuration. A puckered seven‐membered ring is formed by the Pd atom and the dppb ligand.     

Die Chelatbildung von N-Tris(2-aminoethyl)amin-N′,N′,N″,N″,N‴,N‴-hexaessigsäure (H6TTAHA) und N-(Pyrid-2-yl-methyl)ethylendiamin-N,N′,N′-triessigsäure (H3PEDTA) mit Gadolinium(III) – Synthesen,Komplexstabilität und NMR-Relaxivität

Chelate Formation of N-Tris(2-aminoethyl)amine-N′,N′,N″,N″,N?,N?-hexaacetic Acid (H₆TTAHA) and N-(Pyrid-2-yl-methyl)ethylenediamine-N,N′,N′-triacetic Acid (H₃PEDTA) with Gadolinium(III) – Syntheses, Stability Constants, and NMR-Relaxivities The chelate formation of N-tris(2-aminoethyl)amine-N′,N′,N″,N″,N?,N?-hexaacetic acid (H₆TTAHA) and N-(pyrid-2-yl-methyl)ethylenediamine-N,N′,N′-triacetic acid (H₃PEDTA) with gadolinium(III) has been studied potentiometrically in aqueous solution at 25°C and μ = 0.1 (KCl). [Gd(TTAHA)]^3?: 1gβ_M/ML = 19.0; {H[Gd(TTAHA)]}^2?: 1gK_H/MHL = 8.30; [Gd(PEDTA)]: 1gβ_M/ML = 15.56. Both 1 : 1 gadolinium(III) complexes were isolated as Na₂H[Gd(C₁₈H₂₄N₄O₁₂)] · 3.5 H₂O and [Gd(C₁₄H₁₆N₃O₆)] · 3 H₂O, respectively. Their ¹H-NMR relaxivities [1 · mmol^?1 · s^?1] ({H[Gd(TTAHA)]}^2?: 9.5; [Gd(PEDTA)]: 8.8) offer promising applications for ¹H-NMR imaging.     

Synthesis and Chloride Affinity of Sterically Demanding Ditopic Lithium Bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates

The synthesis and full characterization of the sterically demanding ditopic lithium bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(Ph)pz^R₂)₂] is reported (pz^R = 3‐phenylpyrazol‐1‐yl ( 3 ^Ph), 3‐t‐butylpyrazol‐1‐yl ( 3 ^tBu)). Compound 3 ^Ph crystallizes from THF as THF‐adduct 3 ^Ph(THF)₄ which features a straight conformation with a long Li···Li distance of 12.68(1) Å. Compound 3 ^tBu was found to function as efficient and selective scavenger of chloride ions. In the presence of LiCl it forms anionic complexes [ 3 ^tBuCl]⁻ with a central Li‐Cl‐Li core (Li···Li = 3.75(1) Å).     

Pyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonates of Nickel(II) and Palladium(II): Synthesis,Structure, and Spectroscopy

Complexes of pyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazones, [(C₄H₄N⁴)(H)C²=N³–N²(H)–C¹(=S)–N¹HR; R = Ph, H₂L¹; Me, H₂L²; H, H₂L³] with nickel(II) and palladium(II) are described. The reaction of nickel(II) acetate with H₂L¹ in methanol in 1:1 molar ratio yielded a complex of composition, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL¹)₂] ( 1 ). Likewise reaction of NiCl₂ with H₂L² in 1:1 molar ratio in acetonitrile in the presence of triethylamine base followed by the addition of pyridine did not yield the anticipated [Ni(κ³‐N⁴,N³,S‐L²)(py)] complex, moreover a bis‐square‐planar complex, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL²)₂] ( 2 ) was formed. However, in the presence of bipyridine (bipy), it yielded the addition product, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL²)₂(κ²‐N, N‐bipy)] ( 3 ). Reaction of PdCl₂(κ²‐P, P–PPh₂–CH₂–PPh₂) with H₂L³ in toluene in the presence of triethylamine has yielded a complex of stoichiometry, [Pd(κ³‐N⁴,N³,S–L³)(κ¹‐P–PPh₂–CH₂–P(O)Ph₂] ( 4 ). The ligands (HL¹)^– and (HL²)^– are chelating to Ni^II metal atom as anions binding through N³,S‐donor atoms with pendant pyrrole groups, and (L³)^2– is chelating to the Pd^II metal atom as dianion through N⁴,N³,S‐donor atoms (pyrrole is N⁴‐bonded). Fourth site in 4 is bonded to one P‐donor atom of PPh₂–CH₂–P(O)Ph₂, whose pendant –PPh₂ group involves auto oxidation to –P(O)PPh₂ during reaction. These complexes were characterized using analytical data, IR, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 1 , 2 , and 4 have square‐planar arrangement, whereas complex 3 is octahedral.     

Chloro‐N′,N′‐dimethylformamidinium‐(dimethylcyanamid)trichloroberyllat, [Me2NC(Cl)NH2]+[BeCl3(NCNMe2)]−

Chloro‐N′,N′‐dimethylformamidinium‐(dimethylcyanamide)trichloroberyllate, [Me₂NC(Cl)NH₂]⁺[BeCl₃(NCNMe₂)]^? Chloro‐N′,N′‐dimethylformamidinium‐(dimethylcyanamide)trichloroberyllate, [Me₂NC(Cl)NH₂]⁺[BeCl₃(NCNMe₂)]^? was prepared from BeCl₂ with two equivalents of dimethylcyanamide in CH₂Cl₂ suspension. The compound was characterized by X‐ray crystallography and by IR spectroscopy. Space group , Z = 2, lattice dimensions at 193 K: a = 620.7(1), b = 744.9(2), c = 1520.3(3) pm, α = 96.87(2)°, β = 100.41(2)°, γ = 100.17(2)°, R₁ = 0.0443. Cations and anions form N–H…Cl hydrogen bridges along [010].     

Metal Derivatives of 1,3‐Imidazolidine‐2‐thione with Divalent d10 Metal Ions (Zn–Hg) : Synthesis and Structures

Reactions of divalent Zn‐Hg metal ions with 1,3‐imidazolidine‐2‐thione (imdtH₂) in 1 : 2 molar ratio have formed monomeric complexes, [Zn(η¹‐S‐imdtH₂)₂(OAc)₂] ( 1 ), [Cd((η¹‐SimdtH₂)₂I₂] ( 2 ), [Cd(η¹‐S‐imdtH₂)₂Br₂] ( 3 ), and [Hg(η¹‐S‐imdtH₂)₂I₂] ( 4 ). Complexes 1 – 4 , have been characterized by elemental analysis (C, H, N), spectroscopy (IR, ¹H, NMR) and x‐ray crystallography ( 1 ‐ 4 ). Hydrogen bonding between oxygen of acetate and imino hydrogen of ligand, {N(2)–H(2C)···O(2)^#} in 1 , ring CH and imino hydrogen, {C(2A)–H(2A)···Br(2)^#} in 3 have formed H‐bonded dimers. Similarly, the interactions between molecular units of complexes 2 and 4 have yielded 2D polymers. The polymerization occurs via intermolecular interactions between thione sulfur and imino hydrogen, {N(2)–H(2)···S(1)^#}, imino hydrogen and the iodine atom, {NH(1)···I(2)^#} in 2 and imino hydrogen – iodine atom {N(2A)–H(2A)···I(2)} and I···I interaction in 4 . Crystal data: [Zn(η¹‐S‐imdtH₂)₂(OAc)₂] ( 1 ), C₁₀H₁₈N₄O₄S₂Zn, orthorhombic, Pbcn, a = 9.3854(7) Å, b = 12.4647(10) Å, c = 13.2263(11) Å; V = 1547.3(2) ų, Z = 4, R = 0.0280 [Cd((η¹‐S‐imdtH₂)₂I₂] ( 2 ), C₆H₁₂CdI₂N₄S₂, orthorhombic, Pnma, a = 13.8487(10) Å, b = 14.4232(11) Å, c = 7.0659(5) Å; Z = 4, V = 1411.36(18) ų, R = 0.0186.     

A novel dinuclear MoVI complex with tris(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methane

Recrystallization of [MoO₂Cl{HC(3,5‐Me₂pz)₃}]Cl [where HC(3,5‐Me₂pz)₃ is tris(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methane] led to the isolation of large quantities of the dinuclear complex dichlorido‐2κ²Cl‐μ‐oxido‐κ²O:O‐tetraoxido‐1κ²O,2κ²O‐[tris(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐1κN²)methane]dimolybdenum(IV) acetonitrile monosolvate, [Mo₂Cl₂O₄(C₁₆H₂₂N₆)]·CH₃CN or [{MoO₂Cl₂}(μ₂‐O){MoO₂[HC(3,5‐Me₂pz)₃]}]·CH₃CN. At 150 K, this complex cocrystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbcm with an acetonitrile molecule. The complex has mirror symmetry: only half of the complex constitutes the asymmetric unit and all the heavy elements (namely Mo and Cl) are located on the mirror plane. The acetonitrile molecule also lies on a mirror plane. The two crystallographically independent Mo⁶⁺ centres have drastically different coordination environments: while one Mo atom is hexacoordinated and chelated to HC(3,5‐Me₂pz)₃ (which occupies one face of the octahedron), the other Mo atom is instead pentacoordinated, having two chloride anions in the apical positions of the distorted trigonal bipyramid. This latter coordination mode of Mo^VI was found to be unprecedented. Individual complexes and solvent molecules are close‐packed in the solid state, mediated by various supramolecular contacts.     

Mononuclear nickel(II) and zinc(II) complexes with deprotonated forms of the tripodal hexadentate ligand 1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methylpropane‐1,3‐diamine

In the crystal structures of both title compounds, [1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐methyl‐2‐(2‐oxidobenzylideneaminomethyl)propane‐1,3‐diamine]nickel(II) [2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methyl‐1,3‐bis(2‐oxidobenzylidene)propane‐1,3‐diamine]nickel(II) chloride methanol disolvate, [Ni(C₂₆H_25.5N₃O₃)]₂Cl·2CH₄O, and [1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐methyl‐2‐(2‐oxidobenzylideneaminomethyl)propane‐1,3‐diamine]zinc(II) perchlorate [2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methyl‐1,3‐bis(2‐oxidobenzylidene)propane‐1,3‐diamine]zinc(II) methanol trisolvate, [Zn(C₂₆H₂₅N₃O₃)]ClO₄·[Zn(C₂₆H₂₆N₃O₃)]·3CH₄O, the 3d metal ion is in an approximately octahedral environment composed of three facially coordinated imine N atoms and three phenol O atoms. The two mononuclear units are linked by three phenol–phenolate O—H...O hydrogen bonds to form a dimeric structure. In the Ni compound, the asymmetric unit consists of one mononuclear unit, one‐half of a chloride anion and a methanol solvent molecule. In the O—H...O hydrogen bonds, two H atoms are located near the centre of O...O and one H atom is disordered over two positions. The Ni^II compound is thus formulated as [Ni(H_1.5L)]₂Cl·2CH₃OH [H₃L is 1,3‐bis(2‐hydroxybenzylidene)‐2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)‐2‐methylpropane‐1,3‐diamine]. In the analogous Zn^II compound, the asymmetric unit consists of two crystallographically independent mononuclear units, one perchlorate anion and three methanol solvent molecules. The mode of hydrogen bonding connecting the two mononuclear units is slightly different, and the formula can be written as [Zn(H₂L)]ClO₄·[Zn(HL)]·3CH₃OH. In both compounds, each mononuclear unit is chiral with either a Δ or a Λ configuration because of the screw coordination arrangement of the achiral tripodal ligand around the 3d metal ion. In the dimeric structure, molecules with Δ–Δ and Λ–Λ pairs co‐exist in the crystal structure to form a racemic crystal. A notable difference is observed between the M—O(phenol) and M—O(phenolate) bond lengths, the former being longer than the latter. In addition, as the ionic radius of the metal ion decreases, the M—O and M—N bond distances decrease.     

Different nucleobase orientations in two cyclic 2′,3′‐phosphates of purine ribonucleosides: Et3NH(2′,3′‐cAMP) and Et3NH(2′,3′‐cGMP)·H2O

The crystal structures of triethyl­ammonium adenosine cyclic 2′,3′‐phosphate {systematic name: triethyl­ammonium 4‐(6‐amino­purin‐9‐yl)‐6‐hydroxy­methyl‐2‐oxido‐2‐oxoperhydro­furano[3,4‐c][1,3,2]dioxaphosphole}, Et₃NH(2′,3′‐cAMP) or C₆H₁₆N⁺·C₁₀H₁₁N₅O₆P⁻, (I), and guanosine cyclic 2′,3′‐phosphate monohydrate {systematic name: triethyl­ammonium 6‐hydroxy­methyl‐2‐oxido‐2‐oxo‐4‐(6‐oxo‐1,6‐dihydro­purin‐9‐yl)perhydro­furano[3,4‐c][1,3,2]dioxaphosphole monohydrate}, [Et₃NH(2′,3′‐cGMP)]·H₂O or C₆H₁₆N⁺·C₁₀H₁₁N₅O₇P⁻·H₂O, (II), reveal different nucleobase orientations, viz. anti in (I) and syn in (II). These are stabilized by different inter‐ and intra­molecular hydrogen bonds. The structures also exhibit different ribose ring puckering [₄E in (I) and ³T₂ in (II)] and slightly different 1,3,2‐dioxaphospho­lane ring conformations, viz. envelope in (I) and puckered in (II). Infinite ribbons of 2′,3′‐cAMP⁻ and helical chains of 2′,3′‐cGMP⁻ ions, both formed by O—H⋯O, N—H⋯X and C—H⋯X (X = O or N) hydrogen‐bond contacts, characterize (I) and (II), respectively.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the guanidinium salts of the monocyclic dicarboxylic acids rac‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐dicarboxylic acid (2:1, anhydrous), isophthalic acid (1:1, monohydrate) and terephthalic acid (2:1, trihydrate)

The structures of bis(guanidinium) rac‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐dicarboxylate, 2CH₆N₃⁺·C₈H₁₀O₄²⁻, (I), guanidinium 3‐carboxybenzoate monohydrate, CH₆N₃⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻·H₂O, (II), and bis(guanidinium) benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate trihydrate, 2CH₆N₃⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻·3H₂O, (III), all reveal three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded framework structures. In anhydrous (I), both guanidinium cations form classic cyclic R₂²(8) N—H...O,O′_carboxylate and asymmetric cyclic R₂¹(6) hydrogen‐bonding interactions, while one cation forms an unusual enlarged cyclic interaction with O‐atom acceptors of separate ortho‐related carboxylate groups [graph set R₂²(11)]. Cations and anions also associate across inversion centres, giving cyclic R₄²(8) motifs. In the 1:1 guanidinium salt, (II), the cation forms two separate cyclic R₂¹(6) interactions, one with a carboxyl O‐atom acceptor and the other with the solvent water molecule. The structure is unusual in that both carboxyl groups form short interanion O...H...O contacts, one across a crystallographic inversion centre [O...O = 2.483 (2) Å] and the other about a twofold axis of rotation [O...O = 2.462 (2) Å], representing shared sites on these elements for the single acid H atom. The water molecule links the cation–anion ribbon structures into a three‐dimensional framework. In (III), the repeating molecular unit comprises a benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate dianion which lies across a crystallographic inversion centre, two guanidinium cations and two solvent water molecules (each set related by twofold rotational symmetry), and a single water molecule which lies on a twofold axis. Each guanidinium cation forms three types of cyclic interaction with the dianions: one R₂¹(6), the others R₃²(8) and R₃³(10) (both of these involving the water molecules), giving a three‐dimensional structure through bridges down the b‐cell direction. The water molecule at the general site also forms an unusual cyclic R₂²(4) homodimeric association across an inversion centre [O...O = 2.875 (2) Å]. The work described here provides further examples of the common cyclic guanidinium–carboxylate hydrogen‐bonding associations, as well as featuring other less common cyclic motifs.     

Synthese,Struktur und Photochemie von Olefiniridium(I)‐Komplexen mit Acetylacetonatoliganden

Synthesis, Structure, and Photochemical Behavior of Olefine Iridium(I) Complexes with Acetylacetonato Ligands The bis(ethene) complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 1 ) reacts with tertiary phosphanes to give the monosubstitution products [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)(PR₃)] ( 2 – 5 ). While 2 (R = iPr) is inert toward PiPr₃, the reaction of 2 with diphenylacetylene affords the π‐alkyne complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂Ph₂)(PiPr₃)] ( 6 ). Treatment of [IrCl(C₂H₄)₄] with C‐functionalized acetylacetonates yields the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 8 , 9 ), which react with PiPr₃ to give [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)(PiPr₃)] ( 10 , 11 ) by displacement of one ethene ligand. UV irradiation of 5 (PR₃ = iPr₂PCH₂CO₂Me) and 11 (R² = (CH₂)₃CO₂Me) leads, after addition of PiPr₃, to the formation of the hydrido(vinyl)iridium(III) complexes 7 and 12 . The reaction of 2 with the ethene derivatives CH₂=CHR (R = CN, OC(O)Me, C(O)Me) affords the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acac)(CH₂=CHR)(PiPr₃)] ( 13 – 15 ), which on photolysis in the presence of PiPr₃ also undergo an intramolecular C–H activation. In contrast, the analogous complexes [Ir(κ²‐acac)(olefin)(PiPr₃)] (olefin = (E)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 16 , (Z)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 17 ) are photochemically inert.     

Hydrido‐sulfido‐bridged triangular Os3 cluster compounds with different phosphine ligand substitution patterns

In the course of our studies of trinuclear osmium cluster complexes with bridging sulfido and hydrido ligands, the new compounds Os₃(μ‐H)(μ‐SR)(CO)₉(PHCy₂) (Cy = cyclo­hexyl) with R = phenyl, (I) (nona­carbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ³C,3κ³C‐di­cyclo­hexyl­phosphine‐3κP‐μ‐hydrido‐1:2κ²H‐μ‐phenyl­thio‐1:2κ²S‐triangulo‐triosmium), [Os₃H(C₆H₅S)(C₁₂H₂₃P)(CO)₉], and R = naphthyl, (II) [nona­carbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ²C,3κ⁴C‐di­cyclo­hexyl­phosphine‐2κP‐μ‐hydrido‐1:2κ²H‐μ‐(2‐naphthyl­thio)‐1:2κ²S‐triangulo‐triosmium], [Os₃H(C₁₀H₇S)(C₁₂H₂₃P)(CO)₉], were prepared. We report on these two phosphine‐substituted complexes, which exhibit perceptible changes of the Os—Os bond parameters due to the ligand‐substitution pattern.     

Die Kristallstrukturen des Phosphaniminato‐Komplexes [INi(NPMe3)]4 · C4H8O · C7H8 und des Phosphanimin‐Komplexes [INi{Me2Si(NPMe3)2}(HNPMe3)]+I—

Crystal Structures of the Phosphoraneiminato Complex [INi(NPMe₃)]₄ · C₄H₈O · C7H₈ and of the Phosphanimine Complex [INi{Me₂Si(NPMe₃)₂}(HNPMe₃)]⁺I^— The phosphoraneiminato complex [INi(NPMe₃)]₄ was obtained by reaction of NiI₂ in molten Me₃SiNPMe₃ in the presence of potassium fluoride at 200 °C. Dark‐green single crystals of [INi(NPMe₃)]₄ · C₄H₈O · C₇H₈ were formed from THF‐toluene solution. According to the X‐ray crystal structure determination the complex has a Ni₄N₄ heterocubane core and its symmetry deviates only marginally from T_d (space group Pca2₁, Z = 4, a = 3160.7(6), b = 1001.5(1), c = 1422.6(8) pm). The [INi(NPMe₃)]₄ molecules are stacked to columns parallel to b, with a nearly tetragonal pattern in projection on (010). The solvent molecules reside in channels between the columns. A side product of the synthesis were blue single crystals of the phosphanimine complex [INi{Me₂Si(NPMe₃)₂}(HNPMe₃)]⁺I^—. The crystal structure determination (space group Pca2₁, Z = 4, a = 1213.3(4), b = 1582.7(6), c = 1339.7(4) pm) revealed a distorted tetrahedral coordination of the Ni atom in the cation; the coordinated atoms are the two N atoms of the chelating bis(phosphane)imine molecule, the N atom of the phosphaneimine molecule HNPMe₃ and one iodo ligand.     

A chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine)­ruthenium(II) complex

The aldehyde moiety in the title complex, chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ³N)ruthenium(II)–chloro­(2‐pyridine­carboxyl­ic acid‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine‐κ³N)­ruthenium(II)–perchlorate–chloro­form–water (1.8/0.2/2/1/1), [RuCl­(C₆H₅NO)­(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_1.8[RuCl­(C₆H₅­NO₂)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_0.2­(ClO₄)₂·­CHCl₃·­H₂O, is a structural model of substrate coordination to a transfer hydrogenation catalyst. The title complex features two independent Ru^II complex cations that display very similar distorted octahedral coordination provided by the three N atoms of the 2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine ligand, the N and O atoms of the 2‐pyridine­carbox­aldehyde (pyCHO) ligand and a chloride ligand. One of the cation sites is disordered such that the aldehyde group is replaced by a 20 (1)% contribution from a carboxyl­ic acid group (aldehyde H replaced by carboxyl O—H). Notable dimensions in the non‐disordered complex cation are Ru—N 2.034 (2) Å and Ru—O 2.079 (2) Å to the pyCHO ligand and O—C 1.239 (4) Å for the pyCHO carbonyl group.     

Quasi‐living copolymerization of ethylene with 1‐hexene by heteroligated (salicylaldiminato β‐enaminoketonato) titanium complexes

A series of heteroligated (salicylaldiminato)(β‐enaminoketonato)titanium complexes [3‐Bu^t‐2‐OC₆H₃CH = N(C₆F₅)] [PhN = C(R₁)CHC(R₂)O]TiCl₂ [ 3a : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = ^tBu; 3b : R₁ = Me, R₂ = CF₃; 3c : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = Ph; 3d : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Ph(p ); 3e : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Ph(o ); 3f : R = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Cl(p ); 3g : R₁ = CF₃; R₂ = C₆H₃Cl₂(2,5); 3h : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Me(p )] were investigated as catalysts for ethylene (co)polymerization. In the presence of modified methylaluminoxane as a cocatalyst, these complexes showed activities about 50%–1000% and 10%–100% higher than their corresponding bis(β‐enaminoketonato) titanium complexes for ethylene homo‐ and ethylene/1‐hexene copolymerization, respectively. They produced high or moderate molecular weight copolymers with 1‐hexene incorporations about 10%–200% higher than their homoligated counterpart pentafluorinated FI‐Ti complex. Among them, complex 3b displayed the highest activity [2.06 × 10⁶ g/mol_Ti?h], affording copolymers with the highest 1‐hexene incorporations of 34.8 mol% under mild conditions. Moreover, catalyst 3h with electron‐donating group not only exhibited much higher 1‐hexene incorporations (9.0 mol% vs. 3.2 mol%) than pentafluorinated FI‐Ti complex but also generated copolymers with similar narrow molecular weight distributions (M _w/M _n = 1.20–1.26). When the 1‐hexene concentration in the feed was about 2.0 mol/L and the hexene incorporation of resultant polymer was about 9.0 mol%, a quasi‐living copolymerization behavior could be achieved. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic analysis of their resulting copolymers demonstrated the possible copolymerization mechanism, which was related with the chain initiation, monomer insertion style, chain transfer and termination during the polymerization process. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55 , 2787–2797     

Functionalised Tris(pyrazolyl)methane Ligands and Re(CO)3 Complexes Thereof

The synthesis of new tripodal nitrogen ligands derived from tris(pyrazolyl)methane (Tpm^R, R = H, tBu, Ph in 3‐position) is described. After deprotonation of the parent tris(pyrazolyl)methane Tpm^R, the carbanion reacts readily with ethylene oxide to yield the 3,3,3‐tris(3′‐substituted pyrazolyl)propanol ligands[(3‐Rpz)₃CCH₂CH₂OH, R = H, tBu, Ph, 1a – c ]. These ligands can be easily derivatised at the alcohol function. Microwave‐assisted reactions of these ligands and [Re(CO)₅Br] yields the complex [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]Br ( 4 ) in the case of ligand 1a , whereas in the case of the substituted ligands 1b and 1c degradation was observed. The degradation products are identified as [(Hpz^R)₂Re(CO)₃Br] [R = tBu ( 7b ), Ph ( 7c )]. These complexes were also prepared directly from [Re(CO)₅Br] and the corresponding pyrazoles by microwave‐assisted synthesis. The Re(CO)₃ complexes 4 and [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]OTf ( 5 ) are water‐soluble. The structures of 5· H₂O and [{(pz)₃CCH₂CH₃}Re(CO)₃]OTf · 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN ( 6· 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN) as well as the structure of 7b have been elucidated by X‐ray crystallography.     

Ein‐ und zweikernige Rhodiumkomplexe mit Arsino(phosphino)methanen in unterschiedlichen Koordinationsformen

Mono‐ and Dinuclear Rhodium Complexes with Arsino(phosphino)methanes in Different Coordination Modes The cyclooctadiene complex [Rh(η⁴‐C₈H₁₂)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)](PF₆) ( 1a ) reacts with CO and CNtBu to give the substitution products [Rh(L)₂(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)](PF₆) ( 2 , 3 ). From 1a and Na(acac) in the presence of CO the neutral compound [Rh(κ²‐acac)(CO)(κ‐P‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 4 ) is formed. The reactions of 1a , the corresponding B(Ar_F)₄‐salt 1b and [Rh(η⁴‐C₈H₁₂)(κ²‐iPr₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)](PF₆) ( 5 ) with acetonitrile under a H₂ atmosphere affords the complexes [Rh(CH₃CN)₂(κ²‐R₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)]X ( 6a , 6b , 7 ), of which 6a (R = tBu; X = PF₆) gives upon treatment with Na(acac‐f₆) the bis(chelate) compound [Rh(κ²‐acac‐f₆)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 8 ). From 8 and CH₃I a mixture of two stereoisomers of composition [Rh(CH₃)I(κ²‐acac‐f₆)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 9/10 ) is generated by oxidative addition, and the molecular structure of the racemate 9 has been determined. The reactions of 1a and 5 with CO in the presence of NaCl leads to the formation of the “A‐frame” complexes [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ‐Cl)(μ‐R₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)₂](PF₆) ( 11 , 12 ), which have been characterized crystallographically. From 11 and 12 the dinuclear substitution products [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ‐X)(μ‐R₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)₂](PF₆) ( 13 ‐ 16 ) are obtained by replacing the bridging chloride for bromide, hydride or hydroxide, respectively. While 12 (R = iPr) reacts with NaI to give the related “A‐frame” complex 18 , treatment of 11 (R = tBu) with NaI yields the mononuclear chelate compound [RhI(CO)(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 20 ). The reaction of 20 with CH₃I affords the acetyl complex [RhI₂{C(O)CH₃}(κ²‐tBu₂AsCH₂PiPr₂)] ( 21 ) with five‐coordinate rhodium atom.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l‐tartaric acid with the associative‐group monosubstituted pyridines 3‐aminopyridine, 3‐carboxypyridine (nicotinic acid) and 2‐carboxypyridine (picolinic acid)

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l ‐tartaric acid with 3‐aminopyridine [3‐aminopyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate dihydrate, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·2H₂O, (I)], pyridine‐3‐carboxylic acid (nicotinic acid) [anhydrous 3‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻, (II)] and pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid [2‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate monohydrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·H₂O, (III)] have been determined. In (I) and (II), there is a direct pyridinium–carboxyl N⁺—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interaction, four‐centred in (II), giving conjoint cyclic R₁²(5) associations. In contrast, the N—H...O association in (III) is with a water O‐atom acceptor, which provides links to separate tartrate anions through O_hydroxy acceptors. All three compounds have the head‐to‐tail C(7) hydrogen‐bonded chain substructures commonly associated with 1:1 proton‐transfer hydrogen tartrate salts. These chains are extended into two‐dimensional sheets which, in hydrates (I) and (III) additionally involve the solvent water molecules. Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures are generated via crosslinking through the associative functional groups of the substituted pyridinium cations. In the sheet struture of (I), both water molecules act as donors and acceptors in interactions with separate carboxyl and hydroxy O‐atom acceptors of the primary tartrate chains, closing conjoint cyclic R₄⁴(8), R₃⁴(11) and R₃³(12) associations. Also, in (II) and (III) there are strong cation carboxyl–carboxyl O—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.5387 (17) Å in (II) and 2.441 (3) Å in (III)], which in (II) form part of a cyclic R₂²(6) inter‐sheet association. This series of heteroaromatic Lewis base–hydrogen l ‐tartrate salts provides further examples of molecular assembly facilitated by the presence of the classical two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded hydrogen tartrate or hydrogen tartrate–water sheet substructures which are expanded into three‐dimensional frameworks via peripheral cation bifunctional substituent‐group crosslinking interactions.