共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Anjos JC Appel JA Bean A Bracker SB Browder TE Cremaldi LM Danner GM Duboscq J Elliott JR Escobar CO Gibney MC Gordon AS Hartner GF Karchin PE Kumar BR Losty MJ Luste GJ Mantsch PM Martin JF McHugh S Menary SR Morrison RJ Nash T Ong P Pinfold J Punkar G Purohit MV Raab JR Ross WR Santoro AF Shoup AL Sidhu JS Sliwa K Sokoloff MD Souza MH Streetman ME Stundzia AB Volkmuth WD Witherell MS 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1993,48(1):56-62
3.
4.
Anjos JC Appel JA Bean A Bracker SB Browder TE Cremaldi LM Duboscq JE Elliott JR Escobar CO Gibney MC Hartner GF Huber J Karchin PE Kumar BR Losty MJ Luste GJ Mantsch PM Martin JF McHugh S Menary SR Morrison RJ Nash T Pinfold J Punkar G Purohit MV Ross WR Santoro AF Schmidt DM Shoup AL Sliwa K Sokoloff MD Souza MH Sperka D Spalding WJ Streetman ME Stundzia AB Witherell MS 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1992,46(5):1941-1950
5.
Ko P 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1993,47(5):1964-1972
6.
7.
Anjos JC Appel JA Bean A Bracker SB Browder TE Cremaldi LM Duboscq JE Elliott JR Escobar CO Gibney MC Hartner GF Karchin PE Kumar BR Losty MJ Luste GJ Mantsch PM Martin JF McHugh S Menary SR Morrison RJ Nash T Ong P Pinfold J Punkar G Purohit MV Santoro AF Sidhu JS Shoup AL Sliwa K Sokoloff MD Souza MH Spalding WJ Streetman ME Stundzia AB Witherell MS 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1990,42(7):2414-2418
8.
Anjos JC Appel JA Bean A Bracker SB Browder TE Cremaldi LM Duboscq JE Elliott JR Escobar CO Gibney MC Hartner GF Karchin PE Kumar BR Losty MJ Luste GJ Mantsch PM Martin JF McHugh S Menary SR Morrison RJ Nash T Nauenberg U Ong P Pinfold J Punkar G Purohit MV Santoro AF Sidhu JS Shoup AL Sliwa K Sokoloff MD Souza MH Spalding WJ Streetman ME Stundzia AB Witherell MS 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1990,41(9):2705-2708
9.
He Q Insler J Muramatsu H Park CS Thorndike EH Yang F Coan TE Gao YS Artuso M Blusk S Butt J Li J Menaa N Mountain R Nisar S Randrianarivony K Sia R Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Zhang K Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Lincoln A Asner DM Edwards KW Briere RA Ferguson T Tatishvili G Vogel H Watkins ME Rosner JL Adam NE Alexander JP Cassel DG Duboscq JE Ehrlich R Fields L Gibbons L Gray R Gray SW Hartill DL Heltsley BK Hertz D Jones CD Kandaswamy J Kreinick DL Kuznetsov VE Mahlke-Krüger H 《Physical review letters》2008,100(9):091801
We present measurements of D--> KS0 pi and D--> KL0 pi branching fractions using 281 pb(-1) of psi(3770) data at the CLEO-c experiment. We find that B(D0--> KS0 pi 0) is larger than B(D0--> KL0 pi 0), with an asymmetry of R(D0)=0.108+/-0.025+/-0.024. For B(D+--> KS0 pi+) and B(D+--> KL0 pi+), we observe no measurable difference; the asymmetry is R(D+)=0.022+/-0.016+/-0.018. The D0 asymmetry is consistent with the value based on the U-spin prediction A(D0--> K0 pi 0)/A(D0--> K0 pi 0)=-tan2 theta C, where theta C is the Cabibbo angle. 相似文献
10.
Cronin-Hennessy D Gao KY Gong DT Hietala J Kubota Y Klein T Lang BW Poling R Scott AW Smith A Zweber P Dobbs S Metreveli Z Seth KK Tomaradze A Ernst J Severini H Dytman SA Love W Savinov V Aquines O Li Z Lopez A Mehrabyan S Mendez H Ramirez J Huang GS Miller DH Pavlunin V Sanghi B Shipsey IP Xin B Adams GS Anderson M Cummings JP Danko I Napolitano J He Q Insler J Muramatsu H Park CS Thorndike EH Yang F Coan TE Gao YS Liu F Artuso M Blusk S Butt J Li J Menaa N Mountain R Nisar S 《Physical review letters》2008,100(25):251802
By using 1.8x10{6} DDpairs, we have measured B(D{0}-->pi{-}e{+}nu{e})=0.299(11)(9)%, B(D{+}-->pi{0}e{+}nu{e})=0.373(22)(13)%, B(D{0}-->K{-}e{+}nu{e})=3.56(3)(9)%, and B(D{+}-->K{0}e{+}nu{e})=8.53(13)(23)% and have studied the q;{2} dependence of the form factors. By combining our results with recent lattice calculations, we obtain |V{cd}|=0.217(9)(4)(23) and |V{cs}|=1.015(10)(11)(106). 相似文献
11.
Selen M Sadoff AJ Ammar R Ball S Baringer P Coppage D Copty N Davis R Hancock N Kelly M Kwak N Lam H Kubota Y Lattery M Nelson JK Patton S Perticone D Poling R Savinov V Schrenk S Wang R Alam MS Kim IJ Nemati B O'Neill JJ Severini H Sun CR Zoeller MM Crawford G Daubenmeir CM Fulton R Fujino D Gan KK Honscheid K Kagan H Kass R Lee J Malchow R Morrow F Skovpen Y Sung M White C Whitmore J Wilson P Butler F Fu X Kalbfleisch G Lambrecht M Ross WR Skubic P Snow J Wang PL Wood M Bortoletto D Brown DN 《Physical review letters》1993,71(13):1973-1977
12.
Atiya MS Chiang I Frank JS Haggerty JS Ito MM Kycia TF Li KK Littenberg LS Stevens A Strand RC Louis WC Akerib DS Marlow DR Meyers PD Selen MA Shoemaker FC Smith AJ Azuelos G Blackmore EW Bryman DA Felawka L Kitching P Kuno Y Macdonald JA Numao T Padley P Poutissou J Poutissou R Roy J 《Physical review letters》1990,65(1):21-24
13.
Atiya MS Chiang IH Frank JS Haggerty JS Ito MM Kycia TF Li KK Littenberg LS Sambamurti A Stevens A Strand RC Louis WC Akerib DS Marlow DR Meyers PD Selen MA Shoemaker FC Smith AJ Blackmore EW Bryman DA Felawka L Kitching P Konaka A Kuno Y Macdonald JA Numao T Padley P Poutissou JM Poutissou R Roy J Soluk R Turcot AS 《Physical review letters》1993,70(17):2521-2524
14.
15.
Adler S Atiya MS Chiang IH Frank JS Haggerty JS Kycia TF Li KK Littenberg LS Sambamurti A Stevens A Strand RC Witzig C Louis WC Akerib DS Ardebili M Convery MR Ito MM Marlow DR McPherson RA Meyers PD Selen MA Shoemaker FC Smith AJ Blackmore EW Bryman DA Felawka L Kitching P Konaka A Kujala VA Kuno Y Macdonald JA Nakano T Numao T Padley P Poutissou JM Poutissou R Roy J Soluk R Turcot AS 《Physical review letters》1996,76(9):1421-1424
16.
Artuso M Blusk S Butt J Li J Menaa N Mountain R Nisar S Randrianarivony K Sia R Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Zhang K Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Lincoln A Asner DM Edwards KW Naik P Briere RA Ferguson T Tatishvili G Vogel H Watkins ME Rosner JL Adam NE Alexander JP Cassel DG Duboscq JE Ehrlich R Fields L Galik RS Gibbons L Gray R Gray SW Hartill DL Heltsley BK Hertz D Jones CD Kandaswamy J Kreinick DL Kuznetsov VE Mahlke-Krüger H Mohapatra D Onyisi PU Patterson JR Peterson D Pivarski J 《Physical review letters》2007,99(19):191801
Using a 281 pb{-1} data sample collected at the psi(3770) with the CLEO-c detector, we present the first absolute branching fraction measurement of the decay D0-->K(-)pi(+)pi(-)e(+)nu(e) at a statistical significance of about 4.0 standard deviations. We find 10 candidates consistent with the decay D0-->K(-)pi(+)pi(-)e(+)nu(e). The probability that a background fluctuation accounts for this signal is less than 4.1 x 10{-5}. We find B(D0-->K(-)pi(+)pi(-)e(+)nu(e)) = [2.8{-1.1}{+1.4}(stat)+/-0.3(syst)]x10{-4}. By restricting the invariant mass of the hadronic system to be consistent with K1(1270), we obtain the product of branching fractions B(D{0}-->K{1}{-}(1270)e{+}nu{e})xB(K1-(1270)-->K{-}pi{+}pi{-})=[2.5{-1.0}{+1.3}(stat)+/-0.2(syst)]x10{-4}. Using B(K1-(1270)-->K{-}pi{+}pi{-})=(33+/-3)%, we obtain B(D{0}-->K{1}{-}(1270)e{+}nu{e})=[7.6{-3.0}{+4.1}(stat)+/-0.6(syst)+/-0.7]x10{-4}. The last error accounts for the uncertainties in the measured K1-(1270)-->K{-}pi{+}pi{-} branching fractions. 相似文献
17.
Makoff G Barker AR Briere RA Gibbons LK Papadimitriou V Patterson JR Somalwar SV Wah YW Winstein B Winston R Woods M Yamamoto H Swallow EC Bock GJ Coleman R Enagonio J Hsiung YB Ramberg E Stanfield K Tschirhart R Yamanaka T Gollin GD Karlsson M Okamitsu K Debu P Peyaud B Turlay R Vallage B 《Physical review letters》1993,70(11):1591-1594
18.
19.