Effects of Montmorillonite on the Nonisothermal Crystallization Behavior of the Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Polypropylene/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites

Organic montmorillonite (MMT) reinforced poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/ polypropylene (PP) nanocomposites were prepared by melt blending. The effects of MMT on the nonisothermal crystallization of the matrix polymers were investigated using differential scanning colorimetry (DSC) and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The DSC results indicated that the effects of MMT on the crystallization processes of the two polymers exhibited great disparity. The PTT's crystallization was accelerated significantly by MMT no matter whether PTT was the continuous phase or not, but the thermal nucleation mode and three-dimensional growth mechanism remained unchanged. However, in the presence of MMT, the PP's crystallization was slightly retarded with PP as the dispersed phase, and was influenced little with PTT as the dispersed phase. When the MMT content was increased from 2_wt% to 7_wt%, the crystallization of the PTT phase was slightly accelerated, whereas the crystallization of the PP phase was severely retarded, especially at lower temperatures. Moreover, the nucleation mechanism for the PP's crystallization changed from a thermal mode to an athermal one. In the polypropylene-graft-maleic anhydride (PP-g-MAH) compatibilized PTT/PP blends, with the addition of 2_wt% MMT during melt blending, the T _c (PTT) shifted 7.8°C to lower temperature and had a broadened exotherm, whereas the T _c (PP) shifted 17.1°C to higher temperature, with a narrowed exotherm. TEM analysis confirmed that part of the PP-g-MAH was combined with MMT during blending.     

Preparation,Morphology and Properties of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Thermoplastic Polyester Elastomer Blends

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)(PTT)/thermoplastic polyester elastomer (TPEE) blends were prepared and their miscibility, crystallization and melting behaviors, phase morphology, dynamic mechanical behavior, rheology behavior, spherulites morphology, and mechanical properties were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), parallel-plate rotational rheometry, polarized optical microscopy (POM), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), universal tensile tester and impact tester, respectively. The results suggested that PTT and TPEE were partially miscible in the amorphous state, the TPEE rich phase was dispersed uniformly in the solid matrix with a size smaller than 2 μm, and the glass transition temperatures of the blends decreased with increasing TPEE content. The TPEE component had a good effect on toughening the PTT without depressing the tensile strength. The blends had improved melt viscosities for processing. When the blends crystallized from the melt state, the onset crystallization temperature decreased, but they had a faster crystallization rate at low temperatures. All the blends’ melts exhibited a predominantly viscous behavior rather than an elastic behavior, but the melt elasticity increased with increasing TPEE content. When the blends crystallized from the melt, the PTT component could form spherulites but their morphology was imperfect with a small size. The blends had larger storage moduli at low temperatures than that of pure PTT.     

The Composition,Sequence Analysis,and Crystallization Characterization of Poly(Trimethylene‐co‐Butylene Terephthalate) Copolymer

A series of poly(trimethylene‐co‐butylene terephthalate) (PTBT) copolymers were prepared by direct esterification followed by polycondensation. The composition and sequence distribution of the copolymers were investigated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The results demonstrate that the synthesized PTBT copolymers are block copolymers and the content of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) units incorporated into the copolymers is always less than that in the polymerization feed. The 1,4‐butanediol consumption by a side reaction leads to a relatively lower content of PBT units in the resultant copolymers. At the same time, the PBT and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) sequence length distributions in the copolymers are different. The PBT segments favor a longer sequence length than do the PTT segments in their corresponding enriched copolymers. The crystallization rate of the copolymers becomes lower than the homopolymers, especially for PTT‐enriched copolymers. Compared with the PTT segment, the presence of PBT segments in the copolymers seems to accelerate crystallization. A wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) analysis indicates PTT and PBT units do not co‐crystallize. The reduced melting temperatures of the copolymers may be attributed to a smaller lamellar thickness and lateral size due to short sequence lengths.     

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Maleic Anhydride Grafted Poly(Ethylene-octene)/Polypropylene Blends

A range of blends based on 70 wt% of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) PTT with 30 wt% dispersed phase were produced via melt blending. The dispersed phase composition was varied from pure maleic anhydride grafted poly(ethylene-octene) (POE-g-MA) over a range of POE-g-MA:polypropylene (PP) ratios. The micromorphology and mechanical properties of the ternary blends were investigated. The results indicated that the domains of the POE-g-MA are dispersed in the PTT matrix, and at the same time the POE-g-MA encapsulate the PP domains. The interfacial reaction between the hydroxyl-end group of PTT and maleic anhydride (MA) during melt blending changes the formation from “isolated formation” to “capsule formation,” where the PP domains are encapsulated by POE-g-MA. Compared to the PTT/POE-g-MA blends, mechanical properties of ternary blends, such as tensile strength and Young's modulus, were improved significantly.     

Reactive Compatibilization of Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Polypropylene Blends by Polypropylene‐graft‐Maleic Anhydride. Part 2. Crystallization Behavior

The crystallization behavior of uncompatibilized and reactive compatibilized poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PTT/PP) blends was investigated. In both blends, PTT and PP crystallization rates were accelerated by the presence of each other, especially at low concentrations. When PP content in the uncompatibilized blends was increased to 50–60 wt%, PTT showed fractionated crystallization; a small PTT crystallization exotherm appeared at ～135°C besides the normal ～175°C exotherm. Above 70 wt% PP, PTT crystallization exotherms disappeared. In contrast, PP in the blends showed crystallization exotherms at 113–121°C for all compositions. When a maleic anhydride‐grafted PP (PP‐g‐MAH) was added as a reactive compatibilizer, the crystallization temperatures (T _c ) of PTT and PP shifted significantly to lower temperatures. The shift of PTT's T _c was larger than that of the PP, suggesting that addition of the PP‐g‐MAH had a larger effect on PTT's crystallization than on PP due to reaction between maleic anhydride and PTT.

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics was analyzed by a modified Avrami equation. The results confirmed that PTT's and PP's crystallization was accelerated by the presence of each other and the effect varied with blend compositions. When the PP content increased from 0 to 60 wt%, PTT's Avrami exponent n decreased from 4.35 to 3.01; nucleation changed from a thermal to an athermal mode with three‐dimensional growths. In contrast, when the PTT content increased from 0 to 90 wt% in the blends, changes in PP's n values indicated that nucleation changed from a thermal (0–50 wt% PTT) to athermal (60–70 wt% PTT) mode, and then back to a thermal (80–90 wt% PTT) mode. When PP‐g‐MAH was added as a compatibilizer, the crystallization process shifted considerably to lower temperatures and it took a longer crystallization time to reach a given crystallinity compared to the uncompatibilized blends.     

Crystallization Behavior of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Polycarbonate Blends

The crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate (PTT) in compatibilized and uncompatibilized PTT/polycarbonate (PC) blends are investigated in the research reported in this paper. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results showed that the crystallization behaviors of PTT/PC blends were very sensitive to PC content. The onset (T_ci) and the peak (T_c) crystallization temperatures shifted to lower temperatures whereas the area of the exotherm decreased quickly as the PC content was increased. The Avrami exponent, n, decreased from 4.32 to 3.61 as the PC content was increased from 0 to 20 wt %, and the growth rate constant, Z _c , decreased gradually as well. This suggests that the nucleation mechanism exhibits the tendency of changing gradually from a thermal nucleation to an athermal mode although the growth mechanism still remains three‐dimensional. When epoxy (2.7 phr) was added as a compatibilizer during melt blending, the T_ci and T_c shifted slightly to higher temperature (≤2°C), and the crystallization enthalpy, however, exhibited an increased crystallinity with the exception of the 90/10/2.7 phr PTT/PC/Epoxy. This suggests that the epoxy make a positive contribution to the PTT crystallization. Moreover, the influences of epoxy on the crystallization behaviors of PTT/PC blends are related to the epoxy content. By contrast, the compatibilizer of ethylene‐propylene‐diene copolymer graft glycidyl methacrylate (EPDM‐g‐GMA, ≤6.3 phr) had little effect on the crystallization behavior of PTT/PC blends. For PTT/PC/Epoxy (2.7 phr) blends, the Avrami exponent, n, decreased to near 3, while the growth rate constant, Z _c , increased slightly as PC content was increased from 0 to 20 wt %. It is suggested that epoxy accelerated the process of the nucleation mechanism changing from thermal nucleation to an athermal mode. The EPDM‐g‐GMA had little effect on the nucleation mode and spherical growth mechanism. The PTT spherulite morphologies in PTT/PC blends were very sensitive to blend composition. Completely different morphologies were observed in pure PTT, PTT/PC, PTT/PC/Epoxy, and PTT/PC/EPDM‐g‐GMA blends.     

Toughened Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate) by Blending with a Functionalized Metallocenic Poly(Ethylene-Octene) Copolymer

New toughened poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) materials were obtained by melt blending with maleic anhydride grafted poly(ethylene-octene) (POEg). Rheological properties, mechanical properties, and morphological characteristics of PTT/POEg blends at four different compositions—95/5, 90/10, 80/20, and 70/30—were studied. The melt viscosity of the blends shows a linear decrease on increasing the POEg content. The addition of rubbery POEg to the PTT matrix increases the impact strength, while tensile properties decrease. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) displayed a very good dispersion of POEg particles in the PTT matrix. Differential scanning colorimetry (DSC) experiments showed that for all samples the melting point was almost constant and the crystallinity did not show obvious differences. SEM results showed shear yielding of the PTT matrix was the major toughening mechanism.     

Effect of Organoclay Platelets on Crystallization of PTT/EPDM-g-MA Blends: Nonisothermal Melt Crystallization Kinetics

PTT/EPDM-g-MA (80/20 w/w) nanocomposites were prepared by melt mixing of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT), ethylene-propylene-diene copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (EPDM-g-MA), and organoclay. The blend nanocomposites show typical sea-island morphologies. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of pure PTT and 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with various amounts of the clay were extensively studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The Avrami, Ozawa, and Mo methods were used to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of pure PTT and 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with various amounts of the clay. Avrami analysis results show that the crystallization rates of 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with the clay were faster than those of pure PTT or PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends without clay, which indicates that the clay particles promote crystallization effectively, in agreement with the Mo analysis results. Ozawa analysis can describe the nonisothermal crystallization of pure PTT very well but was rather inapplicable to the 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with various amounts of the clay.     

Effect of Organoclay Platelets on Crystallization of Polytrimethylene Terephthalate/Polyethylene-octene-g-maleic Anhydride Blends: Isothermal Crystallization

The blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) with maleic anhydride-grafted poly(ethylene-octene) (POE-g-MA) and organoclay (OMMT) were prepared by melt-blending. The effects of organoclay platelets on the isothermal crystallization behaviors of PTT/POE-g-MA blend were examined using differential scanning calorimetry. The crystallization kinetics of the primary stage under isothermal conditions could be described by the Avrami equation, with values of the Avrami exponent between 2.01 and 2.81 for all samples. The crystallization rate parameter, K, decreased with increase of melt-crystallization temperature for all samples. The activation energies for isothermal crystallization were determined by the Arrhenius equation.     

Amorphous structure heat: Heats of solution versus temperature for polysulfone in o-dichlorobenzene

The data presented for polysulfone in o-dichlorobenzene support previous observations on other systems in which the heats of solution decrease linearly with increasing temperature of measurement. Consistent with similar measurements on polycarbonate and polyphenylene oxide, a dramatic slope change from 0.078 cal/g-C° below 120°C to 0.019 cal/g-C° above 120°C occur for the data on polysulfone. The source of these heats is due primarily to the enthalpy difference between the solid polymer and its corresponding liquid amorphous state at the measurement temperature since the heats of mixing are rationalized to be small.     

Mechanical Property,Crystal Morphology,and Nonisothermal Crystallization Kinetics of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Maleinized Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Blends

The mechanical properties, morphology, crystallization, and melting behaviors and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly (trimethylene terephthalate)(PTT)/maleinized acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS-g-MAH) blends were investigated by an impact tester, polarized optical microscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results suggested that the ABS-g-MAH component served as both a nucleating agent for increasing the crystallization rate and as a toughening agent for improving the impact strength of PTT. When the ABS-g-MAH content was 5wt.%, the blend had the best toughness and a high crystallization rate. The blends showed different crystallization rates and subsequent melting behaviors due to their different ABS-g-MAH contents. The Ozawa theory and the method developed by Mo and coworkers were used to study the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends. The kinetic crystallization rate parameters suggested that the proper contents of ABS-g-MAH can highly accelerate the crystallization rate of PTT, but this effect nearly reaches saturation for ABS-g-MAH contents over 5%. The Ozawa exponents calculated from the DSC data suggested that the PTT crystals in the blends have similar growth dimensions as those in neat PTT, although they are smaller and/or imperfect. The effective activation energy calculated by the method developed by Kissinger also indicates that the blends with higher ABS-g-MAH content were easier to crystallize.     

Reactive Compatibilization of Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Polypropylene Blends by Polypropylene‐graft‐Maleic Anhydride. Part 1. Rheology,Morphology, Melting,and Mechanical Properties

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PTT/PP) blends were prepared by melt blending. The rheology, morphology, melting, and mechanical properties of PTT/PP blends were investigated with and without the addition of polypropylene‐graft‐maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH). The melt viscosity results showed that the fluid behavior of PTT/PP blends exhibited great disparity to that of PTT but similar to that of PP; the dispersed flexible PP phase in the blends served as a “ball bearing effect” under shear stress, which made the fluid resistance markedly reduced; by contrast, the relatively rigid PTT dispersed phase made only a small contribution to the viscosity. With 5 wt.% PP‐g‐MAH addition during melt processing, both the shear viscosity and the non‐Newtonian index of 70/30 PTT/PP blend were increased over that of the corresponding uncompatibilized one, whereas the shear viscosity of the 30/70 PTT/PP melt decreased slightly indicating that a considerable amount of PP‐g‐MAH did not act as compatibilizer but probably served as plasticizer.

With the increasing of the other component, the melting temperature of the PTT phase showed a slight decrease while the melting temperature of the PP phase showed a slight increase. 5 wt.% PP‐g‐MAH addition had little influence on the melting temperatures of the two components. When PP≤20 wt.%, the cold crystallization temperature of the PTT phase (T_cc (PTT‐phase)) showed little change with the composition; however, it shifted to higher temperature when PP≥30 wt.%. The variations of the T_cc (PTT‐phase), with and without PP‐g‐MAH, suggested that, when PTT was a minor component, the excess PP‐g‐MAH which did not act as compatibilizer might serve as a plasticizer that made the PTT's cold crystallization process to be easier. The SEM results indicated that, for the uncompatibilized blends, the interfaces from particles pulling‐out are clear and smooth, while, for compatibilized blends, the reactive products are at the interfaces. The mechanical properties suggested that PP‐g‐MAH did not result in significant improvement of the toughness of the blend, but the tensile strength increased markedly.     

Manufacture and Characterization of Poly (butylene terephthalate) Nanofibers by Electrospinning

Poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT) nanofiber mats were prepared by electrospinning, being directly deposited in the form of a random fibers web. The effect of changing processing parameters such as solution concentration and electrospinning voltage on the morphology of the electrospun PBT nanofibers was investigated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The electrospun fibers diameter increased with rising concentration and decreased by increasing the electrospinning voltage, thermal and mechanical properties of electrospun fibers were characterized by DSC and tensile testing, respectively.     

Fabrication of Polypropylene/Poly (Trimethylene Terephthalate) Blend Fibers with Highly Improved Resiliency and Preserved Mechanical Properties

The main aim of this study was to deal with one of the major drawbacks of polypropylene (PP) fibers, i.e. low resiliency, by incorporating poly (trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) nano-fibrils as a dispersed material into the PP polymer matrix. Thanks to the special helical shape of the PTT polymer backbone, the incorporated nano-fibrils of the PTT polymer strengthened the resiliency of the blend fibers. The presence of 10 and 15?wt% of PTT in the blend fibers led to an approximately 20% increase in the resilience behavior, compared to pure PP fibers, with the mechanical properties of the PP matrix preserved. The development of the fibrillar structures during the different steps of the melt spinning process was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the lowest mean diameter of the nano-fibrils was 64?nm for the hot drawn blend fiber samples consisting of 10?wt% of PTT. In summary, we suggest the optimized blend fiber samples produced in this research will be a promising candidate for a wide range of engineering applications.     

Poly(butylene terephthalate) Toughening with Butadiene-Epoxy-Functionalized Methyl Methacrylate Core–Shell Copolymer

Butadiene glycidyl methacrylate-functionalized-methyl methacrylate (PB-g-MG) core–shell copolymer was used to toughen poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and torque tests showed that compatibilization reactions took place between the carboxyl and/or hydroxyl groups of PBT and the epoxy groups of PB-g-MG. Phase morphology results showed that the PB-g-MG core–shell particles dispersed in the PBT matrix uniformly. The addition of PB-g-MG significantly improved the mechanical properties of PBT. The elongation at break and the impact strength increased with the increase of PB-g-MG content. SEM results showed that the shear yielding properties of the PBT matrix was the main toughening mechanism. The relationship between complex viscosity and angular frequency of the PBT/PB-g-MG blends indicated that the melt viscosity was higher than that of pure PBT.