[Cd(STrt)3]–, ein homoleptischer Cadmiumkomplex mit dem sterisch anspruchsvollen Triphenylmethanthiolat‐Liganden

[Cd(STrt)₃]^–, a Homoleptic Cadmium Complex with the Sterically Demanding Triphenylmethanethiolate Ligand Crystalline [K(18‐crown‐6)(THF)₂][Cd(STrt)₃] · 2 THF ( 1 ) has been isolated in 77% yield from the reaction of CdCl₂, KSTrt and 18‐crown‐6 in tetrahydrofuran (THF; Trt = triphenylmethyl). The Cd^II ion of 1 exhibits a distorted trigonal coordination by three thiolate ligands (Cd–S 2.461(2)–2.518(2) Å, S–Cd–S 106.87(5)–135.20(5)°, Cd atom 0.24 Å above the S₃ plane).     

Metallkomplexe mit biologisch wichtigen Liganden. CXLVII [1] Struktur und Eigenschaften von Pfeiffers Nickel(II)‐Schiff‐Base‐Komplex aus Salicylaldehyd und Glycinester

Metal Complexes with Biological Important Ligands. CXLVII [1] Structure and Properties of Pfeiffer's Nickel(II) Schiff Base Complex from Salicylaldehyde and Glycine Ester. The structure of the planar nickel(II) complex reported by Paul Pfeiffer with two Schiff base ligands from salicylaldehyde and glycine ethylester and with trans‐NiO₂N₂ arrangement was determined by X‐ray diffraction. The finding by Pfeiffer that this complex reacts with oxygen to give the bis(O, N‐imine) complex Ni(OC₆H₄CH=NH)₂ under C‐N cleavage could be confirmed by spectroscopic data, and a reaction path is suggested.     

Synthesen zweizähniger P‐Donor/Sn‐Akzeptor‐Liganden: Koordinationsstudien mit Cp*Rh(CO)2 und CpRh(C2H4)2

Alternative Ligands. XXXV. Syntheses of Bidentate P‐Donor/Sn‐Acceptor Ligands: Coordination Experiments with Cp*Rh(CO)₂ and CpRh(C₂H₄)₂ Donor/acceptor ligands Me₂Sn(CH₂CH₂PMe₂)₂ ( 1 ) and Me₂Sn(OCH₂PMe₂)₂ ( 2 ) have been prepared by radical reaction of Me₂PVi with Me₂SnH₂ and by substitution of chlorine in Me₂SnCl₂ or of ethoxy groups in Me₂Sn(OEt)₂ by MOCH₂PMe₂ (M = Li, Na) and HOCH₂PMe₂, respectively. 2 cannot be isolated in pure form from the product mixture because, due to condensation reactions, the “ladder structure” [Me₂Sn(OCH₂PMe₂)₂OSnMe₂]₂ ( 3 ) is formed. The molecular structure of 3 was determined by X‐ray diffraction studies of single crystals. Attempts to produce the thiophosphoryl derivative of 3 result in the degradation of the ladder structure giving the thermally labile phosphane sulfide Me₂Sn(OCH₂P(S)Me₂)₂. Ligands 1 and 2 besides Me₂PCH₂CH₂SnMe₃ ( 4 ) have been used for the preparation of rhodium(I) complexes from Cp*Rh(CO)₂ ( 5 ) or CpRh(C₂H₄)₂ ( 10 ) as educts. The thermal reaction of 5 with 4 yields Cp*Rh(CO)PMe₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₃ ( 6 ), that of 5 with 1 a mixture of the mononuclear derivative Cp*Rh(CO) · PMe₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂CH₂CH₂PMe₂ ( 7 ) and the binuclear complex [Cp*Rh(CO)PMe₂CH₂CH₂]₂SnMe₂ ( 8 ). The related system [Cp*Rh(CO)PMe₂CH₂O]₂SnMe₂ produced by reaction of 5 with 2 can only be detected in solution but, because of some side‐products, was not fully characterized. From 10 and 4 a mixture of mono‐ and disubstituted products, CpRh(C₂H₄)PMe₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₃ ( 11 ) and CpRh(PMe₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₃)₂ ( 12 ), is obtained. Reaction of 1 with 10 yields a mixture of the complexes CpRh(C₂H₄)PMe₂CH₂CH₂SnMe₂CH₂CH₂PMe₂ ( 13 ) and CpRh(Me₂CH₂CH₂)₂SnMe₂ ( 14 ). Some of the NMR data (¹³C, δδ_Sn) of 14 can be interpreted in terms of the expected Rh → Sn interaction. A definite proof by X‐ray diffraction on single crystals, so far, was not possible.     

Umsetzungen der Dielementverbindungen R2E–ER2 [E = Ga,In; R = CH(SiMe3)2] mit Lithium‐phenylethinid – Bildung von Addukten unter Erhalt der E–E‐Bindungen

Reactions of the Dielement Compounds R₂E–ER₂ [E = Ga, In; R = CH(SiMe₃)₂] with Lithium Phenylethynide – Formation of Adducts by Retention of the E–E Bonds Lithium phenylethynide reacted with the dielement compounds tetrakis[bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl]digallane(4) ( 2 ) and diindane(4) ( 3 ) as a Lewis‐base and gave by the addition of one ethynido ligand to one of the Lewis‐acidic central atoms the anionic adducts 4 and 5 with intact Ga–Ga and In–In single bonds. Thus, compounds were formed, in which tricoordinated, coordinatively unsaturated Ga or In atoms are neighbored to tetracoordinated, coordinatively saturated ones. The E–E bonds [255.83 pm in 4 (Ga–Ga) and 285.24 pm in 5 (In–In)] are only slightly lengthened compared to those of the starting compounds 2 and 3 . A dynamic behavior with a fast change of the position of the ethynido ligand was observed for both compounds in solution at room temperature.