Hydrogen‐bonded layers in the 1:2 cocrystal of 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid with isonicotinohydrazide

Cocrystallization of 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid with isonicotinohydrazide from methanol solution yields the 1:2 cocrystal 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid–isonicotinohydrazide (1/2), C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂·2C₆H₇N₃O. The component molecules are linked by intermolecular O—H...N, N—H...O, N—H...N and C—H...O hydrogen bonds into layers running parallel to the (010) plane, and these layers are further linked into a three‐dimensional framework structure by means of weak aromatic π–π stacking interactions. As a potential cocrystallization agent, isonicotinohydrazide may be used for effective and versatile synthetic supramolecular strategies utilizing hydrogen bonding of specific molecular building blocks.     

Copper(II) succinate complexes with 1,2‐di‐4‐pyridylethane and 1,3‐di‐4‐pyridylpropane

The compounds poly[di‐μ₄‐succinato‐μ₂‐1,2‐di‐4‐pyridylethane‐dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂(C₁₂H₁₂N₂)]_n, (I), and poly[di‐μ₄‐succinato‐μ₂‐1,3‐di‐4‐pyridylpropane‐dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₄H₄O₄)₂(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)]_n, (II), exhibit polymeric structures with the dicopper units doubly bridged by bis‐bidentate succinate groups and crosslinked by the separator bis(pyridyl) molecules. In (I), the molecule exhibits a centre of inversion located midway between the core Cu‐dimer atoms and another that relates half of the bis(pyridyl)ethane ligand to the other half. Compound (II) has a similar molecular packing but with a doubled lattice constant and noncentrosymmetric core units. An antiferromagnetic interaction due to the dinuclear copper units was deduced from magnetic subsceptibility measurements, and spin triplet signals were detected in the electron paramagnetic resonance spectra for both compounds.     

Hydrogen‐bonded networks in 1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐2,2‐dimethylpropan‐1‐ol

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₁₂H₁₈O₂, contains two independent molecules. They differ only slightly in conformation but form completely different intermolecular hydrogen‐bonded arrays. One molecule exhibits disorder in the hydroxy group region, but this does not influence the formation of hydrogen bonds. The bulky tert‐butyl group on one side of the carbinol C atom and the benzene ring on the other side promote the formation of discrete dimeric motifs via hydrogen‐bridged hydroxy groups. Dimers are further joined by strong hydroxy–methoxy O—H...O bonds to form chains with dangling alcohol groups. Weaker intermolecular C—H...O interactions mediate the formation of a two‐dimensional network.     

Benzene‐1,4‐diboronic acid–4,4′‐bipyridine–water (1/2/2)

In the presence of water, benzene‐1,4‐diboronic acid (1,4‐bdba) and 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bpy) form a cocrystal of composition (1,4‐bdba)(4,4′‐bpy)₂(H₂O)₂, in which the molecular components are organized in two, so far unknown, cyclophane‐type hydrogen‐bonding patterns. The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₆H₈B₂O₄·2C₁₀H₈N₂·2H₂O, contains two 4,4′‐bpy, two water molecules and two halves of 1,4‐bdba molecules arranged around crystallographic inversion centers. The occurrence of O—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds involving the water molecules and all O atoms of boronic acid gives rise to a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded layer structure that develops parallel to the (01) plane. This supramolecular organization is reinforced by π–π interactions between symmetry‐related 4,4′‐bpy molecules.     

2,2′‐Bi(9,9‐di‐n‐propyl­fluorene)

The central part of the title mol­ecule, C₃₈H₄₂, is planar, all the rings being in the same plane; the lateral chains (excluding H atoms) are also planar, with each pair almost perpendicular to the ring plane. In the dimer, the two alkyl‐substituted fluorene moieties are head‐to‐foot. The mol­ecule is on a special position of the space group, a centre of symmetry.     

Aqua­bis(3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonato)­(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine)ruthenium(II)–acetonitrile–water (1/1/1)

The title compound, [Ru(C₆H₆NO₂)₂(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)(H₂O)]·CH₃CN·H₂O, is a transfer hydrogenation catalyst supported by nitro­gen‐donor ligands. This octa­hedral Ru^II complex features rare monodentate coordination of 3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonate ligands and inter­ligand S(6)S(6) hydrogen bonding. Comparison of the title complex with a structural analog with unsubstituted 2‐pyridonate ligands reveals subtle differences in the orientation of the ligand planes.     

Hydrogen‐bonded 1:1 adduct of 1,1′‐(p‐phenylene)dipyridin‐4(1H)‐one with terephthalic acid

Cocrystallization of 1,1′‐(p‐phenylene)dipyridin‐4(1H)‐one (4,4′‐dpy) and terephthalic acid (tpa) affords the hydrogen‐bonded 1:1 title complex, C₁₆H₁₂N₂O₂·C₈H₆O₄. Both mol­ecules are symmetrically disposed about independent symmetry centers. Strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between tpa carboxyl groups and 4,4′‐dpy carbonyl groups produce one‐dimensional zigzag infinite chains. Each chain is linked to four surrounding chains via weak C—H⋯O inter­actions, resulting in a three‐dimensional mol­ecular framework.     

2,2′‐Spiro­bi(1,3‐benzodi­thiole)

The X‐ray structure analysis of 2,2′‐spiro­bi(1,3‐benzodi­thiole), C₁₃H₈S₄, has been performed. The mol­ecule has crystallographic twofold rotation symmetry, the axis passing through the spiro‐C atom. The four S atoms are arranged around the spiro‐C atom in two almost orthogonal CS₂ planes. However, because of large bending of the two five‐membered rings, close contact is present between two connected C atoms on the benzo group of each 1,3‐benzodi­thiole ring and one S atom on the other 1,3‐benzodi­thiole ring.     

2,2′‐(1,2‐Ethanediyldithio)bis(1,3‐benzothiazole)

In the title compound, C₁₆H₁₂N₂S₄, which is the result of the S‐alkyl­ation reaction of 2‐mercapto­benzo­thia­zole with ethyl­ene dibromide, the planes of the two benzo­thia­zole moieties form a dihedral angle of 3.84 (14)°. The bridging chain moiety, –SCH₂CH₂S–, adopts an antiperiplanar conformation. There are intermolecular S⃛S non‐bonded contacts of 3.6471 (9) Å, which stabilize the crystal packing.     

Hydrogen‐bonded sheets in the 1:1 cocrystal of biphenyl‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid with 2,5‐di‐4‐pyrid­yl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole

The combination of biphenyl‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂bpa) and the bent dipyridyl base 2,5‐di‐4‐pyridyl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole (4‐bpo) in a 1:1 molar ratio leads to the formation of the mol­ecular cocrystal (H₂bpa)·(4‐bpo) or C₁₄H₁₀O₄·C₁₂H₈N₄O. The asymmetric unit contains one‐half of an H₂bpa unit lying across a centre of inversion and one‐half of a 4‐bpo mol­ecule lying across a twofold rotation axis. Inter­molecular O—H⋯N inter­actions connect the acid and base mol­ecules to form a one‐dimensional zigzag chain. Through further weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between adjacent chains, a two‐dimensional sheet‐like supramolecular network is afforded. As an extended analogue of terephthalic acid (H₂tp), the backbone geometry of H₂bpa has an evident influence on the hydrogen‐bonding pattern of the title cocrystal compared with that of (H₂tp)·(4‐bpo).     

Hydro­gen bonding in calcium–tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate–1,3‐di‐4‐pyridyl­urea–methanol (1/2/2/4)

The structure of the supramolecular complex calcium–tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate–1,3‐di‐4‐pyridyl­urea–methanol (1/2/2/4), Ca²⁺·2CF₃SO₃⁻·2C₁₁H₁₀N₄O·4CH₄O, is presented. The Ca²⁺ ion lies on an inversion centre and is octahedrally coordinated by four methanol mol­ecules and two tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate counter‐ions. The molecular packing is dominated by hydrogen‐bonded sheets in the (110) plane which contain R(32) rings; in these rings, significant π–π interactions are observed between inversion‐related 1,3‐di‐4‐pyridyl­urea mol­ecules.     

Hydrogen‐bonded network in biphenyl‐4,4′‐diphosphonic acid

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₂H₁₂O₆P₂, displays two different regions alternating along the a axis: a hydrogen‐bonded region encompassing the end‐positioned phosphonic acid groups and a hydrophobic region formed by the aromatic spacers. The asymmetric unit contains only half of the biphenyl‐4,4′‐diphosphonic acid (4,4′‐bpdp) molecule, which is symmetric with an inversion centre imposed at the mid‐point between the two aromatic rings. The periodic organization of the molecules is controlled by two strong O—H...O interactions between the phosphonic acid sites. Weak C—H...π interactions are established in the aromatic regions.     

Magnesium iodide–4,4′‐bipyridine–water (1/3/4) and strontium iodide–4,4′‐bipyridine–propan‐1‐ol (1/2.5/2)

Both of the title compounds, catena‐poly­[[[tetra­aqua­magnesium(I)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N:N′] diiodide bis(4,4′‐bi­pyridine) solvate], {[Mg(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₄]I₂·2C₁₀H₈N₂}_n, (I), and catena‐poly­[[[μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐bis­[di­iodo­bis­(propan‐1‐ol)­strontium(I)]]‐di‐μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐κ⁴N:N′] bis(4,4′‐bi­pyri­dine) solvate], {[Sr₂I₄(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃(C₃H₈O)₄]·2C₁₀H₈N₂}_n, (II), are one‐dimensional polymers which are single‐ and double‐stranded, respectively, the metal atoms being linked by the 4,4′‐bi­pyridine moieties. The Mg complex, (I), is [cis‐{(H₂O)₄Mg(N‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐N′)_(2/2)}]_(∞|∞)I₂·4,4′‐bi­pyridine and Mg has a six‐coordinate quasi‐octahedral coordination environment. The Sr complex, (II), is isomorphous with its previously defined Ba counterpart [Kepert, Waters & White (1996). Aust. J. Chem. 49 , 117–135], being [(propan‐1‐ol)₂I₂Sr(N‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐N′)_(3/2)]_(∞|∞)·4,4′‐bi­pyridine, with the I atoms trans‐axial in a seven‐coordinate pentagonal–bipyramidal Sr environment.     

Hydrogen‐bonded assemblies in the molecular crystals of 2,2′‐thiodiacetic acid with ethylenediamine and o‐phenylenediamine

Carboxylate molecular crystals have been of interest due to the presence of hydrogen bonding, which plays a significant role in chemical and crystal engineering, as well as in supramolecular chemistry. Acid–base adducts possess hydrogen bonds which increase the thermal and mechanical stability of the crystal. 2,2′‐Thiodiacetic acid (Tda) is a versatile ligand that has been widely explored, employing its multidendate and chelating coordination abilities with many metals; however, charge‐transfer complexes of thiodiacetic acid have not been reported. Two salts, namely ethylenediaminium 2,2′‐thiodiacetate, C₂H₁₀N₂²⁺·C₄H₄O₄S₂²⁻, denoted Tdaen, and 2‐aminoanilinium 2‐(carboxymethylsulfanyl)acetate, C₆H₉N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₄S⁻, denoted Tdaophen, were synthesized and characterized by IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In these salts, Tda reacts with the aliphatic (ethylenediamine) and aromatic (o‐phenylenediamine) diamines, and deprotonates them to form anions with different valencies and different supramolecular networks. In Tdaen, the divalent Tda²⁻ anions form one‐dimensional linear supramolecular chains and these are extended into a three‐dimensional sandwich‐type supramolecular network by interaction with the ethylenediaminium cations. However, in Tdaophen, the monovalent Tda⁻ anions form one‐dimensional zigzag supramolecular chains, which are extended into a three‐dimensional supramolecular network by interaction with the 2‐aminoanilinium cations. Thus, both three‐dimensional structures display different ring motifs. The structures of these diamines, which are influenced by hydrogen‐bonded assemblies in the molecular crystals, are discussed in detail.     

Influence of 1,4‐dioxane solvent inclusion on the crystal structure of 5,5′‐diphenyl‐2,2′‐(p‐phenylene)di‐1,3‐oxazole (POPOP)

Crystallization of 5,5′‐diphenyl‐2,2′‐(p‐phenylene)di‐1,3‐oxazole (POPOP), C₂₄H₁₆N₂O₂, from chloroform or 1,4‐dioxane yielded crystals in pure and solvated forms, respectively. The solvated crystals of POPOP were found to contain 1,4‐dioxane in a strict 1:2 compound–solvent stoichiometry, C₂₄H₁₆N₂O₂·C₄H₈O₂, thus being a defined solvent‐inclusion compound. The crystal system is monoclinic in both cases and the asymmetric unit of the cell contains only half of the molecule (plus one dioxane molecule in the case of the solvated structure), owing to the centrosymmetry of the di‐1,3‐oxazole molecule.     

Hydrogen‐bond patterns in the congruent complex 4‐nitrophenol–acetamide (1/1)

Fusion of 4‐nitrophenol and acetamide in a 1:1 molar ratio gives the title product, C₆H₅NO₃·C₂H₅NO, (III), which has the character of a pure covalently bonded compound, having a high sharp melting point. Complex (III) (m.p. 371.9–372.9 K) can be recrystallized from various solvents and forms eutectics with either acetamide or 4‐nitrophenol. Similar fusion of mixtures of acetamide and 2‐nitrophenol yields no complex similar to (III) and mixtures of acetamide and 3‐nitrophenol produce only a weak low‐melting complex. The significance of this study lies in its demonstration, via graph set analysis, that some of the patterns found individually in crystalline acetamide or 4‐nitrophenol have been preserved in crystals of complex (III), while several higher order graph sets are produced in (III) due to new hydrogen bonds involving the nitro group. In particular, large hydrogen‐bonded rings are formed together with helical chains.     

Supramolecular interactions in a copper(II) 4′‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine complex

The title compound, [4′‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]chlorido(trifluoromethanesulfonato)copper(II), [Cu(CF₃O₃S)Cl(C₂₁H₁₄BrN₃)], is a new copper complex containing a polypyridyl‐based ligand. The Cu^II centre is five‐coordinated in a square‐pyramidal manner by one substituted 2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine ligand, one chloride ligand and a coordinated trifluoromethanesulfonate anion. The Cu—N bond lengths differ by 0.1 Å for the peripheral and central pyridine rings [2.032 (2) (mean) and 1.9345 (15) Å, respectively]. The presence of the trifluoromethanesulfonate anion coordinated to the metal centre allows Br...F halogen–halogen interactions, giving rise to the formation of a dimer about an inversion centre. This work also demonstrates that the rigidity of the ligand allows the formation of other types of nonclassical interactions (C—H...Cl and C—H...O), yielding a three‐dimensional network.     

Cobalt(II) and cobalt(III) complexes with 4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine

4′‐Cyanophenyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (cptpy) was employed as an N,N′,N′′‐tridentate ligand to synthesize the compounds bis[4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]cobalt(II) bis(tetrafluoridoborate) nitromethane solvate, [Co^II(C₂₂H₁₄N₄)₂](BF₄)₂·CH₃NO₂, (I), and bis[4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]cobalt(III) tris(tetrafluoridoborate) nitromethane sesquisolvate, [Co^III(C₂₂H₁₄N₄)₂](BF₄)₃·1.5CH₃NO₂, (II). In both complexes, the cobalt ions occupy a distorted octahedral geometry with two cptpy ligands in a meridional configuration. A greater distortion from octahedral geometry is observed in (I), which indicates a different steric consequence of the constrained ligand bite on the Co^II and Co^III ions. The crystal structure of (I) features an interlocked sheet motif, which differs from the one‐dimensional chain packing style present in (II). The lower dimensionality in (II) can be explained by the disturbance caused by the larger number of anions and solvent molecules involved in the crystal structure of (II). All atoms in (I) are on general positions, and the F atoms of one BF₄⁻ anion are disordered. In (II), one B atom is on an inversion center, necessitating disorder of the four attached F atoms, another B atom is on a twofold axis with ordered F atoms, and the C and N atoms of one nitromethane solvent molecule are on a twofold axis, causing disorder of the methyl H atoms. This relatively uncommon study of analogous Co^II and Co^III complexes provides a better understanding of the effects of different oxidation states on coordination geometry and crystal packing.     

4‐Pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2) and bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate

4‐Hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid cocrystallize as a hydrate, 4‐pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2), 2C₅H₅NO·C₈H₆O₄·2H₂O, from a methanol–water solution. The molecules form a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network resulting in sheets of hydrogen‐bonded molecules that lie parallel to the (10) plane. In contrast, 3‐hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid form the salt bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate, 2C₅H₆NO⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻, giving rise to two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheets extending through the lattice parallel to the (10) plane.