Proton‐transfer and non‐transfer in compounds of quinoline and quinaldic acid with l‐tartaric acid

The structures of two compounds of l ‐tartaric acid with quinoline, viz. the proton‐transfer compound quinolinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate monohydrate, C₉H₈N⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·H₂O, (I), and the anhydrous non‐proton‐transfer adduct with quinaldic acid, bis­(quinolinium‐2‐carboxyl­ate) (2R,3R)‐tar­taric acid, 2C₁₀H₇NO₂·C₄H₆O₆, (II), have been determined at 130 K. Compound (I) has a three‐dimensional honeycomb substructure formed from head‐to‐tail hydrogen‐bonded hydrogen tartrate anions and water mol­ecules. The stacks of π‐bonded quinolinium cations are accommodated within the channels and are hydrogen bonded to it peripherally. Compound (II) has a two‐dimensional network structure based on pseudo‐centrosymmetric head‐to‐tail hydrogen‐bonded cyclic dimers comprising zwitterionic quinaldic acid species which are inter­linked by tartaric acid mol­ecules.     

6‐(2‐Chloro­acetamido)­hexa­noic acid

Crystals of the title compound, C₈H₁₄ClNO₃, belong to the space group Cc and are characterized by an asymmetric unit containing two mol­ecules, both with a twisted conformation. The mol­ecular packing is stabilized by N—H⋯O=C hydrogen bonds between the amide groups of mol­ecules with the same conformation. In addition, hydrogen‐bonded cyclic carboxylic acid dimers are established between mol­ecules with a different conformation. The ClCH₂—CONH bond has a cis conformation in order to favour an intra­molecular Cl⋯HN electrostatic inter­action. Weak intra‐ and inter­molecular CH₂⋯O=C inter­actions are also present.     

(S,S)‐4′′‐Cyano‐7,7′′‐dimethoxy‐3′,6′‐dioxodispiro[indane‐2,2′‐piperazine‐5′,2′′‐indane]‐4‐carboxamide methanol solvate: interrupting the amide‐to‐amide hydrogen‐bonded tape

The title methanol solvate, C₂₄H₂₂N₄O₅·CH₃OH, forms an extended three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structure, assisted by the presence of several good donor and acceptor sites. It shows none of the crystal packing features typically expected of piperazinediones, such as amide‐to‐amide R₂²(8) hydrogen bonding. In this structure the methanol solvent appears to play only a space‐filling role; it is not involved in any hydrogen bonding and instead is disordered over several sites. This study reports, to the best of our knowledge, the first crystal structure of an indane‐containing piperazinedione compound which exhibits a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structure formed by classical (N—H...O and N—H...N) hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the hydrated proton‐transfer salts of isonipecotamide with the dicarboxylic oxalic and adipic acid homologues

The structures of the 1:1 hydrated proton‐transfer compounds of isonipecotamide (piperidine‐4‐carboxamide) with oxalic acid, 4‐carbamoylpiperidinium hydrogen oxalate dihydrate, C₆H₁₃N₂O⁺·C₂HO₄⁻·2H₂O, (I), and with adipic acid, bis(4‐carbamoylpiperidinium) adipate dihydrate, 2C₆H₁₃N₂O⁺·C₆H₈O₄²⁻·2H₂O, (II), are three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded constructs involving several different types of enlarged water‐bridged cyclic associations. In the structure of (I), the oxalate monoanions give head‐to‐tail carboxylic acid O—H...O_carboxyl hydrogen‐bonding interactions, forming C(5) chain substructures which extend along a. The isonipecotamide cations also give parallel chain substructures through amide N—H...O hydrogen bonds, the chains being linked across b and down c by alternating water bridges involving both carboxyl and amide O‐atom acceptors and amide and piperidinium N—H...O_carboxyl hydrogen bonds, generating cyclic R₄³(10) and R₃²(11) motifs. In the structure of (II), the asymmetric unit comprises a piperidinium cation, half an adipate dianion, which lies across a crystallographic inversion centre, and a solvent water molecule. In the crystal structure, the two inversion‐related cations are interlinked through the two water molecules, which act as acceptors in dual amide N—H...O_water hydrogen bonds, to give a cyclic R₄²(8) association which is conjoined with an R₄⁴(12) motif. Further N—H...O_water, water O—H...O_amide and piperidinium N—H...O_carboxyl hydrogen bonds give the overall three‐dimensional structure. The structures reported here further demonstrate the utility of the isonipecotamide cation as a synthon for the generation of stable hydrogen‐bonded structures. The presence of solvent water molecules in these structures is largely responsible for the non‐occurrence of the common hydrogen‐bonded amide–amide dimer, promoting instead various expanded cyclic hydrogen‐bonding motifs.     

Seven 5‐benzylamino‐3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazoles: unexpected isomorphisms,and hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular structures in zero,one and two dimensions

5‐Benzylamino‐3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole, C₂₀H₂₃N₃, (I), and its 5‐[4‐(trifluoromethyl)benzyl]‐, C₂₁H₂₂F₃N₃, (III), and 5‐(4‐bromobenzyl)‐, C₂₀H₂₂BrN₃, (V), analogues, are isomorphous in the space group C2/c, but not strictly isostructural; molecules of (I) form hydrogen‐bonded chains, while those of (III) and (V) form hydrogen‐bonded sheets, albeit with slightly different architectures. Molecules of 3‐tert‐butyl‐5‐(4‐methylbenzylamino)‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole, C₂₁H₂₅N₃, (II), are linked into hydrogen‐bonded dimers by a combination of N—H...π(arene) and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds, while those of 3‐tert‐butyl‐5‐(4‐chlorobenzylamino)‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole, C₂₀H₂₂ClN₃, (IV), form hydrogen‐bonded chains of rings which are themselves linked into sheets by an aromatic π–π stacking interaction. Simple hydrogen‐bonded chains built from a single N—H...O hydrogen bond are formed in 3‐tert‐butyl‐5‐(4‐nitrobenzylamino)‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole, C₂₀H₂₂N₄O₂, (VI), while in 3‐tert‐butyl‐5‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzylamino)‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole, C₂₃H₂₉N₃O₃, (VII), which crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in the space group P, pairs of molecules are linked into two independent centrosymmetric dimers, one generated by a three‐centre N—H...(O)₂ hydrogen bond and the other by a two‐centre N—H...O hydrogen bond.     

Amide hydrogen bonding: control of the molecular and extended structures of two symmetrical pyridine‐2‐carboxamide derivatives

The crystal structures of two symmetrical pyridine‐2‐carboxamides, namely N,N′‐(propane‐1,3‐diyl)bis(pyridine‐2‐carboxamide), C₁₅H₁₆N₄O₂, (I), and N,N′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)bis(pyridine‐2‐carboxamide), C₁₆H₁₈N₄O₂, (II), exhibit extended hydrogen‐bonded sequences involving their amide groups. In (I), conventional bifurcated amide–carbonyl (N—H)...O hydrogen bonding favours the formation of one‐dimensional chains, the axes of which run parallel to [001]. Unconventional bifurcated pyridine–carbonyl C—H...O hydrogen bonding links adjacent one‐dimensional chains to form a `porous' three‐dimensional lattice with interconnected, yet unfilled, voids of 60.6 (2) ų which combine into channels that run parallel to, and include, [001]. 4% of the unit‐cell volume of (I) is vacant. Compound (II) adopts a Z‐shaped conformation with inversion symmetry, and exhibits an extended structure comprising one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chains along [100] in which individual molecules are linked by complementary pairs of amide N—H...O hydrogen bonds. These hydrogen‐bonded chains interlock viaπ–π interactions between pyridine rings of neighbouring molecules to form sheets parallel with (010); each sheet is one Z‐shaped molecule thick and separated from the next sheet by the b‐axis dimension [7.2734 (4) Å].     

Hydrogen‐bond motifs in N‐monosubstituted derivatives of barbituric acid: 5‐allyl‐5‐isopropyl‐1‐methylbarbituric acid (enallylpropymal) and 1,5‐di(but‐2‐enyl)‐5‐ethylbarbituric acid

Both title structures exhibit essentially planar barbiturate rings. The crystal structure of enallylpropymal (5‐allyl‐5‐isopropyl‐1‐methylbarbituric acid), C₁₁H₁₆N₂O₃, is composed of centrosymmetric N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded dimers, while 1,5‐di(but‐2‐enyl)‐5‐ethylbarbituric acid, C₁₄H₂₀N₂O₃, forms N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded helical chains. Each of the ten known crystal structures of closely related N‐monosubstituted derivatives of barbituric acid displays one of the fundamental N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded motifs of the two title structures, i.e. either a dimer or a chain.     

2,2,5,5,8,8‐Hexa­methyl‐2,3,5,6,7,8‐hexa­hydro­imidazo­[1,2‐a]­pyrazine‐3,6‐dione,a bicyclic product of α‐amino­isobutyric acid condensation

The title compound, C₁₂H₁₉N₃O₂, is an unusual product of silica‐catalyzed intermolecular condensation of α‐amino­isobutyric acid. The mol­ecule has three types of C—N bonds: a double bond, a cis‐amide bond and single bonds, two of which are typical and two having intermediate lengths due to π‐electron delocalization between C=N and C=O groups. The cis‐amide moieties interact to form dimers via hydrogen bonds which stack in parallel layers.     

Benzyl 5‐carboxy‐4‐ethyl‐3‐methyl­pyrrole‐2‐carboxyl­ate

In the title compound, C₁₆H₁₇NO₄, the benzyl­oxy­carbonyl group is anti to the pyrrolic N atom. The mol­ecules are joined into head‐to‐head dimers by hydrogen bonds involving the carboxyl­ic acid groups. There is orientational disorder of these groups over two positions with approximately equal occupancy. A weaker hydrogen bond between the pyrrolic N atom and the carbonyl O atom of the benzyl­oxy­carbonyl group joins the dimers into chains running parallel to the [110] direction.     

Synthon preference in a hydrated β‐resorcylic acid structure and its cocrystal with thymine

Multicomponent crystals or cocrystals play a significant role in crystal engineering, the main objective of which is to understand the role of intermolecular interactions and to utilize such understanding in the design of novel crystal structures. Molecules possessing carboxylic acid and amide functional groups are good candidates for forming cocrystals. β‐Resorcylic acid monohydrate, C₇H₆O₄·H₂O, (I), crystallizes in the triclinic space group P with one β‐resorcylic acid molecule and one water molecule in the asymmetric unit. The cocrystal thymine–β‐resorcylic acid–water (1/1/1), C₅H₆N₂O₂·C₇H₆O₄·H₂O, (II), crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pca2₁, with one molecule each of thymine, β‐resorcylic acid and water in the asymmetric unit. All available donor and acceptor atoms in (I) and (II) are utilized for hydrogen bonding. The acid and amide functional groups are well known for the formation of self‐complementary acid–acid and amide–amide homosynthons. In (I), an acid–acid homosynthon is observed, while in (II), an amide–acid heterosynthon is present. In (I), the β‐resorcylic acid molecule exhibits the expected intramolecular S(6) motif between the hydroxy and carbonyl O atoms, and an intermolecular R₂²(8) dimer motif between the carboxylic acid groups; only the former motif is observed in (II). The water solvent molecule in (I) propagates the discrete dimers into two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheets. In (II), thymine and β‐resorcylic acid molecules do not form self‐complementary amide–amide and acid–acid homosynthons; instead, a thymine–β‐resorcylic acid heterosynthon is observed. With the help of the water molecule, this heterosynthon is aggregated into a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network. The absence of thymine base pairing in (II) might be linked to the availability of additional functional groups and the preference of the donor and acceptor hydrogen‐bond combinations.     

2‐{[(4‐Methylphenyl)sulfonyl]amino}phenyl 4‐methylbenzenesulfonate

The title compound, C₂₀H₁₉NO₅S₂, crystallizes as an almost 2:1 mixture of two molecular orientations (described as Orient‐A and Orient‐B). The consequences of these two orientations is the formation of three types of N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded dimers in which the (Orient‐A + Orient‐A) dimers are likely to be the most stable, while the mixed (Orient‐A + Orient‐B) dimers are more frequent. Extra interactions in the form of C—H...O and C—H...π interactions act to further stabilize these dimers and probably allow the less energetically favourable (Orient‐A + Orient‐B) and (Orient‐B + Orient‐B) hydrogen‐bonded dimers to exist by preventing their conversion to (Orient‐A + Orient‐A)‐only hydrogen‐bonded dimers during the crystal‐growth process.     

An analytic potential energy function for the amide–amide and amide–water intermolecular hydrogen bonds in peptides

An analytic potential energy function is proposed and applied to evaluate the amide–amide and amide–water hydrogen‐bonding interaction energies in peptides. The parameters in the analytic function are derived from fitting to the potential energy curves of 10 hydrogen‐bonded training dimers. The analytic potential energy function is then employed to calculate the N? H…O?C, C? H…O?C, N? H…OH₂, and C?O…HOH hydrogen‐bonding interaction energies in amide–amide and amide–water dimers containing N‐methylacetamide, acetamide, glycine dipeptide, alanine dipeptide, N‐methylformamide, N‐methylpropanamide, N‐ethylacetamide and/or water molecules. The potential energy curves of these systems are therefore obtained, including the equilibrium hydrogen bond distances R(O…H) and the hydrogen‐bonding energies. The function is also applied to calculate the binding energies in models of β‐sheets. The calculation results show that the potential energy curves obtained from the analytic function are in good agreement with those obtained from MP2/6‐31+G** calculations by including the BSSE correction, which demonstrate that the analytic function proposed in this work can be used to predict the hydrogen‐bonding interaction energies in peptides quickly and accurately. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2009     

Green chemistry synthesis: 2‐amino‐3‐[(E)‐(2‐pyridyl)methylideneamino]but‐2‐enedinitrile monohydrate and 5‐cyano‐2‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)‐1H‐imidazole‐4‐carboxamide

The title compounds, C₁₀H₉N₅O·H₂O (L1·H₂O) and C₁₆H₁₂N₆O (L2), were synthesized by solvent‐free aldol condensation at room temperature. L1, prepared by grinding picolinaldehyde with 2,3‐diamino‐3‐isocyanoacrylonitrile in a 1:1 molar ratio, crystallized as a monohydrate. L2 was prepared by grinding picolinaldehyde with 2,3‐diamino‐3‐isocyanoacrylonitrile in a 2:1 molar ratio. By varying the conditions of crystallization it was possible to obtain two polymorphs, viz. L2‐I and L2‐II; both crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. They differ in the orientation of one pyridine ring with respect to the plane of the imidazole ring. In L2‐I, this ring is oriented towards and above the imidazole ring, while in L2‐II it is rotated away from and below the imidazole ring. In all three molecules, there is a short intramolecular N—H...N contact inherent to the planarity of the systems. In L1·H₂O, this involves an amino H atom and the C=N N atom, while in L2 it involves an amino H atom and an imidazole N atom. In the crystal structure of L1·H₂O, there are N—H...O and O—H...O intermolecular hydrogen bonds which link the molecules to form two‐dimensional networks which stack along [001]. These networks are further linked via intermolecular N—H...N(cyano) hydrogen bonds to form an extended three‐dimensional network. In the crystal structure of L2‐I, symmetry‐related molecules are linked via N—H...N hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of dimers centred about inversion centres. These dimers are further linked via N—H...O hydrogen bonds involving the amide group, also centred about inversion centres, to form a one‐dimensional arrangement propagating in [100]. In the crystal structure of L2‐II, the presence of intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds involving the amide group results in the formation of dimers centred about inversion centres. These are linked via N—H...N hydrogen bonds involving the second amide H atom and the cyano N atom, to form two‐dimensional networks in the bc plane. In L2‐I and L2‐II, C—H...π and π–π interactions are also present.     

2,4,4‐Tri­methyl‐2‐phenyl‐3‐pentanone oxime

The title compound, C₁₄H₂₁NO, has two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Each mol­ecule forms hydrogen‐bonded dimers about inversion centers via O—H?N hydrogen bonds between oxime groups. The N—O distances in the oxime groups are 1.4160 (15) and 1.4131 (14) Å.     

The twinned crystal structure of rac‐(R,R)‐N,N′‐oxalyl­divalinol

The title compound, rac‐(R,R)‐N,N′‐bis(1‐hydroxy‐3‐methyl‐2‐butyl)oxalamide, C₁₂H₂₄N₂O₄, crystallizes as a non‐merohedral twin in the triclinic space group . The twin is generated by a twofold rotation about c*. The terminal hydroxy groups of molecules related by an inversion center form hydrogen‐bonded dimers. This hydrogen‐bonding pattern is further extended into a one‐dimensional chain by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

3,5‐Dichloro‐4‐cyano­benzoic acid: two polymorphs and the 0.25‐hydrate,exhibiting two‐dimensional ribbons and nets involving hydrogen‐bonding and inter­molecular Cl⋯N inter­actions

Two polymorphs of 3,5‐dichloro‐4‐cyano­benzoic acid, C₈H₃Cl₂NO₂, viz. triclinic and monoclinic, and its 0.25‐hydrate, C₈H₃Cl₂NO₂·0.25H₂O, form crystals in which hydrogen bonding and Cl⋯N inter­actions appear to be equally important to the structures. In all three structures, there are hydrogen‐bonded (COOH) dimers of the well known cyclic type, but in the hydrate there are also dimers in which the two opposing COOH groups are separated by a water mol­ecule. In the monoclinic polymorph and in the hydrate, the inter­molecular inter­actions form two‐dimensional nets inter­woven three at a time. For both the triclinic and monoclinic polymorphs, Z′= 2.     

6‐(1‐Hydro­xy‐2,2‐di­phenyl­ethyl)‐4,4‐di­phenyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₃₂H₂₈O₂, (I), confirms the erythro stereochemistry of the aldol adduct. In the crystal, (I) forms centrosymmetric O—H?O=C hydrogen‐bonded dimers which in turn are connected by C—H?O and C—H?π interactions.     

rac‐(Z)‐Ethyl 2‐bromo‐2‐[(3R,5R)‐3‐bromo‐5‐methyl­tetra­hydro­furan‐2‐yl­idene]acetate

In the title compound, C₉H₁₂Br₂O₃, a (tetra­hydro­furan‐2‐yl­idene)acetate, the double bond has the Z form. In the tetra­hydro­furan group, the relative configuration of the Br atom in the 3‐position and the methyl group in the 5‐position is anti. The compound crystallizes with two independent mol­ecules per asymmetric unit and, in the crystal structure, the individual mol­ecules are linked to their symmetry‐equivalent mol­ecules by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, so forming centrosymmetric hydrogen‐bonded dimers.     

cis‐(6RS,13RS)‐3,3,10,10‐Tetra­methyl‐6,13‐diphenyl‐1,8‐dioxa‐4,11‐diaza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐2,5,9,12‐tetra­one and two of its precursors

The title macrocycle, C₂₆H₃₀N₂O₆, (VI), was obtained by `direct amide cyclization' from the linear precursor 3‐hydr­oxy‐N‐[1‐methyl‐1‐(N‐methyl‐N‐phenyl­carbamoyl)ethyl]‐2‐phenylpropanamide, the N‐methyl­anilide of rac‐2‐methyl‐2‐[(3‐hydroxy‐2‐phenyl­propanoyl)­amino]­propanoic acid, C₁₃H₁₇NO₄, (IV). The reaction proceeds via the inter­mediate rac‐2‐(2‐hydroxy‐1‐phenyl­ethyl)‐4,4‐dimethyl‐1,3‐oxazol‐5(4H)‐one, C₁₃H₁₅NO₃, (V), which was synthesized independently and whose structure was also established. Unlike all previously described analogues, the title macrocycle has the cis‐diphenyl configuration. The 14‐membered ring has a distorted rect­angular diamond‐based [3434] configuration and inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into a three‐dimensional framework. The propanoic acid precursor forms a complex series of inter­molecular hydrogen bonds, each of which involves pairwise association of mol­ecules and which together result in the formation of extended two‐dimensional sheets. The oxazole inter­mediate forms centrosymmetric hydrogen‐bonded dimers in the solid state.     

Intermolecular contacts in the crystal packing of 2,2′‐(N,N′‐oxalyldiimino)­bis(3‐phenyl­propanamide) di­methyl sulfoxide solvate

In the title compound, C₂₀H₂₂N₄O₄·C₂H₆OS, two distinct hydrogen‐bond systems connect oxal­amide groups in one pattern and primary amide groups in the other to form a two‐dimensional network perpendicular to the c axis. These hydro­philic layers are joined to the three‐dimensional structure through C—H?π interactions. The hydrogen‐bonded waved layers shape holes which are occupied by disordered di­methyl sulfoxide solvent mol­ecules.