Biphenyl‐ and phenylnaphthalenyl‐substituted 1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarbonitrile catalysts for the coupling reaction of nucleoside methyl phosphonamidites

Crystal structures are reported for three substituted 1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarbonitrile compounds used as catalysts for the coupling reaction of nucleoside methyl phosphonamidites, namely 2‐(3′,5′‐dimethylbiphenyl‐2‐yl)‐1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarbonitrile, C₁₉H₁₄N₄, (I), 2‐(2′,4′,6′‐trimethylbiphenyl‐2‐yl)‐1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarbonitrile, C₂₀H₁₆N₄, (II), and 2‐[8‐(3,5‐dimethylphenyl)naphthalen‐1‐yl]‐1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarbonitrile, C₂₃H₁₆N₄, (III). The asymmetric unit of (I) contains two independent molecules with similar conformations. There is steric repulsion between the imidazole group and the terminal phenyl group in all three compounds, resulting in the nonplanarity of the molecules. The naphthalene group of (III) shows significant deviation from planarity. The C—N bond lengths in the imidazole rings range from 1.325 (2) to 1.377 (2) Å. The molecules are connected into zigzag chains by intermolecular N—H...N_imidazole [for (I)] or N—H...·N_cyano [for (II) and (III)] hydrogen bonds.     

Four 2‐amino‐6‐aryl‐4‐methoxy‐11H‐pyrimido[4,5‐b][1,4]benzodiazepines: similar molecular structures but different crystal structures

2‐Amino‐4‐methoxy‐6‐phenyl‐11H‐pyrimido[4,5‐b][1,4]benzodiazepine, C₁₈H₁₅N₅O, (I), and its 6‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐, 6‐(3‐nitrophenyl)‐ and 6‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐ analogues, viz. C₁₈H₁₄FN₅O, (II), C₁₈H₁₄N₆O₃, (III), and C₁₉H₁₇N₅O₂, (IV), respectively, all adopt molecular conformations which are almost identical, containing boat‐shaped seven‐membered rings. In each structure, paired N—H...N hydrogen bonds link the molecules into centrosymmetric dimers. In each of (I)–(III), the dimers are further linked, forming a different three‐dimensional framework in each case, while in compound (IV) the dimers are linked into sheets. The significance of this study lies in the observation of different crystal structures in four compounds whose molecular structures are very similar.     

Cyclic and acyclic products from the reactions between methyl 3‐oxobutanoate and arylhydrazines

The molecules of methyl 3‐(2‐nitrophenylhydrazono)butanoate, C₁₁H₁₃N₃O₄, (I), and methyl 3‐(2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazono)butanoate, C₁₁H₁₂N₄O₆, (II), both prepared from methyl 3‐oxobutanoate and the corresponding nitrophenylhydrazine, exhibit polarized molecular electronic structures; in each of (I) and (II), the molecules are linked into chains by a single C—H...O hydrogen bond. The molecules of 5‐hydroxy‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole, C₁₀H₁₀N₂O, (III), prepared by the reaction of methyl 3‐oxobutanoate and phenylhydrazine, are linked into chains by a single O—H...N hydrogen bond. The reaction between methyl 3‐oxobutanoate and 3‐nitrophenylhydrazine yields 5‐hydroxy‐3‐methyl‐1‐(3‐nitrophenyl)‐1H‐pyrazole, (IV), which when crystallized from acetone yields 4‐isopropylidene‐3‐methyl‐1‐(3‐nitrophenyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐5(4H)‐one, C₁₃H₁₃N₃O₃, (V).     

Four‐ and five‐coordinate copper(II) complexes with N‐(4,4‐diphenyl‐5‐oxo‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)glycine

The two title mononuclear compounds are four‐coordinate bis[N‐(5‐oxo‐4,4‐diphenyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)glycinato]copper(II) dimethylformamide disolvate, [Cu(C₁₇H₁₄N₃O₃)₂]·2C₃H₇NO, (I), and five‐coordinate aquabis[N‐(5‐oxo‐4,4‐diphenyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)glycinato]copper(II) dimethylformamide disolvate, [Cu(C₁₇H₁₄N₃O₃)₂(H₂O)]·2C₃H₇NO, (II). In (I), the Cu^II ion lies on an inversion centre with one‐half of the complex molecule in the asymmetric unit, while in (II) there are two independent ligand molecules in the asymmetric unit, with the Cu^II ion and coordinated water molecule located on a general position. In both crystal structures, the complex molecules assemble in ribbons via N—H...O hydrogen‐bond networks.     

Models for potential dendritic nitric oxide donors: crystal structures of two 2‐nitroanilino precursors and nitric oxide‐release behavior of the nitrosated derivatives

Two molecular precursors to dendrimeric materials that could serve as slow and sustained NO‐releasing therapeutic agents have been synthesized and characterized. N¹,N⁴‐Bis(2‐nitrophenyl)butane‐1,4‐diamine, C₁₆H₁₈N₄O₄, (I), crystallizes in a lattice with equal populations of two molecules of different conformations, both of which possess inversion symmetry through the central C—C bond. One molecule has exclusively anti conformations along the butyl chain, while the other has a gauche conformation of the substituents on the first C—C bond. N²,N²‐Bis[2‐(2‐nitroanilino)ethyl]‐N¹‐(2‐nitrophenyl)ethane‐1,2‐diamine, C₂₄H₂₇N₇O₆, (II), crystallizes with one unique molecule in the asymmetric unit. Neighboring pairs of molecules are linked into dimers via N—H…O amine–nitro hydrogen bonds. The dimers are assembled into layers that stack in an A–B–A–B sequence such that the repeat distance in the stacking direction is over 46 Å. Molecular NO‐release agents N¹,N⁴‐bis(2‐nitrophenyl)‐N¹,N⁴‐dinitrosobutane‐1,4‐diamine, C₁₆H₁₆N₆O₆, (III), and N¹‐(2‐nitrophenyl)‐N²,N²‐bis{2‐[(2‐nitrophenyl)(nitroso)amino]ethyl}‐N¹‐nitrosoethane‐1,2‐diamine, C₂₄H₂₄N₁₀O₉, (IV), were prepared via treatment of (I) and (II), respectively, with NaNO₂ and acetic acid. The release of NO from solid‐phase samples of (III) and (IV) suspended in phosphate buffer was monitored spectroscopically over a period of 21 days. Although (IV) released a greater amount of NO, as expected due to it having three NO moieties for every two in (III), the (IV):(III) ratio of the rate and extent of NO release was significantly less than 1.5:1, suggesting that some combination of electronic, chemical, and/or steric factors may be affecting the release process.     

Low‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 and 1:2 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the aliphatic Lewis bases triethylamine,diethylamine, n‐butylamine and piperidine

The structures of the proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid (DCPA) with the aliphatic Lewis bases triethylamine, diethylamine, n‐butylamine and piperidine, namely triethylaminium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₆H₁₆N⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (I), diethylaminium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₄H₁₂N⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II), bis(butanaminium) 4,5‐dichlorobenzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate monohydrate, 2C₄H₁₂N⁺·C₈H₂Cl₂O₄²⁻·H₂O, (III), and bis(piperidinium) 4,5‐dichlorobenzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate monohydrate, 2C₅H₁₂N⁺·C₈H₂Cl₂O₄²⁻·H₂O, (IV), have been determined at 200 K. All compounds have hydrogen‐bonding associations, giving discrete cation–anion units in (I) and linear chains in (II), while (III) and (IV) both have two‐dimensional structures. In (I), a discrete cation–anion unit is formed through an asymmetric R₁²(4) N⁺—H...O₂ hydrogen‐bonding association, whereas in (II), chains are formed through linear N—H...O associations involving both aminium H‐atom donors. In compounds (III) and (IV), the primary N—H...O‐linked cation–anion units are extended into a two‐dimensional sheet structure via amide–carboxyl N—H...O and amide–carbonyl N—H...O interactions. In the 1:1 salts (I) and (II), the hydrogen 4,5‐dichlorophthalate anions are essentially planar with short intramolecular carboxyl–carboxyl O—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.4223 (14) and 2.388 (2) Å, respectively]. This work provides a further example of the uncommon zero‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded DCPA–Lewis base salt and the one‐dimensional chain structure type, while even with the hydrate structures of the 1:2 salts with the primary and secondary amines, the low dimensionality generally associated with 1:1 DCPA salts is also found.     

Substituent position effect on the crystal structures of N‐phenyl‐2‐phthalimidoethanesulfonamide derivatives

In order to determine the impact of different substituents and their positions on intermolecular interactions and ultimately on the crystal packing, unsubstituted N‐phenyl‐2‐phthalimidoethanesulfonamide, C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₄S, (I), and the N‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐, C₁₆H₁₃N₃O₆S, (II), N‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐, C₁₆H₁₆N₃O₆S, (III), and N‐(2‐ethylphenyl)‐, as the monohydrate, C₁₈H₁₈N₂O₄S·H₂O, (IV), derivatives have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. Sulfonamides (I) and (II) have triclinic crystal systems, while (III) and (IV) are monoclinic. Although the molecules differ from each other only with respect to small substituents and their positions, they crystallized in different space groups as a result of differing intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen‐bond interactions. The structures of (I), (II) and (III) are stabilized by intermolecular N—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds, while that of (IV) is stabilized by intermolecular O—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds. All four structures are of interest with respect to their biological activities and have been studied as part of a program to develop anticonvulsant drugs for the treatment of epilepsy.     

trans‐Diaquabis(1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐di­carboxyl­ate‐κ2N3,O4)­manganese(II)

In the title compound, [Mn(C₅H₃N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂], the Mn^II atom lies on an inversion centre, is trans‐coordinated by two N,O‐bidentate 1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐di­carboxyl­ate monoanionic ligands [Mn—O = 2.202 (3) Å and Mn—N = 2.201 (4) Å] and two water mol­ecules [Mn—O = 2.197 (4) Å], and exhibits a distorted octahedral geometry, with adjacent cis angles of 76.45 (13), 86.09 (13) and 89.20 (13)°. The complete solid‐state structure can be described as a three‐dimensional supramol­ecular framework, stabilized by extensive hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving the coordinated water mol­ecules, the carboxy O atoms and the protonated imidazole N atoms of the imidazole‐4,5‐di­carboxyl­ate ligands.     

Four cocrystals of thymine with phenolic coformers: influence of the coformer on hydrogen bonding

Cocrystals are molecular solids composed of at least two types of neutral chemical species held together by noncovalent forces. Crystallization of thymine [systematic name: 5‐methylpyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione] with four phenolic coformers resulted in cocrystal formation, viz. catechol (benzene‐1,2‐diol) giving thymine–catechol (1/1), C₅H₆N₂O₂·C₆H₆O₂, (I), resorcinol (benzene‐1,3‐diol) giving thymine–resorcinol (2/1), 2C₅H₆N₂O₂·C₆H₆O₂, (II), hydroquinone (benzene‐1,4‐diol) giving thymine–hydroquinone (2/1), 2C₅H₆N₂O₂·C₆H₆O₂, (III), and pyrogallol (benzene‐1,2,3‐triol) giving thymine–pyrogallol (1/2), C₅H₆N₂O₂·2C₆H₆O₃, (IV). The resorcinol molecule in (II) occupies a twofold axis, while the hydroquinone molecule in (III) is situated on a centre of inversion. Thymine–thymine base pairing is common across all four structures, albeit with different patterns. In (I)–(III), the base pair is propagated into an infinite one‐dimensional ribbon, whereas it exists as a discrete dimeric unit in (IV). In (I)–(III), the two donor N atoms and one carbonyl acceptor O atom of thymine are involved in thymine–thymine base pairing and the remaining carbonyl O atom is hydrogen bonded to the coformer. In contrast, in (IV), just one donor N atom and one acceptor O atom are involved in base pairing, and the remaining donor N atom and acceptor O atom of thymine form hydrogen bonds to the coformer molecules. Thus, the utilization of the donor and acceptor atoms of thymine in the hydrogen bonding is influenced by the coformers.     

N—H...O and N—H...N interactions in three pyran derivatives

The three pyran structures 6‐methylamino‐5‐nitro‐2,4‐diphenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile, C₁₉H₁₅N₃O₃, (I), 4‐(3‐fluorophenyl)‐6‐methylamino‐5‐nitro‐2‐phenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile, C₁₉H₁₄FN₃O₃, (II), and 4‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐6‐methylamino‐5‐nitro‐2‐phenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile, C₁₉H₁₄ClN₃O₃, (III), differ in the nature of the aryl group at the 4‐position. The heterocyclic ring in all three structures adopts a flattened boat conformation. The dihedral angle between the pseudo‐axial phenyl substituent and the flat part of the pyran ring is 89.97 (1)° in (I), 80.11 (1)° in (II) and 87.77 (1)° in (III). In all three crystal structures, a strong intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond links the flat conjugated H—N—C=C—N—O fragment into a six‐membered ring. In (II), molecules are linked into dimeric aggregates by N—H... O(nitro) hydrogen bonds, generating an R₂²(12) graph‐set motif. In (III), intermolecular N—H...N and C—H...N hydrogen bonds link the molecules into a linear chain pattern generating C(8) and C(9) graph‐set motifs, respectively.     

trans‐Di­aqua­bis(5‐carboxy‐1H‐imidazole‐4‐carboxyl­ato‐κ2N3,O4)­cobalt(II) 4,4′‐bi­pyridine solvate

In the title compound, [Co(C₅H₃N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂]·C₁₀H₈N₂, the Co atom is trans‐coordinated by two pairs of N and O atoms from two monoanionic 4,5‐di­carboxy­imidazole ligands, and by two O atoms from two coordinated water mol­ecules, in a distorted octahedral geometry. The 4,4′‐bi­pyridine solvent molecule is not involved in coordination but is linked by an N—H⋯N hydrogen bond to the neutral [Co(C₅H₃N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂] mol­ecule. Both mol­ecules are located on inversion centers. The crystal packing is stabilized by N—H⋯N and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, which produce a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network. Offset π–π stacking interactions between the pyridine rings of adjacent 4,4′‐bi­pyridine molecules were observed, with a face‐to‐face distance of 3.345 (1) Å.     

Dimeric copper(II) 3,3‐dimethyl­butyrate adducts with ethanol, 2‐methylpyridine, 3‐methylpyridine, 4‐methylpyridine and 3,3‐dimethylbutyric acid

In the crystals of the five title compounds, tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(ethanol‐O)dicopper(II)–ethanol (1/2), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₂H₆O)₂]·2C₂H₆O, (I), tetrakis(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(2‐methylpyridine‐N)di­copper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (II), tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(3‐methylpyridine‐N)di‐copper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (III), tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(4‐methylpyridine‐N)di‐copper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₇N)₂], (IV), and tetrakis‐(μ‐3,3‐dimethylbutyrato‐O:O′)bis(3,3‐dimethylbutyric acid‐O)dicopper(II), [Cu₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₄(C₆H₁₂O₂)₂], (V), the di­nuclear Cu^II complexes all have centrosymmetric cage structures and (IV) has two independent molecules. The Cu?Cu separations are: (I) 2.602 (3) Å, (II) 2.666 (3) Å, (III) 2.640 (2) Å, (IV) 2.638 (4) Å and (V) 2.599 (1) Å.     

Six two‐ and three‐component ammonium carboxylate salt structures with a ladder‐type hydrogen‐bonding motif,three incorporating neutral carboxylic acid molecules

Six ammonium carboxylate salts are synthesized and reported, namely 2‐propylammonium benzoate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻, (I), benzylammonium (R)‐2‐phenylpropionate, C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₉H₉O₂⁻, (II), (RS)‐1‐phenylethylammonium naphthalene‐1‐carboxylate, C₈H₁₂N⁺·C₁₁H₇O₂⁻, (III), benzylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (IV), cyclopropylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₃H₈N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (V), and cyclopropylammonium–ea‐cis‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylate–ee‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid (2/1/1), 2C₃H₈N⁺·C₈H₁₀O₄²⁻·C₈H₁₂O₄, (VI). Salts (I)–(III) all have a 1:1 ratio of cation to anion and feature three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds which form one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded ladders. Salts (I) and (II) have type II ladders, consisting of repeating R₄³(10) rings, while (III) has type III ladders, in this case consisting of alternating R₄²(8) and R₄⁴(12) rings. Salts (IV) and (V) have a 1:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to benzoic acid. They have type III ladders formed by three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds, while the benzoic acid molecules are pendant to the ladders and hydrogen bond to them via O—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds. Salt (VI) has a 2:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to acid and does not feature any hydrogen‐bonded ladders; instead, the ionized and un‐ionized components form a three‐dimensional network of hydrogen‐bonded rings. The two‐component 1:1 salts are formed from a 1:1 ratio of amine to acid. To create the three‐component salts (IV)–(VI), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced so as to deprotonate only half of the acid molecules, and then to observe how the un‐ionized acid molecules are incorporated into the ladder motif. For (IV) and (V), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced to 1:2, while for (VI) the ratio of amine to acid required to deprotonate only half the diacid molecules was 1:1.     

Three sterically hindered 6‐amino‐5‐cyano‐2‐methyl‐4‐(1‐naphthyl)‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carboxylate derivatives

In the title compounds, 2‐methoxyethyl 6‐amino‐5‐cyano‐2‐methyl‐4‐(1‐naphthyl)‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carboxylate, C₂₁H₂₀N₂O₄, (II), isopropyl 6‐amino‐5‐cyano‐2‐methyl‐4‐(1‐naphthyl)‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carboxylate, C₂₁H₂₀N₂O₃, (III), and ethyl 6‐amino‐5‐cyano‐2‐methyl‐4‐(1‐naphthyl)‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carboxylate, C₂₀H₁₈N₂O₃, (IV), the heterocyclic pyran ring adopts a flattened boat conformation. In (II) and (III), the carbonyl group and a double bond of the heterocyclic ring are mutually anti, but in (IV) they are mutually syn. The ester O atoms in (II) and (III) and the carbonyl O atom in (IV) participate in intramolecular C—H...O contacts to form six‐membered rings. The dihedral angles between the naphthalene substituent and the closest four atoms of the heterocyclic ring are 73.3 (1), 71.0 (1) and 74.3 (1)° for (II)–(IV), respectively. In all three structures, only one H atom of the NH₂ group takes part in N—H...O [in (II) and (III)] or N—H...N [in (IV)] intermolecular hydrogen bonds, and chains [in (II) and (III)] or dimers [in (IV)] are formed. In (II), weak intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...N hydrogen bonds, and in (III) intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds link the chains into ladders along the a axis.     

Structural similarities among eight benzoylhydrazones

The crystal structures of eight benzoylhydrazones with different substituents have been investigated, namely 1‐benzoyl‐2‐(propan‐2‐ylidene)hydrazone, C₁₀H₁₂N₂O, (I), 1‐benzoyl‐2‐(1‐cyclohexylethylidene)hydrazone, C₁₅H₂₀N₂O, (II), 1‐benzoyl‐2‐[1‐(naphthalen‐2‐yl)ethylidene]hydrazone, C₁₉H₁₆N₂O, (III), 1‐benzoyl‐2‐(1‐cyclohexylbenzylidene)hydrazone, C₂₀H₂₂N₂O, (IV), 1‐benzoyl‐2‐(1‐phenylbenzylidene)hydrazone, C₂₀H₁₆N₂O, (V), 1‐benzoyl‐2‐[1‐(4‐chlorophenyl)benzylidene]hydrazone, C₂₀H₁₅ClN₂O, (VI), 1‐benzoyl‐2‐(4‐hydroxybenzylidene)hydrazone methanol monosolvate, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₂·CH₃OH, (VII), and 1‐benzoyl‐2‐(1,1‐diphenylpropan‐2‐ylidene)hydrazone, C₂₂H₂₀N₂O, (VIII). The ten molecules in the eight crystal structures [there are two independent molecules in the structures of (V) and (VI)] show similar conformations and hydrogen‐bonding patterns. The C=N—NH—C=O group is planar, but the plane of the phenyl ring of the benzoyl group is rotated by about 30° with respect to that of the keto group [except for (IV), where the groups are coplanar]. Only in the amide group of (VIII) is the N—H group syn to the C=O bond, whereas the seven other compounds exhibit the anti conformation. Unless prevented by steric hindrance, N—H...O hydrogen bonds help to stabilize the crystal structure, which leads to infinite chains or dimers depending upon the molecular conformation. The molecular packing is supported by intermolecular C—H...O interactions. In the crystal structure of (VII), the methanol solvent molecule participates in two strong hydrogen bonds and two weak C—H...O interactions, thus acting as a link between the molecular chains.     

1,3‐Bis(ethylamino)‐2‐nitrobenzene, 1,3‐bis(n‐octylamino)‐2‐nitrobenzene and 4‐ethylamino‐2‐methyl‐1H‐benzimidazole

1,3‐Bis(ethylamino)‐2‐nitrobenzene, C₁₀H₁₅N₃O₂, (I), and 1,3‐bis(n‐octylamino)‐2‐nitrobenzene, C₂₂H₃₉N₃O₂, (II), are the first structurally characterized 1,3‐bis(n‐alkylamino)‐2‐nitrobenzenes. Both molecules are bisected though the nitro N atom and the 2‐C and 5‐C atoms of the ring by twofold rotation axes. Both display intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the amine and nitro groups, but no intermolecular hydrogen bonding. The nearly planar molecules pack into flat layers ca 3.4 Å apart that interact by hydrophobic interactions involving the n‐alkyl groups rather than by π–π interactions between the rings. The intra‐ and intermolecular interactions in these molecules are of interest in understanding the physical properties of polymers made from them. Upon heating in the presence of anhydrous potassium carbonate in dimethylacetamide, (I) and (II) cyclize with formal loss of hydrogen peroxide to form substituted benzimidazoles. Thus, 4‐ethylamino‐2‐methyl‐1H‐benzimidazole, C₁₀H₁₃N₃, (III), was obtained from (I) under these reaction conditions. Compound (III) contains two independent molecules with no imposed internal symmetry. The molecules are linked into chains via N—H...N hydrogen bonds involving the imidazole rings, while the ethylamino groups do not participate in any hydrogen bonding. This is the first reported structure of a benzimidazole derivative with 4‐amino and 2‐alkyl substituents.     

Conversion of 3‐amino‐4‐arylamino‐1H‐isochromen‐1‐ones to 1‐arylisochromeno[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazol‐5(1H)‐ones: synthesis,spectroscopic characterization and the structures of four products and one ring‐opened derivative

An efficient synthesis of 1‐arylisochromeno[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazol‐5(1H)‐ones, involving the diazotization of 3‐amino‐4‐arylamino‐1H‐isochromen‐1‐ones in weakly acidic solution, has been developed and the spectroscopic characterization and crystal structures of four examples are reported. The molecules of 1‐phenylisochromeno[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazol‐5(1H)‐one, C₁₅H₉N₃O₂, (I), are linked into sheets by a combination of C—H…N and C—H…O hydrogen bonds, while the structures of 1‐(2‐methylphenyl)isochromeno[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazol‐5(1H)‐one, C₁₆H₁₁N₃O₂, (II), and 1‐(3‐chlorophenyl)isochromeno[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazol‐5(1H)‐one, C₁₅H₈ClN₃O₂, (III), each contain just one hydrogen bond which links the molecules into simple chains, which are further linked into sheets by π‐stacking interactions in (II) but not in (III). In the structure of 1‐(4‐chlorophenyl)isochromeno[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazol‐5(1H)‐one, (IV), isomeric with (III), a combination of C—H…O and C—H…π(arene) hydrogen bonds links the molecules into sheets. When compound (II) was exposed to a strong acid in methanol, quantitative conversion occurred to give the ring‐opened transesterification product methyl 2‐[4‐hydroxy‐1‐(2‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐5‐yl]benzoate, C₁₇H₁₅N₃O₃, (V), where the molecules are linked by paired O—H…O hydrogen bonds to form centrosymmetric dimers.     

Proton‐transfer compounds of isonipecotamide with the aromatic dicarboxylic acids 4‐nitrophthalic, 4,5‐dichlorophthalic, 5‐nitroisophthalic and terephthalic acid

The structures of the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of isonipecotamide (piperidine‐4‐carboxamide) with 4‐nitrophthalic acid [4‐carbamoylpiperidinium 2‐carboxy‐4‐nitrobenzoate, C₆H₁₃N₂O₈⁺·C₈H₄O₆⁻, (I)], 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid [4‐carbamoylpiperidinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₆H₁₃N₂O₈⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II)] and 5‐nitroisophthalic acid [4‐carbamoylpiperidinium 3‐carboxy‐5‐nitrobenzoate, C₆H₁₃N₂O₈⁺·C₈H₄O₆⁻, (III)], as well as the 2:1 compound with terephthalic acid [bis(4‐carbamoylpiperidinium) benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate dihydrate, 2C₆H₁₃N₂O₈⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻·2H₂O, (IV)], have been determined at 200 K. All salts form hydrogen‐bonded structures, viz. one‐dimensional in (II) and three‐dimensional in (I), (III) and (IV). In (I) and (III), the centrosymmetric R₂²(8) cyclic amide–amide association is found, while in (IV) several different types of water‐bridged cyclic associations are present [graph sets R₄²(8), R₄³(10), R₄⁴(12), R₃³(18) and R₆⁴(22)]. The one‐dimensional structure of (I) features the common `planar' hydrogen 4,5‐dichlorophthalate anion, together with enlarged cyclic R₃³(13) and R₄³(17) associations. In the structures of (I) and (III), the presence of head‐to‐tail hydrogen phthalate chain substructures is found. In (IV), head‐to‐tail primary cation–anion associations are extended longitudinally into chains through the water‐bridged cation associations, and laterally by piperidinium–carboxylate N—H...O and water–carboxylate O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The structures reported here further demonstrate the utility of the isonipecotamide cation as a synthon for the generation of stable hydrogen‐bonded structures. An additional example of cation–anion association with this cation is also shown in the asymmetric three‐centre piperidinium–carboxylate N—H...O,O′ interaction in the first‐reported structure of a 2:1 isonipecotamide–carboxylate salt.     

A concise and efficient synthesis of amino‐substituted (1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl)pyrimidine hybrids: synthetic sequence and the molecular and supramolecular structures of six examples

A concise and efficient synthesis of a series of amino‐substituted benzimidazole–pyrimidine hybrids has been developed, starting from the readily available N⁴‐(2‐aminophenyl)‐6‐methoxy‐5‐nitrosopyrimidine‐2,4‐diamine. In each of N⁵‐benzyl‐6‐methoxy‐4‐(2‐phenyl‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl)pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, C₂₅H₂₂N₆O, (I), 6‐methoxy‐N⁵‐(4‐methoxybenzyl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, C₂₇H₂₆N₆O₃, (III), 6‐methoxy‐N⁵‐(4‐nitrobenzyl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, C₂₅H₂₀N₈O₅, (IV), the molecules are linked into three‐dimensional framework structures, using different combinations of N—H…N, N—H…O, C—H…O, C—H…N and C—H…π hydrogen bonds in each case. Oxidative cleavage of 6‐methoxy‐N⁵‐(4‐methylbenzyl)‐4‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, (II), with diiodine gave 6‐methoxy‐4‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidine‐2,5‐diamine, which crystallized as a monohydrate, C₁₉H₁₈N₆O·H₂O, (V), and reaction of (V) with trifluoroacetic acid gave two isomeric products, namely N‐{5‐amino‐6‐methoxy‐6‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidin‐2‐yl}‐2,2,2‐trifluoroacetamide, which crystallized as an ethyl acetate monosolvate, C₂₁H₁₇F₃N₆O₂·C₄H₈O₂, (VI), and N‐{2‐amino‐6‐methoxy‐4‐[2‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐benzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl]pyrimidin‐5‐yl}‐2,2,2‐trifluoroacetamide, which crystallized as a methanol monosolvate, C₂₁H₁₇F₃N₆O₂·CH₄O, (VIIa). For each of (V), (VI) and (VIIa), the supramolecular assembly is two‐dimensional, based on different combinations of O—H…N, N—H…O, N—H…N, C—H…O and C—H…π hydrogen bonds in each case. Comparisons are made with some related structures.     

Two phosphate–imidazole complexes with and without a hydrogen‐bonded guest mol­ecule

The mol­ecular structures of the complexes imidazolium 6,6′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐thio­diphenyl phosphate, C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₂₂H₂₈O₄PS⁻, (I), and imidazolium 6,6′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐thio­diphenyl phosphate diisopropyl hydrazo­dicarboxyl­ate hemisolvate, C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₂₂H₂₈O₄PS⁻·0.5C₈H₁₆N₂O₄, (II), have been determined. While (I) forms the expected hydrogen‐bonded chain utilizing the two imidazole N‐bound H atoms, in (II), the substituted hydrazine solvent mol­ecule inserts itself between the chains. Compound (I) exhibits a strong N—H⋯O hydrogen bond, with an N⋯O distance of 2.603 (2) Å. The hydrazine solvent molecule in (II) lies about a twofold axis and the N‐bound H atoms are involved in bifurcated hydrogen bonds with phosphate O atoms. A C‐bound H atom of the imidazolium cation is involved in a C—H⋯O inter­action with a carbonyl O atom of the hydrazine solvent mol­ecule.