Hermite series estimates of a probability density and its derivatives

The following estimate of the pth derivative of a probability density function is examined: $\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{k\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(x)}$, where h_k is the kth Hermite function and $\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{= (}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{n}\text{)}$Σ_{i = 1}ⁿh_k^(p)(X_i) is calculated from a sequence X₁,…, X_n of independent random variables having the common unknown density. If the density has r derivatives the integrated square error converges to zero in the mean and almost completely as rapidly as O(n^?α) and O(n^?α log n), respectively, where $\text{α =}\text{2(r ? p)}\text{(2r + 1)}$. Rates for the uniform convergence both in the mean square and almost complete are also given. For any finite interval they are O(n^?β) and $\text{O(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?\beta </mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{log}\text{n)}$, respectively, where $\text{β =}\text{(2(r ? p) ? 1)}\text{(2r + 1)}$.     

Strong law for the bootstrap

Let X₁, X₂, X₃, … be i.i.d. r.v. with E|X₁| < ∞, E X₁ = μ. Given a realization X = (X₁,X₂,…) and integers n and m, construct Y_n,i, i = 1, 2, …, m as i.i.d. r.v. with conditional distribution $\text{P}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}\text{= X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{) =}\text{1}\text{n}$ for 1 ? j ? n. ($\text{P}{}^1$ denotes conditional distribution given X). Conditions relating the growth rate of m with n and the moments of X₁ are given to ensure the almost sure convergence of $\text{(}\text{1}\text{m}\text{)Σ}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}$ toμ. This equation is of some relevance in the theory of Bootstrap as developed by Efron (1979) and Bickel and Freedman (1981).     

Eigenvalues of p-summing and lp-type operators in Banach spaces

This paper is a study of the distribution of eigenvalues of various classes of operators. In Section 1 we prove that the eigenvalues (λ_n(T)) of a p-absolutely summing operator, p ? 2, satisfy

$\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{?π}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(T).}$

This solves a problem of A. Pietsch. We give applications of this to integral operators in L_p-spaces, weakly singular operators, and matrix inequalities.In Section 2 we introduce the quasinormed ideal Π₂⁽ⁿ⁾, P = (p₁, …, p_n) and show that for T ∈ Π₂⁽ⁿ⁾, 2 = (2, …, 2) ∈ Nⁿ, the eigenvalues of T satisfy

$\text{∑}\text{i∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>2</mtext><mtext>n</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{?π}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_2\text{(T).}$

More generally, we show that for T ∈ Π_p⁽ⁿ⁾, P = (p₁, …, p_n), pi ? 2, the eigenvalues are absolutely p-summable,

$\text{1}\text{p}\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{1}\text{p}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{and}\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{?C}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{π}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{P}}\text{(T).}$

We also consider the distribution of eigenvalues of p-nuclear operators on L_r-spaces.In Section 3 we prove the Banach space analog of the classical Weyl inequality, namely

$\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{|λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)|}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{? C}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{∑}\text{n∈N}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(T)}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$

, 0 < p < ∞, where α_n denotes the Kolmogoroff, Gelfand of approximation numbers of the operator T. This solves a problem of Markus-Macaev.Finally we prove that Hilbert space is (isomorphically) the only Banach space X with the property that nuclear operators on X have absolutely summable eigenvalues. Using this result we show that if the nuclear operators on X are of type l₁ then X must be a Hilbert space.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

Trace formulas for blocks of Toeplitz-like operators

In this paper we study trace formulas for a class of operators of the form Π_T-GΠ_T in which G designates multiplication by a suitable restricted d × d matrix valued function G(γ) of γ?R¹and Π_T stands for the diagonal d × d matrix (δ_ijP_T) of orthogonal projections P_T of L²(R¹, dδ) onto the space I^T(dδ) of entire functions of exponential type ?T which are square summable on the line relative to the measure $\text{dδ(γ) = ¦h(γ)¦}{}^2\text{dγ}$. It is shown that, for a reasonably large class of h,

$\text{lim}\text{T↑∞}\text{trace}\text{[(?}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{G?}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{? ?}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{G}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{]}$

exists and is independent of the choice of h within the permitted class. These results are then used to study the asymptotic behavior, as T ↑ ∞, of the determinant of I ? Π_TGΠ_T.     

Minimax estimators for a multinormal precision matrix

Let S_p×p ～ Wishart (Σ, k), Σ unknown, k > p + 1. Minimax estimators of Σ^?1 are given for L₁, an Empirical Bayes loss function; and L₂, a standard loss function (R_i ≡ E(L_i ∣ Σ), i = 1, 2). The estimators are $\text{Σ}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+}\text{br}\text{(S)I}{}_{\mathrm{p\times p}}$, a, b ≥ 0, r(·) a functional on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>p(p+2)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$. Stein, Efron, and Morris studied the special cases $\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{(E}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k?p?1</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{)}$ and $\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+ (b/tr S)I}$, for certain, a, b. From their work $\text{R}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤ R}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$, a = k ? p ? 1, b = p² + p ? 2; whereas, we prove $\text{R}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$. The reversal is surprising because $\text{L}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) →}\text{L}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S)}$ a.e. (for a particular L₂). Assume $\text{R}$ (compact) ? $\text{S}$, $\text{S}$ the set of p × p p.s.d. matrices. A “divergence theorem” on functions F_p×p : $\text{R}$ → $\text{S}$ implies identities for R_i, i = 1, 2. Then, conditions are given for $\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$, i = 1, 2. Most of our results concern estimators with r(S) = t(U)/tr(S), U = p ∣S∣^1/p/tr(S).     

A third-order optimum property of the maximum likelihood estimator

Let θ⁽ⁿ⁾ denote the maximum likelihood estimator of a vector parameter, based on an i.i.d. sample of size n. The class of estimators θ⁽ⁿ⁾ + n^?1q(θ⁽ⁿ⁾), with q running through a class of sufficiently smooth functions, is essentially complete in the following sense: For any estimator T⁽ⁿ⁾ there exists q such that the risk of θ⁽ⁿ⁾ + n^?1q(θ⁽ⁿ⁾) exceeds the risk of T⁽ⁿ⁾ by an amount of order o(n^?1) at most, simultaneously for all loss functions which are bounded, symmetric, and neg-unimodal. If $\text{q}{}^1$ is chosen such that $\text{θ}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{+ n}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{q}{}^1\text{(θ}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{)}$ is unbiased up to $\text{o(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$, then this estimator minimizes the risk up to an amount of order o(n^?1) in the class of all estimators which are unbiased up to $\text{o(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$.The results are obtained under the assumption that T⁽ⁿ⁾ admits a stochastic expansion, and that either the distributions have—roughly speaking—densities with respect to the lebesgue measure, or the loss functions are sufficiently smooth.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

The probability that k positive integers are relatively r-prime

If r, k are positive integers, then $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples of positive integers (x₁, x₂, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r = 1. An explicit formula for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ is derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{ζ(rk)}$.If S = {p₁, p₂, …, p_a} is a finite set of primes, then 〈S〉 = {p₁^a₁p₂^a₂…p_s^a_s; p_i ∈ S and a_i ≥ 0 for all i} and $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples (x₁, x₃, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r ∈ 〈S〉. Asymptotic formulas for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ are derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(p}{}_1\text{… p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{ζ(rk)(p}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1) … (p}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1)}$.     

On the probability that given polynomials have a specified highest common factor

The polynomial functions f₁, f₂,…, f_m are found to have highest common factor h for a set of values of the variables x₁, x₂,…,x_m whose asymptotic density is

$\text{1}\text{h}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∑}\text{d∣h}\text{μ(d)Π}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{l\; =\; 1}}\text{?(f}{}_1\text{, dh)}\text{d}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{Π}\text{p∣h}\text{1?}\text{Π}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{l\; =\; 1}}\text{?(f}{}_1\text{, p)}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$

For the special case f₁(x) = f₂(x) = … = f_m(x) = x and h = 1 the above formula reduces to $\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{) =}\text{1}\text{ζ}\text{(m)}$, the density if m-tuples with highest common factor 1. Necessary and sufficient conditions on the polynomials f₁, f₂,…, f_m for the asymptotic density to be zero are found. In particular it is shown that either the polynomials may never have highest common factor h or else h is the highest common factor infinitely often and in fact with positive density.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

The KMS condition and spectral passivity in group duality

Let (A, G, α) be a C¹-dynamical system, where G is abelian, and let φ be an invariant state. Suppose that there is a neighbourhood Ω of the identity in $\text{G}\text{?}$ and a finite constant κ such that $\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{φ(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^1\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) ? κ}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{φ(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^1\text{)}$ whenever x_i lies in a spectral subspace $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$, where $\text{Ω}{}_1\text{+ … + Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{? Ω}$. This condition of complete spectral passivity, together with self-adjointness of the left kernel of φ, ensures that φ satisfies the KMS condition for some one-parameter subgroup of G.     

Decomposability of symmetric multilinear functions

Let V denote a finite dimensional vector space over a field K of characteristic 0, let T_n(V) denote the vector space whose elements are the K-valued n-linear functions on V, and let S_n(V) denote the subspace of T_n(V) whose members are the fully symmetric members of T_n(V). If $\text{L}$_n denotes the symmetric group on {1,2,…,n} then we define the projection $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{: T}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V) → S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V)}$ by the formula , where P_σ : T_n(V) → T_n(V) is defined so that P_σ(A)(y₁,y₂,…,y_n = A(y_σ(1),y_σ(2),…,y_σ(n)) for each A?T_n(V) and y_i?V, 1 ? i ? n. If $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, then x₁?x₂? … ?x_n denotes the member of T_n(V) such that $\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{· ? ? ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)(y}{}_1\text{,y}{}_2\text{,…,y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) = П}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ for each y₁ ,₂,…,y_n in V, and x₁·x₂… x_n denotes $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{? … ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$. If B? S_n(V) and there exists $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, such that B = x₁·x₂…x_n, then B is said to be decomposable. We present two sets of necessary and sufficient conditions for a member B of S_n(V) to be decomposable. One of these sets is valid for an arbitrary field of characteristic zero, while the other requires that K = R or C.     

On the maximum cardinality of a consistent set of arcs in a random tournament

For any tournament T on n vertices, let h(T) denote the maximum number of edges in the intersection of T with a transitive tournament on the same vertex set. Sharpening a previous result of Spencer, it is proved that, if T_n denotes the random tournament on n vertices, then, $\text{P}$$\text{(h(T}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) ≤}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{) + 1.73n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{) → 1}$ as n → ∞.     

The asymptotic equivalence of Bayes and maximum likelihood estimation

Let (X, $\text{A}$) be a measurable space, Θ ? $\text{R}$ an open interval and P_Ω ∥ $\text{A}$, Ω ? Θ, a family of probability measures fulfilling certain regularity conditions. Let $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ be the maximum likelihood estimate for the sample size n. Let λ be a prior distribution on Θ and let $\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>n,</mtext><mtext>x</mtext>}}$ be the posterior distribution for the sample size n given $\text{x}\text{? X}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$. $\text{L:}\text{Θ}\text{× Θ →}\text{R}$ denotes a loss function fulfilling certain regularity conditions and T_n denotes the Bayes estimate relative to λ and L for the sample size n. It is proved that for every compact K ? Θ there exists c_K ≥ 0 such that

This theorem improves results of Bickel and Yahav [3], and Ibragimov and Has'minskii [4], as far as the speed of convergence is concerned.     

On Berry-Esséen rates,a law of the iterated logarithm and an invariance principle for the proportion of the sample below the sample mean

Let F_n(x) be the empirical distribution function based on n independent random variables X₁,…,X_n from a common distribution function F(x), and let $\text{X}\text{= Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{n}$ be the sample mean. We derive the rate of convergence of $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{X}\text{)}$ to normality (for the regular as well as nonregular cases), a law of iterated logarithm, and an invariance principle for $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{X}\text{)}$.     

A remark on the tail probability of a distribution

Let {X_n}_n≥1 be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables. For each integer n ≥ 1 and positive constants r, t, and ?, let S_n = Σ_j=1ⁿX_j and $\text{E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(r, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{r?2}}\text{P{|S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>r</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{}}$. In this paper, we prove that (1) lim_?→0+?^α(r?1)E{N_∞(r, t, ?)} = K(r, t) if E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) = 1, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞, where 2 ≤ t < 2r ≤ 2t, $\text{K(r, t) =}\text{{2}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha (r?1)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{Γ(}\text{(1 + α(r ? 1))}\text{2}\text{)}}\text{{(r ? 1) Γ(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}}$, and $\text{α =}\text{2t}\text{(2r ? t)}$; (2) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{?\to 0+}}\text{G(t, ?)}\text{H(t, ?)}\text{= 0}$ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(|X₁|^t) < ∞, where G(t, ?) = E{N_∞(t, t, ?)} = Σ_n=1^∞n^t?2P{| S_n | > ?n} → ∞ as ? → 0+ and $\text{H(t, ?) = E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(t, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{t?2}}\text{P{| S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>2</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{} → ∞}\text{as}\text{? → 0+}$, i.e., H(t, ?) goes to infinity much faster than G(t, ?) as ? → 0+ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞. Our results provide us with a much better and deeper understanding of the tail probability of a distribution.     

A maximization problem and its application to canonical correlation

Let Σ be an n × n positive definite matrix with eigenvalues λ₁ ≥ λ₂ ≥ … ≥ λ_n > 0 and let M = {x, y | x?Rⁿ, y?Rⁿ, x ≠ 0, y ≠ 0, x′y = 0}. Then for x, y in M, we have that $\text{x′Σy}\text{(x′Σxy′Σy)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{≤}\text{(λ}{}_1\text{? λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(λ}{}_1\text{+ λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ and the inequality is sharp. If

$\text{∑=}\text{∑}{}_{11}\text{∑}{}_{12}\text{∑}{}_{21}\text{∑}{}_{22}$

is a partitioning of Σ, let θ₁ be the largest canonical correlation coefficient. The above result yields $\text{θ}{}_1\text{≤}\text{(λ}{}_1\text{? λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(λ}{}_1\text{+ λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$.     

Trace formulas for a class of Toeplitz-like operators II

Let P_T denote the orthogonal projection of L²(R¹, dΔ) onto the space of entire functions of exponential type ? T which are square summable on the line with respect to the measure $\text{dΔ(γ) = ¦ h(γ)¦}{}^2\text{dγ}$, and let G denote the operator of multiplication by a suitably restricted complex valued function g. It is shown that if $\text{(γ}{}^2\text{+ 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{log}\text{¦ h(γ)¦}$ is summable, if $\text{¦ h ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?2}}$ is locally summable, and if $\text{h}\text{h}{}^{\mathrm{\#}}$ belongs to the span in L^∞ of e^?iyTH^∞:T ? 0, in which h is chosen to be an outer function and h^#(γ) agrees with the complex conjugate of h(γ) on the line, then

$\text{lim trace}\text{T↑∞}\text{{(P}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{GP}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{? P}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{G}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{}}$

exists and is independent of h for every positive integer n. This extends the range of validity of a formula due to Mark Kac who evaluated this limit in the special case h = 1 using a different formalism. It also extends earlier results of the author which were established under more stringent conditions on h. The conclusions are based in part upon a preliminary study of a more general class of projections.